Mid-Year Review of the Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 (Word)
advertisement
Sven Torfinn/IRIN/Uganda/2006 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: Strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); Resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); Coordinated programme implementation; Joint monitoring and evaluation; Revision, if necessary; and Reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region and includes the following elements: A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; An assessment of needs; Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; Stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; A clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; Prioritised response plans; and A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team (CT). This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes United Nations (UN) agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and Non Government Organizations (NGOs) that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. Non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can be included, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is to be presented to donors in July 2007. Donors provide resources to appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2007: AARREC AASAA ABS Abt Associates ACF/ACH/AAH ACTED ADRA Africare AGROSPHERE AHA ANERA ARCI ARM AVSI CADI CAM CARE CARITAS CCF CCIJD CEMIR Int’l CENAP CESVI CHFI CINS CIRID CISV CL CONCERN COOPI CORD CPAR CRS CUAMM CW DCA DRC EMSF ERM EQUIP FAO GAA (DWH) GH GSLG HDO HI HISAN - WEPA Horn Relief ILO INTERSOS IOM IRC IRD IRIN JVSF MALAO MCI MDA MDM MENTOR MERLIN NA NNA NRC OA OCHA OCPH ODAG OHCHR PARACOM PARC PHG PMRS PRCS PSI PU RFEP SADO SC-UK SECADEV SFCG SNNC SOCADIDO Solidarités SP STF UNAIDS UNDP UNDSS UNESCO UNFPA UN-HABITAT UNHCR UNICEF UNIFEM UNMAS UNODC UNRWA UPHB VETAID VIA VT WFP WHO WVI WR ZOARC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 Table I: Summary of Requirements – By Sector ......................................................................... 3 Table II: Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation ............................................. 5 2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN NEEDS .................................................... 7 3. REVIEW OF THE COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN ................................................. 11 3.1 SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2 SCENARIOS ............................................................................................................................. 12 3.3 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES MONITORING ........................................................................................ 13 3.4 SECTORAL RESPONSE PLANS................................................................................................... 14 3.4.1 Agriculture and Food Aid (Food Security) ..................................................................... 14 3.4.2 Coordination and Support Services............................................................................... 15 3.4.3 Early Recovery .............................................................................................................. 16 3.4.4 Education ....................................................................................................................... 16 3.4.5 Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS ..................................................................................... 18 3.4.6 Mine Action .................................................................................................................... 19 3.4.7 Multi Sector .................................................................................................................... 20 3.4.8 Protection, Human Rights and Rule of Law .................................................................. 20 3.4.9 Security .......................................................................................................................... 22 3.4.10 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene ...................................................................................... 22 4. FUNDING AND PROJECTS ......................................................................................................... 23 5. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................... 23 5.1 2008 OUTLOOK ....................................................................................................................... 24 LIST OF APPEAL PROJECTS AND IMPLEMENTING STATUS........................................................ 25 NEW AND REVISED PROJECTS ........................................................................................................ 39 ANNEX I. ADDITIONAL FUNDING TABLES ...................................................................................... 40 ANNEX II. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................... 43 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net iii iv UGANDA 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Highlights Peace talks in Juba ongoing. The Cessation of Hostilities Agreement is holding; Few Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) security-related incidents; 1 million Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) still live in camps and 395,000 in new sites/transit; In Acholi, increased freedom of movement has increased access to farmland to 40%; In Lango, Teso and Acholi, lack of services in return/transit areas is jeopardising food security, contributing to voluntary family separation, leaving hundreds 1 of children alone in mother camps Increased security in the North due to the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CoHA) has accelerated the movement out of camps, although the majority, approximately one million IDPs, still remain in 120 camps waiting for more consistent signals that the conflict is over and they can safely go home. In Acholi, approximately 321,000 persons have moved to 334 new settlement areas, mostly settling in their parish of origin where they have better access to cultivable land. In most of the new sites there is an appalling lack of social services that threatens the prospects for lasting stability for the inhabitants. Furthermore, the absence of schools and health facilities in the new sites forces families to adopt a pattern of commuting to the old camp which precipitates family separation exposing women and children to increased risks, including Gender Based Violence (GBV) and other forms of abuse and exploitation. In Lira, Oyam and Apac more than 388,000 IDPs are now permanently resettled in their original homesteads and facing the challenge of rebuilding their lives and livelihoods. A survey conducted by Action against Hunger (ACF2) shows that in Lira, where 83% of the population has returned, the prevalence of GAM has increased from last year and the mortality rate is higher than in the Acholi districts. Preliminary findings of a need assessment conducted in May 2007 indicate that there are critical gaps in access to water, education, health and protection services in new sites and in return areas. This is largely due to a breakdown of facilities, inadequate staffing and staff absenteeism. In Katakwi and Amuria, approximately 28,000 IDPs have moved into new sites and more than 110,000 remain in camps with rising fear of incursions of illegally armed Karimojong. For the majority of people in camps and in new sites, access to their fields is limited to less than four kilometre radius and to less than four hours per day. In Karamoja there is a high sense of insecurity, combined with a continuing deterioration of humanitarian and socio-economic indicators. The killing of a World Food Programme (WFP) worker after food distribution in one of the most food insecure areas, illustrates the gravity of the security threat. While the involuntary disarmament programme continues, it has not yet been accompanied by visible, significant investment. Disarmament operations continue to trigger human rights abuses, although community cooperation with Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) appears to be improving in some districts. Rainfall has been late and inconsistent, causing fears of another poor harvest this year. The humanitarian operation for IDPs faces a triple challenge for the remainder of the year: Continue assisting IDPs in camps prioritising maintenance of services and improvement in camp management; Enhance actions in the new sites by adopting an approach based on the catchment’s area of the parish in which the new site is situated; Step up the recovery efforts for both return and transit areas. Overall, there is an obligation on the part of the humanitarian community to build a response that corresponds to the needs on the ground. This requires improved assistance and protection in the underserved eastern districts, including Teso sub-region (particularly Katakwi and Amuria) and the In Pader District, through rapid assessments conducted during April in 11 sub-counties, 452 children (266 boys, 186 girls) were identified as left behind in mother camps, while caregivers had temporarily moved to transit/return sites. Main protection concerns identified by communities include: sexual abuse and exploitation, engagement in risky behaviors, dropping out from school to cater for household chores and caring for younger siblings. 2 Action Contre la Faim. 1 1 UGANDA entire Karamoja sub-region. On a positive note, the humanitarian situation is stabilising in Acholi camps, where the clusters have benefited from enhanced security to expand their coverage and improve humanitarian response. However, there is growing concern about the humanitarian situation in transit and return areas in eastern Teso and Karamoja. In these areas, most of the clusters have not yet expanded their activities, and food scarcity as well as an absence of basic services, are evident. With the CAP 2007 funded at 54% of the revised funding requirements, the international community is demonstrating commitment to the ongoing humanitarian and human rights effort aimed at helping the people worst affected by conflict and violence. The Government should be encouraged to commit more resources and to boost recovery and development efforts in the northern and north eastern districts. The increase in the 2007 CAP's overall requirements (from $296 million to $318 million) mostly reflects the retroactive counting of funded projects not originally counted in the CAP. A total of $172 million has been contributed or committed to date, leaving the total unmet requirements at $145 million. Some basic facts about Uganda Population Under 5 mortality Life expectancy Percentage of population undernourished Gross national income per capita Percentage of population living on less than $1 per day Proportion of population without sustainable access to an improved drinking water source IDPs (number and percent of population) Refugees In-country Abroad ECHO Vulnerability and Crisis Index score 2006 UNDP Human Development Index score 2 31,000,000 persons 136 p/1,000 (UNICEF 2005) 51.5 (UNFPA State of World Population Report 2007) 19% (UNDP HDI 2006) US$ 280 (World Bank Key Development Data & Statistics 2005) 37.7% (rural 41.7/urban 12.2) (MDG 2002) 40% (UNDP HDI 2006) 1,400,000 (5.7%) (CAP MYR 2007) 220,000 (CAP MYR 2007) 21,752 (UNHCR June 2007) 3 (most severe rank) 0.502: 145th of 177 – medium UGANDA Table I: Summary of Requirements – By Sector Table I: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 Requirements, Commitments/Contributions and Pledges per Sector as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations SECTOR Original Requirements Revised Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Value in US$ A B C C/B B-C D 19,744,800 20,209,380 5,516,516 27% 14,692,864 1,099,634 COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 8,298,108 8,298,108 3,532,915 43% 4,765,193 - ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 7,888,499 9,397,893 3,142,075 33% 6,255,818 - AGRICULTURE 18,508,139 17,908,417 2,345,556 13% 15,562,861 - 127,179,477 134,985,987 95,208,298 71% 39,777,689 - 38,808,449 41,733,911 16,789,710 40% 24,944,201 174,080 5,292,215 5,811,285 1,626,725 28% 4,184,560 - MULTI-SECTOR 17,949,014 25,261,679 12,071,080 48% 13,190,599 - PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW 29,838,284 30,257,361 18,116,802 60% 12,140,559 - - - 864,990 0% (864,990) - 300,000 300,000 - 0% 300,000 - EDUCATION FOOD HEALTH MINE ACTION SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED SECURITY SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS WATER AND SANITATION GRAND TOTAL 6,881,993 7,129,223 4,953,958 69% 2,175,265 - 15,242,143 16,759,760 8,296,617 50% 8,463,143 - 295,931,121 318,053,004 172,465,242 54% 145,587,762 1,273,714 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 3 UGANDA 4 UGANDA Table II: Summary of Requirements – By Appealing Organisation Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 Requirements, Commitments/Contributions and Pledges per Appealing Organisation as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations Page 1 of 2 Original Requirements Revised Requirements Funding % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ A B C C/B B-C D ASB 1,337,000 1,584,230 825,784 52% 758,446 - AVSI 3,288,430 4,169,492 2,595,186 62% 1,574,306 - BRAC FOUNDATION 1,221,138 - - 0% - - 139,000 139,000 - 0% 139,000 - - 887,978 887,978 100% - - 600,000 600,000 - 0% 600,000 - 1,161,450 1,186,527 1,186,527 100% - - - 887,978 887,978 100% - - 3,300,000 3,846,448 546,448 14% 3,300,000 - 505,600 505,600 - 0% 505,600 - 1,865,000 2,329,580 1,424,580 61% 905,000 - Diakonie Emergency Aid - 631,579 631,579 100% - - Diakonisches Werk - 751,366 751,366 100% - - APPEALING ORGANISATION C&D Caritas Germany CCF CESVI CONCERN COOPI CPAR CRS EB FAO FHI FIDA International (previously Finnish Free Foreign Mission) Finnchurchaid 350,000 350,000 - 0% 350,000 - 15,325,000 15,325,000 3,082,952 20% 12,242,048 1,099,634 - 599,617 599,617 100% - - 232,400 232,400 - 0% 232,400 - - 400,000 400,000 100% - - 1,585,000 2,037,907 452,907 22% 1,585,000 - - 1,639,344 1,639,344 100% - - IOM 977,058 977,058 - 0% 977,058 - IRC 3,070,000 4,168,579 1,468,579 35% 2,700,000 - IRIN 111,340 111,340 - 0% 111,340 - 42,200 42,200 7,000 17% 35,200 - - 1,366,120 1,366,120 100% - - MTEE 485,787 485,787 - 0% 485,787 - NOREF 169,071 169,071 - 0% 169,071 - NRC 712,990 954,520 341,530 36% 612,990 - OCHA 3,560,445 3,560,445 2,220,191 62% 1,340,254 - OHCHR 3,309,420 3,309,420 2,090,487 63% 1,218,933 - OXFAM - 360,000 360,000 100% - - OXFAM UK - 1,468,579 1,468,579 100% - - SC - Denmark - 1,698,559 1,698,559 100% - - GAA GOAL ISP IN AFRICA MEDAIR-UK SC - Uganda 1,067,873 1,067,873 - 0% 1,067,873 - TEMEDO 87,200 87,200 - 0% 87,200 - UNAIDS 388,410 388,410 - 0% 388,410 - UNDP 15,622,940 15,622,940 2,740,336 18% 12,882,604 - UNFPA 3,286,505 3,286,505 1,264,041 38% 2,022,464 174,080 UNHCR 28,996,984 28,996,984 12,480,176 43% 16,516,808 - UNICEF 48,010,545 48,010,545 26,475,870 55% 21,534,675 - The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 5 UGANDA Table II: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 Requirements, Commitments/Contributions and Pledges per Appealing Organisation as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations APPEALING ORGANISATION Values in US$ UNIFEM Original Requirements Revised Requirements Funding A B C Page 2 of 2 % Covered Unmet Requirements Uncommitted Pledges C/B B-C D 725,000 725,000 - 0% 725,000 - WFP 131,798,767 139,605,277 95,208,298 68% 44,396,979 - WHO 19,599,725 19,599,725 6,051,523 31% 13,548,202 - 2,430,850 2,430,850 423,729 17% 2,007,121 - 567,993 1,455,971 887,978 61% 567,993 - 295,931,121 318,053,004 172,465,242 54% 145,587,762 1,273,714 WV Uganda WVI GRAND TOTAL NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 6 UGANDA 2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN NEEDS The peace talks between the Government of Uganda (GoU) and the Lord's Resistance Army/Movement (LRA/M) progress at a slow pace. In December 2006 the former President of Mozambique, Mr Chissano, was nominated as UNSG Special Envoy for the LRA Affected Areas. This led to an improved atmosphere in the talks, and two major achievements were made: The signing in April of the third extension of the CoHA (to be reviewed at the end of July); The agreement on Agenda Item 2: Comprehensive Solutions. Agenda Item 3: Reconciliation and Accountability, is currently being discussed and is expected to focus on justice processes for the indicted LRA leadership. Although Agenda Item 4: Demobilisation, Disarmament and Reintegration could offer some difficulties, the mediator is confident that the major obstacles will be lifted through agreement on Agenda Item 3. Due to the slow but positive progression in the peace talks, the security situation has improved. There are now only infrequent LRA-related incidents in Northern Uganda. Consequently, a significant growth in population movement has been registered since November 2006 (see Map I and II). These positive developments are reflected in a downgrading from phase III to phase II in the United Nations security plan. The number of camps that are only accessible with armed escort has declined from twenty-nine in November 2006, to ten (six in Kitgum and four in Pader). Out of those, five are on the border with Karamoja. Meanwhile, the security threat posed by armed elements known as boo kec (criminal groups composed mainly by deserters of various military/militia units) and by illegally armed Karimojong in the Eastern part of Pader and Kitgum, has risen. In some areas these threats could jeopardise resettlement and return of displaced populations. In the affected areas of Katakwi and Amuria, safe access to cultivable land for more than 50% of 139 assessed areas is limited. The average access to land is less than four hours per day in a radius of up to three kilometres, both in camps and new sites3. Map I Areas with population movement as of November 2006 (source: UNHCR) 3 Katakwi and Amuria Inter-Agency Assessments, 12 to 14 February and 13 to 15 March 2007. 7 UGANDA Map II Areas with population movement as of May 2007 (source: UNHCR) In Karamoja, security continues to be patchy. At the end of May, one WFP staff member was killed in an ambush. However, the last six months have witnessed growing confidence building between UPDF and the civilian population, aided by the January changes in military command and the UPDF’s strategic deployment. Consequently, there are now fewer organised raids and ambushes. However a number of human rights violations take place in conjunction with the ongoing disarmament effort. The sense of lawlessness and violence was still widespread during the first five months of 2007, when at least 150 people were killed. Victims include UPDF soldiers, illegally armed Karimojong, unarmed women, children and elders. The United Nations security phase in Karamoja has not been changed and the use of armed escort and flack jackets during field travels is still mandatory for the United Nations system. The overall political environment for humanitarian assistance in Uganda is worsening. During the first half of 2007, there were repeated allegations and prosecutions related to corruption and embezzlement of public social funds. Included in this process is the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, the Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunisation, cadres of the ruling party and former government members. Sectors of civil society and the international community are calling for more transparency and accountability, while the GoU receives external support to fight corruption. Another governance challenge is the repeated questioning of the independence of the judiciary, given that the court is occasionally overruled by the executive. In the North, the change in local leadership following last year’s elections created some incongruence between the elected and appointed district leadership. They sometimes display different approaches to district management, including humanitarian response. Both the central and local government shows little appreciation of the work done by NGOs, who are repeatedly attacked and accused of misconduct. This conduct could harm the Government/NGOs relationship. During the last six months, there has been little progress towards a Peace, Recovery and Development Plan (PRDP) for northern Uganda as well as the Karamoja Integrated Disarmament and Development Plan (KIDDP). The launch of the two plans, which address recovery and livelihood elements in the regions targeted by the CAP, has been postponed once again. Meanwhile, discussions on funding and coordination mechanisms supporting the plans are still ongoing. Once implementation begins, a progressive phasing out of the humanitarian operation will be possible, as well as enhanced synchronisation between emergency and recovery actions. The improved security conditions in the North have created new challenges in the area of human rights, especially in terms of the poor availability and functioning of civilian institutions. The situation is still characterised by a wide range of human rights violations. These include poor access to justice, 8 UGANDA arbitrary arrests and detention in both civil and military detention facilities, and excessive pre-trial detention periods. In Acholi, Lango and Teso sub-regions, measures to restore rule of law and civilian policing are in place under the framework of the Emergency Humanitarian Action Plan (EHAP). Ten High Court Judges and 15 State Attorneys have been deployed to the North and North East 4. However, the judiciary is confronted with a serious backlog of cases which requires further efforts on the part of the GoU. Both human and material resources are needed. 3,700 Special Police Constables and auxiliary forces5 under police command have been deployed, but they are insufficiently trained and equipped. The return of relative secure conditions in the North has created a boost in the trade with South Sudan, and the electrical power production has stabilised. In contrast, a temporary fuel shortage crisis had negative impacts on the local economy, Government departments’ performance and humanitarian operations for a couple of months. In light of the improved security situation, the Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC) approved the “Operational approach for supporting population movements in North and North-eastern Uganda” in December 2006. The statement outlines the modalities for declaring an area safe for return and streamlines the return planning, including the mechanism for the dissemination of information and monitoring. As a result, in Acholi more than 50% of the sub-counties have been officially declared free for movement. The growing number of areas declared open for return has stirred the mushrooming of new settlement sites with most of the population settling in their parish of origin. Contrary to expectations, very few IDPs have permanently returned in their homestead of origin (see Table A). In Pader, population is spontaneously settling in new sites, also in areas not yet declared safe for return. Table A Population movement update as of May 2007* Original Camp Region District Persons (Dec2005) 453,223 310,140 348,624 1,111,987 Current Camp Population New Sites/in Transit Village of Origin Persons % Persons % New Sites Persons % 321,223 244,005 157,624 722,852 71% 79% 45% 65% 118,000 63,985 186,000 367,985 26% 21% 53% 33% 115 55 164 334 14,000 2,150 5,000 21,150 3% 1% 1% 2% Total Lango 350,828 115,275 466,103 39,000 39,000 78,000 11% 34% 17% 311,828 76,275 388,103 89% 66% 83% Katakwi Amuria 70,534 72,417 67,967 42,655 96% 59% 4,499 22,808 6% 31% 33 9 6,954 10% Total Teso 142,951 110,622 77% 27,307 20% 42 6,954 4% West Nile Adjumani 54,460 13,000 24% 41,460 76% Toro - Bunyoro Masindi 67,000 63,500 95% 200 0% 3,300 5% 987,974 54% 395,492 21% 460,967 25% Acholi Gulu/Amuru Kitgum Pader Total Acholi Lango Teso Lira Oyam/Apac Grand total 1,842,501 * All numbers in Table I are estimations. 376 The dramatic growth in the number of new IDPs sites presents a major logistic and programmatic challenge. The response capacity of the humanitarian community cannot match the pace of multiplication of new sites without shifting the focus of the operation from assistance to camp/sites to services at the parish level. Preliminary results of the Inter-Agency Needs Analysis Framework (NAF) undertaken in May 2007 in collaboration with the District Disaster Management Committees (DDMCs), show that in Acholi there has been a 40% increase in land access and around 80% of the population in the new sites have access to their own land. Although a seed and tools distribution campaign has targeted approximately 80% of the population, the survey indicates that production will be affected by the small quantity and the low germination capacity of the seeds distributed. In Katakwi and Amuria, food production is 4 JMC desk review report (preliminary draft, May 2007). 5 JMC desk review report (preliminary draft, May 2007). 