Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ THE SOCIOLOGY OF DEATH AND DYING Ashok Shivaji Yakkaldevi Assistant Professor A.R. Burla Vartishta Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Solapur. Abstract: Demise and specialist matters have been fundamental points of reflection, disputatious level headed discussion, and different modes of social talk since the beginning of human advancement and, apparently, additionally among the individuals who originate before civilization. Keywords; Demise and specialist matters , Sociology , Death and Dying.. INTRODUCTION Throughout the hundreds of years, researchers of numerous stripes have identified with the matter of death and reported their insights. Rationalists have contemplated the importance of life and demise. Scholars have placed ideas and influences as to eschatological situations. Students of history have reported bunch setups of death-related conduct from the past. Artists and writers have waxed expressively on their conceptualizations of death and passing on. Archeologists have found antiquated destroys and ancient rarities and deciphered the implications of such revelations with sympathy toward the examples of life and demise among aged people groups. Researchers and therapeutic specialists have tested the physiological measurements of life and demise. Teachers have reported new examples of death-related conduct and convictions of the intriguing individuals with whom they have existed and to whom they have served. All the more as of late, anthropologists have watched and dissected demise related qualities, ceremonies, and services of the preliterate and people bunches they examine. Along these lines, by the twentieth century, a gigantic assortment of writing, data, and information concentrating on death and passing on, and related matters from numerous learned and scholarly points of view, had aggregated. Inquisitively lost from this corpus of information was any huge commitments from the scholarly trains of brain research and human science, despite the fact that truly Freud (whose life and vocation spread over the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years) had talked about subjects, for example, the contrast in the middle of grieving and sadness and the methodology of managing passing (Freud [1917] 1959). Grieving is the typical process that goes to the anguish experienced when a friend or family member bites the dust. Depression is the disease that goes to sorrow. He likewise talked about the thought of the human confidence in individual interminability. Basically, Freud ([1913] 1954) set that we couldn't encounter uneasiness about our own particular demise and watched that "our own passing is undoubtedly very incomprehensible . . . at base no one puts stock in his own particular passing . . . [and] in the oblivious everybody of us is persuaded of his own interminability" (p. 304). On the sociological side, Emile Durkheim, the early French humanist, led broad research on suicide rates and how they were identified with diverse parts of social solidarity. He distributed the aftereffects of his examination on suicide when the new century rolled over, and his monograph (1951) turned into an excellent after some time. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 1 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ II. The Past and Present in Thanatology It is trying to relate the authentic improvement of the social science of death and passing on in light of the fact that the investigation of death has been interdisciplinary to the point that it is hard to unravel the numerous strands of examination and grant from the diverse trains that have tended to the social measurements of death and biting the dust. On account of the complex mix of interdisciplinary social science research and grant that has made up the corpus of information in the investigation of death and passing on, a few scholars have been more inclined to utilize to a degree more bland marks than the humanism of death, the brain science of death, et cetera. Some have assembled the writing on this theme into the more general point of "death training" (Pine 1977), while others have talked on the subject of the "demise mindfulness development" (Doka 2003). On account of the previous, Pine (1977) reflects that "Demise Education as a scholastic order [italics added] is a genuinely late wonder, dating from the early 1960's" (p. 57). This mark alludes to the enthusiasm toward death and biting the dust that emerged among social science researchers in the mid- to late 1950s and the 1960s, which prompted the improvement of school courses in different disciplinary divisions that address different parts of death and passing on; the initiation of a few investigative diaries concentrating on the theme; the meeting of meetings and workshops; and the distributed of course readings, monographs, and collections on the subject of death and kicking the bucket. Numerous researchers who address passing and kicking the bucket basically utilize the non specific mark of "thanatology" to allude to the broad interdisciplinary, entwined, and frequently outlaw writing, and additionally the different exploration hypothetical and methodological viewpoints and methods utilized as a part of the examination of the social measurements of death, biting the dust, and deprivation. Amid the initial two many years of the twentieth century, social science writing was quiet on the theme, save, maybe, some anthropological writing that concentrated on the traditions and conduct of some preliterate and society societies, including their memorial service practices (see, e.g., Frazer 1913; Rivers [1911] 1926; Tylor 1926; Malinowski 1938). By the 1920s, social science researchers were starting to create a humble enthusiasm toward the subjects of death and passing on. Vanderlyn R. Pine (1977:59–60), in his extremely authoritative and fastidious work on the sociohistorical advancement of death instruction, reports that there were a modest bunch of social science books and articles that showed up amid the 1920s and 1930s. In his showy article, Pine particularly specifies Gebhart's (1928) basic examination of the American burial service and the funeral director. His fundamental center was on the expense of funerals, which he accepted to be unreasonably high. Interestingly, this feedback of the high cost of funerals has kept on being a theme of insightful talk for more than 70 years. The concentrate on the memorial service executive, the memorial service home, and the social flow of the burial service has been one of the real strands of exploration until today. Pine (1977:59) likewise says the exploration work of Thomas D. Eliot, a humanist, who centered his consideration on anguish and mourning (1930a, 1930b, 1933). This concentrate on despondency and loss has additionally turned into a significant examination strand in the social sciences. Pine (1977:60), in his exhaustive treatment of the subject, likewise says two different bits of death-related grant that showed up in the 1940s. He specifies The Child's Discovery of Death created by Sylvia Anthony (1940). Anthony's book pointed out the consciousness of death encounters by kids. The worry with the consciousness of death turned into an essential strand of examination in later years. Pine (1977:60) moreover examined the criticalness of the work of the therapist Erich Lindemann, who distributed an article in 1944 that concentrated on the