SHIP DONATION INSPECTION PROGRAM: PROCESS, PROCEDURES, TRENDS, AND STATUS LT Robert A. Green, USNR SEA 03D (NR NAVSEA 1910) CDR Francis Chan, USNR SEA 04X (NR NAVSEA 901) List of Figures 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CDR Bruce Dinsmore, USNR SEA 03D (NR NAVSEA Det 1910) Naval Sea Systems Command 6. 7. USS Intrepid in action. Locations of donated ships Ship Donation Program Organization Ship Donation Inspection Program Process and Information Flow Assignment of Inspection Activity and Reporting Process Inspection Review Process Ship Inspection and Report Submission for 1998 Tables Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited 1. 2. The views expressed herein are the personal views of the authors and are not necessarily the official views of the Department of Defense nor the Naval Sea Systems Command. Abstract The mission of the NAVSEA PMS 334 Ship Donation Program Office is to promote the public interest in the defense of the nation and to commemorate historic deeds performed with, by, or against such ships and material. There are currently 45 museum and memorial ships donated by the Navy to nonprofit, not-for-profit, city, and state organizations located throughout the United States. The donated ships are required to be inspected yearly to ensure they are in a satisfactory material condition, safe for the public to visit and that the appearance of these ships portrays a positive image of the United States Navy. Due to the downsizing of active duty Navy field organizations and the resulting reduction of resources to perform inspections of donated ships, Naval Sea Systems Command initiated a pilot program in 1996 to use Naval Reserve Engineering Duty officers to fulfill this mission. The success of the pilot program has accelerated the transition of inspection work to the Naval Reserve Engineering Duty Officer Community. FY 1999 Donated Ships, Locations, and Units Responsible for Inspection Technical Assistance Provided to Inspecting Units Abbreviations HNSA – Historic Naval Ships Association NR – Naval Reserve NRED – Naval Reserve Engineering Duty Officer NSTM – Naval Ships’ Technical Manual SDP – Ship Donation Program SDIP – Ship Donation Inspection Program Introduction The purpose of the Navy Donation Program is to promote the public interest in the defense of the Nation and to commemorate historic deeds performed with, by, or against such ships and material. One method of accomplishing this purpose is to donate historic ships to local and state governments and nonprofit and not-forprofit organizations (hereafter referred to as nonprofit or donation organizations) for display. Figure 1 depicts one of the ships in the Ship Donation Program. Known as the “Fighting I” during World War II, USS Intrepid took part in the Battle for Leyte Gulf and survived the many hazards of that war including suicide plane “kamikaze” attacks. The USS Intrepid then went on to serve three tours in Vietnam, and to serve as the prime recovery ship for the manned space program. Decommissioned in 1974, Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th Figure 1. USS Intrepid in action. Donated Memorial Ships: The Living Museums Preserving Naval History the ex-Intrepid was converted to a museum in 1982 and continues to serve her country as a Donated Ship. i Public law, Title 10 Section 7306 provides authority for the Secretary of the Navy to transfer any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured vessel to States, Commonwealths, or possessions of the United States, as well as to any nonprofit or not-for-profit organization.. The Program Executive Office for Expeditionary Warfare (PEO EXW) manages the Ship Donation Program within the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA). This responsibility specifically resides with the Ship Donation Program Office, PMS 334 and technical authority is coordinated through the Engineering Directorate, NAVSEA 03. Inspections are planned, scheduled, and managed through the Logistics, Maintenance and Industrial Operations Directorate, SEA 04 and its field activities, the Naval Shipyards and Supervisors of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair (SUPSHIPs). Each ship donation is implemented via a donation contract with the Navy. This donation contract requires that the ship donations be maintained in a condition "satisfactory" to the Navy. To ensure that the ships are kept in a condition satisfactory to the Secretary, the contract also provides for periodic inspections. These periodic inspections are