BMGT 305: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT Section 4072 University of Maryland University College College Park, MD Syllabus Spring 2002 Term Starts: January 29, 2002 Term Ends: March 19, 2002 Session Location: College Park, CHE 2140 Instructor: Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. 17644 Raven Rocks Road Bluemont, VA 20135 cwford@ravenrocks.com www.ravenrocks.com 540-554-2362 9:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. (If I’m out of my office, leave any length message. I will return your message with 24 hours.) 703-777-8615 Fax Course Description: An introduction to the ways in which organizations create, identify, capture, and distribute knowledge, i.e., knowledge management (KM). Topics include knowledge management principles; new organizations and intellectual capital; integration of human resources, training and development, information systems, and business units to implement knowledge management strategies; and new roles and responsibilities for knowledge workers. Course applications require PC, modem, and Internet service provider. This is a WebTychoenhanced course. Welcome and Introduction Welcome to BMGT 388C, Knowledge Management! I’m delighted to be your instructor for this course. As a management and education consultant, I see knowledge management at work in a variety of organizations all the time. Whether the organization is part of the private sector, government, or higher education, the challenge of and need for managing information and knowledge is a constant in our information-overloaded world. In fact, many organizations already are managing knowledge—at least to some extent—and don’t even realize it! My academic background combines social sciences with humanities. Armed with data collection skills learned as an archaeologist and ethnographer, I went on to study American civilization, Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management focusing on nineteenth and twentieth century culture, a period of intellectual fermentation and major technological change. Over the last twenty-five years, I have worked as an administrator, manager, and teacher. For the past decade, I’ve worked in management training and education. I emerged from my studies and employment experiences with a keen interest in how people in organizations learn, how work gets done, and why some organizations succeed and others fall short. My interest in knowledge management relates to my focus on the future of human resources, specifically increased productivity, work quality, job satisfaction, and organizational learning. Now let’s turn to the guts of the course. BMGT 305, Knowledge Management, is an introduction to a relatively new discipline that focuses on the ways organizations learn to create, identify, and capture knowledge, and, in turn, distribute that knowledge to the people who need it, when they need it. Implemented successfully, knowledge management adds value and increases the bottom line. This course consists of the five modules: 1. Knowledge Management Fundamentals 2. Knowledge Management and Organization Culture 3. Knowledge Workers: New Roles and Responsibilities 4. Identifying, Creating, Sharing and Measuring Knowledge 5. Knowledge Management Today and Tomorrow A WebTycho classroom will be provided for BMGT 305.You will need a UMUC computer account to access the classroom. To get an account (with a login ID and a password ID), call 800807-4862 or e-mail webtychosupport@umuc.edu. To take TOUR 101 and to access the BMGT 305 classroom, go to tychousa.umuc.edu. (See A Learner-Centered Environment below for more details.) During class time and online we’ll discuss key terms and concepts; historical background; knowledge management benefits and principles; organizational culture and barriers to knowledge management; the shift toward creating jobs designed to focus on managing knowledge; knowledge creation, exchange, transfer and return on investment; and KM’s future as a discipline and crucial component of the marketplace. The course assignments and in-class activities are a blend of conceptual and theoretical readings and practical, how-to guidance oriented toward managers interested in increasing their understanding of and skills for managing knowledge. Our theme this term will be the relationship between knowledge, productivity and leadership. Course Goals Establish a foundation of key terms and concepts, historical events and contributions, organizational benefits, and guiding principles on which to build greater understanding of knowledge management Explore the relationship between knowledge management and organization leadership models. Increase recognition of the importance of organization culture to the success of knowledge management Provide historical and contemporary context for the evolution and role of knowledge workers Increase information and understanding about