Revised Version Strategic Plan Document for Department of Food and Public Distribution, Government of India Smita Chugh and K.Raju Phase V Training LBSNAA Mussoorie 6th January, 2011 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1: Department of Food and Public Distribution: Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Chapter 2: Assessment of the Situation................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3: Outline of the Strategy ...........................................................................................14 Chapter 4: Implementation Plan ..............................................................................................17 chapter 5: Linkage between Strategic Plan and RFD………………………………………..37 Chapter 6: Cross departmental and cross functional issues……………………………..38 Annexure 1: ICT initiatives undertaken by different states ..........................................39 References ..................................................................................................................................... 422 2 Executive Summary Access to food continues to be a major issue for a substantial section of Indian population. Per capita cereal consumption of the Indian population has been declining in both rural and urban areas over the past two or three decades, as has annual per capita availability of foodgrains. While efforts to improve food security have gathered momentum with the proposed National Food Security Act, these can come to naught unless systems for procuring, storing and distributing foodgrains are not improved. Currently, food security is primarily ensured through the Public Distribution System (PDS) which targets around 400 million people and is budgeted at around for Rs.55,000 crore annually. However several studies including an evaluation by Planning Commission in 2004-05 reveal a number of problems in the implementation of the PDS. The scheme, the evaluation says, is affected by targeting errors (both inclusion and exclusion errors), spurious beneficiaries, diversion and pilferage and even location specific availability. Since Government of India is committed to bring out the National Food Security Act shortly, PDS becomes more important and critical for ensuring the ‘Right to Food’ being guaranteed to the people under the Act. This Strategic Plan document proposes a new vision and strategy for the PDS such that not only does every household in the country is enabled to access foodgrains in a manner that it is food secure at all times; but also that foodgrains entitled to it are delivered at the notified price, with utmost efficiency and in a most transparent manner. The plan proposes a five-fold strategy. As a first step, it proposes the setting up of a PDS Mission that takes the responsibility for bringing out policies in accordance with the Strategic Plan; for establishing systems and mechanisms for procuring, storing and delivering foodgrains to the targeted households; using consultative processes to help states prepare plans for reform and facilitating their implementation; and for monitoring performance. Second, the plan suggests a complete revamping of the procurement, storage and distribution system as existent under the present PDS. This can be done by encouraging decentralized procurement as far as possible; adopting a bottom-up planning approach for estimating demand and supply gaps; PPSs in select areas; and through improvement in the network and service delivery of fair price shops. Models to implement these innovations are presented. Third, to improve supply side management, an end-to-end ICT architecture is proposed, as are means to implement it. The fourth strategy focuses on strengthening transparency, accountability and grievance redressal mechanisms. Finally, the plan focuses on ways and means to promote community participation, which is presently very low/almost non-existent in the PDS. 3 Chapter 1: Department of Food and Public Distribution: Vision, Mission, Objectives and Functions 1.1 The Vision The Vision of the Department of Food and Public Distribution (DFPD), Government of India (GOI) is that every household in the country is enabled to become food secure at all times. 1.2 The Mission The foodgrains entitled to the households under PDS are delivered to every eligible household at the notified price, with utmost efficiency, in a most transparent manner 1.3 The Objectives The Department’s objectives are management of food economy of the country through efficient procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrains (cereals), ensuring availability of foodgrains, and securing access to the below poverty line (BPL) families families at affordable price. 1.4 The Functions The Department is mandated to perform wide rang of functions which include, Procurement of Foodgrains through Minimum Support Price (MSP) operations from across the country, Storage and transportation of foodgrains up to District point, allocation of foodgrains to the states based on poverty estimate of the state, fix prices for distribution of foodgrians to BPL and above poverty line (APL) families through FP shops and distribution of foodgrians to other food related schemes such as ICDS and Mid-day meals programs, The Strategic Plan document presented here covers only the Public Distribution System (PDS) as the Dept of Food and Public Distribution’s human resources and financial resources are primarily devoted to the Public Distribution System. The Department’s functions with regard to Sugar and Edible Oils are not covered in this Strategic Plan. Since Government of India is committed to bring out the National Food Security Act shortly, PDS becomes more important and critical for ensuring the ‘Right to Food’ being guaranteed to the people under the Act. 4 Chapter 2: Assessment of the Situation 2.1. The Republic of Hunger 2.1.1. Access to food continues to be a major issue for a substantial section of Indian population. Although there have been no widespread famines in India since Independence, the rates of chronic under-nutrition in the country, is amongst the highest in the world. 2.1.2. Almost one in two children are underweight or stunted and one-third of adults have a low BMI (body mass index) (NFHS-3). According to the ranking of the status of hunger of various countries using the Global Hunger Index (GHI) by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s score is 23.7, which gives it a rank of 66th out of 88 countries. According to the India Hunger Index report this score indicates continued poor performance at reducing hunger in India”. India ranks below several countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, such as Cameroon, Kenya, Nigeria, and Sudan; even though per capita income in these Sub-Saharan African countries is much lower than in India. 2.1.3. Some of the reasons for this grim picture in India are as follows: With a 500600 kcal deficit in energy intake (almost 40% of their requirement) and multiple nutrient deficiencies such as fat, calcium, iron, riboflavin, vitamin C (all 50% deficit) and vitamin A (70% deficit), it is not surprising that there is massive inadequacy/ hunger leading to malnutrition. 2.1.4. Diet surveys shows that over 70 to 80% of the calories consumed by the children (even though inadequate) are derived from cereals and pulses. However, per capita cereal consumption of the Indian population has been declining in both rural and urban areas over the past two or three decades. While overall expenditure on food too has declined, expenditure on cereals has witnessed a dramatic decline from 40.6 percent in rural areas in 1972-73 to 18 percent in 2004-05 and from 23.3 percent to 10.1 percent in urban areas respectively (see Table 2.1). The increase in the share of non-cereals has not been enough to compensate for the decline in cereal consumption. Overall, per capita intake of calories and protein has declined consistently over a 20year period from 1983 to 2004/5, according to NSS data. Rural calorie consumption per day has fallen from 2221 to 2047, an 8% decline. Similarly, the urban calorie consumption fell by 3.3%, from 2080 to 2020 (Source: Planning Commission). 5 Table 2.1: Composition of Food Consumption, All India, rural and urban 197273 to 2004-05 Source: Planning Commission 2.1.5. On the other hand, annual foodgrains availability per head of total population, has fallen steeply from 177 kg in the early 1990s, to only 153 kg by 2003-04, with over four-fifths of the fall coming after 1998 (see figure 2.1). This level prevailed 50 years ago, in the early 1950s, and is lower than the 157 kg average during 1937-41. This steep fall in foodgrains availability per head (Chart 1) is a highly abnormal trend, which is not expected when per capita income is rising (Patnaik 2007). The explanation, according to Patnaik (2007) can only lie in worsening income distribution of a particular type – an absolute decline in incomes and purchasing power for a major part of the population, outweighing rise for the minority with fast rising incomes. Therefore, access to foodgrains at affordable prices becomes not only a food security measure but also an important social security net to the poor in the country. 6 Figure 2.1: Annual per capita output and availability of foodgrains, triennial average ending in specified years Per Capita Output kg Per capita availability, kg Source: Patnaik, 2007 1991-92 178.8 177 1994-95 181.6 174.3 1997-98 176.8 174.2 2000-01 177.7 163.2 2002-03 164.1 153 2.1.6. Efforts to improve food security have recently gathered momentum with the National Advisory Council, under the leadership of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, undertaking the task of drafting a National Food Security Bill. If accepted as legislation, the National Food Security Act (NFSA) will go a long way in ensuring food security to all citizens of India. 2.2. Evolution of the Food Procurement Policy and Public Distribution System 2.2.1. As far as food procurement goes, until the mid 1990s cereal procurement was concentrated in a few northern States. However, under the Decentralized Procurement Scheme (DPS) introduced in 1997-98, the State Governments themselves undertake direct purchase of paddy and wheat and procurement of levy rice on behalf of the Government of India. In the event of the total quantity of wheat and rice thus procured falling short of the total allocation made by the Central Government, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) meets the deficit out of the Central Pool stocks. While the scheme has been very successful in increasing the procurement of cereals, particularly rice in many non-traditional states (see table 2.2), there is a need for states to increase procurement to reduce their requirement of food grains from the Central Pool. There is also a need for more states with large production, such as Bihar for wheat and rice and Assam for rice, to adopt the Decentralized Procurement Scheme. 7 Table 2.2: Procurement of Rice in DCP States during Kharif Marketing Season (figures in lakh tonnes) Source: Planning Commission 2.2.2. Yet another problem under decentralized procurement is the extent of food subsidy needed to meet state requirements. Under the scheme, state specific economic cost is determined by the Government of India and the difference between the economic cost so fixed and the central issue prices is passed on to the states as food subsidy. In addition, the Central Government also procures food grains for meeting the requirements of buffer stock. Hence, part of the food subsidy also goes towards meeting the carrying cost of buffer stock. The food subsidy bill of the Government of India peaked in 2004-05 to Rs. 25746 crores and declined as stocks declined. However, there is a danger of the subsidy bill rising due to increase in Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) and carrying costs of FCI. Food subsidies are likely to inflate further if the NFSA comes into place and estimated requirement for buffer stock increase1. It is estimated that with the NFSA in force, the subsidy involved would be in the order of Rs 75,000 crores. 