conducted in accordance with NAVSEA Instruction 4520.1. The intent of the inspections is as follows: To determine the overall material condition and appearance of the ship, to include its general preservation, safety and historical trends, which could indicate the need for more detailed tests and inspections. The inspections are to assist the donation ship organization to maintain and display the ship in a "fair and safe condition" reflecting favorably on the U.S. Navy. Prior to 1996, Naval Shipyards and SUPSHIP personnel were required to perform annual inspections of donated Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th 2 COBIA, Manitowoc, WI SILVERSIDES, Muskegon, MI YP 673, Southfield, MI COD, Cleveland, OH BECUNA, Philadelphia, PA OLYMPIA, Philadelphia, PA REQUIN, Pittsburgh, PA MARLIN, Omaha, NE U-505, Chicago, IL YP 671, Chicago, IL TURNER JOY, Bremerton, WA ALBACORE Portsmouth, NH CASSIN YOUNG, Boston MA J.P. KENNEDY JR.Fall River, MA LIONFISH, Fall River, MA MASSACHUSETTS, Fall River, MA SALEM, Quincy, MA BLUEBACK, Portland OR EDSON, New York, NY GROWLER, New York, NY INTREPID, New York, NY CROAKER, Buffalo, NY LITTLE ROCK, Buffalo, NY PATROL CRAFT, Buffalo, NY SULLIVANS, Buffalo, NY LING, Hackensack, NJ CONSTELLATION, Baltimore, MD TORSK, Baltimore, MD HORNET, Alameda, CA PAMPANITO, San Francisco, CA NORTH CAROLINA, Wilmington, NC ALABAMA, Mobile, AL DRUM, Mobile, AL KIDD, Baton Rouge, LA BOWFIN, Honolulu, HI MISSOURI, Honolulu, HI BATFISH, Muskogee, OK CLAMAGORE, Mt. Pleasant, SC LAFFEY, Mt. Pleasant, YORKTOWN, Mt. Pleasant, SC SC LEXINGTON, Corpus Christi, TX MINE SWEEPER, Forth Worth, STEWART, Galveston, TX TX CAVALLA, Galveston TX TEXAS, La Porte, TX Figure 2. Locations of donated ships. ships in their local areas. There are currently 45 ships in the Ship Donation Program located in 21 states around the country as depicted in Figure 2 below. Downsizing and base closures magnified the burden of the expenditures of personnel and travel funds to inspect the donated ships. The teaming effort between NAVSEA and Naval Reserve Engineering Duty (NRED) units to support these inspections was devised as a solution. This program has been well received by the donation ship organizations, the program sponsors (NAVSEA PMS 334, NAVSEA 03D, and NAVSEA 04X) and the NREDs who perform the deck plate inspections. The Naval Shipyards and SUPSHIPs can now optimize the use of personnel resources by delegating inspections to Naval Reserve (NR) detachments in the local area of the donated ships. The majority of the Naval Shipyards and SUPSHIPs have now delegated this requirement to the NREDs through SEA 04X4 assignment. These inspections provide NREDs the opportunity to utilize their technical skills and to train junior officers for mobilization by performing ship condition surveys. Furthermore, donated ship organizations benefit by having uniformed military personnel conducting the inspections onboard the ships. This paper presents an overview of the Ship Donation Program, (SDP), and provides a perspective of the entire process including ship assignment scheduling, resource 3 allocation, inspection performance, inspection attributes, report routing, and technical review. Specific training issues such as inspection techniques, proper completion of required inspection forms, and the technical review are also addressed. Significant trends in the inspection data and lessons learned are discussed as well. Ship Donation Program The Ship Donation Program (SDP) is implemented via a partnership among PMS 334, NAVSEA 03D and NAVSEA 04X. PMS 334 is the Program Manager for the Ship Donation Program and the primary point of contact between the Navy and the donated ship organizations. NAVSEA 03D provides technical authority for the SDP and technical management for the Ship Donation Inspection Program (SDIP). NAVSEA 04X as the resource manager provides the inspection resources through its field activities-- Naval Shipyards, SUPSHIPs and other NRED detachments. Figure 3 shows the program’s organization under PMS 334. Ship Donation Inspection Process The ship donation inspection process is set up to facilitate the planning, execution and reporting necessary to Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th Ship Donation Program Ship Donation, Materiel Ship Donation Inspection Program Ship Donation, Proposals SEA 03D5 Inspection Review SEA 04X4 Inspection Coordination NAVSEA Det 1910 NAVSEA Det 901 Units Performing Inspections (NAVSEA, S/Y, SUPSHIPs) Figure 3. Ship Donation Program Organization