5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
Edge Triggered
An escapade with electricity at the precipice of sanity
The Golden Gnat
23 February 2010
As my first blog entry, I have decided to write about the Honeywell GG440A18 “Golden Gnat” mechanical rate
gyroscope and how to get it working.
According to unofficial information, this cold-war era device has been used in various missile and radar systems
since the 1960s. US Dynamics Corporation (USD) now make “Form, Fit and Function” replacements [1] for
the Honeywell GG445 series which I can only assume are very similar to the GG440.
These gyros have been circulating internet surplus stores for some time. I purchased mine from Goldmine
Electronics [2] late last year. They (I bought three) are dated June 1981, so this surplus stock has been around
longer than me. Nevertheless, they appear to be in excellent condition, and indeed golden.
The device uses a polyphase hysteresis type AC motor to spin a mass (the rotor itself) within a gimbal structure,
whose position controls the coupling between the windings of a differential transformer, known as the pickoff. By
exciting the primary pickoff winding with an AC signal, the angular rate and direction are deducible from the
magnitude and phase of the current induced in the secondary side windings [3][4]. I figure this is typical of a
mechanical rate gyroscope, but is certainly very different to the MEMS gyros I’m used to
Anyhow, a couple weeks back I finally decided to bring one of these little golden critters to life. Here is how I
went about it…
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
1/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
Step 1: Getting the motor to spin.
The gyro’s motor requires two AC bipolar drive signals separated by 90 degrees at presumably 400 Hz. As I
happened to have a couple of STMicro’s L165 power op-amps at hand, I went ahead and built a simple directdrive sinusoidal quadrature oscillator for this purpose:
You might be wondering why the six zener diodes? The purpose of these is to prevent saturation of the
waveform. I also happened to have exactly six 3 V zeners in my drawer at the time. Also note that resistor R8
was added to initiate oscillation on power-up, and that the op-amp output snubber values were arbitrarily chosen
and probably have no real significance.
Not the most stable design in terms of frequency drift, but for a test circuit I was satisfied. I think the following
screenshot speaks for itself:
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
2/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
Step 2: Exciting the pickoff.
The primary winding of the pickoff is driven by a single phase AC signal. I couldn’t find any specifications for the
Honeywell GG440’, so it was up to the generic guidance of USD documentation and a bit of experimentation to
work out.
Typically one would want to oscillate the pickoff at a frequency much higher than the response bandwidth of the
gyro to avoid aliasing. I figured this would be maybe 50Hz at best, though highly unlikely. Additionally, the
inherent cog-free (cogless, uncogful, without cog?) motion of the hysteresis motor practically eliminates the
impact of motor drive frequency on sampling error. With this in mind, and in my initial haste, I simply tapped off
one of the motor drive phases to provide an excitation signal for the pickoff winding. This was simple and
worked OK.
By this stage I had already advanced to Step 3 by building a demodulator, so it was time to decide on an optimal
frequency to drive the pickoff. It was an iterative process, and as you’ll find out, a 0 or 180 degree phase
relationship between input and output was desirable in addition to maximizing the output signal swing.
Equipped with a signal generator (my computer) and an amplifier, I was able to sweep through a range of
frequencies up to 10 kHz while wiggling the gyroscope and monitoring the input-output response.
Coincidentally, the largest magnitude response and suitable phase shift were both observed at about 1 kHz,
without capacitive tuning. It was time to build a computer-free circuit:
Here I have modified the typical op-amp based Wien bridge oscillator to provide a higher current output.
Resistors R(1,2,3,4,10) and diodes D(1,2) adjust the output voltage swing and prevent op-amp saturation. C5
provides the bulk of the output feedback, while R7 is to help with initial start-up. Resistors R(8,9) relieve the
BJTs of excessive power dissipation by sharing some of the waste. Did I really need to say all that? Am I
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
3/8
5/26/2011
BJTs of excessive
"Golden
Gnat"
Rate
« Edge Trigger…
power dissipation by
sharing
some
ofGyro
the waste.
Did I really need to say all that? Am I
rambling on too much?
The following screenshot shows the waveforms produced by this circuit while powering the primary pickoff coil:
The visible periodic glitch is caused by a combination of the pickoff inductance and the limited speed at which the
circuit can react to the dead-zone caused by the base-emitter junctions of the transistors. A snubber would
alleviate this issue.
