A New National Government: “We the People” Lesson 11 pp 93-100 Articles of Confederation Prep Key Terms: Delegates: A person chosen to act or represent others Confederation: Loose alliance among sovereign states: 1776-1789 Confederation Congress: Legislative branch under the Articles of Confederation. Unicameral (1 house and 1 branch) National Government (central): Organization of having central political authority in a nation Questions: 1. Why did the Founders believe a national government was necessary? To unify the states and to conduct the Revolutionary War. 2. Why did the people of the new independent states fear a strong national government? People feared a strong national government because they believed that the British government had taken away the people’s rights. They wanted to stay away from a central government with too much power. At the same time they worried that each state will be more powerful 3. What were the Articles of Confederation? First Constitution of the nation that created our first national government. Created in 1777 and ratified (signed in 1781 to 1789) 4. How did the Articles organize the national government to address the fears of the people and the states? By creating only a legislative branch, Congress had little power over the states and their citizens, and every action of Congress had to have the consent, approval, and cooperation of the states. Each state was given one vote in Congress and that 9 out of 13 states must agree on all important matters. What parts of the government were not included in the Articles of Confederation? Executive & Judicial 5. What did the national government achieve under the Articles of Confederation? Northwest ordinance—movement West Declare war—Revolutionary War Deal with foreign trade Articles of Confederation & Shay’s Rebellion--Class Outline (Review of questions on the front) Colonies united by Central Government=National Government I. States Fear: 1. Too much power to central government 2. Afraid that some states will have too much power over others II. Articles of Confederation: after much debate at the continental congress, they (framers) created a legislature. Confederation=alliance of independent nations Confederation Congress: Central Legislative Branch Solve the fears: 1. Unicameral (1 house/1branch)—no executive or judicial 2. Congress will be weaker to limit its powers 3. Each state has only 1 vote no matter the size Main achievements: a. Northwest Ordinance: people of the Northwestern lands have the right to organize their own government as long as they follow the following: 1. Set up Basic Rights; 2. Outlaw slavery; 3. Region divided into smaller territories. (than they can be asked to be admitted as a new state) **build empire** b. c. d. e. Declare war Appoint military officers Make laws (states recognizing others) Negotiated foreign treaty Problems: Create a weak National government LOOSE ALLIANCE AMONG STATES a. Little economic power (can’t collect taxes; had to borrow money from the states) b. No power over the states (can’t enforce laws…no executive branch) c. No executive or judicial branch III. Shay’s Rebellion Leader: Daniel Shays Followers: Farmers (2,000 in MA) Reason: State not protecting their rights (economic problems)-taking away farms, raising taxes Results: National Government is too weak; the Articles of Confederation is not working; need to revise: Constitutional Convention 1787 Opinion Question: (write your response in your notebook section) When Thomas Jefferson heard about Shay’s Rebellion, he wrote: “The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on occasion that I wish it to be always kept alive.” Do you think shay’s Rebellion was good for the United States? Explain (open ended paragraph format) ~Good: focused attention on problems of the Articles of Confederation and forced leaders to resolve them; Purpose of government—protect people, if people don’t like it, they change it! Need for a new government in which it is a democracy (for the people, by the people) ~Not Good: it could have destabilized the young nation (could have fallen apart); peaceful measures need to be taken to make the changes—not a war