Public Opinion Assignment A. Public Opinion Key Terms B. What If…. Students were required to pass a National Civics Exam? Read/Assess/React C. What is Public Opinion? Define/Explanation/Elaborate D. How is Public Opinion formed???? E. Political Preferences and Voting Behavior F. Measuring Public Opinion (Examining Polling) G. Technology and Opinion Polls (Methods, Advantages/Disadvantages, etc.) H. Public Opinion and the Political Process I. Read Making a Difference: Being a Critical Consumer of Opinion Polls (Assess/React) Public Opinion Assignment A. Public Opinion Key Terms B. What If…. Students were required to pass a National Civics Exam? Read/Assess/React C. What is Public Opinion? Define/Explanation/Elaborate D. How is Public Opinion formed???? E. Political Preferences and Voting Behavior F. Measuring Public Opinion (Examining Polling) G. Technology and Opinion Polls (Methods, Advantages/Disadvantages, etc.) H. Public Opinion and the Political Process I. Read Making a Difference: Being a Critical Consumer of Opinion Polls (Assess/React) Opinion Polls (Website Links) Polling Report - Collection of U.S. political polls from around the country. Updated when new polls are released. Data are from national surveys of the American public. Issues polls and articles by leading pollsters are available to subscribers. Real Clear Politics - Collection of up-to-date political news from around the web. Large selection of polls for political races divided into Issues races or position races. Political Polls - The Washington Post's directory for historical national political polls. The Data Directory is a guide to public opinion data published on the Internet by nonpartisan organizations. Gallup Poll - Political polls & a directory for hundreds of other polls. The organization has studied human nature & behavior for over 70 years & employs many of the world's leading scientists in management, economics, psychology & sociology. Buzz Dash - Tool for gauging popular opinion on a wide range of topics - from sports, movies and politics to relationships and philosophy. A real-time forum where people can solicit, measure & share opinions on nearly any issue. View real-time popular opinion on a range of timely issues. Express opinions by voting or commenting on individual issues. Post individual buzzbites to personal web pages, blogs or emails. Zogby - Offers their polling service as well as free recent polls with analysis. Zogby International has been tracking public opinion since 1984 in North America, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. Rasmussen Reports - Updated Presidential Job Approval Ratings daily & polls every Senate & Governor's race constantly. Was the nation's most accurate polling firm during the Presidential election & the only one to project both Bush & Kerry's vote total within half a percentage point of the actual outcome. Political Polls - A information directory for political polls. Divided into: Polling Organizations, Recent Polls, Polling News, Polling Methodology, Truth About Bogus Polls, Push Polls & Polling Analysis. USA Election Polls - A collection of thousands of polls, analysis, and up-to-date candidate information. The Cook Political Report - Founded in 1984, The Cook Political Report is an independent, non-partisan newsletter that analyzes elections and campaigns for the US House of Representatives, US Senate, Governors and President as well as American political trends. Includes: A complete listing of every potential candidate for the U.S. House, Senate and Governor. National Opinion Surveys American National Election Studies Conducted biennially since 1952, the survey gauges public sentiment on the political process, the role of government, and social and economic issues. This site permits download of the ANES datasets, most of which are also available through ICPSR and CISER. American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy Conducted on behalf of the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, it measures the concerns of Americans regarding economic, political, and military engagement in foreign affairs. Conducted every four years from 1974 to 2002 and now biennially, fulltext reports results are accessible on the site. Recent years incorporate parallel surveys in EU countries, Mexico, and Korea. The 2006 survey included representative polls of China and India. Most years can be obtained as numeric files from ICPSR and CISER. Gallup Organization Recent political and economic polling results, as well as "special reports" that examine attitudes toward social issues and consumer behavior. Some multinational studies are included. (Olin Library owns the Gallup Poll Monthly in electronic and hardcopy.) Codebooks and datasets for many Gallup polls are available from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research site (see separate entry below). GallupBrain is a question bank that allows searching for survey questions in over 70 years of Gallup polls. Cornell doesn't subscribe so you can't view response frequencies, but GallupBrain is a useful tool if you're looking for question wording. General Social Survey The GSS has been conducted since 1972 by the National Opinion Research Center. It measures attitudes toward social and public policy issues, economic status, political events, work, and family life. Some questions are asked each year, and topical modules are administered on a rotating basis that focus on current topics such as gender equity, religious beliefs, and perception of work. The 1972-2006 file was released in May 2007. The Survey Documentation and Analysis (SDA) software at UC Berkeley allows you to construct tables from the 1972-2006 cumulative file based on variables you select, perform custom extracts, and create and recode variables. The NORC site has a similar data analysis tool using the NESSTAR software. You can use recent GSS years from the Association of Religion Data Archives, view responses to individual questions crosstabulated by respondent categories, and view frequencies using spiffy graphics. (CISER has the GSS data files on its server.) iPOLL, Roper Center for Public Opinion Research Cornell users only Although the database is compiled by the Roper Center, it contains questions from polls conducted by other U.S. organizations such as Harris, Gallup, National Opinion Research Center, and major news establishments, some back to 1936. The questions often contain response frequencies, sometimes broken down by respondents' demographics. iPOLL is accessible to Cornell users from the Roper Center iPOLL site; use this link for off- campus access. See CISER's Roper Center membership page for more information on iPOLL and other Roper services. Maxwell Poll, Syracuse University A national sample poll of households in the continental United States and conducted annual since 2004 by the Campbell Public Affairs Institute. Its focus is on individual civic engagement and perceptions of economic inequality . Download the microdata in Excel, SAS, and SPSS formats. National Opinion Research Center NORC conducts survey research on public policy issues for a variety of agencies and corporations. See the "Projects" section for copies of recent surveys and their reports. NORC also conducts the General Social Survey (see above). Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina The Public Opinion Poll Question Database contains approximately 200,000 questions from surveys conducted since 1958, searchable by keyword or phrase. Questions are derived from the Louis Harris polls and state-level polling organizations from 22 states, with strong coverage of Southern states. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press An "independent opinion research group that studies attitudes toward press, politics and public policy issues." Contains summaries of results, comparisons of how attitudes change over time, copies of questionnaires, and descriptions of survey methodologies. Some summaries have response frequency tables with demographic breakdowns. From the header bar, select Survey Reports for summaries and related questionnaires going back to 1997. Select Datasets to download datasets in zip format; each zip archive consists of a datafile, layout, and questionnaire. A terrific site. See also the links to other Pew Research sites with survey data, including the Global Attitudes Project, Internet and American Life Project, and the Pew Hispanic Center. Poll Track Cornell users only Poll Track brings together recent and historical polls conducted on national issues by many organizations, with emphasis on politics and campaigns. The search feature pinpoints polls and questions on specific topics. Produced by the National Journal. Polling Report Publishes results of questions from surveys conducted by major polling organizations. You can search for specific topics or browse under broad categories (Politics and Policy, Business/Economy, American Scene, National Barometer). Information on the original survey, sample size, and frequencies accompanies each question. Find out popular opinions on elected officials at the national and state levels, consumer attitudes on economic conditions, and views about popular culture. (Yes, most people polled believe that Elvis is dead.) Polling the Nations Cornell users only This source compiles questions from over 14,000 polls, including those conducted by national, regional, and local survey organizations, both for profit and not-for-profit. Coverage is from 1986 forward and includes non-US surveys such as those in the Eurobarometer series. Search many fields by keywords or phrases (poll title, question text, subject headings, survey participants), and all the questions from one survey can be retrieved by using advanced search techniques. Response frequencies are included but with no demographic breakdowns. Public Agenda A nonpartisan opinion research organization that reports surveys conducted by national firms on public policy issues. Especially strong coverage of quality of life and social issues; for example, race relations, health care, privacy, drug abuse, crime, the environment, and immigration. Great graphs and tables, and cautionary notes about question wordings, the timing of the featured polls, and margins of error. A swell site. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research Located at the University of Connecticut, the Roper Center collects, disseminates, and distributes information about public opinion surveys and maintains an archive of over 10,000 data sets of American and foreign surveys. It also has a significant number of historical polls from the World War II period. CISER maintains a Roper Center membership on behalf of the Cornell University community. Benefits include the ability to download datasets directly through the Roper Express service and use of the iPOLL database; see this page for more information. Science and Engineering Indicators, National Science Foundation Includes information on public attitudes toward scientific research and its impact. Questions are excerpted from such many surveys, including the General Social Survey and NSF Survey of Public Attitudes. The Science and Engineering Indicators reports in their entirety can be viewed in html and PDF formats. Reports online include 1993, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Chapter 7 generally contains information specific to public attitudes and understanding of science, although there is also a searchable index for most years. Washington Post Poll Vault The results of selected Post polls since 1997. Most represent nationwide samples on national issues, others are on topics of regional interest. A brief article summarizes each poll. For most, question responses are broken down by demographics and have links to previous polls with similar questions. Using the "Polls" link in the left sidebar requires a registration process, but the "Find a Question" option does not. Sites with a State or Regional Emphasis Northeast Center for Politics and Public Affairs, Franklin & Marshall College Conducts the Keystone Poll of registered voters in Pennsylvania and focuses on opinions toward officeseekers and public-policy issues. (The Keystone Poll was previously affiliated with Millersville University.) Center for Survey Research, State University of New York, Stony Brook The Center conducts surveys based on national, New York State, and Long Island area samples. Most surveys are described briefly, but summaries of a few recent ones (notably, the recent Health Pulse of America surveys) include detailed results at the question level. Some Health Pulse of America datasets are available from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research. The Eagleton Poll, Scholarly Communication Center, Rutgers University Although emphasis is on voting behavior, some surveys measure attitudes toward economic, social, and political priorities. Geographic focus on New Jersey. Surveys from 1971+ are included. Empire State Poll, Survey Research Institute, Cornell University Conducted annually since 2003, the focus of ESP is issues of interest to New York State residents. This site contains survey summaries, questionnaires, and methodology reports. Marist Institute for Public Opinion Especially good source of surveys on issues specific to New York State and New York City. Polling Institute, Quinnipiac University Results of polls focusing on issues in New York State, New York City, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania, with emphasis on political opinion surveys. PublicMind Poll, Fairleigh Dickinson University Conducted since 2001, PublicMind tends to focus on state-specific issues in New Jersey and Delaware. Between 15 and 30 targeted polls are produced each year. Some summaries in English and Spanish. Survey data can't be downloaded, but most poll results are represented by detailed response tables and related graphics on the site. Siena Research Institute, Siena College SRI conducts polls on topics of public policy interest, including education, health care, and consumer confidence. Its focus is on New York State, and specifically the Capital District region. Textual summaries are often followed by detailed tables summarizing results by respondent demographics. Be aware that titles listed on the Recent Surveys and Polls and Archives pages don't reflect all of the surveys undertaken by the Institute. See also pages for the (archived) Siena New York Poll and the SRI Political Poll. Taubman Center for Public Policy and American Institutions, Brown University Sponsors the Brown University Survey that focuses on Rhode Island politics, attitudes toward economic development, and other public policy issues. University of New Hampshire Survey Center Home of the Granite State Poll of New Hampshire residents. Poll results are represented by detailed press releases or reports in PDF format. Zogby International In addition to polls on national issues, Zogby contains information on polls of particular interest to New Yorkers. You can search for terms or names with the search engine, although many poll results are summarized within its news and latest results sections. A poll focusing on upstate New York is a joint effort of Zogby and Colgate University. Use the Zogby site for snippets focusing on Upstate issues, and try to ignore its ubiquitous self-promotional sound bites. Southeast Arkansas Poll, Blair Center for the Study of Southern Politics and Society, University of Arkansas An annual poll begun in 1999, it addresses public policy issues at the state and national levels as well as attitudes toward ballot initiatives. Extensive summary reports, documentation and methodology files, and data downloads in SPSS and SAS formats. Institute for Public Opinion Research, Florida International University Conducts the annual FIU/Florida Polls on the quality of life for Floridians, as well as other surveys on topics specific to the Southeast. With the FIU Cuban Research Institute, it also conducts the occasional Cuba Poll of Cuban Americans residing in the Miami area. Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University Home of several polls, including the Commonwealth Poll, (attitudes towards political candidates and election issues), the Commonwealth Education Poll, and the VCU Life Sciences Survey (a national poll on ethical and public policy implications of scientific discovery). (As of early 2006, the Commonwealth Poll appears to be defunct.) Virginia Tech Center for Survey Research Home of the annual Quality of Life in Virginia survey. Midwest Office of Survey Research , Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University Since 1994, IPPSR has conducted the quarterly State of the State poll of Michigan residents. The site's Data on Demand function is slick beyond words. It permits online analysis of results, access to printed reports and documentation, and the ability to download datasets in SPSS format. Public Opinion Laboratory, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis A survey research facility that also functions as a learning lab for students. It polls Hoosier attitudes on crime, the State's lottery, race relations, underage drinking--and basketball. Most of the findings available online are limited to election poll results and surveys on charitable giving conducted in cooperation with the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. Survey Research Center, University of Cincinnati Home of the Ohio Poll and the Greater Cincinnati Survey. University of Wisconsin Survey Center Home of the Badger Poll of Wisconsin residents. Begun in 2002, it asks opinions about nationaland state-level issues. Badger Poll datasets are archived by the UW Data & Information Services Center. West Field (California) Poll California registered voters are polled for their opinions on electoral issues, statewide referenda, economic affairs, and other public policy topics. A searchable index to codebook contents, 1979 to date, is hosted at UC San Diego. Field Poll datasets are available for public FTP from UC Berkeley. Los Angeles Times Polls Index Summarizes polls back to 1996 conducted on the national or on the state or local level in California. Poll StatSheets (in PDF) go back to 1996 and each "contains the full question wording and sequence, current and past results (trend) for each question and a description of the survey methodology." Strong focus on California