STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
REGISTERED
Smt. Sonia Wadhwa,
W/o Shri Rajinder Kumar Gaba,
# 25, Friends Colony,
Beside Capital Bank, Kapurthala.
Complainant
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.
Respondent
CC - 3202/2011
Present:
Smt. Sonia Wadhwa, Complainant, in person.
Shri Sunil Nayyar, Legal Advisor, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing.
2.
In this case, Smt. Sonia Wadhwa filed an application dated
17.08.2011 with the Registrar, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar for seeking
photo copies of her answer sheets(B.Ed Session 2010-2011, Roll No. 65723)of
all subjects and copy of practical numbers allotted by college and criteria of
allotting assessment number to various subjects by University. Shri Inderjit
Singh, Registrar/Information Officer, Guru Nanak Dev University , Amritsar sent
a reply to the applicant vide letter No. 1489/R dated 02.09.2011, which reads as
under:“ T[go'es ft;/ ;pzXh nkg ih tb'A okJhN N{ fJzBcow/;B n?eN nXhB wzrh rJh ;{uBk$d;skt/iK d/ ;pzX
ftu ;{fus ehsk iKdk j? fe Tso-gZsohnK
Contd……p/2
CC - 3202/2011
-2-
dhnK ekghnK confidential Nature dhnK j'D eoe/ nkoHNhHnkJhH n?eN d/ ;?e;B 8(1)
nB[;ko w[jZJhnk BjhA eotkJhnK ik ;edhnK.”
At this the Complainant vide her letter dated 12.09.2011 sent a copy of the
Supreme Court’s judgement dated 09.08.2011 to the Registrar, Guru Nanak Dev
University, Amritsar informing that the court has allowed the disclosure of the
answer sheets to the examinee under RTI Act. She further requested to provide
her the photocopies of answer sheets within specified time as per RTI Act. In
response to this letter, Shri Inderjit Singh, Registrar/Information Officer, Guru
Nanak Dev University, Amritsar sent a reply to the applicant vide letter No.
1585/R dated 15.09.2011, which reads as under:“T[go'es ft;/ ;pzXh nkg ih tb'A okJhN N{ fJzBcow/;B n?eN nXhB T[so-gZsoh G/iD bJh
ehsh rJh p/Bsh ;pzXh ;{fus ehsk iKdk j? T[-nfXekohnK tb'A j'J/ nkd/;K nB[;ko tZy tZy
e'o;K d./ gqhfynkoEh Bshik fBebD s'A fszB jcs/ d/ nzdo-nzdo 10,000$- o[gJ/ gqsh T[sogZsoh ch; iwQK eotk e/ T[so-gZsoh t/y ;ed/ jB. fJj th ;{fus ehsk iKdk j? fe fJ; ;pzXh nrb/oh
ekotkJh bJh gq'c?;o fJzukoi (gqhfynktK) ih Bkb ;zgoe ehsk ikt/. “
Not satisfied with the reply of the Registrar, Guru Nanak Dev University,
Amritsar, Smt. Sonia Wadhwa filed a complaint with the Commission on
Contd……p/3
CC - 3202/2011
-3-
29.10.2011, which was received in the Commission on 03.11.2011. Accordingly,
Notice of Hearing through Video Conferencing was issued to both the parties for
today.
3.
During course of hearing today, Shri Sunil Nayyar, Legal Advisor
appearing on behalf of the Respondent states that in view of
Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India judgement dated 09.08.2011 in Civil Appeal No. 6454 of 2011, as
per para 27 and 28 of it, the University is willing to allow inspection of answer
sheets by the Complainant as per University Rules.
4.
After hearing both the parties, the Respondent is directed to get
the Complainant Smt. Sonia Wadhwa, inspected her answer sheets within 10
days for which fee would be charged as per Punjab Right to Information Rules,
2007 and inspection be carried out on a mutually agreed date and time. The
inspection of answer sheets be got done without disclosing the identity of the
examiners/co-ordinators/scrutinisers/head examiners which are exempted from
disclosure under Section 8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005 on the ground that if such
information is disclosed, it may endanger their physical safety. The answer
sheets to be shown should not contain any information or signature of
examiners/co-ordinators/scrutinisers/head examiners which are exempted from
disclosure under the above Section 8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005. At the same time
the Respondent is directed to disclose the practical /assessment marks to the
Contd…..p/4
CC - 3202/2011
-4-
Complainant without disclosing the identity etc. of the concerned examiners as
mentioned above.
