September 24, 2014 Rigorous Simulation of Heat Exchanger Networks: ® ® PRO/II - HTRI This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual future conditions (including economic conditions, energy demand, and energy supply) could differ materially due to changes in technology, the development of new supply sources, political events, demographic changes, and other factors discussed herein (and in Item 1A of ExxonMobil’s latest report on Form 10-K or information set forth under "factors affecting future results" on the "investors" page of our website at www.exxonmobil.com). This material is not to be reproduced without the permission of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Linking Third Party Software Heat Exchanger Network Simulation – 2014 Process Heat Transfer Modeling - Perspective 1941- 1962 Fouling Factors Established; Kern, McAdams, Tinker, Bell-Delaware First TEMA® design methods are published to members 1962 - 1963 HTRI® Founded Delaware Research Project issued Final Report 1967 HTRI® Publishes Stream Analysis Method (Tinker) Programmable, electronic desktop calculators become affordable 1977 - 1981 Apple® Computer Introduces Apple® I personal computer (4K memory) Most PC’s provide 32K chip memory allowing program design methods 1987 HTRI® releases first PC version of Shell & Tube software 1990’s Property Generation from a stream in PRO/II® to HTRI® HEXTRAN® makes it possible to analyze complex heat exchanger Networks 2000 - 2014 Process Simulators linked to 3rd Party Specialty software 2015 – (?) Specialty 3rd Party Software embedded in Process simulators to permit rigorous modeling of process equipment 3 The heat exchanger design process Design is based on specified process conditions, materials, fouling factors, etc. ‘As-Built’ hardware is expected to meet / exceed duty within hydraulic limits Each service designed as a discrete unit operation – MANUAL Steps to move Data No check of impact to the overall system through rigorous flowsheet modeling of vendor supplied equipment – No FEEDBACK Mechanism Unexpected performance may result from ‘as-built’ accumulative overdesign and variance from ‘design’ temperature / pressure profiles Process Data Design Conditions Materials of Construction Heat Transfer Data Sheet Setting Plan Mat’l Requisition Installation Startup Operation Troubleshoot 4 HTRI® (Heat Transfer Research Inc.) Design, Rate, and Simulate Heat Transfer Equipment Rigorous Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Calculations Interfaces to Process Simulators, Physical Property Banks, Mechanical Design Programs, Microsoft Excel®, etc. CAPE-OPEN Compliant Applications 5 Simulating Heat Exchanger Networks - Linking PRO/II® to HTRI® PRO/II® simulates process conditions (H&MB) HTRI® designs and simulates (nearly) all types of heat exchangers HTRI® provides a variety of CAPE-OPEN compliant exchanger types CAPE-OPEN is an industry software standard which allows different 3rd party process/equipment modeling software to ‘talk’ to each other PRO/II® Implementation of HTRI CAPE-OPEN will interface to 7 unique HTRI® modules In addition, the COM Server provides a seamless interface for PRO/II® to communicate with Xist® (Shell & Tube) and Xace® (Air Coolers) PRO/II® LINK HTRI® 6 COM Server (Xist® & Xace®) CAPE-OPEN Linking PRO/II® with HTRI® • Com Server Interface (Preferred) Full functionality of HTRI® for S&T® (Xist®) and Air Coolers (Xace®) Seamlessly flanges PRO/II® to HTRI® Improved stability, fewer issues with inconsistencies • CAPE-OPEN Interface Permits linking to other HTRI® supported Unit Operations May not provide 100% of the HTRI® functionality 9 Simple Heat Exchanger Network PRO/II® ~ 2-3 seconds HTRI® embedded > 1 minute Slightly More Complex Exchanger Systems Cold End Modeling using HTRI® Xpfe® via CAPE-OPEN Interface Rigorous Model in lieu of LNG Block H&MB