theme of intense distress and how it could be overseen. Lindemann placed the thought that sorrow was typical and that it could be determined. His examination was focused around the survivors of the Coconut Grove sad fire in Boston in 1942, in which 490 persons kicked the bucket (Doka 2003:51). After upward of a half-century of social shirking of the subject of death and kicking the bucket in the United States, the human toll of World War II couldn't be disregarded or covered up. A few of the nations included in World War II, for example, Russia and Germany, endured gigantic misfortunes in both military and regular Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 2 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ citizen populaces. Rosenberg and Peck (2003:224) report that amid World War II, there were 20 million military passings and 30 million regular citizen passings. Firebomb air strikes, for example, those that annihilated Hamburg and Dresden in Germany and the nuclear bomb attacks of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan took the lives of more than 100,000 regular folks every bombarding attack. The phantom of the nuclear bomb with the ability of slaughtering millions couldn't be eradicated from our brains, and passing was again a fundamental distraction of the populace (see Lifton 1963; Pine 1977:63; Doka 1983:41–42). With TV, people in general could have prompt access to wars, common calamities, and mischances and the megadeaths that went hand in hand with such occasions. It was certain that passing would again rise as a theme of open and private talk and scholastic and investigative examination. Pine (1977:60), then again, notes that the humanist William M. Kephart distributed the first experimental, sociological investigation of death in 1950, looking at the inquiry of status after death. The stiring of enthusiasm toward death at a national level, be that as it may, may well have begun a couple of years prior with an anecdotal account. In 1948, Evelyn Waugh's (Evelyn Waugh was the creator's nom de plume; his full name was Evelyn Arthur St. John Waugh) blistering and humorous novella The Loved One was distributed. This book was around a sumptuous and conspicuous cemetery (a meagerly camouflaged Forest Lawn Cemetery), a pet cemetery, and the dreary exercises of a percentage of the individuals who worked at both. It was a national hit and extremely well known perusing on numerous school yards. This novel exhibited that passing had an entertaining (regardless of the fact that doleful) angle. It exhibited that one could snicker at death and be entertained by it. In the event that people in general could react in a constructive manner to a satirically comical novel about death (and people in general did), then demise could at the end of the day be a point of open, and thusly academic, interest. Robert W. Habenstein's (1949) early insightful exertion, his expert's proposition, A Sociological Study of the Cremation Movement in the United States, was guarded at the University of Chicago in 1949. Little doubt remains that Habenstein's academic thoughtfulness regarding the theme of death and kicking the bucket really went before Kephart's exploration. Further sociological enthusiasm toward death and passing on was exhibited by Habenstein's (1955) doctoral exposition, The American Funeral Director: A Study in The Sociology of Work, at the University of Chicago. It is fascinating to note that, as the title infers, Habenstein evidently considered his exploration on memorial service executives to be more research in the humanism of work than examination on death and kicking the bucket. In that year, Habenstein and William M. Lamers (1955) distributed The History of American Funeral Directing. They emulated this book with a second book, Funeral Customs the World Over, in 1960. The primary book was rich in chronicled subtle element, and the second was a far reaching culturally diverse study. Undoubtedly various researchers in the region of death and passing on got to be included in exploration on this theme through an unique investment and research in the social science of work and word related humanism. At about this time, various academic productions on death and biting the dust created the impression that gave some critical force until the very end mindfulness development. In 1955, a British social anthropologist, Geoffrey Gorer, created a passage in a book that he altered. Gorer talked about current society's social propensity to deny or disregard passing and investigated the foundation considers that offered force to this inclination (Doka 2003:51). In 1965, Gorer's book was republished and turned into one of the fundamental works in the investigation of death and kicking the bucket. In 1959, the American humanist Leroy Bowman distributed The American Funeral. Bowman's book was extremely condemning of what he saw as the too much high cost of funerals, the excessively unrestrained memorial service hones, and the memorial service industry. This book was not broadly refered to around then or even today and has not been exceptionally persuasive in scholarly rounds from that point forward, however it has, in any case, gave an embittered layout to different books accordingly distributed that were additionally extremely disparaging of, if not threatening to, American burial service hones, the high cost of funerals, and the memorial service industry. Pine (1977:63) talks about a correspondingly basic book, The High Cost of Dying (Harmer 1963), which had a greatly negative impression of the high cost of American funerals. This book may well have been something of a result of Bowman's book. This book was likewise not extremely powerful in scholastic rings. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 3 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ One broadly refered to deal with death and kicking the bucket is the analyst Herman Feifel's (1959) altered book The Meaning of Death. In this gathering of expositions, various original measurements of death and passing on, for example, the withering patient, suicide, the dread of death, present day craftsmanship and demise, passing and religion, youngsters' perspective of death, and different papers on reasoning and passing, to specify yet a couple, were investigated. Various contemporary researchers, for example, Pine (1977) and Doka (2003), consider Feifel's collection to be one of the more persuasive academic works of the time. Doka, for instance, states that "this book plainly settled passing studies as a scholastic train and offered researchers clear proof of the extensive variety of issues incorporated by the investigation of death and biting the dust" (p. 51). In a comparative, exceptionally positive evaluation of Feifel's altered work, Pine (1977:62) watches that most powers concur that it was the most critical single work that acclimated the academic group with the issues and concerns of passing on and demise. Additionally, it gave a milestone of authenticity to the recently rising field. It is interested that the development of the demise mindfulness development and the academic examination of death and passing on by social researchers have been ascribed in expansive measure to Feifel's altered book, while different books and articles on death and kicking the bucket had been at one time distributed. These past distributions, then again, did have a disciplinary point of view, for example, mental or