The Teaching Development Programme (TDP)
Programme 2013
Academic Coordinator : Dr. Lorraine Hassan (Academic Staff Development, Fundani CHED), Tel: 021-460
3536 (Hassanl@cput.ac.za).
Blog http://tdpatcput.blogspot.com
What is the TDP?
The TDP is intended for new lecturers. It is a CPUT course intended to assist new lecturers to develop their
practice in higher education teaching, learning and assessment. The TDP is offered in two modules that are
roughly equivalent to one term of study each. The TDP includes a practical component in which the
candidate works with a mentor.
Who is the TDP for?
All new lecturers are invited to enrol for the TDP during their first year of tenure or contract. Preference will
be given to full-time academic staff who are contractually required to do the TDP. Only then will applications
from other academic staff be considered.
TDP aims
The TDP has the following course aims:



Enhancement of candidates’ teaching, learning and assessment practices.
Provision of support for innovative teaching, learning, curriculum and assessment .
Learning through reflection on teaching practice.
Assessment
Candidates who enrol for the TDP are expected to build a basic teaching and learning portfolio and a basic
assessment portfolio (see programme below). Candidates would generally work on these portfolios during
the TDP semester programme, receive feedback on them, and complete them before the end of the year.
Upon successful completion of their portfolios, candidates will receive a CPUT certificate.
Venues and Times
TDP and HDHET workshops/meetings are on Wednesday afternoons from 14h00 – 16h00 (first term on
CT campus, and second term on Bellville campus). The Wednesday afternoons comprise lectures,
seminars, workshops, and e-learning activities. Mentoring visits and individual consultations are offered in
addition to the Wednesday sessions. The Cape Town campus venue is Rm 4.28, Engineering Building and
the Bellville campus venue is the Fundani Preview Room (top floor, Library building).
1
Programme for TDP
Module 1: Teaching and Learning
Venue: Room 4.28, Engineering Building, Cape Town campus
Date
Time
Venue
Topic
06/02
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Welcome and general orientation
16h00
13/02
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Planning and preparation for teaching and
16h00
learning
20/02
14h00 –
e-learning Technology-enhanced teaching and learning
16h00
centre lab
27/02
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Interactive lectures; case-based learning
16h00
06/03
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Problem-based learning
16h00
13/03
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Academic literacy
16h00
20/03
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Community engagement
16h00
27/03
14h00 –
Rm 4.28
Discussion of portfolio and evaluation of
16h00
module
Facilitators
LH
LH
DG
LH
LH
MK
HD
LH, JG
Assessment task: Develop a set of teaching and learning materials within a specific subject area, elective
or specialised programme; the materials should contain the following: 2 consecutive lesson plans (aligned
with outcomes, and that promote deep level learning), 2 examples of media for large group teaching on a
significant topic, 1 small group learning task to promote ‘deep level’ learning, 1 task to accommodate for
diversity, 1 task to support students’ language development within subject, 1 case study, 1 task to show
application of research-based learning, 1 task to show application of technology enhanced teaching and
learning and a reflection on your practice.
Deadline for formative feedback is:10/04/ 2013
Module 2: Assessor training
Venue: Preview Room, Library Building, Bellville Campus.
Date
Group
Venue Topic
17/04
14h00 –
Introduction to and general overview of module;
16h00
assessment criteria for portfolios.
24/04
14h00 –
Problem-based learning assessment methods
16h00
08/05
14h00 –
Formative and continuous assessment
16h00
15/05
14h00 –
Summative assessment
16h00
22/05
14h00 –
IT
Online assessment: Innovative and integrative
16h00
centre methods
Belville
29/05
14h00 –
Use of language in assessment
16h00
05/06
14h00 –
Brief overview of HEQF curriculum requirements;
16h00
Descriptors of level performance
12/06
14h00 –
Discussion of portfolio; evaluation of module
Facilitators
LH
LH
CW, LH
JG, LH
DG
MR
MB
JG
LH, NN-F
2
16h00
Assessment task (TDP): Develop a set of assessment tasks (formative, summative, integrative, etc) within a
specific subject area, elective or specialised programme (assessment criteria to be developed).
