CHAPTER 3 THE THREE MAJOR EDUCATION EVALUATION STUDIES INTRODUCTION This segment focuses on the three major education evaluation studies. In the study of the policies and issues concerning the Philippine Educational System, a closer look into education evaluation studies will provide a better perspective about Philippine education from the onset of the American Period into the Marcos Regime. This is what this part of the chapter will attempt to unravel. Objectives At the end of this chapter the student is expected to have: 1. Familiarized himself with the major evaluation studies on Philippine education and the results thereof. 2. A clearer and better perspective of Philippine education from the onset of the American Period to the Martial Law Regime. THE MONROE SURVEY Historical Antecedents Before Spain ceded the Philippine to the Americans in 1898 there were conditions which were required by the Spaniards to be fulfilled. The Spaniards required that a mock battle with the Americans should be carried out to save their faces and honor. For it is the tradition of Spanish soldiers to resist the enemy before a surrender is executed. The Americans are to provide $20 million as a compensation package for war loans incurred by Spain. The United State congress will determine civil and political rights of the inhabitants of ceded territories including two other requirements which are not within the interest of Filipinos. 39 History is witness to the military government established in the Philippines by the Americans. Under American rule the Philippines had experienced the democratic leadership of Governor General Wesley Merritt, Governor General Elwell S. Otis and Governor General Arthur McArthur. The President of the United States at this period was President McKinley. President McKinley had created the Schurman Commission (1899-1900) and the Taft Commission. The Taft Commission had instruction from President McKinley which stated that the American Policy to be observed in the Philippines will be based on democratic principles. The democratic principles are not designed for American satisfaction or for the expression of their theoretical views but for the happiness, peace and prosperity of the people of the Philippines with economic prospects remaining in silence. The Americans kept their promise to grant Filipinos participation in the governance of themselves. Under William H. Taft the Filipinos were granted government control at the local level for “all pacified provinces” while for the unpacified provinces “military rule” will be exercised and shall be “under the jurisdiction of the military”. Inauguration of the civil government in Manila was on July 4, 1901. The Filipino people have been granted representation in American Congress by two resident commissioners: Benito Legarda (1902-1907) and Pablo Ocampo (1907-1909). These resident commissioners were to represent and defend Filipino interests in America. This scenario was made possible by the Philippine Bill of 1902 (Ibid.). The Jones Law of 1916 which was authored by William Atkinson, enacted by the United States Congress then signed by President Wilson, promised to grant independence to the Philippines as soon as a stable government has been set up therein. The Americans introduced a better communication system and improved the mail service including the need for Sound Philippine currency. The Sound Philippine Currency Act was enacted in 1903. This act placed the Philippine peso on gold standard. Advent of Popular Education One of the most vital contributions of the American leadership experienced by the Filipinos was popular education. Education is no longer a privilege to be enjoyed by few rich families. This first American school to open 40 was in Corrigidor Island. American soldiers became the first teachers along with American teachers transported by the sea vessel THOMAS. These American teachers came to be known as Thomasites. They served as “the vanguard of American culture and democracy in the Philippines”. Under their tutelage Filipino learners learned to use English in their daily conversation, letters, prose and poetry (Ibid.). The Filipinos’ clamor for popular education inspired the Americans in the helm of the Philippine government to conduct an educational survey to assess the condition of Filipino education. The Monroe Survey of 1925 was a sincere way of expressing the Americans’ sentiments occupying the Philippine Islands to improve their education. The Monroe Survey of 1925 was conducted 25 years after the establishment of the Philippine Education System during the American Occupation. The survey was headed by Paul Monroe. It consisted of 9 American members with the addition of 13 research associates. The 13 research associates were composed of 9 Filipinos and 4 Americans. The research was done on a massive scale which included Manila and 29 provinces in the Philippines. The total population sample of the research study were 32,000 pupils and 1,077 teachers. Results of the Survey The survey showed that the most critical issue is the extent to which Filipinos learned English. It was confirmed that the Filipinos performed below the standard when compared with their American counterparts in the extent of learning English. Nevertheless in the Province of Laguna learners are an exemption of the findings of the Monroe Survey. Also the study found that teachers from Iloilo posted much higher scores over those of the Laguna and Bulacan teachers. The difference in learners’ scores in English is attributed to the silent reading techniques of instruction and inadequate time exposure in English at school. Another reason which may account for the learners’ low English scores is due to poor teaching at school. Supporting this view is the lower performance level of learners at the higher grades than those at the primary level. Perhaps, the progressive accumulation of poor reading skills of learners as they advance through the grades maybe caused by the lack of reading materials in the home environment, inadequate speech models as English was neither used as a language at home. And thus may be made possible probably because of parents’ neglect to intervene in their children’s education. 