political, social, and economic issues. Some poll summaries require free registration, but the StatSheets have no registration requirement. Montana State University Billings Poll An annual poll conducted before Election Day. A primary focus is on performance of federal and state elected officials, although state topics such as environment, education, and fiscal policy are also covered. Oregon Survey Research Lab, University of Oregon The Oregon Survey Research Lab conducted a variety of surveys on topics of general interest and those specific to Oregon. Although the Lab closed in June 2005, about 200 datasets are available from the University of Oregon Libraries and Lab download archive (by survey title) Social Research Laboratory, Northern Arizona University Summaries of the Arizona Survey (also called the Grand Canyon State Poll), which was first conducted in 1994. Question items and reports (in PDF) for surveys since approximately 2000. Select Reports from the header bar. Non-U.S., Multinational or Cross-National Surveys Centre for Applied Social Surveys, Social and Community Planning Research and University of Southampton The Centre's Question Bank is a repository of questions used in its surveys on a variety of social attitudes. A good source for the wording and format of survey questions. European Public Opinion/L'opinion publique européenne This site represents the Public Opinion Analysis section of the European Commission and reports results of surveys conducted of European Union citizens on their attitudes toward the EU, its political and economic policies, and social values held by individuals. Primary among these is the Eurobarometer, and the site provides the ability to review responses to questions over time in survey countries. Survey coverage has recently expanded to include many countries in Central and Eastern Europe, the Candidate Countries Eurobarometer. CISER owns selected Eurobarometer datasets, and they are also available from ICPSR.) International Social Survey Programme A collaborative effort of social science research organizations in over 40 countries, the ISSP asks a battery of questions in all countries and focuses on a theme that is repeated at irregular intervals. Past topics iclude religion, the role of goverment, social inequality, and the environment. Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung at the University of Cologne maintains an archive of the surveys, including the ZACAT tool that creates custom tables and extracts from ISSP studies back to 1985. ZACAT requires user registration. (CISER and ICPSR have many of the ISSP studies.) Japanese Data Archive Latin American Survey Data Bank The Roper Center hosts these specialized archives, each consisting of about 1,000 titles. The one for Latin America represents 16 countries, with Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela studies forming the bulk of the collection. There is a searchable catalog of survey descriptions but no question-level access. An increasing number of these datasets can be downloaded through RoperExpress, and CISER can acquire others for Cornell users as needed. The Japanese Data Archive permits question-level access to its holdings through the JPOLL database. Access to JPOLL is free but requires online registration. Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) Political views are the focus of LAPOP surveys conducted in 20 countries. Survey years vary, with some as far back as the 1970s. (There are also a few representing Albania, Israel, and Madagascar, for reasons not explained on the site.) Use of the online query and analysis system is free, and the microdata (in SPSS) can be purchased. LAPOP is also home to AmericasBarometer, a series begun in 2004 to measure attitudes toward democratic values and behaviors in the Western hemisphere. Affiliated with the Center for the Americas, Vanderbilt University. World Public Opinion Brings together reports on opinion polls conducted in countries that are often overlooked by large media outlets. The amount of information on individual polls varies widely: lengthy summaries, copies of questionnaires and methodology reports, comparative graphics, detailed summary tables. Locate surveys by geographic region or topic. "Related Links" specific to each category identify international sources of polling organizations. There's relatively limited retrospective coverage. A project of the Program on International Policy Attitudes, University of Maryland. Other Lists of Public Opinion Sites Guide to Public Opinion Poll Web Sites: Polling Data from Around the World An annotated list of sites, this article was also published in C&RL News, October 2006. Polling and Public Opinion Data: A Research Guide Composed and maintained by Cornell University Library. Although printed and electronic holdings are specific to CUL holdings, this is a valuable list of resources, especially of tools that provide historical coverage of polls. Public Opinion, University of California, Irvine Although much content is specific to the University of California-Irvine, this guide contains key links to public opinion sites, specialized polls, and distributors of survey data. Cites many unique locations, particiularly related to minority groups, and is frequently updated. Also includes links to related professional associations, article and book indexes, and reference works in electronic and printed formats. Public Opinion and Attitudes , Data & Information Services Center, University of Wisconsin As close to an exhaustive list as one might find with lengthy, evaluative annotations. Public Opinion Subject Guide, Yale University Includes information on printed indexes, online indexes, and web sites to surveys and polling organizations. Maintained by Yale's Social Sciences Libraries. Outstanding up-to-date lists. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After students have read and studied this chapter, they should be able to: Define what we mean by public opinion and explain its uses by policy-makers and interest groups. Describe consensus opinion and divisive opinion. Explain how public opinion is formed in the United States, including political socialization by families, education, peers, the media, opinion leaders, and the influence of events. Explain the influence of education and occupation on voting behavior. Explain the influence of socioeconomic status. Explain the influence of religion, race and ethnicity, and geographical region. Define and explain the gender gap. Describe the flaws of early opinion polls. Describe current sampling techniques, including random sampling and quota sampling. Explain problems associated with telephone and Internet polls. Describe the trends in public opinion regarding trust in government and confidence in institutions. Describe some of the limits to the value of polls in making policy decisions. TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION Ask students (who wish to volunteer) to analyze how they themselves have been socialized politically. Compare and contrast the socialization of students with different backgrounds. What differences and similarities are there between these different individuals? A major concern for many Americans appears to be a lack of confidence in political leaders and a decline in political trust of government. An example of how big this problem has become is the lack of participation in the 2000 presidential election. Less than half of the adult population participated. If public confidence in the political system continues to decline, turnout rates could fall to an all time low. If the public has minimal involvement in the political process will democracy continue to function? BEYOND THE BOOK Ask students to devise a way to measure public opinion on your campus for a topic like Should the legal age to purchase alcoholic beverages be raised to 25? Would a quota poll be accurate? How could a random sample be used? CHAPTER OUTLINE In the United States and other democracies, people possess a variety of ways by which they can communicate their opinions to government officials and others. In turn, officials recognize the importance of public opinion, and often change policy (or have their positions bolstered) based on public opinion. While in some cases public opinion is clear and decisive, oftentimes it is murkier. In addition, public opinion can be shaped by the very policymakers who must also respond to it. That is, government officials do play a role in political socialization and often shape public opinion on a variety of issues. I. Defining Public Opinion Public opinion is the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs shared by some portion of adults. Private opinion becomes public opinion when an individual takes some type of action to express an opinion to others publicly. We can look to the distribution of public opinion to determine how divided the public is on any given issue. When there is general agreement on an issue, there is said to be a consensus. When opinions are sharply divided, there is divisive opinion. II. How Public Opinion Is Formed: Political Socialization A. Models of Political Socialization. Political socialization is the process by which individuals acquire political beliefs and attitudes. The interactions an individual has with others have a major impact on the formation of individual opinion. B. The Family and the Social Environment. The importance of the family is paramount in the development of individual opinion. Political attitudes begin to develop in children and the major influence on these early values is the family. 