2.2.3. Currently, food is distributed primarily through the Public Distribution System (PDS) and supplementary feeding programs such as ICDS and school mid-day meals. The major objectives of the PDS are: a) ensuring the entitlement of basic commodities at reasonable and affordable prices, especially to the poor; (b) maintaining stability in the prices of essential commodities across regions and in periods of price inflation; ((c) introducing rationing during scarcity; and (d) keeping a check on private trade, hoarding and black-marketing (Swaminathan, 2000). 2.2.4. PDS, as we know, is operated under the joint responsibility of the central and state governments, with the former responsible for procurement, storage, transportation (often upto the district headquarters) and bulk allocation of foodgrains. The state governments are responsible for distributing these foodgrains to consumers through a network of Fair Price Shops (FPS). This responsibility includes 1 A recent review of the existing buffer stocking policy in India suggests that by 2011-12, direct demand for human consumption is likely to be 89 million tonnes of rice and 65 million tonnes of wheat. An additional 4 million tonnes of rice and 13 million tonnes of wheat will be required to meet other demands, including industrial requirements. The report thus estimates that by 2011-12 India will require a minimum total buffer stock of 31 million tones, including 22 million tonnes of rice and 9 million tonnes of wheat. Of this, 16 million tonnes will be required for PDS, 6 million tonnes for welfare schemes and 9 million tonnes as food security reserve. 8 identification of families below poverty line (BPL), issue of BPL/ration cards, movement of foodgrains from the district headquarters to the FPSs, and supervision and monitoring of the functioning of the Fair Price Shops. 2.2.5. With a view to improving its efficiency, the PDS was re-designed as Targeted Public Distribution System (TDPS) with effect from June, 1997. The TPDS envisages identifying the poor households and giving them a fixed entitlement of foodgrains at subsidised prices. Under the TPDS, higher rates of subsidies are being given to the poor and the poorest among the poor. The families above the poverty line (APL) are also being given foodgrains under TPDS but with lower subsidy. There is a third category of beneficiaries –Antyodaya card holders. Under the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY), 35 kg of foodgrains are being provided to the poorest of the poor families at the highly subsidized rate of Rs.2 per kg. for wheat and Rs.3 per kg for rice. The effective functioning of PDS therefore has an important bearing on the quality of life of millions of people, particularly poor people in the country. It also has crucial implications for implementation of the NFSA. 2.2.6. However several studies including an evaluation by Planning Commission in 2004-05 reveal a number of problems in the implementation of the PDS which targets around 400 million people and is budgeted at around for Rs.55,000 crore annually. The scheme, the evaluation says, is affected by targeting errors (both inclusion and exclusion errors), spurious beneficiaries, diversion and pilferage and even location specific availability. The next section discusses in-depth, the problems with the PDS and why it is urgent that the system be corrected/ revamped if effective food security is to be ensured for all citizens of India and if gross wastage of taxpayers money is to be avoided. 2.3. Major Deficiencies in the Public Distribution System 2.3.1. In his address to the National Development Council in December 2007 Finance Minister Shri Chidambaram pointed out: “The next concern is the deeply flawed distribution system”. The most recent evaluation study on the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) by the Programme Evaluation Organization has found, inter alia, that taking into account all the inefficiencies of TPDS, Government of India spends Rs. 3.65 to transfer Re. 1 to the poor. About 58 per cent of subsidized grains do not reach the target group, of which a little over 36 per cent is siphoned off the supply chain.” 2.3.2. As identified by various studies, the major deficiencies of the PDS can be divided into problems faced on the ground in the actual nut and bolt delivery of the scheme i.e. the micro problems, and the more macro, design or policy issues. These are detailed below: 2.3a. Micro problems faced in delivery of scheme on the ground 2.3.3. High exclusion and inclusion errors: The Programme Evaluation Organisation’s (PEO) Study (2005) establishes large scale exclusion and inclusion errors in most states. High exclusion errors mean a low coverage of BPL households. The study estimates that TPDS covers only 57 per cent BPL families. Other estimates 9 put the figure at about one-third of poor households (NCAEPR). Inefficient targeting is because of two reasons. One is the criterion used for allocation of foodgrains by the Central Government to states. The Central Government allocates food grains to states based on a narrow official poverty line. There is a need to look at this allocation criterion to states. If we go by the official poverty ratio criterion, only about 28% of the population is eligible under PDS at all India level in 2004-05. However, various studies show that food insecure households may be higher than the official poverty ratios. A second problem is the use of BPL method for identifying households by the states. The procedure is usually opaque, bureaucratic, and does not involve gram sabhas. Also, the method of identification of beneficiaries differs from state to state. For example, some of the South Indian states do not follow the official poverty ratio for limiting the ration cards. This leads to high inclusion errors. 2.3.4. Leakages and Diversion: There is an urgent need to minimize leakages from the PDS, which are estimated to be very high. As per official estimates a total of 24 million tonnes of foodgrains was lifted by PDS in 2004-05, while NSSO’s consumption estimates indicate a total of 10.2 million tonnes, implying substantial leakages. Looking at the loss from a financial angle, during 2003-04, out of an estimated subsidy of Rs. 7,258 crore under TPDS, Rs. 4123 crore did not reach BPL families. Moreover, Rs. 2579 crore did not reach any consumer but was shared by agencies involved in the supply chain. 2.3.5. Leakages happen both on the APL and BPL allocation. It is estimated that only 20 percent of the APL households lift their ration quota and thus a part of the entitlement of these households leaks out of the PDS supply chain (NCAEPR). Other estimates suggest that not even half of the BPL quota reaches BPL families (PEO 2005). The intensity of leakage varies across states. For example, in Bihar and Punjab, the total leakage exceeds 75 per cent while in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh it is between 50 and 75 per cent (PEO 2005). Ten to thirty percent of leakages take place through ghost cards i.e. diversion of subsidised food grains to ineligible users. This implies that food grains often find their way to the open market and there is huge exclusion of deserving beneficiaries. Further, the cost of delivery increases. The PEO study mentioned above estimated that for every 1 kg. that was delivered to the poor, Government of India had to issue 2.32 kg from the Central Pool. 2.3.6. Problems with storage: FCI's covered storage capacity has remained stagnant since March 2005, but there have been many incentives to attract private investors of godowns. Also, FCI stores grain mainly in jute sacks; but this causes problems as the gunny sacks are easily damaged by rodents. Pilferage too is made easier with gunny bags. One can always say rats ate up the grain or fungus destroyed it. Problems in storage continue at the block level wherein foodgrain storage points are usually without electricity, computer systems or even landline phones. Records are kept manually. Despite the high monetary value of the foodgrains stored, there is usually only a single attendant and no security personnel. Further, these warehouses are not equipped to weigh the food grain received from the FCI as they have weighing scales of only 0.3 MT capacity. FPS owners thus complain of under weighing of foodgrains made available to their shop by about 2-3 Kgs in each bag of 50 Kgs. 2.3.7. Problems with transportation: The transportation of stocks from FCI / Rice Mills to Block Level Storage Points is called as Stage–I transportation, which is 10 usually undertaken through the district-wise private transport contractors through tenders, and is an important source of pilferage and recycling. However, the bulk of the pilferage happens under Stage II transportation i.e. from block level storage point to the doorstep of the FPS. To illustrate, PDS rice is often smuggled to rice mills and converted to cattle feed by grinding and mixing it with paddy husk; this is then sold in the market at thrice the price. In other cases it is polished in rice mills; later these are sold in the open market for four times the price, with the scam running into crores of rupees. 2.3.8. Poor access to Fair Price Shops: Fair Price Shops represent the face of the government as ration card holders transact business with FPSs once or more than once every month. But for various reasons, these shops remain inaccessible to households, more so to poor households. For one, villagers and urban residents often have to fetch rations from distances beyond six kilometers. With the shop opening just two to three days in a month, this proves to be very difficult. Two, rations not claimed by households during a month are declared lapsed. Since poor households do not have cash to buy 35 kg at a time, and they are not permitted to buy in installments, they lose out on their quota. Three, there are persistent complaints about the quantity and quality of foodgrains delivered at these shops. Irregular delivery of FPS quota is a persistent problem as is cheating while weighing foodgrains for the consumer. Four, independent field studies reveal that prices charged at these shops normally exceed the official rates by about 10-14 percent. Five, there is considerable exclusion of Dalits, migrants and the homeless. Shah et al (2006) estimate that only 17 percent of villages have FPS shops in dalit hamlets. Nearly 70 percent of the outlets are located in dominant caste localities where FPS dealers, more often than not, discriminate against dalits in issuance of grains. Seasonal and temporary migrants on the other hand face problems in receiving their entitlements during the period they are out from the village. Therefore they often pawn their cards to money lenders who misuse them. The plight of the homeless and poor living in unauthorised colonies in urban areas is worse. They are denied ration cards, and are thus not able to avail of PDS, despite being Indian citizens. 2.3.9. Poor financial viability of Fair Price Shops: As per the PEO study, only 22.7% of the FPSs were found to be earning a viable return of 12% ROI on working capital. The financial viability of these shops appears to have been badly affected by the exclusion of APL population from the PDS (which happened after PDS became TPDS in 1997). The virtual exclusion of the APL population has led to a big decline in off take. With fewer ration cards to serve, lower turnover and upper bounds on the margins that can be charged to BPL consumers, the net profits of fair price shop owners and dealers are lower under the TPDS than before. Since there are economies of scale, for instance, with respect to transport, the distribution of smaller quantities is likely to make many shops unviable. It is not surprising that transport and rental costs constitute, on average, more than 40 percent of the operational costs of FPSs. Yet another condition that mars the financial viability of FPS owners is that they are required to lift their monthly quota on down payment (through DDs). When fair price shops are economically viable, there are fewer incentives to cheat. In fact, the Planning Commission study suggests that most of the vast network of retail outlets maintained by the states to sell subsidised food would be unprofitable without the diversion of grains (Planning Commission 2005). 