This file is part of the online Capacity Development Toolkit to Strengthen National Entities to Implement National Disease Responses for HIV and AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. January 2012. Link: www.globalfundpartnership.org Monitoring & Evaluation Capacities The monitoring and evaluation capacity area consists of the following detailed capacities to be assessed and developed, which are sub-divided into components. Monitoring & Evaluation Capacities M&E coordination Scope: M&E management arrangements; effective M&E stakeholder and technical working groups; effective oversight and review of sub-reporting entities Indicators Scope: clear and measurable indicators with baselines, targets, measurement methods, and data sources; quality and comprehensiveness of indicators M&E work plan Scope: effective M&E plan with clearly defined activities, timelines, financial resource estimates, and responsibilities; processes to update the work plan M&E budget Scope: comprehensive, adequate, and feasible budget; resource sources and gaps Components Planning Managing Monitoring Forecasting Maintain and use adequate M&E accountability and oversight mechanisms Accountability & Oversight Comprehensive, clear and measurable indicators with baselines, targets, and measurement methods Indicators Up-to-date work plan with activities, timelines, responsibilities, resource estimates, and processes to update Work plans Comprehensive budget with resource sources and gaps Budgeting Effectively plan, manage, monitor, and forecast M&E operations with clear structures, roles, and responsibilities 1 Monitoring & Evaluation Capacities M&E tools and guidelines Scope: M&E guidelines and standard operating procedures; adequate procedures and responsibilities for collecting and aggregating data at subnational levels; registers, data collection and reporting forms from service delivery point to central level; tools and guidelines for data quality assurance, surveys, and program evaluation M&E human resources Scope: adequate M&E human resource staffing and skill levels; adequate structures, roles and responsibilities for data collection, monitoring, and reporting; plans for addressing human resource gaps Routine data collection, analysis and reporting Scope: effective data collection, analysis and reporting processes, including data repository, backup system, data compilation, processing and analysis; adequate report flows from service delivery point to central level; ability to produce timely and accurate reports; effective data analysis systems and responsibilities Data quality assurance and M&E related supportive supervision Scope: feasible and comprehensive data quality assurance strategy; effective data quality assurance procedures; timely data quality assurance reviews; data quality checks at sub-national level Evaluation, operational research, Components Follow Global Fund M&E requirements as well as organisation M&E policies and procedures Policies & Procedures Recruit, maintain, and develop knowledge of staff to implement M&E operations (National, Regional, & District/Local) Recruit M&E Staff Collect and record programmatic data with appropriate quality control measures: Access existing data sources/bases for sex, age and geographical disaggregated data Maintain & Develop M&E Staff Programmatic Disaggregated Behavioural & Health Data Collection Data Quality Control When necessary, through sentinel surveillance, qualitative studies and operational research Support the preparation of regular and reliable programmatic reports Effective data quality assurance strategy, procedures, reviews, and verification processes Data Quality Assurance Schedules for evaluations, research, surveys, studies, and reviews Evaluation Scheduling 2 Programmatic Behavioural & Health Data Analysis & Reporting Monitoring & Evaluation Capacities surveys, surveillance, special studies Scope: schedules for program evaluations, operational research and program reviews; schedules for surveys and studies Evaluation Scope: adequate systems for independent evaluations; ability to review and respond to evaluation recommendations Information products, dissemination and use Scope: clear information products and dissemination methods; M&E results inform management decisions; systems to integrate evaluation results into planning Alignment with and contribution to national M&E system Scope: M&E plan linked to national strategy; M&E plans and operations follow, use, or integrate with national M&E systems Components Make data available for the purpose of evaluations and other studies Effective policies and systems for timely independent evaluations, and mechanisms for acting on recommendations Manage knowledge to make it accessible, so it can be used in the design and implementation of programs Program and grant-level plans and operations use national M&E guidelines and systems Data & Information Sharing Evaluation Conduct & Followup Knowledge Capture & Organisation Knowledge Sharing M&E Integration Indicators For the each of the capacity components in Monitoring & Evaluation, the following table outlines points for consideration and example indicators. This table can be used as an initial confirmation or checklist when conducting a capacity assessment or defining a capacity development plan. 3 Indicators are classified into four different categories: value for money (including sub categories of effectiveness, efficiency and additionality), risk mitigation, organisational management, and sustainability1. Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Capacity: Effectively plan, manage, monitor, and forecast M&E operations with clear structures, roles, and responsibilities Planning Currency and use of annual M&E plans Value for Money Effectiveness Coordination and integration of national M&E planning with Global Fund M&E planning Efficiency Additionality Availability and currency of M&E plans Frequency of M&E plan reviews and updates Level of integration of M&E plans with budgets and management plans Staff and effort required per year in M&E planning Level of integration of Global Fund M&E planning with national M&E planning processes M&E plans include risk definition, analysis, and tracking Schedule of partner reviews of M&E plans Organisational Management Availability of M&E planning guidelines and procedures Sustainability Schedule of M&E planning learning events Risk Mitigation Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to conduct M&E planning These categories cover the scope of capacity measurement under the headings of stability (organisational management and risk mitigation), performance (effectiveness and efficiency), and adaptability (sustainability) as defined by UNDP in: Measuring Capacity, UNDP, July 2010. 