knowledge transfer using low- and hightechnology strategies Explore the future of knowledge management and its influence on our jobs, communities, and society Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management Course Objectives After completing this course, you should be able to: Explain key KM terms and concepts Summarize KM’s history Discuss KM’s benefits and guiding principles Analyze leadership models vis-à-vis managing knowledge Explain the culture metaphor and its relationship to KM within organizations Examine specific cultural issues critical to KM’s success Determine when those issues become barriers to effective KM processes and what solutions and interventions are appropriate Explain the concept of today’s knowledge worker Summarize the history of the rise of knowledge workers Discuss new jobs, roles and responsibilities resulting from the New or Knowledge Economy Examine the relationship between human capital (people) and technology in identifying, creating, sharing information and knowledge Suggest people-centered strategies and practices to enable knowledge identification, creation and sharing Suggest appropriate technology solutions to meet knowledge storage and transfer goals Discuss the reason for and various types of KM measurement methods and applications Discuss KM’s leading edge strategies, concepts and experts influencing future directions Ponder KM’s current and future impact on individuals, organizations and society at large Summary of Required Assignments Type of Assignment 1. Internet Research 2. Mid-term Exam 3. Final Project 4. Final Exam 5. General Participation Due Date February 7; March 7 February 19 March 14 March 19 Throughout course term Course Materials “Creating an Informal Learning Organization,” [no author]. Harvard Management Update, No. U0007A. Order @ http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/subscriptions/hbr/index.html “Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge,” by Peter F. Drucker. California Management Review Reprint Series, Vol. 41, No. 2, Winter 1999. Order @ http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/subscriptions/hbr/index.html “Looking Ahead: Implications of the Present,” by Peter F. Drucker, Esther Dyson, Charles Handy, Paul Saffo and Peter M. Senge. Reprint 97503. Order @ http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/subscriptions/hbr/index.html “The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice, by Rudy Ruggles. California Management Review Reprint Series, Vol. 40, No. 3, Spring 1998. Order @ http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/subscriptions/hbr/index.html Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management “What Managers Should Know about How Adults Learn,” by Edward Prewitt. Harvard Management Update, No. U9701B. Order @ http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu/subscriptions/hbr/index.html Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, by Thomas H. Davenport and Larry Prusak. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. Internet Readings: See Assigned Internet Readings listed under the course modules in the Course Schedule section below. Be prepared to discuss your answers to the questions provided. There are no graded written assignments based on the Internet Readings; however, your contributions to class discussions and activities and to online exchanges drawing from theses readings will count as part of your General Participation grade, and will be very helpful when completing the Internet Research Assignments described in detail under Course Assignments. A Learner-Centered Environment Participation in the face-to-face class sessions and online communication is very important. There will be learning activities and small group and large group discussions conducted during every class session. I urge you to attend all class sessions and participate fully because: 1) as adult learners, you can learn a great deal from one another about practice and application, 2) exchange and dialog challenge and expand our knowledge and understanding of the readings, and foster critical thinking, and 3) your grade partially depends on the regularity and degree of your participation. ;-) Furthermore, your participation shows your ability to • identify and relate pertinent information and ideas from the reading, • identify and integrate relevant examples from your professional experiences and knowledge, • identify and integrate useful Internet information, • apply critical thinking skills and insights and To maximize your opportunity to learn from one another and to extend your knowledge and understanding of KM beyond the class sessions, you will have access to a BMGT 305 WebTycho classroom. I expect to use the Announcements and Conferences links regularly. Check Announcements at least weekly for reminders, changes, and status reports. Use Conferences