sociological. Feifel's book contained expositions that tended to a mixed bag of issues identified with death and passing on and offered writers from various orders, including the humanities and in addition the behavioral sciences, and gave an interdisciplinary point of view. In 1958, different sociological researchers started to go to the front line with awareness raising productions that offered energy to the sociological examination of death and passing on furthermore endeavored to real it as a convincing range of exploration. Especially prominent in this try were William Faunce and Robert Fulton (1958), who distributed their provocative article "The Sociology of Death: A Neglected Area of Research." While perceiving the commitments of prior researchers, for example, Eliot (1930a, 1930b, 1933) and Kephart (1950), Faunce and Fulton introduced and examined various demise related social practices and the orderly "rich examination potential outcomes," as they expressed it. Absolutely, their article produced a much more extensive scope of enthusiasm among sociologists, because articles and books concerning passing related issues were accordingly distributed in the years taking after. The investigation of death and passing on, nonetheless, proceeded as an interdisciplinary exertion, and does so today. In this respect, in May 1963, the diary The American Behavioral Scientist distributed an extraordinary issue, "Social Research and Life Insurance" (Riley 1963). The articles concentrating on social research basically managed demise and biting the dust, and surely the subject of extra security. Donors to this issue included people from the disaster protection industry and creators from a few of the social sciences, including some conspicuous sociologists. A portion of the sociological notables were Robert K. Merton, Talcott Parsons, Kingsley Davis, and Matilda White Riley. Parson's (1963) article in this exceptional issue, "Demise in American Society: A Brief Working Paper," brought issue with the adage that American culture is a passing denying society and set a few societal postures to death that proposed more an exertion to taking care of or controlling demise than dissent. Pine (1977:64) shows that Fulton went ahead to offer the first course at an American University on death and biting the dust at Minnesota in 1963. It has been accounted for, then again, that John D. Morgan, a scholarly savant, may have been the first individual to offer a course on death and passing on at a Canadian college at or about the same time, if not prior. On the off chance that that is the situation, Morgan then was the first to offer such a course in North America. Different points of reference in the human science of death and passing on happened in the mid- to late 1960s. Fulton (1965) caught up his article with an altered book titled Death and Identity. The book was multidisciplinary in its center, and Fulton drew on researchers from numerous trains and foundations. Pine (1977) depicts the collection as "an accumulation of a portion of the finest articles accessible around then" (p. 64). He went ahead to say, "It likewise incorporated the most broad book index on death ever gathered." In that year, sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (1965) distributed their book Awareness of Dying. Their work concentrated on the social methodology of kicking the bucket and, in this example, passing on in the healing facility. These two analysts inspected the significance of death in the healing facility and the Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 4 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ communication between and among patients, medicinal staff, and relatives as a social procedure. In 1968, Glaser and Strauss took after their first book with an alternate, Time for Dying (really the third monograph in an arrangement of four focused around their examination over a time of six years). In this book, Glaser and Strauss conceptualized the idea of death as having a "trajectory of kicking the bucket," by which they alluded to the persistent's course or example of passing on. Their book investigates how the examples of passing on worldliness influence and cooperate with medicinal staff and family and the social translation and importance of different trajectories of death. An alternate huge distribution in this period was Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying (Sudnow 1967). This book additionally analyzes the setting of organized passing on "and the social association of clinic consideration and the withering patient" (Pine 1977:66). In 1966, Pine initially offered an interdisciplinary course titled "Passing" at Dartmouth College (Pine 1977:65). Three different distributions on death in the late 1960s merit notice. Robert Blauner (1966) distributed an article "Passing and Social Structure" in the diary Psychiatry. Essentially, Blauner set that demise has a problematic impact on the social endeavor regarding social connections. As needs be, society shapes social structure to compel and contain the troublesome impacts of death. One case of his speculation would be that of society lessening the imperativeness of the individuals who pass on by devaluating the social worth of the elderly, along these lines weakening or moderating the problematic impacts of death. Maybe an insightful development in the advancement of the social investigation of death and biting the dust was the book On Death and Dying by Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross (1969), a specialist. Dr. Kubler-Ross verbalized five sociopsychological phases of biting the dust and proposed that critically ill patients travel through these stages as the terminal ailment advanced. At last, the patient accomplishes the fifth and last stage, that of acknowledgement, at which point he or she can confront demise with poise and tranquility. Kubler-Ross' book and her different compositions are among the most broadly refered to productions in the field of thanatology. Her hypothesis of the five phases of passing on is today a part of the curricula of numerous claims to fame, for example, medication, nursing, psychiatry, and a few of the behavioral sciences. In discussing Kubler-Ross, Doka (2003) watches that "her message was one that rejected dehumanizing engineering, grasped a typical demise, and saw opportunities for development even toward the end of life—all of which reverberated well with American society in the 1960's" (p. 51). In 1968, Clifton Bryant established another diary titled Sociological Symposium2 at Western Kentucky University. As the title of the diary suggests, each one issue was topical. The inaugural issue was committed to the point of death. This issue, "passing," pulled in wide consideration and was generally welcomed. In 1966, Richard Kalish and Robert Kastenbaum, two clinicians, established and coedited a mimeographed pamphlet called Omega (Pine 1977:6). In 1970, this pamphlet was formalized into an academic diary titled Omega, which was coedited by the same two men (Doka 2003:520). By the most recent years of the 1960s, the investigation of death and kicking the bucket had been legitimated and standardized. Thanatology had contributed more than its fair share. Courses in death and kicking the bucket were showing up with consistency in schools and colleges the nation over, and the following few years saw a surge of productions, books, and articles tending to the point of death. The social