REGFOOD’s achievements and lessons learned Anton Petrenko, PhD Major trends in food systems The 1960s: Rapid advance in agricultural development in industrialized countries with the green revolution (involving large-scale mechanization and use of chemicals) The 1980s: Increasing public awareness of environmental protection and sustainable development The 1990s - present: Increasing globalization of the food system due to increases in long-distance food trade, global concentration in food processing and retail industries and diet change Growth in food production: 1960 - 2000 Globalization = intensive agriculture and industrial production in BACKGROUND Globalization = local and regional food production Increased interest among customers, producers and authorities in food that is environmentally and economically sustainable Opportunity for the South Baltic region to promote local and regional food production to contribute to its economic development and competitiveness Initial model for REGFOOD’s intervention To design education on “local food” Local producer Economy Public health To strengthen professional network Local consumer Environment Rational for Regfood’s strategy REGFOOD project partners REGFOOD’s target group 1 Producers of local and regional food and food network managers REGFOOD’s target group 2 Students and instructors in higher education institutions Strengthen liaisons between higher education and local food producers in the South Baltic region ACHIEVEMENTS Research Education of students • Concept paper • E-learning platform • Academic publications • Pilot course • Anthology • Syllabus for on-line course • Educational programs at partner institutions Capacity-building Of food producers • Workshop for food network managers PUTTI NG L OCAL FOOD ON THE T ABLE: ENHANCI NG COM PETI TI V ENESS OF PRODUCERS OF L OCAL AND REGI ONAL FOOD I N THE SOUTH BALTI C REGI ON Anton Petrenko, Philipp Brinkman, and Viktoria Olsson ISBN: 978-87-997614-0-1 ã 2014 REGFOOD Pilot training course in Kristianstad June 2014 Syllabus for the generic course on local and regional food Workshop for food network Managers in Copenhagen February 2015 Lessons learned Relevance of local food to South Baltic region Documentation through field research that the concept of “local and regional food”, while different from “ecological food” and “slow food”, is relevant for food producers in the South Baltic region Model for promotion of local food Promotion strategy 1 Innovative marketing of local food Product cost position Low High Unique product quality Unique product quality Low High Low Low High (1) (2) (3) (4) Low-cost broad strategy Best-cost broad differentiation strategy N/A High-cost broad differentiation strategy (Standard industrial food producers) Scope of the target market High (I nnovative local food producer) (5) (6) (7) (8) Low-cost focused strategy Best-cost focused differentiation strategy N/A High-cost focused differentiation strategy (I nnovative local food producer) (Standard local food producers) Promotion strategy 2 Capacity building of food producers • Horizontal networking of local food producers (SMEs) enhances their capacity to share knowledge, risks and costs and thereby increase their competitiveness • Strengthening capacities and skills of local food producers to self-organize via informal and formal horizontal networks • Building capacity of local food producers to conduct on a regular basis strategic planning Promotion strategy 3 Educational programs for students • It is documented that the local food segment in the South Baltic region needs highly educated and skilled workforce that is trained in modern business management • Increasing levels of competence and skills of students in business management and marketing through development of focused educational programs in areas of marketing, supply-chain management, and business strategy Promotion strategy 4 Developing vertical strategic partnerships • Establishing and maintaining broad strategic partnership among local food producers and regional authorities • Increasing awareness of legislators and regulators about needs and concerns of producers of local food and about positive impact of local food production on local economy, health of the community, and cultural identity