Deadline for formative feedback is: 24/07/2013
DEADLINE FOR HANDING IN PORTFOLIO FOR SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: 02/10/2013
Resources:
There are electronic, paper-based, and a range of higher education teaching and learning websites which
are available to all TDP candidates.
Study guides
There are a number of paper based resources (in the form of study guides and handouts). The study guides
are available in electronic form from http://active.cput.ac.za/fundani/
Reading and web-based resources
Where websites are not supplied, candidates are invited to send an e-mail to the relevant convener, who will
e-mail the reading to you (or post you the hard copy).
General
Åkerlind G S 1999. Growing and developing as an academic: what does it mean? HERDSA Annual
International Conference, Melbourne, 12-15 July 1999
Boyer E 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton NJ: Carnegie Foundation
for the Advancement of Teaching.
Cooper T 1996. Portfolio assessment in higher education. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for
Educational Research Forum 1996.
http://education.curtin.edu.au/waier/forums/1996/cooper.html
Engel B 1994. Portfolio assessment and the new paradigm: New instruments and new places. The
Educational Forum, 59 (Fall): 22-27.
Schönwetter D J, Sokal L, Friesen M & Taylor K L 2002. Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual
model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements, The International
Journal for Academic Development, 7 (1): 84 – 97.
Webb G 1996. Understanding Staff Development. SRHE and Open University Press: Buckingham.
Teaching
Biggs J B (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university. OUP:Buckingham .
Higher Education Quality Committee (2004). Improving Teaching & Learning Resource No. 6: 6a) Staff
Development & 6b) The Self-evaluation of Teaching. Available at:
http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000087/ITL_Resource_no6.doc
Jacobs C, Winberg C, Wright C & Wyrley-Birch B 2002. The ABC of Language and Content Integration: A
manual for tertiary educators. Bellville: Peninsula Technikon.
Ramsden P 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routeledge.
Smith K, Shepard S, Johnson D, & Johnson R 2005. Pedagogies of engagement. Journal of Engineering
Education January 2005. 87-101.
Trowler P R & Cooper A 2002. Teaching and Learning Regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in
the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programs. Higher
Education Research and Development, 21 (3): 221-240.
3
Learning
Brown S & Smith B 1996. Introducing Resources for Learning. In Brown S & Smith B, (Eds) ResourceBased Learning. Kogan Page Ltd: London. pp. 1 - 9.
Breslow L, Garraway J, Winberg C, Wright J & Wyrley Birch B 2005. Learning gains in integrated tasks.
Journal of Engineering, Design, and Technology. 3 (3).
Breier, M. & Mabizela, M. (2008) Higher education. In Human resources development review 2008:
education, employment and skills in South Africa. Kraak, A. & Press, K. (eds). Cape Town: HSRC
Press. 278-299.
Ballard, B & Clanchy, J 1997, Teaching international students: a brief guide for lecturers and supervisors,
IDP Education Australia, Deakin, ACT.
Dunn, L/Oxford Brookes University 2000. Theories of Learning. Available at:
http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2_learntch/theories.html
McMaster University 2005. Inquiry-based learning. Available at:
http://www.mcmaster.ca/cll/inquiry/index.htm
Assessment
Brown, G. 2001. Assessment: A guide for lectures. Assessment Series 3. Higher Education Academy.
Brown, S., Race, P. and rust, C. 1995. Using and Experiencing Assessment. In Assessment for Learning in
Higher Education, pp. 75-86. London: Kogan Page.
Brown S 1999. Institutional Strategies for Assessment. In Brown S & Glasner A (Eds) Assessment Matters
in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University
Press. 3 – 13 .
CHE/HEQC (2004) ITL Resource No 5 The Assessment of Student Learning. Available at:
http://www.che.ac.za/d000087/ITL_Resource_No5.pdf
Gibbs G 1999. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In Brown S & Glasner A
(eds) Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham:
SRHE & Open University Press. 41 – 53.