9 UGANDA affected by insecurity (limited access and fewer hours spent in the gardens) and bad weather conditions (floods). In Karamoja, a persistent state of insecurity affects food security and is compounded by bad weather conditions that may affect the November 2007 harvest. Increased freedom of movement has eased access to cultivable land in Acholi, fostering alimentary selfsufficiency for the populations in new settlement and areas of return. However, a lack of access to basic services, including education, health and safe drinking water, can quickly jeopardise the gains if a balanced emergency and recovery response from the GoU and its partners is not urgently provided. In addition, the commuting pattern for a significant proportion of the population in new settlement/return areas continues to threaten family unity, as women and children face the risk of abuse, exploitation and neglect. The Government-initiated return of Karimojong women and children living on the streets of Kampala and other major towns, proceeded without informed consent and without due consideration for their choice. Furthermore, this action was not accompanied by adequate support in the areas of return. The action was characterised by misinformation, as well as inadequate consideration of best interests of the child. The cycle of out migration due to lack of livelihood, round up and return without consistent support is likely to be repeated in the period leading to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting. Overall, the humanitarian situation is stabilising in camps in Acholi, where maintenance of services and improvement in camp management are key priorities. There is increasing concern about the new settlement/return areas where recovery activities have not started, as well as the deteriorating situation in camps and new settlement areas in Katakwi and Amuria. The main reasons for this deterioration are insecurity, food scarcity and lack of services and assistance. Priority must be given to camp management in the new settlements in Acholi, to avoid replicating congested and poorly planned camps. In Karamoja, in spite of the 540,000 persons receiving food aid in response to the expected food shortage caused by drought, GAM prevalence for children under five was estimated at 18.6% with 16% moderate and 2.6% severe acute malnutrition. This is more than the double of the emergency threshold6. The deployment of specialised nutrition teams is progressing. Continued assistance and protection for almost 220,000 refugees is required. 6 WFP draft report, Rapid Nutrition Assessment in the Greater Kotido, May 2007. 10 UGANDA 3. REVIEW OF THE COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN 3.1 SUMMARY The strategic priorities for humanitarian response in the CAP 2007 included: Enhance living conditions of IDPs in camps; Support voluntary population movement; Support returned population and the early recovery of their community; In Karamoja, advocate for and improve protection, access to services and emergency preparedness and response; Ensure the delivery of protection to all refugees and asylum seekers - including the respect of their civil, social and economic rights - and pursue all feasible opportunities for durable solutions. The overall strategic priorities defined in the CAP 2007 for Uganda remain largely unchanged. Humanitarian and development partners will step up efforts to geographically refocus the programming to address the humanitarian and recovery priorities of IDPs in camps, IDPs in new settlement sites and returned (see Table B), according to the needs. Table B: Population movement by sub-region as of April 2007 For the remainder of the year, the humanitarian operation will continue to require flexibility to respond to the complexity of these challenges. Recovery and development partners should increase their response capacity to contribute to the stabilisation of returning populations through an increased offer of services at parish level. This should be done in order to avoid regression to an emergency situation and to prevent an IDP impulse to return to the old camps. Data from an ACF survey7 show that in Lira, where 89% of the population has returned, there is a high prevalence of GAM. The mortality rate is also higher than in the Acholi districts. Initial interpretation of these findings points to the lack of access to (and low quality of) services in the return areas. The improved access to land for an increasing returning population requires a revision of the quantity of seeds to be distributed, accompanied by a progressive phasing out of general food distribution. A three month food ration package, to support resettlement, has successfully been distributed in Lira. Securing access and use of land for Extremely Vulnerable Individuals (EVIs) in all regions remains a major concern and a priority for concerted actions. The key objective is to ensure that the most vulnerable are reached and supported in securing livelihoods. In view of the need to improve Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) both in old camps and in the growing number of new settlement areas, the IASC in Uganda has established the CCCM cluster (previously a sub-cluster of protection). The new cluster is to be lead by United Nations High 7 ACF Standardized Monitoring and Assessment of Relief and Transitions Nutritional and Mortality Surveys, Northern Uganda, April 2007 11 UGANDA Commissioner for the Refugees (UNHCR). Priorities for the second half of 2007 include: Coordination of camp actions and programmes implementation; Support to the development of proper lay out for the new sites; Closure and transformation of camps to viable communities; Data collection on camp size and population composition. Considering the present environmental degradation, CCCM conservation/rehabilitation in all activities and programming. will mainstream environment Impact of funding levels on CHAP implementation As of 21 June, donors’ response to the CAP 2007 has been within the average for Uganda. Of the revised amount appealed for, 54% has been committed, compared to 43% of the 2006 Mid-Year Review (MYR). Education is the least funded standing at 13%, followed by mine action (28%), early recovery (33%) and coordination (43%). The crucial health and agriculture sectors are funded at 40% and 27% respectively, while protection and water and sanitations reach 60% and 50% respectively. In some cases, funds have come with restrictions against use in Karamoja. This has hampered the delivery of IASC CAP objectives and extended the marginalisation of the North Eastern districts. Due to a lack of funding at the beginning of the year, there was a breakdown of the food pipeline which in March obliged WFP to reduce the food ration from 60% to 40% of the daily standard food ration. Thanks to a prompt donor response and a Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) grant that brought WFP up to 71% funded, the 60% food rations were resumed in June. However, the lack of timely resources hampered the distribution of a three month ration to support returning populations in Acholi. 3.2 SCENARIOS The most likely scenario portrayed in the CAP 2007 remains valid, with a few additional core assumptions. The electoral process in Kenya is likely to create new waves of displacement around Mt. Elgon, with a possible further influx of displaced into Uganda. The number of people already displaced at the end of May was estimated at approximately 7,000 people. Provision of services and emergency response by the local authorities is expected to be hampered by a lack of resources and capacity. The planning figures have been largely confirmed by the current trend. The only exception is the number of people in Acholi permanently settled in their area of origin. Until now, the return home in Acholi has been slower and less significant than envisaged. On the positive side, the trend whereby movements in the new settlements are organised at clan level, lowers the potential for land-related conflicts. For the rest of the year, the planning figures can be summarised as follow: In Acholi sub-region and Apac district, the presence of IDPs in camps will be reduced from 1.2 million (in November 2006) to 600,000 during 2007. Approximately 600,000 will be in the process of returning, commuting from the mother camp to smallest settlements at parish level and from the latter to their homesteads. By the end of 2007, approximately 150,000 persons will have returned home. In Lira the return home during the first half of 2007 will be completed. Elderly and other vulnerable groups will remain in camps needing special support to return. In Amuria and Katakwi up to 100,000 IDPs will remain in camps, while another 15,000 will resettle or return. In Karamoja up to 500,000 persons will be at risk of food insecurity. 350,000 children need improved support and services to attend primary school, and 300,000 vulnerable people will need targeted, integrated humanitarian activities. Therapeutic and supplementary feeding centres will be opened. It is expected that up to 18,000 Sudanese, as well as 100 to 200 Congolese, may repatriate during second half of 2007. However, a new influx of Congolese cannot be excluded. The overall number of refugees is expected to remain stable, at approximately 220,000. 12 UGANDA 3.3 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES MONITORING In November 2006, the Uganda IASC agreed to conduct periodic monitoring of the humanitarian operation and of the strategic and programmatic priorities. The IASC Working Group was charged with the responsibility to constantly monitor the context and the strategic priorities, while the cluster leads assumed the responsibility to monitor and suggest changes to the operational priorities. In an effort to illustrate the evolution of the humanitarian programmes from November 2006 to May 2007, the following chart presents a brief evaluation. STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR 2007 (from the 2007 CAP for Uganda) Main Goal To work in accordance with the National IDP Policy, the National Refugee Policy, humanitarian principles and international human rights and refugee law, to save, protect and improve lives of vulnerable populations in emergency situations, including in Karamoja, and support displaced and returning communities through promoting self-reliance and increased access to services. Strategic Priorities Enhance protection and living conditions of IDPs in camps. Support voluntary population movement. Support returned population and the early recovery of their community. EVALUATION (on the basis of the indicators in the CAP 2007) The operation is being implemented in accordance to national and international applicable law and has been successful in saving lives, promoting the well-being of vulnerable populations and supporting voluntary return. However, not all populations are receiving the same levels of assistance and the response does not yet correspond to the needs. The most critical unmet needs remain in areas of return in Acholi and Lango, in Karamoja and in Katakwi and Amuria. 45 priority camps have CCCM in place. CCCM has been constituted as a cluster; Ten High Court Judges and 15 State Attorneys have been deployed to the North and North East8, backlog is still enormous and no adequate support received; 1,032 Special Police Constables and 1,250 auxiliary forces9 under police command have been deployed in Gulu, Lira, Kitgum and Pader while 1,760 Special Police Constables including auxiliary forces have been deployed in Teso. Although these officers have all received a basic human rights training provided by Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and UNHCR, the overall general training of one month received before deployment cannot be qualified as adequate; (See programme priorities evaluation). Criteria for population movement agreed by the JMC and publicised in 7 February; JMC operational approach used by the districts to declare areas safe for return movement; Most of the sub-counties in Acholi declared free for movement but for the sub-counties bordering SouthSudan (both in Kitgum and Pader, restrictions to the Faculty of Medicine are still in place in nine sub counties out of 19 each, while in Gulu/Amuru restrictions to the Faculty of Medicine are still in place only in two sub counties out of 19); Most of the new areas are not receiving adequate support. 80% of returning population supported with basic agricultural kits. All returning population in Lira has received three months food ration; Few agencies have begun implementing livelihoods actions in Lira and Teso; Acholi is grossly underserved; Access to basic services in parishes of return in Acholi and Teso is far below acceptable levels. 