BIOCATALYTIC CONVERSION OF SHORT CHAIN FATTY ACIDS TO ALCOHOLS VIA SYNGAS FERMENTATION Hanno Richter, PhD Angenent Lab Biological and Environmental Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY hr95@cornell.edu SunGrant Initiative 2012 National Conference New Orleans, LA, October 3, 2012 Carboxylic acid Solventogenic clostridia Energy + electrons Alcohol Talk Outline 1) Why carboxylic acids as substrates for biofuels: The carboxylate platform in the Angenent lab 2) Biochemical conversion with energy and electrons from sugar: Advantages and disadvantages 3) Biochemical conversion with syngas: Achievements and challenges http://angenent.bee.cornell.edu/ Carboxylate platform : Conversion of biomass into short chain fatty acids Lignocellulose Carboxylic Acids Agler et. al. (2012). Environmental Science & Technology 46: 10229-10238 Carboxylate platform : n-butyric acid as the main product from corn stover Agler et. al. (2012). Environmental Science & Technology 46: 10229-10238 Carboxylate platform : Caproic acid production from corn beer Agler et. al. (2012). Energy & Environmental Science. DOI: 10.1039/c2ee22101b Carboxylate platform : Caproic acid production from corn beer Agler et. al. (2012). Energy & Environmental Science. DOI: 10.1039/c2ee22101b Conversion of biomass into alcohols via carboxylic acids with solventogenic clostridia Energy, electrons Lignocellulose N-butyric Acid Carboxylate platform N-butanol ABE fermentation 2-stage continuous culture with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum for conversion of n-butyric acid into n-butanol Gas pump pump n-butyric acid pH auxostat pump Reservoir: Medium + glucose pump Stage 1: Growth, Acidogenesis pump Stage 2: Solventogenesis Condensor, Concentrated solvents Richter et. al. (2012). Biotechnology and Bioengineering 109 (4); 913-921 Effluent, Solvents depleted Complete bench scale setup for conversion of n-butyric acid into n-butanol with glucose Richter et. al. (2012). Biotechnology and Bioengineering 109 (4); 913-921 System produces butanol at good rates Stage 1, growth Separating funnel Stage 2, production Condenser Product: 0.25 L per day (33 g butanol/L) Large amounts of glucose required for conversion of n-butyric acid into n-butanol Î Costly ! Richter et. al. (2012). Biotechnology and Bioengineering 109 (4); 913-921 Substrates Products Glucose n-butyrate n-butanol acetone ethanol acetate rates (g/(L*h)) 1.39 0.23 0.39 0.20 0.02 0.01 Molar ratios 3.0 1.1 2.2 1.4 0.2 0.1 Problem: formation of fermentation byproducts. Theoretical ratio of butyrate : glucose consumed = 2:1 Achieved: only 1:3 There is a need for a more economic/efficient source of electrons and energy for carboxylate to alcohol conversion, without mandatory formation of energy-dense byproducts …Î syngas Syngas as a source of energy and electrons Gasification Syngas (CO, H2, CO2) CO2 Lignocellulose N-butyric Acid Carboxylate platform N-butanol Solventogenic Clostridium Theoretically possible: Consumption of two mol CO per one mol n-butyric acid. Note that no byproducts have to be formed 2 CO + 2 H2O 2 CO2 0.5 ATP 2 Reduced ferredoxin 1 oxidized ferredoxin 1 NADH2 R-COOH Carboxylic acid R-COH Aldehyde 1 oxidized ferredoxin R-CH2OH Alcohol Schematic: Syngas fermentation in batch cultures Perez, J.M., Richter, H., Loftus, S.E., Angenent, L.T. Biocatalytic reduction of short-chain carboxylic acids into their corresponding alcohols with syngas fermentation. Submitted to Biotechnology and Bioengineering in August 2012, revision in progress. Syngas fermentation in the lab Reduction of n-butyric acid with syngas and C. ljungdahlii ERI-2 fed with 15 mM n-butyric acid* ● butyrate □ acetate ● butanol ▪ ethanol 100 200 300 Time (h) 400 Perez et. al. (2012) Submitted to Biotechnology and Bioengineering. - Conversion ability spread among carboxidotrophs - Broad range of carboxylates; longer side-chain more toxic, but also facilitates product stripping Perez et. al. (2012) Submitted to Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Closed system (batch serum bottles) - Quantitative conversion of n-butyric acid into n-butanol achieved. - Unfavorable Substrate: product ratio - Formation of byproducts - this system was not optimized for efficient reduction of n-butyric acid. 1 n-butyric acid + 67 CO + 20 H2 1 n-butanol + 10 ethanol + 1 acetic acid + 47 CO2 + 4 Cell carbon Increasing the process Efficiency: Continuous 2-stage syngas fermentation -Separated cell growth and alcohol production -Improved mass transfer -Continuous feed of nutrients and removal of products, while retaining biocatalyst -improved ethanol: acetate ratio through media optimization Richter, H., Martin, M.E., Angenent, L.T. (2012). Submitted for publication in SunGrant conference proceedings . Continuous 2-stage syngas fermentation in our lab Parameters for fermentation in stage 2, normalized to 1L reactor volume Rates of mMol/(L*min) g/(L*h) CO in 0.808 1.357 CO out 0.110 0.185 CO consumption 0.698 1.172 H2 in 0.471 0.057 H2 out 0.085 0.010 H2 consumption 0.386 0.046 CO2 in 0.067 0.177 CO2 out 0.371 0.979 CO2 production 0.304 0.803 Ethanol production 0.136 0.375 Acetic acid production 0.025 0.090 Ca. 10% of the productivity