Kennedy tape; 3/2/2007
Good evening friends, and I have many friends around the world. This is Dr. Sam Kennedy speaking to you by the good graces of TruthRadio.com and our Lord and Savior. Welcome to 'Take
No Prisoners' and thank you for joining me. If you've had the bad judgment to spend an hour with me tonight the least I can do is try and correct that error and really provide you with usable information. Tonight we are continuing our announcement from this past Monday. Our friends, you do not want to miss the enforcement and Administrative procedures we will be revealing regarding the breakthrough technology in which living men and women around the globe who know who they are can enforce their jurisdiction using 'Tenants In Common' payment technology.
I know from the many email that you were kind enough to send me that the issue of enforcement is paramount in your thoughts around the world. Tonight's program is dedicated to all those patriots who is facing dire or eminent judicial circumstances.
My email address for feedback during the break and after the program is
'takenoprisnors@hush.com. Join me free in spirit with an open mind poised for understanding rather than memorization as we dissect this state of the art freedom curriculum right here at
TruthRadio.com. the voice of freedom.
Today is February 26 th
in the year of our Lord 2007. Last Monday as I mentioned we reviewed a new, what I'm calling 'Tenants' in Common' or TIC bonding process, a letter of fiduciary instructions, a follow up compliance letter which I conceived about 4 years ago; we did a little bit on accrual accounting and a application of the technology in a habeas corpus action.
With all of that we've barely scratched the surface. And I intend to make up for that tonight. Excuse me for talking fast but we are going to be cover some territory tonight.
Before we begin however, let me eat some crow. I goofed on Monday I made a big mistake. The typical amount of the indemnity bond is 300 million, not the 30 million and my apologies for any inconvenience. I'm thrilled that you have decided to join me for the second night as we share the fascinating developments which are unfolding literally as we speak. I've been working very very hard on this my friends. We are witnessing the emergence of what I believe is a one two knockout punch with the promise to intercept offers at the outset and cause the judiciary to close the case when it involves a living man.
This is made possible by the convergence of four separate highly formidable technologies into a single versatile highly versatile marquee strategy I'm hoping will become the flagship of our arsenal. It strikes me that grace is unfolding as we watch and I hope I'm not speaking out of line when I say that. What I am referring to is firstly the concept that I formulated years earlier to have treasury track missing funds in appending judicial cases based upon 78 U.S.C 2041(?). Do they know the funds are missing like an email I read not a half an hour ago xxxgarbledxxx
undoubtedly they do but how many people approach them and motivate them to actually track the funds and seize the funds.
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 1 of 10

We covered that letter to the treasury last Monday and if you haven't already listened you may want to download it from the truth radio archives (2/26/07).
Number two, to that philosophy and that information we added our context of administrative process which we reviewed at the Rockland seminar last November. At the risk tho of shameless moments of commercialism might I suggest that the advanced body of commercial procedures we explore at Rockland and we covered many things, and many of them are covered even better on the actual course material; notary deposition, the rogue judge; the motion to compel performance, show cause hearings, xxxgarbledxxx
, constitutional commercial habeas, suspicious activities and misprision procedures, and, self executing confession of judgment.
You would want to review those. Certainly anyone who would ever consider fishing in this pond will want to be familiar with those procedures because this is all about enforcement. You can order the Rockland seminar, excuse me for mentioning, for a rather modest $200.00 donation. By forwarding a totally blank money which can be sent to my assistant Brian Williams c/o TGFM at
169 Delaware Avenue #229, Delmar New York, 12054 and I hope I don't sound like Erwin Schiff folks. Hey everyone, for the record; pay your taxes, right? Do what you are suppose to do, make no sudden decisions and no changes in lifestyle. Take some time to study the material From Rockland, study Winston Shrouts' materials. Learn who who you are. And then you are ready to move on to enforcement strategies as a learning experience if you decide you are ready for and you have all that under your belt.