Step 3: Demodulating the output.
In order to report both magnitude and direction information of angular velocity, some kind of phase sensitive
rectification of the pickoff output is required. This can be achieved by using a couple of bipolar transistors and a
differential amplifier to work with the synchronized input and output waveforms of the pickoff:
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
4/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
(Adapted from [5])
By studying this circuit, it becomes apparent that for the best results, i.e. maximum sensitivity, both the pickoff
windings must be either in phase, or 180 degrees out of phase. A 90 degree separation is worst, but can be
corrected for by using a lead or lag compensator on the pickoff primary sampling input. To show why an out of
phase relationship is undesirable, compare in the following illustration, a normalized pickoff input (red), pickoff
output (blue), and how the rectified difference (filled in green) affects the average output magnitude (purple):
Referring back to the schematic, it is also worth noting that because BJTs have been used here for the
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
5/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
rectification, there will be some dead-zone around the waveform zero crossings, so the pickoff oscillator need
not have perfect zero-crossing characteristics – something I hadn’t thought of at the time. The rest of the circuit is
just offset nulling, some gain and some filtering.
Results
The output bandwidth of the demodulator is limited to about 3 Hz, so the time scale of the following graph
covers 10 seconds to show the relevant information. Here I’ve tried to rotate the gyro by hand at a constant rate
back and forth 180 degrees while pausing in between turns:
From the rate output, it looks as though I’ve consumed too much coffee, but after integrating the output to give
angular position, you can see that I didn’t do too badly after all. If this isn’t convincing enough, perhaps the
following video will give a better idea of the response:
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
6/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
Final words?
Getting the GG400’ mechanical gyro to provide a useful, legible output is not a trivial task. While focusing on the
basics, many design aspects such as stability, efficiency, and elegance were pushed aside. The motor controller
works well in a test environment but suffers from drift, while the pickoff oscillator and demodulator could be
combined and simplified. Maybe one day I’ll improve on these things, but for now I’m satisfied and I hope you
are too.
References
1. US Dynamics Corporation, “Rate Gyroscopes: 475 Series”, US Dynamics Corporation, December 18,
2006, [Online]. Available: http://www.usdynamicscorp.com/literature/general/475_series1.pdf [Accessed:
February, 2010].
2. Goldmine Electronics, “SALE! Missile Rate Gyroscope”, Goldmine Electronics, http://www.goldmineelec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17270 [Accessed: February, 2010].
3. US Dynamics Corporation, “US Dynamics Model 475 Series Rate Gyroscope Technical Brief” (USDAN-001), US Dynamics Corporation, December, 2005, [Online].
http://www.usdynamics.org/whatsnew/news/USD%20News%20%20US%20Dynamics%20Rate%20Gyroscope%20AN-0011.pdf [Accessed: February, 2010].
4. US Dynamics Corporation, “Spinning Mass Mechanical Gyroscopes” (USD-AN-005), US Dynamics
Corporation, August, 2006, [Online]. http://www.usdynamicscorp.com/literature/general/AN005%20USD%20Spinning%20Mass%20Gyroscopes.pdf [Accessed: February, 2010].
5. US Dynamics Corporation, “Basic Output Generator Excitation and Demodulation Requirements for US
Dynamics Miniature Gyroscopes” (USD-AN-004), US Dynamics Corporation, August, 2006, [Online].
http://www.usdynamicscorp.com/literature/general/AN-004%20USD%20Pickoff%20IO.pdf [Accessed:
February, 2010]
Posted by mhexrobot
Filed in "Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro
Tags: gg440, golden gnat, guidance, hysteresis motor, MEMS, missile, pickoff, quadrature oscillator, radar, rate
gyroscope
9 Comments »
Pages
About
Categories
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro
Inertia Wheel Pendulum
Search
Search
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
7/8
5/26/2011
"Golden Gnat" Rate Gyro « Edge Trigger…
Archives
January 2011 (1)
October 2010 (2)
September 2010 (4)
February 2010 (1)
Blogroll
WordPress.com
WordPress.org
Theme: Simpla by Phu. Blog at WordPress.com.
…wordpress.com/…/golden-gnat-rate-g…
8/8