1. Education as a Source of Political Socialization. Educational influence on political opinions is also important. Education introduces individuals to ideas outside of the home and outside of the local community. These new ideas may influence the individual to accept opinions that are different from those of the parents. 2. Peers and Peer Group Influence. As people interact with others in school, at work or in social activities, various values come into play. These values can influence how opinions are formed. 3. Opinion Leaders’ Influence. Leaders, both formal and informal, also tend to shape the opinions of the public. Formal leaders include political leaders like the president, governors, and members of Congress. Formal leaders make a conscious effort to shape the opinions of the public. Informal leaders may not necessarily attempt to shape the political opinions of the public, but they still exert an influence on opinion formation. Examples of informal leaders are teachers, religious leaders, and civic leaders. C. The Impact of the Media. The media also play a significant role in the political socialization. The media present information on important political topics. How topics are presented and which topics are presented have a major impact in opinion formation. D. The Influence of Political Events. Generally older Americans tend to be somewhat more conservative than younger Americans, particularly on social and economic issues. This is known as the lifestyle effect. Political events can produce a long-lasting impact on opinion formation. An important example was the impact of the Great Depression on people who came of age in that period. We call such an impact a generational effect, or a cohort effect. While it is likely that the events of September 11, 2001 will play an important role in the political socialization of young Americans, it is still unclear what this impact will be. III. Political Preferences and Voting Behavior. The candidate and political party that individuals decide to support are influenced in part by certain demographic and socioeconomic factors. A. Demographic Influences. Demographic traits exert a major influence over the development of one’s opinion. 1. Education. For years, higher education levels appeared to correlate with voting for Republican candidates. Since 1992, however, voters with higher levels of education have been voting increasingly Democratic, so that in the 2000 election, these voters were nearly evenly divided between Al Gore and George W. Bush. The reason seems to be that professionals (such as lawyers, physicians, professors, etc.) are trending Democratic. Therefore, persons with postgraduate degrees (necessary to many professionals) now often vote Democratic. Businesspeople have remained strongly Republican, however. Businesspeople are less likely to have postgraduate degrees, which is why the population with bachelor’s degrees continues to favor the Republicans. 2. The Influence of Economic Status. Economic status and occupation appear to influence political views. On issues of economic policy, individuals who have less income tend to favor liberal policies, while individuals of the upper middle class favor conservative policies. On cultural issues the reverse tends to be true. Those with less income are more conservative and those with higher incomes are more liberal. 3. Economic Status and Voting Behavior. The Democratic Party also tends to receive support from people employed as manual laborers and from union workers. 4. Religious Influence: Denomination. Religious influence appears to have a significant impact on the development of political opinions. For example, the Jewish community is likely to vote for Democratic candidates. Irreligious voters tend to be liberal on cultural issues, but to have mixed stands on economic issues. A century ago, Catholics were often Democrats and Protestants Republican, but little remains of that tradition. 5. Religious Influence: Religiosity and Evangelicals. Recent trends show that the level of devoutness (rather than denomination) correlated with voting. Those who attend church regularly are more likely to vote Republican, no matter what the denomination. This tendency does not apply to African Americans, however, who demonstrate both high levels of religious commitment and generally liberal politics. 6. The Influence of Race and Ethnicity. In general, members of minority groups favor the Democrats. African Americans do so by overwhelming margins. Hispanics are voting Democratic by about two to one, though the Cuban American vote is strongly Republican. Asian Americans tend to support the Democrats but often by narrow margins. American Muslims of Middle Eastern descent gave George Bush majority support in 2000 based on shared cultural conservatism, but went heavily for John Kerry in 2004 on the basis of civil liberties concerns. 7. The Gender Gap. Key term: the gender gap, or the difference between the percentage of women who vote for a particular candidate and the percentage of men who vote for the candidate. Since 1980 women have tended to give somewhat more support to Democratic candidates for president and men have given somewhat more support to the Republicans. Women have been more supportive of social spending and extending civil rights. They have also been more concerned than men about security in the wake of 9/11, however. Republicans have benefited from this and the gender gap in the 2004 election proved to be quite modest. 8. Reasons for the Gender Gap. Some researchers have argued that a decline in marriage rates and an increase in the number of divorces has depressed the income of many women, who tend to be helped economically by marriage. And indeed, single women appear to be unusually Democratic. Other researchers, however, note that the gender gap rises with education and that it persists among welleducated married women. 9. Geographic Region. In presidential elections, Democrats tend to get support from the Northeast and the West Coast. Republicans do well in the South, the Great Plains, and the Rocky Mountains. The Midwest tends to split (and sometimes decides elections). Even more importantly, cities are typically Democratic while the countryside in most places is Republican. B. Election-Specific Factors 1. Party Identification. This is the strongest determinant of an individual’s vote. If an individual identifies with a particular party, there is a greater likelihood this person will vote and support the candidates of that party. 2. Perception of the Candidates. The candidate who is more successful in projecting an image that the public wants has a better chance of winning the election. Typically, these traits have to do with character, especially trustworthiness. 3. Issue Preferences. Although not as important as party identification or image, where a candidate stands on a given issue does have an impact on voters. Economic issues are often the most important. Some voters may cast votes based on their own economic interests, while others will vote based on what is happening to the nation’s economy as a whole. IV. Measuring Public Opinion A. The History of Opinion Polls. As early as the 1800s, the press conducted “straw polls.” Such polls were not an accurate reflection of public opinion. The Literary Digest conducted the most infamous of these in 1936. Franklin Roosevelt was elected in a landslide after the poll conducted by the Digest had projected his defeat. The Digest’s sample, taken from its readership, was not representative of the entire nation. In the 1930s, however, relatively accurate polling techniques were developed by George Gallup, Elmo Roper, and others. Survey research centers were set up at several universities after World War II. B. Sampling Techniques 1. Representative Sampling. To accurately predict the whole based on only a sample, the sample must be representative. 2. The Principle of Randomness. A purely random sample will be representative within the stated margin of error. For a poll to be random, every person in the defined population has to have an equal chance of being selected. The larger the sample of the population, the smaller the margin of error. If a random sample, with a margin of error of + or - 3%, reveals that 63% of the population favors a reduction in spending for space exploration, the actual number of people favoring such a reduction is somewhere between 60% to 66%. Making sure that a sample is random is a major task. A technique known as quota sampling may depart from the random model, and thus be less accurate. In quota sampling, researchers decide how many persons of certain types they need in the survey—such as minorities, women, or farmers—and then send out interviewers to find the necessary number of these types. Within the categories, the sample may be nonrandom and therefore biased. C. Problems with Polls. While random samples are usually accurate, there can still be problems. If the margin of error is greater than the difference between two candidates, the poll cannot indicate who is leading at that time. Polls are only accurate for the time frame when they were conducted. In the case of an issue in which public opinion changes quickly, the length of time the poll will be accurate will be very short. 