8 JMC desk review report (preliminary draft, May 2007). 9 Source OHCHR. 13 UGANDA STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR 2007 (from the 2007 CAP for Uganda) In Karamoja, advocate for and improve protection, access to services and emergency response. Ensure the delivery of protection for all refugees and asylum seekers, including the respect of their civil, social and economic rights and pursue all feasible opportunities for durable solutions. EVALUATION (on the basis of the indicators in the CAP 2007) Successful advocacy has increased awareness on Karamoja situation but has not had a visible impact on conduct of the involuntary disarmament operations. Partners for Democracy and Good Governance, Local Development Partners Group and senior United Nations representatives have advocated against the negative consequences of forced disarmament. More human rights and humanitarian partners are deploying to Karamoja; District Focal Point mechanism for early warning and early action in place. Health, food insecurity and nutrition crisis are being responded to, although the scale of the crisis demands more attention; Kotido HC 4 with its surgical unit under rehabilitation, no other significant increase in access to services registered. 8,000 refugees repatriated; 100% of refugees registered and receiving protection and assistance. 3.4 SECTORAL RESPONSE PLANS 3.4.1 Agriculture and Food Aid (Food Security) No. Objectives 1 Enable 170,000 IDP households in the North and North East of Uganda engage in agricultural and livestock production Support establishment of crop and livestock production for 94,000 returnee households Ensure adequate food consumption and production safety nets for 83,000 drought affected households in Karamoja Support food consumption of 36,000 refugee households living in camps in Uganda. 2 3 4 Output (No. of households assisted) Food aid10 Agriculture11 201,000 137,037 Achievement (% of households assisted) Food aid Agriculture 118% 81% 7,000 110,253 7% 117% 91,500 9,000 110% 25% 36,000 10,300 100% 12% The food Security Cluster achieved 93% of its target for food aid and 70% for agriculture. The Cluster will try to fill the gaps and will also continue to provide other forms of assistance to those households that have already been targeted. Refugees The Joint Assessment Mission (JAM) report issued in January 2007 confirmed the need for continued food assistance to 183,000 refugees from Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Sudan, Rwanda and Somalia. The slow levels of repatriation to Sudan are assumed to be linked to the lack of social and economic infrastructure in Southern Sudan. IDPs The Emergency Food Security Assessment (EFSA) conducted in May 2007 is expected to confirm an overall improvement in the levels of self-reliance amongst IDPs in Northern Uganda, due mainly to an increase in land accessible for cultivation. As planned in the CAP 2007, a ration adjustment would therefore be implemented for IDPs with effect from July this year, reducing the general food ration from a prevailing rate of 60% recommended daily allowance (RDA) to 40%. A further assessment will be conducted in August 2007. 10 The rations for IDPs varied between 40% and 60% RDA and 100% for EVIs; The Karamoja beneficiaries received a 50% RDA ration while the refugees benefited from a 40 to 100% RDA ration. 11 The huge majority (90%) of beneficiaries just received tools and seeds while few thousands benefited of ox-ploughs, food processing equipment, small ruminants, fish farming, tree seedlings and training. 14 UGANDA The third phase of Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) land access/use study is being carried out together with WFP in all sub-counties in Acholi sub-region. Preliminary results indicate that land access has increased by 40% across all the districts in the sub-region. While over 80% of the people received seeds, 85% of respondents to the survey indicated that seed quantities were insufficient to enable them to produce enough food, as well as seeds surplus, for the subsequent season. It also emerged that 80% of the livestock was lost during the insurgency. This requires support to restocking and animal draught power for increased productivity and income diversification. Karamoja It is too early to determine if further emergency food aid actions will be required in Karamoja beyond June 2007. The Government Meteorology Department12 has found erratic levels of rainfall in the region, but the overall agricultural and pastoral production levels still depend on rainfall levels in the coming weeks and months. A further EFSA will be conducted in August 2007, which will determine whether or not further emergency food distributions are required. Priorities for the remainder of the year include: Provision of food aid for IDPs where land access is inadequate for own food production and resettlement rations for returning households during the transition period; Provision of full food rations to EVIs; Support to agricultural production to improve and ensure self-sufficiency through: Targeted seeds and tools distribution, seed loans, seed fair and vouchers, local production/multiplication of quality seeds; Support to livestock, especially small ruminants and poultry and fish farming for dietary diversification and income generation; Strengthen the existing extension services and skills development through Farmer Field School, in order to increase adoption of new technologies; Support to enhancement /strengthening of early warning, coordination of actions, standardisation of needs assessments and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. 3.4.2 Coordination and Support Services Indicator Standardised information management system able to inform effective programming Baseline as of Nov. 2006 Not operational Quarterly review done and contingency plans developed according to the evolving context Percentage of timely InterAgency responses to crises N/A Effective cluster coordination in place according to the Terms of Reference for cluster leads Cluster-specific ToRs developed DDMC, Sub-County Disaster Management Committees (SCDMCs) and planning units are able to plan, implement and monitor the operation Number of districts and subcounties with effective coordination mechanisms in place DDMC operational No operational SCDMCs Acholi N/A N/A in Data as of May 2007 Information Management system under development; Population movement data standardised. Periodic review ongoing and contingency plan in case of failure of the Juba talks completed. Health crises (meningitis and cholera outbreaks) timely addressed; Verification of and response to nutritional crisis in Karamoja ongoing; Inter-Agency rapid assessment tool developed. Regular cluster reporting to the Humanitarian Coordinator ongoing; Uneven implementation of ToRs for cluster leads across the clusters. No SCDMCs activated in Acholi; Lack of resources and capacity of the SCDMCs in Teso; DDMCs are main coordinating bodies at district level. No sub-county with effective coordination in place. Priorities for the remainder of the year include: Support to the definition of a Transition Strategy aimed at stabilising returning populations and to provide guidance on the rebalancing of humanitarian relief and early recovery activities. 12 Report dated 25 April 2007. 15 UGANDA Strengthen the coordination capacity in Karamoja through the establishment of an OCHA office with responsibility of supervising Katakwi and Amuria; Improve effective cluster coordination including for Katakwi, Amuria and Karamoja; Support the establishment of sub-county coordination mechanisms. 3.4.3 Early Recovery Assessments by DDMCs and partners in northern Uganda indicate that there are gaps in virtually all sectors in terms of service delivery in areas of return. There is also a need for agencies to appreciate and prioritise cross-cutting issues in return and early recovery. The pace of implementation for early recovery programmes is far too low compared to the rate of return movement. While people are going back to their villages of origin in Lango, and to mid-way return sites in Acholi, initiatives to support meaningful recovery in many of these areas remains inadequate. Although several agencies are beginning to engage in early recovery support, especially in Lango and Teso sub-regions, efforts need to be speeded up in order to seize the opportunities created by the momentum of IDP return. Results of a comprehensive livelihoods study conducted by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), International Organization for Migration (IOM), the Uganda Bureau of Statistics and Norwegian Institute, Institute for Applied International Studies (FAFO) in May 2007 in Acholi and parts of Lango are awaited. Road conditions, mainly the trunk and feeder roads, have improved as a result of agencies engaging in infrastructure rehabilitation and maintenance, which all serves to facilitate return. Voucher-for-work or cash-for work approaches have been successfully applied. Progress in the rehabilitation of social services is reported under the respective cluster. During the next months, the cluster will enhance its coordination capacities through the newly appointed early recovery advisor. Primary focus will be to support the design of a transitional approach for areas of return, based on defined indicators and on the provision of services at the parish level established in function of the catchments’ areas and in proportion to the number of people expected to return (as agreed in the December 2006 JMC statement). 3.4.4 Education Indicator (from CAP) Percentage increase in children enrolled in school by sex Baseline as of Nov. 2006 Primary school enrolment estimated at 1,191,896 (51% girls) in the conflict and post conflict northern, eastern and Karamoja regions. Percentage of children enrolled in catch-up/accelerated learning programmes disaggregated by age and sex 9,508 (59% girls) out of school children between 10-15 years identified in Kitgum and Pader Districts. 42,337 (57% girls) children attending non-formal education programme (Alternative Basic Education for Karamoja-ABEK) in Karamoja region in 328 centres. 16 Data as of May 2007 Comprehensive statistics being compiled. Case studies indicate that in one sub-county in Kotido, 871 Out-Of-School (OOS) children enrolled (493 girls) in the school where the back to school campaign was launched (68% increase); in Lira, enrolment increased by 2,399 (2%) children, while in primary schools in one sub-county in Soroti, 300 OOS children enrolled. In Kitgum District, one sub-county enrolled 199 OOS children (90 girls). Percentage enrolled in Accelerated Learning Programme (ALP) and Alternative Basic Education for Karamoja programmes will be established during last quarter of year. UGANDA Indicator (from CAP) Percentage of schools with safe learning environment Baseline as of Nov. 2006 Average Pupil Stance ratio (PSR) of 1:88 in Lira District. 0% access to pupils thematic curriculum materials. Percentage increase in female teachers/ instructors Percentage increase in early childhood development centres Percentage of female teachers in primary schools is between 20 to 25% in the conflict and post conflict areas and Karamoja region (21% in Lango, 22% in Amuru and Gulu Districts) Number of Early Childhood Development (ECD) centres in Karamoja, Teso and northern regions were 300, with total enrolment of 43,078 learners. Data as of May 2007 Improvements in PSR of Ojwang and Olilim sub-counties of Lira District from 1:88 to 1:72 compared to 1:137 in Pader, 1:82 in Gulu and 1:96 in Kitgum Districts; Access to school water improved in Pader District but the pupil latrine ratio is 130:1; 100% access of P1 learners (153,171) to thematic curriculum materials in conflict affected 18 districts; 57% of primary school learners (1,191,896) in conflict and post conflict districts provided with scholastic materials; 7% (1,191,896) of primary school learners accessing recreational materials; 214 teachers in Pader and Lira Districts trained in psychosocial education and 90 teachers (15 female) from 45 schools trained in special needs education; 103 parents trained in how to support children’s learning in Gulu District; Four district inspectors in Lira District orientated to school monitoring and observational approaches. Statistics being compiled through ongoing school census exercise; 100% (136) female community instructors for the ALP in Kitgum and Pader Districts. 