accomplish one of the missions of the Ship Donation Program. Figure 4 is a process flow diagram depicting the ship donation inspection and information flow. When a donation decision is made by the Secretary of the Navy, title is transferred and the donated ship enters the Ship Donation Program. PMS 334 notifies SEA 03D5 and SEA 04X4 of the recipient organization and site location. SEA 04X4 identifies a field activity close to the donated ship. SEA 04X4 then notifies PMS 334 and SEA 03D5 of the inspection activity assignment. after the first year of operation at the donated site. The inspecting activity (typically a Naval Reserve Unit) designated by NAVSEA notifies the donation ship organization in writing, requesting permission to conduct a ship inspection at least 30 days in advance of the proposed dates. After an inspection is completed, the results are prepared and a report is forwarded to NAVSEA 03D5 within 14 days. NAVSEA 03D5 reviews the inspection report within 45 days. The donation ship organization is notified of the final inspection results via a letter signed by PMS 334 within 60 days of the inspection. Training Opportunities Reservists for Naval The Ship Donation Inspection Program enables Naval Reservists to perform a core mission for NAVSEA, and it saves naval field activities significant funds. The Naval Reserve Engineering Duty officers have used these inspections to improve shipboard proficiencies that are needed to accomplish their mobilization missions. The shipboard training benefits to direct commissioned officers, particularly those junior officers with little to no shipboard experience, have been tremendous. Hands-on training is accomplished at “no additional cost” to the An initial inspection of the donated ship is performed PMS 334 Provide Ship with 30 days Advanc e Notice of Inspection Process Start Report Sent to SEA 03D5 Report Sent to NASVSEA Det 1910 SEA 04X4 Assigns Ship to Inspection Activity SEA 03D5 Reviews Edits & Forwards Letter PMS 334 Signs Letter Perform andComplete Inspection. NAVSEA Det 901 Assigns Ship to Reserve Unit Debrief to Ship Schedule Ships for 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Quarter Inspections Ship Receives Letter YES Det 1910 to Notify Reserve Unit of Receipt of Report and then Perform Analysis of Inspection Letter of Inspection Drafted by Det 1910 NO Review & Comment PMS 334 sends copies of letter to: SEA 04X4 SEA 03D5 NAVSEA Det 1910 Inspecting Unit Generate Baseline for Next Cycle Det 1910 Updates Database Figure 4. Ship Donation Inspection Program Process and Information Flow Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th 4 Navy with no materials or supplies provided by the Navy, while simultaneously accomplishing a mandated NAVSEA requirement. The seamless integration of the Naval Reserve personnel into the Ship Donation Inspection Program has resulted in a total force effort and serves as a model for future partnering. NREDs fulfill a mission requirement in direct support of NAVSEA, freeing field activities’ resources for other tasks. The program also provides an effective vehicle to highlight the presence of the Navy in local communities, as well as providing training opportunities for junior NRED officers. A great sense of mission for the entire Naval Reserve Engineering Duty Officer community is achieved in the process. Technical Administration In support of NAVSEA 03D5’s role as the technical authority for the Ship Donation Inspection Program, reservists from NR NAVSEA DET 1910 provide technical resources to review inspection reports, analyze trends and provide technical assistance to units performing these inspections. Their duties and responsibilities are as follows: (a) Coordinate ship inspection training (when requested by performing units); (b) Track submission of inspection reports; (c) Analyze the inspection process and inspection results for administrative improvement and material condition trends; (d) Review inspection reports and prepare forwarding letters. Ship Inspection Training A significant number of Naval Reserve Engineering Duty officers have fleet experience, advanced degrees and work experience in technical fields. NREDs have a unique blend of knowledge, skills and abilities that enable them to readily perform donated ship inspections. Despite their credentials, it is necessary to provide specific training for the personnel conducting these inspections, because of the non-operational nature of the donated ships. These inspections provide valuable hands-on experience inspecting ships