5.
So far as the demand of the Complainant for issue of certified
copies of answer sheets is concerned, the Respondent is directed
to make a
written submission in this regard in support of their contention within a period of
15 days , with a copy to the Complainant under registered cover, as in the
interest
of
natural
justice
it
was
not
possible
to
go
through
the
Rules/Regulations/Calendar of the University through Video Conferencing before
deciding the matter . The Complainant will also send her response, if any, with
a copy to the Respondent before the next date of hearing. After receiving
submissions from both the parties, the matter will be considered and decided on
the next date of hearing.
6.
The case is fixed for further hearing on 31.01.2012 at 11.00 A.M. in
the Chamber on the 3rd Floor of SCO No. 84-85, Sector: 17-C, Chandigarh.
7.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Smt. Manju Kochar,
W/o Shri Jatinder Mohan Chowdhary,
R/o # D6/780, Main Bazar,
Kot Khalsa, Amritsar.
Complainant
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o Principal,
Saroop Rani Govt. College for Women,
Mcleod Road, Rani Ka Bagh, Amritsar.
Respondent
CC - 3261/2011
Present:
Smt. Manju Kochar, Complainant, in person and Shri Jatinder Garg,
on behalf of the Complainant.
Dr. Mrs. Surinder, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In this case, Smt. Manju Kochar filed an application dated
05.09.2011 with the Principal, S.R. Govt. College for Women, Mcload Road ,
Rani Ka Bagh, Amritsar for seeking certain information regarding accreditation
of the said college. The Principal of the College vide Memo. No. 1313-15 dated
10.10.2011 refused to supply the information to the Complainant on the ground
that she has not done any public good after receiving the information vide her
earlier applications. Consequently, Smt. Manju Kochar filed a complaint with the
Commission vide her application dated 05.11.2011. Accordingly, Notice of
Contd…..p/2
CC - 3261/2011
-2-
Hearing through Video Conferencing was issued to both the parties for today.
3.
During hearing today. Dr. Mrs. Surinder, appearing on behalf of the
Respondent hands over requisite information to the Complainant, who is
satisfied.
It is conveyed to the Respondent with concern that
the
refusal
conveyed by the Principal to the Complainant vide Memo. No. 1313-15, dated
10.10.2011 is not in good spirit being violative of provisions of RTI Act, 2005
wherein ensuring transparency in the working of Public Authority is the main
goal.
4.
However, since the information now stands provided, the case is
disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Balwinder Singh,
S/o Shri Nirmal Singh,
R/o Village: Roran Wala Alia Tare Wala,
Tehsil: Fazilka, District: Ferozepur.
Complainant
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o Deputy Commissioner,
Ferozepur.
Respondent
CC - 3173/2011
Present:
Shri Balwinder Singh, Complainant, in person.
Shri Ramesh Kumar, AEE Fazilka, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In this case, Shri Balwinder Singh filed an RTI application dated nil
with the PIO of the office of Deputy Commissioner, Ferozepur for seeking details
of assets possessed by Shri Vipan Kumar, J.E. Jalalabad , now Additional
Assistant Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation, Mandi Ladhuka, Tehsil &
District: Fazilka. Shri Yash Pal Grover, appearing on behalf of the Respondent
states that since application related to Power Corporation, the same was sent
back to the Complainant. At this, Shri Balwinder Singh filed a complaint with the
Commission vide his application dated 06.08.2011. Accordingly, Notice of
Hearing through Video Conferencing was issued to both the parties for today.
Contd…..p/2
CC - 3173/2011
3.
-2-
After hearing both the parties and going through the case file, I am
convinced that the application
filed by Shri Balwinder Singh is merely a
complaint against Shri Vipan Kumar, Additional Assistant Engineer, Punjab State
Power Corporation and does not fall within the definition of information as per
provision of Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005. Therefore, the complainant is
advised to file a fresh application with the concerned PIO of the Punjab State
Power Corporation for seeking specific information, if he so desires.
4.
In view of this fact, the instant case is disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Harinder Paul Dhingra, Junior Assistant,
Q.No. 6-J, Canal Colony,
Abohar – 152116,
District: Fazilka.