1. Sampling Errors. Key concept: sampling error, or the difference between a sample’s results and the true result if the entire population had been interviewed. There exists danger if the sample is too small or if the polltakers do not know how to correct for common biases in samples. 2. Poll Questions. The design of a question can affect the result. Yes/no answers are a problem if the issue involves shades of gray. Often, people will attempt to please the interviewer and provide answers that are not indicative of their true beliefs. 3. Push Polls. Push polls are not polls at all, but are attempts to spread negative views about a candidate. V. Technology and Opinion Polls A. The Advent of Telephone Polling. Telephone polling is far easier and less expensive than door-to-door polling, and has become standard. 1. Telephone Polling Problems. The telemarketing industry has now become so pervasive that people increasingly refuse to respond. Almost half of households now use caller ID or some form of call screening, reducing the number of people that polling organizations can reach. In addition, the popularity of cell phones means an even greater quantity of numbers that polling organizations can’t reach. 2. Nonresponse Rates Have Skyrocketed. The nonresponse rate has reached 80% in some cases. A poll in which only 20% of the audience is reached can hardly be considered to involve a random sample. B. Enter Internet Polling. Harris has attempted to design Internet polls that properly weigh respondents to produce an accurate result. However, much of the population is not online (for example, less than half of all African American men) so many observers believe that the Harris effort cannot be made acceptable. It must be noted however that the online population grows to resemble the population of the nation daily. 1. “Nonpolls” on the Internet. There are many unscientific straw polls on the Internet. 2. Will Internet Polling Contribute to the Devaluation of Polling Results? With the proliferation of unscientific Internet polls there is a risk that people will cease to regard them as believable and to cynically question all polls. VI. Public Opinion and the Political Process A. Political Culture and Popular Opinion. Political culture can be described as a set of attitudes and ideas about the nation and government. Certain shared beliefs about important values are considered the core of American political culture. They bind the nation together despite its highly diverse population. These values include liberty, equality, and property; support for religion; and community service and personal achievement. 1. Political Culture and Support for Our Political System. General popular belief that the presidential election of 2000 would be settled fairly is an example of how a general sense of support for our political system allows the nation to weather a crisis. 2. Political Trust. General levels of trust in government have gone up and down. Levels were high immediately following 9/11 but were much lower in the wake of the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal. B. Public Opinion about Government. It is clear that there is considerable ambivalence on the part of the public regarding government and other national institutions. Recent data suggests that trust in government peaked after 9/11 but dropped thereafter. Over the years the military and churches have been the institutions receiving the highest levels of public confidence. After 9/11, confidence in the military reached new highs. Confidence in churches was hurt in 2002 by a series of sexual abuse scandals. Banks and the Supreme Court also score highly, while the media, Congress, labor unions, and business come off more poorly. To a great degree public opinion on the leading problems facing the nation is a reflection of the issues covered by the media. C. Public Opinion and Policymaking. What role should public opinion play in the political process? Should political leaders rely on public opinion polls to make public policy? The general public believes the leadership should pay attention to popular opinion. Leaders themselves are less likely to believe this. 1. Setting Limits on Government Action. Public opinion may be at its strongest in preventing politicians from embracing highly unpopular policies. 2. The Limits of Polling. There are differences of opinion between the public and policymakers on this issue. Part of the difference stems from one of the flaws of polling: poll questions largely ignore the context within which most policy decisions take place. That is, people are likely to express opinions on many kinds of policies without being required to consider the costs or a choice of trade-offs. VII. Features A. What If . . . Students Were Required to Pass a National Civics Exam? Although requiring students to pass a national civics exam would in all likelihood produce a population with greater knowledge about our system and increased turnout in elections, it would also produce any number of problems, including the determination of who would teach the government courses that would produce this knowledge. The increase in the amount spent on classes dealing with civics could very well result in a decrease in the funds available for teaching in other important areas. B. Which Side Are You On? The Media and Agenda Setting. One of the most frequently voiced complaints about the media is that it imposes its own agenda upon an unsuspecting and unquestioning American public, although some respond that with the emergence of the Internet it is now possible for Americans to easily do the research necessary to make their own determinations about the most important issues. C. Politics and Polls—The Issue of Push Polls. Sometimes a poll is not an attempt to ascertain what the people think, but rather an attempt to influence what the people think by exposing them to false information presented as questions. This is the case with “push polls.” Although such a manipulation may be unethical, it is not illegal. In fact, the use of push polls is growing at the local, state and national level. D. Beyond Our Borders: World Opinion of the United States The world view of the United States after 9/11 was decidedly favorable but began to sour with the invasion of Iraq. By 2006 the world’s opinion of the United States, and of George W. Bush, was quite unfavorable, especially among Arab and Muslim nations. Lecture This chapter deals with the formation of public opinion and its influence upon the American political system. A major theme is that public opinion is a powerful and yet inexact force in American politics. The chapter’s main points are: Public opinion consists of those views held by ordinary citizens that are openly expressed. Public officials have many means of gauging public opinion but increasingly have relied on public opinion polls to make this determination. The process by which individuals acquire their political opinions is called political socialization. This process begins in childhood, when, through family and school, Americans acquire many of their basic political values and beliefs. Socialization continues unto adulthood, during which peers, political institutions and leaders, and the news media are major influences. Americans’ political opinions are shaped by several frames of reference. Four of the most important are ideology, group attachments, partisanship, and political culture. These frames of reference form the basis for political consensus and conflict among the general public. Public opinion has an important influence on government but ordinarily does not directly determine what officials will do. Public opinion works primarily to impose limits and directions on the choices made by officials. Take the role of public opinion during the Iraqi War and particularly its influence upon President Bush’s actions during that crisis, for example. Public opinion consists of those views held by ordinary citizens which government takes into account in making its decisions. However, public opinion in America is not homogeneous—there are many "publics" and opinion may be lacking, contradictory, or only applicable to major issues. So, it is relatively difficult to run a government by relying on "majority" opinion. Public officials do have many ways of assessing public opinion, such as election outcomes or mass demonstrations. However, officials have found opinion polls to be more reliable. Modern polls are based upon a representative, randomly selected sample that in turn mirrors the opinion characteristics contained in a much larger "population." For example, the Gallup Poll only interviews a thousand or so carefully-selected individuals who in turn represent millions of American voters. Polls are not infallible—they