Inman, P. and Vernon, S. 1997. Assessing workplace learning: new trends and possibilities. New Directions
for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 75, pp. 75-85.
Knight, P. 2002. Summative Assessment in Higher Education: practices in disarray. Studies in Higher
Education, Volume 27, No. 3, pp. 275-286.
Luckett K & Sutherland L 2000. Assessment Practices the Improve Teaching and Learning. In Makoni S
(ed) Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Handbook for Southern Africa. 98 – 130.
Price, M. 2005. Assessment standards: the role of communities of practice and the scholarship of
assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 3, June 2005, pp. 215-230.
Race P 2001. A briefing on peer and self assessment. Assessment Series 9. Higher Education Academy.
SAQA 2001. Criteria and Guidelines for Assessment of NQF Registered Unit Standards and Qualifications.
SAQA. Pretoria.
Woolf H 2004. Assessment criteria: reflections on current practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher
Education, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 480-493.
Moderation
Falchikov N 1996. Improving learning through critical peer feedback and reflection. Different Approaches:
Theory and Practice in Higher Education. Proceedings HERDSA Conference 1996. Perth, Western
Australia, 8-12 July. http://www.herdsa.org.au/confs/1996/falchikov.html
Holschier J 2005. Identifying and developing resources to support validation and moderation of assessment
- Small Grant Report [Online, Text], Teaching & Learning Portfolio, Melbourne, Vic, Available at:
http://www.rmit.edu.au//browse;ID=sjbc7xwxgszl1.doc
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005. Procedure on Moderation and Validation of Assessment.
Available at: http://www.mit.edu
Rudner L M 1994. Questions to ask when evaluating tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
4(2). Available at: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=4&n=2
SAQA 2003. Chapter 7: Moderation. In ‘Criteria and Guidelines for the Assessment of NQF registered Unit
Standards and Qualifications’. Available at: http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/critguide/assessment/ch07.pdf
Swinburne University of Technology 2004. Guidelines for moderation. Available at:
http://www.tafe.swin.edu/au/sps/
Evaluation
HEQC 2004. The self-evaluation of teaching. Available at:
http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000087/ITL_Resource_no6.pdf
University of Sydney (n/d). What is Evaluation? Available at:
http://www2.fhs.usyd.edu.au/arow/o/m06/whatis.htm
Developing web-based learning
Gros, B. 2002. Knowledge construction and technology, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,
11(4): 323-343.
Deubel, P. 2003. An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia
design, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-91.
Educational Management
Baume D 2004. Managing Classroom Difficulties. Available at:
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record&section=generic&id=472
Research
Babbie E. & Mouton J 2001. The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Bradbeer J 1999. Evaluation of Curriculum Development in Higher Education. Technical Report # 8,
University of Portsmouth.
Carr W and Kemmis S 1986. Becoming critical: education knowledge and action research. London: Falmer
Press.
Cohen L. & Manion, L 1989. Research methods in education, 3rd edition. London: Croom Helm.
Kemmis S and McTaggart R (eds) 1988. The action research planner, third edition. Victoria: Deakin
University.
Lincoln Y and Guba E 1985. Naturalistic Enquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Srauss A & Corbin J 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for developing
grounded theory. New York: Sage.
Stierer B & Antioniou M 2004. Are there distinctive methodologies for pedagogic research is higher
education? Teaching in Higher Education, 9 (3): 275 – 285.
Vithal R & Janson J 1997/2005. Designing your first research proposal: A manual for researchers in
education and the social sciences. Cape Town: Juta & Co.
Curriculum review and development
Barnett, R. & Coate, K. 2004. Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and
Open University Press.
Biggs, J. 1999. What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research &
Development, 18(1): 57-75.
5
Biggs, J. 2002. Aligning the curriculum to promote good learning. LTSN Generic Centre.
The Higher Education Academy.
http://www.palatine.ac.uk/files/1023.pdf
Accessed: 23 May 2009
Council on Higher Education (CHE): Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC) 2004. Improving
Teaching and Learning (ITL) Resource no. 1: Programme planning, design and management.
http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000087/
South Africa. Department of Education. 2007. The Higher Education Qualifications Framework.