41 On the basis of the findings of the Monroe Survey the following recommendations were made: 1. the materials which will be used in learning English should be within the scope of the reality background of experiences of the learners; and 2. teacher training should be improved in order for the teachers to be proficient in speaking and in teaching English to provide the speech models for the learners and the course of study in science should be revised. THE SWANSON SURVEY Prelude The second education survey conducted regarding the Philippine Educational System was the Swanson Survey of 1960. The Swanson Survey was said to be a joint project conducted by the International Cooperation Administration of the United States of America and the National Economic Council of the Philippines. The Swanson Survey team was composed of an American Technical Staff and 11 Filipino counterparts. All of the Philippine public schools were studied. The research study covered: Elementary Education, Secondary Education, Vocational Education, Teacher Education, Organization and Administration in the public schools including the financing of the same. While it can be seen that the Swanson Survey team and the Monroe Survey team have Americans and Filipinos as members it was claimed that the premise of the Swanson Survey was similar to that of the Monroe Survey. The premise of the Swanson Survey was predicated on the philosophy that education can be a major determinant to social change. The American economist Schultz succinctly stated that education is a social investment in the development of human capital formation. Education is an investment for man and the facilitation of investment in personal development. The collectively developing capabilities and skills of the human person may usher in a stable economy, political integrity and industrial development which are the portents of a strong republic. But in the 1960’s the Philippines has a low per capita expenditure for education. As a result of the low per capita expenditure for the education of the Filipino there was the corresponding effect on low per capita income inspite of abundant natural resources. 42 Five Areas of Concern The Swanson Survey of 1960 identified five areas of concern of the Philippine Educational System. These are the quantity of educational services, the quality of educational services, the financing of the public schools, the problem on cultural minorities, and the problem caused by the adoption of foreign educational practices which do not at all match to the local conditions. Assessment Results The results of study showed that there was no difference in the performance of learners from the community and learners from the general elementary school. There was a significant difference between the scores of the learners of the community and general elementary and that of the laboratory school. The differing performance of learners may perhaps be due to the philosophy espoused by the school. For example the philosophy adopted by the schools as a matter of policy was “to integrate the education of the child with that of the adult toward home and community” improvement, “to utilize community resources in instruction to make school learning fundamentally related to the realities of life”, and to develop people (children, youth and adults) to ”become useful members of society through their continuous” and maximum participation in democratic way of life. Probably another reason for the difference in the performance of learners in the general elementary school, the community school, and the laboratory school may be in the test administered to the learners. The test administered may not have jibed with the philosophy of the school as the test was based on a test performance on language, arithmetic and reading. On the basis of the findings, it can be gleaned that the tests administered to the learners have no validity and were not therefore reliable because the tests did not measure what they intend to measure Recommendations The Swanson Survey of 1960 established a positive relationship existing between low per capita investment in the education of the Filipino and their per capita income as an outcome of the low degree of the Filipino’s educational achievement. It might be inferred that the Swanson Survey team may have moved for the increase in the budget appropriation to be given to education to 43 ameliorate if not to rectify the unfavorable situation affecting Philippine education. In 1960, Dr. Carlos P. Romulo, former ambassador and president of the United Nations’ General Assembly and statesman, made certain admissions regarding the state of the Philippine Educational System. According to Romulo “the prospect for excellence in the educational system is discouraging”. The Philippine Educational System is “in dismal state”. He enumerated the array of factors that affect the delivery of quality education: 1. Many of our schools are substandard; 2. The learners are ill-prepared to cope with further learning and to face life; and 3. Our teachers are not professionally prepared for the duties of a teacher. Based on Romulo’s observations regarding the state of the Philippine Educational System, he recommended overhauling it. He suggested the formation of an all-Filipino commission to make a survey of the entire Philippine Educational System starting from the elementary level, to the secondary level, and to the tertiary level in both the public and private schools. The Philippine Commission to be created will survey all phases of the educational process to include financing of education, administration of education and teacher training as these were important considerations to improve education. When tasked to carry out the duties and responsibilities as Secretary of Education in 1965 Romulo immediately convened Division Superintendents and Supervisors in Baguio City. Romulo required the Division Superintendents and Supervisors to answer a questionnaire that was devised to get their expert opinions about the Philippine Educational System. The response of the experts substantiated Romulo’s pronouncement of “the dismal state” of the