science of death was presently an acknowledged strength territory, however the development and improvement of a thanatological writing in this forte kept on being all that much an interdisciplinary exertion, and it was still hard to unravel the sociological endeavor from that of other behavioral sciences. As Doka (2003) closed, "In rundown, the 1960s gave a firm establishment to death studies to rise as a built scholarly train with its own particular models, debates, diaries, and associations" (p. 51). The 1970s and 1980s were extremely gainful years for thanatology as far as examination and grant, and the energy of these endeavors kept on increaing until today in the new thousand years. As a major aspect of the thanatological venture, the human science of death (as a component of the bland field thanatology) has likewise delighted in overwhelming development, and the writing has stretched as needs be. The period from 1970 through 2006 has been beneficial. In 1970, the first reading material in the field of the social science of death was distributed, a beyond any doubt sign that this strength territory of humanism had been legitimated, acknowledged, and standardized (e.g., Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 5 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ expelled from the classification of recondite). The course book, created by Glenn M. Vernon, was apropos titled The Sociology of Death: An Analysis of Death-Related Behavior (1970). The book took after the examination strands that had advanced amid the early years. These approximately incorporated the importance and understanding of death, the trepidation of death and kicking the bucket, passing on as a social process, the timing of death and the conservation of life, funeralization (in spite of the fact that not under this name), loss, and restoring balance in deathdisturbed social frameworks. The content was generally utilized as a part of thanatology courses, and particularly those found in humanism offices. It didn't go into ensuing versions. Interestingly, this was the first content to be titled The Sociology of Death. The investigation of death and passing on was multidisciplinary to the point that such a title had a tendency to demoralize deals for those demise and biting the dust courses arranged in different offices. All ensuing course books, with one exemption years after the fact, in the zone of death and passing on had more nonexclusive titles, paying little heed to the scholastic control of the writer. Various different messages on thanatology have been distributed through the years. One of these is Edwin S. Shneidman's (1976) (altered) collection Death: Current Perspectives, distributed and generally utilized as a content as a part of death and kicking the bucket courses. An especially prominent (and solid) content was Robert J. Kastenbaum's (1977) Death, Society and Human Experience (now in its seventh version). An alternate content that turned out at this point was Understanding Death and Dying by Sandra Galadiers Wilcox and Marilyn Sutton (1977). In 1979, Hannelore Wass distributed her initial content Dying: Facing the Facts. It experienced various versions. Dale V. Hardt (1979) wrote Death: The Final Frontier, and the following year, Kathy Charmaz (1980) distributed The Social Reality of Death. Amid the 1980s, various different messages on death and kicking the bucket showed up. One of the first fundamental content volumes to be distributed in that decade was Death, Grief, and Caring Relationships by Richard A. Kalish (1981). It went into a second version in 1985. Kalish (1980) had prior distributed an altered treasury that inspected demise and biting the dust from multifaceted points of view. In 1983, an especially eminent content showed up: The Last Dance: Encountering Death and Dying by Lynne Ann Despelder and Albert Lee Strickland. This content was (and still is) generally utilized as a part of courses tending to death and passing on. It has ended up being to a great degree sturdy and is presently (2006) in its seventh release. The year 1985 appears to have been all that much a "guard year." Lewis R. Aiken's (1985) Dying, Death, and Bereavement was distributed then. Along these lines, as well, was John S. Stephenson's (1985) impressive work, Death, Grief, and Mourning. An alternate content on death and biting the dust distributed in that year was Dying in the Life Cycle: Psychological, Biomedical, and Social Perspectives, wrote by Walter J. Smith (1985). Yet an alternate content distributed in 1985 was Understanding Dying, Death, and Bereavement by Michael R. Leming and George E. Dickinson. This book was broadly utilized as a part of the classroom furthermore turned out to be extremely strong. It is currently in its sixth release (2006). In the late 1980s, few more fundamental thanatology writings were distributed. One content that showed up in 1987 was Dying and Death: Coping, Caring, Understanding by Judy Oakes and Gene Ezell. Among other initial thanatology books distributed amid this period were Death in the Midst of Life: Social and Cultural Influences on Death, Grief, and Mourning by Jack B. Kamerman (1988) and Endings: A Sociology of Death and Dying by the humanist Michael C. Kearl (1989). This is the first fundamental content subsequent to Vernon's book in 1970 that had the words "humanism of death" in its title—a valiant signal by the writer. Yet an alternate content distributed here was Dying and Grieving: Lifespan and Family Perspectives by Alicia Skinner Cook and Kevin Ann Oltjenbruns (1989). Since 1990, a couple of different acquaintances with death and biting the dust have been distributed. The main was Death and Dying, Life and Living (Corr, Nabe, and Corr 1994). This content is currently (2006) in its fifth version. A few others are Death, Mourning, and Caring by Robert Maronne (1997) and Janet Lembke's (2003) The Quality of Life: Living Well, Dying Well, despite the fact that the arrangement and points of the recent content leave sort of from the customary model of themes found in most starting thanatology course readings. This rundown of early on thanatology writings is not thorough. There are others, and there are likewise countless altered compilations that have been utilized as a part of thanatology courses. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 6 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Of the cluster of books refered to, some are composed by clinicians, some by sociologists, some by gerontologists, and some by people from different controls, both behavioral sciences and the humanities. Most, if not all, of the writings, notwithstanding, have been (at one time or other) received by sociologists for utilization in their initial humanism of death courses, and the same is valid for clinicians and for thanatologists from different orders. The essential messages throughout the most recent 36 years (from 1970 when the first content showed up) speak to the history and advancement of the study (counting the sociological study) of death and biting the dust. Their particular viewpoints, rundown of points secured, and introduction demonstrate the progressions in thanatological teaching method. The peruser is welcome to audit this movement of writings throughout the years, to acquire better knowledge into the late history of thanatology, including the segment social science of death strands. In looking at these writings throughout the years, it is intriguing