Government Gazette no. 30353 of 5 October 2007. Pretoria: Department of Education.
South African Qualifications Authority. 2000. The National Qualifications Framework and Curriculum
development. Pretoria: SAQA.
http://www.saqa.org.za/structure/nqf/docs/curriculum_dev.pdf
Problem-based learning
Barrows, H.S. & Tamblyn, L.M. 1980. Problem-based learning-an approach to medical education, Volume
1. New York: Springer.
Barrows, H.S. 1985. How to design a problem-based curriculum for the pre-clinical years. New York:
Springer.
Bligh, J. 1995. Problem-based learning in medicine: An introduction. Postgraduate Medical Journal,
71:323-326.
Boshuizen, H.P.A., Van de Vleuten, C.P.M., Schmidt, H.G. & Machiels-Bongaerts, M. 1997. Measuring
knowledge and clinical reasoning skills in a problem-based curriculum. Medical Education, 31:115-121.
Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P., Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. & Van de Vleuten, C.P.M. 2001. Relationship
of tutor's group-dynamic skills to their performance ratings in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine,
76 (5):473-476.
Hattingh, A. & Killen, R. 2003. The promise of problem-based learning for training pre-service technology
teachers. South African Journal of Higher Education,17(1):39-46.
Hay, P.J. & Katsikitis, M. 2001. The "expert" in problem-based and case-based learning: Necessary or not.
Medical Education, 35:22-26.
Mennin, S.P. & Martinez-Burrola, N. 1986. The cost of problem-based versus traditional medical education.
Medical Education, 20:187-194.
Schmidt, H.G., Dauphinee, W.D. & Patel, W.L. 1987. Comparing the effects of problem-based and
conventional curricula in an international sample. Journal of Medical Education, 62:305-315.
Schmidt, H.G., Cohen-Schotanus J.& Arends L.R. 2009. Impact of problem-based, active learning on
graduation rates for 10 generations of Dutch medical students. Medical Education, 43: 211–218.
Papinczak, T, Tunny, T. & Young, L. 2009. Conducting the symphony: a qualitative study of facilitation in
problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Education, 43:377-383.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. & Barrows, H.S. 2006. Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. The
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based learning, 1(1): 21-39.
Van Berkel, H.J.M. & Dolmans, D.H.J.M. 2006. The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group
functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning. Medical Education, 40:730-736.
Technology enhanced teaching and learning
Arthur W. Chickering and Stephen C. Ehrmann (1999). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as
lever. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, October.
http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html
6
Blackboard Training Resources: Introduction to eLearning Pedagogy, Version 1.3.
http://www.campus.manchester.ac.uk/.../elearning/bb_staffdev_intropedagogy_v1_3final.pdf
Blackboard pedagogical Tip. http:blackboardsupport.calpoly.edu/content/faculty/main_pedagog.html
Yang Y. and Cornelious, L. ( 2005) Preparing Instructors for quality Online Instruction.
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/yang81.htm
Language support
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.). 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A
revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York : Longman.
Atkinson, P. 1985. Language, Structure and Reproduction: An introduction to the sociology of Basil
Bernstein. London, Methuen.
Brumfit, C.J. and K. Johnson (eds). 1979. The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. London:
OUP
Canale, M. and Swain, M. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language
teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1-47.
Cummins, J. 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Fairclough, N. 1998. Critical Language Awareness. London: Lancaster
University
Freire, P. 1971. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum
Gee, J. P. 1992. The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H.A. 1981. Teachers as Intellectuals: Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. New York: Bergin
and Garvey
Hymes, D.H. 1971. On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kramsch, C. 1993, Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford
Larson-Freeman, D. 1986. Techniques and Principles in language Teaching. London: OUP
Scrivener, J. 1994. Learning Teaching. Heineman
Versveld, R. 1991. Language and Education. Language Projects Review. Vol 6 No 3/4 pp8-10.
Widdowson, H. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford University Press
7