IHS Electronics & Media Report Touch Screens Who would win the transparent conductive film market? October 2013 Irene Heo, Senior Analyst, +82 31 704 7188, Irene.heo@ihs.com © 2013 IHS D1DB-MT-S-02-2013 ihs.com Contents I. Touch panel market and industry trend 8 • 9 • 1. Report outline • 1.1. Research objective • 1.2. Research methodology 10 • 1.3. Research scope and definitions 11 9 2. Touch panel industry trends 12 • 2.1. Rising application of touch interface 12 • 2.2. Increasing penetration of touch technology 13 • 2.3. Touch panel technology and mechanism 14 • 2.4. Advent of capacitive touch market 16 • 2.5. Type and definition of capacitive touch panels 17 • 2.6. Capacitive touch panel application trends in major products 18 • 2.7. Changes in capacitive touch panel architecture of major applications 19 • 2.8. Pros and cons of capacitive touch panel by architecture: Overall 20 • 2.9. Pros and cons of capacitive touch panel by architecture: Small-sized applications 21 • 2.10. Pros and cons of capacitive touch panel by architecture: Mid-to-large size applications 23 • 2.11. Capacitive touch panel development directions: Overall 25 • 2.12. Capacitive touch panel development directions: Single layer solution 26 • 2.13. Capacitive touch panel development directions: In-cell/On-cell 28 • 2.14. Capacitive touch panel development directions: Possible approaches to polarizer integrated sensors 29 • 2.15. Hybrid products and their cannibalization 30 • 2.16. Trends in ITO alternatives 31 • 2.17. Release of flexible display: Samsung and LG to launch smartphones with curved screens using AMOLED in Q4-13 32 © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 2 Contents • 3. Touch panel market forecast 33 • 3.1. Classification of segments by application 33 • 3.2. Overall touch panel market forecast 34 • 3.3. Touch panel market forecast by technology 36 • 3.4. Touch panel market forecast by major application 38 • 3.5. Touch panel market share of major application 40 • 3.6. Resistive touch panel market forecast by application 41 • 3.7. Capacitive touch panel market forecast by application 43 • 3.8. Touch panel technology penetration trends 45 • 3.9. Capacitive touch panel market forecast by layer structure 47 • • Overview / Mobile phone / Tablet PC / Notebook PC / AIO PC / Overall 3.10. Capacitivetouchpanel“onefilmsolution”marketforecast • 55 Film sensor / Glass sensor II. Touch panel transparent conductive film industry 56 • 1. Types and characteristics of transparent conductive film 57 • 1.1. Types by material 57 • 1.2. Metal-based transparent conductive film types 59 • 1.3. Comparison of metal-based transparent conductive films 61 • 1.4. Classification by major process 62 • 1.5. Deposition methods 63 • 1.6. Patterning types 64 • 2. Characteristics of transparent conductive film 65 • 65 2.1. Resistance and transmittance / Resistance and screen size © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 3 Contents • • 2.2. Comparison of characteristics by application size 66 • 2.3. Overall comparison 67 3. Transparent conductive film application trends 68 • 3.1. Transparent conductive film application trends by major application 68 • 3.2. Touch sensor/transparent conductive film application trends by major brand 69 • • • • 3.3. Overall: Transparent conductive film application trends by application (Layer structure / major set maker) 74 4. Competition among transparent conductive films 75 • 4.1. Competition by major application 75 • 4.2. ITO film sensor production cost 77 • 4.3. Value chain of transparent conductive film and major manufacturers 79 5. Products and manufacturers of transparent conductive film 80 • 80 5.1. ITO film • • • 87 Toppan, LG Chem, Panasonic, Mirae Nanotech, LG innotek, O-fil, Uni-Pixel Displays, Mitsubishi Paper Mills Limited/ Fujifilm/ Atmel, Gunze, PolyIC, KETI, Toray, Kumho Electric 5.3. AgNW • • Nitto, Teijin Kasei, Sekisui, LG Chem, MAX Film, Miraestech, Hanwha L&C, Oike, Gunze, O-film, Others 5.2. Metal Mesh • 97 Hyosung, LGE, WIA Corporation, Others 5.4. Ag nano ink • • Samsung, LGE, Leonovo, Huawei, HP, Dell, Asus, Acer, Toshiba, Sony 99 Carestream, Cabrios, InTek 6. Issues with film sensor 101 • 6.1. Narrow bezel: Necessity 101 • 6.2. Necessity of narrow bezel: Bezel generating process and key features 102 © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 4 Contents • 6.3. Necessity of narrow bezel: Metal on ITO 103 • 6.4. One film sensor 104 • 6.5. Direct bonding with LCD cell is on the rise 105 • 6.6. Roll-to-roll photolithography patterning 107 • 6.7. Slim GFF for thin touch panel sensor 108 III. Touch panel transparent conductive film market 109 • • • 1. Transparent conductive film market forecast 110 • 1.1. Market calculation basis: Capacitive touch panel layer structure 110 • 1.2. Market calculation basis: Pros and cons of each touch layer structure 111 • 1.3. Index chart 112 • 1.4. Transparent conductive film market forecast 113 • 1.5. Transparent conductive film market forecast by technology 114 • 1.6. Transparent conductive film market forecast by application 116 • 1.7. Resistive touch panel-use transparent conductive film market forecast by application 120 • 1.8. Capacitive touch panel-use transparent conductive film market forecast