for class discussions, to ask questions of common interest, and to download the PowerPoint slides used in every class session. While not mandatory, participation in conference discussions is a way to enhance learning and contribute to your General Participation grade. Also, you can reach fellow students and me via e-mail. When sending me e-mail, please designate the following in the message subject line: B305-[purpose of message]-[your name] For example: B305-[org core values; or corp e-learng]-[Weatherfd] Grades and comments are returned to you individually during class sessions or via e-mail or fax. Course Schedule MODULE 1—Knowledge Management Fundamentals Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management Week 1 (Jan. 29-31) Topics: Introduction and overview Key terms and definitions The knowledge continuum (data, information, knowledge) KM’s emergence and evolution KM benefits Guiding principles for managing knowledge Leadership and KM Assigned Text Readings: Davenport and Prusak, pp. ix-51; Ruggles, pp. 80-81 Assigned Internet Readings: www.km.gov www.gartner.com What are the goals and target audiences of each Website above? What specific kinds of KM information and resources are available in each site? What did you learn about KM that you didn’t know before? Newslinks @ www.kmworld.com/newslinks Subscribe to Newslinks, KM World’s online newsletter. Familiarize yourself with its contents and keep an eye on the technology updates. Specific questions from this newsletter will be assigned for Modules 4 and 5. Collaborate Newsletter @ www.advanstar.com Subscribe to Collaborate Newsletter, a bimonthly newsletter that focuses on key trends and events influencing the e-collaboration and knowledge management marketplaces. Familiarize yourself with the newsletter’s contents. Be sure to look at the case studies. Use this newsletter as a resource throughout the course. It offers quick access to information on many of the topics we’ll discuss throughout the term. MODULE 2—Knowledge Management and Organization Culture Week 2 (Feb. 5-7) Topics: Organization change Trust Organizational learning/learning organization: theory and interventions Assigned Text Readings: Davenport and Prusak, pp. 34-36, 38-39, 153-178; Prewitt, pp. 3-4. Assigned Internet Readings: “Overcoming the ‘Cultural Barriers’ to Sharing Knowledge,” by Richard McDermott and Carla O’Dell @ Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management www.apqc.org/free/articles/dispArticle.cfm?ProductID=661 What was the study’s central finding? Explain the difference between the visible and invisible dimension of an organizational culture and how these dimensions relate to knowledge management. Provide two examples of successful initiatives (one from each dimension) from the article’s case studies. “The Ecology of Leadership,” by Peter M. Senge @ http://www.pfdf.org/leaderbooks/L2L/fall96/senge.html Imagine you have the opportunity to sit down with Peter Senge after reading his article on leadership and organizational learning. What would you ask him that would help you better understand how organizational learning really works on a practical level. INTERNET RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT #1 DUE FEBRUARY 5 Video— February 7, Hornbake Library, Nonprint, 4th Floor, 8:30-10:00 pm Learning in Action: General Electric Week 3 (Feb. 12-14) Topics: Systems thinking Collective learning Managing knowledge overload Assigned Text Readings: “Creating an Informal Learning Organization,” p. 3-5. Assigned Internet Readings: American Society for Training and Development articles on e-learning @ www.learningcircuits.org Pick any article on learning in the Website below. Explain how the ideas in the article could enhance learning in your organization. MODULE 3—Knowledge Workers: New Roles and Responsibilities Week 4 (Feb. 19-21) MIDTERM EXAMINATION—FEBRUARY 19 Assignments below due on February 21 Topics: Historical background Titles, expectations and responsibilities for the Knowledge Economy Emerging titles and roles Assigned Text Readings: Drucker, pp. 79-94; Davenport and Prusak, pp. 107-122; Ruggles, pp. 86-89 Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management “Hot Career—Knowledge Manager” @ www.apqc.org/free/articles/dispArticle.cfm?ProductID=659 What are the three types of jobs well suite to evolve into knowledge manager positions? Assess your skill set and identify an area (or potential area) related to the role of Knowledge Manager. Explore the links offered in the article, plus others available through a search on the topic, to learn more about this emerging career opportunity. Video— February 21, Hornbake Library, Nonprint, 4th Floor, 8:30-10:00 pm Learning in Action: L.L. Bean MODULE 4—Identifying, Creating, Sharing and Measuring Knowledge Week 5 (Feb. 26-28) Topics: High touch KM strategies and practices Enabling knowledge High touch