11 2.3.10. Lack of transparency, inadequate accountability of officials implementing the scheme and poor grievance redressal: Most fair price shops do not display relevant prices on their Notice Boards as it saves them accountability. The selection procedure of FPS dealers is also marred with problems, and is often based on patronage or bribes. 2.3b. The more macro, policy issues 2.3.11. Failure to meet the Regional Allocation and Price Stabilization Objective: Only a few states produce foodgrains and therefore distribution of foodgrains cannot be left to market forces. The PDS therefore was designed as a tool by way of which the government could ensure price stabilisation in the country by transferring grain from cereal-surplus to cereal-deficit regions. Targeted PDS has reduced the effectiveness of this objective. This is because under TPDS, the demand for cereals is no longer determined by State Governments (based on their requirements, and in practical terms on past utilisation) but on allocations decided by the Central Government (based on poverty estimates prepared by the Planning Commission). Further, allocations from GoI are valid only for a month, and if the state government is not able to lift within that time, its quota lapses. Some poor states like Bihar and Orissa are not able to lift their entire quota. This has implications later too as they are not released their allocations on the ground that they did not lift the foodgrains in the past when the market price was low. 2.3.12. Interest burden for states: States need to borrow from commercial banks to finance their PDS operations and to ensure that the capital is kept rolling for the shortest period. Interest cost burden of state civil supplies corporations is based on a concessional rate of interest granted under the “food credit” from the banking system by hypothecating the grain stock and the state government providing a guarantee. In addition state corporations need to pay 1% market fee in respect of the allotment and 4% VAT on the economic cost of FCI. This places a significant interest burden on states with State Food Corporations running into huge losses. 2.3.13. Multiplicity of agencies: Finally, there are a multiplicity of agencies involved in food distribution starting from FCI, to the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC), State Civil Supplies Corporations, transport contractors and FP shop dealers to deliver nearly 55 to 60 Million tonnes of food grains through more than 6 lakh FP shops at the end point. All in all, the department itself has six wings and 3 PSUs under it. Moreover, several acts such as the Food Corporations Act and the Warehousing Corporations Act govern the chain of procurement, storage and distribution. The current organizational structure of the Department of Food and Public Distribution therefore is not amenable for pushing the reform agenda. 2.4: Strengths, Opportunities, Threats: In the foregoing analysis of the situation faced highlighting the weaknesses in the present system we could take into account the following strengths and opportunities while factoring in the threats outlined below while drawing up our strategy. 12 2.4a : Strengths We draw upon the existing infrastructure and institutional framework. We could expand on the best practices successfully implemented in certain States. 2.4b : Opportunities We are poised in a scenario where we could draw upon the prevailing technologies for ICT as well as the existing structure of people’s involvement. 2.4c : Threats We have to factor in the shortfall of supplies due to failure of monsoon and declining productivity due to adoption of unsustainable agricultural practices. International market fluctuations could further jeopardize our efforts to ensure availability of supplies. 13 Chapter 3: Outline of the Strategy Long term goals, policy solutions and key strategies Goal 1. Restructuring and Strengthening the Department of Food and Public Distribution Policy Solutions/Key Strategies - - The Department of Food and Public Distribution establishes a PDS Mission The PDS Mission takes responsibilities to bring out policies in accordance with the Strategic plan, establishes systems and mechanisms for delivering foodgrains to the targeted households without any leakages Mission uses consultative processes to help states prepare plans for reform and facilitates their implementation by the states Mission monitors performance of states and Centre as agreed in the MOUs Result Indicators - Vision document outlining the structure, powers and responsibilities of the Mission prepared Consultative workshops held with all states towards preparation of plans MOUs signed with all states outlining clearly the responsibilities of both states and the central government Improvement in performance indicators year-on-year, as tracked by an independent third party Goal 2. Revamping the Procurement, Storage and Distribution System Policy Solutions/Key Strategies - Decentralized planning and procurement PPPs for procrurement, storage and distribution in select, notified areas Improved network and service delivery of Fair Price Shops Result Indicators - Policy for proactively promoting decentralized procurement notified Policy for promoting Public-Private- Partnership in procurement, storage and transportation up to FP Shop in select areas notified MOUs signed with all states outlining clearly the responsibilities of both states and the central government MOUs signed with the private agencies in select areas for procurement, storage and transportation up to FP Shop Improvement in performance indicators year-on-year, as tracked by an independent third party 14 Goal 3. Developing an end-to-end ICT architecture for PDS management Policy Solutions/Key Strategies - - An integrated ICT architecture tracking procurement; storage and inventory management; allocation; transportation; FPS functioning; licensing; beneficiary management; and monitoring across the country Leveraging existing learning and resources for optimal solutions Result Indicators - Blue-print for end to end ICT architecture prepared and Request for Proposal (RFP) issued Hardware and software deployed for managing all the transactions on-line. All transactions happen online and data that is captured from the transactions is uploaded to the National Portal for building data base Various MIS reports are generated from the National Portal Improvement in performance indicators year-on-year, as tracked by an independent third party Goal 4. Strengthening monitoring and reviewing arrangements and improving transparency, accountability and grievance redressal mechanisms Policy Solutions/Key Strategies - - All the decisions in the management of PDS are taken in a transparent manner and the entire information is available in public domain Every functionary responsible for the implementation of PDS is held accountable to certain defined tasks and action taken in case of failure to perform the tasks assigned Very strong and robust grievance reddressal mechanisms are put in place Result Indicators - - The information about all the transactions in procurement, storage, transportation and distribution is placed in public domain by capturing the data into the National Portal Complaints relating to dereliction of duties of the functionaries concerned are acted upon and responsible punished without delay Grievance redressal mechanisms in the shape of National/State/District level Food Security Missions are established Individual or community level grievances are acted upon expeditiously by the institutions set up as part of grievance reddressal mechanism Goal 5. Promoting Community Participation Policy Solutions/Key Strategies - Involving communities in village level demand estimation 15 - Involving communities in closely monitoring the functioning of FP shop Management of Fair Price Shops by Communities and Women Periodic conduct of social auditing of PDS by the Gram Sabhas Empowered role of Gram Sabhas and Gram Panchayats Result Indicators - Village level PDS Plans are prepared covering details such as the foodgrains to be locally procured and foodgrains needed under PDS FP shop level monitoring committee established Gram sabhas are facilitated to conduct Social auditing of PDS periodically Prioritization of Goals Using three parameters - suitability (effectiveness and impact), feasibility (ease of implementation) and acceptability (by stakeholders) – the different goals/strategic initiatives can be assigned weights as follows Goals/Strategic Initiatives Goal. Restructuring and Strengthening dept, establishing PDS mission Goal 2. Revamping procurement, storage and distribution Goal 3. Developing an end-to-end- ICT architecture Goal 4: Strengthening monitoring, review, transparency, accountability and grievance redressal mechanisms Goal 5. Promoting community participation Total Weights 25 25 20 20 10 100 16 Chapter 4: Implementation Plan 4.1. Goal 1: Restructuring and Strengthening the Department of Food and Public Distribution in mission mode 4.1.1. PDS is the joint responsibility of the Centre and State. There are various stakeholders, each with their own interests and capacities. To coordinate these diverse interests and capacities like FCI, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, State Agencies, NIC etc., a separate empowered organizational structure is required to tackle the gigantic task of strengthening the PDS. 4.1.2. It is of relevance to note here that reform initiatives are not new to the PDS system. There have been and are several attempts to do so, but what has been lacking is a mission mode approach. Also of note is the lack of a strong neutral institutional home with proven capacity to manage procurement and delivery of foodgrains. 