20% increase in ECD learning centres (59), resulting in 12% increase in enrolment (5,578 learners). Advocacy for affirmative action in female teacher recruitment is ongoing, while construction of female teachers’ houses has just started. Payment of hardship allowance to teachers in the north, as a motivational measure, has been included in the 2007/2008 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework. The recently concluded advocacy mission to Kitgum and Pader by the Ministry of Education and Sports made a number of policy recommendations in the area of school inspection, teacher attendance, upgrading of schools for improved staffing, and establishment of secondary schools in selected sub-counties. According to the preliminary findings of the NAF conducted in May 2007, critical gaps in sanitation facilities and safe water sources exist in returned schools. Rehabilitation of school structures, construction of teachers’ houses and limited presence of female teachers are continuing challenges. For the remaining of the year, it is expected that displaced schools in Acholi will begin to return. 17 UGANDA 3.4.5 Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS Indicator Crude Mortality Rate (CMR) and GAM rate among general population and among children under five Number of health facilities rehabilitated and equipped Baseline as of Nov. 2006 No mortality survey was done in Nov. 2006. However, the July 2005 health and mortality survey conducted by Ministry of Health with support from partners gave mortality data of CMR 1.54 and under five mortality rate of 3.18 for Acholi sub-region. The 2006 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey preliminary report was released early this year and gives the figure of infant mortality rate of 106/1,000 live birth. GAM was 4.3%, 5.9% and 4.7% in Gulu/Amuru, Lira and Apac/Oyam respectively in May/June 2006. Plan was to rehabilitate 35 health facilities and construct 50 staff houses Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of epidemics as a measure of effective case management and response time Percentage of IDP camps with facilities that provide HIV testing and counselling services and indicator of consistent availability of test kits According to Services Availability Mapping report of April-May 2006 of Ministry of Health (with support from partners), only 33% of the health centres IV, and none of the health centres III, were providing HIV/AIDS Counselling and Testing. Data as of May 2007 No comparative health and mortality survey has yet been conducted in the region; Plans are under way for Ministry of Health supported by partners to conduct a similar health and mortality survey; In April 2007, GAM was 3.1%, 7.1% and 4.6% respectively in Gulu/Amuru, Lira and Apac/Oyam. This shows a significant decrease in GAM in Gulu/Amuru, stagnation in Apac/Oyam and a worsening nutritional situation in Lira. Work ongoing in nine health facilities; Funds are available for 17 health facilities and 30 staff houses. The Meningitis outbreak in West Nile recorded CFR of 4.1% which is below the 10% CFR expected during such outbreaks; The cholera outbreaks in Kitgum and Kampala which spilled over from last year had CFR of 1.8% and 1%. The World health Organization (WHO) recommended CFR of 1% for such outbreaks. The Services Availability Mapping survey in Lango sub-region is currently ongoing and there are plans to update the Services Availability Mapping report of Acholi sub-region; Note that during the year most of the activities of partners were geared towards strengthening the existing services. Preliminary findings of the NAF conducted in May 2007 show critical gaps in the access to health services in new sites/return areas due to breakdown of health facilities, inadequate staffing and staff absenteeism. For instance, health staffing in Gulu/Amuru is about 34%, most of whom are concentrated in the urban areas. About 50% of health centres in Gulu/Amuru remain closed and in Katakwi and Amuria all health centre IIs are not operational. Immunisation is ongoing in the health units in IDP camps (measles) coverage above 50% of the targets (114% in Gulu, 95% in Kitgum, 98% in Pader, 82% in Lira and 75% in Oyam/Apac). In Katakwi/Amuria immunisation coverage is 73% and in Karamoja 72%. Malaria, Respiratory Track Infections and diarrhoea are the main causes of mortality and morbidity. However, improvement has been registered in management of malaria (net distributions, introduction of coartem and Indoor Residual Spraying). High incidence of diarrhoea diseases in new settlement areas where access to water and sanitation facilities is poor is also a major challenge. While the nutritional situation in Gulu/Amuru has improved, there is a worsening situation in Lira which could be attributed to reduced access to food support, health, and water and sanitation services in the return areas. Although access to land in the return areas has improved, food stocks are low and will remain so until the next harvest in November 2007. There are concerns that there may be further deterioration in the nutritional status of the population between now and the harvest season. To improve access to good quality health care especially in the return areas, there is need to rehabilitate and equip health units and provide incentives such as accommodation and hardship allowance to attract and retain staff. Close monitoring of the nutritional situation in northern Uganda is 18 UGANDA imperative and provision of food support may be necessary to bridge the hunger gap between now and the next harvest. 3.4.6 Mine Action Indicator Numbers of landmine and Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) areas clearly identified, marked and cleared Mine Risk Education (MRE) messages at international standards diffused and returning IDPs exhibiting safe behaviour Baseline as of Nov. 2006 83 landmines and ERW destroyed Increased numbers of landmine victims have access to rehabilitation and physiotherapy services Networks of landmine survivors/victims are established in five landmine/ERW affected districts for information sharing, building skills and psychological support activities Capacity mapped and built through focal points within the Uganda Mine Action Centre (UMAC) and responsible Ministries, civil society and mine action operators developing a national action plan and providing an emergency response Baseline maximum 16 per month at one workshop Gulu Landmine Group established Survivor Capacity mapped and focal points in place at UMAC including the Coordinator of UMAC, Operations Manager and Deputy Operations Manager Data as of May 2007 13 areas identified in Lira and 19 in Soroti 708 Landmines and ERW destroyed. Persons who attended the following activities where MRE messages were diffused: Community awareness 413 Drama groups 1,728 Number of Booklets and Posters distributed 4,510 No increase as there is no funding. Gulu Landmine Survivor Group operational; Lira Landmine Survivor Group reorganised; Kasese Landmine Survivor Group established. Capacity mapped and roles of the UMAC Coordinator, Operations Manager, and Deputy Operations Manager clearly defined; UMAC capacity strengthened with the engagement of the International Management System for Mine Action Officer and initiated recruitment of Mine Action Victim Assistance Coordinator, MRE Coordinator; National plan for victim assistance scheduled for July. With increased return movement, the mine action sector has been instrumental in building more confidence among the IDPs in Lango and Acholi. Needs assessments have been carried out in Lira and Soroti districts, with the identification of respectively thirteen and nine Suspected Hazardous Areas (SHA). The same exercise has been completed in the districts of Gulu, and Kitgum where 91 and 153 SHAs respectively have been identified and partial results from Amuru indicate that 63 SHA have been identified. Following completion of the needs assessments, de-mining operations have been completed in Lira and Kaberamaido districts while the Gulu operation is ongoing. Emergency Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) response has been carried out by demining teams in the district outside tasking orders. EOD responses have been conducted and 708 ERWs/Landmines have been destroyed. 23 UPDF engineers were trained and deployed to conduct demining. An additional 23 man trained police demining team was deployed to Gulu in February 2007. Within the Victim Assistance component, training of trainers and establishment of an income generation cooperative for landmine survivors in Kasese has been completed and funding to further support landmine survivor groups in Gulu, Lira and Kasese obtained. Indicator development has been initiated, as well as establishment of a national surveillance network. Since establishment of the Mine Action Programme, Uganda has reported twice to the States Parties on stock pile destruction through the Article 7 report. 19 UGANDA 3.4.7 Multi Sector Indicator Percentage of refugees registered Number of refugees repatriated to their country of origin Number of people resettled to a third country Improvement of accepted human rights standards for basic social services A functioning asylum system is established in line with the Refugee Bill Baseline as of Nov. 2006 100% Data as of May 2007 100% N/A 8,700 repatriated to South Sudan. N/A 252 refugees departed, and 278 refugees being processed. Drilling underway to provide 16-17 litres per person pre day; 100% of women’s sanitary needs met; 100% of all EVIs issued with mosquito nets. Discussions ongoing with GoU to sponsor a legal team to draft regulations for the implementation of the 2006 Refugee Act. 14.3 litres of water per person per day in West Nile 50% of women’s sanitary needs met 10% of all EVIs issued with mosquito nets N/A Overall, the situation for refugees in Uganda has remained satisfactory. The asylum space has been maintained and there have been no incidents of repression or arbitrary arrest. Durable solutions have been pursued, namely repatriation and resettlement, as per the figures above. Repatriation to South Sudan is gathering momentum, with the return of 8,700 Sudanese to Kajo Keji, Greater Yei and Juba in Central Equatoria State by mid 2007, as compared to 6,000 who repatriated in 2006. Following the initial May 2007 meeting of the Tripartite Repatriation Commission, and in response to refugee demands, the GoU, Government of National Unity of the Sudan and UNHCR have agreed, inter alia, to progressively open a third repatriation corridor to Eastern Equatoria State from where more than 100,000 Sudanese refugees in Uganda originate. No Rwandese refugees have voluntarily repatriated in 2007. According to the refugees, the primary obstacles to return remain poor reintegration prospects (in terms of access and enjoyment of land and property), and scepticism about the equity of the Gacaca system. The vast majority of Congolese (DRC) refugees in Uganda are from the districts of Ituri, North and South Kivu, characterised by insecurity and grave abuses of human rights. Some refugees have indicated their intention to repatriate, but to date, none have actually repatriated with UNHCR assistance. The state of alert remains in place, as there have been recent reports of continued and new displacement in Eastern DRC. This could lead to a new influx of asylum-seekers. Conditions in the settlements have been maintained, with the objective of improving the delivery of services such as water, education and health, as well as the provision of support to EVIs. 3.4.8 Protection, Human Rights and Rule of Law Indicator Number of sustainable returnees and a corresponding reduction in the camp based population Baseline as of Nov. 2006 1,500,000 estimated population in camps Number of persons achieving self-sufficiency and regularly accessing public services in their places of origin 20 Data as of May 2007 1,000,000 estimated population in camps; 365,000 in new sites/transit; 383,000 returned (mainly in Lira, many of them already on the move in November 2006). The situation is not yet sustainable in areas of transit/return; Acute shortage of services in new sites and areas of return. UGANDA Indicator Number of persons formerly associated with LRA receiving support (by type of support) per IDP camp/community of return Baseline as of Nov. 2006 From Jan -Nov 2006: 851 Formerly Abducted Children (FAC)/Persons received at Reception Centres in Gulu, Lira, Kitgum, Pader Number of boys and girls identified as vulnerable by child protection mechanisms receiving support (by type of support) per IDP camp/community of return 52 Child Protection mechanisms