Now, to those previous two things that I just mentioned we've added the so called 'public notice technology' which one of the Rockland attendees sprang on us unexpectedly. But as many surprises will be just like when they discovered Lucite, it turned out to be a blessing in disguise. Virtually any declaration of your political status can be woven in even something as simple as a private ID which you have had apostilled can be woven into the process that we will be revealing tonight. It xxxgarbledxxx
is perfect. And finally we've wrapped all of that, public notice document, the missing funds from treasury, and the administrative process we'd reviewed at Rockland, we've wrapped all of that up with the new TIC bonding strategy which give legs to the process. And in fact the process is likely to fail if you DON'T have legs in the process.
Now before I get swamped with emails saying, send me everything you got and pictures of your kids there are plenty of samples of indemnity bonds and offset bonds and promissory notes and fiduciary appointment documents out there still making their rounds on the web and Winston has very kindly made them available as well. I can tell you right now what I'm involved intensively in in rewriting the administrative process from the ground up. Changing our focus from acceptance for value and surety bonds and the like and remanaging it into what I call a foreign advisory, the likes of which might be used by the international monetary fund if they received the subpoena from the
United States which is inapplicable to them.
The new administrative process will now focus on the following particulars:
1 The public record of United States acceptance of our declaration of political status and that could be the great seal of the president or it could be an apostille and maybe some other verity of things. An apostille is a very easy thing to secure at this time until they wake the secretaries of state up.
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 2 of 10

Here is an outtake from the current R & D. from the current Administrative Process we are working on Quote :
Pursuant to its former legalization process (by the way that might read 'pursuant to the United States obligation under convention xxxgarbledxxx of a xxxgarbledxxx the 5 th
of October 1961, that would depend on whether you have the great seal of the apostille ) pursuant to it former legalization process the United States has officially recognized my foreign credentials Exhibit A. U.S. agents such as yourself, are required to expend full faith and credit U.S recognition that I am not a United
States citizen subject or xxxgarbledxxx a person or subject to your jurisdiction, arrest, detention or distress in the absence of a written election xxxgarbledxxx and admit is the supreme law of your land and fully binding on you. Not withstanding your normal business practices or any anxiety you might feel regarding the rights of the living man without the united states.
To avoid unnecessary liability all necessary steps should be taken to prevent an attack on my freedom, property, mobility, and interest and to return all of my property UnQuote.
Something like that will appear early on in our administrative remedy which we are discussing right now.
The other major point of focus of the administrative process is the risks and liability to the fiduciary for failing to honor and transfer to treasury the tender of the TIC payment. Now keep in mind that before I read this that that last paragraph and the following paragraph are being received by a clerk and by a judge in a court and you are telling them 'here is my proof of who I am, not my word, here is your proof; and you are backing that up with an Affidavit of Negative Averment saying 'I see no defect in your acceptance of this proof and your being bound by it.
Now here is the teeth. Quote; you will be named co-payee with the secretary of the treasury on an demand for deposit instrument annexed here to as a courtesy, don’t know why do you call it a courtesy: because we pay the account with our acceptance; the bonds and the promissory note are just colorable fluff for public consumption and it is a courtesy that we are including it. We are telling them you'll be named co-payee with the secretary of the treasury on a demand deposit instrument annexed here to as a courtesy in the amount of $5,000,000 by prearrangement with the department of the treasury. The instrument must be processed and deposited with treasury within 5 days to avoid personal liability. You may wish to review this advisory with council.
Folks, who talks to judges like that? I do. And they listen. I'm not recommending this to anyone I'm just telling you what I do in my arsenal. We'll talk a lot more about liability after the bread which is coming up in less than a minute. The administrative process is introducing a new concept although those attorneys are well versed in it in what I call a null appearance. Not a 'special appearance' but it is basically denying them the right to imply 'any sort of appearance, special or otherwise merely because I've decided to send them a private letter from a foreign jurisdiction; and here is one opening under development Quote The above noted offer to expand funds under public policy and all such offers as listed on Schedule O, are being returned for cause annexed to this advisory noted
'Accepted for Value.'
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 3 of 10

This letter Rogatory from a foreign jurisdiction does not constitute an appearance. And that is the first thing the judge reads. When we return after the break we'll explore enforcement technologies in keeping with what I just read.
