Chapter 4 Consideration I. The Basics Consideration is the exchange of value, or the promise to exchange value, by the parties to a contract. A. 1. 2. Agree to do something no legally obligated to do or Agree not to do something hey had a legal right to do. Bilateral Contract B. 1. 2. 3. 4. Found in the promises exchanged Each party to make at least one promise to the other Promisor: Maker of the Promise Promisee: Receiver of the Promise Benefit / Detriment Theories of Consideration C. 1. 2. 3. 4. Consideration – Promisor agrees to suffer a loss or a detriment Detriment – Loss suffered in agreeing to do something not obligated or agreeing not to do what entitled to do. Benefit theory – value the promisee is receiving Detriment theory – value promisor is giving up Unliateral Contracts D. Instead if return promises, promisor asks for the performance 1. Adequacy and equality of consideration E. Promises do not have to be equal 1. 2. F. Assignment p. 76 Only need inducement to contract Does not need to meet a reasonable person standard Some promises do not constitute valid consideration II. Promises that are not valid consideration Illusory Promise A. Where the promisor has not obligated himself to perform the contract 1. Ex. 4.4 Sell Peaches “If I feel like it.” Ex. 4.5 Sell Zuchini “If yield is high enough.” Is there an obligation to perform here? Only if the promisor chooses to perform. What legitimate uses are there? 2. Problems? Benefits? Promise of good faith? 3. Covenant of good faith and fair dealing Promises to confer gifts B. Donative Promise – a promise to make a gift These are not contracts Moral Pressure C. Mills v. Wyman 1. Cant force father to pay since he his not part pf the contractual undertaking No moral obligation is contractual Webb v. McGowan 2. A promise made, supported by moral consideration is enforceable if the promisor received economic benefit from the promisee, even if the benefit was received before the promise was made. Preexisting duty D. If a party has a legal duty to perform some acts or act, a new promise to perform those same acts does not constitute valid consideration Modification – Changes to a contract through mutual agreement of the parties 1. 2. a. b. c. d. Common law requires additional consideration UCC does not (§2-209) If unforeseen at the time of contract formation, parties can make enforceable modification because “new” consideration No preexisting duty if rescind contract and enter in a new one with changes Discharge of debt 3. The settling of a debt for a lesser amount is confined to: a. b. c. Liquidated debt – liability and amount due are not in dispute Unliquidated debt – parties have a legitimate disagreement as to existence of liability and amount due Accord and satisfaction – agreement to substitute a different contract Public Obligations 4. Cop can’t get reward Nominal Consideration E. Consideration that is extremely small in relation to other party’s Not enforceable Token promise for a promise to surrender something of real value Æ gifts 1. 2. 3. Giving up legal claim or right F. Valid legal claim 1. a. b. Release – Contract where party voluntarily gives up some or all of his rights Valid consideration Invalid legal claim 2. a. b. Not valid consideration Unless good faith belief in validity of claim – rpp to agree Legal right 3. a. Sufficient consideration – Hamer v. Sidway Giving up a legal right in return for payment = valid consideration III. Promissory Estoppel A. B. C. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. D. Background – Kirsky v. Kirsky Detrimental Reliance Reliance on a promise which damaged her Need: Reliance must be foreseeable Intended recipient must have actually relied on the promise Reliance must cause loss or detriment Reliance must be reasonable Promisee must shoe substantial economic loss if promise was allowed to be retracted Only way to avoid injustice is to enforce promise and not allow retraction Rest. 2d. §90 p. 95 The key to consideration: Each party must have suffered detriment or been given a benefit There must some form of “Bargained for exchange”