that are often in need maintenance and repair as well as in assessing the material condition of the 5 ships. These types of inspections and assessments are related to those that may be performed during mobilization when Naval Reserve Engineering Duty Officers may be called on to perform battle damage assessments and recommend repair options. Prior to actually conducting an inspection, each Naval Reserve inspection team completes training on the basics of conducting an inspection of a donated ship. This training allows inspectors to be made aware of how an inspection is to be conducted and what specific items are being inspected. This training is normally conducted at an annual meeting of Naval Reserve Engineering Duty officers and efforts in progress to develop training materials that can be used at Reserve Centers across the nation. During the training, inspectors are informed that the purpose of the inspection is to determine if the donated ship is maintained in a condition “satisfactory” to the Navy and safe for the general public to visit. The Navy is interested in having the ship maintained in a condition that presents a favorable image of the Navy. Donated ship inspections are primarily visual in nature and based on maintaining watertight/weather-tight integrity. Tanks and voids are not entered unless properly certified and the appropriate equipment for conducting an inspection of those spaces is provided. Masts are not climbed unless they are properly staged and appropriate safety equipment is provided. The ship donation organizations are required to provide any needed equipment to conduct inspections and must therefore be given adequate notice of an inspection. Safety is a prominent consideration and point of emphasis in the inspection process. The manager of the Ship Donation Program (PMS 334) is promoting the use of information technology to improve the inspection process. For example, submission of inspection reports via an on-line process will enable the sharing of data, trend analysis, and pinpointing problem areas. Training and inspection tips via the World Wide Web will be included on the Ship Donation Program webpage which can be found at http://www.navsea.navy.mil/ndp/. A training video is also being planned that will allow off-site training to be conducted. Inspection Administration In support of the NAVSEA 04X4’s role as resource manager, NR NAVSEA 901 serves as the point of contact for coordinating the resources of the required annual Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th inspections on the donated ships. The duties and responsibilities of the Resource Manager, shown in Figure 5, are as follows: (a) Coordinate the assignment of qualified NREDs to perform required inspections; (b) Collect and process information on the scheduling and performance of donated ship inspections. P MS 334 Notified SEA 03D5 Reviews Report and Drafts Letter SEA 04X4 request assignment of Inspecting Activity Submit Report for Review NAVSEA DET 901 assigns Inspecting Activity NO Complete Inspection Report Inspecting Unit ACCEP TS? Debrief Donated Ship Organization on P reliminary Findings YES Request Visit to Ship Conduct Ship Inspection Establish Inspection Schedule Figure 5. Assignment of Ins pection Acti vity and Reporting Process Naval Reserve Support to the Ship Donation Inspection Program Twenty seven (27) Naval Reserve units with over 200 reservists are assigned to inspect 45 donated ships in 21 states. Table 1 tabulates the ship names, locations and assigned Naval Reserve units. Each unit plans the inspection in accordance with NAVSEA INSTRUCTION 4520.1 in coordination with the donated ship organization. The inspection activity provides qualified personnel and conducts the inspection in accordance with specified guidelines. In addition to using members assigned to these units, they are encouraged to recruit qualified Naval Reservists to augment their inspection force for larger ships. The donated ship organizations work with the inspecting activity to arrange a mutually agreeable inspection date, and they also provide necessary resources to ensure a safe inspection of the ship. Inspection Procedures To assist personnel in inspections, an Inspection Guide has been developed and distributed to the inspectors. The Ship Donation Inspection Program Guide is a five-page document consisting of eight sections, which provides general guidance to the inspectors. Specific inspection procedures are detailed in NAVSEA INSTRUCTION 4520.1. Donated ship inspection requirements are