Welcome back my friends to 'take no prisoners with Dr. Sam Kennedy. You are listening to
TruthRadio.com, the voice of freedom. Folks, I'd like you to keep in mind that all of this information is for entertainment purposes only. This information is what I might do in a situation and I offer it out there for those who have a keen pleasure of learning and exploring new things. If you enjoy the material would you be so kind as to share with me your thoughts on how we might create the most appropriate educational experience to disseminate this sort of information in the future and to take those of you who have a real potential to become leaders and gather you together in small groups and grow this information, grow your skills and grow your self confidence. I did throw out some ideas last Monday of 'A Freedom Residency', or a 'Cyclic Retreat' or a Cyclic
Quarterly Symposium and if you have any thoughts on that or any other ideas please send your responses your ideas to 'takenoprisnors@ hush.com' and definitely do not attach any documents or they will be blocked.
We have been exploring how in and administrative remedy we might advise the recipient; the clerk, the judge, the fiduciary that they are receiving payment that is co pay with the Secretary of the
Treasury and how we would be presenting the United States acceptance of our political status declaration and also how we would be returning profits to them accepted for value and advising them that there is no appearance to be assumed from this letter. (Rogatory) But this process also focuses on jurisdictional limitations however we are not gonna be going in 'publicly' and arguing that unless we absolutely have too upon their firm dishonor of this process. Take note of what I'm about to say; everything we do must be done privately. I know some of you have lost confidence in the private letter Rogatory, I haven’t. I've used them for years and believe me they claim they don't have them and we see the stack on the desk and we watch the lawyers gather round them; I've even sent friends of mine up dressed in suits and ties to put their arms around those lawyers and share a conversation with them. And you know what they say? They point to the judge and say 'my goodness, he doesn't need this at this point in his career – he is close to retiring. They are scared.
They don't understand the process; they do understand that we access to a system of law that they don't understand and they pay attention to what we tell them when we educate them in this manner.
Keep it private unless you absolutely have to move public. Here is how we'd address jurisdiction privately; here is a paragraph I'm in the process of constructing: 'jurisdiction; the entity named in your action. Legal fiction SAM KENNEDY, of the United States creation pursuant to intentional misnomer lacks the necessary xxxgarbledxxx to contract and the mobility to make appearances unless
YOU on behalf of the United States acting as trustee and liable party for all of its actions elects to produce it or elects to exhibit it. I have indicated by affidavit annexed hereto that I have been unable to locate my authority and ability to exhibit the fiction and I therefore deny xxxgarbledxxx
things the law not requiring impossibilities or penalties thereto. For your own protection you must not assume that any previous communications, instruments, actions, rescinded signatures or errors by the undersigned comprise a continuing grant of jurisdiction.
I'm not arguing jurisdiction; I'm letting him know that his liability is tied up in his willingness to accept jurisdiction that he doesn't have and I can back it up. You'll know by the end of this letter that I can back it up. In other words we are laying down the gauntlet by thrusting a living man in
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 4 of 10

their face and is not only outside their scope of powers but who provides a letter Rogatory an affidavit of Negative Averment the likes of which they've probably never seen.
And here is what I might ell the about that affidavit of Negative Averment and I might tell them early in the letter Rogatory. I'm not going to argue that the affidavit is there I'm going to place proof of claim on their shoulders and make an opportunity for them, and here is what it says: as a courtesy to ensure your opportunity to rebut errors and memorialize the integrity of the public record I have verified the jurisdictional and payment representation herein. This is a splendid opportunity for you to rebut the presumption that trespasses on my claim or status, comprise your confession to enticement to slavery by cohorsing a foreigner to falsely present himself as a United
States citizen directly or by deception, misnomer or intentional mistake in identity. As a further courtesy you may also rebut the presumption that such enticement by threat, force, arrest, indictment, imprisonment or other rather on legis coursive device against an exempt living man, his property or those who fall under his covature comprises your confession to high crimes against mankind such as assault within the maritime jurisdiction with your willful acceptance of full commercial liability pursuant to the very system international remedies at my disposal. (endquote)
Folks, this process doesn't just return the documents accepted for value but it wraps that return in a facade of public pretense where they interpret it as a return or they interpret as a return of defective process by a foreign entity much as the International Monetary Fund returns process when it receives a subpoena from a U. S. Court. I know because I've seen those letters from their attorneys.