to note that the scope of these books, as far as points tended to, has scarcely changed in the course of the last one-third of a century. No doubt there has been a typical pool of subjects imparted by all the controls in the region of death instruction, and the writers of the books basically create their writings utilizing some, however not all, of the points. Each one book has a novel blend of themes and scope, and this distinctive blend is the thing that makes every content unique. Various books utilize a mixof subjects generally like others. Some give a greater number of accentuation to a portion of the subjects than others do. This distinction in scope brings about two different classifications as far as introduction. A portion of the writings give more scope and attention to subjects that concentrate on interpersonal association, feelings, and the subjective parts of passings. The accentuation here is on subjects, for example, the dread of death; the social methodology of kicking the bucket; the connection between and among terminal patients, relatives, and restorative work force; and distress, grieving, and deprivation. This class of essential messages basically takes a gander at subjective demise related matters. It likewise has a greater amount of a connected introduction in the feeling of trying to get ready people in the wellbeing or helping employments, for example, medical attendants, social laborers, or those in guiding. This kind of book is all the more often created by therapists, gerontologists, persons in the wellbeing or therapeutic fields, or the individuals who are included in profound matters, for example, priests, rationalists, or scholars. The Corr content, for instance, has such initiation. These writings have a sociopsychological or sociomedical viewpoint. Such books can be termed clinical in introduction. The other class of writings is socio-anthropological in introduction. These writings concentrate all the more on target concerns, for example, funerals, body mien, demise rates, reasons for death, the etiology of death, a target audit of escatologies, and related subjects, for example, close passing encounters, suicide rates and causes, and the legalities of death. This classification of fundamental content is more isolates and spellbinding than connected and can be termed useful in introduction. This kind of book is more prone to be created by a humanist. See that essential courses in death and kicking the bucket have a tendency to be multidisciplinary and are offered in divisions of different controls, the business has a tendency to be non specific and the distributers and creators strive to incorporate various viewpoints and introductions and speak to all orders spoke to in thanatology and demise studies. It is educational to note that while the more up to date course books are more packed with photographs, diagrams, graphs, and "boxes," when their list of chapters is contrasted and that of the Vernon content (the first reading material distributed in 1970), the points recorded are basically the same, though in to a degree distinctive arrangement. A percentage of the more current writings have included a subject or thereabouts since the Vernon content a section on the legalities of death or talks of close demise encounters, war, and terrorism. Other than these points, they are basically "old wine in new jugs." The most remarkable distinction in the more current writings is that the section dialogs are focused around a much more far reaching writing and have a tendency to refer to more productions and exploration. The actuality remains, on the other hand, that it is hard to recognize sociological compositions or viewpoints from various different controls with a thanatological investment. There is not as much a humanism of death and biting the dust as there is a critical sociological commitment to the writing of thanatology, or passing and Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 7 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ kicking the bucket studies, maybe. No doubt the essential parameters of thanatology have been secured and just the crevices need to be filled and the subtleties investigated. A. The Popularity of Death Studies As specified prior, there were just a couple of scattered course offerings in death and biting the dust in the early and mid-1960s—most notably, Fulton's course, initially offered in 1963, and Pine's course, initially offered in 1966. By the late 1960s, on the other hand, courses in death and biting the dust started to show up in schools and colleges the country over, offered by clinicians, sociologists, and others in both the social sciences and the humanities. The subject of death training itself created very much a taking after, drawing in both scholastics and people in the wellbeing and directing fields, and this produced more noteworthy interest for school courses in death and kicking the bucket. Communities for death training were additionally being secured. To specify one early focus, Robert Kastenbaum, a therapist, composed and guided the Center for Psychological Studies of Dying, Death, and Lethal Behavior at Wayne State University in April 1969 (Pine 1977:68). An alternate early focus, the Center for Death Education and Research, was made by Robert Fulton, a social scientist, at the University of Minnesota in July 1969 (Pine 1977:68). After Fulton resigned, the focal point was moved to the University of Wisconsin–lacrosse, and Robert Bendiksen turned into its chief (Doka 2003:52). As indicated by Doka (2003:52), two scientists (Green and Irish 1971) found that there were more than 600 courses on death and passing on by 1971. Doka (2003:52) additionally reported that one analyst (Cummins 1978) showed that after five years, there were more than 1,000 passing and kicking the bucket courses in the United States, with the aggregate enlistment surpassing 30,000 understudies. The quantity of such courses today is, without a doubt, highly expanded, as is the aggregate enlistment. As university enthusiasm toward death and passing on expanded and spread, numerous showing assets, for example, movies, filmstrips, tapes, tapes, were created (Pine 1977:71–72). The accessibility of such material was likely one of the components in the increment in death and passing on courses. Educators with an enthusiasm toward, however minimal formal readiness for, the subject of death and passing on could all the more effectively create and show courses on these points. The accessibility of such showing helps and instructional material was likely a component in the presentation of death and kicking the bucket units or portions in both rudimentary and optional schools (Pine 1977:72). A multidisciplinary proficient association called the Forum for Death Education was composed and initiated in 1976. The name of the association was later changed to the Association for Death Education and Counseling (Doka 2003:52). This association, since its establishing, has had a position of centrality in the development and improvement of death instruction and the passing mindfulness development. The Journal of Thanatology was established in 1971 yet did not proceed past 1977. In 1977, Hannelore Wass established and altered another diary, Death Education. The name was later changed to a more nonexclusive title, Death Studies. This diary and the prior diary Omega, initially distributed in 1970, accordingly came to be viewed as official diaries of the