established in 52 IDP camps and return communities in Acholi, Lira, Apac and Katakwi. Functioning service-delivery systems for survivors of GBV, including health, legal, protection and psycho-social responses at camp/sub-county and district level 10 -15% camp/sub-counties Percentage of IDPs, returnees and other vulnerable population with access to confidential human rights reporting mechanisms, to legal aid assistance and to adequate response from the responsible institutions Communications Consortium Media Center (CCMC) existing but not fully operational Number of vulnerable household supported with NFI packages in camps and return areas N/A Data as of May 2007 From January-May 2007: 38 children received in reception centres in Lira, Pader, Kitgum and Gulu, the majority of whom have been reunified with their families; In Acholi, Lango and Teso regions, over 1,300 FAC received psycho-social support, Non-Food Items (NFIs), and participated in life skills, educational, and income generating activities. Over 127 Child Protection Committees (CPC) established, but not all are fully operational; CPCs cover 75% of all subcounties in Acholi, 63% in Lango and 40% in Teso region; On average it is estimated that 26 children per month are assisted by a CPC. 25% of sub-counties in Gulu, Kitgum, Pader, Lira, Katakwi and Amuria Districts have in place case management services for GBV survivors; Mobile response in place in Amuru and Gulu where social workers could reach 100% of both districts. CCMC strengthened in Kitgum, Pader, Lira and Gulu through the deployment of two United Nations Volunteers in each centre; Trainings to strengthen the overall CCMC capacity have been ongoing in Acholi, Lango coorganised by UHRC and OHCHR, and in Teso and Karamoja where UHCR has organised the training with Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) support. In 11 priority camps in Gulu and Amuru, 4.6% of the population has been identified as vulnerable and 18.4% of them have been supported with NFI packages; In 11 camps in Lira 1,174 vulnerable have been identified and 2,906 family kits were distributed; In Oyam and Apac 6,000 seed inputs and tool kits were distributed to vulnerable persons. To facilitate freedom of movement and the safe and voluntary return of IDPs to their places of origin, the protection cluster has engaged in significant advocacy efforts both at national and local level. This has resulted in more areas being opened up for freedom of movement. The number of GBV survivors coming forward increased monthly in 2007, as women and girls received information about the availability of services and developed the confidence to come forward for help. There remains however significant gaps in the overall service delivery system for GBV survivors: Coverage is limited to 25% of sub-counties, which means the services are not available for the majority of women and girls; Access to health care and justice are inadequate due to a number of factors, including the lack of technical and operational capacity. 21 UGANDA The return process has heightened vulnerability to GBV for some females, and both prevention and response in this context remain key priorities. Access to (and capacities of) CPC to identify refer, provide community-based solutions and protection to vulnerable children is uneven. This is partly due to the inadequacies of mainstream services and statutory protection services, and partly due to the quality and extent of support CPC receive. As a priority, the Child Protection Sub-Cluster is working with authorities towards the development of minimum standards for CPCs, which includes referral and data collection means, and is developing a unique and practical CPC capacity building programme. Preparedness for return and reintegration of an estimated 3,000 children and women associated with the LRA has been further enhanced. This included the pre-positioning of supplies and capacity building of 14 agencies in Gulu, Lira, Teso, Kitgum and Pader with responsibilities for reception, care, family tracing and information management. Access to justice, GBV, including early marriage and child sexual assault and separation of families during return movements leaving children without caregivers in mother camps, support for EVIs/ Psycho-Social Needs Assessments and transitional justice in the context of the peace negotiations/agreement continue to be amongst the main protection concerns. Newly deployed civilian law enforcement and judicial institutions are yet to receive appropriate resources to resume their functions fully and efficiently with a view to restoring the confidence of the public in these institutions. Training and capacity building for the newly deployed civilian police (Special Police Constables/ Anti Stock Theft Unit) is a priority, as well as the deployment of professional judicial officers. 3.4.9 Security Indicator Larger areas being accessed without military escort Baseline as of Nov. 2006 29 camps in Acholi and all Karamoja requiring armed escort Security coordination centre operational in Karamoja Number of security incidents aimed at humanitarian workers Not operational N/A Data as of May 2007 Ten Camps in Acholi requiring a light Military escort (one escort vehicle); All Karamoja requiring an armed escort. All Staff will be deployed by 11 June 2007. On two occasions WFP trucks have been targeted in Karamoja and the food distribution has been suspended; One WFP staff has been killed in one of the two ambushes. In the Acholi region, five camps in northern Kitgum require military escort (mainly as a result of the LRA threat from South Sudan). Another five camps in Kitgum and Pader require military escort as a result of illegally armed Karimojong infiltration in the area (particularly during the dry season). Some LRA groups in Eastern Equatoria have currently lost communications with LRA Headquarters. The security coordination centre in Moroto has been established. It will become fully operational on 11 June 2007 when additional staff will be trained and deployed. 3.4.10 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene The objectives of providing potable water of 15 litres per day, and of 20 people per latrine stance, have not changed. The table below provides an indicative progress report of cluster achievements. As indicated, the water availability in IDP camps has improved since 2006. This is due to increased water supply and to population movement from camps to the new settlement sites. The same trend is evident for sanitation, although progress is slower than in the area of water availability. Indicator Level of access to safe water in IDP camps in litres per day Baseline as of Nov. 2006 Kitgum 8.5 litres per day Pader 12 litres per day Gulu/Amuru 8.2 litres per day Lira 6 litres per day 22 Data as of May 2007 Kitgum 12 litres per day; Pader 16.7 litres per day; Gulu/Amuru 12 litres per day; Amuru 9.5 litres per day; Lira 8 litres per day. UGANDA Indicator Percentage of people in return areas and in Karamoja who have access to safe water within 1.5 kilometres Baseline as of Nov. 2006 N/A Percentage of people who have access to a sanitary latrine (or dispose excreta through other safe means in times of emergency) Average of 50 persons per latrine stance Data as of May 2007 In Gulu/Amuru, 19 new boreholes drilled and 49 rehabilitated; approximately 40% coverage (borehole ratio 1000:1); In Kitgum, approximately 50% coverage (borehole ratio 621:1); In Pader approximately 34% coverage (borehole ratio 829:1). Kitgum 35 persons per latrine; Pader 33 persons per latrine; Gulu 28 persons per latrine; Amuru 40 persons per latrine. Sector objective as per existing IDP camps has not changed for IDP camps or the return settlement sites. However, the sector focus is expanding to increasingly include the return settlements sites. For example, in Lira, 85% of the population has moved back home. Where there are gross inadequacies of water and sanitation infrastructures, the sector implementation focus is shifting to include these sites. The projects listed in the CAP are still relevant, as most are yet to be funded. It is noteworthy that these projects are designed around the return areas, where there is a growing humanitarian need. Water facilities in the return settlement sites are either non-functional, requiring urgent rehabilitation, or non-existing. The sanitation situation is even worse. Most people are resorting to defecating in the open areas. Evidently, there is an urgent need to provide water and sanitation facilities as well as promote good hygiene practices. Thus, funding is required for all Water and Sanitation projects in the CAP 2007. 4. FUNDING AND PROJECTS Summary Only one project has been withdrawn from the education sector. No other project in the CAP 2007 has been revised. Funding reported as outside of the appeal Increased efforts during the MYR process to include NGOs into the framework of the CAP have resulted in some funded projects originally not counted in the CAP now being counted, with requirements equal to reported funds received. (The purpose is to make the CAP a more comprehensive barometer of funding for the emergency.) Consequently the revised requirements have increased by $14.4 million, matched by an equal increase in total funding, leaving the total outstanding requirements unchanged. The remaining few funded projects outside of the CAP (for which agreement to count them in the CAP could not be secured in time for this MYR) have a total reported funding of $5.4 million. Urgent funding is required for the unfunded projects in under funded sectors (see the list of projects). 5. CONCLUSION The increased freedom of movement, combined with the proportional growth in population movement and access to cultivable land in Acholi, calls for an immediate boost to the humanitarian operation in the new sites. The already large number of new sites is likely to multiply during the next months. The response capacity of the humanitarian community will quickly be overstretched if there is not a progressive shift from camp/site based assistance to sub–county coordination and parish based recovery in collaboration with local Government and development partners. Priorities for this target group include: Provision of food aid for IDPs where land access is inadequate for own food production and resettlement rations for returning households during the transition period; Support to agricultural production and expand opportunities for sustainable livelihood; 23 UGANDA Support to the GoU in the reestablishment of service delivery, including water, sanitation, education, health care, civil policing and access to justice at parish/sub-county level. Although the population in camps will diminish during the next months, a significant number of IDPs will most probably still be in camps at the end of the year. Humanitarian aid and maintenance of service delivery will be the priority for this group. In return areas in Lango, of outmost importance is the upgrade of services and the increase in recovery activities. At the same time, vulnerable groups remaining in camps should be adequately supported. In Katakwi and Amuria the priority is to conduct a better mapping of needs, step up emergency actions in camps and recovery activities in new settlement areas according to identified needs. The approach should be same as outlined for Acholi. A continuous monitoring of the humanitarian and human right situation will be imperative for Karamoja. Food security, nutrition, health and water programmes also need to be stepped up. 5.1 2008 OUTLOOK Based on the assumption that the positive security trend will continue, needs in 2008 and beyond are likely to change in nature, albeit not in scope. Humanitarian and transition needs will coexist for the next 18 to 30 months, with a progressive increase in the latter as the return movement intensifies and is completed. A coordinated and mutually supportive approach, bringing together residual emergency actions and transitional/recovery programming, is key to ensuring a successful termination of the protracted humanitarian crisis in Uganda. Financing of humanitarian aid will still be needed in 2008, to ensure that the humanitarian operation is scaled down in an orderly fashion. The international community must remain appraised of the vulnerability of the population and their humanitarian needs, while progressively turning their attention to recovery and development assistance. The CAP for 2008 will be pivotal to ensure that humanitarian and transition needs are addressed, with the overall objective of stabilising the populations emerging from the crisis. Indicators