So in other words I'm not quoting statutes. I did mention enticement to slavery, in uppercase beginning letters so they know it's from their statutes. And I did mention a fault within the maritime jurisdiction but I'm mentioning those items to them not to threaten them with it frighten them with it but because I understand their public mindset. That is what 'they' worry about. So lets bring that into the process; not charge them lets give them a verified affidavit of fact as a splendid opportunity for them to rebut the presumption that they ARE committing those crimes. How much more gracious can we be than that? Here's something else I might say: The above noted offer to expand funds under public policy and all such offers listed on the attached schedule are being returned for cause annexed to this advisory noted accepted for value. This letter Rogatory from a foreign jurisdiction does not constitute an appearance. I'm repeating that because it is worth you understanding you are sending them back defective process you are not making an appearance.
None of this would have been feasible without the emerging of the TIC process (Tenants in
Common ) building upon the treasury liquidation procedures that I played around with years earlier in which I read you last Monday. It is as if a great cloud has been lifted at lest in my mind, Folks, treasury may be the central bank but the country is scattered with local branches for our convenience in the form of courts, property tax collectors, banks, insurance companies, corporations, employers; virtually every agent of U.S. inc., which as you know under Lincolns occupation and Roosevelt Bolshevik Revolution is every institution across this great land. While we've been sending stuff all over the world Puerto Rico and Washington and the rings of Saturn for all I know; we could have been marking that stuff into the local branch direct access to the Federal
Window. And the ticket for doing that is the TIC bonding process which ties that fiduciary at that local branch of the bank that local branch of treasury which they call an insurance company, a corporation, a property tax collector, a clerk of a court they are tied into that system by being made a joint tenant, a tenant in common on that provisory note relating back to the offset bond. This is a formidable undertaking my friends and for all of you who have already started down the TIC
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 5 of 10

pathway weeks ago it is not something to be tried after reading a sample letter or listening to my puny voice for an hour, or even listening to Winston which follows this program, excuse me,
Barton which follows this program and Winston on Monday. It requires a genuine understanding of who you are. We need to train leaders rather than future victims.
I've got plenty victims who send me emails everyday with note of dire consequences their decisions to do surgery with a medics education. We don't need more of those victims. This is a comprehensive technology to be considered only and exclusively by those who truly know the end game based upon their studies and commitment to learning. That's why I need your emails about learning.
Folks, I caution you do not dabble in this. Pay your taxes, take care of your commitments. Do nothing. Change nothing, Until and unless you absolutely understand who you are. Don't do it when you are in your second year of medical school. Do not move to Minnesota from Miami and roll your shack on the ice in the first 24 hours. Do nothing, spend some time learning. And with that said, please; when we return we'll pick this up and go directly to enforcement strategy and you do not want to miss that. I think you'll be shocked.
My friends, your are listening to Take No Prisoners and Truth Radio . com.
(break)
Welcome back, to Take No Prisoners. I'm Dr. Sam Kennedy and I thank you from the bottom of my heart for joining me. Here's and email I received during the break. Short and sweet; Sam, I want to learn. Tell us how. Well, I wish I could tell you how. I am proposing some basic ideas. Based upon my educational experience where we begin with a lecture in the morning in fact a late starting time for people can commute and cut their costs intensive lecture in the morning followed by case presentation and that is where we'll do our real learning. Then break around 3 or 4 and have informal discussion over dinner for a couple hours then break to our hotel rooms where we have actual homework assignment and construct the documents and the instruments you need to do it come in and present them for the first hour the following morning. Maybe a symposium format on a cyclic basis maybe using some periodic conference calls although these are usually limiting on the amount of callers; to reinforce your information to ask questions on a regular basis. Please send me your feedback.
Now, lets get on to enforcement. Let me show you how easy it is to conceive the technology, to use original thinking once you’ve committed to the necessary education. Only last night I received an email regarding a deportation situation and I must of mulled it over when I slept because it was fresh in my mind when I woke up and I immediately called some folks and in fact just got off the phone prior to this program with a party regarding that situation. I think we can overturn the potential deportation fairly easily. Here is how I'd take the administrative remedy, part of which I just read, and change it on the fly. The above noted offer to expand funds under public policy and all such offers are being returned for cause annexed to this advisory noted accepted for value. This letter Rogatory is an official request for you to identify the registered geographical borders of the
United States for the purpose of verifying that the undersigned real party of interest under injury is physically present therein to facilitate deportation there from. Legal fiction SAM KENNEDY has attached a FOIA request hereto as a colorable public facade.