4 Capacity Components Managing Points to Consider Clarity in definition and understanding of M&E team roles and responsibilities Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Timeliness of M&E reports Improvements in timeliness of M&E reporting How M&E data analysis is used in making management decisions M&E performance metrics in place Efficiency Improvements in M&E performance metrics M&E team ToRs defined and clearly understood M&E management to staff ratios Additionality Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Level of integration of Global Fund M&E management with national M&E management processes Percentage of M&E activities performed through government and other donor funding M&E risks identified, analysed, prioritised, tracked, and mitigation plans in place Frequency of audit and external reviews of M&E systems Availability and transparency of M&E data for management and partner review Availability and use of M&E policies and procedures Frequency of updates of M&E policies and procedures 5 Number of staff and effort per year required for M&E functions Sustainability Degree of use of computerised systems for M&E functions Schedule of updates for M&E policies and procedures guidelines Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support M&E management Schedule of M&E management team learning Percentage of staff with M&E certification Turnover rates for M&E management Capacity Components Monitoring Points to Consider M&E results and performance metrics Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Integration of programmatic reporting with budget and management reporting M&E reports and analysis available for management meetings Use, timeliness, and accuracy of information used for monitoring Efficiency Additionality Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Forecasting Use of historical data analysis and forecasting data in M&E planning Schedule of M&E monitoring reviews Value for Money Currency and quality of M&E information Improvements in timeliness of M&E reporting A national set of indicators with targets and annual reporting to inform annual health sector reviews and other planning cycles Time and effort to conduct M&E monitoring activities Level of integration of Global Fund M&E monitoring with national M&E monitoring processes Percentage of monitoring activities performed through government and other donor funding Schedule of review of monitoring activities and procedures Clear monitoring roles and responsibilities Monitoring policies and procedures Schedule of M&E monitoring learning events Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to conduct M&E monitoring Effectiveness Availability of M&E data analysis Availability of M&E forecast data Efficiency Time and effort required in M&E forecasting Availability of forecasting systems Additionality Risk Mitigation 6 Level of integration of Global Fund M&E forecasting with national procedures and systems Schedule of partner reviews of M&E forecasting and analysis methods Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Organisational Management Clear forecasting roles and responsibilities Availability of M&E forecasting guidelines and procedures Sustainability Schedule of M&E analysis and forecasting learning events Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to conduct M&E analysis and forecasting Capacity: Maintain and use adequate M&E accountability and oversight mechanisms Accountability & Oversight Defined M&E accountability structures Value for Money Effectiveness Evidence of enforcement Capabilities and schedules of audit units to oversee Effectiveness and timeliness of management responses to M&E evaluations and audits Level of coordination and communication with oversight bodies Efficiency Additionality Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Clear M&E management accountability structures from National to Regional to District/Local levels Number of enforcement actions per year Number of partners and stakeholders involved in M&E oversight Percentage completion of M&E audits and reviews vs. plan A health systems performance assessment carried out within the past five years, with a strong national contribution Number of M&E oversight reviews per year Number of audit staff and effort per year to provide M&E oversight Percentage of oversight reviews conducted that are integrated with other oversight objectives (other donors, internal audit, etc.) Schedule of external reviews of accountability and oversight mechanisms Incidences and scale of noncompliance Documented audit and accountability policies and guidelines Schedule of accountability reviews and updates Turnover rates for audit staff Capacity: Comprehensive, clear and measurable indicators with baselines, targets, and measurement methods 7 Capacity Components Indicators Points to Consider Number and quality of M&E indicators Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Indicator verification and review processes Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Efficiency Additionality Quality and comprehensiveness of indicators Completeness in defining baselines and targets Measurement methods identified Time and effort required to define and measure indicators Degree of use of national indicators and systems in tracking required Global Fund indicators Schedule of external reviews of indicator frameworks Policies and guidelines for the identification of appropriate indicators Schedule of reviews of indicator policies and guidelines Capacity: Up-to-date work plan with activities, timelines, responsibilities, resource estimates, and processes to update Work plans Level of detail of work plans Value for Money Effectiveness Assignment of financial and human resources Basis for estimates Efficiency Additionality Clearly defined activities and targeted results to achieve Level of integration of M&E plans with budgets and management plans Time and effort required to develop and review M&E work plans Level of integration of Global Fund M&E work plans with national M&E work plans Risk Mitigation Schedule of partner reviews of M&E work plans Organisational Management Availability of M&E work plan policies and guidelines Sustainability Schedule of learning for M&E work plan development Capacity: Comprehensive budget with resource sources and gaps Budgeting Integration of M&E plans