Association for Death Education and Counseling (Doka 2003:52). In 1977, an alternate diary in the field of death and biting the dust, yet maybe fringe to the standard, was established. This diary was Markers, established in 1980 and distributed by the Association for Gravestone Studies. The Journal of Near Death Studies was established in the spring of 1988. Two more diaries, the American diary Loss, Grief, and Care, later titled Journal of Social Work in End of Life & Palliative Care, and the British diary Mortality, which initially showed up in 1996, have gotten to be extra distributed venues for thanatologists, and both peculiarity articles of wide investment and high academic quality. Amid the years when the essential messages on death and biting the dust were generally distributed in sporadic abundance, there were numerous collections (some altered by sociologists and others by researchers from various orders) likewise being distributed. The vast majority of them didn't show up in second or ensuing releases. Amid this period there were additionally various fundamental monographs distributed that were fused into the corpus of thanatological information imparted by social science and various different orders. Inquisitively, one of the prior and more imperative monographs on death was Warner's (1959) The Living and the Dead. The inquisitive Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 8 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ part of the book and its discoveries is that it developed out of a group consider and was not by and large planned (or perceived) as a commitment to the humanism of death. One piece of the book inspects certain parts of group imagery and group state of mind with respect to death and the dead and neighborhood cemeteries. An alternate prominent illustration was Death, Grief, and Mourning by Geoffrey Gorer (1965), a British social anthropologist. In 1968, Paul Irion distributed his thorough history of cremation, relevantly titled Cremation. An alternate exceptionally compelling book was The Denial of Death by Ernest Becker (1973), an American social anthropologist. Two extremely helpful and frequently refered to authentic monographs are The Puritan Way of Death: A Study in Religion, Culture, and Social Change by David E. Stannard (1977), an American student of history, and Death in Early America by Margaret Coffin (1976), an objects from olden times master. Other valuable monographs incorporate Paul E. Irion's (1954) The Funeral and the Mourners and, later, The Funeral: Vestige or Value (1966). An especially generally refered to anthropological work is Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual by Richard Huntington and Peter Metcalf (1979). As far as conclusive grant, a towering, if not amazing, monograph in the verifiable investigation of death and kicking the bucket is The Hour of Our Death by Philippe Aries (1981), a French social student of history. Aries' proposition is that in the inaccessible past, death was "tamed" (seen as inexorable and typical, acknowledged with poise, and absorbed by society). Throughout the hundreds of years, this perspective changed, so that by advanced times, death was dreaded, denied, concealed, "medicalized," "grimy," and "prohibited." An extremely valuable and gloriously definite monograph is Purified by Fire, a social history of cremation in the United States, wrote by Stephen Prothero (2001), collaborator teacher of Religion at Boston University. A portion of the monographs on death have tended to death in different societies. An especially significant and fascinating illustration of such a monograph is Price of Death: The Funeral Industry in Japan by Hikaru Suzuki (2001). Late years have seen the distribution of various far reaching reference meets expectations handbooks and reference books tending to different parts of death and passing on, wrote or altered by sociologists and researchers from different teaches that join thanatology into their examination and grant. A restricted set of samples here strength incorporate the Encyclopedia of Death, altered by Robert Kastenbaum, a gerontologist, and Beatrice Kastenbaum (1989), a medical attendant in the scholarly world. This book was one of the prior works of this classification. It is still in print (1993), in spite of the fact that by an alternate distributer. Other consequent reference works were the Encyclopedia of Afterlife Beliefs and Phenomena by James R. Lewis (1995), educator of Religious Studies, and a later release, The Death and Afterlife Book: The Encyclopedia of Death, Near Death, and Life after Death (2001). Other late reference deals with a few parts of death will be Death and the Afterlife: A Cultural Encyclopedia by Richard P. Taylor (2000), teacher of Religious Studies, and the Encyclopedia of Death and Dying, altered by Glenny Howarth, a humanist, and Oliver Leaman (2001), a thinker. One later, long and generally complete reference work is the Handbook of Death and Dying, altered by Clifton D. Bryant (2003), a social scientist. An alternate complete reference work likewise showed up in 2003, this time a reference book: Robert Kastenbaum's (a clinician) Macmillan's Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. The latest reference books incorporate Cassell, Salinas, and Winn's (2005) The Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. Two of the three creators are restorative specialists. The other latest reference book addresses a to some degree distinctive part of death—cremation: the Encyclopedia of Cremation (2005), altered by Douglas J. Davies, educator of Religious Studies and Theology. It is fascinating to note that these different reference works, talking about some part of death, kicking the bucket, and eternity, were wrote or altered by researchers from various distinctive scholastic controls and are, doubtlessly, utilized by academicians as a part of various diverse orders, including sociologists. All these books were huge commitments to the corpus of learning in thanatology and, by augmentation, human science. The humanism of death and biting the dust is just excessively interlaced with different controls to be effectively inspected outside of the standard of thanatology. Obviously, passing related articles showed up in numerous other more general diaries. A lot of people such articles take a gander at generally new ranges of death and biting the dust that have not been tended to in the Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 9 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ thanatological writings. One illustrative sample of articles on new themes is Vinitzky-Seroussi and Ben-Ari's (2000) "'A Knock on the Door': Managing Death in the Israeli Defense Forces," which showed up in the diary The Sociological Quarterly. An alternate case is Ben-Ari's (2005) "Epilog: A "Great" Military Death," which showed up in Armed Forces and Society. The different thanatological diaries today convey articles that concentrate on a significant number of the same themes as in their initial years. The fundamental parameters of thanatology seem to have changed little since the time they were initially distributed; on the other hand, the articles today regularly have a tendency to be more modern, creative, obscure, and, in a few examples, beautiful. Two illustrations from the diary Omega may serve to outline this pattern: Cox, Garrett, and Graham's (2004–2005) "Passing in Disney Films: Implications for Children's