Nuclear Chemistry/Physics Recommended Problems Learning Objectives: 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 Self Assess & Review: 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 21 2009 1 What is Radioactivity? • • • Bequerel accidentally discovered in 1896 Rutherford found two types, a third was added later. Radioactive Emission Reactions – 6 types 1. Alpha decay: spontaneous nuclear fission 24 = 24He2+ - a helium nucleus emitted the identity of the emitting nucleus changes 2. Beta decay: -10 = -10e - an electron emitted the identity of the emitting nucleus changes 3. Electron capture: A proton gains an electron becoming a neutron the identity of the emitting nucleus changes 2009 2 Rutherford’s experiment 2009 3 1 Nuclear decay reactions (natural) 226 88 1. Alpha decay: Ra Rn 222 86 4 2 He Note: Mass # decreases by 4, proton count by 2 1 0 2. Beta decay: n 11 p 10 e 14 6 Carbon 14 decay 3. Electron capture: 1 1 A neutron splits !! C 14 7 N 0 1 p 1 e 0 n 0 1 N 10 14 7 Formation of carbon 14 In fact a neutron (cosmic ray product) collides with a electron is captured and a proton emitted. 14 N 7 14 6 C and the 2009 4 Nuclear decay reactions (natural) 4. Positron, +10e /+10, emission: A proton emits a positron becoming a neutron the identity of the emitting nucleus changes 5. Gamma, 00 , emission: An unstable nucleus (i.e. higher in energy) releases energy as a gamma photon ( = 10-12 m or less) Geometric re-arrangement re arrangement of neutrons and protons in nucleus to lower energy state. Identity of emitting nucleus is unchanged 6. Spontaneous fission: (not involving alpha particle) Similar to alpha emission Relatively uncommon Identity of emitting nucleus is changed – two new “daughter” nuclei are formed. 2009 5 Nuclear decay reactions (natural) 4. Positron emission: 95 p 0n 1e 1 1 1 0 43 99 m 5. Gamma emission: 6. Spontaneous Fission: 95 0 Tc 42 Mo 1 e 43 236 92 U 99 0 Tc 43 Tc 0 96 39 Y 136 53 1 I 40 n • Why does radioactive decay occur? • The existence of stable nuclei with more than one proton is due to the nuclear force. – The nuclear force is the strongest force of attraction between nucleons acting only at very short distances (about 10-15 m). – This force more than compensates for the electrostatic repulsion resulting in a stable nucleus. 2009 6 2 Nuclear decay – Why? • Factors affecting/effecting nuclear stability – The shell model of the nucleus: a model in which protons and neutrons are in energy shells, analogous to the shell structure in electron configurations. – Empirical evidence that nuclei with certain numbers off protons t andd neutrons t appear to t be b very stable t bl – These numbers, called magic numbers, are the numbers of nuclear particles in a completed shell of protons or neutrons. • Because the strong nuclear force differs from the electrostatic force, these numbers are not the same as those for electrons in atoms. 2009 7 Magic Numbers and the Band of Stability • For protons, the magic numbers are – 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, and 82 • For neutrons, the magic numbers are – 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126 – No stable nuclides are known with atomic numbers ggreater than 83. • Evidence also points to the special stability of pairs of protons and pairs of neutrons. Table 21.1 Number of Stable Isotopes 157 52 50 5 Number of protons Even Even Odd Odd Number of neutrons Even Odd Even Odd 8 • Alpha emission: Band of Stability occurs for those nuclei with Atomic # > 83. This is the release of 2 protons and 2 neutrons – He nucleus. • Beta emission: For nuclei with N/Z too l large :np • Electron capture or positron emission: For nuclei with N/Z too small. p n electron capture p n positron emission 2009 9 3 2009 10 Spontaneous Nuclear Decay Processes • Uranium 238 decay sequence – 14 step process ending in the formation of Pb-206 1. 23892U 23490Th + 42He (alpha emission) 2. 