A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language

A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language - N...
This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution
to your colleagues, clients or customers here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears next to any article. Visit
www.nytreprints.com for samples and additional information. Order a reprint of this article now.
March 21, 2012
How Do You Say ‘Disagreement’ in
In his 2008 memoir, “Don’t Sleep, There Are Snakes,” the linguist Dan Everett recalled the
night members of the Pirahã — the isolated Amazonian hunter-gatherers he first visited as a
Christian missionary in the late 1970s — tried to kill him.
Dr. Everett survived, and his life among the Pirahã, a group of several hundred living in
northwest Brazil, went on mostly peacefully as he established himself as a leading scholarly
authority on the group and one of a handful of outsiders to master their difficult language.
His life among his fellow linguists, however, has been far less idyllic, and debate about his
scholarship is poised to boil over anew, thanks to his ambitious new book, “Language: The
Cultural Tool,” and a forthcoming television documentary that presents an admiring view of
his research among the Pirahã along with a darkly conspiratorial view of some of his critics.
In 2005 Dr. Everett shot to international prominence with a paper claiming that he had
identified some peculiar features of the Pirahã language that challenged Noam Chomsky’s
influential theory, first proposed in the 1950s, that human language is governed by
“universal grammar,” a genetically determined capacity that imposes the same fundamental
shape on all the world’s tongues.
The paper, published in the journal Current Anthropology, turned him into something of a
popular hero but a professional lightning rod, embraced in the press as a giant killer who
had felled the mighty Chomsky but denounced by some fellow linguists as a fraud, an
attention seeker or worse, promoting dubious ideas about a powerless indigenous group
while refusing to release his data to skeptics.
The controversy has been simmering in journals and at conferences ever since, fed by a slow
trickle of findings by researchers who have followed Dr. Everett’s path down to the Amazon.
In a telephone interview Dr. Everett, 60, who is the dean of arts and sciences at Bentley
1 of 5
28/03/12 10:44
A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language - N...
University in Waltham, Mass., insisted that he’s not trying to pick a fresh fight, let alone
present himself as a rival to the man he calls “the smartest person I’ve ever met.”
“I’m a small fish in the sea,” he said, adding, “I do not put myself at Chomsky’s level.”
Still, he doesn’t shy from making big claims for “Language: The Cultural Tool,” published
last week by Pantheon. “I am going beyond my work with Pirahã and systematically
dismantling the evidence in favor of a language instinct,” he said. “I suspect it will be
extremely controversial.”
Even some of Dr. Everett’s admirers fault him for representing himself as a lonely voice of
truth against an all-powerful Chomskian orthodoxy bent on stopping his ideas dead. It’s
certainly the view advanced in the documentary, “The Grammar of Happiness,” which
accuses unnamed linguists of improperly influencing the Brazilian government to deny his
request to return to Pirahã territory, either with the film crew or with a research team from
M.I.T., led by Ted Gibson, a professor of cognitive science. (It’s scheduled to run on the
Smithsonian Channel in May.)
Dr. Everett acknowledged that he had no firsthand evidence of any intrigues against him.
But Miguel Oliveira, an associate professor of linguistics at the Federal University of Alagoas
and the M.I.T. expedition’s Brazilian sponsor, said in an interview that Dr. Everett is widely
resented among scholars in Brazil for his missionary past, anti-Chomskian stance and
ability to attract research money.
“This is politics, everybody knows that,” Dr. Oliveira said. “One of the arguments is that he’s
stealing something from the indigenous people to become famous. It’s not said. But that’s
the way they think.”
Claims of skullduggery certainly add juice to a debate that, to nonlinguists, can seem arcane.
In a sense what Dr. Everett has taken from the Pirahã isn’t gold or rare medicinal plants but
recursion, a property of language that allows speakers to embed phrases within phrases —
for example, “The professor said Everett said Chomsky is wrong” — infinitely.
In a much-cited 2002 paper Professor Chomsky, an emeritus professor of linguistics at
M.I.T., writing with Marc D. Hauser and W. Tecumseh Fitch, declared recursion to be the
crucial feature of universal grammar and the only thing separating human language from its
evolutionary forerunners. But Dr. Everett, who had been publishing quietly on the Pirahã
for two decades, announced in his 2005 paper that their language lacked recursion, along
with color terms, number terms, and other common properties of language. The Pirahã, Dr.