4.1.3. We suggest establishment of a Mission within the Dept of Food and PDS to manage PDS professionally. The following is the suggested step-by-step implementation plan to do so: - - - - In order to arrive at a strategic policy that can be implemented across States, it is proposed that a Mission Director be appointed at the Centre under the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution at the level of an Addl. Secretary to Govt of India, who will be assisted by three Task Forces on Policy, Finance and Accounts and ICT architecture. The members of these Task Forces will be drawn from relevant fields of expertise. The mission director will also coordinate between the various task forces where necessary. It is proposed that the mission have six wings including a) procurement, storage, transportation; b) PDS outlets; c) ePDS; d) Capacity building; e) Financial management; and f) Monitoring and evaluation. As a first step, a vision document will be prepared that outlines the structure, powers and responsibilities of the Mission clearly As a next step, the task forces will provide specific policy inputs on various aspects of implementation strategies, address policy gaps and prepare road map for implementation in consultation with stakeholders in a manner that the overall reforms in PDS are carried out within one year at the level of states after the enabling policies/facilitating environment is created at the Centre. For instance, a Procurement and Distribution plan, for each procurement year, will be prepared at least 3 months in advance. Since procurement year commences on Oct 1st of every year, the Mission will hold meetings with the Civil Supplies Depts of each state, review the PDS functioning, assess the likely procurement to be undertaken by FCI/on behalf of FCI, the decentralized procurement the state wants to do and arrive at the foodgrains to be delivered to the state to realize the rights guaranteed under the NFSA to prioritized/general groups as well as other welfare schemes. The Mission will accordingly prepare a detailed implementation/action plan as per the Procurement and Distribution plan developed. This will also elaborate the role 17 - - - - to be played by other wings other than procurement (e.g. ePDS) for effective procurement and distribution. Similarly, the task force on ICT architecture will be responsible for design, operations, maintenance, and ongoing updation of ICT architecture in PDS/support to stakeholders. The consultative processes and planning are expected to culminate in MOUs between the centre and the state. In the MOU, a particular state may commit certain targets under decentralized procurement, creation of storage space, and time bound implementation of PDS reforms. On the other hand, the central government may commit towards provision of foodgrains and finances and that it will provide state governments, adequate credit at suitable interest rates to manage their PDS operations. In addition, the MOUs will give details on the performance and evaluation indicators; mechanisms for monitoring them; and penalties if such indicators are not met. Specifically, they will include a responsibility matrix that will give clear measurable objectives at every stage of the process required to achieve the plan and the stakeholders involved. While such consultative planning has been attempted before, the difference would lie in the facilitation that the Mission will provide to the state governments to fulfill their obligations set out in the MOU. For example, as a part of PDS reforms, end-to-end ICT architecture is to be implemented. The Mission would actually provide supportive guidance to the state governments to fulfill this obligation. Similarly as a part of reform agenda, if PPP is to be introduced for procurement and storage in certain difficult areas, the Mission will support the State Government by giving guidelines on PPP. The capacity building wing of the Mission will provide support to poorer states on development of plans and also in assisting the states to promote community participation and social auditing of PDS through appropriate institutional and human capacity building strategies. The following organizational structure is envisaged in this regard: 18 Mission Director Task Force on Policy(6 months) Policy on easy disbursal to states on transparent norms Policy on access to credit to states on low interest rates Policy changes for procurement including specifications, standards and norms MSP/Commissions Finalise modes of creating a unified national database of beneficiaries Identify role of centre and states in implementation Suggest PPP partnerships for various segments of the policy Identify criteria for PPP Task Force on Finance & Accounts (3 months) Policy architecture on implementation of direct transfer of funds for MSP/Commissions; Methodologies for payment to other institutions like Railways, transport agencies, owners of FPS etc Identification of all processes in regard to the above Coordination with Banks and Financial Institutions with regard to payment interface Task Force on ICT Architecture (one year) Study of the existing systems both at FCI and in various States like Tamil Nadu, Chattisgarh, Haryana, AP . Recommending ICT solutions to capture beneficiary database and eliminate bogus/duplicate cards Recommending ICT Architecture for the new policy and modules for procurement, allocation and distribution that could be customized as per state needs in consonance with CSC & other IT policy of GOI Recommending clear guidelines for connectivity to remote areas Recommend overall ICT infrastructure for the Centre and the States Provide estimates for implementation 19 4.2. Goal 2: Revamping the Procurement, Storage and Distribution System 4.2.a. Decentralized planning and procurement 4.2.1.Wherever possible, PDS grain should be procured within the state where it is distributed. The Central Government should ensure that adequate incentives are in place for this purpose. In the long run, efforts should be made to procure, store and distribute foodgrain in a manner as to minimize transportation costs and losses. The government should open procurement centres within a radius of 10 kms wherever feasible and provide on spot payment by cheques to farmers. This will minimize intermediaries and lead to cash transfer into rural economy and boost food grain production. 4.2.2.The first step to effective decentralized procurement is a bottom-up planning process at the district, division, region, state and national levels. This paper suggests that food security needs, demand-supply gaps and thus procurement needs be drawn up first at the Gram Panchayat level and these be aggregated upwards at the block, district, state, regional and finally the national level with suitable templates. Table 4.1 provides one such template to develop an estimation of produce that is available for procurement for PDS and other food nutrition related programme. The items in italics can be integrated into an expanded food basket in phased manner. Milk, fruits, eggs could be considered for MDM and ICDS wherever feasible for supplementary nutrition. 4.2.3.Table 4.1 would give information on planning of logistics with certain key principles: Maximum procurement and consumption at local level Estimation of demand and supply gap of food commodities Minimum transportation distance (eg. each district /division /region to try and meet demand from nearest surplus location wherever feasible) Preference for local varieties as per dietary habits 4.2.4.Such database is a must irrespective of whether it is the State or private agencies that are engaged in procurement, storage and distribution. This is important both from the viewpoint of food security as well as to bring in efficiencies in operations by reducing costs, estimation of demand and supply gaps (both deficit and surplus areas) and planning for storage infrastructure and transportation. Such information will also help stabilize prices and check inflationary pressures and market aberrations. 20 Table 4.1: Food Grid at GP level for food security plan (Bottom Up Approach) Name of Village--- Food baskets / Local Production A. Total Production B. Self Consumption at household level (household, seeds, cattlefeed etc) C. Total Available Marketable Surplus (A-B) D. Total Requirement for PDS,MDM & ICDS E. Requirement Deficit (D-C) Name of Block------ Wheat Paddy Coarse Millets (subcolumns for types .e.g jowar, soyabean, sorghum etc) Distict------------ Pulses Edible Milk Eggs Fruits Oil etc 4.2.b. PPPs for Procurement, Storage and Distribution in select areas 4.2.4. Effective management of foodgrains, which is a pre-requisite for a wellgoverned PDS, has been beset with problems and weaknesses in the supply chain. First, intermediaries enjoy a big "take-out" in the form of margins and commissions, which ideally should benefit the farmers, which in turn will result in increased production. Second, a significant proportion of grains are wasted due to bad or improper handling and storage, pest infestation, loss of quality owing to moisture, poor logistics, and inadequate storage and transportation infrastructure. Third, postharvest losses amount to as much as 30 per cent in India. Fourth, lack of access to quality information and inputs too hamper production. Many of these deficiencies pointed out above, even if reduced marginally, are bound to result in greater income level to farmers, better governance of PDS and higher food security in the country. 4.2.6. Decentralized procurement can help reduce to a significant extent the gaps between demand and supply. Community grain banks and fair price shops run by communities or self-help groups of women can also help reduce leakages in storage and distribution. However, where the ratio between agricultural production and procurement needs is on the lower side, such areas may be notified and private partnership encouraged along with state led interventions. These can help enhance efficiency and accountability in procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrains upto the last mile delivery at Fair Price Shops or what can be called as F2F – Field to Fair Price Shops. 4.2.7. The model followed can either be open-ended wherein the same agency services all aspects of the value chain or wherein different players/vendors service each component separately. While delivery upto FPS is envisaged, household delivery 21 is also feasible, as is being done in 2000 villages of Maharashtra. Area specific approach is preferred. It is also envisaged that private players can provide agriextension services while accessing institutional knowledge and support available with the governments. Procurement 4.2.7. Presently, the objectives of procurement by the Government are: To ensure that farmers get remunerative prices for their produce and do not have to resort to distress sale. To service the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) and other welfare schemes of the Government so that subsidised foodgrains are supplied to the poor and needy. To build up buffer stocks of foodgrains to ensure foodgrain security. To achieve the above, the central government extends price support to paddy, coarse grains and wheat through the FCI and State Agencies. All the foodgrains conforming to the prescribed specifications are offered for sale at specified centers and are bought by the public procurement agencies at the Minimum Support Price (MSP). The producers have the option to sell their produce to FCI/State Agencies at MSP or in the open market as is advantageous to them. Foodgrains procured by the State Governments and their agencies are ultimately taken over by the FCI for distribution through out the country. 4.2.8. Under the PPP model, it is envisaged that private players will set up procurement centres within 8-10 kms radius (norms to be fixed as per crop intensity) and will ensure instant payment by cheque/ bank transfer (MSP guaranteed). The requirement for stock will be estimated based on demand and supply gaps identified by the bottom up approach as described above. Ideally, the outcomes expected from the player are: To open procurement centres in near vicinity (as per area) Give information to farmers on availability of fertilizers and other inputs Advise farmers on best yield and best farming practices – this can be done through local village camps or over local cable channels or through mobile. Provide farmers with access to soil testings and other related information including weather, plant diseases, pests, etc. This can be done over SMS to registered farmers. Procure directly from farmers using electronic weighing scales Assist farmers pre-harvest and ensure quality of foodgrains post-harvest at the time of procurement Make instant payment to producers Feed operational information into centralized software/update MIS Ensure transparency of operations and availability of information to public at all times. 