with budgets and management plans Value for Money Effectiveness Comprehensiveness and adequacy of the M&E budget Efficiency 8 Level of integration of M&E plans with budgets and management plans Currency of budget information Time and effort required to develop and maintain M&E budgets Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Additionality Level of integration of M&E budget for Global Fund with national M&E budget Risk Mitigation Schedule of internal and external budget reviews Organisational Management Availability of M&E budget policies and guidelines Sustainability Schedule of M&E budget learning Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to conduct budgeting Capacity: Follow Global Fund M&E requirements as well as organisation M&E policies and procedures Policies & Procedures Currency and use of M&E policies and procedures Value for Money M&E policies address decentralised operations and accountabilities Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Effectiveness Efficiency Additionality Currency and comprehensiveness of M&E policies and procedures Time and effort required to maintain M&E policies and procedures Level of integration of Global Fund M&E policies and procedures with national procedures and systems Schedule of partner reviews of M&E policies and procedures Consistency of M&E policies and procedures with international standards Availability of processes to maintain M&E policies, guidelines and procedures Schedule of M&E policies and procedures learning events Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to manage M&E policies and procedures Capacity: Recruit, maintain, and develop knowledge of staff to implement M&E operations (National, Regional, & District/Local) Recruit M&E Staff Clarity and simplicity of recruitment procedures Value for Money Effectiveness Recruitment timelines and bottlenecks Scope of recruitment searches Efficiency Additionality Staff contracts and incentives to retain 9 Percentage turnover per year Percentage or number of vacant posts Timing from recruitment posting to staffed positions Average time and effort required to recruit one staff member, by level Percentage or financial amount of staff recruited through the grant Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Maintain & Develop M&E Staff Experience levels of M&E staff Availability of alternative staffing solutions Availability of recruitment plans Availability of recruitment policies and procedures Schedule of recruitment policies and procedures reviews Value for Money Effectiveness Experience in M&E of funded programs similar to the Global Fund Staff development approaches Turnover percentages Staff satisfaction levels Schedule of external reviews of recruitment policies and procedures Efficiency Additionality Percentage turnover per year Percentage of staff who are on schedule with their individual Staff Development Plan Percentage of staff with management certification Financial team ToRs defined and clearly understood Use of e-learning courses Percentage or financial amount of staff funded through the grant Risk Mitigation Plans in place for tracking and maintaining staff Organisational Management Availability of mentoring programmes Availability of staff development plans Schedule of staff development Schedule of peer-to-peer and external learning sessions Staff satisfaction scores Sustainability Capacity: Collect and record programmatic data with appropriate quality control measures: (1) Access existing data sources/bases for sex, age and geographical disaggregated data, and (2) When necessary, through sentinel surveillance, qualitative studies and operational research 10 Capacity Components Programmatic Behavioural & Health Data Collection Points to Consider Existing sources of data: DHS, sentinel surveillance Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Data capture systems and data flows Data collection through qualitative studies, operational research Efficiency and timeliness of data collection Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Data Quality Control Accuracy and completeness of data capture Value for Money Efficiency Additionality Availability of national database with public and private sector health facilities and geocoding, updated within the past three years Availability of national database with health workers by district and main cadres updated within the past two years Level of use of data collection systems for studies and evaluations Behavioural, KAP, operational research reports Staff and effort required per year in data collection Percentage of data collection activities funded through the grant Availability of data collection policies and procedures Schedule and availability of learning resources for data collection and Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support data collection Effectiveness 11 Comprehensiveness and completeness of health data capture: prevalence., incidence,, qualitative social and behavioural data disaggregated by age and gender Percentage of data collection processes reviewed by or including audit or partner working groups Data quality control processes Quality and timeliness of health data Measures of data quality Percentage of data quality control measures at point of data capture Data quality assessments carried out and published within the past three years, using internationally agreed quality criteria such as the Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF) Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Efficiency Additionality Time and effort required for data quality control activities Level of integration of Global Fund data quality control activities with national procedures and systems Schedule of partner reviews of data quality control methods Availability of data quality control policies and procedures Schedule of data quality control learning Level of external support required for data quality control activities Capacity: Support the preparation of regular and reliable programmatic reports Programmatic Behavioural & Health Data Analysis & Reporting Analysis processes and systems Value for Money Effectiveness Integration and relevance of analysis in management reports Reporting systems and dissemination Reporting schedules and timeliness Efficiency Additionality Risk Mitigation Organisational Management 12 Timeliness and accuracy of health data reports Level of integration of health data into management and forecasting reports and processes Availability of historical analysis and projections of health data Percentage of districts that