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o Block Primary Education Officer,
Abohar -1, District: Fazilka.
Complainant
Respondent
CC - 3180/2011
Present:
Shri Harinder Pal, Complainant, in person.
Smt. Baldev Kaur, Teacher, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In this case, Shri Harinder Pal Dhingra filed an application dated
13.09.2011 with the PIO-cum-BPEO, Abohar-1 for seeking certain information at
three points regarding disbursement of stipend to SC girls students , copy of FIR
lodged with the police and a copy of anticipatory pension certificate issued to
SBI, Abohar in the pension case of Shri Raj Kumar, CHT, GPS, Himatpura. The
BPEO, Abohar-1 sent information to the Complainant vide Memo. No. 5257-58,
dated 27.01.2011. Not satisfied with the information supplied to him, Shri
Harinder Paul filed a complaint with the Commission vide his application dated
14.10.2011 stating that the information supplied to him is incomplete and vague.
Contd…..p/2
CC - 3180/2011
-2-
Accordingly, Notice of Hearing through Video Conferencing was issued to both
the parties for today.
3.
Smt. Baldev Kaur, Teacher, appearing on behalf of the Respondent
states that the information asked for at Sr. No. 1 and 2 has been supplied to the
Complainant and he is satisfied. As regard Sr. No. 3, she states that copy of
anticipatory Pension Certificate of Shri Raj KLumar, CHT, GPS, Himatpura
cannot be supplied because the Complainant Shri Harinder Paul Dhingra himself
is the dealing Assistant and the custodian of the relevant record and the same
is not traceable.
4.
Since the information, available in the record of Public Authority,
stands provided to the Complainant, the case is disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Mehtab Ram,
S/o Shri Hasrdit Ram,
R/0 # 2047, Dashmesh Nagar,
Near Asia Model School, Jalalabad – 152024,
District: Ferozepur.
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o District Education Officer(EE),
Ferozepur.
Complainant
Respondent
CC - 3181 /2011
Present:
Shri Mehtab Ram, Complainant, in person.
Shri Aman Sharma, Clerk, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In
this case, Shri Mehtab
Ram filed an RTI application dated
21.02.2011 with the PIO of the office of District Education Officer(EE), Ferozepur
for seeking information regarding the status of his medical reimbursement bill. On
receiving no information, he filed a complaint with the Commission
vide his
application dated 29.10.2011. Accordingly, Notice of Hearing through Video
Conferencing was issued to both the parties for today.
3.
The Respondent states that necessary action
in the medical
reimbursement case of the Complainant is being taken. Accordingly, Shri Tilak
Raj Khanna, Superintendent-cum-PIO, is directed to send a status report in this
Contd……p/2
CC - 3181 /2011
-2-
regard to the Complainant within 10 days. He is also directed to be present in
person on the next date of hearing along with a copy of the information so
supplied to the Complainant.
4.
The case is adjourned and fixed for further hearing on 31.01.2012
at 11.00 A.M. in the Chamber on the 3rd Floor of SCO No. 84-85, Sector: 17C, Chandigarh
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Inderjit,
S/o Shri Bagrawat Ram,
R/o Village: Seeto Guno Dhahni,
Police station: Bahaw Wala,
Tehsil: Abohar, District: Fazilka.
Complainant
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o Deputy Commissioner, Fazilka.
Respondent
CC - 3189/2011
Present:
None is present on behalf of the Complainant.
Smt. Mohinder Kaur, Senior Assistant, office of D.C. Ferozepur and
Shri Kuldeep Chand, SHO, P.S. Bahaw Wala , on behalf of the
Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In this case Shri Inderjit filed an RTI application dated 25.04.2011
with the PIO of the office of Deputy Commissioner, Ferozepur for seeking Action
Taken
Report on a letter
No. 3204, dated 30.09.2010 sent by National
Commission for Protection of Child Rights, New Delhi, to Deputy Commissioner,
Ferozepur The Deputy Commissioner Ferozepur while
transferring the
application to SSP Ferozepur under Section 6(3) of RTI Act, 2005 asked for a
report. On receiving no information, Shri Inderjit filed a complaint with the
Commission vide his application dated 02.11.2011. Accordingly, Notice of
Contd…..p/2
CC - 3189/2011
-2-
Hearing through Video Conferencing was issued to both the parties for today.