Understanding of Death" and Goodrum's (2005) "The Interaction in the middle of Thoughts and Emotions Following the News of a Loved One's Murder." An alternate illustration of the "new" kind of more untraditional themes is Breen's (2004) article "The Dead and the Living in the Land of Peace: A Sociology of the Yasukuni Shrine," which showed up in the diary Mortality. The diary articles that address passing, biting the dust, and demise related conduct are so various it is not possible list or talk about. It suffices to say that today, the group of thanatological writing is truly vigorous and there is a generous assortment of learning in this field on which to fabricate later on. The examination attempted by thanatologists, including sociologists, has all things considered been atheoretical. Then again, on the other hand, it may be said that such speculations that have driven research in the region of death and kicking the bucket have been hypotheses "of the center reach." Thanatological examination has included endeavors, for example, demographic investigations of death rates, future, and infection etiology; attitudinal investigations of death uneasiness and inclination in burial service styles, body manner, and killing; ethnographic examinations of memorial service conduct; the history and nature of cemeteries; interactional examinations of restorative staff/understanding conduct; dramaturgical examinations of burial service and burial service home conduct; authentic investigations of changes in eschatology, burial service configuration, and body mien; member perception investigations of executions, memorial service conduct, passing on conduct, and the conduct of medicinal staff to in critical condition patients; and culturally diverse investigations of death-related conduct, for example, burial service and body air, to specify yet some thanatological exploration techniques. Maybe the absolute most profitable, and hypothetically productive, examine on death and kicking the bucket has been the advancement of calculated ideal models and diagnostic typologies in regards to death-related conduct. Cases are Kubler- Ross' (1969) phases of passing on; Salamone's (1972) idealtype bifurcation of burial service homes into "nearby" and "mass" morgues; Stephenson's (1985) recorded development of eschatology, funerals, and body manner and his resultant "Times of Death"; and Worden's (1982) four assignments of grieving, to refer to a couple. Given the broad assortment of examination writing that has been created and the exceptionally astute reasonable plans and diagnostic typologies that have risen up out of this writing, there is little uncertainty that thanatological exploration, including the commitments of the human science of death and kicking the bucket, will get to be more hypothetical with time. B. The Future Few claim to fame zones in humanism have more extensive or wealthier vistas of exploration opportunities later on than the human science of death and passing on (or the more nonexclusive thanatology). The very nature and connection of death, as far as the recurrence and modes of death, the significance and dread of death, the elements of kicking the bucket, the funeralization methodology, body air, the knowledge of misery and grieving, memorialization, and suicide and killing, to say however a couple, are presently experiencing, and will keep on experiencing, significant changes. These progressions will have exceptionally critical import for some regions of our social lives and, without a doubt, will influence the aggregate request. The researchers of the humanism of death and kicking the bucket will have full research motivation later on. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 10 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCES: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Aiken, Lewis R. 1985. Dying, Death, and Bereavement. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Anthony, Sylvia. 1940. The Child‘s Discovery of Death. New York: Harcourt. Aries, Philippe.1981. The Hour of Our Death. New York: Alfred A. Knoff. Becker, Ernest. 1973. The Denial of Death. New York: Free Press. Ben-Ari, Eyal. 2005. ―Epilogue: A ‗Good‘ Military Death.‖ Armed Forces and Society 31(4):651–64. Blauner, R. 1966. ―Death and Social Structure.‖ Psychiatry 29:378–94. Bowman, Leroy. 1959. The American Funeral. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. Breen, John. 2004. ―The Dead and the Living in the Land of Peace: A Sociology of the Yasukuni Shrine.‖ Mortality 9(1):76–93. 9. Bryant, Clifton D., ed. 2003. The Handbook of Death and Dying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10. Charmaz, Kathy. 1980. The Social Reality of Death. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 11. Coffin, Margaret M. 1976. Death in Early America. New York: Elsevier/Nelson Books. 12. Cook, Alicia Skinner and Kevin Ann Oltjenbruns. 1989. Dying and Grieving. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 13. Corr, Charles A., Clyde M. Nabe, and Donna M. Corr. 1994. Death and Dying, Life and Living. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 14. Cox, Meredith, Erin Garrett, and James A. Graham. 2004–2005. ―Death in Disney Films: Implications for Children‘s Understanding of Death.‖ Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying 50(4):267–80. 15. Davies, Douglas J., ed. 2005. Encyclopedia of Cremation. London, England: Ashgate. 16. DeSpelder, Lynne Ann and Albert Lee Strickland. 1983. The Last Dance. New York: McGraw-Hill. 17. Doka, Kenneth J. 1983. ―The Rediscovery of Death: An Analysis of the Emergence of the Death Studies Movement.‖ Pp. 39–52 in Creativity in Death Education and Counseling, edited by C. A. Corr, J. Stillion, and M. Ribour. Lakewood, OH: Association for Death Education and Counseling. 18. Doka, Kenneth J. 2003. ―The Death Awareness Movement: Description, History, and Analysis.‖ Pp. 50–56 in The Handbook of Death and Dying, edited by C. D. Bryant. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 19. Durkheim, Emile. 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Translated by G. Simpson. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. 20. Eliot, T. D. 1930a. ―Bereavement as a Problem for Family Research and Technique.‖ The Family 11:114–15. 21. Eliot, T. D. 1930b. ―The Adjustive Behavior of Bereaved Families: A New Field for Research.‖ Social Forces 8:543–49. 22. Eliot, T. D. 1933. ―A Step Toward the Social Psychology of Bereavement.‖ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27:380–90. 23. Faunce, W. A. and R. L. Fulton. 1958. ―The Sociology of Death: A Neglected Area of Research.‖ Social Forces 36:205–09. 24. Feifel, Herman, ed. 1959. The Meaning of Death. New York: McGraw-Hill. 25. Frazer, Sir James G. 1913. The Belief in Immortality and the Worship of the Dead. London, England: Macmillan. 26. Freud, Sigmund. [1913] 1954. ―Thoughts for the Times on War and Death.‖ Pp. 288–321 in Collected Works, vol. 4. London, England: Hogarth Press. 27. Freud, Sigmund. [1917] 1959. ―Mourning and Melancholia.‖ Pp. 237–58 in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14, edited and translated by J. Stachey. London, England: Hogarth Press. 28. Fulton, R. 1965. Death and Identity. New York: Wiley. Gebhart, J. C. 1928. Funeral Costs: What They Average? Are They Too High? Can They Be Reduced? New York: Putnam. 29. Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1965. Awareness of Dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine. 30. Glaser, Barney and Anselm L. Strauss. 