are being developed to identify the stages and timelines for the transition from humanitarian to recovery programming. The programming of the CAP 2008 shall take into account (and coordinate closely with) the Peace, Recovery and Development Plan related programming, in order to avoid overlapping and/or gaps. 24 UGANDA LIST OF APPEAL PROJECTS AND IMPLEMENTING STATUS Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 1 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ AGRICULTURE UGA-07/A01: Emergency Response to Food Insecurity in northern Uganda AVSI 870,000 870,000 307,366 35% 562,634 - UGA-07/A02: Livelihood security enhancement for returning families affected CRS by Conflict in Northern Uganda 960,000 1,424,580 1,424,580 100% - - CESVI 501,000 501,000 501,000 100% - - COOPI 900,000 900,000 - 0% 900,000 - FIDA International (previously Finnish Free Foreign Mission) 232,400 232,400 - 0% 232,400 - FAO 405,000 405,000 306,477 76% 98,523 - UGA-07/A07: Establishment of income generating activities for IDPs through FAO fish production 608,000 608,000 396,477 65% 211,523 - UGA-07/A03: Improving food security in Northern Uganda UGA-07/A04: Basic Agriculture Support to IDPs and returnees in Northern Uganda UGA-07/A05: Improvement of livelihood security among IDP households in Amuria District (Teso Region) through distribution of agricultural inputs UGA-07/A06: Provide the capacity to farmers to make rational crop management decisions through the creation of 20 farmer field schools for IDPs UGA-07/A08: Post harvest activities: storage and processing of agricultural products for IDPs FAO 1,275,000 1,275,000 180,000 14% 1,095,000 - UGA-07/A09: Improving seed availability and infrastructure for IDPs through private sector enhancing seed voucher schemes FAO 468,000 468,000 - 0% 468,000 - UGA-07/A10: Distribution of starter kits to returnees in Acholi and Lango regions FAO 5,390,000 5,390,000 1,929,998 36% 3,460,002 - FAO 3,035,000 3,035,000 270,000 9% 2,765,000 - FAO 975,000 975,000 - 0% 975,000 - FAO 1,565,000 1,565,000 - 0% 1,565,000 - FAO 660,000 660,000 - 0% 660,000 - GAA 915,000 915,000 - 0% 915,000 - UGA-07/A11: Support agricultural production and income generation for returning families through provision of livestock and animal traction UGA-07/A12: Agriculture, environmental and energy saving support to refugees Joint project with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) UGA-07/A13: Emergency seed support to drought affected households in Karamoja UGA-07/A14: Enhancing rapid livestock emergency response in Karamoja UGA-07/A15: Enhanced community based food security in Moroto District, Karamoja region The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 25 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 2 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ AGRICULTURE (Continued) UGA-07/A16: Improve food security and provide an alternative source of income and nutrition to households residing in the 5 most drought-affected sub-counties in Moroto district, Karamoja C&D 139,000 139,000 - 0% 139,000 - 42,200 42,200 7,000 17% 35,200 - 289,000 289,000 - 0% 289,000 - 87,200 87,200 - 0% 87,200 - ASB 428,000 428,000 193,618 45% 234,382 - FAO - - - 0% - 1,099,634 19,744,800 20,209,380 5,516,516 27% 14,692,864 1,099,634 UGA-07/A17: Support food consumption and production for 900 households ISP IN AFRICA in Karamoja UGA-07/A18: Agricultural and income generation support to vulnerable households living in IDP camps of Gulu and Kitgum districts UGA-07/A19: Agricultural rehabilitation support activities for returnee communities in Soroti, Amuria, Katakwi and Kaberamaido districts UGA-07/A20: Basic food security support to returning IDP’s in Northern Uganda UGA-07/FAO: Awaiting allocation to specific projects Subtotal for AGRICULTURE NRC TEMEDO The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 26 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 3 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES UGA-07/CSS01: Support to comprehensive emergency food security coordination and promote monitoring and evaluation of interventions FAO 424,000 424,000 - 0% 424,000 - UGA-07/CSS02: IDP Information Management IOM 565,108 565,108 - 0% 565,108 - UGA-07/CSS03: Coordination and Support Services OCHA 3,560,445 3,560,445 2,220,191 62% 1,340,254 - UGA-07/CSS04: IRIN Radio northern Uganda IRIN 111,340 111,340 - 0% 111,340 - UGA-07/CSS05: Support for Early Recovery coordination including rapid needs assessments UNDP 1,176,215 1,176,215 - 0% 1,176,215 - UGA-07/CSS06A: Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS response coordination and monitoring in Northern Uganda and Karamoja WHO 1,295,770 1,295,770 1,237,969 96% 57,801 - UGA-07/CSS06B: Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS response coordination and monitoring in Northern Uganda and Karamoja UNICEF 776,820 776,820 74,755 10% 702,065 - UGA-07/CSS06C: Health, Nutrition and HIV/AIDS response coordination and monitoring in Northern Uganda and Karamoja UNAIDS 388,410 388,410 - 0% 388,410 - 8,298,108 8,298,108 3,532,915 43% 4,765,193 - Subtotal for COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 27 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. Appealing Agency PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 4 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE UGA-07/ER/I01: Poverty Reduction and Community Empowerment through Micro-enterprise Development AVSI 280,000 280,000 - 0% 280,000 - UGA-07/ER/I02: Promotion of Rural Financing and Saving Schemes in Lira District IRC 160,000 160,000 - 0% 160,000 - UGA-07/ER/I03: Capacity building of seven District Disaster Management Committees UNDP 358,985 358,985 - 0% 358,985 - UGA-07/ER/I04: Support for sustainable livelihoods of IDPs in return areas in Acholiland UNDP 4,035,612 4,035,612 1,237,087 31% 2,798,525 - UGA-07/ER/I05: Support for sustainable livelihoods of IDPs in return areas in Lango region UNDP 2,658,308 2,658,308 - 0% 2,658,308 - UGA-07/ER/I06: Northern Uganda Livelihood Study UNDP 395,594 395,594 395,594 100% - - UGA-07/ER/I07: Livelihood SC - Denmark - 621,416 621,416 100% - - UGA-07/ER/I08: Livelihood support for vulnerable families affected by the conflict in Northern Uganda Caritas Germany - 887,978 887,978 100% - - 7,888,499 9,397,893 3,142,075 33% 6,255,818 - Subtotal for ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFRASTRUCTURE The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 28 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 5 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ EDUCATION UGA-07/E01: Emergency Education Response for OVCs and former abductees UGA-07/E02 (WITHDRAWN): Non Formal Education Program in Gulu and Lira districts in Northern Uganda AVSI BRAC FOUNDATION 600,000 600,000 - 0% 600,000 - 1,221,138 - - 0% - - UGA-07/E03: Provision of emergency education for IDP children, youth and communities. CCF 600,000 600,000 - 0% 600,000 - UGA-07/E04: Alternative Education for Conflict-Afflicted Children and young people EB 350,000 350,000 - 0% 350,000 - UGA-07/E05: Education for Children and Young People in Conflict Affected Areas of Northern Uganda IRC 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 1,000,000 - MTEE 485,787 485,787 - 0% 485,787 - UGA-07/E07: Education of children affected by armed conflict in North and North Eastern Uganda. NOREF 169,071 169,071 - 0% 169,071 - UGA-07/E08: Access to Quality Education and Retention of school going children in conflict affected districts of Kitgum and Pader NRC 203,990 203,990 - 0% 203,990 - NRC 120,000 120,000 - 0% 120,000 - SC - Uganda 1,067,873 1,067,873 - 0% 1,067,873 - UGA-07/E11: Basic Education UNICEF 2,953,200 2,953,200 1,724,140 58% 1,229,060 - UGA-07/E12: Go to school campaign. UNICEF 1,455,200 1,455,200 - 0% 1,455,200 - UGA-07/E13: Early Learning and Stimulation UNICEF 1,844,680 1,844,680 - 0% 1,844,680 - UGA-07/E06: Quality of Education Initiative in Lango Sub-Region UGA-07/E09: Youth Education Pack (YEP) UGA-07/E10: Protection, Reintegration and Development of Children affected by war in Gulu district. UGA-07/E14A: Support to the establishment Demonstration Gardens, Tree Nurseries and Wood lots in Schools WFP 503,000 503,000 - 0% 503,000 - UGA-07/E14B: Support to the establishment Demonstration Gardens, Tree Nurseries and Wood lots in Schools FAO 520,000 520,000 - 0% 520,000 - UGA-07/E15A: Life Skills, Hygiene and Sanitation Education WFP 454,750 454,750 - 0% 454,750 - UGA-07/E15B: Life Skills, Hygiene and Sanitation Education UNICEF 946,950 946,950 - 0% 946,950 - The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 29 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 6 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ EDUCATION (Continued) UGA-07/E16A: School Rehabilitation UNICEF 1,979,500 1,979,500 - 0% 1,979,500 - UGA-07/E16B: School Rehabilitation WFP 2,033,000 2,033,000 - 0% 2,033,000 - UGA-07/E17: Education SC - Denmark - 621,416 621,416 100% - - 18,508,139 17,908,417 2,345,556 13% 15,562,861 - 127,179,477 134,985,987 95,208,298 71% 39,777,689 - 127,179,477 134,985,987 95,208,298 71% 39,777,689 - Subtotal for EDUCATION FOOD UGA-07/F01: Targeted Food Assistance for Relief and Recovery of Refugees, Displaced Persons and Vulnerable groups in Uganda- PRRO 10121.1 Subtotal for FOOD WFP The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 30 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 7 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ HEALTH UGA-07/H01: Emergency Health Response in IDP camps, return and resettlement areas in northern Uganda AVSI 1,100,064 1,190,827 1,190,827 100% - - UGA-07/H02A: HIV and AIDS UNICEF 1,353,550 1,353,550 472,490 35% 881,060 - UGA-07/H02B: HIV and AIDS WHO 117,700 117,700 - 0% 117,700 - UGA-07/H02C: HIV and AIDS IOM 94,160 94,160 - 0% 94,160 - UGA-07/H02D: HIV and AIDS WFP 88,275 88,275 - 0% 88,275 - UGA-07/H03A: Strengthening & Scaling up basic HIV/AIDS prevention services UNICEF 2,000,900 2,000,900 157,497 8% 1,843,403 - UGA-07/H03B: Strengthening & Scaling up basic HIV/AIDS prevention services WHO 1,824,350 1,824,350 100,000 5% 1,724,350 - UGA-07/H03C: Strengthening & Scaling up basic HIV/AIDS prevention services UNFPA 882,750 882,750 - 0% 882,750 82,390 UGA-07/H03D: Strengthening & Scaling up basic HIV/AIDS prevention services IOM 117,700 117,700 - 0% 117,700 - UGA-07/H04A: Child Health UNICEF 2,148,025 2,148,025 906,707 42% 1,241,318 - UGA-07/H04B: Child Health WHO 1,265,275 1,265,275 320,000 25% 945,275 - UGA-07/H04C: Child Health WFP 205,975 205,975 - 0% 205,975 - UGA-07/H05A: Malaria response for conflict affected northern Uganda UNICEF 1,112,265 1,112,265 787,484 71% 324,781 - UGA-07/H05B: Malaria response for conflict affected northern Uganda WHO 4,401,980 4,401,980 1,015,564 23% 3,386,416 - UGA-07/H06A: Nutrition Response in Emergency UNICEF 1,400,630 1,400,630 314,994 22% 1,085,636 - UGA-07/H06B: Nutrition Response in Emergency WFP 564,960 564,960 - 0% 564,960 - UGA-07/H06C: Nutrition Response in Emergency WHO 329,560 329,560 - 0% 329,560 - The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 31 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 8 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ HEALTH (Continued) UGA-07/H07A: Increase access to CB DOTS and TB/HIV collaborative services WHO 564,960 564,960 80,000 14% 484,960 - UGA-07/H07B: Increase access to CB DOTS and TB/HIV collaborative services WFP 105,930 105,930 - 0% 105,930 - UGA-07/H08A: Scaling up comprehensive HIV/AIDS care and treatment UNICEF 1,588,950 1,588,950 926,000 58% 662,950 - UGA-07/H08B: Scaling up comprehensive HIV/AIDS care and treatment WHO 2,177,450 2,177,450 305,000 14% 1,872,450 - UGA-07/H08C: Scaling up comprehensive HIV/AIDS care and treatment IOM 200,090 200,090 - 0% 200,090 - UGA-07/H08D: Scaling up comprehensive HIV/AIDS care and treatment WFP 158,895 158,895 - 0% 158,895 - UGA-07/H09A: Strengthening Epidemic Preparedness and Response (EPR), and Surveillance WHO 1,836,120 1,836,120 1,028,000 56% 808,120 - UGA-07/H09B: Strengthening Epidemic Preparedness and Response (EPR), and Surveillance UNICEF 1,165,230 1,165,230 - 0% 1,165,230 - UGA-07/H09C: Strengthening Epidemic Preparedness and Response (EPR), and Surveillance WFP 147,125 147,125 - 0% 147,125 - UGA-07/H10A: Strengthening Health systems in conflict and post conflict affected areas UNICEF 2,795,375 2,795,375 4,330,044 155% (1,534,669) - UGA-07/H10B: Strengthening Health systems in conflict and post conflict affected areas WHO 2,436,390 2,436,390 510,000 21% 1,926,390 - WHO 606,155 606,155 85,000 14% 521,155 - WHO 741,510 741,510 50,000 7% 691,510 - UGA-07/H13A: Promotion of sexual and reproductive health among