derived from Naval Ships’ Technical Manual (NSTM) Chapter 050, “Inactivation and Maintenance of Ships and Craft”, with applicable sections highlighted for the donated ships. NSTM 050 is used for guidance only in conducting and maintaining ship donations; the Navy neither requires nor expects the donation organizations to maintain their vessels at the level required for the Inactive Fleet. Three types of inspections are listed in section 4 of the Inspection Program Guide. The first type is the annual Material Condition Inspection which is conducted by the inspection activity. The second is an Overview/Organization (walk through) Management Control Review, normally conducted separately by NAVSEA HQ personnel. The third type of inspection is a Follow-up /Technical Assist, which is performed at the request of PMS 334 and focuses on specific issues of concern identified in a previous Material Condition Inspection. NREDs conduct the annual Material Condition Inspections. These inspections are closely coordinated with the donated ship organizations and are often conducted during periods of regular maintenance. This permits easier access to certain spaces and minimizes disruptions to the ship’s staff and normal operations. The Material Condition Inspection consists of a visual inspection of the entire donation ship, including spaces designated by: Category A: external and general areas; Category B: internal compartments and passageways open to the public; Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th 6 Ship Unit Location Ship Unit Location Alabama M obile, AL NAVSEA 1910 Cavalla Galveston, TX PHD NSWC 510 Drum M obile, AL NAVSEA 1910 Turner Joy Bremerton, WA NSY Puget HQ 222 U-505 Chicago. IL NWS York 1013 Cobia M antiowoc, WI NAVSEA 1602 YP 671 Chicago, IL NWS York 1013 Pampanito San Francisco, CA SUPSHIP 920 Kidd Baton Rouge, LA SUPSHIP 110 Requin Pittsburgh, PA NSY NORVA 405 J.P. Kennedy Jr. Fall River, M A SUPSHIP 401 Bowfin Honolulu, HI NSY PHARB 320 Lionfish Fall River, M A SUPSHIP 401 Cassin Young Boston, MA NSY PORTS NH 201 M assachusetts Fall River, M A NSY Ports 201 YP-673 Southfield, M I SUPSHIP 1013 Salem Quincy, M A NSY Ports 101 North Carolina Wilmington, NC NSY PORTS NH 507 Constellation Baltimore, M D NSY NORVA 206 Ling Hackensack, NJ SUPSHIP 502 Torsk Baltimore, M D SUPSHIP 306 Edson New York, NY SUPSHIP 502 Silversides M uskegon, M I SUPSHIP 1013 Growler New York, NY SUPSHIP 502 M arlin Omaha, NE NSY PHarb 116 Cod Cleveland, OH SUPSHIP 1013 Albacore Portsmouth, NH NAVSEA 901 Batfish M uskogee, OK NAVSEA DET 811 Croacker Buffalo, NY NSY NORVA 405 Clamagore Mt. Pleasant, SC NSY NORVA 507 Intrepid New York, NY PM S Wash 302 Laffey Mt. Pleasant, SC NSY NORVA 507 Little Rock Buffalo, NY NSY Ports 602 Yorktown Mt. Pleasant, SC NSY NORVA 507 Patrol Craft Buffalo, NY NSY Ports 602 Lexington Corpus Christi, TX NAVSEADET 811 Sullivans Buffalo, NY NSY NORVA 405 M ine Sweeper Fort Worth, TX NAVSEADET 811 Blueback Portland, OR NSY Puget 222 Stewart Galveston, TX NAVSEADET 811 Becuna Philadelphia, PA NAVSEA 304 Texas La Porte, TX NAVSEADET 811 Olympia Philadelphia, PA NAVSEA 1404 M issouri Honolulu, HI To Be Determined Hornet Alameda, CA To Be Determined Table 1. FY 1999Donated Shi ps, Locations, and Units Responsi ble for Inspections. Category C: internal compartments and passageways not open to the public. General areas of inspection are as follows: Administration & Security Access Engineering Fire & Safety Hull Preservation & Cleanliness Tour Routes Health & Sanitation Each area has a list of specific attributes. 7 Actual inspection sheets are available on the Ship Donation Program office web site on the NAVSEA web page at http://www.navsea.navy.mil/ndp/. Once the inspection has been completed, the inspecting activity forwards the inspection results as outlined in section 7 of the Guide to SEA 03D. Electronic submissions are encouraged. Technical Review of the Inspection Once the inspection report is received by SEA 03D, a technical review is conducted as depicted in Figure 6. The inspection report is reviewed for completeness, technical and safety concerns, and trends in preservation and material condition. The inspecting unit may be Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th contacted by NR NAVSEA Det 1910 for clarification of any questions or issues associated with the inspection. extracted as needed. This database also provides baseline data for future inspections. The current inspection report is compared to the previous year’s reports and conditions that do