23490Th 23491Pa + 0-1e (beta emission) 3. 23491Pa 23492U + 0-1e (beta emission) 4 23492U 23090Th + 42He 4. H (alpha emission) – – This process continues with several , following Radioactive nuclei continue to decay until a stable non-radioactive state is reached. 14. 14. 210 84Po 206 Tl 81 20682Pb + 20682Pb + 4 2He (alpha emission) 0 -1e (beta emission) 2009 11 U-238 14 step decay process 2009 12 4 Radioactive Half-Life • HalfHalf-life: life the length of time required for one half of the radioactive material to decay. • Radioactive decay is a First order process – Exponential decay curve, ½ life is constant • Half-life time, t1/2 is strictly dependent upon the exact material: – 238U t1/2 = 4.5 billion years! – 214Po t1/2 = 0.00016 second – 31H, primary coolant product, t1/2 = 12.3 yr – 14C 14N + 0-1e 5730 yr. • 14 14C decay every second in your body/kg mass because humans are 18% C by weight. 2009 13 Neutron Induced Nuclear Fission • The Process (U-235) – a high energy/speed neutron slams into the nucleus of a 235U atom. – The 235U nucleus splits into two ‘daughter’ nuclei and releases more high speed neutrons. – The new neutrons can collide with more 235U. – This is initiation of a chain reaction (one that feeds itself) • Where does the energy come from? – In all exothermic reactions a small quantity of matter is converted to energy. – The total mass of the ‘daughter’ particles is less than the mass of the parent particles. 2009 14 Neutron induced fission of 235U 2009 15 5 Nuclear Fission • Mass defect – If any system loses energy, it must also lose mass. – Though mass loss in chemical reactions is small (10-12 kg), the mass changes in nuclear reactions are approximately a million times larger. • Where does the energy come from? E = mc2 Binding energy in joules Speed of light squared mass in kg E = 1 kg x (3.0 x 108m/s)2 = 9 x 1016 joules 1 kg matter energy = 2.5 years power plant operation! 2009 16 Mass Defect 238 92 U 234 Th 90 238.05078 (234.04359 + 4.00260) E = mc2 g/ mol 234.04359 - 42 He 4.00260 238.05078g/mol = -0.00459 g/mol E = -0.00459 g/mol x ((2.9979x108 m/s)2 E = -0.00459 g/mol x 1 Kg/1000 g x 8.9874 x 1016 (m/s)2 E = -4.1252 x 10 11 J/mol E = -4.13 x 108 kJ/mol NOTE: Kg/m2/s2 = J 2009 17 2009 18 6 Nuclear Fusion • Energy from Fusion? – If splitting releases energy, then from a reaction standpoint, Fusion should take energy! • Nuclear fusion: – a nuclear reaction in which light nuclei combine to give a stabler heavy nucleus, possibly neutrons, and energy is released. – Fusion again results in a mass defect – The resultant particles are less massive than the original particles. • Binding Energy – The energy needed to break a nucleus into its 2009individual protons and neutrons. 20_16 19 Figure 21.16 Plot of binding energy per nucleon versus mass number 9 n Fission Fu sio Binding energy p per nucleon (MeV) Fe-56 8 Mass # below 56, Fusion more stabilizing. Mass # above 56 56. Fission more He-4 stabilizing. The larger the difference in energy the more energy released. 7 2 1 6 0 2009 U-235 H 31 H 42 He 01 n 50 2.01400 + 3.01605 100 -- 150 + 1.008665 =200 4.00260 0.018785 250 number E = .018785/1000 x C2 xMass 1kJ/1000 J = 1.69 x 109 kJ/mol 20 4 times the energy per mole of U-235 fission Figure 21.20: Plasma confinement in a tokamak reactor. Courtesy of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. 