2 of 5
28/03/12 10:44
A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language - N...
Everett wrote, showed these linguistic gaps not because they were simple-minded, but
because their culture — which emphasized concrete matters in the here and now and also
lacked creation myths and traditions of art making — did not require it.
To Dr. Everett, Pirahã was a clear case of culture shaping grammar — an impossibility
according to the theory of universal grammar. But to some of his critics the paper was really
just a case of Dr. Everett — who said he began questioning his own Chomskian ideas in the
early 1990s, around the time he began questioning his faith — fixing the facts around his
new theories.
In 2009 the linguists Andrew Nevins, Cilene Rodrigues and David Pesetsky, three of the
fiercest early critics of Dr. Everett’s paper, published their own in the journal Language,
disputing his linguistic claims and expressing “discomfort” with his overall account of the
Pirahã’s simple culture. Their main source was Dr. Everett himself, whose 1982 doctoral
dissertation, they argued, showed clear evidence of recursion in Pirahã.
“He was right the first time,” Dr. Pesetsky, an M.I.T. professor, said in an interview. “The
first time he had reasons. The second time he had no reasons.”
Some scholars say the debate remains stymied by a lack of fresh, independently gathered
data. Three different research teams, including one led by Dr. Gibson that traveled to the
Pirahã in 2007, have published papers supporting Dr. Everett’s claim that there are no
numbers in the Pirahã language. But efforts to go recursion hunting in the jungle — using
techniques that range from eliciting sentences to having the Pirahã play specially designed
video games — have so far yielded no published results.
Still, some have tried to figure out ways to press ahead, even without direct access to the
Pirahã. After Dr. Gibson’s team was denied permission to return to Brazil in 2010, its
members devised a method that minimized reliance on Dr. Everett’s data by analyzing
instead a corpus of 1,000 sentences from Pirahã stories transcribed by another missionary
in the region.
Their analysis, presented at the Linguistic Society of America’s annual meeting in January,
found no embedded clauses but did uncover “suggestive evidence” of recursion in a more
obscure grammatical corner. It’s a result that is hardly satisfying to Dr. Everett, who
questions it. But his critics, oddly, seem no more pleased.
Dr. Pesetsky, who heard the presentation, dismissed the whole effort as biased from the
start by its reliance on Dr. Everett’s grammatical classifications and basic assumptions.
3 of 5
28/03/12 10:44
A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language - N...
“They were taking for granted the correctness of the hypothesis they were trying to
disconfirm,” he said.
But to Dr. Gibson, who said he does not find Dr. Everett’s cultural theory of language
persuasive, such responses reflect the gap between theoretical linguists and data-driven
cognitive scientists, not to mention the strangely calcified state of the recursion debate.
“Chomskians and non-Chomskians are weirdly illogical at times,” he said. “It’s like they just
don’t want to have a cogent argument. They just want to contradict what the other guy is
Dr. Everett’s critics fault him for failing to release his field data, even seven years after the
controversy erupted. He countered that he is currently working to translate his decades’
worth of material and hopes to post some transcriptions online “over the next several
months.” The bigger outrage, he insisted, is what he characterized as other scholars’ efforts
to accuse him of “racist research” and interfere with his access to the Pirahã.
Dr. Rodrigues, a professor of linguistics at the Pontifical Catholic University in Rio de
Janeiro, acknowledged by e-mail that in 2007 she wrote a letter to Funai, the Brazilian
government agency in charge of indigenous affairs, detailing her objections to Dr. Everett’s
linguistic research and to his broader description of Pirahã culture.
She declined to elaborate on the contents of the letter, which she said was written at Funai’s
request and did not recommend any particular course of action. But asked about her overall
opinion of Dr. Everett’s research, she said, “It does not meet the standards of scientific
evidence in our field.”
Whatever the reasons for Dr. Everett’s being denied access, he’s enlisting the help of the
Pirahã themselves, who are shown at the end of “The Grammar of Happiness” recording an
emotional plea to the Brazilian government.
“We love Dan,” one man says into the camera. “Dan speaks our language.”
4 of 5
28/03/12 10:44
A New Book and Film About Rare Amazonian Language - N...
5 of 5
28/03/12 10:44