by application 124 • 1.9. Non-ITO market forecast 128 • 1.10. Non-ITO film market forecast by application 130 2. ITO film production lines and capacity 132 • 2.1. Production line and capacity by major company 132 • 2.2. ITO film production capacity and market share 135 • 2.3. ITO film production capacity by region and its index chart 137 3. ITO film supply chain/market share/price trend 138 • 138 3.1. Supply chain between touch panel makers and ITO film makers © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 5 Contents • 3.2. ITO film supply chain: Samsung Electronics Co. 141 • 3.3. ITO film supply chain: Apple Inc. 142 • 3.4. ITO film supply chain: LG Electronics Inc. 143 • 3.5. ITO film supply chain: LG Display Co. 144 • 3.6. ITO film supply chain: Shenzhen O-film Tech Co. 145 • 3.7. ITO film supply chain: Other major touch panel makers 146 • 3.8. Market share of ITO film makers' supplies to touch panel makers 147 • 3.9. Market share by ITO film maker 148 • 3.10. ITO film price trend 149 IV. ITO glass market and industry trend 150 • • 1. ITO glass market forecast 151 • 1.1. ITO glass market forecast 151 • 1.2. ITO glass market forecast by application 152 • 1.3. ITO glass market forecast by technology 154 • 1.4. Resistive touch panel-use ITO glass market forecast 155 • 1.5. Capacitive touch panel-use ITO glass market forecast 158 • 1.6. Comparison of resistive-use ITO glass and transparent conductive film market 161 • 1.7. Comparison of capacitive-use ITO glass and transparent conductive film market 162 • 1.8. Proportion of ITO glass and transparent conductive film by major application 163 2. Production line and capacity of ITO glass sensor maker 164 • 2.1. Production line and capacity of major maker 164 • 2.2.Majormakers’productionlinebyregion 167 • 2.3. Trends in major manufacturers 169 © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 6 Contents • • AUO, Cando, CPT, HannsTouch, Innolux, Laibao, Micro Technology, Buwon Advanced Coating Technology, Others 3. Issues with ITO glass sensor 174 • 3.1. G2 structure 174 • 3.2. G1/G2 structure and manufacturing process 175 • 3.3. Comparison of sheet G2 and cell G2 176 • 3.4. Single layer ITO GG – GG1 177 • 3.5. Rising application of G2 sensors to notebook PC 178 • 3.6. Pros and cons of G2 in applications with 10-inch or larger screens 179 • 3.7. Cell G2 180 Appendix. ITO film technology outline 182 • 1. ITO film technology outline and requirements 183 • 1.1. ITO film structure and general manufacturing process 183 • 1.2. Characteristics of ITO film materials 184 • 1.3. ITO film types (crystal, amorphous)) 187 • 1.4. ITO film performance and assessment measures 188 • 1.5. Requirements for ITO film by technology 189 • 1.6. Touch panel ITO film technology – Touchpanel’srequirementsandsolutions 190 © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 7 I. Touch panel market and industry trend Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 ihs.com 1. Report outline 1.1. Research objective This year is a significant year for the touch panel market as adoption of ITO substitute film, or non ITO film materials (silver nanowire, copper mesh, silver mesh, silver halide, silver nano particle etc), has been examined and implemented in full scale. So far, touch panels were mostly used in devices with relatively small screens, such as smartphone, tablet PC, notebook PC, ATM, and car navigation system. So ITO film’s resistance wasn't a big problem. But recently, touch user interface (UI) began to be used in devices with larger screens, such as all-in-one (AIO) PC, electronic board, and large notebook PC. As the screen gets bigger data needs to be processed rises, so transparent electrode resistance has become very important. For now, indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most commonly used transparent conductive material. When using ITO, glass based ITO implements about 50-60 ohm resistance, while film-based ITO can implement around 100 ohm resistance given its mass productivity. When using ITO glass, which has lower resistance than ITO film, ITO glass can drive a touch panel up to the size of 20-30 inches. But it also has many weaknesses such as less room to adjust weight, thickness, and designs. It is fragile and less productive as it uses sheet unit process. Therefore, many attempts have been made to replace ITO glass. In particular, ITO substitute film has already been applied in large devices where ITO film, which has relatively higher resistance, can't be used. (In fact, it will be more correct to see this as a substitute product market for heavy, inconvenient ITO glass rather than a substitute market for ITO film.) In addition, indium is a rare metal that is expensive and limited in supply, so we can see this as a move to replace this material. SAMPLE www.ihs.com At the same time, touch panel price is falling rapidly and expectation for optical properties is improving. Touch panel companies are seeking to come up with plans to have better specifications and lower production costs. In this context, many changes are being made in capacitive touch structure. Previously, GG (cover glass + ITO glass sensor) type, mostly used for the Apple products or GFF (cover glass + two ITO film sensors) type