Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 1 Reactions Student 1: None of us has been able to draw a figure that has ½turn symmetry and only one reflection symmetry. Can you draw one for us? Mathematician: Student 2: Maybe it is not possible to draw such a figure. But surely we can if we only tried long enough! Mathematician: Let’s try to answer this question by exploring more about symmetries. Student 3: OK. Just what is a symmetry? Mathematician: weeks back? Student 4: Good question. Do you remember what we said a few We first made some definitions: DEFINITIONS. An isometry (i-SOM-e-tree) is a transformation that preserves distances (and angle measures). A symmetry of a figure is an isometry of a region of space that takes the figure (or the portion of it in the region) onto itself. (dictionary terms) Student 1: We used transparencies in order to make sure that distances and angle measures were not changed. Student 2: Let’s summarize what we learned about symmetries of straight lines and circles: A straight line has: – translation symmetry; also called constant curvature – ½-turn symmetry about every point on the line – mirror symmetry in the line; also called reflectionin-the-line symmetry, or bilateral symmetry – mirror symmetry perpendicular to the line at any point on the line; also called reflection-perpendicularto-the-line symmetry at any point on the line A circle has: – rotation symmetry about its center; also called constant curvature. – mirror symmetry along any diameter Mathematician: Good! So, the isometries that we used were translations, rotations, and reflections. For finite figures (like circles or the figures at the beginning of class) we need only rotations or reflections. Translation symmetry only works for figures like straight lines that go on and on indefinitely. Later, we will also explore another symmetry, called a glide, for figures that go on and on. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Student 3: Page 2 Reactions Can you show us an example of glide symmetry? Mathematician: Sure! and on indefinitely: Look at a decoration that we imagine goes on This has glide symmetry – it can move forward or backward but not by any distance. It must go from bump to bump. Student 4: Cool! Mathematician: Now let’s look at symmetries of a rectangle. Student 1: A rectangle seems to have ½-turn symmetry about some point in the center. Student 2: How do we find that point? Mathematician: I suggest we first draw in a diagonal of the rectangle ABCD and mark its midpoint P: D A P B C Student 3: This diagonal is a transversal of the parallel sides, AD and BC, and thus the marked angles, CBD and ADB, are congruent. We also showed this in class. Student 4: We also showed that, AD and BC, have a common Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 3 Reactions perpendicular thru P. Mathematician: And now, if we do a ½-turn about the center point P then B→D, (read “B goes to D”), CBD→ADB, C→A. To help see this, I suggest that everyone copy the above diagram on a blank sheet of paper and perform the ½-turn of the paper. Student 1: Because of the ½-turn we know that P is the midpoint of the common perpendicular. Student 2: But also the sides, CD and BA, are parallel and so the same applies to them Student 3: So, CD and BA, also have a common perpendicular. Mathematician: Good, so finally we have the picture: D A P C B Student 1: I notice that the rectangle has ½-turn symmetry and 2 reflection symmetries. How is this going to help us decide if there are any figures with ½-turn symmetry and only 1 reflection symmetry? Mathematician: to show. First let’s formulate carefully what it is we want Student 2: We want to show that there cannot be any figure with ½-turn symmetry and only 1 reflection symmetry. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 4 Reactions Mathematician: Yes, that is what we want to show but that is negative – trying to prove that something does not exist. We first need to turn it into a positive statement. Student 3: Like what? Mathematician: How about: “If a figure has ½-turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry, then it must also have at least one more reflection symmetry.”? Will this do what we want? Student 4: Yes, this would show that no figure with ½-turn symmetry has only 1 reflection symmetry. Student 1: But how can we possibly show this for ALL figures. Maybe there are figures that no one has thought of yet. Mathematician: this Theorem: Good point. Let’s try. We are trying to prove Theorem. If a figure has ½-turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry, then it must also have at least one more reflection symmetry. Student 2: What does “theorem” mean? Mathematician: The original meaning of “theorem” was “that which has been seen”. We want to see why it is true. Student 3: How do we see it? Mathematician: We devise a communication that convinces and answers – “why?” Such a communication is called a proof. So now we can define “theorem” to be a statement which has a proof. Student 4: But this does not sound like the “2-column proofs” that we have heard about. Mathematician: That is true. A 2-column proof is only one way of attempting to give a communication that convinces and answers – “Why?” There are many other ways. Proofs can involve pictures and motions and imaginations, in addition to words. Student 1: How do we find a proof of our theorem so