methods (storytelling, benchmarking, knowledge mapping) Assigned Text Readings: Davenport and Prusak, pp. 52-106, 167-169. Assigned Internet Readings: “Key Roles in the Success of Communities of Practice” @ www.apqc.org/free/articles/dispArticle.cfm?ProductID=1380 What are the key roles? How does the role of leader described in the article above relate to Kouzes’ and Posner’s Leadership Challenge model discussed in Module 1? Week 6 (Mar. 5-7) Topics: High tech KM tools of the trade (Internet, e-mail, intranets, videoconferencing, groupware, best practices database, data-mining, enterprise information portals) Measuring KM Assigned Text Readings: Davenport and Prusak, pp.123-153 Assigned Internet Readings: www.kmworld.com/newslinks Identify a KM technology application that could be beneficial to your current work, and explain how and why. “Measuring Intellectual Assets” @ http://www.montague.com/le/le1096.html Name three techniques and briefly explain how they work. Assess each technique in terms of 1) quantitative and 2) qualitative measuring potential. Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management INTERNET RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT #2 DUE MARCH 7 Video— March 7, Hornbake Library, Nonprint, 4th Floor, 8:30-10:00 pm Learning in Action: The Timken Company MODULE 5—KM Today and Tomorrow Week 7 (Mar. 12-14) Topics: Attention management Idea factories/incubators Customer relationship management (CRM) KM and organizational learning of the future (KM and e-learning, learning management systems, just-in-time learning, learning objects) KM and life-long learning From killer applications to killer existence Assigned Text Readings: Drucker, Dyson, Handy, Saffo and Senge: pp. 1-10 Assigned Internet Readings: www.kmworld.com/newslinks Identify a cutting edge KM technology application discussed in Newslinks that could be beneficial to your work in the future. Explain how and why it would benefit you and your organization. What roadblocks to its adoption by your organization do you foresee? FINAL PROJECT DUE MARCH 14 (midnight) Week 8 (Mar. 19) FINAL EXAMINATION—MARCH 19 Course Assignments I recommend that you take advantage of UMUC's Online Writing Center for additional help with written assignments: www.umuc.edu/writingcenter. 1. Internet Research Assignments Objectives: To identify reliable, pertinent, and current information and knowledge about the course topics To practice Internet research evaluation skills You are required to submit two Internet research assignments. Each assignment should take you roughly an hour to an hour and a half to prepare. Bring your assignment to class on the due date. It will be reviewed and critiqued by a fellow student. You will have the opportunity to enhance Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management and hone the assignment before you submit it to me at the end of class. The first assignment will focus on one of the following Module 2 topics (your choice): Organization change Trust Organizational learning/learning organization: theory and interventions The second assignment will focus on one of the following Module 4 topics (your choice): High touch KM strategies and practices High tech KM tools of the trade Measuring KM You are welcome to begin your research by using the links in the Internet sites listed under each module’s reading assignments. Or you may wish to use a search engine, or recommendations from a relevant listserv or fellow student. Most critical is that you use the criteria on the Internet Evaluation Form at the end of this syllabus when searching for, selecting and annotating your Internet site. Remember: these assignments are due by the end of class on the February 5 and March 7. Follow the instructions below: 1. Using the criteria, on the Internet Evaluation Form, identify pertinent pages from an Internet site that includes worthwhile information and/or knowledge on the topic you have selected. 2. Print the pages and staple them together 3. Write the following on the upper right corner of the first page: a) your name, b) course title (BMGT 305), and c) topic (e.g., organization change, high tech KM tools). 4. Highlight text or graphics on the printout pages that satisfy each of the five evaluation criteria, plus any two subcriteria under each criterion. 5. Label and annotate the printout’s highlighted areas by hand, noting the criterion and subcriterion number from the Form. Include comments and questions in your annotations, as appropriate, to reveal your effort to critically assess the site’s value to KM. 6. Bring your annotated Internet site pages to class on the due date. 7. In class, pick a partner to look at your evaluation (annotations) and give you feedback using the Internet Feedback Form at the end of your syllabus. In turn, you will provide feedback to your partner on their Internet Research. Be sure the Feedback Forms for both you and your partner are completed. 