accounted for most of the market. But now companies are using structures, which can improve production efficiency, lower production costs, and better optical properties or more favorable structures in terms of weight and thickness. In short, the representative structures, which can reduce ITO sensor layers, trim processes, while cutting costs and thickness are GG G1/G2, GFF GF2, GF1, G1F, in-cell, and on-cell. With these changes in the market, area demand of ITO film is likely to gradually slow its growth due to a rise in demand for non-ITO film and a change in layer structures. Also, ITO film price is expected to fall rapidly as China and some other countries are investing a large amount of money in ITO film production lines. This report analyzes and forecasts the overall transparent conductive film market, including ITO film and non-ITO film, not to mention issues in the touch panel market. It also provides clues on how to deal with the changes in the market going forward. ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 9 1.2. Research method • Data Collection Data used in this report was collected via various methods. First, basic data, which becomes the foundation of the analysis, was collected by direct information exchanges or researches through major industry supply chains. In addition, the latest information was obtained by steadily collecting related technology information and research trends through various methods such as industry and academic conferences, display related exhibitions, companies' earnings reports, analysis reports, press statements and searching the Internet. • Data Analysis The collected data has been analyzed under the methods of confirming the facts and correlating the information. We also made the analysis through diachronic/synchronic studies by using existing analysis data. In particular, past demand/supply conditions and technology comparisons have been using the industry forecasts and regular/irregular reports released by IHS Electronics & Media as the fundamental basis of analysis. SAMPLE www.ihs.com ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 10 1.3. Research scope and definitions * Research scope: Analysis on touch panel and ITO film/ITO glass related market, technology trend, industry trend, product trend, major end-products. * Research items: ITO sensor, touch panel, other related materials * Companies researched: Producers of above items and its raw materials * Research period: Q2-Q3 2013 * Long-term forecast: Market in 2012-2017 * Supply chain: as of the third quarter of 2013 * Units * Abbreviation and definitions of major terms SAMPLE - Ksqm: 1,000 square meters - Msqm: 1 million square meters - $ million: 1 million U.S. dollars - Yen: Japanese yen - S/M: Small and medium, 10 inch or smaller - ¥ million: 1 million yen - DSC: Digital still camera - Y/Y growth: Year-on-year growth - PMP: Portable multimedia player - CAGR: Compound annual growth rate - PND: Personal navigation device - PID: Public industry display - Game: Portable game device - DPF: Digital photo frame - AIO PC: All-in-one PC - TCF: Transparent conductive film - OCA: Optically clear adhesive - OCR: Optically clear resin www.ihs.com - AgNW: Silver nanowire ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 11 2. Touch panel industry trends 2.1. Increase of touch interface application • Touch technology is increasingly applied to all types of electronic devices used daily. • With projected capacitive touch sensors being applied as almost a standard on smartphones and other consumer electronics, capacitive touch technology is replacing other technologies on almost all touch-sensor applications. Touch everywhere SAMPLE www.ihs.com Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 12 2.2. Increase in application of touch technology • Most display devices require touch features, and therefore the application of the technology is increasing each year. Among such applications, some products like tablet PCs or GPS navigation systems cannot function at all without touch technology. Forecast of touch technology’s penetration rate 100% 90% 80% 70% SAMPLE 60% 50% www.ihs.com 40% 30% 20% 10% 2012 Source: IHS 2013(e) Tablet PC PND PMP Portable Game Device Portable DVD Player Portable Computer Notebook PC Mobile Phone LCD Monitor Industrial/Financial e-Book Reader DSC Digital Signage DPF Camcorder Automotive AIO PC 0% 2017(f) © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 13 2.6. Capacitive touch panel application trends in major products • The market initially started with the glass types (GG, DITO) and film types (GFF), but currently there are more than 10 types of touch panels with different layer structures. • Each method has its pros and cons according to the technology, production cost, client preference, and the situation of each developer. Projected capacitive touch layer types and major products of each type SAMPLE Start point Source: IHS Start point www.ihs.com © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 14 • In terms of cost and performance, G2 (sheet) layer structure has the most competitive features, whereas GG has some drawbacks in weight and thickness. Pros and cons of capacitive touch layers – Tablet PC/notebook PC (Mid-to-large size applications) GG GFF On-Cell (AMOLED) In-Cell (LCD) G2 (Sheet) G2 (Cell) G1F G1 GF2 (DITO) GF1 Cost Factors Sum Performance Factors Sum Source: IHS © 2013 IHS Pros and cons of capacitive touch layers – Tablet PC/notebook PC (Mid-to-large size applications) Mass Production (Medium~Large size) 3.0 SAMPLE 2.5 Narrow Bezel www.ihs.com 2.0 Yield Rate GG 1.5 GFF 1.0 0.5 Multi Touch - Cost G2 (Sheet) G2 (Cell) G1F Strength Source: IHS Thin and Light Optical GF2 (DITO) © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 15 2.12. Capacitive touch panel development directions: Single layer solution • The single layer type touch (GF1, G1, GG1) architecture is cheaper than the existing two layer types, and is increasingly being applied along with the expansion of the low cost smartphone market . • Along with cutting back on the cost of materials and the less complex process, allowing for higher yield rates, low cost manufacturing is possible. • As for GF1 type, the overall thickness of the panel can be reduced along with the elimination of one ITO film, and if used with a plastic cover befitting its nature of a low cost panel, the cost can be further lowered. (But when using plastic covers, a thicker cover must be used compared to glass to prevent warping). • The multi-touch feature is limited, and whereas the two layer type has a standard of 10 points, single layer types is divided into one, two, and five points. (Selectively applicable depending on the single layer sensor pattern structure and controller IC.) • Because of limited multi-touch and narrow bezel features, single layer structures are mostly used for smartphone sizes. SAMPLE Advantages of one layer type solution over two layer type: Simpler process and lower cost Double ITO Layers – G2 Source: IHS www.ihs.com Single ITO Layer – G1 4~5 Layers by photo processes Single layer photo process image Image Double ITO Layers – GFF Single ITO Layer – GF1 Double ITO films Single ITO film and plastic cover image image © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 16 2.14. Capacitive touch panel development directions: Possible approaches to polarizer integrated sensors • Polarizer is a multi-layer film. Another hybrid touch layer approach – ITO integrated polarizer: Layer approaches and thickness reduction GFF to LCD SAMPLE Possible approaches Polarizer integrated sensor to LCD www.ihs.com Possible approaches Polarizer integrated sensor to AMOLED Cover Window OCA/OCR ITO Film OCA ITO Film OCA/OCR Polarizer image CF TFT Polarizer Source: IHS Application with normal cover glass Application with G1 cover glass © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 17 3. Touch panel market forecast 3.1. Classification of segments by application Classification of segments by application Category Segment Application Mobile Phone Tablet PC Camcorder Digital Still Camera (DSC) Personal e-Book Reader Portable Multimedia Player (PMP) SAMPLE S/M* www.ihs.com Portable Game Device Portable DVD Player Digital Photo Frame Portable Navigation Device (PND) Car Application Automotive Financial Public / Industrial PDA Others S/M Others Personal Notebook PC LCD Monitor Home/Office Large AIO PC Public / Industrial Digital Signage Others Large Others *S/M: Small and Medium, 10 inches or smaller. Yet, every tablet PC is categorized under S/M. Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 18 3.2. Overall touch panel market forecast: Revenue, 2012-2017 • In 2013 the touch panel market size is expected to post $18 billion, up 11.5% from the previous year. • The five-year CAGR from 2012 to 2017 is forecast to be 9.1%. Overall touch panel market forecast ($ million) 30,000 50% 45% 25,000 40% 35% 20,000 30% 15,000 25% 20% SAMPLE 10,000 5,000 15% 10% www.ihs.com 5% 0 0% 2012 2013 2014 Revenue 2015 2016 2017 Y/Y Growth Source: IHS © 2013 IHS Overall touch panel market forecast ($ million) 2012 Revenue Y/Y Growth Source: IHS 18,054 47.3% 2013 20,125 11.5% 2014 23,282 15.7% 2015 25,586 9.9% 2016 27,591 7.8% 2017 27,960 CAGR 9.1% 1.3% © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 19 3.8. Capacitive touch panel market forecast by layer structure: Overall, 2012-2017 • Film types include GFF, GF1, and GF2, whereas glass types include GG, G2, and G1. Hybrid refers to G1F, and embedded types are in-cell and on-cell. • Film types are forecast to post the steepest growth, and glass types are also expected to show a steady growth centering on embedded types and cover integrated types. Capacitive touch panel market forecast by layer structure (Ksqm) Capacitive touch panel market forecast by layer structure (%) 100% 18,000 90% 16,000 80% 14,000 SAMPLE 12,000 www.ihs.com 10,000 70% 60% 50% 8,000 40% 6,000 4,000 20% 2,000 10% 0 Film Sensor Glass Sensor Hybrid Sensor Embedded Sensor Source: IHS 30% 0% 2012 3,079 4,331 2013 6,561 3,366 2014 9,690 3,764 2015 12,247 4,786 2016 14,821 5,380 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 16,543 Embedded Sensor 12% 17% 20% 20% 21% 21% 5,808 Hybrid Sensor 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 51% 27% 22% 22% 21% 20% 36% 54% 57% 57% 57% 57% 2017 77 191 281 364 389 417 Glss Sensor 1,062 2,139 3,338 4,252 5,333 6,205 Film Sensor © 2013 IHS Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 