not meet the inspection criteria are noted. These problems conditions are coded Red, Yellow or Green: Resource Management Review of the Inspection Results Red indicates a condition that demands immediate attention such as a safety hazard or a maintenance concern such as a hole in the hull. Yellow indicates a condition that needs to be addressed such as pitting of the hull because of lack of preservation or cathodic protection. Green indicates a condition that should be addressed such as lighting in off tour route areas. A letter is drafted for PMS 334 signature and issued to the donated ship organization. Using this information NAVSEA Det 1910 enters the inspection data into a database from which trends and other information can be The ship inspection assignment and scheduling processes are coordinated to ensure timely and complete execution of the required tasks. Inspections are scheduled on a fiscal year basis. This ties in well with PMS 334’s reporting to the Historic Naval Ship Association (HNSA) on the status of the program. HNSA has its annual conference in October at which time PMS 334 provides the status of completed inspections. HNSA also has an executive board meeting in March when PMS 334 reports on the status of inspection reviews. An analysis of the schedule performance for FY98 indicates that inspection dates should be moved forward to the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. Figure 7 shows ship inspections and report submission performance for FY98. The cumulative report submission lags the inspection by about a month until September, and the time lag increases from that point on. Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th 8 45 40 # inspected (I) # reported (R) cumulative (I) cumulative (R) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Nov-98 Oct-98 Sep-98 Aug-98 Jul-98 Jun-98 May-98 Apr-98 Mar-98 Feb-98 Jan-98 Dec-97 Nov-97 Oct-97 Sep-97 0 Figure 7. Ship Inspection and Report Submi ssi on for FY 1998 The primary reason for the increase in time lag is the periodic transfer of key personnel in the Reserve Units. Naval Reserve Officers receive orders for new unit assignments on 01 October. This often results in a 30 50% turnover of personnel in a unit. Units that perform inspections late in the fourth quarter increase the risk of the inspection report not being completed on time because of the loss of key personnel on the inspection team. To address this issue, NAVSEA 04X4 plans to move the August and September inspection dates forward by one month to minimize the number of late reports. Another initiative in scheduling is to level the workload over a 12month period. This will reduce the technical review backlog at NAVSEA 03D5 and allows better technical support of inspecting units. 9 Technical Review of Inspection Results Technical deficiencies found during the inspections are being analyzed and reviewed for trends. NAVSEA 03D5 (supported by NR NAVSEA 1910) also analyzes ship conditions based on the inspection reports. Every inspection attribute is tabulated and compared with previous results to spot trends such that follow-up inspections/technical assistance may be targeted to solve high priority problems. Since most ships have been inspected twice since the start of the revitalized program, some trends are evident. Two common trends are inadequate maintenance plans and the lack of a sounding and security plan. Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th While donated ship organizations are performing some maintenance on a regular basis, many lack formal maintenance plans which address long-term maintenance items such as hull preservation. Since many of the donation ship organizations rely on donations and visitor fees for maintenance funding, adequate planning must be conducted to set aside funds needed for high-cost maintenance items. Donation ship organizations use Navy ship inspection reports to help prepare maintenance packages for their ships. Sounding and Security plans for spaces inside the ships typically below the waterline have been found lacking on several ships. These plans are needed to allow for early detection of leaks in the hull and tanks. At one extreme, this can cause a stability problem for the ship should flooding be excessive. A good plan will allow relatively minor leaks to be detected early and repaired before they become major leaks. Donated ship organizations are informed of the frequency that various soundings and checks should be made when the final report is submitted to them. The inspectors, the