A01 The Sleep-Wake Cycle External cues from the environment (exogenous zeitgebers) are important in guiding the circadian sleep-wake cycle. These include changes in daylight (you feel sleepy when it’s dark and are roused by the sunlight in the morning) or knowing what time of day it is and therefore whether it is time to asleep or awake. However, there is also an internal (endogenous) ‘clock’. This internal circadian clock is ‘free running’ (works without external cues) setting a cycle of about 24-25 hours. Under normal circumstances the internal clock does not work alone. Studies show that circadian rhythms persist despite isolation from natural light, which demonstrates the existence of an endogenous ‘clock’. However, external cues are also important; the clock was not perfectly accurate: it varied from day to day. A01: Core Body Temperature Another circadian rhythm is the core body temperature cycle. This is one of the best indicators of the circadian rhythm. It is at its lowest at about 4.30am (about 36°C) and highest around 6pm (38°C). There is a slight trough just after lunch which is not just due to the effects of having lunch- the dip occurs even when people have not eaten suggesting that the rhythm is influenced by the body’s internal clock. PSYA3 SLEEP: Learning Table 1 Circadian Rhythms Circadian Rhythms are those rhythms are those rhythms that last about 24 hours. Two known circadian rhythms are the sleep wake cycle and the body temperature cycle. A02 Endogenous clock (Internal) evidence and commentary Exogenous Zeitgebers (External) evidence and commentary MAID :-/ Mixed support for a free-running rhythm Support for external cues Deterministic Vs Free Will P- There is mixed evidence to support the idea of ‘free-running’ circadian rhythms. P- However, there is research to suggest that external cues are important P: An issue with the explanation offered for circadian E- For example, Siffre (1975) spent six months in a Texan cave with no external cues to guide in circadian rhythms to an extent because the internal ‘clock’ is not rhythms is that it is deterministic. his rhythms – no daylight, no clocks or radio. He slept, woke and ate when he felt like it and perfectly accurate. E: This is because they suggest that sleep-wake patterns found that his natural circadian rhythm settled down to just over 24 hours initially; but E- For example, Folkard et al. (1985) conducted an experiment to see if are fixed and pre-determined by internal mechanisms. changed dramatically to as much as 48 hours. external cues could be used to override the internal clock. 12 pps lived in Miles et al (1977) illustrate the power of these internal E- This provides mixed support because although it suggests that his endogenous pacemakers a cave for 3 weeks isolated time cues. The volunteers agreed to go to bed biological clocks using a case of a young man who was (SCN, pineal gland and the role of melatonin) have internally managed Siffre’s rhythms to 24 when the clock indicated 11.45pm and get up at 7.45am. Initially the clock blind, which meant that light did not reset his circadian hours initially, it does suggest that the role of exogeous zeitgebers have an impact on his ran normally but gradually they quickened the clock until it was indicating rhythm. He was exposed to various external cues, such sleep-wake cycle also (e.g. light, social cues). This is because Siffre’s circadian rhythm changed the passing of 24 hours when only 22 hours had passed. They found that as clocks, yet found these had little effect on his to 48 hours and if it was purely down to the role of ‘free running’ circadian rhythms, his sleepat the beginning, the Pps circadian cycle matched the clock but as it internally set circadian rhythms suggesting that the role wake cycle would be expected to stay at 24 hours. quickened their rhythm ceased to match the 22 hour cycle imposed by of endogenous pacemakers were innate and L- Consequently, this provides credible support for a free-running circadian rhythm to an the experimenters (except for one participant who did adapt to the 22 determined his circadian rhythm. However, this extent. However, most circadian rhythms work with the influences of exogenous zeitgebers hour cycle). determinist interpretation maybe misleading. It is clear additionally, suggesting support for both the roles of endogenous pacemakers (internal E: This suggests that the circadian rhythm can only be guided to a limited that the internal mechanism is very powerful but there is biological ‘clocks’) and exogenous zeitgebers (external time-givers). extent by external cues because you would expect all Pps to adapt their some flexibility in the system. cycles to 22 hours. The fact they didn’t suggests they are a limited E: For example, this explanation does not take into Support for a free-running rhythm influence in this case. account ‘choice’ and the individuals ‘free will’ they have P: Furthermore, there is other empirical evidence to support the idea of a ‘free-running’ L- Nevertheless, this provides some credibility to the idea that external over their circadian rhythms. We can decide to go to bed rhythm. cues are important in circadian rhythms. However, a combination of both 2 hours later than normal and wake up at the same time E: For example, Aschoff & Wever (1976) placed participants in an underground WWII bunker exogenous zeitgebers and endogenous pacemakers are evident in the next day without much difficulty. Folkard et al (1985) in the absence of any environmental and social time cues. They found that most participants circadian rhythms such as the sleep wake cycle. found that one person managed to keep to a 22 hour displayed circadian rhythms between 24 and 25 hours, yet some were 29 hours. rhythm with the use of external cues, showing that other E: This supports the idea that the cycle operates in the absence of external cues and that the Further support for external cues factors can override the internal clock. natural free-running cycle is about 24 -25 hours P: However, further evidence for the support of exogenous zeitgebers is L: Therefore, the explanatory power of endogenous L: Providing credible support for the role of endogenous pacemakers and the idea of an provided after Folkard et al’s experiments finished. pacemakers in the role of circadian rhythms in the internal biological clock and a ‘free-running’ rhythm. E: This is because as soon as