20 II. Touch panel transparent conductive film industry Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 ihs.com 1.2. Metal-based transparent conductive film types Metal-based transparent conductive film types – by material Silver series Ag Nanowire Ag Halide (Film developing) Ag Mesh (Direct Printing) Source: IHS Resistance range: Advantages: Disadvantages: Target applications: Price: Major players: Resistance range: Advantages: www.ihs.com Disadvantages: Target applications: Price: Major players: Resistance range: Transmittance: Advantages: Disadvantages: Target applications: Major players: SAMPLE © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 22 1.3. Comparison of metal-based transparent conductive film Metal-based transparent conductive film types – Overall Resistance(Ω) Ag Nanowire Ag Halide Cu Mesh Ag (Direct Printing) ITO 30~50Ω 60Ω 0.1~0.5Ω 60Ω 80Ω or higher Transmittance(%) Merit Demerit Flexibility Method of securing pattern visibility SAMPLE www.ihs.com Layer Type Price (ITO sensor: 1) Target Application Major Supplier Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 23 2. Characteristics of transparent conductive film 2.1. Resistance and transmittance / Resistance and screen size • The correlation between surface resistance and transmittance of each material. • Generally, the resistance can be lowered with a thick deposition, but on the other hand this will lower transmittance. Because of such correlations, the biggest challenge for transparent electrode film is to deposit a thin layer whilst keeping the resistance at a steady low level. Transparent conductive film comparison: Resistance and transmittance Transparent conductive film comparison: Resistance and screen size SAMPLE www.ihs.com Source: IHS © 2013 IHS Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 24 2.3. Overall comparison • Comparison of features without distinguishing size • Cu mesh is superior in resistance and transmittance, AgNW in flexibility and transmittance, and Ag halide in cost, thickness and flexibility. • Each material has its own characteristics, therefore can also be divided into optimal applications. Comparison of transparent conductive film Resistance(Ω) 5 4 Process efficency (Cost) 3 2 1 Transmittance (%) SAMPLE www.ihs.com 0 Thickness Pattern Visibility ITO Film Cu Mesh Ag Mesh Ag Halide AgNW Flexibility Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 25 3.2. Touch sensor/transparent conductive film application trends by major brand Sensor application trends by major set maker - Samsung Smart Phone Tablet PC Notebook PC AIO PC Major Player ITO Film ITO G2 Ag Halide Ag Mesh Cu Mesh AgNW SAMPLE Source: IHS © 2013 IHS www.ihs.com Sensor application trends by major set maker - LGE Smart Phone Tablet PC Notebook PC AIO PC Major Player ITO Film ITO G2 Ag Halide Ag Mesh Cu Mesh AgNW Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 26 ITO film sensor production cost structure estimates ($) 4” 7” Materials GFF GF1 GFF GF2 GF1 ITO Paste OCA Others Yield Cost Indirect cost Margin SAMPLE ASP Notes: GFF architecture is cover glass/OCA/ITO film/OCA ITO film. Sensor production cost includes two patterned ITO films and OCA for cover bonding. GF1 and GF2 architecture is cover glass/OCA/ITO film. Sensor production cost includes a patterned ITO film and OCA for cover bonding. Source: IHS www.ihs.com Cost rate for 7” GFF sensor 9% © 2013 IHS Cost rate for 7” GF2 sensor 9% 7% Cost rate for 7” GF1 sensor 7% 3% 14% 4% 4% 10% 5% 52% 14% 56% 60% 13% 14% 10% ITO Film Source: IHS Paste 9% OCA Others Indirect cost Margin © 2013 IHS ITO Film Source: IHS Paste OCA Others Indirect cost Margin © 2013 IHS ITO Film Source: IHS Paste OCA Others Indirect cost Margin © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 27 5. Products and manufacturers of transparent conductive film 5.1. ITO Film Nitto Denko Corp. • Nitto Denko, which has a high-tech technology in the adhesive sector, holds the largest share in the market for polarizer, a key component of LCD. It is leading the market for various optical films, such as anti-reflective, adhesive, and PET. • It is also leading the ITO film sector. Its films are applied in high-end products, such as mobile phones. Its products are well recognized in the industry and even some set makers specifically suggests using the Nitto films. • The company’s representative ITO film has a double layer structure, which uses two sheets of PET films. This is recognized as the optimized solution for ITO film, with such advantages as stronger durability, cushioning effect (resistive), and no traces of etching, compared to other companies' products. • It has the industry's top production capacity (Currently, annual production capacity is expected to reach 12 million square meters (Msqm).) • It has the industry's top productivity by outsourcing HC and index matching film production while it just sputters only ITO films. • A new production line is slated to start operation. The new line can engage in the production of wide films, so production capacity www.ihs.com is expected to more than double in 2014. SAMPLE Product specifications Elecrysta, ITO film by Nitto Denko V270 V150 V100 Sheet Resistance (Ω /ㅁ) 270 140 100 PET Film