HISTORY 386A Introduction Land Journey to Korean peninsula People Topics of Korean History Crossroad Unity-division Contrasts/extremes Center-periphery Korean peninsula under attack Arena of conflicts Continuity and change Kim Jong Un, 2012 Kim Il Sung, 1945 History as national narrative Multiple histories, affected by nationality, period in history, power, ideology (North-South) History as identity, myth, and political agenda Myth and Archeology Tang’un, Kochoson, 2333 BC, mythological racial origin First recorded reference to Kochoson during the first century BC; first record of Tang’un in Samguk Yusa (13th century) Korea’s national spirit (minjokhon) and its ongoing historical struggle defines Korea’s national identity as a homogenous race (tan’il), unified state, and indigenous culture distinctly separate from those of China and Japan Racial history of suffering: Korean identity was formed by instilling a collective sense of destiny as victims of superpower politics and foreign invasions since time immemorial Prehistory First pottery on the peninsula from 8000 BC Jeulmun (comb-patterned) Pottery Period, 8000BC2000BC: decorated vessels; hunting, gathering, and small-scale cultivation of plants Mumun (plain-patterned) Pottery Period, 1500 BC – 300 BC: plain cooking and storage vessels; smallscale shifting cultivation ("slash-and-burn") was practiced in addition to a variety of other subsistence strategies; origins of intensive agriculture and complex societies Classic Jeulmun vessel, 3500 BC Storage vessel, Middle Mumun, 8 c. BC Kochoson 108 BC Kochoson (Ancient Choson) civilization: evidence during the transition from Jeulmun to Mumun periods, around 1500 BC Archeological findings point to 7th-4th centuries BC Kochoson, confederation of walled cities; Puyo 2nd century – 494 AD, Manchuria and parts of North Korea Groups of semi-sedentary small-scale agriculturalists occupied most of the Korean Peninsula Proto Three Kingdoms period, between Kochoson and the maturation of the three kingdoms; 108 BC, Puyo, Koguryo, Okcho, and Tongye Koguryo was established in 37 BC; absorbed the last Chinese commandery in 313 In the south, loose confederacies Jinhan, Puyohan and Mahan (Samhan) Proto Three Kingdoms Paekche was founded in 18 BC in Mahan territory and began to overtake it Silla was founded by the unification of six chiefdoms within the Jinhan in 57 BC Kaya confederacy absorbed Puyohan and later was annexed by Silla Lelang commandery, 108 BC – 313 AD Korean states The process of state formation on the Korean peninsula was initiated by Han invasion and the establishment of Lelang commandery (108 BC – AD 313) Foundation for inter- and intra-regional dynamics in the exchange of goods and information; economic exchange and competition between Lelang and Samhan Peer polity interaction (Renfrew): state formation is intelligible only in terms of multiple units and regions; in China Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties probably overlapped one another rather than succeeding one other through warfare and annihilation Three kingdoms are the first entities historically and archeologically that can be regarded as states on the Korean peninsula: Koguryo, Paekche and Shilla Koguryo: 37 BC-668 AD (476) Silla: 57 BC-935 AD (576) Koguryo tomb mural Silla, 57 BC-918 AD The authority of the throne was generally restricted by the vestiges of a tribal type council, the most prominent example of which was the hwabaek council of Silla Silla unified most of the three kingdoms after defeating Koguryo in 668 Even after unification, Silla kings had to deal with the “bone-rank” aristocrats, powerful local magnates, and regional military commanders Koryo: 918-1392 (1374) Founder Wang Kon Koryo, 918-1392 Despite the development of centralized administration, kings were subjected to the influence of strong aristocratic clans Wang Kon’s strategy was to ally himself with other powerful and prestigious groups through marriage ties. He contracted marriages with no fewer than 29 daughters of important strongmen and old Silla aristocrats After 1170, military men seized power, and from 1196 to 1258 Koryo kings were hardly more than puppets of in the hands of military-aristocratic Ch’oe family, which passed its shogunal type authority down hereditarily though four generations From the mid-13th century the royal house reached the nadir of subjugation under the rule of the Mongol invaders who lowered the royal prestige Koryo - tributary state of Yuan dynasty, 1259-1392 Confucianization of Korea United Silla introduced examination system in 788, influence from Tang Wang Kon surrounded by Confucian advisors; examination system in 958 with Chinese assistance Coexistence of Three Teachings like in China: Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism Confucians started to advocate reforms beyond school system: Confucian values to shape society Tolerance toward Buddhism ended in the 14th century Yuan Confucians occupied themselves with practical matters; Yi Che-hyon and the new creed of “concrete (solid) learning,” sirhak Choson: 1392-1910 Founder Yi Song-gye From