8. Fine tune and enhance your assignment based on your discussion with you partner. 9. Submit your final Internet Research assignment and the attending Internet Feedback Form at the end of class on the due date. Grading Criteria and Points—Total of 20 2. 1. Address all five criterion, plus any two subcriteria. (5 points) 2. Show evidence of critical thought and assessment in annotations (10 points) 3. Include at least one suggestion for improving the Internet site. (5 points) Midterm Examination Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management The midterm examination is worth 100 points. Course material (readings, lectures, and discussions) from Modules 1 and 2 will be covered. The exam will include identification, short answer, and essay questions. A brief exam review will be held the week before. 3. Final Project Objectives: To hone and enhance Internet research skills To identify and apply critical thinking skills uniquely suited for a KM environment To gain practical, transferable KM skills useful in the real world You are required to submit a Final Project, designed to build real world KM skills. The Final Project is worth 50 points. Leadership in knowledge-intensive organizations is the underlying theme. This project consists of a job “application portfolio” prepared by you as if you were an applicant for the Chief Knowledge Officer position described under “CKO Wanted!” Your portfolio will include four components: 1) Cover letter (maximum one page) 2) Resume (maximum two pages) 3) Outline of your interview strategy, intended to help you prep for the interview (maximum two pages) 4) List of resources, to include a minimum of six reliable, relevant sources, at least two of which must be a Website that provides germane, well founded, and sound information (maximum one page) Although the Final Project is not a typical research and writing assignment, keep in mind that you may find valuable tips at UMUC's Online Writing Center and Effective Writing Program helpful: http://www.umuc.edu/writingcenter and www.umuc.edu/prog/ugp/ewp/ewp.html. Final Projects will be submitted by midnight on March 14. There will be a class discussion about what you learned about KM and leadership from the Final Project. Acceptable Delivery Format • Rich Text File (be sure formatting preserved) or HTML • Hardy copy via fax 703 777-8615 (include your fax number, if you want the corrected assignment returned) Unacceptable Delivery Format • MS Word • WordPerfect • USPS mail CKO Wanted! PlatinumGold (PG) is a growing pre-IPO financial software company, dedicated to creating cutting-edge, customizable solutions to support e-business and e-government financial services needs. Our products are competitively priced and include expert customer support. PG recognizes the importance of the company’s intellectual capital and need to design, develop and implement enterprise-wide knowledge-transfer to ensure continued growth and a greater market share. While presently a leader in the domestic financial software market, PG will become a global—and more Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management of a virtual—organization within the next year. PG is seeking an qualified, energetic, and experienced leader to fill a new position, Chief Knowledge Officer. This person will lead PG’s knowledge management initiative by • mapping current knowledge assets • identifying knowledge gaps • creating and implementing knowledge-building and codification processes and procedures • serving as a proactive source of critical input to the company’s knowledge creation and use, overseeing and facilitating improved knowledge processes of business development, information technology, sales and customer service, and personnel • redesigning (where necessary), implementing and guiding the company’s information and knowledge infrastructure, such as decentralized libraries and research and development efforts, expanding computer databases, human networks, and other knowledge-oriented resources • negotiating contracts and managing relationships with external vendors and partners (for example, academic institutions or database companies) • measuring the value of knowledge (quantitatively as well as qualitatively) • managing the company’s knowledge managers, establishing professional standards and monitoring their career growth • selling the value of knowledge and convincing all company employees of the critical need to learn from and to share knowledge Qualifications • Advanced degree in business or related field • At least five years of experience in financial services • Knowledge of software development and business processes preferred • Evidence of leadership in a similar work environment Grading Criteria for Final Project Address each of the following in your Final Project—50 total points: 1) Complete four tasks