Transmittance (%) >90 >90 >90 Adhesive Back Coating Hue b 1.4 1.4 1.4 Reflectance difference (%) 0.3~1.0 0.8 0.8 Clear HC PET Film Source: IHS Under Coating 1(IM) Under Coating 2(IM) ITO Source: IHS © 2013 IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 28 III. Touch panel transparent conductive film market Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 ihs.com 1. Transparent conductive film market forecast 1.1. Market calculation basis: Capacitive touch panel layer structure • Theoretically, fewer layers mean better optical properties, lower raw material costs, and higher yield rates through fewer processes. • But in reality, window integrated technologies are very difficult to realize. They cause problems such as low yield and high costs. • Currently, we are in the process of solving these technical problems one at a time Touch layer structures and development direction SAMPLE www.ihs.com Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 30 1.2. Index chart • To calculate the actual demand for transparent conductive films, factors such as the number of films used, yield rates, and cutting efficiency have to be applied differently by touch layer structure and year. • In this page, an index chart was made by dividing the overall transparent conductive film demand area by the film sensor touch area. • Transparent conductive film demand in 2013 is forecast to be about three times the touch panel area. • But this value is expected to continue to fall as the touch panel production yield continues to rise and application of one layer sensors continue to increase. Graphchart Index title : ITO demand vs. film sensor touch area by application Index Graphchart title : ITO demand vs. film sensor touch area 3.4 8.0 3.3 7.0 SAMPLE 6.0 3.2 5.0 3.1 www.ihs.com 3.0 4.0 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.0 2.7 1.0 0.0 2.6 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2017 AIO PC TCF demand logic (TCF demand/Film sensor touch demadn) Source: IHS © 2013 IHS Source: IHS 2013 2014 Mobile Phone 2015 Notebook PC 2016 2017 Tablet PC © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 31 1.3. Transparent conductive film market forecast: Revenue/Area, 2012–2017 • In 2013, transparent conductive film market is forecast to record ¥86.6 billion in value and 23.6 Msqm in terms of area. • The market's value is expected to drop gradually along with the fall in film prices and emergence of one film solution (GF2, GF1). • By area, the market is expected to exceed 50.4 Msqm in 2017. Overall transparent conductive film market forecast (¥ million) Overall transparent conductive film market forecast (Ksqm) 140,000 60% 120,000 50% 60,000 80% 70% SAMPLE 100,000 50,000 60% 40% www.ihs.com 80,000 30% 60,000 20% 40,000 10% 40,000 50% 30,000 40% 30% 20,000 20% 20,000 10,000 0% 10% 0 Revenue Y/Y Growth 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 55,482 86,632 110,226 120,162 126,999 125,580 9.3% 56.1% 27.2% 9.0% 5.7% -1.1% transparent conductive film: Transparent Conductive Film Source: IHS -10% © 2013 IHS 0 Source: IHS 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Area 13,775 23,605 31,673 38,224 45,018 50,383 Y/Y Growth 65.6% 71.4% 34.2% 20.7% 17.8% 11.9% 0% © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 32 2. ITO film production lines and capacity 2.1. Production line status and production capacity by major company ITO film production line status and capacity (1) Nation Company Region Equipment # Width(mm) Manufacture Type Capacity (10K/Mon) Capacity (10K/Year) Note SKC Hass Hanwha L&C Toray AMK Hansung SAMPLE www.ihs.com South Korea Miraestech MAX Film LG Chem LG Hausys Mirae INT Plaworks Digitech Systems ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 33 2.2. ITO film production capacity and market share • Ofthetransparentconductivefilm,ITOfilm’sproductioncapacityispredicted. • Total production capacity in 2013 is expected to reach 34.3 Msqm thanks to capacity expansions in China. In 2015, production capacity is expected to reach 59 Msqm. ITO film capacity forecast by manufacturer (Ksqm) ITO film capacity forecast by manufacturer (Ksqm) Graph title 70,000 Manufacturer 90% 60,000 70% 50,000 50% 30% 30,000 10% www.ihs.com 20,000 -10% 10,000 Capacity Y/Y Growth Source: IHS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 15000 23,460 34,260 58,956 58,956 16% 56% 46% 72% 0% -30% © 2013 IHS Source: IHS © 2013 IHS 2013 2014 SAMPLE 40,000 0 2012 Nitto Oike MAX Junhong Ofilm Hanwha L&C MiraeStech Hansung Teijin Kasei Suzutora EFUN BETA(Gamma) CGS LGC LGH DNP Toray AMK Join Well Ushine Mirae INT Cheeshin Wanshun Biel KDX Total © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 34 3. ITO film supply chain/market share/price trend 3.1. Touch panel maker and ITO film maker's supply chain Supply chain of touch panel and ITO film manufacturers Touch panel maker Touch Type Structure ITO Film supplier Note Upper ITO Film) Nitto F/F Type Resistive Type Bottom ITO Film) Sekisui, Oike, etc YFO Mobile Phone, Navigation, Tablet PC, DSC Capacitive Type F/G Type Local ITO Film Maker GFF, G1F, GF1, G2, GF2(Developing) Nitto , Sekisui, Oike) Upper ITO Film) Nitto F/F Type Bottom ITO Film) Sekisui, etc Resistive Type F/P Type: Nintendo Nissha Upper