View Full Publication - Texas Public Policy Foundation

advertisement
10/17/13
Supreme Court Denies Review in Casket Case, Monks' Victory Stands | National Review Online
Google+
October 28 Issue
Subscribe Print
Subscribe Digital
Gift: NR Print
Gift: NR / Digital
Follow @nro
Like
25k
Home
The C orner
The Agenda
Audio, Video & Galleries
Log In
Register
Kudlow
ARTICLES
Mona Charen - Stephen
Hawking’s Warped Moral
Calculus
C ampaign Spot
Pryce-Jones
AUTHORS
Exchequer
RSS
Mark Steyn - Obama’s
Melting Wings
Home Front
STORE
Right Field
Phi Beta C ons
DONATE
Mark Steyn - Honor Killing
MEDIA KIT
Bench Memos
Media Blog
C ritical C ondition
Human Exceptionalism
SUBSCRIPTION HELP
Michael Barone - Flipping
the Senate
The Feed
Planet Gore
Events
Tweet Tracker
CONTACT
The Long-term Effects of
LASIK: What You Need to
Know
4 Places You Should Avoid
Using Your Credit Card
Bankrate
See For Yourself
by Taboola
Enter the terms you wish to search for.
Bench Memos
Search
NRO’s home for judicial news and analysis.
About
Archive
E-Mail
RSS
Supreme Court Denies Review in Casket Case,
Monks’ Victory Stands
By Vikrant P. Reddy
Octob er 15, 2 013 6:00 PM
Like
12
Tw eet
12
Share
2
0
Print
Text
This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court decided against reviewing Saint Joseph
Abbey v. Castille. This means that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in favor of the monks
of Saint Joseph Abbey — a significant victory against overcriminalization and
unnecessary licensing — will stand.
Your E-Mail Here
For decades, the unlicensed sale of a funeral casket in Louisiana has been
punishable by heavy fines and up to 180 days in prison. In 2007, the Benedictine
(Simply insert your e-mail and hit “Sign Up.”)
monks of Saint Joseph Abbey began manufacturing and selling cypress caskets to
support themselves. The caskets were sold for far less than they are at most other
funeral homes – sometimes at a quarter of the price. Although the monks perform
no other funeral services, they were enjoined from selling the caskets by the
Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors.
As Megan McArdle observed, it is “hard to imagine any reason that the state needs
www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/361325/supreme-court-denies-review-casket-case-monks-victory-stands-vikrant-p-reddy
1/3
10/17/13
Supreme Court Denies Review in Casket Case, Monks' Victory Stands | National Review Online
to get into regulating the procurement and sale of . . . wooden boxes.” It is
especially hard to imagine how a violation of the regulation could possibly justify
the heavy-handed sanction of incarceration.
Federal courts are extremely sympathetic to a state’s assessment of what is
necessary to ensure public health and safety, and they often find that as long as a
state can offer any “rational basis” for a regulation, it will be upheld. In this case,
the district court was unable to determine any rational basis whatsoever for
Louisiana’s protection of what Professor Jonathan Adler calls a “coffin cartel.”
In March, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court and noted that the deference
extended to a state’s defense of a regulation “does [not] require courts to accept
SUBSCRIBE TO NATIONAL REVIEW
nonsensical explanations.”
Louisiana sought Supreme Court review of the Fifth Circuit’s decision, but today’s
Print
Digital
iOS
Google
Android
denial of certiorari means the case is finally over. This is welcome news for the
monks, for their lawyers at the Institute for Justice, and for residents of the three
states under the Fifth Circuit’s jurisdiction: Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi.
Other states, however, are not quite as fortunate. A circuit split exists on this
question because of the Tenth Circuit’s 2004 opinion in a similar case, Powers v.
Harris. The Tenth Circuit covers Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Utah, and Wyoming. Until the split is resolved, other federal courts may decide
whether they are more persuaded by the logic of the Tenth Circuit or the Fifth
Circuit. (Note: In 2002, the Sixth Circuit, in Craigmiles v. Giles, adopted the
position that the Fifth Circuit has adopted.)
In the meantime, residents of the Tenth Circuit who do not want to see prison bars
should avoid selling wooden boxes.
— Vikrant P. Reddy is policy analyst for the Texas Public Policy Foundation and
the foundation’s Right On Crime initiative.
Like
12
Tw eet
12
Share
2
0
Print
From Around the Web
Are You Paying Credit Card
Interest? Stop Now!
Next Advisor
Text
by Taboola
Low-Cost And No-Cost Ways
To Promote Your Small
Business
The Five Best Brunches in
Paris | Webflakes
Webflakes
U.S. Bank Connect
www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/361325/supreme-court-denies-review-casket-case-monks-victory-stands-vikrant-p-reddy
2/3
Download