NLNAC Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013
advertisement
RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Riverland Community College Associate Degree Nursing Program Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Copyrighted Materials Developed by: Diane Gold MS, RN, APN Nursing Consultant for Health Force Minnesota Sue Field DNP, RN Nursing Consultant for Health Force Minnesota Consultant Lee Ann Gersmeyer MS, RN, Nursing Consultant for Health Force Minnesota 1 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Table of Contents Standard I. Mission and Administrative Capacity ......................................................................................... 3 Standard II. Faculty and Staff ...................................................................................................................... 27 Standard III Students.................................................................................................................................... 40 Standard IV. Curriculum ............................................................................................................................. 54 Standard V. Resources ................................................................................................................................ 70 Standard VI. Outcomes ................................................................................................................................ 78 Revised Systematic Plan for Evaluation Riverland Community College ADN Program 10/2/12 ................. 92 2 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Standard I. Mission and Administrative Capacity Criteria 1.1 The Mission/Philosophy and outcomes of the nursing education unit are congruent with those of the governing orga nization Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The mission/philosophy and outcomes of the nursing education unit are congruent with those of Riverland Community College and MNSCU Documents Mission Statement of MnSCU Mission Statement of College Mission/Philosophy/Outcomes of nursing program Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Quantitative Analysis: Comparison Analysis demonstrates congruency between MnSCU, RCC vision/mission and nursing education unit mission/philosophy and outcomes. Every other year (odd years (2013) Electronic Document/ Location http://www.mnscu.edu/b oard/policy/1a01.html http://www.riverland.edu /administration/missionstatement.cfm ADN Student handbook Plan Paper Document/ Location Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office Files Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office Files Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office Files 3 Last updated Who Responsible 10/2012 Faculty/Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) 10/2012 Faculty/CNO 10/2012 Faculty/CNO Frequency Every two years or with substantive changes Every two years or with substantive changes Every two years or with substantive changes RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Table of Comparison of Above MnSCU/College/Program Administrative Accreditation D2L Site: Assistant for Health https://riverland.ims.mns Sciences Office Files cu.edu/ Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Odd years Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 10/2012 Faculty/CNO Every two years or with substantive changes Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision To be evaluated-(odd years) 2006-2007-ELA met. Major curriculum change to “Pathway” model and to overall program delivery model, mission, vision, philosophy. (see self-study for details) 2008- ELA met. Program review and MBN approval Pathway occurred. MBN report Program Review Email message 8/7/06 references developing curriculum for pathway programs on 8/8/06 meeting. No meeting minutes found. Layout of AD Nursing Pathway on D2L under 2006 meeting minutes. Maintain current evaluation process. Revise as needed with changes. Maintain current evaluation process 2010-ELA met. Plans for curriculum revision to begin. Evaluated during that process 2011- ELA met. Revision : MnSCU- Chancellor’s strategic framework presented Nursing Faculty minutes 11/17/11 Revised- RCCADNP mission/vision to align with new NLN framework (2010) and with RCC and MnSCU mission/vision. 2012- ELA met RCCADNP: Curriculum - NLN framework implementation; MCOs to AASC AASC minutes May of 2012 AASC minutes Completed MCO’s fall of 2012 Maintain current evaluation process. Revaluate if new RCC President revises the Mission/Vision/Values or interim president add diversity statement. 4 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.2 The governing organization and nursing education unit ensure representation of students, faculty, and administrators in ongoing governance activities. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 50% of full time faculty will serve on a college committee yearly (college wide committees, hiring committees, work groups, simulation ) 100% of faculty will serve on a nursing faculty committees of the nursing unit. *(curriculum, admissions/readmission, pinning ceremony, ) The Nurse Administrator will serve on at least 3 college committees. The Nurse Administrator will be represented in the college governance. At least 2 students will serve on the Nursing Advisory committee each year At least one student will attend semester faculty meetings at least 50% of time. Documents Table: Students on nursing committee Electronic Document/ Location Meeting minutes on Accreditation D2L Site https://riverland.ims.mnsc u.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Yearly or as changes occur. (January) Assessment Method Quantitative analysis; comparative analysis with review of attendance from meeting minutes and self-reporting of faculty on college committees Plan Paper Document/ Last updated Location Document Room September 2012 Who Responsible Faculty Frequency What Month Yearly, January or as changes occur Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.mnscu.ed u/ Document Room September 2012 Faculty Table- Faculty participation college/nursing committees. Yearly, January or as changes occur MSCF contract faculty committees http://www.minnesotastatecol legefaculty.org/ (find specific August of 2012 Faculty Yearly, January or as changes occur 5 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Faculty Minutes/Committee Minutes/Governance Minutes (Management Team, Executive Team, Deans/Directors Meetings) link to faculty committees) https://riverland.ims.mnscu.ed u/ Document Room Faculty/CNO Yearly, January or as changes occur Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010-Met- ELA met. Students are attending. ELA Met-50% of full time faculty will serve on a college committee *(college wide committees, hiring committees, work groups, simulation) 100% of full time faculty serve on Nursing Advisory Committee Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Nursing advisory committee meeting. Minutes on D2L Committee report 08-09 5/14/08, 11/18/09, 4/6/10, 11/29/10, 6/29/11, 11/30/11, 10/24/12 Advisory committee minutes posted on D2L and show faculty are part of the committee. 11/11/10 minutes reminder of 11/19/10 Adv mtg Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. Nursing Advisory committee: Students: Wendy Halvorson, Brandon Hamlin Provide additional opportunities for students to attend meetings. Maintain current evaluation process. Encourage faculty to become active in other/additional college committees. Maintain current evaluation process Encourage faculty to become active in other/additional college committees. Maintain current evaluation process. ELA Met- Program Director serves on 4 college committees; Class A, QUILT (Quality improvement Leadership Team, Disaster Sim, RCC alumni committee) ELA Partially met- The Nurse Administrator will be represented in the college governance. Nursing Director is a faculty postion; Nursing is represented by Dean of Health Sciences with input. Class A, QUILT, Disaster Sim, Alumni minutes- College Staff and faculty website Nursing Program Director in a faculty role- not represented in college governance. Evaluate need for change in position. Dean supervising program director provides representation. 2011: ELA Met- Graduated students serving on Nursing Advisory 2011 Advisory comm. Minutes on Maintain current evaluation process. 6 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 committee D2L: 6/29/11 Nursing Forum Communications in document room Current students are attending team and advisory meetings Grads invited: Wendy Halvorson Action- Formation of Student Nursing Forum, faculty advisor appointed. ELA Met- 80% of full time faculty will serve on a college committee *(college wide committees, hiring committees, work groups, simulation) ELA Met- 100% of full time faculty serve on Nursing Advisory Committee ELA Met- Program Director (CNO) serves on college committees; Class-A, QUILT (Quality improvement Leadership Team, Disaster Sim, V-Pass, Retention, Administrative Council, ELA Met- The Nurse Administrator will be represented in the college governance. 2012: ELA Met- Students are serving on Advisory Comm. Faculty meeting Service table created. Sept 2012 2011 Advisory Minutes posted on D2L showing faculty are part of the committee. 6/29/11, 11/30/11. And 10/28/11 minutes shows reminder of 11/30/11 Adv. mtg 2011 Committee Minutes 2011 Committee Minutes Sept 2, 2012 (Faculty Meeting 7 Katie Jacobsen and Schyler Douglas served on the Nursing Advisory Panel this year Maintain current evaluation process for faculty serving on committees. Maintain current evaluation process. Faculty Program Director appointed to Interim Associate Dean, CNO position Oct, 2011. Full time administrative position. Maintain current evaluation process. Sally Garry is serving as student representative to the Nursing RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 10/2/12) Nursing student representatives on Nursing Advisory Committee Student Nurses Forum continues ELA Met- 50% of full time faculty will serve on a college committee *(college wide committees, hiring committees, work groups, simulation) ELA Met- 100% of full time faculty serve on Nursing Advisory Committee ELA Met- Program Director (CNO) serves on college committees; Program Director serves on college committees; Class A, QUILT (now AQIP), Disaster Sim, Retention, Administrative Council (now President’s Cabinet), Academic council, Program Outcome, IDEA Met- The Nurse Administrator will be represented in the college governance. 2012-Advisory minutes 10/24/12 Advisory Summit students Katie Jacobson and Skyler Douglas were invited. Forum Communications Faculty PDP last updated- August 2012. Completed PDP not posted on D2L. Confidential information 2012 RBIAS- Fall meeting- Minutes 10/24/12 2012- Committee sheets, minutes http://www.riverlan d.edu/administratio n/committees.cfm 2012- Committee sheets, minutes 8 Program Faculty meetings. She will attempt to enlist a first level student to join her Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.3 Communities of interest have input into program processes and decision making. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Nursing Advisory Board meets twice a year to review the nursing program and provide input. AC members listed with Minutes Frequency of Assessment Twice a year May/December Assessment Method Quantitative analysis of Advisory Board Minutes/attendance. Plan Documents Last updated Who Responsible Listed on D2L site under advisory committee 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 CNO/Administrative Assistant Document room Listed on D2L site under advisory committee 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 CNO/Administrative Assistant Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document room Listed on D2L site under advisory committee 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 CNO/Administrative Assistant Documentation of minutes of meetings, letters , emails with clinical sites Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document room Link to the MnSCU advisory board http://vfc6.project.mns cu.edu/index.asp?Type Advisory Board: list of members/ bylaws Copy of invitation for Advisory Board Meeting Advisory Board meeting minutes Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Paper Document/ Location Document room Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ CNO/Administrative Assistant CNO 9 Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 handbook =B_BASIC&SEC=%7BB8 651B15-54AF-4BE0BD74CF57CFF0E732%7D Advisory Committee Policies, Definitions and Procedures http://www.mnscu.edu /board/policy/330.html http://www.riverland.e du/policies/dataprivacy-employees.pdf Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA MET- Nursing Advisory Board met twice a year with partners. ELA Met- 100% of meetings-were with partners, students, graduates, and faculty 2011: ELA MET- Nursing Advisory Board met twice a year with partners. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Posted on D2L 2010- minutes April 6, 2010- All College Adv mtg. November 29, 2010 Nursing Advisory Meeting Posted on D2L 2011Minutes- June 29 and November 30, 2011 100% of meetings- were with partners see above. 10 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. 12/14/09 EOS meeting minutes Maintain. Co-chairs elected from MCHS- Austin and Albert Lea. 5/11/10 EOS meeting minutes. Develop partnerships with Winona State University. Invite graduates to attend. Student goal met. Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain. MD invited to committee- accepted. University Partnership with Winona State University established. Graduates invited. Students invited/attended. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2012: ELA Met- Nursing Advisory Board met twice a year with partners. Met- 100% of meetings- were with partners See above Posted on D2L 2012 Minutes- June 28 and Oct 24, 2012 (B&I Advisory Summit) 11 Maintain current evaluation process. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.4 Partnerships exist that promote excellence in nursing education, enhance the profession, and benefit the community. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of Articulation agreements with Baccalaureate Nursing Programs are updated. College offers scholarships to students through the Foundation 100% of clinical contracts are current Frequency of Assessment Yearly or as changes made (February) Assessment Method Quantitative Analysis of Contracts Quantitative Analysis of Articulation Agreements Quantitative Analysis of Service Learning Surveys Quantitative Analysis of Foundation Scholarships. Yearly or as needed (February) Yearly (February) Evidence of Partnership provided. One or more new partnerships will occur yearly. Plan Documents Copy of Foundation Scholarships received by Nursing Students. Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Evidence of new partnerships- Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m Nursing Forum communications /Service Learning information Copy of signed Articulation agreements with BSN programs Paper Document/ Location Document Room Last updated Who Responsible December 2012 Faculty Frequency What Month Yearly February Document Room CNO Yearly February Document Room ; email from Steve Bowren CNO Yearly February CNO Yearly February Document room Spring of 2012; in process; first class in 12 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Descriptions, flyers, grants, etc.. nscu.edu/ session this fall semester Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Not Met- 100% of Articulation agreements with Baccalaureate Nursing Programs are not updated. ELA Met- College offers scholarships to students through the Foundation (see report) NPD minutes from 2010 RCC Articulations managed by Jan Waller/ Holly Sherman. (Dean of Liberal Arts and administrative support) to manage all articulation agreements in the future. MnSCU Nursing Articulation agreement needs to be revised. Minnesota Nursing Program Directors group addressing this. Program director meets with Augsburg, Crown, and WSU to discuss articulations. RCC annual Report Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. Majority of contracts are up to date. Update all contracts- NPD and administrative assistant to work on. ELA: Partially met- Majority of clinical contracts are current Yes Met: One new partnership will occur yearly Disaster sim taskforce and implementation of Disaster sim- news articles. Owatonna Hospital IPEC center 2011: ELA Met- 100% of Articulation agreements with Baccalaureate Nursing Programs are updated Statewide NPD minutes 12/19/11 EOS discussion on WSU. Articulation discussion in program minutes. 13 Maintain current evaluation process. MnSCU Nursing Articulation Agreement updated. WSU BSN Partnership developed. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 11/29/10 Advisory minutes RCC annual report Maintain current evaluation process. ELA Met- College offers scholarships to students through the Foundation. Partially met-100% of clinical contracts are in process of being changed Faculty meeting minutes discussion on 8/25/11. Minutes posted on D2L. Contracts are Contracts are up-todate or in progress. Contract list of clinical sites are posted on D2L New MnSCU Nursing Memorandum of Agreement clinical contract necessary to implement for all existing clinical contracts. Major revisions occurred. MnSCU Legal indicates all types of clinical sites must have contract in place. All clinical contract updates in progress 2012: ELA Met- 100% of Articulation agreements with Baccalaureate Nursing Programs are updated. Directors notes. Met- College offers scholarships to students through the Foundation. RCC annual report Met- 100% of clinical contracts are current. Contracts are up-todate or in progress. Contract list of 14 Maintain current evaluation process. Revise as needed. Work with Cardinal Stritch occurring, exploring on site graduate program, Winona State University on site RN- BSN program begins. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 clinical sites are posted on D2L Met: one or more new partnerships CPL project, partnership with Mayo clinic/Dr. Franz/ veteran services Cardinal –Stritch work PLTW- Bio-med pre nursing 15 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.5 The nursing education unit is administered by a nurse who holds a graduate degree with a major in nursing. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The Nurse Administrator will hold a Master’s degree in Nursing and is currently licensed as an RN in Minnesota.. Documents Credentials (academic and experimental) of nurse administrator (CV) Job Description for Nursing Administrator Frequency of Assessment Verified prior to hire Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Comparative analysis with CV-Director will hold a masters in Nursing Verification that director has a MS in nursing Verification at the MBN of RN licensure Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month HR Document Room HR Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) HR personnel file Maintain current evaluation process. 2011:Met Nurse administrator has a Master’s degree in Nursing and holds RN licensure for MN. HR personnel file Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: Met Nurse administrator has a Master’s degree in Nursing and holds RN licensure for MN. HR personnel file Maintain current evaluation process. 2010: ELA Met: Nurse administrator has a Master’s degree in Nursing and holds RN licensure for MN. 16 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.6 The nurse administrator has authority and responsibility for the development and administration of the program and has adequa te time and resources to fulfill the role responsibilities. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The ADN Director has authority and responsibility for the development of the RCCADNP and has 100% release time. Documents Job description for Nurse Administrator Minutes of administrative meetings Interview with supervisor of nurse administrator Staff support position description Table displaying the major role responsibilities with the percentage of time allocated for each role. Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Yearly (January) Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Job description and organizational chart show authority and responsibility for the development and administration of the nursing program. Last updated Who Responsible In process CNO Frequency What Month January Document room CNO January Document Room CNO January Document room CNO January Implementation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: Met- Position description supports the role of the nurse administrator in developing and administering the program. Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Action Plan: Nurse faculty program director- explore need to make administrative position (see SEP results for 1.2) Other position responsibilities 17 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Not MetThe nurse administrator does not have sufficient time to fulfill the responsibilities of the position. She serves a faculty role in addition to administrative role causing conflicting duties. Met-The nurse administrator has adequate support staff. within description attained. Program director paid additional overtime for FY11 in order to meet job needs. 25 % teaching and 1. 15= 1.4 position. Maintain current evaluation process. Met- Organizational chart and interview with nurse administrator supervisor documents adequate communication and support within other administrative units of the college. . 2011:Met- Position description supports the role of the nurse administrator in developing and administering the program. Partially met-The nurse administrator does not have sufficient time to fulfill the responsibilities of the position. Met- The nurse administrator has adequate support staff. Met-Organizational chart and interview with nurse administrator supervisor documents adequate communication and support within other administrative units of the college. 2012: ELA Met- Position description supports the role of the nurse administrator in developing and administering the program. The nurse administrator has sufficient time to fulfill the responsibilities of the position and adequate support staff. Met- Organizational chart and interview with nurse administrator supervisor documents adequate communication and support within other administrative units of the college. Revised Position changed from faculty role to administrative role. Interim Dean role added in October. Action Plan: Revise- Planned for faculty level program leadership and course coordinators Maintain current evaluation process. Note: increasing demands on support staff have developed related to increased student needs and program and college initiatives. Continue to assess. Full time administrator; Level and Course leader roles in place for both the AD and PN programs. Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain: efficiencies in support staff time gained in FY13 related to changes in registration and other duties 18 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.7 With faculty input, the nurse administrator has authority to prepare and administer the program budget and advocates for equity within the unit and among other units of the governing organization. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Faculty and the Chief Nursing Officer participate in preparation of the nursing budget and identify high priority needs for the nursing program. Documents College Wide Budget for similar program size departments Nursing Budget MnSCU Accounting Site Meeting minutes/emails PBS requests Frequency of Assessment Semesterly and annually for Program Budget or as needed (January) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ https://webproc.mnscu .edu/esession/authenti cation.do Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Assessment Method Comparative analysis with job description/college budget for similar program size departments. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Last updated Who Responsible Spring 2012 CNO Frequency What Month January Spring 2012 CNO January CNO/Faculty January CNO/Faculty January Document Room Document room Spring 2012 Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 19 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2010: Partially met- The nursing director will have authority to prepare and plan an equitable nursing budget. Dean made recommendations about budget with input from Director. Director in faculty role. Budget submission to Dean via email and 1:1 Meetings Email Maintain current evaluation process. Nurse program director submits budget draft to dean. Dean plans and administrates budget. Market tuition implemented without feedback. Course fees for ATI managed by program director. All purchase requests and special expenses approved by Dean. Action Plan: Develop more standardization for identifying high priority needs of the nursing program. Nurse faculty position added PBS requestsFY 11- Perkins funding for Nursing 2011: ELA Met- The CNO will have authority to prepare and plan an equitable nursing budget. Faculty has input into the budget. EmailMeeting minutes Budget at Administrative council. Maintain current evaluation process. Faculty program director role changed to CNO/Associate Dean. Maintain current evaluation process. Emails PBS requestsFY 12- Perkins funding- 2012: ELA Met-The nurse administrator will have authority to prepare and plan an equitable nursing budget. Faculty has input into the budget EmailMeeting minutesBudget processAdmin/Academic Council. EmailsPBS requestsFY 11- Perkins 20 Maintain current evaluation process. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 funding Meeting minutes May 2012 EOS Criteria 1.8 Policies of the nursing education unit are comprehensive, provide for the welfare of faculty and staff, and are consistent with those of the governing organization; differences are justified by the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Nursing policies are 100% congruent with college policies and with the faculty and administrative contracts; differences are clearly communicated and justified. Documents Policies & procedures for governing organization & nursing programs College Wide Faculty Hand Book Nursing Programs Faculty Hand Book Rationale for HIPAA, Criminal Background Checks, Immunizations, Nursing Licensure for Clinical Contracts MnSCU contracts (MSCF, AFSCME, MAPE, etc.). Frequency of Assessment Yearly and as policies change (January) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.mns cu.edu/ http://www.riverland.edu /FacultyHandbook/index.cfm Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Assessment Method Comparative analysis of nursing faculty policy book with MSCF contract and college policies. Differences in policies clearly communicated and justified in the nursing faculty policy book. CNO/faculty Frequency What Month January Document room HR January Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.mns cu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.mns cu.edu/ Document room CNO/faculty January Document room CNO/faculty January http://www.hr.mnscu.ed u/contract_plans/docum Document room 21 Last updated In process Who Responsible MSCF Union RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 ents/mscf0911.pdf http://www.mmb.state. mn.us/doc/comp/contrac t/AFSCME.pdf http://www.mape.org/sit es/default/files/MAPE200 92011contract.pdf Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: Met- Contract reviewed and verified that compliance is being met 2011: ELA Met- Contract reviewed and verified that compliance is being met 2012: Met- Contract reviewed and verified that compliance is being met Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Scheduling tool discussions via email. Documentation with Dean. Scheduling tool discussions via email. Documentation with Dean. Scheduling tool discussions via email. Documentation with Dean. 22 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.9 Records reflect that program complaints and grievances’ receive due process and include evidence of resolution. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of program complaints and grievances are addressed through established policies Documents Compliance/grievance policies and records for nursing programs in Nursing Handbook Faculty Handbook College Handbook Record of Complaints: Frequency of Assessment Yearly and as needed. (January) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ http://www.riverland.e du/FacultyHandbook/index.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/studenthandbook/ Human Resources then turned over to the Dean Assessment Method Review of grievance process in the AD student handbook and the RCC website and update as needed. Ensure that the grievance process is followed with all grievances filed. Qualitative Review of students written concerns and/or course feedback. Quantitative records of students’ complaints. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Last updated Who Responsible Spring 2012 CNO/faculty Document room In Process CNO Document room Yearly HR HR and CNO files As needed HR/CNO Implementation and Evaluation 23 Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met- 100% of complaints addressed following nursing and college processes. 2011: ELA Met- 100% of complaints addressed following nursing and college processes. 2012: ELA Met- 100% of complaints addressed following nursing and college processes. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Complaint log kept in HR. Response required for Academic complaints from dean. Complaint log kept in HR. Academic complaints forwarded to Dean. Complaint information is located in Dean’s confidential files. See program director files. Program director files. Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. College taskforce developed (Nov. 2012) lead by HR and CNO to review and revise college complaint policy and procedure. 24 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 1.10 Distance education, as defined by the nursing education unit, is congruent with the mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Distance education is congruent with the mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. Documents Definition of Distance Learning Campus policy on Distance Learning MnSCU policy on Distance Learning Faculty College Handbook List of on-line education training Technology master plan Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/dl/ http://www.riverland.e du/dl/ www.mnscu.edu/board /policy/326.html http://www.riverland.e du/FacultyHandbook/index.cfm RCC and MnSCU site Academics http://www.riverland.e du/administration/Mast er-Technology-Plan.pdf Frequency of Assessment Yearly or as needed. (January) Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Assessment Method Comparative Analysis of mission of college and mission/philosophy of nursing education for distance education. Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month College/CNO/Faculty Document room College Document room MnSCU Document room HR College Document room TRT Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain. Use of ECHO desktop software begins. Alleviates challenges with Camtasia and Captivate software and students. Nursing office suite computers added. 2010: ELA Met- Distance education is congruent with the mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. 25 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2011:ELA Met- Distance education is congruent with the mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. 2012: ELA Met- Distance education is congruent with the mission of the governing organization and the mission/philosophy of the nursing education unit. Mission/Vision review discussed in 11/17/11 department meeting minutes posted on D2L Emails sent from OIT to faculty. December EOS Agenda 26 Maintain. ECHO classroom system installed in B104. Faculty laptop updates. Maintain. ECHO B104 upgraded to live stream. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Standard II. Faculty and Staff Criteria 2.1 AD: Fulltime faculty is credentialed with a minimum of a master’s degree with a major in nursing and maintain expertise in their areas of responsibility. Criteria 2.1.1 AD: The majority of part time faculty are credentialed with a minimum of a master’s degree with a major in nursing; the remaining parttime faculty hold a minimum of a BSN degree with a major in nursing. Criteria 2.1.2 Rationale is provided for utilization of faculty who do not meet the minimum credential Expected Level of Achievement AD: 100% of full time faculty hold a master’s degree with a major in nursing and are currently licensed in the state of MN. AD: 50% of part time faculty hold a master’s degree with a major in nursing; the remaining part-time faculty holds a BSN degree with a major in nursing and are currently licensed in the state of MN. Documents Table: Faculty profile Faculty job descriptions Faculty curriculum vitae (CV) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Human Resources of College Job Postings can be viewed on the MNSCU website when open position is posted Accreditation D2L Site https://riverland.ims.m Assessment Frequency of Assessment At time of hire, annually, and upon license renewal. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Analysis: Collect transcripts at time of hire, confirm licensure and renewal. Last updated Who Responsible Oct. 2012 faculty Human Resources of College Time of hire or any change in Job Position Personnel files in Human Resources At Hire Spring 2012 and 27 CNO/MSCF Contract/ HR Individual Faculty Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Current and Official Transcripts nscu.edu/ and/or in file in Nursing Administration Office Human Resources Human Resources Office as needed At time of hire and as needed when additions are applicable Human Resources of College and Individual Faculty Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met- 100% of FT faculty hold a masters in nursing and are currently licensed in MN. ELA Met: 50% PT faculty hold a master in Nursing and the remaining PT faculty hold a BSN with a major in nursing and are currently licensed in MN Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 9/13/2010 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. Continue to network to recruit qualified faculty Maintain current process for licensure verification 2011: ELA Met- same data as above 11/6/2011 Maintain current evaluation process. Continue to network to recruit qualified faculty Maintain current process for licensure verification 2012: E L A Met- 80% of PT hold a master’s degree 10/30/2012 Maintain current evaluation process. Continue to network to recruit qualified faculty Maintain current process for licensure verification 28 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 2.2 Faculty full and part-time, credentials meet governing organization and state requirements. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Faculty credentials meet the College and Minnesota Board of Nursing requirements. Frequency of Assessment At hire to ensure compliance with college and MBON standards and upon change in education status Assessment Method Quantitative analysis of MnSCU and college policies for faculty credentialing and Board of Nursing. Review of transcripts and Nurse administrator records for RN licensing. For those achieving credentialing: Analysis of plan for educational degree completion Review of CV and transcripts by HR and DON Documents MnSCU credentialing requirements MBN Link Faculty Contract Electronic Document/ Location AD: http://www.cfc.mnscu. edu/fields/Code/creden tials.php?action=view& cid=186 Plan Paper Document/ Location Human Resources of College Last updated At time of hire and with performance reviews Who Responsible Frequency What Month Human Resources http://www.state.mn.u s/portal/mn/jsp/home. do?agency=NursingBoa rd Document Room The MBN updates this information MBN http://www.minnesotas tatecollegefaculty.org/ MSCF Co-Chairs Contract renewal years MSCF Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes 29 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 (date) Maintain current evaluation process. 