ITO Film) Nitto F/P Type SAMPLE Bottom ITO PC) Teijin Capacitive Type GFF, GF2(COP) Nitto Mobile Phone, Tablet PC(Apple) Upper ITO Film) Nitto, Oike, Sekisui Mobile Phone Bottom ITO Film) Nitto, Oike, Sekisui Tablet PC (Galaxy Tab) www.ihs.com F/F Type Resistive Type J Touch F/G Type Small quantity GFF, GF1 Capacitive Type Nitto, Oike GG,G1F Taoyuan(Taiwan) capa. 6,000K/month, Hunan (China) 6,000K/month ITO COP: Sony Chemical Sony Chemical Capacitive Type F/F Type Camera etc. ITO Film: Nitto, Oike, Teijin Chemical Resistive Type F/F Type Nitto, Sekisui Capacitive Type GF2(SITO), GF1, GFF Nitto Resistive Type F/F, F/G Upper ITO Film) Nitto, Bottom ITO Film) Suzutora ALPS Electric EELY Mobile Phone (for Europe, Japan) Mobile Phone Navigation ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 35 3.2. ITO film supply chain: Samsung Electronics Co. • In the smartphone sector, Samsung Electronics has been mainly employing active matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED) panels, using on-cell touch AMOLED (OCTA) for its high-end models (e.g.: the Galaxy S4 and the Galaxy Note3). Its various lower priced LCD models use GFF touch panels. • Samsung mainly gets film-type touch panels from Nitto Denko. It partially gets supplies from Max Film Corp. and LG Chem. • Samsung holds the biggest market share in the global smartphone market. In the tablet PC market, it holds the second largest share after Apple Inc. but in the PC sector, its presence isn't noticeable yet. For the AIO PCs using touch panels, it mainly applies non-ITO films, such as Ag printing film or silver chloride. ITO film supply chain of Samsung Electronics Select SAMPLE Samsung www.ihs.com Transparent Conductive Film Touch Panel Makers (…) Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 36 3.8. Market share of ITO film makers' supplies to touch panel makers • Nitto Denko supplies 70% of its products to Samsung and Apple. OIKE supplies 53% of its products to O-Film, 27% to LG, and the remainder to China and Taiwan's local companies. • LG Chem is supplying products to O-Film and LG Chem. It expects sales to increase from next year as it recently became as a related company of Samsung. Hanwha L&C Co. has entered the market late, but it is fully operating its lines thanks to its supplies to O-Film and Top Touch Electronics Co. It is preparing to start operaing a new production line next year. ITO film maker's supply share by touch panel maker (2013) Hanwha L&C SAMPLE 40% Junhong 15% LG Chem 35% www.ihs.com 50% 10% 8% 42% Oike 25% 8% 42% 53% Nitto 27% 50% 0% 10% Samsung 30% 20% Nissha 20% 30% O-film 40% LG 50% Truly, EELY 60% 10% 17% 70% Each, Top touch 80% Gunze 10% 3% 3% 90% 7% 100% Others Note: Samsung mostly gets supplies from Nitto Denko, so no other touch panel makers were included here. Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 37 3.10. ITO film price trend • ITO film price is estimated to be about ¥3,300 in 2013. The price is expected to fall continuously amid production expansions by ITO makers and under price pressure. • For reference, GF2-type DITO (double-sided ITO) is estimated to be about 1.5 times more expensive, while the price of COP (cyclic olefin polymer) base DITO- type ITO film by Nitto Denko, used by Apple, is estimated to be more than three times pricier. ITO film price trend (¥/sqm) 6,000 5,000 SAMPLE 4,000 www.ihs.com 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Capacitive touch ITO film 5,600 4,000 3,300 2,850 2,560 2,304 2,100 Resistive touch ITO film 3,354 2,851 2,566 2,400 2,280 2,180 1,899 Notes: Capacitive touch ITO film price is based on GFF-type film of Nitto Denko. Resistive touch ITO film price is based on FF-type film used in mobile phones. Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 38 IV. ITO glass market and industry trend Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 ihs.com 1.2. ITO glass market forecast by application: Area, 2012–2017 • The ITO glass market for mobile phone is expected to reach about 3 Msqm, making up 29% of the total. • This is followed by the market for tablet PC, which will reach 2.1 Msqm in demand, accounting for 20%, and that for notebook PC, demand is estimated at 1.5 Msqm, or 15%. • The market for tablet PC-use controlled 45% of the entire demand in 2012 as some of the Apple iPad adopted GG type until 2013. ITO glass market forecast by application (Ksqm) ITO glass market share by application (%) 18,000 100% 16,000 90% 14,000 80% SAMPLE 12,000 10,000 www.ihs.com 8,000 70% 60% 50% 40% 6,000 30% 4,000 20% 2,000 0 10% 0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Others 2,468 1,851 1,997 2,097 2,162 2,302 Others 19% 18% 16% 14% 14% 14% AIO PC 568 849 883 1,020 1,353 1,646 AIO PC 4% 8% 7% 7% 9% 10% LCD Monitor 454 1,040 1,454 2,014 1,708 1,674 LCD Monitor 4% 10% 12% 14% 11% 10% Notebook PC 565 1,523 2,367 3,098 2,953 3,320 Notebook 4% 15% 19% 21% 19% 19% Tablet PC 5,709 2,103 1,661 1,947 2,308 2,609 Tablet PC 45% 20% 14% 13% 15% 15% Mobile Phone 2,964 2,989 3,840 4,551 5,054 5,479 Mobile Phone 23% 29% 31% 31% 33% 32% Source: IHS © 2013 IHS Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 40 1.8. Proportion of ITO glass and transparent conductive film by major application Graph title Tablet