2009 21 7 Fissionable vs. non-fissionable Isotopes • 235U is a fissionable isotope of U – only 0.7% of all U is 235U – 99.3% is 238U a non-fissionable isotope • Nuclear reactors cannot ‘run’ on normal U – Special chemical processes needed to ‘enhance’ enhance the 235U % and make a “fuel” grade U. – Very difficult and expensive process – Result: 93% 238U and 7% 235U = fuel grade • Nuclear Reactor - how does it work? 2009 22 Nuclear Power: the Seabrook Saga • Benefits of Seabrook (nuclear power) – – – – No CO2 No SOx’s, No NOx’s 1.15 gigawatts of power. (1.15 x 109 watts) Equivalent to: 1.84 million gallons of oil/day OR 10,000 tons of coal/day • New Hampshire plant - power for Boston – 1972 plans announced for 2 plants, 1st to come on line in 1979, 2nd in 1981. – Original projected cost, 2 plants: $973 million – Construction delayed until 1976 – 1984 second plant cancelled – 1986 first plant finally completed - 7 years late – 1989 testing completed – 1990 first plant licensed - 11 years behind schedule –2009Final cost for 1 plant only: $6.45 billion 23 Nuclear Reactors • Fuel Elements – UO2 pellets the size of pencil eraser, stacked end to end in Cd alloy tubes. – Cd tubes bundled into stainless steel clad bundles called fuel assemblies. – Cd Control Rods adjust neutron flux. • Primary coolant, H3BO3, aqueous boric acid – B is another neutron absorber, – the solution transfers heat energy of nuclear reaction to a heat exchanger (secondary coolant), which flashes to steam. • Seabrook: 28,000 gal vaporized per minute!!!! • Steam turns the electricity producing turbine. • Tertiary coolant cools secondary coolant for return 2009 24 to the system. 8 Uranium fuel pellets 2009 25 Cadmium fuel rod Stainless steel bundles of fuel rods 2009 26 Reactor pressure vessel Boric acid primary coolant Fuel assemblies 2009 Control rods: for neutron flux 27 9 Schematic of Seabrook plant 2009 H3BO3(aq) - boric acid 28 Cooling tower: for condensing the secondary 2009 coolant before return to the system 29 Nuclear Reactors • Can a nuclear reactor have a nuclear explosion? – NO! • Chernobyl was a chemical explosion caused by a reactor meltdown. – WHY not? – 93% 238U and 7% 235U = fuel grade – Weapons grade U must be nearly pure 235U • Can nuclear reactor fuel be used for making bombs? – Qualified NO. – Refinement to weapons grade very very difficult and expensive. 2009 30 10 2009 Reactor building at Chernobyl 31 Nuclear Breeder Reactors • Can nuclear reactor fuel be used for making bombs? – Spent fuel contains 239Pu that is fissionable, so it can be used for more power or refined chemically for weapons grade material. 238 92U + 10n 239 P 94Pu – 239 nucleons but protons by 2!!! 1 0n 1 +1p + 0 + 20-1e -1e – Fortunately, Plutonium is one of the most toxic substances known, so that chemical refinement is especially dangerous. 2009 32 Military grade Pu-239 recovered in Germany 2009 33 11 Nuclear Power Benefits and Risks • Benefits: – No CO2 or SOx or NOx produced. – Much power produced for a power hungry world. • ~17% of total world power usage. • Risks Ri k – from operating plants - minimal, less than that of conventional power plants. – Radioactive waste: LLW & HLW • Safe level is considered to be after 10 half-lives, thus ~250,000 years for current Pu waste to be “safe”. • Storage facilities must contain waste for this long! 2009 34 % Total Power from Nuclear Plants 2009 35 Total Operating Reactors 2009 36 12 2009 37 Low-level nuclear waste storage …? 2009 38 Cooling Pool for Spent Fuel Rods 2009 39 13 2009 40 HLW heated with finely ground glass and melted together. Poured into stainless steel canisters and sealed for longterm storage. Methods of sequestering HLW 2009 2009 41 A geologically stable salt cavern 1400 ft below the mountain 42 14 2009 43 Measurement of Radiation and Radiation Effects • RAD - Radiation Absorbed Dose – 1 RAD = 0.01 joule of energy absorbed /kg mass of material absorbing the radiation. – A measure of the raw energy in the radiation. – All radiation is not equal q in effect! • REM - Roentgen Equivalent Man – includes physiological damage caused as a factor in rating radiation absorbed. particles are 10 x and neutrons 5 x more damaging than particles , and x-rays. This factor is multiplied times the RAD to give the REM value. 2009 44 2009 45 15 Dose response curves for radiation 2009 46 Your annual radiation dose NOTE: 1 mrem = 10 Sv 0 300 100 1 2009 1361 47 Your Sources of Radiation 2009 48 16