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 6 of 10

Notice how I worded that. I'm not giving them the FOIA as a living man I want no part of the public. But the fiction can get involved and I'm not telling the fiction what to do, I'm telling them the fiction told me.
Next paragraph, In addition as a demonstration of good faith pursuant to my status as a neutral nonbelligerent without the United States and to insure the integrity of the public record, Your have been named co payee with the Secretary of Treasurer blab la bla.
The point; here's who I am, I have an affidavit of negative averment that will say something like;
Declarant has seen no evidence that the United States has registered borders such that Declarant can identify whether Declarant is within the United States and no such evidence exists. There is no evidence that Declarant can be deported from the United States the Declarant is without the United
States is not within the United States. There is a million ways you can do it. But it is the Bond that where you would bond up on the indemnity Bond you'd name as account holders. All of the court officers, the immigration department, the director of immigration, you name them all and the accounts they are involved; what ever account numbers they give you cause obviously they give you a number, we are after all profit in their eyes, and then three days later make payments of the offset bond, send the offset bond off to the treasury in an answer to an email I got earlier this evening; looking at the joint tenancy offset bond and then send the promissory note with the letter
Rogatory, the negative averment, the FOIA request, a copy of your political declaration and the
United States acceptance of it; send all that in and tell them you are coming after them if they don't execute on that within 72 hours. I wouldn't say that to someone unless I meant it. And I would come after them in 3 days and here is how:
Xxxgarbledxxx an enforcement
Xxxgarbledxxx approached me a couple days ago I got a call from a friend who wants to demand a hearing with a state agency and wants to put them on record as declining the request and build up those records or work them over the coals in the presence of a court recorder. If it was me I might attend a hearing like that under my rules; bring a notary and bring a promissory note sandwiched into my checkbook made out to the hearing officer and the Secretary of Treasury and the secretary or commissioner of that state agency; that you appoint them all as cotrustees. I might tell him that he's convinced me and I want to pay the freight, and here it is and hand it to him, and either they are going to accept the payment or dishonor it. Now it shows you that this technology can work on the fly. This technology can work at hearings, it can work with preparation, it can work without preparation; you just have to use it and follow it thru; I'm not recommending you use it, but if you want it to work it has to be used, it sure is not gonna work if you don't use it. And it sure should not be used if you don't know exactly who you are. That’s why I offer it exclusively for
Xxxgarbledxxx
purposes only.
If it was me I might hand them the note and if he declines it I might say something like sir I might point out that you are co trustee with the secretary of the Treasury. If he's a boss I might ask if he is authorized to decline funds which are being paid to the benefit of the United States Treasury. We are not writing 'from' treasury like people use to do with BOEs, we want to make a deposit 'into' treasury and give them a windfall profit to use until the terms of the instrument expires and the instrument matures.
I might mention that if payment is declined then payment has been made. I might ask the Sir are you sure you don't want to read the instrument first; all of that recorded on the record. In other
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 7 of 10

words I would use every opportunity to save my brother and give him every opportunity to perform and then I might say 'let the record show that John Jones has declined my offer to pay in full account number 123 and that notary public Jane Doe is issuing as we speak a certificate of payment and a certificate of protest on the payment which I am now entering into the official record by handing to the notary to serve under notary seal on Mr. Jones.