can be invalidated through poor wording of questions, unrepresentative sampling, or other ways. (See OLC simulation, "Updating an Opinion Poll," at www.mhhe.com/patterson5.) However, a properly conducted poll can provide an accurate indication of what the public is thinking and can dissuade political leaders from believing that the views of the most vocal citizen are also the views of the broader public. Polls can also indicate to leaders the direction, intensity, or stability of opinions. Public opinion has a significant influence on government but seldom determines exactly what government will do in a particular instance. Public opinion serves to constrain the policy choices of officials. Some policy actions are beyond the range of possibility because the public will not accept change in existing policy or will not seriously consider policy that seems clearly at odds with basic American values. Evidence indicates that officials are reasonably attentive to public opinion on highly visible and controversial issues of public policy. Finally, the question remains as to whether government is sufficiently responsive to public opinion. This chapter also focuses on political participation and its various forms. It highlights voting as the most common form of political activity, examining the impact of registration, civic duty, party competition, socioeconomic status, and other important factors on voter turnout. The chapter examines differences in the extent of political participation, emphasizing the effects of both individual and systemic factors. The main points of this chapter are: Voter turnout in U.S. elections is low in comparison with that of other democratic nations. The reasons for this difference include the nature of U.S. election laws, particularly those pertaining to registration requirements and the scheduling of elections. Most citizens do not participate actively in politics in ways other than voting. Only a small proportion of Americans can be classified as political activists. Most Americans make a sharp distinction between their personal lives and national life. This attitude reduces their incentive to participate and contributes to a pattern of participation dominated by citizens with higher levels of income and education. Political participation is sharing in activities designed to influence public policy and leadership. A main issue of democratic government is the question of who participates in politics and how fully they participate. Voting is the most widespread form of active political participation among Americans. (See OLC simulation "Redistricting," at www.mhhe.com/patterson5.) Yet voter turnout is significantly lower in the United States than in other democratic nations. The requirement that Americans must personally register in order to establish their eligibility to vote is one reason for lower turnout among Americans; other democracies place the burden of registration on governmental officials rather than on the individual citizen. The fact that the U.S. holds frequent elections also discourages some citizens from voting regularly. Finally, the major American political parties, unlike many of those in Europe, do not clearly represent the interests of opposing economic classes; thus the policy stakes in American elections are correspondingly reduced. Some Americans do not vote because they think that policy will not change greatly regardless of which party gains power. Only a minority of citizens engage in the more demanding forms of political activity, such as working on behalf of a candidate during a political campaign, taking an active part in the community, or closely following political news through traditional media and/or the Internet. The proportion of Americans who engage in these more demanding forms of activity exceeds the proportion of Europeans who do so. (However, some scholars believe that the level of civic involvement is falling in the United States, with potentially adverse effects for democracy here.) Nevertheless, only about five in every twenty Americans will take an active part in a political organization at some point in their lives, although perhaps no more than one in twenty is highly active in politics at any given time. Most political activists are individuals of higher income and education; they have the skills and material resources to participate effectively and tend to have a greater interest in politics. More than in any other Western democracy, political participation in the United States is related to socioeconomic status. Prospective voting is one way the public can exert influence through elections. It is the most demanding approach to voting: Voters must develop their own policy preferences and then must educate themselves about the candidates’ positions. The voters must also set aside other considerations, such as the candidates’ personalities. The degree of prospective voting rises and falls with the importance of the issues of the day, but the electorate as a whole is generally not well informed about the candidates’ stands and is only partially inclined to vote for candidates on the basis of policies they advocate. Retrospective voting demands less from voters: They need only decide whether the government has been performing well or poorly in terms of the goals and values they hold. The evidence suggests that the electorate is, in fact, reasonably sensitive to past governmental performance, particularly in relation to economic prosperity, and that such judgments affect voting to a significant degree, especially in presidential elections. Social movements are broad efforts to achieve change by citizens who feel that government is not properly responsive to their interests. These efforts sometimes take place outside established channels; demonstrations, picket lines, and marches are common means of protest. Protesters are younger and more idealistic on average than other citizens, but they are very small proportion of the population. In addition, protest activities do not have much public support, despite the country’s tradition of free expression. Overall, Americans are only moderately involved in politics. They are concerned with political affairs but immersed in their private pursuits, a reflection in part of our culture’s emphasis on individualism. The lower level of participation among poorer citizens has particular significance in that it works to reduce their influence on public policy and leadership. Political Spectrum Left Radical Center Liberal Moderate Right Conservative Reactionary Radical--Favors extreme change to create an entirely new social system Liberal--Believes that government must take action to change economic, political, and ideological policies that may be unfair Moderate -- Opposed to extreme or radical views or measures. Middle of the road Conservative—Seeks to keep in place the economic, political, and ideological structures of society Reactionary – favors extreme change to restore society to an earlier state Political Spectrum Radical Liberal Left Wing Centrist Moderate Conservative Reactionary Right Wing Public Opinion Public Opinion, the expressed views of a group of people about issues of common interest or concern. Opinion is not subject to verifiable proof. It commonly represents a value judgment or preference, or an estimate of the outcome of future events. Private opinions cannot form a part of public opinion unless they are expressed in some way. There can be no public opinion about individual concerns unless these concerns become of common interest. The relevant public is most often considered to be the adult citizenry of a political unit such as a town, or a nation. But one may also speak of neighborhood public opinion, public opinion within various subgroups of a population, or even world public opinion. Although opinions, attitudes, and values are often compared or confused, most authorities regard attitudes as more fundamental generalized predispositions, opinions as specific manifestations of underlying attitudes, and values as people's ideals and the commitments they make to pursue them. A person's expressed opinion will normally reflect his or her attitude toward the issue, although, for reasons of social or political pressure, that person may conceal his or her attitude or express a contrary opinion. Attitudes themselves are products of cultural, social, and psychological factors affecting each individual. Values often involve religious beliefs, standards for interpersonal relations, or moral and ethical judgments. All three enter into the formation of public opinion in the term's broadest sense. When an event occurs or an issue arises, values may be tested, individual attitudes are activated, public discussion ensues, attitudes and values are modified or strengthened, and public opinion is formed. Opinion is most often characterized with respect to direction, intensity, breadth, and depth. Direction refers to the for-or-against continuum; opinion can be described as preponderantly favorable or unfavorable or divided with respect to an issue. Intensity refers to the strength with which an opinion is held. Breadth refers to its scope or generality; opinion can be highly specific to a