2010: ELA Met- upon hire 2011: ELA Met- upon hire Maintain current evaluation process. Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: E L A Met- upon hire Criteria 2.3 Credentials of practice laboratory personnel are commensurate with their level of responsibilities. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Credentials of practice laboratory personnel are commensurate with their level of responsibilities. Documents Lab assistant job description Lab assistant CV Electronic Document/ Location Human Resources of College Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Comparative analysis with job description At time of hire and during performance reviews. Plan Paper Document/ Location Personnel File in Nursing Administration Office Document room Document room Last updated Who Responsible At time of hire and Licensure renewal CNO and Human Resources of College Spring 2012 Lab assistant Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Maintain current evaluation process. .Job description changed to lab specialist Maintain current evaluation process. Full time and shared with RTD 2010: ELA met- Meeting expectations for lab duties. 2011: ELA Met- Meeting expectations for lab duties. 2012: ELA Met- Meeting expectations for lab duties. Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Spring 2012 Maintain current evaluation process 30 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 2.4 The number and utilization of faculty (full and part-time) ensure that program outcomes are achieved. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The number and utilization of faculty ensure that the program outcomes are achieved. Frequency of Assessment Semesterly (May/December) Nursing faculty overload assignments are minimal and justified. Semesterly (May/December) Documents Table: Faculty time: Theory time 1:1 Clinical 1:2 or 1:3 Campus lab 1:2 MSCF Contract link Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ http://www.minnesotas tatecollegefaculty.org/ Survey results from students Program outcome achievement measures Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Document Room MSCF Co-Chairs Document Room Assessment Method Quantitative Analysis: Faculty assignments are adequate for student enrollment. Survey results from students indicate an agree/strongly agree on likert scale demonstrating adequate faculty support in classes/clinicals. Annual review of overload assignments; comparison of last 3 years of yearly faculty assignments Last updated Who Responsible Every Semester CNO Contract renewal Every Semester MSCF contract review procedures MSCF staff (Faculty) Document Room Frequency What Month Semesterly faculty Per contract review cycle Semesterly faculty Semesterly Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 ELA met- Overload credits: 16.83 credits; One faculty on leave; faculty requested overload. Course evaluations done each semester; results indicate Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 5/11/2010; 9/13/2010; 2/12/2010 31 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current evaluation process. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 that faculty support student learning 12/14/2010 3/24/2011; 10/7/2011 2011: ELA Met- Overload credits: 21.38 credits: one faculty on sabbatical; faculty participating in additional projects. Course evaluations done each semester; Course evaluations done each semester; results indicate 2012: ELA Met- Faculty evaluation schedule current; Overload credits calculated in January by CNO. Current end of semester (December of 2012) evaluations specifically ask about instructor’s support of student learning. Criteria 2.5 Email Increased utilization of use PT. faculty; Changed how we utilized faculty in the clinical setting. Ratio changed from 1:10 in clinical setting to 1:8 in clinical setting. Attempted to hire two new faculty; failed search. Job offered, but salary disparities. One new full time person hired to start January 2013. Faculty (full and part time) performance reflects scholarship and evidence based teaching and clinical practices. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of faculty will demonstrate scholarship activities as evidenced by their annual professional development plans. Documents Define scholarship Table: Faculty scholarship Electronic Document/ Location http://www.nln.org/fac ultyprograms/pdf/corec ompetencies.pdf Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Evaluate yearly (February) See Narrative for Standard 2.5 Quantitative Analysis of use of current scholarship activities/professional development plan. Self-reporting of scholarly activities Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room 5/2012 Faculty Yearly Document Room 5/2012 Faculty Yearly 32 Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document Room 5/2012 Faculty Yearly Document Room Every three years and last updated as needed Faculty Faculty professional development plans as required by MnSCU Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Every three years and last updated as needed https://staff.riverland.e du/humanresources/for ms.cfm Human Resources Document Room Per faculty Submissions CNO and HR Grants/ Faculty Development Funds/Sabbatical Plans Faculty CV including CEU’s Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Self report Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: E L A M e t - Course improvement plans mandated by college administration as part of the AQIP All faculty completed AQIP assignments; faculty maintain licensure requirements, current CV and required CEUs Ellen, Stacey, Roschelle went to Chicago to the NLNAC Conference Self report Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: ELA Met - All faculty completed AQIP assignments; faculty maintain licensure requirements, current CV and required CEUs Self report Action Plan: Redefined definition of scholarship—see 2.5 narrative. All faculty reviewed and last updated Professional Development Plans. 2010: ELA met- maintain scholarly activity by Course improvement plans mandated by college administration as part of the AQIP All faculty completed AQIP assignments; faculty maintain licensure requirements, current CV and required CEUs Jill and Pat went to Annaheim NLNAC Conference 33 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 2.6 The number, utilization and credentials of non-nurse faculty and staff are sufficient to achieve the program goals and outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Non Nursing staff is sufficient to achieve goals and outcomes for program. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Table for non-nurse faculty (Information Technology, secretary, work study, etc.) Job description Work Study, administrative support Frequency of Assessment Semester (May/December) Assessment Method Comparative analysis with position description Quantitative analysis of evaluation of non-nursing staff. Survey for satisfaction with non-nursing staff time and duties Plan Paper Document/ Location HR Personnel Files As per contract CNO/HR HR Personnel Files As per contract CNO/ HR Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Met- Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: ELA Met- Work study student in lab Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: ELA Met- Maintain current evaluation process. 34 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 2.7 Faculty (full and part-time) are oriented and mentored in their areas of responsibilities. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100 % of new full/part time faculty participate in a formal orientation process. New faculty are provided with an on-going nursing as needed. Documents New faculty orientation checklist Frequency of Assessment Semester to semester (May/December) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Assessment Method Analysis of input from mentor, from clinical site evaluations, and student evaluations shared with new faculty member. Quality Improvement plan developed/last updated by new faculty member on a per semester basis. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Fall of 2012 CNO/ faculty Frequency What Month (May/December) Last updated Who Responsible New faculty orientation manual Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document Room Fall of 2012 CNO/ faculty (May/December) Faculty Handbook http://www.riverland.e du/FacultyHandbook/index.cfm Document Room Fall 2012 CNO/ faculty (May/December) College-wide and nursing program mentoring information Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Fall 2012 CNO/ faculty mentor (May/December) Faculty development professional days https://staff.riverland.e du/humanresources/for ms.cfm Planned per academic calendar Faculty/ college Annually Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes 35 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 (date) 2010: ELA Met- One new hire FT a nursing faculty member acted as mentor Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: ELA Met- Identified need for last updated nursing faculty handbook and orientation materials; old materials outdated 2012: ELA Met- One new hire; college revised the overall Maintain current evaluation process. Develop a handbook with current materials. orientation process and manual. Nursing faculty designated as mentor. Criteria 2.8 May 22, 2012; emails Maintain current evaluation process. Nursing Faculty Handbook and orientation check-list materials in process. Systematic assessment of faculty (full and part time) performance demonstrates competencies that are consistent with program goals and outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of faculty evaluated according to college/MNSCU policy; Frequency of Assessment Yearly (March) 80% of course evaluations by students indicate that faculty support student learning. Documents Faculty evaluation summaries for clinical and classroom with quality improvement plans. MnSCU policy for faculty evaluations Faculty files in HR; Faculty evaluation summaries by Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/FacultyHandbook/index.cfm https://staff.riverland.e du/humanresources/in dex.cfm (trakstar) Assessment Method Qualitative based on faculty evaluations (Yearly Professional Development Plans) on file Quantitative/Qualitative Analysis based on student/clinical staff surveys if applicable Plan Paper Document/ Location Personnel File Human Resources of College Document Room Human Resources of College 36 Last updated Who Responsible Every three years (Fall 2012) CNO Frequency What Month Dependent on hire By MNSCU Systems Office MNSCU Systems Office Reviewed yearly CNO Administrative Assistant RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Personnel Files Administrator and students assists with student evaluation process Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Met- Faculty are evaluated according to contract Course evaluations done each semester Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: ELA Met- Faculty evaluation schedule current Course evaluations done each semester Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: ELA Met - Current end of semester (December of 2012) evaluations specifically ask about instructor’s support of student learning. Faculty are evaluated according to contract; course evaluations done each semester. 9/4/2012 Faculty Minutes Maintain current evaluation process. 2013: ELA Met – Faculty evaluation schedule current; evaluations done according to contract. Spring semester course evaluations have been completed and faculty are reviewing. 5/16/2013 EOS meeting minutes Maintain current evaluation process. Criteria 2.9 Non-nurse faculty and staff performance is regularly reviewed in accordance with the policies of the governing organization. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Staff will meet expectations of the position description to support nursing faculty. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Frequency of Assessment On a yearly basis (March) Plan Paper Document/ Location 37 Assessment Method Quantitative Analysis: annual evaluations against job description. Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month Non-nurse faculty & staff evaluation summaries RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 https://staff.riverland.e Personnel file in Yearly review CNO/ position du/humanresources/in Nursing Administration supervisor Office dex.cfm MnSCU policy for non-nurse https://staff.riverland.e Human Resources of 38 Yearly CNO/ position RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 faculty & staff evaluations du/humanresources/in dex.cfm College receives from System Office supervisor Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: No non-nurse faculty. Staff meets expectations to support nursing faculty Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: No non-nurse faculty. Staff meets expectations to support nursing faculty Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: No non-nurse faculty. Staff meets expectations to support nursing faculty Maintain current evaluation process. 2013: No non-nurse faculty. Staff meets expectations to support nursing faculty Maintain current evaluation process. Criteria 2.10 Faculty full and part-time, engage in ongoing development and receive support in distance education modalities including instructional methods and evaluation. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of faculty teaching online participate in activities or support that enhance the development and improvement of online instruction modalities. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Frequency of Assessment Yearly at evaluation (March) Plan Paper Document/ Location 39 Assessment Method Faculty CV’s; faculty professional development plans; faculty grants Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month Faculty CV RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Fall of 2012 faculty Accreditation D2L Site: Personnel file in Nursing Administration https://riverland.ims.m Office nscu.edu/ 40 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Faculty professional development Plan https://staff.riverland.e du/humanresources/in dex.cfm Personnel file in Nursing Administration Office At time of review per MNSCU policy Faculty/CNO Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Met- faculty participate in faculty duty days; options for OIT presentations, ongoing individual support for technological skill development; Health Educator’s conference—options provided for faculty to attend. $500 minimum of faculty development funds every year through Faculty Development funds. Maintain current evaluation process. 2011: ELA Met- faculty participate in faculty duty days; options for OIT presentations, ongoing individual support for technological skill development; Health Educator’s conference—options provided for faculty to attend. $500 minimum of faculty development funds every year through Faculty Development funds. Maintain current evaluation process. 2012: ELA Met- faculty participate in faculty duty days; options for OIT presentations, ongoing individual support for technological skill development; Health Educator’s conference—options provided for faculty to attend. $500 minimum of faculty development funds every year through Faculty Development funds. Maintain current evaluation process. 2013: ELA Met- faculty participate in faculty duty days; options for OIT presentations, ongoing individual support for technological skill development; Health Educator’s conference—options provided for faculty to attend. $500 minimum of faculty development funds every year through Faculty Development funds. Faculty updated individual Professional Development Plans at faculty duty day 5/20/2013 and attended OIT Training day for faculty on 5/21/2013. Maintain current evaluation process. 41 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Standard III. Students Criteria 3.1 Student policies of the nursing education unit are congruent with those of the governing organization, publicly accessible, n ondiscriminatory, and consistently applied; differences are justified by the goals and outcomes of the nursing education unit. Assessment 1. 2. 3. Expected Level of Achievement Student policies of the nursing program are congruent with the college and MnSCU policies. Differences are justifiable. RCC student policies/procedures are accessible on the college web site. 100% of nursing students will have access to the Associate Degree Nursing Program Student Handbook, which is available on D2L in all nursing courses and is reviewed with students during the first class of the Fall semester. Documents Nursing Student Handbook: including rationales for differences: Dress code, HIPPA, progression/readmit, grading, clinical, liability insurance, etc. College Student Handbook Partnerships/Clinical Contracts Nursing Website with Student Handbook online Frequency of Assessment 1. EOY November or as policies change 2. Each fall or as student handbook is updated 3. Semesterly as class is uploaded to D2L Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/index.cfm 1. 2. 3. Plan Paper Document/ Location Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office files Assessment Method Chief nursing officer and faculty will conduct a comparative analysis of college and student policies to ensure congruence and provide documented rationale for differences between MnSCU, RCC, and the nursing program. Analysis of website for current student handbook each fall or as handbook updated. A signed affidavit of reading and understanding the student nurse program handbook is kept in all individual student files. Analysis of D2L sites each fall and the Student Handbook being available in each nursing course. Last updated Who Responsible 08/2012 Faculty/CNO Frequency What Month August http://www.riverland.e du/studenthandbook/ N/A 08/2012 Faculty/CNO August Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/index.cfm Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office files ongoing Faculty/CNO August/ongoing N/A 11/2012 Faculty/CNO August Implementation and Evaluation 42 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met- Data analysis indicates congruence between nursing program student policies and RCC and MnSCU. RCC student policies are available electronically on college web site. Nursing program student handbooks were reviewed on first day of class (August 27, 2010) and program policies/procedures that differ from the college were explained. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) August 2010 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current process for monitoring Maintain review of nursing program student handbook on first day of class. D2L courses evaluated each year for student handbook availability 2011: ELA Met- Data analysis indicates congruence between nursing program student policies and RCC and MnSCU. RCC student policies are available electronically on college web site. Nursing program student handbooks were reviewed on first day of class (August 26, 2011) and program policies/procedures that differ from the college were explained. August 2011 Maintain current process for monitoring Maintain review of nursing program student handbook on first day of class. 2012: E L A M e t - Data analysis indicates congruence between nursing program student policies and RCC and MnSCU. RCC student policies are available electronically on college web site. Nursing program student handbooks were reviewed on first day of class (September 1, 2012) and program policies/procedures that differ from the college were explained. 100% of student affidavits are in personal student files. September 2012 Maintain current process for monitoring Maintain review of nursing program student handbook on first day of class and process of signed affidavits. 43 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 3.2 Student services are commensurate with the needs of students pursuing or completing the practical program/associate program, including those receiving instruction using alternative methods of delivery. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Frequency of Assessment A minimum of 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with accessibility and suitability of the college student services. Documents List of available student services Table of student services personnel & areas of responsibility (i.e. support services, counseling, library, D2L, technology, financial aid, child care, GPS, Writing center, Student Success Center – tutoring, disability services, security, etc) Data on student satisfaction of services evaluation/exit survey College survey of student satisfaction of student services (CCSSE) Annually in April Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/studentservices/ind ex.cfm Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu Assessment Method Chief nursing officer and faculty will perform a quantitative analysis on the Exit Survey data related to student satisfaction with college student services. Plan Paper Document/ Location N/A Last updated Who Responsible 11/2012 CNO/Faculty Frequency What Month April Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office files 11/2012 CNO/Faculty April Document room 11/2012 CNO/Faculty April Document room 11/2012 Student Services April Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: E L A M e t - College generated Graduate Exit Survey: Satisfaction with Student Service areas Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 11/2012 44 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current level of satisfaction: Further development necessary to get better returns on surveys. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied/Not Applicable 1 (20%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%) 2011: E L A N o t M e t - Data was not gathered by the college this year; nursing faculty did not realize that until too late. 2012: ELA Met- Faculty discovered this topic was not being Feb. 16, 2012 addressed in all course evaluations, so a standard course evaluation template was developed and implemented in all courses. New graduate surveys were updated, sent to students and awaiting results. Course Evaluation (NURS 2020): How satisfied are you with the access to Student Services? Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied 22 (51.16%) 11 (25.58%) 9 (20.93%) Program Development: Identified that college surveys did not meet accreditation needs. No data collected by the college. Nursing faculty developed and piloted brief course specific surveys to collect this data from nursing students. Action Plan: Revised NP generated course specific, exit and graduate and course follow-up surveys to include specific questions pertaining to student satisfaction with student services. From this point forward, we will not use the neutral scale. Course Evaluation (NURS 2010): Student services are easy to access and met my needs. Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 8 (13.79%) 30 (51.72%) 16 (27.59%) 2013: ELA met – Faculty implemented a standard course evaluation with questions regarding each of the standards. Plan – continue using standard course evaluation questions regarding all 6 standards in all nursing courses. Course Evaluation (NURS 2040): How satisfied are you with the access to Student Services? Agree Strongly Agree 37 (54.41%) 17(25%) 45 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 46 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 3.3 Student educational and financial records are in compliance with the policies of the governing organization and state and federal guidelines. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 100% of procedures for maintenance of educational and financial policies are followed. Nursing transcripts are kept for 50 years. Documents Student financial records Electronic Document/ Location www.riverland.edu/poli cies/Financial-AidPolicy-and-ProcedureManual.pdf Frequency of Assessment Annual review with Financial Aid Director and Registrar in October to MBN Annual Report and NLNAC Surveys Plan Paper Document/ Location N/A Assessment Method Financial aid director will review all financial aid audits and compare to policies and report results to chief nursing officer. Registrar will report compliance with college, state, and federal guidelines with all student educational records. Last updated Who Responsible 11/2012 Financial Aid Department/ CNO Frequency What Month October Student educational records www.riverland.edu/poli cies/FERPA.cfm College Student Handbook 11/2012 Enrollment Services/Registrar/CNO October Policies & procedures related to educational & financial records www.riverland.edu/poli cies/Financial-AidPolicy-and-ProcedureManual.pdf Financial Aid Office 11/2012 Financial Aid Department/CNO October Copy of audit for financial aid Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Financial Aid office 10/2012 Financial Aid Department October Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met- Educational records and financial aid audits indicate compliance with state and federal requirements. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Reviewed as necessary 47 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain compliance. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2011: ELA Met- Educational and financial aid audits indicate compliance with state and federal requirements. Reviewed as necessary Maintain compliance. 2012: E L A M e t - Educational and financial aid audits indicate compliance with state and federal requirements Reviewed as necessary Maintain compliance. Criteria 3.4 Compliance with the Higher Education Reauthorization Act title IV eligibility and certification requirements is maintained Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 1. The financial aid department and director will maintain compliance with the Higher Education Reauthorization Act Title IV. 3.4.1 The student handbook, college web site, and financial aid office correspondence will provide detailed information regarding Federal District Student loans to students. 100% of students will receive financial aid policies from the financial aid department. Written plan provides information about students’ responsibilities in relation to student loan repayment. 3.4.2 The Financial Aid department will inform all students (100%) of ethical responsibilities regarding financial assistance at RCC Less than 16% of students will be in default Frequency of Assessment Annual verification with financial aid director in October. Assessment Method Financial aid director will review financial aid audits and reports results via email to the chief nursing officer. Financial aid staff will review financial aid documents (loan information, counseling, monitoring, and Federal Loan Program information) and report to the chief nursing officer. Financial aid staff will establish the inclusion of students’ ethical responsibility regarding financial assistance by reviewing the following sources: college web site, RCC student handbook, Department of Education web site, and ongoing correspondence with the financial aid office. Findings will be reported to the chief nursing officer via President’s Council Meeting Minutes. Plan 48 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Documents Electronic Document/ Location www.riverland.edu/fa/c ode-of-conduct.cfm Paper Document/ Location Financial Aid office Last updated Who Responsible 10/2012 Documents for compliance with FERPA www.riverland.edu/poli cies/FERPA.cfm Registrar’s office 11/2012 Documents for compliance with ADA www.riverland.edu/Fac ulty-Handbook/ada.cfm Financial Aid office 11/2012 Financial Aid Department Chief Nursing officer Enrollment Services/Registrar Chief Nursing Officer Financial Aid Department 3.4.1 Loan repayment program information checklist (info, counseling, monitoring, etc) www.riverland.edu/fa/r efund-policy.cfm Financial Aid office 11/2012 Financial Aid Department October Financial Aid office 11/2012 October Financial Aid office 11/2012 Financial Aid Department Financial Aid Department Documents for compliance with Title IV 3.4.2 Student brochure regarding student ethical role of loan repayment Analysis of Default Rate Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency What Month October October October October Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: E L A M e t - Financial aid director reports 100% compliance. Director also reports policies are consistently last updated. 2011: E L A M e t - Financial aid director reports 100% compliance. Director also reports policies are consistently last updated. 2012: E L A M e t - Financial aid director reports 100% Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Review as necessary Maintain compliance. Review as necessary Maintain compliance. Review as necessary Maintain compliance. compliance. Director also reports policies are consistently last updated. 49 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 3.5 Integrity and consistency exist for all information intended to inform the public, including the program’s accreditation stat us and NLNAC contact information. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement All nursing program materials (printed and online information) intended for the public is available, accessible, accurate, and consistent. The public, college, and all students are informed of the current accreditation status and NLNAC contact information. Documents Web site Nursing program brochures/handbooks Course catalog Newspaper announcements of accreditation status Frequency of Assessment Annually in April Ongoing with any status change with NLNAC accreditation Plan Paper Document/ Location N/A Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/index.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/index.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/academics/courselist.cfm Assessment Method A Comparative analysis of website/nursing handbook/brochures information, along with accreditation contact information and accreditation status will be done by the chief nursing officer and faculty. Administrative Assistant for Health Sciences Office files N/A Not yet available Not yet available Last updated Who Responsible 11/2012 CNO/Faculty Frequency What Month April 11/2012 CNO/Faculty April 10/2012 CNO April Coming up in January 2013 CNO April Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain communication with all communities of interest. Update nursing program materials (printed and online) as needed and annually. Maintain communication with all communities of interest. Update nursing program materials (printed and online) as needed 2010: ELA Met- NLNAC Accreditation information is present on the nursing program web site. 2011: E L A M e t - NLNAC Accreditation information is present on the nursing program web site. 50 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2012: E L A M e t - Information about the upcoming NLNAC visit was shared at the Riverland Business Summit meeting Allied Health break-out session October 24, 2012. An Allied Health update was emailed to all Riverland employees on October 16, 2012 that included the upcoming visit reminder. Information will be printed in the local newspapers as the visit gets closer. NLNAC Accreditation information is present on the nursing program web site. 2013: ELA met: Nursing progam web site reviewed at faculty duty day on May 20, 2013. Needed revisions/additions for site were identified. NLNAC Accreditation information is present on the nursing program web site. 11/6/2012 5/20/2013 Faculty duty day 51 and annually. Maintain communication with all communities of interest. Update nursing program materials (printed and online) as needed and annually. Maintain communication with all communities of interest. Update nursing program materials (printed and online) as needed and annually. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 3.6 Changes in policies, procedures, and program information are clearly and consistently communicated to students in a timely ma nner. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Any changes in policies, procedures, and program information are clearly and consistently communicated within 2 weeks of change. Frequency of Assessment Quarterly update website and as needed. (May/Dec) A minimum of 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with communication of policies, procedures, and program information. Documents Email communications regarding policy changes (meeting minutes to support) Nursing Student Handbook with date of last update Website updates Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ D2L course home pages http://www.riverland,e du/nurs/index.cfm http://www.riverland,e du/nurs/index.cfm Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Assessment Method A Quantitative Analysis of website updates/policy, procedure updates in student handbook will be done by the nursing program director and faculty. Survey of student knowledge of how policy changes are communicated completed through course evaluations. Last updated Who Responsible ongoing CNO/Faculty Frequency What Month As needed Document room 8/2012 CNO/Faculty December/May N/A 11/2012 CNO As needed Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 2010: E L A M e t - Changes in policies/procedures are posted and communicated to students according to established protocols, emails, home page, and in discussion boards and face to face 52 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current processes 2011: E L A M e t - Changes in policies/procedures are posted and communicated to students according to established protocols, emails, home page, and in discussion boards and face to face RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Policy was an Process developed: One mode of communication with students. D2L outgrowth of a 2010 Homepage is Official Notice; Instructors will date and time and initial student issue; all communications posted to students. Communicated via email to all discussed faculty. confidentially between student, HR and CNO 2012: E L A M e t - Changes in policies/procedures are posted and communicated to students according to established protocol (using D2L home pages in each course). Criteria 3.7 November 20, 2012 Maintain current processes Action Plan: Developed questions on the end of semester course evaluation surveys to include student feedback on satisfaction levels with communication about program and policy information/changes. Data collected and in process of being analyzed Orientation to technology is provided and technological support is available to students, including those receiving instruction using alternative methods of delivery. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement A minimum of 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with access to orientation and support for instructional technology use (D2L, Echo, etc) Documents D2L orientation Clinical/Lab orientation to computer usage and Bedside medication verification; pumps, Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/rvrblog/post.cfm/d2 l-laptop-orientation2012-fall-schedule Owatonna link to computer orientation at time of visit Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Semesterly in Chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze Student Satisfaction Exit May/December Survey data and course specific surveys. Plan Paper Document/ Location N/A Student orientation document to charting MCHS-AL and Austin 53 Last updated Who Responsible Faculty Frequency What Month May Faculty May RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 and other technology. Library orientation Nursing Website http://www.riverland.e du/library/orientation.c fm N/A Faculty May http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/index.cfm N/A Faculty May Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: E L A P a r t i a l l y M e t - Graduate Exit Survey: Satisfaction with Student Service areas Very Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied/Not Applicable 1 (20%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%) 2011: E L A N o t M e t - Data was not gathered by the college this year; nursing faculty did not realize that until too late. 2012: ELA Met- Faculty discovered this topic was not being Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) November 2012 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain student satisfaction levels. Survey questions not specific to instructional technology. No data collected by the college. Nursing faculty will have to develop a method to collect this data from nursing students. May 2012 addressed in all course evaluations, so a standard course evaluation template was developed and implemented in all courses for Fall 2012. Course Evaluation (NURS 2020 and NURS 2010): See course evaluation data for under 3.2 54 Will continue to collect data from the NURS 2010 course evaluation to be done at the end of the semester. Continue including this question in the course evaluations, but look at specifying the exact sources of student services. Discuss including a question in the survey about how these services could be improved. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 3.8 Information related to technology requirements and policies specific to distance education is clear, accurate, consistent, and accessible. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Information regarding instructional technology is provided, accurate, consistent, and accessible for all nursing students. A minimum of 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with availability of technological support and assistance on the Student Satisfaction Exit Survey Documents Frequency of Assessment Annually in April Assessment Method A quantitative analysis of college web site resources and policies will be done by the chief nursing officer and faculty. Chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data. Plan Paper Document/ Location N/A D2L Orientation Electronic Document/ Location http://www.riverland.e du/rvrblog/post.cfm/d2 l-laptop-orientation2012-fall-schedule Last updated Who Responsible Website Resources with requirements for technology http://www.riverland.e du/dl/hardwarerequirements.cfm N/A Office of Instructional Technology April Student Handbook http://www.riverland.e du/studenthandbook/ N/A Academic Affairs April Office of Instructional Technology Frequency What Month April Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) No changes were made regarding this data. 2010: ELA Partially Met- NURS 2040 Course Evaluation: Access to technical support was adequate Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 73.33% Agree or Strongly agree 55 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 No data collected by the college. Nursing faculty will have to develop course evaluations, exit and 6 month follow-up surveys to gather this information . 2011: E L A N o t M e t - No data was collected by the college or faculty; nursing faculty did not realize that until too late. 2012: ELA Partially Met- OIT College-wide survey done in spring: Rate the technoolgy used in the following Riverland learning environments: Excellent Good Average On-ground classroom 24.4% (55) 44% (99) 16.9% (38) Computer lab 22% (49) 44.4% (99) 16.1% (36) Career Technical Lab/Shop 12.1% (27) 25.1% (56) 10.3% (23) (50.2% said does not apply) ITV Classroom 11.0% (24) 24.7% (54) 12.8% (28) (46.6% said does not apply) Neutral Agree Strongly agree 9 (15.52%) 30 (51.72%) 6 (10.34%) December 2012 Action Plan: faculty have implemented these questions in the NP generated course evaluations, Exit and Graduate surveys. Data collected; in process of being evaluated. NURS 2010 Course Evaluation: Technology Support was readily available The college-wide survey done in the spring does not separate out nursing student feedback. when I had questions and problems 56 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Action Plan : faculty will continue to use standardized course evaluation 2013: ELA met – NURS 2040 Course evaluation Spring semester: questions related to Standards 1-6 on all nursing course evaluations. Technology Agree Strongly Agree Support was readily available when I had 40 (59.97%) 11 (16.42%) Information related to Agree Strongly Agree technology 42 (62.69%) 12 (17.91%) questions and problems requirements are clearly stated 57 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Standard IV. Curriculum Criteria 4.1 The curriculum incorporates established professional standards, guidelines, and competencies, and has clearly articulated stu dent learning and program outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 1. 2. 3. Curricular content is congruent with curricular threads and professional standards and includes knowledge and skill sets The curriculum is developed on professional standards, guidelines, and competencies using the ANA standards of practice, ANA code of ethics, 2010 NLN outcomes, QSEN competencies and shows relationship to the clear student learning outcomes The program incorporates the NLNAC requirements for program outcomes. Documents Philosophy/framework including theorists if used Curricular plan/design Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m Frequency of Assessment Semesterly: January and August Assessment Method Comparative and quantitative analysis of professional standards, guidelines, and competencies to student curriculum and student learner outcome Table displaying Student learning Outcomes to ANA standards of practice, ANA code of ethics, 2010 NLN outcomes, and QSEN competencies. Table displaying the NLNAC requirements for program outcomes Plan Paper Document/ Location 58 Last updated/ Date/Initials Nov 17, 2011 Who Responsible ongoing faculty faculty Frequency What Month Semesterly: August and January Semesterly: August and January RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 nscu.edu/ Table: Student learning outcomes leveled Professional Standards/Guidelines: ANA standards of practice ANA code of ethics 2010 NLN Outcomes QSEN Competencies Table: Course Objectives that relate to the Curricular threads or Apprenticeships Teaching Strategies and Measurements Table including Program Outcomes with 1. Program Completion rate 2. Job placement rates 3. Licensure Pass rates 4. Program Satisfaction (graduate exit survey, 6 month alumni survey, employer surveys). Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Summer 2012 faculty Semesterly: August and January Summer 2011 faculty Semesterly: August and January Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document room Minutes: May 22, 2012; May 12, 2011 August 25, 2011 September 13, 2010 Semesterly: August and January Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document Room Semesterly: August and January Document Room Semesterly: EOS Meetings Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 E L A N o t M e t - College wide graduate follow-up surveys represent only a small number of nursing students; No ability to draw conclusions. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) September 13, 2010 December 14, 2010 59 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Revise: Issue identified that college wide surveys include only a small number of responses; unable to differentiate by program. Identified RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 1. 2. Curriculum—old program framework Program Outcomes table MCO work. 2011: ELA Met- college level data is not being gathered— graduate surveys and employer surveys have not been done. Called students in for consult. Students say they throw anything thing generic from Riverland away. Students said they would be more likely to respond if the surveys were electronic, came through their preferred email and came from the Nursing Department 1. Curriculum 2. Program outcomes table March 24, 2011 May 12, 2012 2012: E L A M e t - Faculty developed Nursing program generated exit and graduate follow-up surveys 1. Curriculum 2. Program outcomes table. May 22, 2012 9/11/12 9/18/12 Criteria 4.2 that college does not collect this data yearly; only as funding is available. Person responsible for this was changed. Revise: analysis of ways to change conceptual framework. Analysis of ways to gather specific data about program outcomes. Revise: Person responsible for this was changed three times. Identified that college wide data does not meet accreditation requirements. Action Plan: Develop NP generated surveys for students and employers. Revise: Adopted the NLN Competencies as conceptual framework.; worked through clinical evaluation tool; clinical portfolio tool, how it affects the curriculum. Revise: Faculty compiled retention survey. Revise: Action Plan: Work through how new conceptual framework impacts MCO’s; MCO’s revised to reflect the NLN Competencies. Course, Exit and alumni follow-up and employer surveys developed and sent to students. Piloted. Student learning outcomes forms completed, Revised Portfolio assignments Action Plans: ways to improve NCLEX-RN pass rates. Reviewed data for this cohort. The curriculum is developed by the faculty and regularly reviewed for rigor and currency. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The curriculum is developed by the faculty and reviewed By comparison to Exit Exams and Mountain Measurements for rigor and currency. Documents Evidence of faculty review of Frequency of Assessment Every year (August) Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room 60 Assessment Method Comparative analysis with national standards using the Exit Exams and Mountain Measurement. Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible faculty August RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 curriculum via meeting minutes Evidence of faculty review and documentation of decisions to maintain, revise or develop curriculum via meeting minutes Analysis of curricular changes and impact related to student learning and program outcomes in minutes https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document room faculty August Document room faculty August Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 ELA in process 1. Looking at curriculum models. Faculty feel the curriculum is not clear not only to students but to some of the faculty members 2. Mountain measurements purchased 2011: ELA in process- Adopted the NLN model spring of 2011 Exit surveys, and mountain measurements reviewed 2012: E L A M e t - working through from Master Course Outlines. to course level outcomes Exit exams, and mountain measurements reviewed: maintained. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Sept 13, 2010 August 25, 2011, December 12, 2011 December 15, 2011 March 1, 2012; May 22, 2012 Advisory Committee 6/28/12 61 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Revise: Review current literature and revise conceptual framework to clarify outcomes. Started subscribing to NCLEX Mountain Measurements. Maintain: ATI RN Predictor as an exit measure. Revise: Develop curriculum, content and assessment modalities based on the NLN Competencies Model. Carry out discussions with faculty to clarify questions and make model clear to all. Implementing new conceptual framework.; Taking through the Academic Affairs and Standards Council. Piloted the revised clinical Portfolio project. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.3 The student learning outcomes are used to organize the curriculum, guide the delivery of instruction, direct learning activit ies, and evaluate student progress. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The student learner outcomes are used to organize course objectives. Each course objective lists the learning activities and the measurements of the objectives. Possible Documents Meeting minutes for curricular changes based on student learning outcomes Evaluation tools for student clinical performance and written assignments (leveled and incorporate student learning outcomes) Analysis of ATI exams and plan of action for curricular changes based on date analysis TableCourse objectives, learning activities, and evaluation measurements Syllabi verify that each student has achieved the student learner outcomes Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Even Years (November) Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Comparative Analysis of student learner outcomes evaluated in curriculum, learning activities, instructional methods, and student progress and documented in meeting minutes Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Faculty Frequency What Month Even Years (November) Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document Room Faculty Even Years (November) Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Document Room Faculty Even Years (November) Document Room Faculty Even Years (November) Document Room Faculty Even Years (November) Rubric for each assignment in Faculty Even Years (November) 62 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Document Room document by Program Portfolio/ Clinical Evaluation Tool/etc. Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 E L A M e t - Begin work on college wide project of developing MCO’s for all coursework 2011 ELA Met- NLN outcomes incorporated into the MCO’s and followed through the approval process. 2012: ELA Met- Incorporating conceptual framework into all elements of the course. Piloting evaluation methods; rubrics, and evaluating impacts Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Sept 13, 2010 May 12, 2011; August 25, 2011 Nov 17, 2011 Dec 19, 2011 Jan 26, 2012 May 22, 2012 May 12, 2012 63 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Development: develop course Master Course Outlines. Development: Working on ways to make sure follow through from program outcomes down to unit outlines. Development: Continue working through process and evaluate effects of measures RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.4 The curriculum includes cultural, ethnic, and socially diverse concepts and may also include experiences from regional, natio nal, or global perspectives. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Cultural, ethnic and socially diverse concepts are threaded throughout the curriculum and include national and regional experiences. Frequency of Assessment Semesterly (May and December) Service learning projects incorporate providing services to diverse cultures Documents Table of diverse experiences (theory or clinical) how it is measured Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Papers/Projects Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Quantitative Analysis of curriculum for culturally diverse, ethnic, and social concepts. Quantitative analysis of simulations used and cultural concepts within it. Quantitative analysis of service learning projects, transcultural nursing and the international transcultural experiences. Last updated/ Date/Initials Document Room Who Responsible Frequency What Month Faculty Semesterly (May and December) Faculty Semesterly (May and December) Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Maintain: opened up an additional section of Transcultural Nursing because of demand. 2010 E L A M e t - Transcultural and International Transcultural Nursing Elective Course work for student continues in the program. This includes trips to South Texas and Ecuador. Service Learning elective also offered each semester. 2011 E L A M e t - Transcultural Nursing Elective Course work for student continues in the program. This includes trips to South Texas . Service Learning elective also offered each semester. Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Emails 11/30/11 Nursing Advisory presentation on 64 Action Plan: Identify the cultural concepts covered in the new curriculum; Look at the concepts presented in the simulations used within the program. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Diversity Project. Revise: Develop concept of Human Flourishing including the thread of diversity and dealing with differences. 2012: ELA Met-Transcultural Nursing Elective Course work for student continues in the program. This includes trips to South Texas. Emails Service Learning elective also offered each semester. Outlined Cultural Concepts threaded throughout the curriculum Criteria 4.5 Evaluation methodologies are varied, reflect established professional and practice competencies, and measure the achievement of student learning and program outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Students will demonstrate successful achievement of learner outcomes by portfolio/simulation evaluation: (Piloted 2012/ 2013) 80% of students will rate the achievement of the student learner outcomes at graduation as an average of agree/strongly agree . 80% of graduates will rate the student learner outcomes at 6 months post-graduation as an average of agree/strongly agree 80% of employers will rate students as meeting expectations of new graduates at agree/strongly agree. NCLEX Board Results will be at or above the national average Frequency of Assessment Method Assessment Yearly (August) follow- Quantitative/Qualitative Analysis: Student Learner Outcomes are assessed up with previous years by Program Portfolio/Simulation Evaluation work Quantitative Analysis: Student Exit Survey of Student Learner Outcomes Quantitative Analysis: 6 month graduate surveys of student learner outcomes Quantitative Analysis: 6 month post-graduation employee surveys. Quantitative Analysis of NCLEX-RN board results 65 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Documents Plan Paper Document/ Location Electronic Document/ Location Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Frequency What Month Sample evaluation methodologies Document Room Faculty Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work Assessment Tool such as Program Portfolio, Simulation Evaluation Document Room Faculty Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work Student Exit survey of Student Learner Outcomes results/minutes Document Room Faculty Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work 6 month graduate surveys of student learner outcomes results/minutes Document Room Faculty Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work 6 month post graduate employer survey results/minutes Document Room Faculty Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work Document Room Faculty/CNO Yearly (August) follow-up with previous years work NCLEX exam results/minutes Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Maintain 2010: ELA Met- Pass rates on NCLEX-RN above national average College wide graduate follow-up surveys represent only a small number of nursing students; No ability to draw conclusions 2011; ELA Met- Partially met: NCLEX_RN results Slightly lower than national average Noel-Levitz: Employer Satisfaction Survey—couldn’t identify data specific to the program; Not funded for the 2012. Called students in for consult. Students say they throw anything Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision May 12, 2011 Noel-Levitz results reviewed with Advisory committee 11/30/2011 66 Action Plan: Identified problem with college generated reports; review variables for this group. Develop NP generated Exit, 6-9 month follow-up and course specific surveys. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 thing generic from Riverland away. Students said they would be more likely to respond if the surveys were electronic, came through their preferred email and came from the Nursing Department NCLEX board results—not met; Students at 82%; National norm of 87% 2012: E L A Not met: NCLEX pass rates below national average Faculty developed Nursing program generated exit and graduate follow-up surveys NP generated Exit Survey-piloted NP generated 6 month graduate survey- piloted NP generated Employer survey-piloted Sept 4, 2012; Oct 2, 2012; Feb 16, 2012; March 1, 2012; May 22, 2012; May 9. 2012; 2013 ELA: Pending 67 Action Plan: A variety of measures looked at to see what happened with this group of students. Attempting to identify early predictors of groups’ potentials to pass NCLEX and institute remediation. Piloting exit, employer and graduate follow-up surveys See Minnesota Board of Nursing Plan of Corrective Action submitted to the Board of Nursing May of 2013 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.6 The curriculum and instructional processes reflect educational theory, interdisciplinary collaboration research, and best pra ctice standards while allowing for innovation, flexibility, and technological advances. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement The instructional processes reflect evidenced based research in the classroom and the clinical setting. Frequency of Assessment Yearly and as needed (September) Assessment Method Qualitative Analysis of new technological advances Quantitative Analysis of best practices incorporated into classroom and clinical setting. An eclectic approach adult learning theory is the foundation for the processes of education in the nursing program. Quantitative analysis of adult learning theory use in classroom and clinical setting. Technological advances are incorporated into nursing program. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Plan Paper Document/ Location Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Frequency What Month Course syllabi with learning activities listed Document Room Faculty September Papers/Projects Examples of Document Room Faculty September Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met: Adult Learning theory and technology used in the program. EBP introduced and taught in classroom and clinical. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Advisory Committee Meeting 11/29/10; 4/6/10 ACMdisaster simulation; EOS May 11, 2010 68 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Technology Master Plan; Disaster simulation interdisciplinary research; Video capture for lectures; high fidelity simulation, pod casting, camtasia, faculty laptops, D2L classroom platform. TRT funding, Simulation technology in classrooms and clinical settings, EMR, Pyxis RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2011: E L A M e t - Began incorporating QSEN adopted the NLN Framework. Adult Learning theory and technology used in the program. EBP introduced and taught in classroom and clinical. December 12, 2011 April 12, 2012; Feb 2012: E L A M e t - Continuing to research EBP and incorporate into curriculum, use of current literature into course work, inclusion 16, 2012; March 1 2012; May 22, 2012 of technology. Adult Learning theory and technology used in the program. 69 in lab, Lippincott skills tapes, Ongoing development; table developed and provided to faculty to help identify key concepts and make connections between these EBP guidelines. TRT funding for computers in the nursing office areas for students. Video capture for lectures; high fidelity simulation, pod casting, ECHO, faculty laptops, D2L classroom platform. Simulation technology in classrooms and clinical settings, EMR, Pyxsis in Lab Ongoing development: Created table of technologies used in classroom, simulation, and clinical settings. TRT funding for computers in the nursing office areas for students. Video capture for lectures; high fidelity simulation, pod casting, ECHO, faculty laptops, D2L classroom platform. Simulation technology in classrooms and clinical settings, EMR, Pyxsis RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.7 Program length is congruent with the attainment of identified outcomes and consistent with the policies of the governing orga nization, state and national standards, and best practices. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Program length is congruent with MnSCU, Minnesota and national standards and best practices. Students will complete the program in 3 semesters Documents Frequency of Assessment Odd years (November) Plan Paper Document/ Location Electronic Document/ Location Assessment Method Comparative analysis of program length to MnSCU, Minnesota, and national standards Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Frequency What Month Documentation of like programs and length Accreditation Site Document Room Faculty Odd years (November) Faculty minutes reflecting analysis of program length and completion Accreditation Site Document Room Faculty Odd years (November) 60/120 Waiver Document Accreditation Site Document Room CNO Odd years (November) MANE Curriculum Documents Accreditation Site Document Room CNO/Faculty Odd years (November) Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain current processes. 2010: E L A M e t - Pathway: more credits for AD than most programs in the MnSCU System; however students receive two credentials for these credits. (PN Diploma and AS in nursing) (38 PN +34 AD=72) 2011: E L A M e t - 60/120 legislation passed stipulating an AS Degree can be no longer than 60 credits. Waiver applied for. August 25, 2011 2012: E L A M e t - MnSCU and MBN rulings on pathway. Waiver Denied. Move to work toward MANE curriculum April 5, 2012; May 22, 2012 70 Working through changes with credit waiver materials; changes called for by MnSCU and by MBN (see self-study report) (see the 60/120 Waiver Application) Revise: On-going—change to MANE.( see self-study report) (See MANE Documents RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.8 4.8.1 Practice learning environments are appropriate for student learning and support the achievement of student learning and progr am outcomes; current written agreements specify expectations for all parties and ensure the protection of students. Student clinical experiences reflect current best practices and nationally established patient health and safety goals. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 80% of students evaluate the clinical site as being appropriate for learning (likert scale agree/strongly agree) 100% of clinical sites have up to date clinical contracts signed. Clinical Site Visits are made by the Director or faculty coordinator to the clinical site. Clinical sites will reflect current best practices and nationally established patient health and safety goals. Documents Clinical agency agreements /contracts Student clinical survey /evaluation tool Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ Frequency of Assessment Yearly (September) Yearly (September) Assessment Method Quantitative analysis of surveys or evaluation instruments Quantitative Analysis of clinical contracts Meeting minutes from site visits by Director or faculty coordinator. Yearly (September) Qualitative Analysis of clinical sites best practices and nationally established patient health and safety goals. Plan Paper Document/ Location Administrative Assistant’s Office Files Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Faculty/ Administrative Assistant Frequency What Month Yearly (September) Yearly (September) Document Room Faculty Yearly (September) Student & Faculty Clinical site evaluations Document Room Copies of Signed Clinical Agreements along with Spreadsheet demonstrating currency Administrative Assistant’s Office Files Faculty 71 Yearly (September) Administrative Assistant RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Copies of Meeting Minutes/email memo with Clinical Site DON’s Yearly (September) Document Room/CNO’s records CNO Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 E L A M e t - Clinical settings evaluated each semester. No standard clinical site evaluation forms used. Contracts with each site; up to date. All clinical sites hold the appropriate accreditation. status ELA Met- New stipulations that all clinical activities whether 2011: observational or active participation, must have the same clinical Memorandum of Agreement per AG’s office 2012: E L A M e t - All clinical contracts up to date; last updated as appropriate 1. 80% of students evaluate the clinical site as being appropriate for learning (likert scale agree/strongly agree) 2. Met: 100% of clinical sites have up to date clinical contracts signed. 3. Met: Clinical Site Visits are made by the Director or faculty coordinator to the clinical site. 4. Met: Clinical sites will reflect current best practices and nationally established patient health and safety goals. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain December 15, 2011 Work with all agencies to institute these changes. CNO meeting notes; regularly scheduled meeting EOM in Owatonna. Action Plan: Evaluate timing on this process. Need to do clinical site evaluations on a yearly or semesterly basis; probably after students have been in the agency. All major agencies meet accreditation criteria. A program form developed to evaluate each clinical site included within the course evaluations. 72 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 4.9 Learning activities, instructional materials, and evaluation methods are appropriate for the delivery format and consistent with student learning outcomes. (Distance Learning) Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 80% of Student evaluations of online delivery indicate that instructional materials and evaluation methods are appropriate and consistent with student learning outcomes. (agree/strongly agree) Documents Electronic Document/ Location Course evaluations Frequency of Assessment Yearly (September)— review data from previous year. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Assessment Method Qualitative Analysis: Student evaluations of online courses Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Frequency What Month Faculty Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Not Met- Course evaluations address student satisfaction with online learning activities. Students consistently say they are hands on learners. The RCCADNP does not have two cohorts. All students receive both online and face to face contact with the program. 2011: ELA Not Met- Course evaluations address student satisfaction with online learning activities. Students consistently say they are hands on learners. 2012: ELA Not Met- Course evaluations address student satisfaction with online learning activities. Students consistently say they are hands on learners. The RCCADNP does not have two cohorts. All students receive both online and face to face contact with the program. The RCCADNP does not have two cohorts. All students receive both online and face to face contact with the program. 73 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Standard V. Resources Criteria 5.1 Fiscal resources are sufficient to ensure the achievement of the nursing education unit outcomes and commensurate with the re sources of the governing organization. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement RCC’s Nursing Program’s operational budget is adequate to support nursing program outcomes and shall be commensurate with the resources of the governing organization Documents College-wide budget allocation Nursing budget allocation Differential tuition documentation in nursing and college budget with justification Electronic Document/ Location https://staff.riverland.e du/financefacilities/Revenue.pdf Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ http://www.riverland.e du/tuition/programcosts.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/nurs/faq.cfm?size=8 462#a7 Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Chief nursing officer and faculty will determine whether approved Annually in October budget met program needs. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Last updated Who Responsible Monthly Chief Financial Officer Document room Monthly Document room Annually CNO Review and creation of budget proposal during Nursing Workgroup and Division meetings. Dean monitors budget monthly. Chief Financial Officer With input from Dean/Chief Nursing Officer http://www.riverland.e du/pos/program.cfm?p rogid=48 74 Frequency What Month Monthly Review and creation of budget proposal during Nursing Workgroup and Division meetings. Annually July RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Grant funding Document room Annually Workforce Effectiveness Coordinator Annually Document room Annually Business Consultant Annually https://staff.riverland.e du/financefacilities/Revenue.pdf Document room Annually Chief Financial Officer Annually http://www.riverland.e du/tuition/programcosts.cfm Document room Annually Chief Financial Officer With input from Dean/Chief Nursing Officer Annually July Perkins TRT Foundation Grant https://staff.riverland.e du/financefacilities/Revenue.pdf Bridges to Healthcare (B2HC) http://www.cte.mnscu. edu/MN_State_Plan/pe rkinsIV/FY12RiverlandA pplication.pdf DOL Hospital sources Table- comparison of nursing budget with other similar programs Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: ELA Met- Submitted proposed budget was approved by faculty funding was comparable to other programs. Operational budget has been adequate to support learning outcomes and program needs. Budget adequate to meet program needs. Maintain current level of fiscal resource Review and creation of budget proposals to identify needs to upgrade the nursing lab. Additional sources of funding supplement the budget to support a state of the art learning environment. (see potential funding resources document) 2011: ELA Met- Submitted proposed budget was approved by faculty see above. Budget adequate to meet program needs. Maintain current level of fiscal resource Review and creation of budget proposals during Nursing Meetings and Division meetings. Peer and professional tutoring implemented. Maintain current level of fiscal resource Review and creation of budget proposals during Nursing Meetings and Division meetings. 2012: ELA Met- see above Submitted proposed budget was approved by faculty. Budget adequate to meet program needs. 75 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 5.2 Physical resources (classrooms, laboratories, offices, etc.) are sufficient to ensure the achievement of the nursing educatio n unit outcomes and meet the needs of faculty, staff, and students. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement A minimum of 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with classroom and laboratory settings on course specific, exit, and graduate follow-up Frequency of Assessment Assessment Method Annually in October Chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data. A qualitative analysis by inspection or comparative by campuses (if more than 1 site) will be done by the chief nursing officer and faculty. Sufficient office, classroom and laboratory space is provided. Documents Identification & description of physical resources: faculty offices Electronic Document/ Location Facility master plan Directory: http://www.riverland.e du/aqip/pdfs/FinalMast erPlan.pdf Student physical resources (lockers, breastfeeding rooms, simulation lab, library, storage, interview stream) Facility master plan Directory: http://www.riverland.e du/aqip/pdfs/FinalMast erPlan.pdf Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Last updated Who Responsible 2011 Physical Plant Director, Physical Plant Operations Document room 2011 Physical Plant Director, Physical Plant Operations Parent room: http://www.riverland.e du/prc/index.cfm Computer labs: http://www.riverland.e du/computerresources/ open-lab.cfm Student Success Center: 76 Frequency What Month Every 5 years January Every 5 years January RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Meeting rooms & private room for student conferences http://www.riverland.e du/successcenter/disabilityservices.cfm Library: http://www.riverland.e du/library/index.cfm Document room 2011 Physical Plant Director, Physical Plant Operations Every 5 years Open nursing lab Exit Survey www.surveymonkey.co m Document room Yearly Institutional Research, Student Affairs Annually Table of Exit survey: Nursing Practice Laboratory space adequate Classroom were adequate Facility master plan Directory: http://www.riverland.e du/aqip/pdfs/FinalMast erPlan.pdf Document room 2011 Physical Plant Director, Physical Plant Operations Every 5 years End of each semester Course instructors Each semester Student evaluations – course surveys Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Partially Met- Identified need for increased lab space; no evaluation done with students. Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Informal conversations 2011: ELA Partially Met- Identified need for meeting area and computer access/printing, identified need for tutoring; no evaluation done with students Dec 19, 2011; Oct. 28, 2011; August 25, 2011 2012:ELA Partially Met- Identified room for lactation room and May 9, 2012; Jan 25, 2012, April 13, 2012; September 4, 2012 parenting room, identified need for counselor dedicated to nursing; No evaluation done with students. NURS 2010 Course Evaluation indicated 86% of students satisfied with physical resources. 77 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain facilities master plan process. Convert classroom B102 to lab space Faculty moved into current office spaces. Implement evaluation process. Convert unused space adjacent (A 152, A153, A 162, A163) to nursing faculty suite to a nursing open lab, obtain a tutor for the nursing students (paid peer tutors) utilizing conference room (A153) Converted classroom A239 into a parent room, converted a handicap accessible restroom into a lactation room, dedicated nursing counselor on site (A 161). Implement new exit survey. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 5.3 Learning resources and technology are selected by the faculty and are comprehensive, current, and accessible to faculty and students, including those engaged in alternative methods of delivery. Assessment 1. 2. 3. 4. Expected Level of Achievement Learning resources and technology resources will be comprehensive, current, and accessible to all students and faculty. Faculty will have input in choosing learning resources and technology. The college library, the nursing faculty resource library, and nursing student resource library will be current, relevant and accessible. 80% of nursing students will report satisfaction with learning and technology resources on the student satisfaction survey. Documents Faculty minutes document review and analysis of resources with decisions to maintain revise or develop resources Library hours and utilization Computer commons hours and utilization Frequency of Assessment Annually in October and ongoing Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.edu/ http://www.riverland.e du/library/index.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/computerresources/ open-lab.cfm http://www.riverland.e du/administration/Mast Assessment Method A qualitative analysis by inspection or comparative by campuses will be done by the chief nursing officer. The chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze the Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data. Faculty meeting minutes will reflect a review of current resources and proposed acquisitions. Faculty meeting minutes will reflect a review of current resources and proposed acquisitions. The chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data. Chief nursing officer and faculty will analyze Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data. Plan Paper Document/ Location Last updated Who Responsible Document room May Dean/Chief Nursing Officer with input from faculty Document room Librarian, Academic Affairs Document room Technology Master Plan consisting of the Technology Plan Task Force/ 78 2012 Frequency What Month Annually Reviewed and revisited every three years Spring RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 er-Technology-Plan.pdf Simulation lab hours and utilization http://rvrcm.riverland.e du/nursing Simulation Policy and Procedure Manual in Document room 2012 Document room Every semester Technology Roundtable (TRT) Members Nursing Lab Assistant, Academic Affairs Annually Fall Training schedule: D2L orientation Distance learning http://www.riverland.e du/rvrblog/post.cfm/d2 l-laptop-orientation2012-fall-schedule http://www.riverland.e du/dl/gettingstarted.cfm Running list of needs Computer replacement schedule Simulation equipment maintenance /replacement schedule Nursing video list http://www.riverland.e du/administration/Mast er-Technology-Plan.pdf Document room 2012 Document room 2012 Document room 2012 Simulation Policy and Procedure Manual in Document room 2012 Document room 2012 79 Office of Instructional Technology Technology Master Plan consisting of the Technology Plan Task Force/ Technology Roundtable (TRT) Members Dean/Chief Nursing Officer Technology Master Plan consisting of the Technology Plan Task Force/ Technology Roundtable (TRT) Members Nursing Lab Assistant, Academic Affairs Dean/Chief Nursing Every semester Reviewed and revisited every three years Spring Through email annually Spring Reviewed and revisited every three years Spring Annually Fall Every two years RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Library resources list including online and hard copy Journal subscription resource list Fall http://www.riverland.e du/library/health.cfm Document room 2012 Dean/Chief Nursing Officer Every two years Fall http://www.riverland.e du/library/health.cfm Document room 2012 Dean/Chief Nursing Officer Every two years Fall Document room 2012 Level leads Annually Document room Every semester Faculty Every semester Document room Yearly Institutional Research, Student Affairs Annually Document room 2012 Book resources in nursing open lab Integration of ATI/ Kaplan resources to enhance tutoring, remediation and testing www.atitesting.com http://www.kaptest.co m/NCLEX/Home/index. html Exit Survey www.surveymonkey.co m College survey- Institutional Research Officer http://www.its.mnscu.e du/ Institutional Research, Student Affairs Every two years Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Maintain current evaluation process. Increase lab space by converting classroom B102 into lab, 2010: ELA Met- ADN lab utilization 432 hours, identified need to increase access to lab and increase space. NURS 2010 Course Evaluation (81%) Agree/strongly agree satisfied with technology. 2011: ELA Met- AD lab utilization 456 hours, identified need to increase access to lab and increase space above. NURS 2010 Course Evaluation (90%) Agree/strongly agree satisfied with technology. 2012: ELA Met- AD lab utilization 576 hours; NURS 2010 Course Evaluation (73.5%) Agree/strongly agree satisfied with technology. Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision August 25, 2011; Dec 19 2011 Maintain current evaluation process; see above Increased hours spent in lab Sept 4, 2012; Jan 25, 2012; May 9, 2012 Maintain current evaluation process; Scheduling tool updated. Implement updated Exit Survey. 80 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 5.4 Fiscal, physical, technological, and learning resources are sufficient to meet the needs of faculty and students and ensure that stud ents achieve learning outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Please refer to 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 expected levels of achievement above. Fiscal physical ,technology and learning resources are sufficient to meet the needs of faculty and ensure student achieve learning outcomes Documents Frequency of Assessment Annually in October Electronic Document/ Location Exit Survey www.surveymonkey.co m College survey- Institutional Research http://www.its.mnscu.e du/ Table of Exit survey: Nursing Practice Laboratory space adequate Classroom were adequate Facility master plan Directory: http://www.riverland.e du/directory/index.cfm Assessment Method Refer to 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 above. Assessment data will be the same with the Student Satisfaction Exit Survey data also analyzing satisfaction with distance learning in the program. Plan Paper Document/ Location Document room Last updated Who Responsible Yearly Institutional Research, Student Affairs Institutional Research, Student Affairs Frequency What Month Annually Document room 2012 Document room 2011 Physical Plant Director, Physical Plant Operations Every 5 years End of each semester Course instructors Each semester Student evaluations – course surveys Every two years Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 2010: ELA Met- refer to 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 81 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2011: ELA Met- refer to 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 2012: ELA Met- refer to 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 Standard VI. Outcomes Criteria 6.1 The systematic plan for evaluation emphasizes the ongoing assessment and evaluation of the student learning and program outcomes of the nursing education unit and NLNAC standards. Assessment 1. 2. Expected Level of Achievement The systematic plan for evaluation is reviewed and updated yearly. Program review every 5 years Frequency of Assessment 1. December and May Assessment plan reviewed each year and Ongoing month by month of designated evaluation items of SEP (see calendar) 82 Assessment Method 1. Reviewed by full faculty at beginning of school year Standing item agenda at each faculty meeting to evaluate SEP items designated 2. Analysis by standardized forms provided by college. Reviewed in meeting minutes which reflect discussion, action plan and follow through of outcomes. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Documents Faculty meeting minutes Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Last updated Who Responsible December 2012 Faculty October 2012 CNO December and May Assessment plan reviewed each year and Ongoing month by month of designated evaluation items of SEP (see calendar) CNO December and May Assessment plan reviewed each year and Ongoing month by month of designated evaluation items of SEP (see calendar) Advisory meeting minutes Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Document Room College Nursing Program Review as required by MnSCU (AQIP) Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Document Room 83 Frequency What Month December and May Assessment plan reviewed each year and Ongoing month by month of designated evaluation items of SEP (see calendar) RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010 E L A N o t M e t - Data incomplete. College lead activities are incomplete. 2011: ELA: Met Revised SEP from 2005, 2008 version. 2012: ELA Met- continuing to evaluate and revise SEP Attempting to generate consistent evaluation across course work Program review due April of 2013; Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Sept 13, 2010 May 12, 2011; Aug 25, 2011; Oct, 7 2011; Oct. 28, 2011, Nov. 17, 2011, Dec 2, 2011, Dec 12, 2011, Dec 19, 2011, Oct 2, 2012, April 13, 2012, Feb 16, 2012, March 22, 2012, March 1, 2012; May 22, 2012, 84 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Not keeping pace with this—work to update old schedule ACTION Plan: Incorporate NLNAC Standards Develop a workable plan for month to month review. Devise a plan how to make sharing course and clinical evaluations “safe” for faculty—i.e., information will not be use for disciplinary purposes. Maintain current process/revise and develop as findings indicate SEP further refined to a four year schedule Program review pushed back to Spring 2013 because of upcoming reaccreditation visit. Process of documenting this being redesigned by college . May change documentation for the upcoming review RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 6.2 Aggregated evaluation findings inform program decision-making and are used to maintain or improve students’ learning outcomes. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 1. 2. ATI – RN Comprehensive predictor tests results are used to improve student learning outcomes. Mountain Measurement results are used to evaluate curriculum, make changes to curriculum, and to improve student learner outcomes. Frequency of Assessment 1. End of semester; Annually; Monthly as designated items of SEP Month 2. End of semester; Annually; Monthly as designated items of SEP Month Assessment Method Analysis: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of survey data and faculty minutes Review of meeting minutes from various venues to discuss student learning and program outcomes including but not limited to: -Nursing -Faculty Meetings -Committee minutes- curriculum, outcome -Advisory Board Meetings -Administrative Program Review Meeting minutes will reflect the discussion, action plan and follow through outcomes Review scores on ATI testing as compared to program established benchmarks. Comparison ATI comprehensive predictor analysis used to inform curriculum changes. Changes and plans of action noted in meeting minutes Review the NCSBN Program reports (Mountain Measurement) and determine an action plan as appropriate Review Program survey findings. Data is aggregated and trended with documentation of plan to improve program and student outcomes based on survey data and analysis Possible Documents Electronic Document/ Location Plan Paper Document/ Location 85 Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Document Room ongoing Faculty Analysis of Nursing Program surveys. Document Room ongoing Faculty and CNO Analysis of College Survey Instruments such as CCSSE or Noel-Levitz (institutional research) Faculty meeting minutes Document Room Systematic Plan of Evaluation (SEP) Analysis of Program Outcomes Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ ATI performances NCSBN Results Institutional Research Document Room Ongoing Faculty Faculty Document Room Semesterly 5/2013 Semester 5/2013 November 2012 5/2013 Accreditation D2L Site: Document Room https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Faculty CNO/Faculty Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 2010: ELA Partially Met- Small response from nursing students for exit survey. 2011 E L A P a r t i a l l y M e t - College now doing exit surveys every other year. Not completed this year Mountain Measurement data reviewed and trended May 12, 2011, 2012: E L A In process. Nursing Faculty have initiated this process Mountain Measurements reviewed and trended. Sept 4, 2012, Feb 16, 2012, March 1, 2012; May 22, 2012, 86 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Problem Identified: program needs to develop NP generated course specific; exit and graduate follow-up, and employer surveys Started subscribing to NCLEX Mountain Measurements. Maintain: ATI RN Predictor as an exit measure. Develop tools for exit, graduate follow-up Surveys Pilot tools; maintain or revise as needed. Action plan: Review trended data from ATI; Mountain Measures; Student surveys, employer surveys to see if changes have positive or negative effects. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 See documents. NCLEX-PN from 2012 show improvement in these 2013 Mountain measurements trended. Showing improvments for May 2013 areas: safety and infection control, health promotion and PN; down for RN for group that took test in 2012 maintenance, psychological integrity, basic care and comfort, pharmacologic therapies, reduction of risk potentiola and physiological adaptation, all areas of nursing process , protective funcations, sensory percptual, fluid-gas transport, psychoscial, cultural, elimination, cardiovascular,immune, neuro sensory, psychosocial/behavioral, GU, renal RN Mountain measurements show improvements in reduction of risk potential, nursing process: evaluation, nutrition, endocrine/metabolic, psychosocial/behavioral, health maintenance, and health restoration, interdependence. See individual scores for paricular tests and how they are trending. Showed over all improvments in RN predictor, Pharmacology, and RN medical surgical nursing. ATI Test measures for groups in 2013 87 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 6.3 Evaluation findings are shared with communities of interest. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Frequency of Assessment Evaluation finds are shared with the advisory board on a semi-annual basis. Semesterly May/December Possible Documents Plan Paper Document/ Location Electronic Document/ Location Assessment Method Review -Advisory meeting agenda and minutes. -College program communications Last Updated Who Responsible Minutes of meetings with clinical partners Document Room ongoing CNO Advisory Board minutes Document Room Semi-annual CNO/Administrative Assistant Grant reports/funding Document Room ongoing CNO ongoing CNO ongoing CNO www.riverland.edu/nur s/index.cfm Website College newsletter; college or Presidents report to the community, local newspaper articles Document Room Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: E L A M e t - Communication has taken place; meetings as scheduled Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 11/29/2010; 4/6/2010 88 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Maintain communication RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2011: ELA Met- Communication has taken place; meetings as scheduled 2012: E L A M e t - Communication has taken place; meetings as scheduled 6/29/2011; 11/302011 6/28/2012; 10/24/2012 2013 ELA Met 4/2013 Check dates Criteria 6.4 Maintain communication Maintain communication Action: Improve Student Satisfaction Information through trending planned course evaluations, Exit and Six-month follow-up studies. Maintain communication Action: Improve Student Satisfaction Information through trending planned course evaluations, Exit and Six-month follow-up studies. Graduates demonstrate achievement of competencies appropriate to role preparation. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 80% of graduates rank agree/strongly agree on likert scale that they were adequately prepared for RN Frequency of Assessment Semesterly May/December 80 % of Employers rank agree/strongly agree on likert scale that graduates were adequately prepared for RN practice. Assessment Method Analysis: Quantitative 6-9 month post Graduate survey; analysis of employer surveys bases on Student Learning Outcomes and Program Learning Outcomes Analysis of student achievement of competencies in Table, Portfolio, Simulation Evaluation/Notebook, etc. 100% of graduates demonstrate achievement of competencies as evidenced by ongoing clinical evaluation, course work and capstone project. (Portfolio) Documents Electronic Document/ Location Employer survey Plan Paper Document/ Location Last updated Who Responsible Document Room November 2012 Faculty/CNO Document Room October 2012 CNO/ Administrative Assistant Course evaluations Document room December 2012 Faculty Table of Graduate survey results Document Room December 2012 Faculty Advisory Committee minutes Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ 89 Frequency What Month RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Table of Employee survey results Document Room December 2012 Implementation and Evaluation 90 CNO/Faculty RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Results of Data: Collection and Analysis 2010: ELA Met- Advisory meeting goals have been met. Employer survey minimal results; course evaluations done, but not reflecting consistency across courses and with NLNAC Standards 2011 E L A P a r t i a l l y M e t - Advisory meeting goals have been met; no data collected by the college; course evaluations done; attempted some consistency across courses; 2012: E L A M e t - Advisory meeting goals have been met; graduate and exit surveys developed by faculty and piloted; course evaluations revised to reflect NLNAC standards and program outcomes. Graduate survey-Piloted Employer survey--Piloted Portfolio: Met Criteria 6.5 6.5.1 Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 9/13/2010 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Evaluate options for data collection 5/12/2011 8/25/2011 Develop new program specific surveys (course, exit, and 6 month follow-up) December 2012 Pilot new surveys (course, exit, and 6 month follow-up) and revise as needed The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the following program outcomes: Performance on licensure exam, program completion, program satisfaction and job placement. The licensure exam pass rates will be at or above the national mean. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement RCCADNP graduate first time NCLEX pass rates be at or above the national mean (NCSBN) 88.4% (2010) Frequency of Assessment Every 6 months in December and May Plan 91 Assessment Method Quarterly and annual NCLEX results; comparative analysis with national and state NCLEX results. Meeting minutes will reflect the discussion, action plan and follow through outcomes RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Documents Table of program outcomes NCLEX pass rates Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Paper Document/ Location Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty Document Room Fall 2012 CNO/Faculty Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Continue to assess 2010: ELA Met- pass rate was 94.64% (National mean was 87.42) 98% job placement; Program completion 71.27% adjusted; program satisfaction see retention study. 2011 E L A N o t M e t - pass rate was 82.09 (National mean was 87.9) Job placement no data; MnSCU is a least a year behind in publishing this data. Program completion was 82.42 (adjusted); see selfEstudy 2012: L A Nfor o tprogram M e t - satisfaction Pass rate (incomplete data) but so far Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision December 2, 2011 Continue to assess. May 22, 2012 Action Plan: Did analysis of factors that could account for this. First year of new admission criterion. Looking at what changed for this group. largest retention rate (unadjusted) for this group Fluke or possible trend. Some of planned actions include: 1. Remediation of NCLEX predictor test 2. Evaluate test discriminations for each course 3. ATI remediation, retest benchmark. 4. Faculty to individually go through tests for review with students 5. Test taking skills workshops. 6. MBN Survey for Corrective Action : See corrective action plan submitted to the Board May of 2013. scores have fallen off precipitously. No data about national mean. Program completion is 82.56%, See study for comments about program satisfaction. No job placement data from MnSCU for 2011, and 2012. 92 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 6.5 The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the following program outcomes: Performance on licensure exam, program completion, program satisfaction and job placement. 6.5.2 Levels of achievement for program completion are determined by the faculty and reflect program demographics, academic progression, and program history. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 75% of RCCADNP students will successfully complete the nursing program within 150 % (three semesters) of the time from entry into the program. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ definition Aggregated and trended Program completion data Table of entry # students (cohort) and students who graduate and show % Document why students drop out of program Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Frequency of Assessment Semesterly (December May) Assessment Method Quantitative data analysis at the end of the program Meeting minutes will reflect the discussion, action plan and follow through outcomes Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Last updated Who Responsible Fall 2012 Faculty Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 93 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2010: ELA Not Met- Program completion 71.27% (adjusted); program satisfaction see study. * adjusted means those who were unsuccessful the first time and now were successful in 150% of total program time. 11/22/2010 Maintain: Continue to assess 2011 ElA Met- Program completion was 82.42% (adjusted); 5/12/2011 Maintain: Continue to assess 2012: ELA Met- Program completion is 82.56% 3/8/2012; 3/22/2012; 4/13/2012; 5/22/2012; 9/4/2012 Maintain Continue to assess: compare the retention rates with board pass rates. 2013: ELA-pending Criteria 6.5 6.5.3 The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the following program outcomes: Performance on licensure exam, program completion, program satisfaction and job placement. Program satisfaction measures (qualitative and quantitative) address graduate and their employers. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Frequency of Assessment 94 Assessment Method RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 1. 80% of RCCADNP graduates who respond to the survey will report satisfaction (agree/strongly agree) with the preparation for nursing practice provided by the program. (qualitative) 2. 90% of graduates will agree/strongly agree that they are able to complete student learning outcomes. (quantitative) 80% of RCCADNP 6 months graduates who respond to the survey will report satisfaction (agree/strongly agree) with the preparation for nursing practice provided by the program. (qualitative) 80% of employers of graduates who respond to the 6 to 12 month graduate follow-up survey will report satisfaction ( agree/strongly agree on liker scale) with the competency of graduates from RCCADNP as defined by the student learning outcomes and graduate competencies Qualitative 3. 4. 5. Semesterly May/December Quantitative analysis of graduate exit survey, 6 to 12 month graduate surveys and employer surveys. Meeting minutes will reflect the discussion, action plan and follow through outcomes Analysis of response rate from Graduates and from employers. Meeting minutes will reflect the discussion, action plan and follow through outcomes 80% of employers of graduates who respond to the graduate follow-up survey will state that RCCADNP 95 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 6. 7. nursing program prepared them adequately for entry level practice as an RN. QuantitativeSLO’s 50% of graduates will respond to grad survey 25%of employers will respond to employer survey . Documents Electronic Document/ Location Plan Paper Document/ Location Last updated/ Date/Initials Who Responsible Employer survey Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty/CNO Graduate survey Document Room Fall 2012 Faculty/CNO Document Room Fall 2012 CNO/Administrative Assistant Advisory Board Minutes Accreditation D2L Site: https://riverland.ims.m nscu.ecdu/ Frequency What Month Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 2010: E L A N o t M e t - Small response from nursing students 2011 E L A N o t M e t - No study was done by the college 5/12/2011 2012 ELA-Pending 3/1/2012; 3/22/2012; 4/13/2012; 5/22/2012; 9/4/2012 96 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision Unable to draw conclusion from small amount of data; looking at other options Develop NP generated surveys Graduate surveys, 6 month post graduate surveys, employer surveys. Piloting new surveys generated through the nursing department; results to follow. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 6.5 The program demonstrates evidence of achievement in meeting the following program outcomes: Performance on licensure exam, program completion, program satisfaction and job placement. 6.5.4 Job placement rates were addressed through quantified measures that reflect program demographics and history. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement 80% of graduates will be employed within 6 months of program completion as a Registered Nurse Documents Electronic Document/ Location MnSCU placement surveys Frequency of Assessment Yearly (December) Plan Paper Document/ Location Assessment Method Quantitative analysis of 6 month graduate surveys. Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month Document Room Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) 2010 E L A M e t - 98% job placement 2011: No official MnSCU data 5/12/2011 2012: No official MnSCU data 3/22/2012; 5/22/2012; 9/4/2012 97 Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision maintain According to Mindi Askleson—MnSCU is 2 years behind Building questions into 6-9 month graduate follow-up concerning full or part time employment and return to school. RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Criteria 6.6 The systematic plan for evaluation encompasses students enrolled in distance education and includes evidence that studen t learning and program outcomes are comparable for all students. Assessment Expected Level of Achievement Student learning outcomes and program outcomes are the same for all students regardless of method of delivery. Documents Electronic Document/ Location Aggregated course evaluation data. Aggregated capstone project results. Frequency of Assessment Each semester (May and December Plan Paper Document/ Location Document Room Rubric/Project description in Document Room Assessment Method Surveys in D2L Last updated Who Responsible Frequency What Month Faculty Pending completion of first cohort Faculty Implementation and Evaluation Results of Data: Collection and Analysis Reviewed in Staff Meeting Minutes (date) Action for Program Development, Maintenance, or Revision 2010: E L A M e t - Contained in course materials described above Course evaluation address student satisfaction with on-line learning activities Data is no different since all course materials are partially on line for all students. There is no distinction to be made. 2011 E L A M e t - Contained in course materials described above Course evaluation address student satisfaction with on-line learning activities Data is no different since all course materials are partially on line for all students. There is no distinction to be made. 2012: E L A M e t - Contained in course materials described above Course evaluation address student satisfaction with on-line learning activities Data is no different since all course materials are partially on line for all students. There is no distinction to be made. 98 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 Revised Systematic Plan for Evaluation Riverland Community College ADN Program 10/2/12 Standard Year 1 (2010) Year 3 (2012) Year 2 (2011) At hire 1.1 Mission/philosophy and outcomes are congruent with the organization 1.2 Student , faculty, administrators represented in governance 1.3 Communities of interest have input 1.4 Partnerships exist that promote excellence, enhance profession and benefit the community 1.5 Nursing Administrator 1.6 Nurse administrator authority and responsibility/adequate time and resources 1.7 faculty input into preparing and administering of program budget 1.8 Polices of the NEU are comprehensive, welfare of faculty, and are consistent 1.9 Records reflect due process for program complaints 1.10 Distance education is congruent with the governing organization 2.1 Full time faculty Master’s Degree 2.1.1 Majority of parttime minimum of master’s degree Even/ odd yearly Semesterl y monthly At hire Even/ odd yearly Semesterly monthly At hire Even/odd yearly Year 4 (2013) Semesterly Odd X * and as needed At hire Even/ odd yearly Semesterly Odd x* and as needed x x x x monthly x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X 99 monthly RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 2.1.2 Rationale for use of people who do not X hold master's degree 2.2 Faculty meet X governing organizations and state requirements 2.3 Credentials of lab people are X commensurate with their responsibilities 2.4 The number and utilization offull and X X X X part time faculty ensure programs outcomes are achieved 2.5 Scholarship and evidence based teaching and clinical practice X 2.6 The number, utilization,and X X X X X X X X X X X credentials of nonnurse faculty 2.7 Full and part time faculty are oriented and mentored 2.8 Systematic X X X X X X X X X X X X assessment of faculty performance demonstrates competencies 2.9 Non-nurse faculty and staff performance is reguIa rly reviewed in accordance with policies 2.10 Faculty engage in ongoing development and receive support in distance education modalities including instructional methods and evaluation 3.1Congruent student policies, consistently applied Even* Even* and as and as needed needed 10 0 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 3.2 Student services 3.3 Student education and financial records 3.4 Compliance with HERA title IV 3.4.1 A written student loan repayment program 3.4.2 Students are informed of responsibilities 3.5 Integrity and consistency exist for all information intended to inform the public 3.6 Changes in policies and procedures and program information are clearly and consistently communicated to students 3.7 Orientation to technology is provided and tech support is available 3.8 Information related to technology and policies specific to distance education are clear, accurate, consistent and accessible 4.1 Curriculum: established professional standards, guidelines, competencies, student learning and program outcomes 4.2 Curriculum developed by the faculty and reviewed regularly 4.3 Student learning outcomes are used to organize the x X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits x X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits x x X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits x X financial audits x x x x x x x x X x x x x x x x x X financial audits X financial audits X financial audits x x x Even years* and as Even years* and as 10 1 x x x RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 curriculum, direct learning activities, and evaluate student progress 4.4 Curriculum includes cultural, ethnic, socially diverse concepts 4.5 Evaluation methodologies are varied, reflect established professional practice competencies, and measure achievement to student learning outcomes 4.6 Curriculum reflect educational theory, interdisciplinary collaboration, research, and best practice standards 4.7 Program length is congruent with agency, state and national standards and best practices 4.8 Practice learning environments are appropriate for student learning and support achievement of student learning and program outcomes; current written agreements 4.8.1 Student experiences reflect best practices and nationally established health and safety goals 4.9 Learning activities, instructional materials, evaluation methods are appropriate for the delivery format and consistent with student learning outcomes needed needed x x x x x x x x x x x x Odd years* and as needed Odd years* and as needed Odd years* and as needed x x x x x x x x x 10 2 x x RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 5.1Fiscal resources are X X X X 5.2 Physical resources are sufficient X X X X 5.3 learning resources and technology are selected by faculty and students X X X X 5.4 Fiscal, physical, technological and learning resources are sufficient to meet the needs of faculty and students X X X X sufficient 6.1 SEP emphasizes the ongoing assessment and evaluation of X X X X X X X X student learning and program outcomes 6 .2 Aggregated evaluation findings inform program decisions 6.3 Evaluation findings are shared with X X X X communities of interest X X X X X X X X X X X X 6.5 program satisfaction X X X X 6.5 job placement X X X X 6.5.1licensure exam pass rate at or above national mean X X X X 6 .5.2 IeveIs of program completion reflect X X X X 6.4 Graduates demonstrate achievement to competencies appropriate to role preparation 6.5 performance on licensure exam 6.5 program completion program demographics, 10 3 RCCADNP Ongoing Systematic Evaluation Plan 2010-2013 academic progression and program history 6.5.3 Program satisfaction measures address graduates and employers 6.5.4 Job placement rates are addressed through quantified measures that reflect program demographics and history 6.6 Evidence of comparable program outcomes for all students—distance and on-campus Month Jan 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 4.1 6.1 6.2 x x x x March 2.8 2.9 2.10 6.1 6.2 x April 3.2 3.5 3.8 6.1 6.2 May Semester 1.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.6 3.7 4.4 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 x x x Feb 1.4 2.5 6.1 6.2 x August 4.1 4.2 4.5 6.1 6.2 x September 4.6 4.8 4.9 6.1 6.2 10 4 x October 3.3 3.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 6.2 November Odd/even year Even years: 3.1, 4.3 Odd years: 1.1, 4.7 x December Semester 1.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.6 3.7 4.4 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5/6.5.4 6.6