that it convinces and answers – “why?” Mathematician: Let’s imagine we have a figure with ½-turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 5 Reactions Student 2: We do not have to imagine this, we already constructed many examples. Mathematician: That is true, but we want to do this with any figure with ½-turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry. We need to imagine doing this with any such figure even those that no one thought of yet. Student 3: That is weird! what it is? Mathematician: How can we imagine it if no-one knows Well, what DO we know about this figure? Student 4: We only know that it has ½-turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry. Mathematician: OK, so let’s imagine only the point that is the center of the ½-turn symmetry and the line that is the line of reflection symmetry. In our imagination everything else about the figure is fuzzy. Student 1: OK, so now I am imagining a dashed line of reflection and a dot that is the center of the ½-turn with everything else fuzzy. I can draw it like this: Mathematician: OK, now copy this onto a transparency and explore what you can tell about the fuzzy figure. What happens if we do a half turn of the transparency about the dot? Student 2: Well, because the dot is the center of ½-turn symmetry of the fuzzy figure, then after I do the ½-turn the fuzzy figure on the transparency must be back on top of the figure on the paper. Student 3: So, if that is true then the situation looks like this: Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Line of reflection symmetry on paper Page 6 Reactions Line of reflection symmetry on transparency Student 4: So, if all of this is true, then there must be a second line of reflection symmetry. Mathematician: Good. Look at the example of the decoration with glide symmetry. This decoration is an example of this sort. Student 1: I am not convinced! the dot not being on the line. What we have done here depends on Mathematician: Very good! So, we have not finished the proof. We have so far only shown that if the dot is not on the line then there is another line of reflection symmetry. Now we have to look at the other case: The center of ½-turn symmetry is on the line of reflection symmetry. Here’s the picture for this case: Student 2: In that case the above argument does not work because the half turn will just take the line of reflection onto itself. Mathematician: OK, now lets draw a rectangle on the paper so that its center of ½-turn symmetry and line of refection symmetry are the same as for our imagined fuzzy figure. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 7 Reactions D A C B Student 3: So, the rectangle has the same ½-turn symmetry as the imagined fuzzy figure and also has the same reflection symmetry about the dashed line. Mathematician: Now trace this onto the transparency and first reflect (flip) about the dashed line and then rotate a ½-turn about the dot. I suggest each of you fill in the missing letters. Reflection over the dashed line ½-turn about the dot A → D A → C B → ______ B → ______ C → ______ C → ______ D → ______ D → ______ Student 4: So this reflection in the dashed line followed by the ½-turn about the dot, takes: A → B, B → A, C → D, D → C Mathematician: What do you notice about this? Student 1: I notice that this is the same arrow diagram as the other reflection symmetry of the rectangle -- the reflection about the centered horizontal line. Mathematician: Good! Student 2: We already know that this is a symmetry of the rectangle, but how do we know that it is a symmetry of the fuzzy figure? Mathematician: Think back – what is a symmetry? when in doubt we refer back to the definitions. In mathematics, Student 3: A symmetry of a figure is an isometry that takes the figure onto itself. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Mathematician: isometry? Page 8 Reactions So is the reflection followed by the ½-turn an Student 4: Yes, because we did it with the transparency and the transparency keeps all lengths and angles the same. Student 1: I see it because both the reflection and the ½-turn preserve lengths and angles and so one followed by the other must preserve lengths and angles. Mathematician: So does the reflection followed by the ½-turn take the fuzzy figure onto itself? Student 2: Sure! The reflection takes the fuzzy figure onto itself because that was what we knew about the dashed line. And then the ½-turn does the same thing. Student 3: So, the reflection followed by the ½-turn is a symmetry of the fuzzy figure. And we see that it is also a reflection about a horizontal line thru the dot. Student 4: We are done! We have shown that if any figure has ½turn symmetry and a reflection symmetry then it must have (at least) one more reflection symmetry. Mathematician: Very, very good. We now have a proof of the theorem. I suggest you all go back over the proof and summarize it for yourself and make sure it convinces you. The proof of this theorem involved two different cases. One case involved the line of symmetry not passing through the point of half turn symmetry and the other case involved the line of symmetry passing through the point of half-turn symmetry. In your own words describe what the argument is for each case being true. Case 1. Name: __________________ Straight and Symmetries 4 Page 9 Reactions Case 2. Was this proof convincing to you? Why or Why not?