Now imagine what one can do with those pieces of paper, they are just words on a paper. They wouldn't mean xxxgarbledxxx
to anyone in Japan or Germany, but it is dynamite under United State public policy I think. Could it be a counterclaim? Could be. I might stick it into a federal jacket for
$39.00 the cost of a dinner. Attached to a simple public policy summary judgment in lieu of complaint or a complaint itself, knowing that the magistrate will rule on my process and we'll talk more about that in a few minutes. Or I might follow it up with Administrative process the likes in which we were discussing in which I first secure their agreement to a self executing Confession of
Judgment. I might do that, in fact I would do that. Am I recommending it to you, of course not. But
I would have self executing Confession of Judgment that says 'an attachment to a notary certificate this party has confessed judgment. And I would mail that to a clerk in some courts and ask for her signature in a nice official looking envelope. I might secure confessions of judgment, knowing me, from 4 or 5 of my close friends whose credit ratings have already crashed. What's one more judgment? And I might send all of them along, a stack of them for the clerk in that nice official envelop
xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx
ask for the sign them and return them to me. She might do it, she might not; but if she does…wallah ! There you are with your judgment signed and executed and you didn't have to go to court. Believe me they sign confessions of judgment all the time, especially under state rules. Hey folks. I didn't invent U.S. Code. I didn't work for the senators the congressmen and the publication house I xxxgarbledxxx
have. I didn't write the local rules. But I sure know how to read. The bottom line is hey, it's been paid, what did YOU do with the secretaries (of
Treasury) funds? And that leads to a whole nother line of enforcement. You are not charging your brother but you think it would be proper to advise the fiduciary in your letter rogitory that you don't have an objection; Here's what I might say; I don't have an objection if legal fiction SAM
KENNEDY is required to fulfill certain reporting requirements regarding suspicious activity and misprision of felony and treason obligations when it has unfortunately observed an apparent theft of funds in the special maritime jurisdiction.
Folks, that sounds reasonable to me because I'm giving warning and opportunity to remedy to my brother. I want to first save my brother.
Here's another example. Lets say I request a hearing and mail in the payment so it arrives the day before. When I arrive I could ask on the record 'what did you do with my payment? Where is my money? And if they turn around and start talking a criminal investigation I'm going to demand the criminal investigator come in and right there, because I want to get to the bottom of this, I want to put all of you under oath before this notary and this court recorder and ask you 'what did you do with my money?' We can't accept that that is not real money, I'm handing it back to you. Oh Really?
Well, here is a notary Certificate of Payment, she just pulled this out sir. And as payment on the public policy here now for and on the record would you like to come to your senses and settle this account.
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 8 of 10

I might ask if they deposited the instrument? Are you sure, are you sure sir you want to dishonor payment. But once I leave there, once I've built up the record that I want I might have the notary make presentment of, get this, just before the break, A 'Notice of Assignment of Liability' or maybe
'A Notice of Conversion of Liability' or something like that which names the official and his business partners as the liable party. You can't imagine how all this works but the fun you might have with that folks then come on back after the break.
Welcome back, to TakeNoPrisoners; Folks where has the time gone? I'm speaking fast as I can without being recruited for a Federal Express commercial. Anyway, back to the fun. What I leave of hearing is the notary certificate of service. I might ask the notary to make presentment of my Notice of Conversion of liability, or something like that, or have the notary do it but the parties would have to be warned that they were being given that they were undertaking a conversion and an acceptance of liability by virtue of their failure to accept payment or failure to tender the credits to the account.
And once they are issued that warning then the Notaries Certificate would not tell them that's what they've done it would note that said party was advised, it was given due notice under notary seal, that their failure to accept payment would comprise the conversion of liability and the Notary xxxgarbledxxx
what they were told but people who read it would look at it and draw the obvious conclusions; and the conclusion is truthful of course. So I’m going to have all sorts of fun with that.
You want to keep sending me xxxgarbledxxx
all right buddy, I might place the payment instrument and notice of liability as a collateral on a UCC1 and assign that collateral to an official using a UCC3 and send it in privately with a letter inquiring as though he’d like me to file it, but if necessary if they’d like the strawman to bring them in for a hearing under penalty of perjury to locate the stolen funds; or would they prefer to send me an adjusted statement of account evidencing the credit. I’m a nice guy. I’ll give them an offer of immunity for at least a couple of days.