1968. Time for Dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine. 31. Goodrum, Sarah. 2005. ―The Interaction between Thoughts and Emotions Following the News of a Loved One‘s Murder.‖ Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying 51(2):143–60. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 11 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 32. Gorer, Geoffrey. 1965. Death, Grief, and Mourning. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. 33. Habenstein, Robert W. 1949. ―A Sociological Study of the Cremation Movement in the United States.‖ M.A. Thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 34. Habenstein, Robert W. 1955. ―The American Funeral Director: A Study in the Sociology of Work.‖ Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 35. Habenstein, Robert W. and William M. Lamers. 1955. The History of American Funeral Directing. Milwaukee, WI: National Funeral Directors Association of the United States. 36. Habenstein, Robert W. and William M. Lamers. 1960. Funeral Customs the World Over. Milwaukee, WI: Bulfin Printers. Hardt, Dale V. 1979. Death: The Final Frontier. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 37. Harmer, Ruth Mulvey. 1963. The High Cost of Dying. New York: Crowell-Collier Press. 38. Howarth, Glennys and Oliver Leaman, eds. 2001. Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. London, England: Routledge. 39. Huntington, Richard and Peter Metcalf. 1979. Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 40. Irion, Paul E. 1954. The Funeral and the Mourners. Nashville, TN: Abington Press. 41. Irion, Paul E. 1966. The Funeral: Vestige or Value. Nashville, TN: Abington Press. 42. Irion, Paul E. 1968. Cremation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press. Kalish, Richard A. 1980. Death and Dying: Views from Many Cultures. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood. 43. Kalish, Richard A. 1981. Death, Grief, and Caring Relationships. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. 44. Kamerman, Jack B. 1988. Death in the Midst of Life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 45. Kastenbaum, Robert J. 1977. Death, Society, and Human Experience. Saint Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby. 46. Kastenbaum, Robert J., ed. 2003. Macmillan‘s Encyclopedia of Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan. 47. Kastenbaum, Robert J. and Beatrice Kastenbaum, eds. 1989. Encyclopedia of Death. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. 48. Kearl, Michael C. 1989. Endings: A Sociology of Death and Dying. New York: Oxford University Press. 49. Kephart, William M. 1950. ―Status after Death.‖ American Sociological Review 15:635–43. 50. Kubler-Ross, Elisabeth. 1969. On Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan. 51. Lembke, Janet. 2003. The Quality of Life: Living Well, Dying Well. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press. 52. Leming, Michael R. and George E. Dickinson. 1985. Understanding Dying, Death, and Bereavement. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 53. Leming, Michael R. and George E. Dickinson. 2006. Understanding Dying, Death, and Bereavement. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth. 54. Lewis, James R. 1995. Encyclopedia of Afterlife Beliefs and Phenomena. Detroit, MI: Visible Ink Press. 55. Lewis, James R. 2001. The Death and Afterlife Book: The Encyclopedia of Death, Near Death, and Life after Death. Canton, MI: Visible Ink Press. 56. Lifton, R. J. 1963. ―Psychological Effects of the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima: The Theme of Death.‖ Daedalus 92:462–97. 57. Lindemann, E. 1944. ―Symptomatology and Management of Acute Grief.‖ American Journal of Psychiatry 101:141–48. 58. Malinowski, B. 1938. Magic, Science, and Religion and Other Essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. 59. Maronne, Robert. 1977. Death, Mourning, and Caring. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 60. Mitford, Jessica. 1963. The American Way of Death. New York: Simon & Schuster. 61. Oaks, Judy and Gene Ezell. 1987. Dying and Death: Coping, Caring, Understanding. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick. 62. Parsons. 1963. ―Death in American Society: A Brief Working Paper.‖ American Behavioral Scientist 6(9):61– 65. 63. Pine, Vanderlyn R. 1977. ―A Socio-Historical Portrait of Death Education.‖ Death Education 1:57–84. 64. Prothero, Stephen. 2001. Purified by Fire: A History of Cremation in America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 12 Reviews of Literature Impact Factor : 1.4716 (UIF) Volume 2 , Issue 4 / Nov 2014 ISSN:-2347-2723 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 65. Riley, John W., Jr., ed. 1963. ―Social Research and Life Insurance.‖ American Behavioral Scientist (special issue).6(9). 66. Rivers,W. H. [1911] 1926. ―The Primitive Conception of Death.‖ Pp. 36–50 in Psychology and Ethnology. London, England: Routledge. 67. Rivers, W. H. 1926. ―The Primitive Conception of Death,‖ Pp. 36–50 in Psychology and Ethnology, by W. H. P. Rivers (edited with a preface and introduction by G. Elliot Smith). London: Kegan Paul, French, Trubner & Co., Ltd. 68. Rosenberg, Jerome and Dennis L. Peck. 2003. ―Megadeaths: Individual Reaction and Social Response to Massive Loss of Life.‖ Pp. 223–35 in Handbook of Death and Dying, edited by C. D. Bryant. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 69. Salamone, Jerome J. 1972. ―The Funeral Home as a Work System: A Sociological Analysis.‖ Pp. 164–77 in The Social Dimensions of Work, edited by C. D. Bryant. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 70. Shneidman, Edwin S. 1976. Death: Current Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield. 71. Smith,Walter J. 1985. Dying in the Human Life Cycle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 72. Stannard, David E. 1977. The Puritan Way of Death: A Study in Religion, Culture, and Social Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 73. Stephenson, John S. 1985. Death, Grief, and Mourning. New York: Free Press. 74. Sudnow, David. 1967. Passing On. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 75. Suzuki, Hikaru. 2001. Price of Death: The Funeral Industry in Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 76. Taylor, Richard P., ed. 2000. Death and the Afterlife: A Cultural Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. 77. Tylor, E. B. 1926. Anthropology. New York: D. Appleton. Vernon, Glenn M. 1970. Sociology of Death. New York: Ronald Press. 78. Vinitzky-Seroussi, Vered and Eyal Ben-Ari. 2000. ―‗A Knock on the Door‘: Managing Death in the Israeli Defense Forces.‖ The Sociological Quarterly 41(3):391–411. 79. Warner, W. Lloyd. 1959. The Living and the Dead. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 80. Wass, Hannelore. 1979. Dying: Facing the Facts. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. 81. Waugh, Evelyn. 1948. The Loved One. Boston, MA: Little Brown. 82. Wilcox, Sandra Galdieri and Marilyn Sutton. 1977. Understanding Death and Dying. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield. 83. Worden, J. W. 1982. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Practitioner. New York: Springfield. Ashok Shivaji Yakkaldevi Assistant Professor A.R. Burla Vartishta Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Solapur. Reviews of Literature • Volume 2 Issue 4 • Nov 2014 13