Abstract
Hsli
Chih-mo
emphatically
the
talked
English
the
This
of
the
in
examining
The
mo's
as
It
early
talent,
then
to
a
translations
and
quantity,
stories,
those
are
similarities
specific
three
experience.
her
cf
number,
in
in
periods
order
theme,
techniques.
Works
of
with
different
with
her
and
both
and
in
quality
demerits,
own
short
relation
demonstrate
to
their
as
career
and
practices.
His
periods
beauty
work,
merits
his
from
exceptional
in
studied
s
Chih-
himself
of
literary
his
h-mo'
Hs1
contacts
Mansfield.
to
accordance
from
of
characterization
His
in
examination
their
are
and
Chi
Mansfield.
significant
for
English
through
beliefs
works,
On
Hst
Katherine
literary
discussed
Mansfield
of
story
translator
her
in
scope
woman
in
comparative
transformed
a
felt
person
one
short
had
as
understanding
eleven
of
her
of
of
his
he
admiring
follower
His
for
of
an
had
the
HstVs
intellectual
how
an
the
with
shows
to
and
of
as
register
explore
with
well
worshiper
and
and
realm
starts
personal
Mansfield.
nature
and
Mansfield.
in
to
relationship
thesis
work
proposes
the
his
to
at
noted
he
Katherine
failed
particular
have
interest
writer
have
study
achievement
an
they
biographers
unusual
influences
writing.
aspect
the
story
hand,
writer's
and
of
short
other
woman
critics
many
well
is
Mansfield
as
divided
into
translation
are
discussed
in
juxtapostion
with
one
similarities
had
occurred
influence.
By
causes
for
into
way
such
the
in
which
story
of
maturity
Hst
i
s
nnovati
with
a
West.
His
form
and
interior
symbols
parallel
in
intensity.
short
works
fictional
motifs,
his
time,
He
had
literary
depiction
had
use
was
not
touched
tradition.
of
height
the
obvious
even
point
great
are
unknown
than
of
entirely
in
far
the
techniques,
exceptional
as
in
rather
modern
not
1920s-China
emerging
internal
techniques
a
a
his
shifting
written
but,
formal
in
just
though
career,
and
was
monologue,
and
through
show
in
with
his
A
developing
works
experimenting
concern
events
written.
that,
was
chiefly
which
primary
particularly
and
was
looking
personal
were
last
the
independence.
lies
He
as
reveals
His
relative
by
works
Hst
Mansfieldian
explores
well
further
own.
significance
literary
s
him
his
and
veness.
external
h-mo'
of
of
paper
as
Mansfield,
art
a
relationship
Chi
following
these
of
the
HsU-Mansfield
HsU
that
because
conclusion,
reading
consciously
indicate
intellectual,
chronological
signs
a
to
mainly
of
political,
contexts
short
another
without
its
works
as
vie%k.
extent
in
his
and
rather
psychological
concerned,
before
his
in
the
last
Chinese