22 Storage 4.2.9. In India, about 70% of farm produce is stored by farmers for their own consumption. Farmers store grain in bulk, using different types of storage structures made from locally available materials. The pre-treatment necessary for better storage life is cleaning and drying of the grain, but storage structure design and its construction also play a vital role in reducing or increasing the losses during storage. Storage losses constitute a major share of food grain loss in postproduction operations. Various home-grown models are already available both for storage and for drying foodgrains for quality control. However farmers either lack the money to make the requisite investment or lack awareness about such models. Lack of initiatives on the part of small and medium farmers to increase their local storage capacity results in over dependence on FCI. Currently, the state-run Food Corporation of India (FCI) and the Central Warehousing Corp (CWC) have together a capacity to store 87 million tonnes of grain. The CWC has 487 warehouses with a capacity of 10.6 million, while the FCI, with 1,500 godowns, accounts for the rest. 4.2.10. Setting up a community drying-cum-storage complex has great potential as it will help to reduce losses and will help provide a better return for the grower. Private players can facilitate this by building storage capacity at block level with a minimum of 3 months buffer. To do so, they may be given the option of building their own or using available infrastructure to be upgraded by them later (terms and conditions dependent on business viability, terrain, distance from procurement centre to storage point, land /construction costs, nature of commodity etc). The government on its part can provide incentives to private players to develop such scientific storage infrastructure on BOOT basis. Storage requirements can be estimated by obtaining real time estimates of the production capacity of beneficiaries. In addition, the private sector can help development of grain hubs at every 100-200 kms and exchange information between the hubs, which can eventually transform into a national 'Agrigrid'. To implement all these measures, Service Level Agreements (SLAs) can be entered with vendors to minimize storage loss. SLAs would cover areas such as following of scientific practice in storage, inventory management, maintaining real time data base on a central server etc. 4.2.11. For easy movement of foodgrain, state governments may identify sites for regional hubs (Eastern, western, Northern Sothern, Central and NE ) where bulk storage for intra and inter state movement of foodgrain can be done. 23 Distribution 4.2.12. Private players can be used to move foodgrains from storage godowns to FPS outlet/ beneficiary household as per demand and stock position as reflected in the MIS. They can also help facilitate establishment of ICT system as per standards prescribed and can help lay IT connectivity in remote areas of a State. Yet another area where the private sector may serve as a service partner can be in maintenance of handheld devices and readers at FPS outlets. 4.2.13. Railways could be a major public partner in the exercise of transporting foodgrains between States and districts and ultramodern storages could be identified or built around such rail hubs. The private sector can also give a lending hand in this initiative through the 'own your wagon' model with Railways. This way, actual logistics can be networked and foodgrains moved between various bulk storage areas through an ICT based system. Who should be the partners? 4.2.14. Given the fact that most farmers or producers expect timely payment, accessibility to procurement centres and farm gate pickup, care should be exercised during the selection of private partners. They – a. b. Should NOT be a trading Company Should NOT have substantial private individual owned ownership structure; preferably should be institutionally owned with substantial public sector equity c. Should have performed similar services for at least 3 years; so that one avoids fly by night operators d. Should have substantial net worth – suggested net worth of at least Rs. 50 crore 24 e. f. g. h. Should have a pan India presence including in remote rural areas. Should have had past experience of procuring directly from farmers. Should have reputation, credibility and integrity in the market. Selection should NOT be based on “least cost”/tender. Agencies who fulfill criteria should be empanelled as approved procurement agencies who can be awarded procurement for identified areas based on pre-defined fixed incidentals which are 5-10% less than that provided to government agencies. i. Agencies should be provided medium term contracts for 3 years or more, so that they can set up the required infrastructure and manpower without fear that the Government will terminate the contracts after one season 4.2.c. Improving the network and service delivery of Fair Price Shops 4.2.15. Fair Price Shops represent the final face of the government in the food distribution chain with the ration card holders transacting with FP shop once or more than once every month. It is therefore critical that their network and delivery systems be improved and their services be of the highest quality. The following steps can be taken as a part of the reform agenda of FPS outlets: All entitlements under the PDS should be made accessible by the entitlementholder anywhere in the country, at a shop of their choice, irrespective of their place of origin. There must be one shop every two km or a strict adherence to the current GOI norm of 1 shop for every 2000 persons with a priority to open new FPS in dalit hamlets In remote villages (especially tribal areas) mobile vans need to be deployed The Fair Price Shops must be mandatorily open six days a week In rural areas, full monthly quota of foodgrains for distribution must reach the retail outlets within the first seven days of the month. In urban areas, where FPS may have lesser storage space, the quota can be delivered in 2-3 installments Each FPS must be provided at all times with 5% additional stock based on an end-to-end integrated computerised inventory management All states must ensure doorstep delivery including loading/unloading to FPS in the presense of PRI members. Beneficiaries should be allowed to accumulate unclaimed rations from FPSs for at least one year. To make Fair Price Shops financially viable, FPS level margins need to be uniformly fixed at a given proportion of economic cost. Also, all states must as far as possible build new FPSs in community/ public buildings or make specific provisions for rental expenditure. They must also provide interest free loans and seed capital for new FPSs. Yet another idea to increase financial viability of FPSs is to allow them to sell grocery items in addition to PDS items. 25 4.3. Goal 3: Developing an end to end ICT architecture for PDS management 4.3.1. The case for using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to enhance productivity and capacity in almost all areas of governance is fairly well established. Since the PDS system is a classic example of a complex supply chain management issue, the need for ICT is further established, as ICT has shown vast improvements in supply chain management in similar processes, both in the private sector as well as other public domain processes. 4.3.2. Given below is a table which lists out the key challenges in PDS and recommends possible ICT interventions that can positively impact on the functioning of the system as well as improve the processes within the PDS. It also lists the current initiatives undertaken by several states to strengthen PDS. All of these show that: (a) states are keen to improve and strengthen PDS; (b) ICT has a definite role to play and can improve PDS. Key Process Procurement Challenge Scale Coordination Information Availability Storage & Inventory Multiple Parties ICT Intervention An integrated ICT architecture for tracking procurement across the country. A core banking payment system to ensure payments to farmers and millers Integrated ICT architecture ensuring data that is available to all stakeholders regarding current procurement levels and requirements. Networked system to ensure there is coordination between FCI, State agencies and other bodies involved in procurement. Above infrastructure will ensure that information is available for decision making at all levels through a centralized MIS. The MIS will provide information on Procurement sources and their capacity Procurement sources master data along with bank account information Integrated demand, offtake and procurement capacity information to match demand with procurement planning. RFID/barcode tagged bags with 26 Management Storage Losses Inventory management Allocation Transportation & clear directions on stock management as per specific stock item. Integrated ICT architecture to ensure that all parties have adequate information and plan for storage, link stock availability with distribution, requisition and allocation. Tagged bags to follow FIFO method to improve inventory maintenance. Automatic weighing machines linked to integrated ICT architecture and POS systems to track stock levels across the supply chain Implementation of FIFO through ICT system to avoid long storage periods. RFID/barcode tagged bags to be tracked through the supply chain to prevent leakage or diversion. Integrated ICT architecture to link information from inventory, distribution and smartcards modules to automate allocation alerts. As above. Linking allocation to consumption and stock levels. Reducing allocation cycle time. Information Consolidation Transportation Loss Electronic Weigh Bridges to be installed at all loading points, where possible with computer generated truck chits/movement challans and weight check memos GPS tracking of trucks to ensure non-diversion of commodities. Web-enabled tightly monitored route charts to track the movement from the warehouses to the FPS with details of commodities carried and identity/contact of the truck driver/attendant. SMS alerts to be sent to citizens on truck movements Lack of Information Data from above to be integrated into ICT system to pull out information as and when required. Timely Delivery GPS tracking linked to webenabled information systems; 27 FPS Functioning Allocations Finance Operations Licensing Management of FPSs Beneficiary Management Identification timely information will lead to timely delivery. Allocation to the FPS shall be done online on basis of card holders and its stock position Core banking linked payment facility to FPS owners. Integrated software that links payment to requisition and allocation information coupled with SMS alerts to FPS owners, allocation authorities and godowns. Automatic credit rating of FPS owners on predesigned operational parameters. Online requisition from FPS and transparent allotment. SMS alerts to FPS owners on stock receipt at state godowns. Robust POS terminals to send time of opening of shops to central server. Each FPS to be provided with an automatic weighing machine connected to a POS biometric reader+billing machine (both with voice-enabled features in the local language) to ensure compatibility between the quantity provided and recorded Automated inventory balance and stock balance. All transactions at FPS to be stored on FPS owner’s smart card. Smart card based licenses to store information of FPS. Digitization of ration cards and common database of beneficiaries linked to smart card information and biometrics. Convergence of biometrics and beneficiary database with UID database to filter bogus and duplicate beneficiaries. Possible portability of smart card across FPS once UID based identification is in place. Online application and issue of ration cards. 28 Off-take recording Monitoring Grievance Mechanism POS machines at FPS (voice enabled) to automatically input data into beneficiary smart card as well as FPS smart card. Smartcards as records of off-take, Integrated ICT architecture to upload all off take into a central server for online consolidation and availability of data to decision makers. All POS machines to have long battery life given harsh conditions in FPS Online/telephonic grievance redressal mechanism that provides acknowledgment Deployment of solution through CSCs, call centres and SMS Central call centre linked to integrated ICT architecture so that caller can get immediate information regarding grievance Common web-enabled MIS Portal that provides drill down information and reports on key performance parameters, accessible to public at large. An indicative list of MIS reports can include: procurement centre wise foodgrains procured, storage godown wise foodgrains stored, foodgrains transported to FP shops, household wise foodgrains distributed at FP shop level. Current Initiatives Item States Computerization of TPDS operations FCI Pilot in 3 Districts each of Andhra to Block level Godowns. Pradesh, Assam, Chattisgarh & Delhi. Computerization of ration card related 10 states have reported taking up data database. digitization Smart card based delivery to ration card Pilot project in Haryana and Chandigarh holders GPS based tracking vehicles transporting Tamil Nadu, Delhi, and Chattisgarh. TPDS commodities 4.3.3. The Food Corporation of India has partially implemented an Integrated Information System for Foodgrains Management (IISFM). Apart from this there is partial computerization of varying degrees of various parts of the TPDS cycle in almost all the states. 