PC Graph Mobiletitle phone 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 38% 30% 31% 32% 31% 32% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 30% 62% 70% 69% 68% 69% 68% 10% 10% 2013 2014 TCF 2015 2016 2017 80% 70% 60% 27% 64% 30% 72% 73% 73% TCF 2015 2016 2017 31% 2013 2014 2015 2016 SAMPLE Source: IHS 2017 2012 ITO Glass www.ihs.com 90% 23% 80% TCF © 2013 IHS Source: IHS ITO Glass © 2013 IHS 16% 43% 65% 100% 94% 40% 77% 30% 84% 57% 35% 10% 15% 0% 0% Source: IHS 2014 40% 20% 20% 39% 2012 2013 50% 85% 0% 2012 50% 40% 10% 53% 62% 48% 59% 45% 69% 60% 85% 50% 20% 47% 38% 52% 41% 55% 30% 70% 61% 87% 0% 100% 27% 89% 10% 100% 28% 90% 47% Graph title Monitor 36% 90% 70% 84% Graph AIO PCtitle 90% 15% 80% TCF © 2013 IHS 100% 13% 60% ITO Glass Source: IHS 11% 30% 20% 2012 10% 53% 40% 20% 0% 16% 80% 70% 40% Graph titlePC Notebook 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 0% 2012 TCF ITO Glass © 2013 IHS Source: IHS 6% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ITO Glass © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 41 2. Production line and capacity of ITO glass sensor makers 2.1. Production line and capacity of major makers Production line and capacitive of major makers Maker Gen. Size Location 2013 (K/Month) Note TPK Cando SAMPLE www.ihs.com Wintek HannsTouch AUO Innolux ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 42 2.3. Trends in major manufacturers AU Optronics Corp. • Its touch panel business kicked into high gear in 2013 as its strategy to bundle sales of LCD and touch panels gained support from its clients. • In particular, with the launch of the eTP, a G2 touch panel with narrow bezel, standard type notebook PC, applied to its own LCD panel in the second quarter of 2013, its touch panel shipments also surged. If the eTP and LCD panel are purchased together, AUO will provide them for 20-30% cheaper than other products. • AUO is focusing on G2 touch panel for notebook PC and tablet PC in the touch panel business. It plans to mass produce on-cell and cell G2 type for smartphones in the fourth quarter of 2013. • In addition, AUO plans to mass produce on-cell type for tablet PC as early as the first half of 2014 and that for notebook PC in the second half of next year. The company is trying hard to increase its competitiveness in its core LCD business by integrating it with the touch panel segment. • Currently, it is producing touch sensors by partially modifying some of 5G and 4.5G LCD production lines. Monthly capacity of 5G www.ihs.com line is 70 K and that of 4.5G line is about 50 K. (Module processing lines are located in Xiamen, China.) SAMPLE AUO eTP Source: AUO AUO eTP specifications © 2013 IHS Source: AUO © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 43 Appendix. ITO film technology outline Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 ihs.com 1. ITO film technology and requirements 1.1. ITO film structure and general manufacturing process • Various films with different functions are laminated together to comprise the ITO film • ITO films can be classified into resistive touch and capacitive touch types • Capacitive touch type ITO film requirements: low resistance, etching technology • Resistive touch type ITO film requirements: durability, high transmittance, low cost Manufacturing Process of ITO Film Structure of ITO Film Clear HC PET Film SAMPLE Anti Newton’sring Under Coating (IM) ITO Source: IHS www.ihs.com Clear HC Primer Layer 3~7um 0.05~0.5um PET Film 50~188um Primer Layer Anchor coat Layer ITO Layer 0.05~0.5um 3~7um 0.01~0.05um © 2013 IHS Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 45 1.6. Touch panel ITO film technology – Touch panel’s requirements and solution Touch panel development/requirement points SAMPLE www.ihs.com Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 46 Requirements for capacitive-type ITO film SAMPLE www.ihs.com Source: IHS © 2013 IHS ► Table of contents © 2013 IHS Report | Touch Panel-use Transparent Conductive Film Report - 2013 47 For further information, please contact IHS Customer Care, +1 800 447 2273, +44 (0) 1344 328 300, CustomerCare@ihs.com Formerly: iSuppli, Screen Digest, Displaybank, and IMS Research © 2013 IHS. No portion of this report may be reproduced, reused, or otherwise distributed in any form without prior written consent, with the exception of any internal client distribution as may be permitted in the license agreement between client and IHS. Content reproduced or redistributed with IHS permission must display IHS legal notices and attributions of authorship. The information contained herein is from sources considered reliable but its accuracy and completeness are not warranted, nor are the opinions and analyses which are based upon it, and to the extent permitted by law, IHS shall not be liable for any errors or omissions or any loss, damage or expense incurred by reliance on information or any statement contained herein. For more information, please contact IHS at customercare@ihs.com, +1 800 IHS CARE (from North American locations), or +44 (0) 1344 328 300 (from outside North America). All products, company names or other marks appearing in this publication are the trademarks and property of IHS or their respective owners.