Conversion of liability is the primary topic that will provide teeth in the enforcement process. It might say something like on a certain date notary public Jane Doe certified your receipt under notary seal in the amount of 5 million United States dollars and has presented you with her
Certification xxxgarbledxxx
of personal service. You may wish to review this with council. Now as the notary has certified you acceptance of all liability formally attributed to legal fiction SAM
KENNEDY in case number 1 2 3 Please advise me if you’d prefer that I file the attached order for a hearing for you to show cause why you have not offered a chosen action on behalf of the debtor and should not be required to provide a appropriate commercial and xxxgarbledxxx
compensation, that means payment with your body, as the case may require to which I will attach the annexed Notice of Converted liability and UCC3 assignment of liability to you or would prefer to send me an adjusted statement of account reflecting that you’ve made the full credit, you’ve posted the full credit to account 123. Folks, this is just off the top of my head. Do you see the fun that you can have here? I might tell them; if this is a case where they did accept the instrument for instance I might say something like ‘your failure to account for the 5 million dollar demand for account in your possession and the disappearance of funds belonging to Mr. secretary has been certified by the notary as your stipulation to the value and validity of the instrument, accordingly. As a Christian I thought I would provide you with a good faith opportunity to treat the disappearance of funds from public coffers as a error rather than a theft of funds in a special maritime jurisdiction. Please advise me no later than such-and-such if you’d prefer to make a formal request to treasury to seize the funds from your bond and investigate whether you reported the gain. If they hold the funds don’t they have a reportable gain? And do you want me to investigate and apparent suspicious activity of
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 9 of 10

the theft of the secretary’s money or prefer to send me an adjusted statement of account showing evidence of the credit. If you prefer I can also subpoena your records sir xxxgarbledxxx
for you to provide full disclosure of the business activities regarding this account or whatever other pattern of such activities may be ongoing. And by the way you still don’t like to perform the notary will certify that as your confession of judgment that all of the statements I just made. Thanks you very much for you kind cooperation and understanding. And you know folks I’d include an affidavit of
Negative Averment and unsigned copies of the reference document.
Let me ask you, am I the only one who sees the potential here? I hope not. For a patriot this is like finding your first baseball bat under the Christmas tree. Do you see how I called for a special program xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx regarding possible educational xxxgarbledxxx
forums? In my opinion this has unlimited potential.
So, I’ve got a regular court case I might ask for a subpoenas first, which is something I always suggest before the fireworks begin while they still think I’m a slightly demented compliant slave whose dumb enough to adventure in pro sae. Then I might send in my payment and name the judge and clerk as co-trustees and co-fiduciaries. Do you think the other judges will appreciate having their trusty clerk involved in confessing judgment to a maritime theft. It wouldn’t take much work to rework the confession of judgment on the Rockland CD for those of you who have it. This is something applicable to this. And you can bet I’m working on it as we speak.
Who knows what kind of pressure they can bring to bear on that first judge in the backroom and who among his successors will oppose me if I succeed in having the funds seized from his bond, and he is off the bench. And believe me, we can succeed in convincing him we can seize his bond.
Here’s another idea that struck me just this afternoon. Excuse me for rushing here. The tendency once we start the ball rolling privately is to call a bond hearing to rescind his bond. And I’ve got someone who will probably be work with shore to use it. xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx
call my bond. They’ll take me to prison, I’ve been convicted. So we can reduce the odds of such a hearing without ever leaving private process. xxxgarbledxxx
Quote, as trustee you are free to call a bond hearing to rescind the fiction to insure that you must remain cognizant of the distinction of the parties, meaning the distinction between the living man and myself, we will require simultaneously a hearing for the third party defendant to identify the defendant under oath and penalty of perjury. If you fail to schedule a hearing we will immediately expand the windfall modernization to John
Roberts (who happens to be the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court) and require his intervention to avoid seizure of the funds here-to-shown the secretary of the treasury. And I’m not willing to stop there. I might bond the parties, have the notary certify the stipulation as to the value of the payment absence of a defect acceptance of the payment and acceptance of the converted liability as holder in due course and then I might take that settlement and file it into a federal jacket, as I mentioned only this time it might be with a complaint and I migh attach to that complaint a demand for a bill of particulars asking them to dispute the entire record. By the way, rule b(3) of the special rules for maritime states that interrogatories can be served with the complaint. Not that I care what the rules say but they understand what the rules are xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx xxxgarbledxxx.
END
Dr. Sam Kennedy 3/2/2007 Page 10 of 10