they were over, the Pps took only a few days sleep-wake cycle is reduced because there is evidence to resynchronize their cycles to the available external time cues e.g. clocks MI: Lacks Internal Validity to suggest they can’t exist without the influences of and daylight. P: One issue with Aschoff & Wever’s (1976) study is that it is arguably low in internal validity. exogenous zeitgebers. The fact that individuals have E: This suggests that the biological clock was ‘re-set’ in the process known E: This is because they placed all of their participants together in an underground bunker free will over external cues that also influence our as entrainment, in particular, light which can reset the body’s main where they were likely to influence one another. For example, they may have socialized circadian rhythms, make the role of endogenous pacemaker, the SCN. together, eaten together and therefore decide to go to bed and sleep at the same time as one pacemakers an inadequate explanation overall. L: Consequently, this suggests that the influence of external cues are another. ** Other potential MAID: Biological Approach and link prominent in circadian rhythms such as the sleep wake cycle E: This is an issue because it means that external factors may have influenced their circadian to Science debate –empirical evidence that can be rhythms and sleep-wake cycle rather than just their internal biological clocks. falsified, strengthening the debate that Psychology is a L: Therefore the support that Aschoff & Wever’s (1976) study gives to the idea of a ‘freeScience ** running’ endogenous pacemaker is reduced because their study can be flawed. Supporting A02 Evidence and Commentary Support for core body temperature and cognitive abilities P: There is empirical evidence to suggest that the circadian variation in the core body temperature has been linked to cognitive abilities. E- For example, Folkard et al. (1977) looked at the learning ability of 12 and 13 year old children who had stories read to them at either 9am or 3pm. They found that after one week, the 3pm group (higher core body temperature) showed both superior recall and comprehension, retaining about 8% more material than the morning 9am group. E: Additionally, Gupta (1991) found that performance on IQ tests was best at 7pm compared with 9am or 2pm. E- This suggests that long-term recall is best when body temperature is highest. L: Consequently, these findings could be used in real-life applications in schools. This increases the applicability of the research behind the circadian rhythm of core body temperature which in turn strengthens its explanatory power. Contradictory A02 Evidence and Commentary Evidence to dispute the link between core body temperature and cognitive abilities P: However, there is evidence to dispute Folkard (1977) and Gupta (1991) findings that there is a link between core body temperature changes and changes in cognitive performance. E- For example, Hord & Thompson (1983) tested cognitive performance in a field instead of a lab environment and didn’t find any correlation E- Wright et al (2002) suggests this may be because higher core body temperature leads to increased physiological arousal (being anxious in a lab) and this leads to cognitive performance instead. L: Consequently, the validity of Folkard (1977) and Gupta (1991) findings are questioned because arguably they are not purely measuring core body temperature and cognitive abilities. In turn, the credibility of the link between core body temperature and cognitive abilities are reduced because the studies used to support it can be falsified. A02 MAID for Hormones MAID Other methodological Issues can be brought in if needed e.g: * Correlation * Temporal Validity * ‘Operationalisation’ of Cognitive abilities e.g. Gupta used IQ tests but Folkard may have used other methods which may affect Internal Validity of studies which would then reduce the support and credibility of the link between Core Body Temperature and cognitive abilities NB Just make sure you link it back to what it means for core body temperature etc. A01: Hormones Hormone production follows a circadian rhythm. Real life applications Cortisol is at its lowest around midnight and peaks at 6am. It is P: A strength of the research into circadian rhythms is that it has been used for real life applications. a hormone related to making us alert when we wake up and E- For example, chronotherapeutics is the study of how timing affects drug treatments. The circadian rhythm affects digestion, heart rate and hormone secretions which should be taken into account when can explain why if we awaken at 4am it is hard to think clearly taking drugs. (cortisol levels are not sufficiently high for alertness). E- This is because drugs need to be taken at certain times when they will be most effective, for example, taking asprin. As most heart attacks occur early in the mornings, asprin needs to be taken around Melatonin (which induces sleepiness) and growth hormone are 11pm which allows it to peak into the blood stream (in 2 – 4 hours). Therefore the importance of research into circadian rhythms such as hormone production is crucial. two other hormones that have a clear circadian rhythm both L- Consequently, as the applicability of such research is so prominent in real life, the credibility of research into hormone production is strengthened. peaking at around midnight. Potential Exam Questions 1a) Describe research on circadian rhythms (8 marks) (A01 ONLY – write about the sleep wake cycle, core body temperature and hormones. Give in depth and accurate detail to reach the top band) 1b) Evaluate research on circadian rhythms (16 marks) (A02 ONLY – write about EVALUATION points only – mixed support for free running rhythms, cognitive abilities etc. NO A01 WHATSOEVER) MAKE SURE YOU BRING IN MAID). You have 30 minutes for the sleep section in your exam. Use your time wisely. There are more marks available for A02 points. If you have a 24 mark essay (8 + 16), use 10 mins for A01 and 20 mins for A02. If you have shorter questions, adapt your timing as necessary. You MUST include DETAIL in ALL OF YOUR ANSWERS (A01 & A02). Make sure you include a mixture of OUTCOME studies AND MAID PEELS in your A02. Aim for 4-5 FULLY ELABORATED DETAILED PEELS that are LINKED to the QUESTION. Use the WORDS in the Question to structure your answer and USE THEM in your POINTS (P) and LINKS (L).