29 Annexure 1 discusses different initiatives taken by various State Governments in strengthening PDS through ICT intervention. These initiatives indicate the relevance and need for technology in PDS delivery, but also demonstrate a disaggregate approach to use of technology and resultant sub-optimal approach to performance management. 4.3.4. Core principles of ICT application: The Wadhwa Committee Report had made various recommendations regarding strengthening of PDS. The Central government (including FCI) as well as various State Governments have taken various measures to revitalize PDS and remove its ills. Many of these measures involve ICT as both a strengthening mechanism as well as a tool for taking corrective action. However, when undertaking an egovernance initiative of this magnitude, it is imperative to keep in mind certain core principles of ICT application in order to ensure appropriate results. It is felt that these core principles are worth reiterating in the present context. (a) End-to-End transaction-based solution framework: ICT solutions must be endto-end solutions in order to be effective. This means not only that the solution encompasses the whole cycle – from procurement to delivery to beneficiary, but also that it is uniform, in terms of software architecture for core processes / information across states. The solution also needs to be transaction based in the sense that it must involve no or extremely limited opportunity for off line transaction entry. The software therefore needs to provide for a single time entry of transactions at its origin to ensure that data entry is not duplicated and data integrity is protected across processes and actors. Such an end-to-end system enables: A full audit trail, which makes it easier to pinpoint weaknesses in the system, since all the parts are connected to the whole. A delivery from a taluka godown needs to reach the FPS. A cross check between the godown and the FPS requires an integrated system where both the FPS and the godown data is on the same application. Meaningful and effective MIS as an integrated transaction based solution allows for minimal manual intervention, thus providing for integrity of data as well as completeness of data Minimal transaction costs for procuring and managing software solutions. Further such a system also enables states with capacity constraints to benefit from a common platform for program and performance management. Importantly, a common solution framework coupled with common technology standards for key components (such as POS, smartcards, biometrics, data interchange standards etc. many of which are now possible in the country) can help in interoperability across states and provide portability of services for the beneficiary, during migration or other circumstances. 30 (b) Deployment of key technologies that enable last mile service delivery: Specific advances and developments in technology and their deployment across the world and our country (as evidenced by current initiatives) provide examples of technology that enable strengthening last mile service delivery as well as monitoring of the same. These include – Multi-purpose Smartcard Technology – which serves as a tool for identification of beneficiaries through photos and storage of biometric data (as well as PIN options). Smart cards serve as record keeping devices that can store details of transactions related to the beneficiary for cross validation. Further they provide a mechanism for offline service delivery (in the event of connectivity constraints). Smartcards also have the capacity to serve multiple applications across different sectors. Very importantly, smartcards can be a means to protect privacy of information pertaining to the beneficiary, if so desired. However, multiple proliferation of the cards for different services of the government mitigate against efficiency apart from inconveniencing the citizen. There is also scope to review the utility of such cards, given the growing connectivity capacity in the country and juxtaposing their relevance with disaster situations and privacy concerns. Biometric technology – that facilitates verification and authentication of beneficiaries. This in turn helps in ensuring that the benefits reach the right person and also helps (through authentication systems) linked to a common database to continually track and eliminate duplicate beneficiary records Point of Sale Equipment – The Point of Sale equipment proposed for the Pilot could be a Hand Held Recorder or a mobile device with biometric attachments, printers and connectivity devices. Technological advances have made availability of such devices that are handy, portable, and can store large amount of data and at the same time provide cost effective options. The easy availability of such devices coupled with mobile connectivity options help extending the reach of technology and alternate service delivery systems. Other technology applications – such as GPS, mobile technologies, barcoding and RFID are all under proven use, especially in the private sector across the globe and form an integral part of supply chain management. (c) Making the architecture beneficiary centric: Time and again we need to remind ourselves that ultimately the purpose of reform is to reach the right amount of foodgrans, at the right time, to the right person. The idea of a beneficiary centric solution implies that the performance parameters and outputs expected of the ICT initiatives result in measurable improvement, not only in the process where they are applied, but also in the ultimate goal of providing benefit to the ultimate user of the system - the BPL family. Efforts to improve procurement, storage, transportation, licensing and finance, are ultimately meaningless if they do not result in better measurable service to the beneficiary. Thus, an integrated system, with a focus on the beneficiary, and deployed by an authority whose interests are above the interests of the process they own, is the only way to use and implement ICT to strengthen PDS. (d) Cash transfer system in lieu of distribution of foodgrains: The single most reason that accounts for massive leakages from PDS is the current system of transporting highly subsidized foodgrains through long distances. There is huge incentive for diversion of stocks before they reach FP shops. In order to deal with this challenge, it is possible to keep the prices of foodgrains at 31 market price, but go for transfer of differential cost as subsidy directly in to the account of the beneficiary households. This idea can be piloted in a few districts in the country and later depending on the experiences from ground, can be replicated across the country. The pilot districts should go in for issuance of smart cards to all the beneficiary households with the biometric data of all the households encrypted in the chip embedded into the smart card. The beneficiary households shall also be given a bank account. FP shop licenses in the pilot districts can be issued for more than one dealer. The FP shop dealers are expected to own a ‘Point of Sale Terminal’ which is connected to the Bank’s server through GPRS. As when the beneficiary household swipes the card at the ‘Point of Sale Terminal’ the beneficiary account gets updated and the beneficiary can transfer the amount into the account of the shop keeper. This arrangement will have the following advantages a. There is no incentive for the FP shop dealers to divert the foodgrains as the foodgrains are secured by him/her at market price and are to be sold at market price b. In this system, since there could any number of licensed FP shops in the village, the card holder will have choice of going to any licensed FP shop in the village or outside the village, and buy the foodgrains at market price, but pay to the shop keeper the subsidized price and also electronically transfer the subsidy from his account to the account of the shop keeper by swiping the card at the ‘Point of Sale Terminal’. c. This system would enable the beneficiaries to draw their rations from any shop in the country. Such portability of entitlements would make significant difference to the migrant workers in our country. 4.3.5. Leveraging existing learning and resources for optimal solutions: Convergence is recommended as a key guiding principle and needs to play a critical part in the conceptual framework to optimize costs, both financial and administrative and also to provide a seamless, empowering experience to citizens. There is a need to leverage resources in the form of smartcards, biometric databases, registration systems for beneficiaries as well as application systems of other stakeholders such as banks, transport companies, weighment centres to link up resources as well as information. 4.3.6. Beyond ICT: As is well understood, ICT cannot be a panacea to all evils. ICT interventions are not entirely effective due to constraints which have a non ICT solution. In the PDS system there are many processes which require non ICT interventions to strengthen the supply chain. These non -ICT interventions are also critical to ensure that the other ICT interventions are successful as they are all interlinked in the supply chain. What ICT can do in turn is to provide indications of problem areas which can then be used to design business process solutions that may not be related to technology alone. A few important non-ICT interventions are: a) Ensuring financial viability of FPS. Studies show that only 23% of FPS are financially viable. Some states like Kerala have tried to strengthen them by allowing them to stock and sell non PDS items. Other states are looking at providing them with credit. Institutional measures like providing them with 32 minimum stocks without waiting for regular monthly allocation, ensuring that PDS commodities are transported to them, and allowing them to pay in a consolidated fashion through online banking will ensure that the FPS are strengthened. b) A few states are also looking at strengthening the FPS by giving licenses to cooperatives. Chattisgarh is implementing a ‘deprivatization’ in this manner and in Tamil Nadu this has been met with a fair amount of success. c) At the storage level, both at FCI and the state godowns, the architecture and technology relating to storage can be improved in terms of providing better ramps for loading/unloading, providing improved storage platforms, and better design of godowns. d) Policy measures need to be taken regarding transportation. In Chattisgarh, private transporters at the state level have been removed and the Food and Civil Supplies Department is managing transportation from state godowns to the FPS. 4.4. Goal 4: Strengthening monitoring and reviewing arrangements, and improving transparency, accountability and grievance redressal mechanisms 4.4.1.Internal monitoring and review is critical to the successful implementation of any strategy. To do so, we propose first the creation of institutional arrangements at the mission, state and district level, which can progressively track and monitor progress of plans against indicated milestones. 