particular issue, or it can be generalized, so that opinions on many related issues reinforce one another. The depth of opinion refers to its anchorage in the individual's system of values. It differs from intensity in that an opinion may be strongly held yet susceptible to change through the influence of contrary evidence, while deeply rooted opinions are much more difficult to shift. Public opinion depends on freedom of communication and expression. If communication is difficult or restricted, public opinion is less likely to form or change. Thus public opinion is usually more powerful in a free, open, and advanced society than it is in a primitive or a closed society though even in the latter it cannot be ignored. In the United States, a nation whose government is explicitly held to derive its powers from "the consent of the governed," political leaders and students of government early recognized the need for some means of knowing what people were thinking and saying. Abraham Lincoln said: "What I want to get done is what the people desire to have done, and the question for me is how to find that out exactly." British historian James Bryce wrote in 1888: "The obvious weakness of government by public opinion is the difficulty of ascertaining it." Efforts to ascertain public opinion have long been characteristic of a democratic society. As the society has become more affluent and more knowledgeable and its problems more complex, the techniques used by public opinion researchers have become more sophisticated and more precise. The findings of the major public opinion polls today are more reliable and more revealing than could have been imagined in an earlier time. Their obvious contribution has been to substitute objective measurement of people's opinions and behavior for the guesswork that once surrounded these matters. Survey evidence may still be ambiguous or misleading, but it is no longer possible for minority pressure groups to claim popular support, because polling organizations have the ability to acquire objective evidence. Nor is it any longer necessary for business people, educators, political candidates, or government officials to proceed on the basis of subjective estimates of the public's knowledge, interests, or opinion. Users of Public Opinion Research. Public opinion research is probably best known to the public through the reports of the Gallup Poll and the Harris Survey whose syndicated releases appear regularly in newspapers and magazines throughout the United States. These surveys publish findings about public opinion with respect to social, political, and economic issues, and they have charted changes in public opinion over a period of years. The Gallup Poll, for example, asks a cross section of the public almost every month whether they approve or disapprove of the performance of the incumbent president. Interest in the published polls peaks with each presidential election, when Gallup and Harris run "trial heats" between candidates in the preconvention period to determine the size and nature of support behind each candidate, and then provide regular reports on the progress of the election campaign. Candidates for public office also rely heavily on public opinion surveys to sharpen their campaign appeals and to guide the allocation of their limited time and resources. Despite the publicity given to the published polls, by far the biggest users of public opinion research are business and industry. Many companies have their own research departments or combine the function with advertising or marketing. Their interests range from attempts to measure the effects of their advertising, to controlled tests of new products, or to efforts to understand and improve their public image. Newspapers, magazines, and broadcasters use surveys to ascertain the opinions as well as the size and characteristics of their audiences. Except for a period during World War II, there has never been, as in Britain and France, a special government agency in the United States responsible for surveying public opinion. But federal departments sponsor a great deal of opinion and attitude research. The federal government first encouraged such surveys when it established a congressional mandate that set aside funds for evaluation of the many social programs that were initiated in the 1960s. Since then, federal, state, and local governments have increasingly funded surveys to assist them in setting priorities and monitoring the results of established programs. A final group of survey users are private foundations, voluntary agencies, sociologists, and political scientists. Their interest is usually in broad social trends, in the determinants of social decisions, and in the structure and effects of the opinion process itself. Sociologists frequently use public opinion polls to measure such phenomena as ethnic and religious prejudice. Political scientists, for example, utilize public opinion surveys to study voting decisions and to examine the makeup of political party coalitions. Public Opinion Research Methods. The basic methods of public opinion research are questionnaires, interviewers, and samples. The least expensive method of polling is the mail questionnaire. This type of poll is effective, especially when a lengthy or a complex set of questions needs to be answered by a very interested group, but this approach frequently yields low returns and a slow response rate. While the Gallup and Roper organizations still conduct much of their interviewing in respondents' homes, telephone interviewing has become the preferred polling method. It is far less expensive and more efficient than in-person interviewing. Polling organizations also use different types of samples to measure public opinion. The earliest polls relied on the quota method whereby census information was used to find the distribution of the population by such attributes as age, education, or income. National samples of the United States usually include from 1,500 to 3,000 interviews. If each household or individual has a known and equal probability of being selected, then such a relatively small number of persons will accurately reflect with only a small potential margin for error the opinions of the total population. Although the quota method of selecting a sample is still used, polling organizations now rely on probability principles to select their samples. Applied to telephone interviewing, this method translates into random-digit dialing, whereby the polling organization works with a telephone company to obtain three-digit prefixes and assigned banks of the latter four digits. Questionnaires have become more refined as researchers have moved from simple referendum-like questions to attempts to measure all dimensions of public opinion. Respondents may be asked about their perceptions of the issue, the amount and sources of their information, their attitudes toward related issues, or their readiness to act on their views. They may be asked to choose from a number of statements the one that comes closest to their opinion, to rank various issues in order of importance, or to answer a battery of agree-disagree items. They may even be given word-association or sentence-completion tests to reveal underlying attitudes. Most interviews conclude with questions to ascertain such facts as the respondent's occupation, education, and age, for subsequent use in analysis. Survey data are normally fed into a computer and processed electronically. Advances in technology allow data to be keyed directly from questionnaire to machine. Once stored in the computer, the survey data can be subjected to endless analysis. Standardized software programs are available to produce statistical tables with great speed and economy. Criticisms of Public Opinion Research. Critics often argue that surveying methods are subject to bias because it all depends on how you ask the question. Furthermore, how does one know that people are telling the truth? Both dangers exist, but in the hands of a professional polltaker the risks are minimized. Biased surveys commonly result from ignorance or design. They should be detected by alert editors and readers. In any case their influence will be diminished by publication of more accurate polls. As for validity of replies, researchers point to cross-checks on consistency of opinions, to routine validation measures, and to the privacy and confidentiality of the interview situation. Empirically, they point to the excellent record of election forecasts and to the increasing use of survey techniques by business and government to acquire necessary information. Critics have also charged that it is idle to poll a sample of people about an issue and then add up the answers, as if all respondents had equal knowledge, involvement, and influence. While basically defending a philosophy of "sampling one person, one vote" in a democratic society, most researchers recognize the validity of this criticism. But they point to questions on their questionnaires designed to measure just such characteristics as knowledge, interest, and influence, in order that these can be controlled in their analysis of the findings. Some critics accept but fear the accuracy of public