below using clear, logical, cogent, cohesive, well organized, and correct spelling and grammar. Consider your Project to be a concise, yet substantive, polished portfolio. a) Cover letter (maximum one page) b) Resume (maximum two pages) c) Interview strategy outline (maximum two pages) major pluses and minuses of the job major challenges to successful accomplishments between-the-lines insights and perceptions you gleaned from the job ad and why you think these perceptions are valid practice questions you anticipate being asked and a brief note about your planned responses, questions you would ask before and during the interview d) Works Cited or Bibliography (maximum one page) (5 points) 2) Present evidence of ability to Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management a) identify, examine and assess organizational readiness to implement knowledge management strategies and systems, and b) persuade senior executives and employees of your understanding of successful knowledge management strategies and methods. c) exhibit leadership qualities appropriate for PG environment (15 points) 3) Show originality, thoughtful preparation, and strategic reasoning based on knowledge management reading assignments and outside research. (5 points) 4) Include evidence of reading and research on the management responsibilities of CKOs and their leadership role in and importance to managing organizational knowledge. (15 points) 5) Provide research references: a) Research and cite a minimum of six pertinent references in the Works Cited or Bibliography. At least two references must be Web sites that provide germane, wellfounded, and sound information. Use full citation. For example: Stewart, Thomas. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. A Currency Book/Doubleday, New York: 1999. b) Integrate at least one idea, or example of data or information from the bibliography into each task—i.e., cover letter, resume, interview outline—for a mininum of four total references. Use parenthetical citations within the text. For example: As director of information systems for the past five years, I have discovered that my company's success depends on my understanding of the role knowledge plays not just within the "information sector" but also within the entire economy (Stewart, p.10). (10 points) You may be asked to talk briefly about what you learned from researching and writing your Final Project during the March 14 class session. 4. Final Examination The final examination is worth 100 points. Course material (readings, lectures, and discussions) from Modules 3 through 5 readings and lectures will be covered. Key information from Modules 1 and 2 may be included if it is determined that gaps in understanding still exist after the midterm exam. The final exam will include identification, short answer, and essay questions. A brief exam review will be held the week before. 5. General Participation General Participation is worth up to 10 points. Consider this form of participation as “critical thinking at large.” Because I expect you—especially given the course subject—to actively and regularly exchange information with your fellow students and me, you will be awarded up to 10 points for your contributions. There will be many opportunities for participating in class and online: for example, listening to or reading students’ questions; critiquing Internet Research Assignments; commenting on students’ ideas; sharing your KM research experiences; or offering your interpretation of theoretical constructs. Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management Grading Information Points determine grades. There are a total of 300 possible points for course assignments. The point breakdown and total points for each assignment follow: Assignments Internet Research Mid-term Exam Final Project Final Exam General Participation Possible Points 40 100 50 100 10 Percentage of Grade 13% 32% 20% 32% 3% Letter grades (A, B, C, and so forth) for assignments and for the final course grade will be based on a percentage of points awarded: that is, 100% -90% is an “A,” 80% - 89% is a “B,” 70% - 79% is a “C,” 60% - 69% is a “D,” and 59% and less is a “F.” Grades and comments are returned to you individually during class sessions or via e-mail or fax. Late Assignment Policy I frown on late assignments and your grade is lowered when due dates are not taken seriously. Assignment grades may be decreased 10% for every day the assignment is late. This stated, the most important thing is to stay in touch with me. I understand that unanticipated emergencies occur and will be happy to consider due date extensions on a case-by-case basis, when supportable and justified. When granted, extended date approvals must be sought before the assigned due date. Academic Policies Be sure to read UMUC’s Academic Policies described in the WebTycho Syllabus link. Rev. 12/13/01 Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management INTERNET EVALUATION FORM BMGT 305—Knowledge Management The purpose of this form is to provide a research tool (check list) for critically evaluating the quality, accuracy, and currency of Internet sites. Use this form when selecting and annotating Internet sites as required by Internet Research Assignments 1 and 2. Criterion #1—Authority A. Who sponsors the creation and maintenance of the site? B. What’s the purpose of the sponsoring organization? C. Is there a way to verify the legitimacy of the site’s sponsor? (Phone number or address to get more information?) D. Who wrote the specific material you consider useful? Are his/her qualifications clearly stated? Criterion #2—Accuracy A. Are sources for factual information given so they can be verified? B. Is there indication of who is taking responsibility for the accuracy of the information? C. If statistical data is used in graphs, tables, or charts, are they clearly labeled and referenced? D. Are there detectable errors? Criterion #3—Objectivity A. Is the information in the site (or individual pages) provided as a public service? B. What approximate percentage of the site is devoted to advertising and what is its purpose (announce, sell, increase membership)? C. Are there other indications of bias? Criterion #4—Currency A. Do dates appear in the site indicating 1. When the site was created? 2. When specific pages were added to the site? 3. When the site or pages were edited, revised, or updated? B. Are they other indications or signs that material has been updated? C. Is there material (theories, principles, historical facts, etc.) that could be excluded from a currency criterion? D. Are the links “live,” up-to-date, and germane to the subject? Criterion #5—Coverage and Accessibility A. Is the site completed or still under construction? B. Is there evidence or signs of omissions? C. Is the subject covered adequately? D. Are pages and frames printable? This Form was adopted from Evaluating Internet Resources, www.umuc.edu/library/guides/evaluate.html. Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management INTERNET FEEDBACK FORM BMGT 305—Knowledge Management Internet Assignment: #1 F #2 F Name of student submitting annotation:___________________________________________________ Name of student providing feedback:_____________________________________________________ Instructions: 1. Pick a partner. 2. Complete the Form’s blanks above. 3. Examine your partner’s Internet Research Assignment, checking off criteria addressed, identifying missing criteria (five criteria and two subcritieria under each criterion are required), asking for clarification when needed, suggesting constructive revisions and refinements. 4. Allow your partner to consider your suggestions and make revisions. 5. Update Feedback Form’s checklist to reflect your partner’s revisions. 6. Exchange roles and ask your partner to provide feedback on your Internet Research Assignment following steps 2 through 5. 7. Clip your Assignment and Feedback Form together and submit at the end of the class session. Criterion #1—Authority A. B. C. D. Who sponsors the creation and maintenance of the site? What’s the purpose of the sponsoring organization? Is there a way to verify the legitimacy of the site’s sponsor? (Phone number or address to get more information?) Who wrote the specific material you consider useful? Are his/her qualifications clearly stated? Criterion #2—Accuracy A. Are sources for factual information given so they can be verified? B. Is there indication of who is taking responsibility for the accuracy of the information? C. If statistical data is used in graphs, tables, or charts, are they clearly labeled and referenced? D. Are there detectable errors? Criterion #3—Objectivity A. Is the information in the site (or individual pages) provided as a public service? B. What approximate percentage of the site is devoted to advertising and what is its purpose (announce, sell, increase membership)? C. Are there other indications of bias? Criterion #4—Currency A. Do dates appear in the site indicating 1. When the site was created? 2. When specific pages were added to the site? 3. When the site or pages were edited, revised, or updated? Are they other indications or signs that material has been updated? Is there material (theories, principles, historical facts, etc.) that could be excluded from a currency criterion? Are the links “live,” up-to-date, and germane to the subject? B. C. D. Criterion #5—Coverage and Accessibility A. Is the site completed or still under construction? B. Is there evidence or signs of omissions? C. Is the subject covered adequately? D. Are pages and frames printable? This Form was adopted from Evaluating Internet Resources, www.umuc.edu/library/guides/evaluate.html. Claudine Weatherford, Ph.D. Raven Rocks Resources Knowledge Management