3.
Shri Kuldeep Chand, SHO, appearing on behalf of the Respondent
states that a case under Sections 323, 324 and 34 of IPC has been registered
against Shri Inderjit in the Police Station Bahaw Wala and D.S.P. Balluana has
conducted an inquiry into the matter and the allegations levelled against Shri
Inderjit stand proved. He further states that the matter is sub-judice in the
Punjab and Haryana High Court.
4.
Deputy Commissioner Ferozepur
has sent a copy of Inquiry
Report of DSP Balluana/SSP Ferozepur vide Endst. No. 1685, dated 12.12.2011
informing
the Commission that a copy of the Inquiry Report of DSP
Balluana/SSP Ferozepur has been sent to the Complainant
Complainant has been informed
and the
that no more information in the matter is
available in their office.
5.
The Complainant is not present and nothing has been heard from
him regarding non-receipt of requisite information, which shows that he has
received the information and is satisfied.
6.
Accordingly, the instant case is disposed of.
7.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, SECTOR-17-C,CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Kamaljit Batta,
S/o Farmah Homeo Store,
Opposite State Bank of India,
Ferozepur Cantt.
Vs
Public Information Officer,
O/o District & Sessions Judge, Ferozepur.
Complainant
Respondent
CC - 3250/2011
Present:
Shri Kamaljit Batta, Complainant, in person.
Shri
Ramesh Kumar, Superintendent, office of District and
Sessions Judge, Ferozepur , on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
This case has been heard through Video Conferencing today.
2.
In this case, Shri Kamaljit Batta filed an application dated
12.10.2011 with the PIO of the office of District and Sessions Judge , Ferozepur
for seeking Action Taken Report on his complaint dated 20.09.2011 against Shri
Karnail Singh, Ld. CJ(Sr. Divn.), Ferozepur and Nirmala Devi, Execution Clerk for
not issuing property attachment warrant of the JD as per Courts order dated
06.09.2011. The PIO-cum-Superintendent, District & Sessions Judge, Ferozepur
sent a reply to the Complainant vide letter No. 43/RTI, dated 22.10.2011, which
reads as under:“ It is intimated that complaint dated 20.09.2011 submitted by you
has been ordered to be filed by the Ld. District & Sessions Judge,
Ferozepur, vide order dated 12.10.2011.”
Contd…..p/2
CC - 3250/2011
-2-
Not satisfied with the reply of the PIO, Shri Kamaljit Batta filed a complaint with
the Commission on 05.11.2011. Accordingly, Notice of Hearing through Video
Conferencing was issued to both the parties for today.
3.
Shri Ramesh Kumar, Superintendent, office of District & Sessions
Judge, Ferozepur, appearing on behalf of the Respondent states that Notice of
Hearing from the Commission was received on 08.12.2011 and the information
was sent to the Complainant vide letter dated 09.12.2011. The Complainant
states that he has not received the information so far.
4.
Accordingly, Shri Ramesh Kumar, Superintendent, is directed that
one more copy of letters dated 22.10.2011 and 09.12.2011 be handed over to
the Complainant today after the hearing is over and he assures the Commission
for the same.
5.
A letter No. 50/RTI, dated 09.12.2011 has been received in the
Commission from the Superintendent, District & Sessions Judge, Ferozepur
enclosing a copy of the requisite information , which has been taken on record.
6.
In these circumstances, the case is disposed of.
7.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/(B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Anil Shah, s/o Shri Basant Lal Shah, ,
# 1464/11/36, Bazar Sandookan,
I/s Ghee Mandi,
Amritsar-143005.
Appellant
Vs.
1.The Public Information Officer,
O/O Improvement Trust,
Amritsar.
2. FAA Improvement Trust,
Respondent
Amritsar.
Respondent
AC No. 1136 of 2011
Present:
Shri Anil Shah, appellant, in person.
Shri Pramjit Singh Clerk, o/o Improvement Trust, Amritsar
on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video Conferencing.
2.