Philippine Educational System. On July 18, 1967 the Philippine President by virtue of R.A. 4372 caused the reactivation of the Board of National Education. Republic Act 4372 entrusted to the Board of National Education various functions. In view of the many functions to be discharged by the Board of National Education a number of standing committees were created. These standing committees which were to assist the Board of National Education improve the Philippine Educational System were: the curriculum committee; the administrative committee; 44 the finance committee; and the legislative committee. Moreover, two other special committees were organized to take charge of Teacher Education and Vocational Technical Education. The Department of Education under the able leadership of Romulo constituted an extra unit, the Department of Education Project Execution and Coordination System (DEPECS). The DEPECS has a competent research component consisting of economic statistician and experts in the different fields in education. There were important reforms in education which were achieved by the Board of National Education. These important reforms in education were: the revision of the curriculum and its organizational aspects; the increase in the credit units for the Rizal course of from 1 unit to 3 credit units at the collegiate level; the approval of a policy of the use of Filipino National Language as a medium of instruction at the elementary level; and the reduction to 12 units of the course in Spanish at the tertiary level. Under the different committees which were put up by the Board of National Education (BNE), the following were accomplished: the revision of the teacher education program, elementary school curriculum, revisions of the objectives of education in all levels of the educational system, and educational financing. Aside from the achievements of the Board of National Education, rapport was also established between the Department of Education and Congress. Bills in education were referred to the B.N.E. for comments and recommendations. With such amiable interactions of Congress and the Department of Education, education for the Filipino became a collaborative enterprise geared to national development. Inspite of the enumerated achievements in education there remained the still nagging problems which remained unresolved. These were: the lack of classrooms and the lack of textbooks; 45 An objective and farsighted man that Romulo is, he recommended that in order for Philippine education to be more effective, administration and supervision should be well organized; staffing of administrators and teachers should be decentralized; revision in financing the schools such as redistribution of revenues and funding obligations between the national and local government; review of the school’s curricula should be an a continuous basis; and allow variations due regional and economic circumstances of learners to be able to cope with such a plan. Romulo reminded the Filipino people responsible for educating the citizenry “to harness our energies and resources to preserve” what was already gained. But the most challenging area of concern are those “in ourselves” – dispositions, core values and loyalties (Education Quarterly, 1968). PROJECT SOUTELE Background The Survey of the Outcomes of Elementary Education (Soutele) was done by EDPITAF in 1975. The EDPITAF survey was designed to install a decision making machine of growth such as researches, planners and implementors for the 4th, 5th, and 6th grades with possible relationship between scholastic achievement and school and non-school factors. There were major objectives which the project aimed to accomplish. These were: to describe, measure and analyze learning outcomes among the 6th grades on a nationwide basis in relation to a minimum learning package; to identify the factors in both the school and non-school learning environment to explain for the variations in scholastic achievements; to identify which among these factors could be altered or modified by way of planning and decision making; and to recommend interventions which can be effected and to recommend areas requiring research. 46 Results of the Three Surveys The result of the survey study showed that the pupils’ achievement varied appreciably across 3 types of schools: barrio, central and private. The highest achievement score in performance on reading, language and science were posted by the private schools, central schools and barrio schools, respectively. The probable explanation made for the school environment which affected marked performance in reading, language and science maybe due to learners’ attendance to early childhood education, parents education and income of the family. These “socio-economic inequalities” in the learners’ background may have been expressed into the inequalities in their learning capabilities. Summary Chapter 3 presented extensively the major evaluation studies on Philippine education, namely: the Monroe Survey of 1925, the Swanson Survey of 1960, and the Survey of the Outco4mes of Elementary Education (Soutele) which was conducted by the Educational Project Implementation Task Force or EDPITAF. The Monroe Survey showed that the most critical issue is the extent to which Filipinos learned English. It confirmed that the Filipinos performed below standard when compared with their American counterparts in the extent on learning English. On the other hand, the Swanson Survey explained that the differing performance of learners may perhaps be due to the philosophy espoused by the school. Another reason for the difference in the performance of learners may be in the poor teaching methods administered to the learners. Project Soutele showed that the pupils’ achievement varied appreciably across 3 types of schools: barrio central and private. The highest achievement score in performance on reading, language and science were posted by the private schools, central schools and barrio schools, respectively. Activity Identify an educational project that has been in existence for at least three years now. Prepare your report/account on the project and make an oral report on it in the class.