submit timely, complete, accurate reports to national level Percentage of computerisation in health data reporting and analysis Number of staff and effort per year required for data analysis and reporting Percentage of health data analysis and reporting activities funded through the grant Level of integration of Global Fund analysis and reporting with national systems and procedures Number and frequency of data analysis quality reviews Number of partner and stakeholder reviews of analysis and reporting systems Availability and currency of data analysis and reporting policies and procedures Capacity Components Points to Consider Indicator Type Example Indicators Sustainability Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support data analysis and reporting Capacity: Effective data quality assurance strategy, procedures, reviews, and verification processes Data Quality Assurance Regularity and comprehensiveness of data quality verification exercises Value for Money Effectiveness Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Efficiency Additionality Measures of data quality Frequency and number of data verification exercises Time and effort required for data quality assurance activities Level of integration of Global Fund data quality assurance activities with national procedures and systems Schedule of partner reviews of data quality assurance methods Level of partner participation in data quality review exercises Availability of data quality assurance policies and procedures Schedule of data quality assurance learning Level of external support required for data quality assurance activities Capacity: Schedules for evaluations, research, surveys, studies, and reviews Evaluation Scheduling Schedule of evaluations Value for Money Effectiveness Efficiency Additionality Integrated schedule of evaluations, operational research, and other studies Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Time and effort required for evaluation planning Percentage of evaluation planning activities funded through the grant Level of integration of Global Fund evaluation planning with national evaluation schedules Schedule of partner reviews and participation in evaluation scheduling Availability of evaluation scheduling policies and procedures Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support evaluation scheduling Capacity: Make data available for the purpose of evaluations and other studies 13 Percentage of evaluations completed per plan Capacity Components Points to Consider Data & Information Sharing Availability of data and information for evaluations and for external use Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Efficiency Additionality Percentage of evaluations available publicly Availability of data for evaluations external analysis Time and effort required for making data available for evaluations and external studies Level of integration of Global Fund data with national systems for evaluation use Schedule of partner reviews of evaluation data sharing plans and systems Availability of policies and procedures for making data available for evaluations and studies Schedule of learning for data sharing systems and procedures Capacity: Effective policies and systems for timely independent evaluations, and mechanisms for acting on recommendations Evaluation Conduct & Follow-up Comprehensiveness of evaluations Value for Money Effectiveness Evidence of management response and action to evaluation recommendations Risk Mitigation Efficiency Additionality Percentage of scheduled evaluations conducted Percentage of evaluation recommendations acted upon Quality of evaluations Time and effort required to conduct evaluations Integration of evaluations required by Global Fund with scheduled national M&E evaluations Degree of external review of evaluation conducts and quality Availability and scheduling of audit reviews of evaluations Organisational Management Availability of evaluation policies and procedures Sustainability Schedule of evaluation learning Capacity: Manage knowledge to make it accessible, so it can be used in the design and implementation of programs 14 Capacity Components Points to Consider Knowledge Capture & Organisation Use and level of integration of knowledge capture systems Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Effectiveness Efficiency Additionality Knowledge Sharing Internal and external dissemination and use of knowledge products Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Sustainability Value for Money Organisational Management Sustainability Efficiency Additionality Level of integration of Global Fund knowledge capture with national systems Number and distribution levels of knowledge products Level of internal and external availability and use of knowledge systems Number of staff, effort and costs per year required for knowledge sharing and systems Percentage of knowledge sharing activities funded through the grant Level of integration of Global Fund knowledge sharing with national systems Number of external audits and security reviews of knowledge sharing systems Availability of knowledge sharing policies and procedures Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support knowledge sharing Capacity: Program and grant-level plans and operations use national M&E guidelines and systems 15 Percentage of knowledge capture activities funded through the grant Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support knowledge capture Number of staff, effort and costs per year required for knowledge capture systems Availability of knowledge capture policies and procedures Effectiveness Risk Mitigation Level of organisation and structure of knowledge Number of external audits and security reviews of knowledge capture systems Timeliness of knowledge capture Capacity Components M&E Integration Points to Consider Number of M&E capture and dissemination systems Indicator Type Example Indicators Value for Money Integration with national M&E standards and systems Effectiveness Efficiency Additionality Number and level of integration of national M&E systems Time and effort of staff and costs to conduct M&E operations Level of integration of Global Fund M&E systems and requirements with national systems Risk Mitigation Organisational Management Responsibilities for M&E integration and coordination Partner working groups to coordinate M&E efforts Sustainability 16 Schedule of external reviews of overall M&E system integration Number of external resources or amount of salary supplements required to support national M&E integration