opinion research. They argue that officials will abandon their leadership role and will follow the shifting majorities of the public on every issue; that minority thought will be stifled as publication of survey findings leads people to accept the majority views; and that research results can be used to manipulate the public against its own best interests. None can say that such fears are groundless, but researchers reply that some leaders have always sought to follow public opinion or to manipulate it, and these always will. And they point to many examples of minority viewpoints that ultimately become the prevailing sentiment of the public. Finally, researchers point out that if there were no scientifically conducted polls, some less accurate method of ascertaining public opinion would have to be relied on instead. History of Public Opinion Research. The origins of public opinion research in the United States are generally traced to newspaper straw votes; the earliest recorded example occurred in 1824. By 1900 it was not uncommon for newspapers to enliven their election coverage by asking readers to fill out and return straw ballots. The popularity of these local polls led national magazines to attempt their own. The Farm Journal was first, in 1912, but from 1916 to 1936 the Literary Digest was foremost in the field. It regularly forecasted election results correctly, and surveyed public opinion on such issues as prohibition. During the 1936 presidential campaign, the Digest mailed more than 10 million ballots to telephone subscribers and automobile owners, and more than 2 million returns were tabulated. But the result was a fiasco. Not only did the survey predict that the Republican candidate, Alfred M. Landon, would win, but it overestimated his percentage of the vote by about 20%. Landon carried only two states. For more than 100 years, efforts to ascertain public opinion had relied on straw ballots, sidewalk surveys, or mail questionnaires. The weakness of all these methods, dramatically illustrated by the Digest's performance in 1936, lay in their failure to guard against a biased sample of replies. In 1936, telephone subscribers and automobile owners tended to be more affluent and to vote Republican. Less-affluent and less-educated voters were badly underrepresented in the Digest's final sample. A further weakness of the early polls was their practice of cumulating ballots throughout the campaign, so that those cast in August had the same weight as those cast in October. Modern Techniques. In the same election that embarrassed the Digest, three newcomers to political polling accurately forecasted the result. These were the American Institute of Public Opinion, founded by George Gallup a year earlier; the Fortune Survey, conducted by Paul Cherington and Elmo Roper; and the Crossley Poll, under the direction of Archibald Crossley. They achieved their results by means of personal interviews with small but selected samples of voters. By assigning specific quotas of men and women to be interviewed in various age groups and economic levels, these polltakers avoided most of the biases that had invalidated the Digest's huge sample. The new methods had been pioneered by advertising and marketing researchers a decade or more earlier. The first serious efforts at consumer research had begun in the 1920s, and by 1936 many companies were conducting personal interviews with selected samples of consumers. The success of these three national polls led to a vast expansion of public opinion research. Polls were no longer regarded as mere editorial features to pique reader interest in the outcome of an election. Gallup's thrice-weekly releases through a national newspaper syndicate poured out a constant stream of findings on public opinion, beliefs, expectations, and behavior with respect to many issues. For many years, the Fortune survey did the same each month. In 1941 the National Opinion Research Center was established as the first noncommercial opinion research agency. Polls sponsored by newspapers were established in several states. Government Uses. The first regular use of public opinion research by government occurred in 1939, when the U.S. Department of Agriculture established a Division of Program Surveys to study farm opinion. Directed by Rensis Likert, the division developed techniques that have become standard. These included probability sampling methods, which reduced interviewers' freedom of choice in obtaining respondents; more frequent use of openended rather than yes-or-no questions; and batteries of questions to form a scale of opinion instead of reliance on a single question. In 1942, during World War II, the Office of War Information established a Surveys Division that conducted more than 100 studies of civilian knowledge, attitudes, and expectations concerning wartime problems. During the same period a U.S. Army research branch studied troop morale. These government surveys utilized the specialized insights of sociologists, psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and mathematical statisticians. The wartime research programs contributed enormously both to an understanding of how opinions are formed and changed and to the further development of techniques of public opinion research. Developments after World War II. In 1946, Harry Field, director of the National Opinion Research Center, called a conference in Central City, Colo., attended by about 75 academicians, commercial researchers, and government officials. They discussed the role of public opinion research in local, national, and international affairs; problems of sampling, interviewing, and questionnaire writing; and the reliability and validity of data. In 1947 the American Association for Public Opinion Research was founded. The Public Opinion Quarterly, begun by Princeton University in 1937, serves as the association's journal. Public opinion research suffered a setback when the forecasts of a victory for the Republican presidential candidate, Thomas E. Dewey, were proved wrong in 1948. A committee appointed by the Social Science Research Council attributed the faulty result mainly to failure to catch the late trend toward Pres. Harry Truman, to assess properly the intentions of the "undecided," and to estimate correctly the voting turnout. After 1948 the polltakers worked on more reliable methods for estimating turnout and took care to continue their soundings right up to election day. The major polls have correctly predicted most of the election winners since the 1950s and have generally been accurate when they estimated that elections would be extremely close. The availability and use of public opinion research have continued to expand. Some sort of survey research facility now exists at almost every major university in the United States with the capability of carrying out local or statewide surveys. In every major city commercial research companies conduct surveys for business, for government agencies, or for private groups. The proliferation of surveys has brought with it problems of quality and standards. In a free market anyone can sell survey services, and price competition usually ensures the adoption of minimum standards. Similarly, there are no legal barriers to the widespread release of spurious survey data based on poorly worded questions or biased samples. The problems are regarded as serious because surveys are finally dependent on the willingness of the general public to respond conscientiously to the polltaker's questions. If sizable segments of the public come to believe that surveys are a sales or propaganda device or an invasion of their privacy, the state of public opinion could again be measured only indirectly. Efforts to improve public understanding and to eliminate survey abuses are being made by professional associations in the field of public opinion. They have sought to educate legislators, editors, and business leaders about the characteristics of an acceptable survey; encourage polltakers to be more sensitive to the needs and interests of the people they interview; continue development of a widely agreed-on set of survey standards and code of professional ethics; and formulate and apply sanctions against researchers found in violation of accepted principles. See also Advertising; Propaganda; Public Relations. Paul B. Sheatsley* Senior Survey Director National Opinion Research Center Bibliography Gallup, George H., Jr., ed., The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion (Scholarly Resources, annually). Ginsberg, Benjamin, The Captive Public: How Mass Opinion Promotes State Power (Basic Bks. 1986). Hennessey, Bernard C., Public Opinion, 5th ed. (Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. 1985). Key, V. O., Public Opinion and American Democracy (Knopf 1963). Lake, Celinda, and Pat Harper, Public Opinion Polling: Who, Why, How? (Island Press 1986). Mills, Stephen, and Roger Williams, Public Acceptance of New Technologies (Longwood 1986). Noelle-Neumann, E., The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion Our Social Skin (Univ. of Chicago Press 1986). Smith, M. J., and K. W. Thompson, eds., Consensus: Issues and Problems (Univ. Press of Am. 1986). Top of Page