4.4.2. At the mission level, quarterly reviews of state performance against MOUs should be undertaken by a Prime Minister Committee under the chairmanship of the Minister of Food and Civil Supplies. Likewise, at the level of individual states, steering committees should be set up under the chairmanship of the Chief Secretary. These committees should be mandated with the responsibility of undertaking quarterly reviews of district level procurement, storage and distribution plans, milestones set for decentralized procurement, ePDS, improving transparency and accountability and community participation etc. Similarly, district level committees under the District Collector should undertake quarterly review of the performance of districts. 4.4.3. Simultaneously, efforts should be made to improve transparency, accountability and grievance redressal as related to the PDS on the ground. The working draft of the NFS bill proposes several steps to do so. Once implemented, it is envisaged that they would go a long way in reforming the PDS into a more open and receptive food distribution system for common citizens. These steps include: Transparency measures: The first step in improving transparency around the PDS is to create awareness among beneficiaries on their rights, entitlements, prices, availability of essential items etc. This can be done through awareness campaigns designed in collaboration with the civil society that outline, clearly and simply, all these and the process and level of mandatory disclosure by all agencies in the supply chain. It is also proposed that a system of uniquely 33 numbered food coupons be initiated by each state government to track the distribution of grain to cardholders. These food coupons (booklets of monthly coupons for at least one year) can be printed in the ration card. In the event where coupons are replaced with Smart Cards or similar devices, they will not replace the printed ration cards. In addition, to create more transparency, it is suggested that each FPS a list of cardholders and their category, along with price list per unit of PDS commodity and available stock. Also, all households should be allowed the right for immediate and open inspection of records. In case households demand information regarding the functioning of the FPS, it should be made available to them within 15 days of application (over and above RTI) at a cost no more than the cost of photocopying. So that this measure is strictly enforced, violation of provisions of proactive disclosure of information should attract strict penalties. New design of and entries in ration cards: The draft NFS bill proposes that every ration card should include a clear “entitlements page”, written in simple words in the local language, with details of PDS entitlements as well as helpline numbers and grievance redressal facilities. It is also proposed that the manager of each Fair Price Shop be held responsible for ensuring that details of food transactions including date, time, quantity, price etc are promptly entered in the ration cards of the recipients, in legible writing, along with the manager’s signature. Tamper-proof and people-friendly receipts: It is proposed that each Fair Price Shop be equipped with a device to generate tamper-proof records of food transactions along with receipts that can be understood and approved by the card holders. Community and state monitoring: It is understood that transparency measures will come to naught in the absence of strict monitoring. Therefore it is proposed that extensive facilities be put in place to promote community monitoring of Fair Price Shops, including Helplines, SMS alerts, social audits, and Vigilance Committees. Particularly, the draft bill suggests that every Fair Price Shop have a Vigilance Committee of 5 members, of which at least 3 members be women, and a majority be PDS card holders attached to that Fair Price Shop. It is critical here that the Vigilance Committee does not include anyone involved in the management of the Fair Price Shop. In addition, FPSs may be selected randomly and regularly for inspection by inspectors and flying squads (from other districts). Raids and seizures too need to be a regular feature of the monitoring mechanism. Social audits: As part of community monitoring efforts, it is proposed that a social audit of each Fair Price Shop be conducted at least once a year at the Gram Sabha. It is proposed that the audit include reading aloud in public of a summary of transactions at FPSs in the previous 12 months. Strengthening grievance redressal: The draft NFS bill proposes the following measures to strengthen grievance redressal: a) Appointment of a sub-district level grievance redressal officer by the Department of Food; on failing to achieve redress, people can access independent District Grievance Redressal Officer, who will have the power to redress as well as to award fines and compensations. 34 b) District Grievance Redressal Officer may be appointed by the UPSC and by lateral entry from a wide range of applications, with a tenured deputation of 5 years extendable c) Any household that is vulnerable and eligible for a ration card but doesn’t have one can apply to the District Collector’s office, with an oral or written application. Investigations to be held within a time frame (15 days max) to determine whether the household is eligible; and a ration card to be provided within one month of conducting the enquiry irrespective of whether there is quota available for the same. d) PDS Lok Adalat on the lines of Bijli/Telephone Adalats can be formed to redress the grievances of the beneficiaries on the spot e) Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2001, amended in 2004 and appropriate criminal procedures can be used to impose penalties. f) Duty to fine when violations occur; compensations three times the cash value of the loss; fines to be charged at the level at which the violations were caused, list of violations being as follows: failure to keep fair price shop open during opening hours (except in cases of prior, written notice or permissible leave); refusing monthly entitlements to any household despite stock being available; failure to provide all eligible individuals PDS entitlements; deliberately excluding any household otherwise eligible for ration; including household/giving ration card to household otherwise not eligible; failure to display at all fair price shops/local body buildings list of all card holders in the area; failure to let persons, who so desire, inspect records of fair price shops; failure to conduct open,, transparent and inclusive social audits around PDS; failure to act upon findings of the social audit so conducted; failure to act on complaints to redress grievances 4.5. Goal 5: Promoting Community Participation 4.5.1. Currently participation of the local community in the Public Distribution System is very weak. It is not because the primary stakeholders don’t value their participation in the management of the PDS. It is because nowhere, such an environment for their participation is facilitated by the Government. This is in contrast to the growing recognition to the value of community participation in schemes that are intended to benefit the poor, whether it is MGNREGA, Watershed development, community lead sanitation program, education or health. Community participation is not fostered in PDS, because the department of civil supplies that manages PDS in most of the states in the country perceives itself as a regulatory agency, with no skills or conviction on community mobilization and participation. The quality of delivery of services in PDS can be significantly enhanced if community participation is fostered. Community participation does not happen unless supportive environment is in place. Following are the elements of supportive environment for fostering community participation: a) Areas for community participation: We strongly recommend participation of the BPL card holders in the preparation on annual PDS plans at the village level, monitoring of the functioning of FP shop at village level, by periodically inspecting the FP shop level registers and in the conduct of Quarterly Social Auditing of PDS in the village. 35 b) Institutional support to foster community participation: Self Help Groups of Women and their federations at the village level are the most suitable community based organizations at the village level to exert pressure on the FP shops to function as per the norms. c) Human capacity building: The leaders of the SHGs should be trained periodically, as community resource persons on monitoring the functioning of FP shops and in the conduct of Social Audits. The State government should draw an annual capacity building plan and ensure that the community resource persons are trained periodically. 4.5.2 Social Auditing of FP shops: Social Auditing is a community driven process where well trained and literate community members are empowered by the Gram Sabha to conduct auditing on the functioning of FP shop, by interacting with the card holders and verification of the stocks and records maintained at the FP shop. The findings of the social auditing are to be placed before Gram Sabha for discussion and decision. The decisions taken in the Gram Sabha, in case of any irregularities are to reported to Block/Taluk level functionaries of Civil supplies department for taking action. The decisions of the Gram Sabha are binding on the department and the department is expected to take follow up action expeditiously. 4.5.3 Management of Fair Price Shops by communities and women: We propose that while distributing licenses for Fair Price Shops, preference be given to community institutions or public bodies such as Gram Panchayats, Self-Help Groups, Cooperatives, etc. (in state led models). It is also proposed that Fair Price Shops be managed by women or women’s collectives. If these measures come into effect, it will be a landmark change from the existing system of distribution of licenses based on patronage. 4.5.4. Empowered role of Gram Panchayats and Gram Sabhas: The Gram Panchayats should be empowered to exercise close monitoring on the functioning of the FP shop(s) in their jurisdiction. Grievances from the cardholders, if any, should be received by the Gram Panchayat and follow up action to redress the grievance of the card holders should be taken by the Gram Panchayat. 4.5.5: Grain Bank: The Dept is already implementing a scheme called Grain bank scheme in the tribal areas. The scheme provides food security to the tribals by providing for procurement and storage of foodgrains produced by the tribals, in their habitations, so that same grains can be made available for PDS targeting the tribals. The scheme is working well in such areas where adequate attention has been paid for community mobilizatio. The dept should invest on building the capacities of the tri bals, particularly, the women in effectively managing the Grain bank scheme. 36 Chapter 5: Linkages between Strategic plan and RFD The RFD of the Dept of Food and Public Distribution has enlisted the following as their Mission, Objectives and Functions. Mission 1. Management of the food economy of the country through efficient procurement, storage and distribution of foodgrains (cereals). 2. Ensuring availability of foodgrains, sugar and edible oils through appropriate policy instruments. 3. Making foodgrains accessible at reasonable prices, especially to the weaker and vulnerable sections of the society Objectives 1. Procurement of wheat, rice /paddy and coarse grains for Central Pool under Price Support operations 2. Enactment of the National Food Security Act 3. Ensure availability of wheat and rice to meet requirement of TPDS and other welfare schemes and of sugar for BPL families. 4. To implement TPDS jointly with States and UTs 5. Review of sugar sector Policies with a view to reforms 6. Development/promotion of sugar industry. 7. Development of Warehousing Sector Functions 1. Formulation and implementation of national policies relating to procurement, movement, storage and distribution of foodgrains (cereals) through FCI & State Govts. 