donated ship organizations, and other entities such as the Historic Naval Ships Association (HNSA) provide regular feedback on the inspection program throughout the year. This valuable input is incorporated into revised inspection sheets and guides. Deficiencies Holes in the hull Pitting in the hull Electrical Safety Cathodic Protection System Lifelines Lessons learned during inspections are also shared with all inspectors through inspection document revisions and through training sessions. As a result, the Ship Donation Inspection Program is evolving through a process of continuous improvement. One of the most important functions of NAVSEA 03D’s responsibilities as technical authority for the Ship Donation Program is the evaluation and resolution of technical issues raised by the inspection teams in the field and the program office. Some typical deficiencies and associated technical recommendations are summarized in Table 2. Conclusions The Ship Donation Inspection Program is a “WIN-WIN” partnership between U.S. Navy active forces and its Naval Reserve components for completion of required annual inspections of donated ships. What began as a pilot program with initial emphasis on mobilization training of Reserve Forces has evolved into a program whereby Reserve Forces are providing direct support to NAVSEA in accomplishing its Secretary of the Navy assigned mission. The downsizing of the active duty field activities caused a Technical Solutions Temporary patches Clad weld Doubler plates if not strength member. Replace with “like” and “in kind” material Clear and preserve Cathodic Protection System Filling co mpounds such as Chockfast, Belzona if less than 25 % o f thickness. Clad weld Doubler plates if not strength member IEEE code for marine application Ground strap Maintain hull zincs Ground strap Portable impressed current cathodic protective system Permanent ICCP system Original Design General Specificat ions for Ships OSHA CFR Local Code Comments Filling co mpounds such as Chockfast, Belzona are only for temporary repairs Corrosion accelerates as preservative covering fails and pitting increases Rubber mating in front of energized switchboards Non-functioning unit will not protect fully Mis-functioning unit will pull metal off the hull Fence off areas with Yellow safety line and signs Table 2. Technical assi stance provided to donated ships Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th 10 shortage of personnel, and many found that they did not have the resources to continue annual inspections in the manner in which they should be conducted. To continue performing inspections would have required significant travel costs and additional workload burdens on NAVSEA’s active duty Field Activities. The NREDs have responded by taking an increasingly active role in the performance of the required inspections and technical analysis of the results, in direct support of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) mission. The Ship Donation Inspection Program evolved to rely heavily on the technical and engineering expertise of Naval Reserve Engineering Duty (NRED) Officers. Reservists located near these donated ships have demonstrated that they can inspect them at no cost to Naval Sea Systems Command, while gaining useful mobilization training in assessing the material condition of the ships. The improved analysis of results, including detailed trending and compiling of information in a central database, has significantly upgraded the technical aspects of this program. These changes have resulted in better training for Reservists, more responsive support to donated ship organizations, and significant cost savings of approximately $2.43 million per year to the Navy. Annual inspections help ensure that donated ships are properly maintained by the nonprofit organizations, that they are safe for the visiting public and reflect positively on the history and heritage of the United States Navy. This program is a WIN-WIN-WIN-WIN. A WIN for the Navy as a good promotional and heritage program. A WIN for PMS 334, the Program Manager, who does not possess the resources to conduct the inspections and develop the resulting reports. A WIN for the Naval Reserve in that mobilization training is provided. And finally, a WIN for the nation and local communities in which the ships are located. i Historic Naval Ships, Naval Action Series. Spring 1998. Challenge Publications, Inc. Canoga Park, CA. p. 61. 11 Association of Scientists and Engineers 36 Annual Technical Symposium – 23 April 1999 th