MEET, 2014, Nice A.Z. Sint-Blasius, Dendermonde Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden Patrick Peeters Jürgen Verbist OLV Hospital, Aalst Evidence for endovascular treatment for TASC C and D femoral lesions Lieven Maene R.Z. Heilig Hart, Tienen Koen Keirse Bart Joos Koen Deloose, MD FMRP 2014 | 1 MCQ: How to treat? SFA TASC A lesion FMRP 2014 | 2 MCQ: How to treat? SFA TASC B lesion FMRP 2014 | 3 MCQ: How to treat? SFA TASC C lesion FMRP 2014 | 4 MCQ: How to treat? SFA TASC D lesion FMRP 2014 | 5 TASC A & B – evidence for BMS 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 80 2 1 70 4 3 5 60 6 Stent 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50 40 PP@12M ± 75% 30 20 FAST FACT RESILIENT 4EVER DURABILITY ASTRON VIENNA 10 0 0 5 10 Lesion Length (cm) 15 FMRP 2014 | 6 TASC A & B – evidence for DCB 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 80 2 70 1 3 60 DCB 50 1. 2. 3. 40 PP@12M ± 78% 30 20 THUNDER FEMPAC LEVANT I 10 0 0 5 10 Lesion Length (cm) 15 FMRP 2014 | 7 TASC A & B – evidence for DES 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 1 80 70 2 60 DES 50 40 1. 2. PP@12M ± 85% 30 20 ZILVER PTX STRIDES 10 0 0 5 10 Lesion Length (cm) 15 FMRP 2014 | 8 Reality TASC C & D FMRP 2014 | 9 Reality TASC C & D chemical action 2. DES scaffolding 3. DCB 1. BMS 4. Covered Stent mechanical barrier FMRP 2014 | 10 1. BMS • DURABILITY 200 – prospective, multi-center, non randomized trial – lesion length ≥ 150 mm (mean lesion length: 24,2 cm) – 100 subjects FMRP 2014 | 11 1. BMS • VIASTAR – prospective, randomized, multi-center trial – subjects: 69 BMS (72 Viabahn) – mean lesion length for BMS: 17.3 ± 6.6 cm BMS p value Primary patency 53.5% 0.009 Freedom from TLR 77.0% 0.37 Lammer et al. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013, 62(15), 1320-1327 FMRP 2014 | 12 TASC C & D – evidence for BMS 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 80 70 Stent 1. DURABILITY 200 2. VIASTAR: BMS 1 60 2 50 40 PP@12M ± 65% 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 Lesion Length (cm) 25 30 FMRP 2014 | 13 2. DES • Zilver PTX trial: long lesions FMRP 2014 | 14 TASC C & D – evidence for DES 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 1 80 2 70 60 DES 50 1. 2. 40 PP@12M ± 82% 30 20 10 ZILVER PTX registry ZILVER PTX single arm study 0 0 5 10 15 20 Lesion Length (cm) 25 30 FMRP 2014 | 15 3. DCB • Leipzig registry – Single center registry of fem-pop lesions – 288 treated limbs, Rutherford 2-6 – Lesion length: 24.0 ± 10.1 cm – – – – stenosis / occlusion de novo restenosis in-stent restenosis Schmidt et al. LINC 2013 34.7 % / 65.3 % 51.7 % 11.1 % 37.2 % FMRP 2014 | 16 3. DCB Schmidt et al. LINC 2013 FMRP 2014 | 17 3. DCB • Zeller registry – multi-center, retrospective analysis – IN.PACT DCB vs. DES – Lesions ≈ 19 cm FMRP 2014 | 18 TASC C & D – evidence for DCB 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 2 80 1 70 60 DCB 50 1. 2. 40 Leipzig registry Zeller registry PP@12M ± 77% 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 Lesion Length (cm) 25 30 FMRP 2014 | 19 4. Covered Stent • VIABAHN 25CM – multi-center, non-randomized, prospective trial – 71 subjects, mean lesion length: 26,5 cm FMRP 2014 | 20 4. Covered Stent • VIASTAR – prospective, randomized, multi-center trial – subjects: 72 Viabahn (69 BMS) – mean lesion length for Viabahn: 19.0 ± 6.3 cm Viabahn BMS p value Primary patency 78.1% 53.5% 0.009 Freedom from TLR 84.6% 77.0% 0.37 Lammer et al. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013, 62(15), 1320-1327 FMRP 2014 | 21 TASC C & D – evidence for Covered Stent 100 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 80 2 70 Covered Stent 1. VIABAHN 25CM 2. VIASTAR: Viabahn 1 60 50 40 PP@12M ± 73% 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 Lesion Length (cm) 25 30 FMRP 2014 | 22 TASC C & D – evidence 100 DCB 12-month Primary Patency (%) 90 1 2 2 2 80 70 1 2 50 40 DES 30 1. 2. 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 Lesion Length (cm) 25 Leipzig registry Zeller registry BMS 1. DURABILITY 200 2. VIASTAR: BMS 1 1 60 1. 2. 30 ZILVER PTX registry ZILVER PTX single arm study Covered Stent 1. VIABAHN 25CM 2. VIASTAR: Viabahn FMRP 2014 | 23 Conclusion • Scaffolding BMS are insufficient for long SFA lesions • Scaffolding and chemical active DCB look very promising although we wait for more, upcoming scientific data • Chemical active, scaffolding DES and scaffolding mechanical barriers as Covered stents are reaching high patency levels in these challenging lesions FMRP 2014 | 24