Koryo to Choson The creation of Choson dynasty was culmination of effort to create centralized bureaucratic polity (since the 10th century) Toward the 14th c. reform-minded yangban realized that they dependent on strong and effective central regime, as their power derived from status as officials Yi Song-gye and his associates integrated into yangban through political alliances and marriage ties Access of state to greater share of resources, Rank Land Law (1391) Rank Land Law did not alter the basic pattern of yangban estate ownership, but sharply reduced the amount of land given out as sajon (private field, lands whose tax receipts went to officials who provided services to the state) Greatly increased the amount designated as general revenue kongjon (public field, lands whose tax receipts went to the government) Confiscation of lands and slaves owned by Buddhist temples Enhancement of throne’s authority; abolition of Todang (deliberative council) and dispersal of bureaucratic power among several independent agencies represented substantial enhancement of the throne’s authority But the kings were unable to break the old tradition of aristocratic control over land and people; early Choson kings had to secure support from strongly aristocratic yangban class (for example, Ming T’aitsu created new ruling class in China) Strengthening local administration by highranking governors Triumph of central bureaucratic aristocracy over local hyangni-based system of Silla-Koryo transition Yangban (two ranks – munban, scholarly, and muban, martial) – nobility: hereditary nature and landed base, but also mixed with examinations and civil service system; yangban consisted of scholar officials and local gentry Neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism/Chen-Chu Learning: Chu Hsi (1130-1200) and Chen I (1033-1107): Tao is expressed by principle li which is perfect but mixed with matter qi More practical observational science, investigation of things Ancient Style Learning with its emphasis on a strong state and knowledge of the classics was also popular in Koryo Choson founders did not favor a program of social reconstruction through self-cultivation and local autonomy (promoted Chen-Chu Learning) Influence of Chu Hsi’s ideas of moral leadership of king; revitalizing Confucian learning Activist state (reforms through state institutions) – well established Ancient Learning tradition in Koryo and Northern Sung Neo-Confucian Transformation Human nature can be perfected without regardless whether it is originally good or bad; it can be purified with action Rites and rituals are key transformatory factors Li rites (Chou li) created ideal society by sage kings in China (ideology looking to the past for inspiration) Yangban found support for their aristocratic traditions in Confucianism’s emphasis on bloodline and genealogies Patrilinial lineage system became foundation of Confucianization Ancestral cult became ideological ground for transformation: clarified the lines of descent Lineages as expression of status and prestige (in China built on property) Neo-Confucians (sa) in early Choson claimed social and political eminence in quest for power, and became officeholders (sadaebu) Yangban derived their power and prestige from their status as officials of the state: further bureaucratization Mixture of ascriptive status criteria (lineages) and meritocracy through state-sponsored examination system “Social passport” – the four ancestors (sajo), three lineal ascendants and his maternal grandfather; if only “clean” on maternal side gave access to the official world; that is why sadaebu refused to take primary wives from lower classes Korea’s “spinal cord” model: senior line persists During Choson 750 descent groups in the civil examination; only 39 lineages represented 53 percent of all passers Lineage system prevented complete centralization; aristocratic lineages largely determined the political tenor of the dynasty Social stratification: yangban, sangmin (commoners), and ch’onmin (lowborn people, including slaves); fourth group chungin (middle class) Social discrimination intensified in the 16th century: line between yangban and commoners became more rigid Choson literati, Writing poem Gang Hui-an (1417-1464) Literati house, Choson Korea Ingok Retreat Chong Son,1676-1759 Women on Tano Day, by Shin Yun Bok, early 19 c. Scenes from Daily Life, Kim Hong Do, 1745 - ? Korean beauty Spinning and weaving Horsemen Traveling by boat Local musicians A dance Drawing water from a well Recording an event Evening Bell from Mist-Shrouded Temple and Autumn Moon over Lake Dongting , 15 c. Landscapes Dance with two knives, by Shin Yun Bok, early 19 c. Kisaeng women, Yu Un Hong, 19 c. Kisaeng Hwang Jin-i, 16 c., played by South Korean actress Ha Ji Won ID Questions 1. Yangban 2. Civil Service Examination System Discussion group Neo-Confucian Transformation of Korea What is the significance of Confucianism in politics and daily life in Choson Korea? What feature(s) do you find fundamental in defining Korea’s Confucianism? Is there a link between Confucianism and modernity?