CAPE-OPEN links PRO/II® to Xpfe ® Cold Box Simulation Xpfe® Simulation checks profiles, integration effectiveness PRO/II® - HTRI® (Xpfe®) Integration (This is Significant) Stand-alone modeling of a single unit operation PRO/II® links Xpfe® via CAPE-OPEN Xpfe® is not connected to other flowsheet elements; does not exchange data or contribute to the main flowsheet solution CAPE-OPEN Unit Operations calc’s occur after flowsheet solves Stand-alone modeling of a Cold Box exchanger train looks promising Still in early stages of testing, implementation, and validation SIGNIFICANT time savings for engineers 13 PRO/II® - HTRI® (Xpfe®) Integration (This is More Significant) Integrated modeling PRO/II® links Xpfe® via CAPE-OPEN (same as stand-alone) Xpfe® is fully connected to other flowsheet elements Xpfe® Unit Operations calc’s occur as flowsheet solves Integrated modeling of Cold Box exchanger train is challenged Fails to solve in some cases Could be operator error but robustness / stability should be investigated by software vendors to improve Opportunity for SIGNIFICANT time savings for engineers 14 Quick (or not so quick) DEMO PRO/II® - HTRI ® Integration - What are the Benefits? Energy / Margin Credits (% OPEX, CIT, other) Process Optimization and Improved Integration of Exchanger Networks Species Targets (H2, other) “U” x Surface Area (UA) = Opportunity Property Generation is freaky fast Facilitates ‘what if’ analysis Analysis for Fouling Modeling / Reduction Benefits from combination of integration / rigorous modeling 16 Optimize Heat Exchanger Design in the Network Basic design – know the parameters! Q = UA (f) LMTD Q U A LMTD = duty = overall heat transfer coefficient = surface area = Log Mean Temperature Difference Pressure Drop Inside tube heat transfer coefficient (ℎ𝑖 ) for turbulent flow inside tube varies ~ 𝑚0.8 Δ𝑃 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 ~ 𝑚2 A realistic pressure drop should be determined at this stage to avoid re-work Fouling predictive models may include pressure drop as one of the mitigating parameters; i.e. fluid shear, temperature, etc. (𝑮𝑻𝑻𝑫 − 𝑳𝑻𝑻𝑫) 𝑳𝑴𝑻𝑫 = 𝑮𝑻𝑻𝑫 𝐥𝐧 𝑳𝑻𝑻𝑫 𝟏 U= [ 𝟏 𝒉𝒐 𝟏 𝑬𝒇 + 𝒓𝒘 + 𝒓𝒊 𝑨𝒐 𝑨𝒊 + 𝟏 𝑨𝒐 𝒉𝒐 𝑨𝒊 ] 17 Benefits Conceptualization, FEED, Revamps, and EPC – get it right from the start Rigorous modeling will lead to valuable collaboration w/Specialists Accurate Heat Transfer (U), Pressure Drop (P), and Vibration Analysis Benefit / Cost for margin, energy, reliability, cost, maintenance (basis) Identify ‘Enhanced’ Heat Transfer Opportunities Benefits Acceptable modifications for revamp exchangers Specialty Exchangers – model these using CAPE-OPEN / HTRI Module Identify TEMA Type constraints when considering possible modifications Start of Run, End of Run, Turndown conditions can highlight possible pitfalls / avoid rework in the next phase of engineering Benefits Screen for damaging flow-induced tube vibration or acoustic resonance at higher flowrates, different feeds, other Dynamic pressure impact to equipment (rho-V2 i.e. erosion) Identify unacceptable temperature profiles / temperature approaches Integrated reporting (All Unit Ops / H&MB) in one place Thermodynamic models and data seamlessly match up with ‘as-built’ geometry and process conditions Where do we go from here? Provide Feedback to the Software Vendor(s) Rigorous Simulation – Go Faster! Stability Improvements needed for complex flowsheets Provide hidden workaround when HTRI unit operation encounters fatal error Simplicity for invoking HTRI® (toggle back and forth) Kettles / Thermosyphon (flowsheet communication, detailed piping, etc.) Enhanced Graphing capability in Networks across multiple exchangers Implement HEXTRAN® Functionality in PRO/II® HTRI® Design Mode Heat Integration / Pinch Analysis Monitoring (data acquisition, conditioning, reconciliation, fouling trends) 21 Questions? Thank you