2. Implementation of the Public Distribution System with special focus on the poor; 3. Provision of storage facilities for the maintenance of central pool stocks of foodgrains(cereals) and promotion of scientific storage; 4. Formulation of national policies relating to buffer stocking, quality control and specifications of foodgrains(cereals); 5. Administration of food subsidies relating to rice, wheat, coarse grains and sugar; The Strategic document prepared by us clearly articulates the nuts and bolts of the strategy to be followed by the Department as far as Public distribution system is considered. The Strategy articulated by us is implementable as it is based on isolated and dispersed success stories captured from across the country. We have presented an integrated framework for action. The financial resources needed for implementing our strategy are meager considering the annual investment of around Rs 75,000 crores that go into Public distribution system. In view of this we feel that our strategic plan is completely aligned with the Dept’s RFD, but give much clearer and unambiguous approach to realize the objectives detailed in the RFD. Since the Government of India is committed to bring out National Food Security Act very shortly, it is our endeavour that PDS starts functioning with highest quality and efficiency from day, once the National Food Security Act becomes effective. Therefore it is our considered view that all the proposed actions in our strategic plan document merit highest priority . 37 Chapter 6: Cross departmental and cross functional issues 6.1 Successful functioning of PDS in the country is dependent upon effective coordination among a number departments/agencies of Government of India. Sustainable growth in agriculture sector is very critical for maintaining the PDS. If the agriculture growth does not keep pace with the population growth, procurement of requisite foodgrains into the central pool becomes a serious problem. The Department of Agriculture is expected to identify the interventions necessary to ensure that productivity of the agriculture is enhanced on sustainable basis to meet the foodgrains requirement under PDS. Food Corporation of India depends on RBI for availing food credit needed to manage it’s procurement operations. Timely provision of food credit is very important for FCI to manage it’s procurement operations smoothly. The Dept of Food and PDS of GOI need to coordinate with FCI, RBI and state governments to ensure smooth flow of food credit to FCI and state civil supplies corporations for managing procurement operations. The Dept of Food and PDS has to coordinate with Central Warehousing Corporations and the State Warehousing Corporations for ensuring expansion of storage capacities and also to ensure scientific storage of the foodgrains. The Dept also has to coordinate with the departments such as School education and Women and child development of Government of India and make available the foodgrians, for smooth functioning of Mid day meals scheme and ICDS. 38 Annexure 1: ICT initiatives undertaken by different states (Source: Wadhwa Committee report -Feb 2009 ) Haryana The proposal is to issue smart cards to each level of the distribution chain, i.e. the transporter, the FPS dealer and the consumer. In Haryana the agency which is performing the task of transportation of food grains from the godown to the FPS dealer is called the CONFED. In the proposed system, when the CONFED transporters take delivery from the godown, Depot Holder wise distribution information (i.e. the FPS details and quantity allotted) are loaded on the transporter’s smart card using the STT and 2 receipts are generated one for the transporter and the other is the copy for the godown in charge. In this system only a data entry is made and the weight of the stock loaded on the truck is not cross checked using an electronic weigh bridge in conjunction with the smart card. In order to eliminate human intervention to the maximum extent electronic weigh bridges should be used at all whole sale storage points and the stock loaded in the trucks should be checked using the electronic weigh bridge in conjunction with the smart card. When the truck reaches the FPS to deliver the stock, the CONFED transporter inserts his card in the Depot Holder’s STT. Stock gets automatically transferred in the Depot Holder’s terminal, the transaction report gets stored in the Transporters card and 2 receipt’s are generated, i.e. one for the FPS dealer and the other for the transporter. The consumer comes to the FPS for purchase of food grains, inserts his smart card in the STT, places his finger on the terminal for bio-metric verification. After the details are verified, the entitlement and price payable are displayed on the terminal. The FPS dealer thereafter completes the transaction by issuing the desired quantity to the consumer and the details of the transaction are loaded on the smart card and a paper receipt is simultaneously issued to the consumer. The system does not provide for authentication by the consumer, prior to the completion of the transaction as confirmation that the correct quantity of the stock has been issued to him. The system should verify the card of the consumer on its being inserted in the STT and there should be no need to verify the biometric details at this stage. It is only after the desired quantity is entered by the FPS dealer in the STT and the same is received by the consumer, should the consumer be required to authenticate the transaction by placing his finger on the designated spot on the STT, thereby confirming that the transaction has been completed to his satisfaction. If he does not do so it would signify that there is some deficiency in the transaction and the transaction would not be completed and recorded on the STT or the smart card. Karnataka Karnataka is the only State which has already commenced the actual implementation of computerisation of PDS operations. The Karnataka model does not contemplate issuing a smart card to the beneficiaries. The biometric details of members of each family, which constitute a unit for the purposes of allotment of stock, are loaded on the STT at the FPS to which the said family is connected. The beneficiary goes to the 39 FPS, enters his card number in the machine and the terminal displays his entitlement and the quota available for the month. The FPS dealer then enters the required quantity into the machine, the beneficiary places his finger on the machine authorizing the transaction, which is thereafter is completed. One crucial feature of the Karnataka Model is that the STT also provides a system of ‘voice over’ i.e. when the FPS dealer enters the quantity in the machine, a voice message is automatically generated, stating the quantity thereby making verification possible even for an illiterate person. Kerala The Food and Civil Supplies Corporation gets the grains from FCI godowns and whole-sellers do further distribution. As regards computerization initiatives, a project namely Target Efficient Transparent Rationing and Allocation (TETRA) in PDS is being implemented. The Tetra application comprises of modules for Ration Card Management and Food grains allocation & lifting. RCMS 3.0 Rations Card Management System is a workflow-based application, which covers various functions such as Issue of New Ration Cards, Addition of members, Reduction of member, Issue of Duplicate Ration card, Correction of names of members, Surrender of Ration Card etc. Allocation 1.0 covers the allocations, lifting and distribution of food grains at the wholesale and retail points to FPS. Together they also cover the FPS registration and licensing. Chattisgarh In Chhattisgarh unified Ration card database has been prepared which is used to generate computerized FPS Allocation, declaration of stock balance, Web based Truck Challan etc. Thus information regarding allocation, stocks, issue and sales for each FPS is now available on the central server. The State is also using Global positioning System (GPS) for tracking the movement of trucks carrying food grain. This web site based software also provides a method of citizen participation in monitoring of PDS where citizen can register their mobile no. or e-mail id and can participate in the monitoring of PDS.A call centre with a toll free number is also operational for any complaints or suggestions. Gujarat In Gujarat the State FCSC operates through its 192 distribution centers for supply of grains to FPSs. Ration Card computerization has been done across the State. Madhya Pradesh In the State of Madhya Pradesh the grain is stored at SWC and CWC godowns in addition to FCI godowns as this State has de-centralized procurement operations. For distribution to FPS the grain is lifted by Lead Societies and FPSs are run by Cooperative societies. The State has developed and implemented web based FPS wise 40 allocation off take monitoring software. The data is assimilated from the various FPS and entered at district level. The district wise FPS allocation and off take was being updated on monthly basis. However this has now been discontinued. Andhra Pradesh The State has taken initiatives for computerization of Ration card household data. The household survey was carried out for a large number of parameters and ration card parameters were a subset of that. For creation Ration Card Designated Photography Location (DPL) centers were setup to collect/ verify the declaration forms, enter the beneficiary data in the computer and IRIS scanning was done for each member of family. Ration card household application is a client-server based application. In AP, Every district is maintaining its own data but no mechanism has been established for updating the data or verifying it for duplicates/bogus ration cards. The data at present is not centralized and hence beneficiary verification across districts is not taking place. Bar-coded coupons were also introduced in the State. The coupons were given after manual verification of the beneficiary. This was a difficult process and hence personalized bar-coded coupons were introduced as pilot for kerosene and Rice. These coupons were delivered at the door-step of the card holder. However no mechanism has been set up for scanning of these coupons for verifying the actual distribution. Delhi In Delhi State the CSC pick up grain directly from FCI godowns and supplies it to FPSs. Therefore the IISFM implemented at FCI depots provides data on releases under TPDS but exact destination is not being captured currently. The feature can be incorporated once TPDS computerization scheme is initiated. The Ration Card survey data has been digitized and laminated cards have been issued. Tamilnadu Tamilnadu, being a DCP state, the States Civil Supplies Corporation is responsible for procurement, paddy milling, storage and distribution of food grains to FPS. The ration card application is a workflow-based application, which runs at the Taluk supply office for creations and modification of cards. It is implemented on pilot basis in north district of Chennai consisting of seven zones. The printing of the card is done at the Commissioner’s Office; means issuance of any new ration card is done centrally. The cards carry a hologram and are laminated. Tamilnadu also has applications that combine POS, smartcard, GPS solutions and software applications that track the functioning of FPS, the stock availability at various agencies , GPS tracking of PDS trucks and sms based alerts on stock positions and on distribution to various stakeholders including the beneficiary. 41 References Patnaik, U. 2007. “Neoliberalisim and Rural Poverty in India.” Economic and Political Weekly, July 28: 3132-3150 Patnaik, U. 2004. ‘The Republic of Hunger’, Social Scientist, Vol 32, Nos 9-10, September-October. Shah, Mander, Thorat, Deshpande and Baviskar. 2006. Untouchability in Rural India. New Delhi: SAGE India 42