Supplier Self Assessment
Supplier:
Date:
Scoring explanation
Supplier Self Assessment
Cost Reductions and VA (Value Analysis)
supplier exceeds cost reduction targets, participates in VA with own proposals (with comparable
automotive suppliers Tier-1 in the last 3 years)
supplier meets cost reduction targets, with willingness for participation in VA with (with comparable
automotive suppliers Tier-1 in the last 3 years)
good performance only in one section (meets cost targets or VA proposals with comparable
automotive suppliers Tier-1 in the last 3 years)
insufficient perfomance in both sections (with comparable automotive suppliers Tier-1 in the last 3
years)
very poor performance in both sections (with comparable automotive suppliers Tier-1 in the last 3
years)
Purchasing
accepts Open Book Policy, provides Cost Analysis, maintains data for key sub-suppliers
Open Book Policy / Cost Analysis
some cost breakdown data exists, little or no data exists for key sub-suppliers
not yet sent to the customer
no acceptance of Open Book / provides no Cost Analysis
supplier meets target payment terms (60 days net)
Payment Terms
supplier fails to meet target, but improved against the year before
supplier fails to meet target payment terms
accepance of LTA's (Purchasing Contract and Delivery Contract)
Long Term Agreements (with year to year cost red. for new and
transfer business)
not yet sent to the customer
supplier refuses to sign LTA's
very good comm./Cooperat., excellent accuracy of quotations
Communication / Cooperation (Purchasing) incl. lead time
good comm./Cooperat., good accuracy of quotations
and accuracy of Quotations, participation in e-RfQ and e-Auction
sufficient comm./Cooperat., acceptable accuracy of quotations
Logistics
insufficient comm./Cooperat., inacceptable accuracy of quotations
On Time Delivery (OTD)
delivery performance exceeds target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive
customers)
delivery performance is to target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive
customers)
delivery performance is below target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive
customers)
delivery performance is below target, with occurance of a customer line stop (based on 12 month
data for comparable Tier-1 automotive customers)
Lead Time and Flexibility
short lead time, high flexibility
(with regards to shedule changes)
medium lead time, sufficient flexibility
insufficient lead time, no flexibility
KANBAN / Pull / JIT
supplier supports low inventory levels through KANBAN/Pull/JIT as requested
no programs for low inventoy levels supported
Cooperation/Communication (Logistics) including early
very good comm./Cooperat., excellent order conf. and early notifications
notification of issues, order confirmations, EDI, Supply Web,
returnable packaging programs
good comm./Cooperat., good order conf. and early notifications
sufficient comm./Cooperat., acceptable order conf. and early notifications
insufficient comm./Cooperat., inacceptable order conf. and early notifications
supplier is at 0 ppm (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive customers)
PPM Rate (12 month period)
supplier exceeds ppm target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive
customers)
supplier meets ppm target, or is 20% over (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1
automotive customers)
supplier is 20% to 100% over ppm target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1
automotive customers)
supplier is more than douple the target (based on 12 month data for comparable Tier-1 automotive
customers)
acceptance of QAA
Quality Assurance Agreement
QAA has not been sent to the customer until yet
suppier refused QAA
ISO/TS 16949: 2002 + ISO 14001
Quality
ISO/TS 16949: 2002
Quality Certifikation
ISO 9001:2000
no current certification, but a plan to achieve one of the above mentioned
no certification
A-rated by the last audit of a comparable Tier-1 automotive supplier
Systems / Process audit performance
AB-rated by the last audit of a comparable Tier-1 automotive supplier; some minor issues which
were resolved quickly
B-rated by the last audit of a comparable Tier-1 automotive supplier; major issues on recent audits
or slow resolution on minor issues
C-rated by the last audit of a comparable Tier-1 automotive supplier; ongoing unresolved major
issues identified by recent audits
very good comm./Cooperat., excellent and quick response on concerns (below the time which was
given by the customer)
Cooperation / Communication (Quality) including response on
concerns (8D), accuracy of PPAP and APQP, Capacity Mgmt.
Anlage Nr. 2a - Lieferantenselbstbewertung.xls
good comm./Cooperat., good and quick response on concerns (within the time which was given by
the customer)
sufficient Comm./Cooperat., acceptable response on concerns (80% of the responses on customers
concerns within the given time shedule)
Hutchinson Purchasing
09.04.2014
Quality
Supplier Self Assessment
Supplier:
Cooperation / Communication (Quality) including response on
Date:
concerns (8D), accuracy of PPAP and APQP, Capacity Mgmt.
Scoring explanation
Supplier Self Assessment
insufficient Comm./Cooperat., inacceptable response on concerns
TPeucr hc nh iacsai ln Sg u p p o r t
excellent (average range of machine outfit / measurement equipment not older than 5 years)
Design Capability and Standards of production process,
Cost
Reductions
and
VA (Value Analysis)
equipment
and quality
measurement
acceptable (80% of average machine outfit / measurement equipment not older than 5 years)
poor (machine outfit isn't appropriate to meet Hutchinson's cost and quality targets)
Product and Technology Range, Capital Investm., Testing
Capability
fits excellent to Hutchinson's requirements, strategic plan available and approved by the
management (Investment was more than 3% of annual turn over of last business year)
fairly good fit to Hutchinson's requirements (existing technologies to produce the inquired parts
within the required cost and quality frame)
poor fit to Hutchinson's requirements
no issues with launch timing, PPAP submission meets the time shedule of the customer
Program Management
minor issues in recent launches, minor deviations in submission of PPAP documents
major issues in recent launches, impacting overall timing or product functionality
very good comm. / cooperation, excellent technical support and/or complete take over of R&D
projects according to customer's specification
Cooperation / Comunication incl. Technical Support (for new good comm. / cooperation, good support and/or take over of single development duties under
customer's leadership
and current bus. Incl.R&D support for Design Verification (design,
good comm. / cooperation, acceptable support and/or implementation of customer's technical
testability), including guest engineer programs)
specifications
insufficient Comm./Cooperat., inacceptable support
ISO 14001certification is in place and IMDS reports are received as required
Environmental Management
Plans exist for ISO 14001; IMDS reports are received as required
Management
no plan for ISO 14001and/or failure to supply IMDS reports
supplier is known to be very healthy with a financial index (< 1,6)
Financial Health
supplier is known to be healthy with a financial index (< 2,6)
supplier has an average financial health with a financial index (< 3,1)
supplier is known to be significantly at risk with a financial index (> 3,0)
Production Facilities in LCC
production facilities in Low Cost Countries available
no production facilities in Low Cost Countries available
good support
Support of high and low volume production and Prototype
delivery (leadtime and quality)
average support
poor support
Continous Improvement
Anlage Nr. 2a - Lieferantenselbstbewertung.xls
management committed to Continous Improvement
management not committed to Continous Improvement
Hutchinson Purchasing
09.04.2014