Appellant Shri Anil Shah, s/o Shri Basant Lal Shah,# 1464/11/36,
Bazar Sandookan, I/s Ghee Mandi,
Amritsar,
made an application dated
18.5.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 before the PIO –
cum- E.O. Improvement Trust, Amritsar for seeking certain information relating
to the
proprietorship of House No. 1464/11/36, Bazar Sandookan, I/s Ghee
Mandi Amritsar, etc On getting no response
from the PIO o/o Improvement
Trust, Amritsar within a stipulated period, he filed an appeal before the appellate
authority on 18.8.2011. APIO o/o Improvement Trust Amritsar sent information
on 14.9.2011. Not satisfied with the same, the complainant approached the State
contd…p/2
AC No. 1136 of 2011
-2-
Information Commission on 31.10.2011, Notice for hearing through
Video
Conferencing were issued to both the parties.
3.
The appellant who is present through Video Conferencing states
that the information provided is incomplete and incorrect.
4.
I have perused the reply sent to complainant and find that Copy of
Award for acquisition of land for Bazar Sandookan is stated to have been sent.
5.
In view of the above facts the PIO –cum Executive
Officer,
Improvement Trust Amritsar Shri Gurnam Singh is directed to send the specific,
relevant and correct information to the appellant, within a period of 10 days
under the registered cover. He is also directed to send one copy of the
information thus supplied to the appellant for Commission’s record.
6.
He is also directed to show cause in writing & personally on the
next date of hearing as to why the provisions of Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act,
2005 be not invoked for willfully delaying and denying the information to the
appellant within the specified period.
7.
To come up on 31.1.2012 at 11.00 A.M. for further hearing in the
chamber, 3rd Floor of SCO no. 84-85, , Sector 17-C, Chandigarh .
8.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina,
c/o White Hope Media, SCO 35-36,
Dainik Bhaskar Building, D-Block,
Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar.
Appellant
Vs.
1.The Public Information Officer,
O/O Senior Superintendent of Police,
(Rural), Amritsar.
Respondent
2. FAA Inspector General of Police
(Border Range), Amritsar.
Respondent
AC No. 1144 of 2011
Present:
Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina , appellant in person.
Shri Sardara Singh, D.S.P., on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video conferencing
2.
The Appellant Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina, made an application
dated 20.7.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 to the
S.S.P. Amritsar for seeking information relating to Police record of Mr. Dalbir
Singh Bira s/o Lt. Gurbaksh Singh r/o VPO Harsha Chhina Ucha Qila The.
Ajnala, District Amritsar, Police Station Raja Sansi. On getting on response from
the PIO, within sipulated period, he approached the Ist appellate Authority on
25.9.2011. On getting no information he approached the State Information
Contd……p/2
AC No. 1144 of 2011
-2-
Commission vide his application dated 4.11.11. Notice for hearing through Video
Conferencing were issued to both the parties.
2.
Today, Shri Sardara Singh, D.S.P appearing on behalf of
respondent stated through Video conferencing that necessary information has
been delivered to the appellant. The appellant acknowledges the
receipt of
information and is satisfied.
3.
In view of the above, the case is disposed of.
4.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina,
c/o White Hope Media, SCO 35-36,
Dainik Bhaskar Building, D-Block,
Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar.
Appellant
Vs.
1.The Public Information Officer,
O/O Senior Superintendent of Police,
(Rural), Amritsar.
Respondent
2. FAA Inspector General of Police
(Border Range), Amritsar.
Respondent
AC No. 1145 of 2011
Present:
Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina , appellant in person.
Shri Sardara Singh, D.S.P., on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video conferencing
2.
The Appellant Shri Prabhjeet Singh Chhina, made an application
dated 20.7.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 to the
S.S.P. (Rural) Amritsar for seeking information relating to Police record of Mr.
Surjit Singh Sita s/o Lt. Gurbaksh Singh r/o VPO Harsha Chhina Ucha Qila The.
Ajnala, District Amritsar, Police Station Raja Sansi. On getting on response from
the PIO, within sipulated period, he approached the Ist appellate Authority on
25.9.2011. On getting no information he approached the State Information
Commission vide his application dated 4.11.11. Notice for hearing through Video
Conferencing were issued to both the parties.
Contd…..p/2
AC No. 1145 of 2011
3.
-2-
Today, Shri Sardara Singh, D.S.P appearing on behalf of
respondent stated through Video conferencing that necessary information has
been delivered to the appellant. Appellant acknowledges the receipt of
information and is satisfied
4.
In view of the above, the case is disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Sd/Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Sunil Sood, s/o Late Shri O.P.Sood,
#142, Green Park Civil Lines,
Ludhiana-141001.
Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
O/O Sub Divisional Magistrate,
Ajnala, Distt. Amritsar.
Respondent.
CC No. 3187 of 2011
Present:
None on behalf of Shri Sunil Sood , Complainant is present.
Shri Jagmohan Singh, Naib Tehsildar, Ajnala, District Amritsar
present on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video Conferencing.
2.
The complainant Shri Sunil Sood, made an application dated
25.8.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 to the P.I.O. o/o
S.D.M. Ajnala, District Amritsar for seeking certain information pertaining to (1)
Whether the owner of vehicle No. PB-14-0009 has retained this Number for his
New Vehicle. (2) If retained, furnish full particulars of old Vehicle and New
Vehicle and New registration Number allotted to old vehicle. On getting no
response within stipulated period, he made a complaint with the Commission on
24.10.2011, received
on 28.10.2011. Notice for hearing through Video
Conferencing were issued to both the parties for today.
contd…p/2
CC No. 3187 of 2011
3.
-2-
Neither Shri Sunil Sood nor any representative on his behalf is
present today during hearing through Video Conferencing. Shri Jagmohan
Singh, Naib Tehsildar, Ajnala, District Amritsar appearing on behalf of the
respondent states that necessary information has been delivered to the
complainant. He further states that the complainant has acknowledged the
receipt of information through e-mail and is satisfied.
4.
An e-mail message has also been received from Sunil Sood
Complainant in this case, who has informed the Commission regarding the
receipt of required information by him.
5.
In view of it,case is disposed of and closed.
6.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Kuldip Chand, s/o Shri Durga Dass,
Vill. & P.O. Lahri Gujran,
Tehsil Pathankot, Distt. Gurdaspur.
Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
O/O Inspector General of Police,
(Border Range), Amritsar.
Respondent.
CC No. 3230 of 2011
Present:
Shri Kuldip Chand , Complainant, in person.
Shri Jagan Nath ,DSP (HQ), on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video Conferencing.
2
The complainant Shri Kuldip Chand, made an application dated
29.9.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 to the I.G.Border
Range, Amritsar for seeking certain information. On getting no response within stipulated
period, he approached this Commission on 30.9.2011, which received in its office on
4.11.2011. Notice for hearing through Video Conferencing were issued to both the
parties.
3.
To day, Shri Jagan Nath, DSP (HQ) appearing on behalf of the
respondent stated through Video Conferencing that necessary information has been
delivered to the complainant. Complainant acknowledges the receipt of information and
is satisfied .
4.
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
Sd/( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNJAB
SCO No. 84-85, Sector 17-C, CHANDIGARH.
(www.infocommpunjab.com)
Shri Surinder Singh ,
s/o Shri Mehar Singh,
r/o 59-A, Rani ka Bagh,
Amritsar. .
Complainant
Vs.
The Public Information Officer,
O/O Municipal Corporation,
Amritsar.
Respondent.
CC No. 3255 of 2011
Present:
Shri Surinder Singh , Complainant, in person.
Shri S.K.Sharma, Advocate alongwith Shri Shakti Sagar, M.T.P. o/o
Municipal Corporation, Amritsar, on behalf of the Respondent.
ORDER
1.
Heard both the parties through Video Conferencing.
2.
The complainant Shri Surinder Singh made an application dated
30.8.2011 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 to the P.I.O. o/o
Municipal Corporation, Amritsar for seeking information relating to status report
of his application dated 29.6.2011 received in their office vide Diary no. 202. On
getting no response within stipulated period, he made a complaint to the
Commission dated 3.11.2011, which received in its office on 9.11.2011. Notice
for hearing through Video Conferencing were issued to both the parties.
3.
To day, Shri S.K.Sharma, Advocate alongwith Shri Shakti Sagar,
M.T.P. o/o Municipal Corporation, Amritsar, appearing on behalf of the
Contd…..p/2
CC No. 3255 of 2011
-2-
respondent stated through Video Conferencing that necessary information has
been delivered to the complainant. Complainant acknowledges the receipt of
information.
4.
Since the information stands provided, the case is disposed of.
5.
Copy of the order be sent to both the parties.
Sd/Place: Chandigarh
Dated: 14.12. 2011
( B.C.Thakur)
State Information Commissioner