of yeast in sugar fermentation Parameters for fermentation in stage 2, normalized to 1L reactor volume Species Concentration exiting stage 2 CO (g) 19 vol% H2 (g) 14 vol% CO2 (g) 63 vol% Ethanol (l) 428 mM 19.7 g/L Acetic acid (l) 143 mM 8.6 g/L Efficiency (%) Stage 2 CO consumption 86 H2 consumption 82 CO recovery in etOH 28 H2 recovery in etOH 74 Economic disadvantage of synthetic growth medium* Component Cost per L Medium MES (buffer) $5.18 Mineral solution $0.53 Yeast Extract $0.17 L-cysteine $0.03 Trace metal solution $0.01 Vitamin solution $0.01 Total $5.83 We are currently developing an alternative growth medium that does not contain the major cost factors (MES, Mineral solution, yeast extract). First results are promising (next slide) * For composition of synthetic medium see: Datar et Al (2004). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol 86, No. 5, 587-594 Batch cultures with alternative medium sparged with syngas Upcoming: Scale-up to pilot plant for the Cornell village-Scale Pyrolysis Project http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/village_pyrolysis/index.html distillation Stage 2 Stage 1 media storage tank compressor Gas purification Summary Carboxylic acids can be produced from lignocellulose and organic waste materials using anaerobic digester technology. Biochemical conversion into alcohols with bacteria is feasible. Conversion into alcohols requires electrons and energy. Sugar can deliver these, but un-efficient, due to formation of undesired byproducts by solventogenic clostridia. Syngas can also be an energy and electron source . Although byproduct formation is not mandatory, acetate and ethanol are produced. The conversion process is currently being optimized towards - more efficient use of syngas (mass transfer) - higher product concentration, yields, rates of formation) - minimizing byproducts - reducing operational costs (growth medium). Acknowledgements Angenent Lab USDA collaborators Lars T. Angenent Sarah E. Loftus Michael E. Martin Michael Cotta Nasib Qureshi Bruce Dien Cornell Village Scale Pyrolysis Project Jose M. Perez Viktor Hällman Sebastian Heger Matthew T. Agler Funding SunGrant; USDA NIFA; Yossie Hollander Hyung Mo Kang Divya Vasudevan Matt Williams End Following: supplementary slides Results for production stage (2) of cont. syngas fermentation Theoretical co-fermentation of glucose/butyrate by C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum 0.5 Glucose 0.5 Acetone + 1.5 CO2 1 NADH2 1 ATP 1 R-COOH Carboxylic acid 1 R-CO-O-P 1 R-CO-S-CoA 1 NADH2 1 R-COH 1 R-CH2OH Alcohol 1 HS-CoA 1 HS-CoA Comparison of lignocellulose to ethanol technologies Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose and sugar fermentation Gasification of lignocellulose and syngas fermentation Energy and/or chemicals required for pretreatment Energy required for gasification, (consumes part of the substrate) Necessary removal of toxic byproducts from pretreatment (furfural etc.) Necessary removal of toxic byproducts from pyrolysis Requires enzymes for hydrolysis of (hemi) cellulose into sugars (costly) No additional conversion of product required Only (hemi-) cellulose moiety converted into substrate All biomass can be converted into substrate Theoretical ethanol yields* Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose and sugar fermentation Gasification of lignocellulose and syngas fermentation 0.51 g ethanol / g sugar * 0.27-41 g ethanol / g CO *, depending on hydrogen content 0.26 g ethanol / g biomass Assuming 50 wt% Biomass carbon recovered in sugar 0.19-0.29 g ethanol / g biomass, depending on hydrogen content, Assuming 70 wt% Biomass carbon recovered in CO** * Calculated from sugar or CO yields from lignocellulosic biomass and fermentation stoichiometries ** http://www.treepower.org/fuels/biomasssyngas.html HMI International. Data derived from a fixed bed updraft gasifier design. Composition of lignocellulose DoKyoung Lee et al. (2007). SunGrant report. http://ncsungrant.sdstate.org/uploads/publications/SGINC1-07.pdf Composition of syngas from biomass gasification 24.0% Carbon monoxide (CO) = 73% of total carbon in biomass 18.0% Hydrogen (H2) 6.0% Carbon dioxide (CO2) 0.4% Oxygen (O2) 3.0% Methane (CH4) 48.6% Nitrogen (N2) http://www.treepower.org/fuels/biomasssyngas.html HMI International. Data derived from a fixed bed updraft gasifier design. Composition of syngas http://www.treepower.org/fuels/biomasssyngas.html (1) Steam - Its generation and use, Babcock and Wilcox, pp. 5-20 and 5-21 discussion of coal producer gas. (2) HMI International. Data derived from a fixed bed updraft gasifier design. (3) Steam -- Babcock and Wilcox, p. 5-19. Ljungdahl-Wood-Pathway (acetogenesis) 2[H] CO2 2[H] CHO-THF THF ATP CH-THF Fdred CH2-THF CH3-THF Formyl tetrahydrofolate Methyl tetrahydrofolate CO2 ATP generation via CO-DH, Rnf complex, and ATP-synthase B12 CH3-B12 Methyl B12 CO ו CO ו Fe Fe 2[H] ו ו -Ni Fe ו -Ni -Ni-CH3 CO dehydrogenase CoA H 2O CO CO2 Fdox Fdred NADH2 NAD H+out ADP+Pi O װ CH3-C-O Acetate H+in ATP O װ CH3-C~SCoA - ATP Acetyl-CoA According to Brock (1997). Biology of Microorganisms. Prentice Hall and (Koepke et. al. (2010). PNAS 107, 29: 13087-13092)