young people in Northern Uganda and Karamoja region WHO 294,250 294,250 40,000 14% 254,250 - UGA-07/H13B: Promotion of sexual and reproductive health among young people in Northern Uganda and Karamoja region UNFPA 411,950 411,950 298,954 73% 112,996 82,390 UGA-07/H13C: Promotion of sexual and reproductive health among young people in Northern Uganda and Karamoja region UNICEF 176,550 176,550 - 0% 176,550 - UGA-07/H11: Mental Health, Psychosocial Support and Non Communicable Diseases (NCD) in conflict affected population in Northern Uganda UGA-07/H12: Prevention and Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 32 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 9 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ HEALTH (Continued) UGA-07/H14A: Strengthening delivery of integrated Reproductive health and new born care services in Northern Uganda & Karamoja region UGA-07/H14B: Strengthening delivery of integrated Reproductive health and new born care services in Northern Uganda & Karamoja region UGA-07/H14C: Strengthening delivery of integrated Reproductive health and new born care services in Northern Uganda & Karamoja region UGA-07/H15: Northern Uganda Malaria & HIV/AIDS Program UGA-07/H16: Health Support Programme for War Affected in Northern Uganda UGA-07/H17: Integrated public health assistance for conflict affected populations at new returnee sites and in existing IDP camps, Kitgum District, Northern Uganda Subtotal for HEALTH WHO 706,200 706,200 250,000 35% 456,200 - 1,235,850 1,235,850 628,953 51% 606,897 9,300 588,500 588,500 157,497 27% 431,003 - WV Uganda 1,862,850 1,862,850 - 0% 1,862,850 - MEDAIR-UK - 1,366,120 1,366,120 100% - - OXFAM UK - 1,468,579 1,468,579 100% - - 38,808,449 41,733,911 16,789,710 40% 24,944,201 174,080 UNFPA UNICEF The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 33 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 10 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ MINE ACTION UGA-07/MA01: Community Based Mine Risk Education and Victim Assistance AVSI in Northern Uganda UGA-07/MA02: Mine Risk Education for Landmine Affected Communities and Schools in Northern Uganda UGA-07/MA03: Conducting Mine Action Needs Assessment and Safe Return for Internally Displace Persons Through the Release of Land by Mine Clearance, Technical Survey, EOD in a Highly Efficient Manner UGA-07/MA04: Protection of Rights During Return of Vulnerable Internally Displaced Landmine Victims from Camps to Homestead Through Affirmative Action, Access to Services and Increased Inclusion Opportunities Into Their Returned Communities UGA-07/MA05: Building National Ownership and Capacity for an Integrated Model of Mine Action for a Safe and Protected Return of IDP UGA-07/MA06: Protecting IDP within Early Return In Mine Affected Areas for Specific Protection Arising Out of Identified Suspected Hazardous Areas in Northern Uganda UGA-07/MA07: Mine Action Programme Subtotal for MINE ACTION 42,789 42,789 - 0% 42,789 - CPAR 505,600 505,600 - 0% 505,600 - UNDP 1,141,695 1,141,695 225,395 20% 916,300 - UNDP 2,400,371 2,400,371 248,390 10% 2,151,981 - UNDP 949,760 949,760 296,390 31% 653,370 - UNDP 252,000 252,000 337,480 134% (85,480) - - 519,070 519,070 100% - - 5,292,215 5,811,285 1,626,725 28% 4,184,560 - AVSI The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated informatio n on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 34 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Funding Page 11 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Values in US$ MULTI-SECTOR UGA-07/MS01: Protection, basic assistance and durable solutions for refugees. UNHCR 17,949,014 17,949,014 4,758,415 27% 13,190,599 - UGA-07/MS02: Child nutrition III, emergency education programme for children, child resilience and capacity development SC - Denmark - 278,180 278,180 100% - - UGA-07/MS03: Multi-sectoral intervention in camps and return areas in Pader and Lira Districts, Northern Uganda COOPI - 546,448 546,448 100% - - WVI - 887,978 887,978 100% - - UGA-07/MS05: Emergency Health and Protection Programme for Northern Uganda IRC - 1,098,579 1,098,579 100% - - UGA-07/MS06: Assistance to Conflict-Affected Populations in Agago County, Pader District, Northern Uganda GOAL - 1,639,344 1,639,344 100% - - UGA-07/MS07: Multi-sector assistance to internal refugees in Northern Uganda Finnchurchaid - 400,000 400,000 100% - - UGA-07/MS08: Distribution of NFIs, rehabilitation and drilling of new boreholes GAA - 452,907 452,907 100% - - Diakonie Emergency Aid - 631,579 631,579 100% - - Diakonisches Werk - 751,366 751,366 100% - - - 26,667 26,667 100% - - - 599,617 599,617 100% - - 17,949,014 25,261,679 12,071,080 48% 13,190,599 - UGA-07/MS04: Reintegration Support Project UGA-07/MS09: Distribution of NFIs and watsan UGA-07/MS10: Support for returning IDPs UGA-07/MS11: Emergency Preparedness and Post-Emergency Rehabilitation OXFAM (EPPR) UGA-07/MS12: Agriculture, food security, water, sanitation and hygiene Subtotal for MULTI-SECTOR FHI The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 35 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 12 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW UGA-07/P/HR/RL01: Promotion of return and improved protection of IDPs and returnees in northern Uganda AVSI 313,434 313,434 224,551 72% 88,883 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL02: Protection and advocacy on land issues to facilitate post conflict recovery in northern Uganda. CRS 115,000 115,000 - 0% 115,000 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL03: Protection from Sexual and Gender Based Violence and Care of Survivors in Northern Uganda. COOPI 400,000 400,000 - 0% 400,000 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL04: Information, Counseling and Legal Assistance NRC 100,000 341,530 341,530 100% - - UGA-07/P/HR/RL05: Justice, Human Rights, Peace building and Reconciliation OHCHR 662,020 662,020 490,374 74% 171,646 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL06: Assistance to Karamoja in the field of human rights OHCHR 992,351 992,351 334,205 34% 658,146 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL07: Assistance to northern Uganda in the field of human rights OHCHR 1,655,049 1,655,049 1,265,908 76% 389,141 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL08: Child protection UNICEF 5,424,900 5,424,900 5,455,777 101% (30,877) - UGA-07/P/HR/RL09A: Preventing and responding to gender-based violence UNICEF 2,276,960 2,276,960 833,330 37% 1,443,630 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL09B: Preventing and responding to gender-based violence UNIFEM 725,000 725,000 - 0% 725,000 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL09C: Preventing and responding to gender-based violence WHO 749,000 749,000 130,000 17% 619,000 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL09D: Preventing and responding to gender-based violence UNFPA 385,200 385,200 336,134 87% 49,066 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL10A: Return and reintegration of persons formerly with the LRA UNICEF 2,488,000 2,488,000 666,665 27% 1,821,335 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL10B: Return and reintegration of persons formerly with the LRA UNDP 1,954,400 1,954,400 - 0% 1,954,400 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL11: Protection, basic assistance and durable solutions for IDPs. UNHCR 11,047,970 11,047,970 7,721,761 70% 3,326,209 - 549,000 549,000 139,020 25% 409,980 - - 177,547 177,547 100% - - 29,838,284 30,257,361 18,116,802 60% 12,140,559 - UGA-07/P/HR/RL12: Protection and basic assistance of retuning IDP’s in Northern Uganda UGA-07/P/HR/RL13: Child resilience Subtotal for PROTECTION/HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW ASB SC - Denmark The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 36 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 13 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED UGA-07/WHO: Awaiting allocation to specific project WHO - - 864,990 0% (864,990) - - - 864,990 0% (864,990) - 300,000 300,000 - 0% 300,000 - 300,000 300,000 - 0% 300,000 - 6,314,000 6,314,000 4,706,728 75% 1,607,272 - Subtotal for SECTOR NOT YET SPECIFIED SECURITY UGA-07/S01: Establishment of an effective radio communication network for the humanitarian community in Uganda. UNDP Subtotal for SECURITY SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS UGA-07/S/NF01: Emergency Non-Food Items UNICEF UGA-07/S/NF02: Relief Items for IDPs in Northern Uganda WVI 567,993 567,993 - 0% 567,993 - UGA-07/S/NF03: Distribution of NFIs ASB - 247,230 247,230 100% - - 6,881,993 7,129,223 4,953,958 69% 2,175,265 - Subtotal for SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 37 UGANDA Table III: Consolidated Appeal for Uganda 2007 List of Appeal Projects (grouped by sector), with funding status of each as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. PROJECT CODE: Sector/Activity Appealing Agency Original Revised Requirements Requirements Page 14 of 14 % Unmet Uncommitted Covered Requirements Pledges Funding Values in US$ WATER AND SANITATION UGA-07/WS01: Emergency Water and Sanitation Response in IDP camps and transitional areas in northern Uganda AVSI 82,143 353,372 353,372 100% - - CRS 790,000 790,000 - 0% 790,000 - CESVI 660,450 685,527 685,527 100% - - COOPI 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 0% 2,000,000 - 670,000 670,000 - 0% 670,000 - IRC 1,910,000 1,910,000 370,000 19% 1,540,000 - UGA-07/WS07: Water and Sanitation UNICEF 5,665,650 5,665,650 3,154,984 56% 2,510,666 - UGA-07/WS08A: Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation UNICEF 1,554,710 1,554,710 1,806,778 116% (252,068) - UGA-07/WS08B: Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation UNFPA 370,755 370,755 - 0% 370,755 - UGA-07/WS08C: Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation WFP 357,380 357,380 - 0% 357,380 - UGA-07/WS08D: Hygiene and Environmental Sanitation WHO 253,055 253,055 35,000 14% 218,055 - ASB 360,000 360,000 245,916 68% 114,084 - UGA-07/WS10: Watsan Emergency Aid for Northern Uganda WV Uganda 568,000 568,000 423,729 75% 144,271 - UGA-07/WS11: Pader Emergency Water and Sanitation Project CONCERN - 887,978 887,978 100% - - OXFAM - 333,333 333,333 100% - - 15,242,143 16,759,760 8,296,617 50% 8,463,143 - 295,931,121 318,053,004 172,465,242 54% 145,587,762 1,273,714 UGA-07/WS02: Support to Emergency Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene for IDPs and returnee populations in Gulu, Amuru and Pader districts of Northern Uganda. UGA-07/WS03: Improvement of water and sanitation facilities and capacity building for continued sustainability. UGA-07/WS04: Water and Sanitation interventions in Northern Uganda UGA-07/WS05: Support to Emergency Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene for returnee populations in Lira District, Northern Uganda UGA-07/WS06: Emergency water supply and sanitary facilities for returning populations to place of origins in Northern Lira and Kitgum Districts UGA-07/WS09: Promotion of Hygiene and Sanitation activities for returning IDP’s in Pader district UGA-07/WS12: Improve access to adequate levels of water, sanitation, hygiene items and hygiene education for the most vulnerable people affected by conflict Subtotal for WATER AND SANITATION Grand Total GAA The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 38 UGANDA NEW AND REVISED PROJECTS No new or revised project sheets were received, whereas project sheet UGA-07/E02 of the BRAC FOUNDATION with original requirements of $1,221,138 was deleted. 39 UGANDA ANNEX I. ADDITIONAL FUNDING TABLES Table IV: Uganda 2007 Total Funding per Donor (to projects listed in the Appeal) (carry over not included) as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations DONOR % of Grand Total Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ United States 46,746,498 27.1 % - United Kingdom 32,287,398 18.7 % 174,080 European Commission (ECHO) 23,072,817 13.4 % - Carry-over (donors not specified) 15,678,368 9.1 % - Sweden 8,950,715 5.2 % 1,099,634 Canada 7,847,783 4.6 % - Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 7,000,000 4.1 % - Netherlands 6,125,527 3.6 % - Norway 4,745,296 2.8 % - Australia 2,788,007 1.6 % - Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 2,453,666 1.4 % - Germany 2,415,720 1.4 % - Finland 2,022,951 1.2 % - Japan 2,008,925 1.2 % - Denmark 1,698,559 1.0 % - Switzerland 1,255,435 0.7 % - Ireland 1,238,628 0.7 % - Belgium 1,161,011 0.7 % - Private (individuals & organisations) 733,464 0.4 % - Spain 666,665 0.4 % - none 560,282 0.3 % - Italy 311,455 0.2 % - Austria 250,045 0.1 % - France 240,202 0.1 % - Turkey 200,000 0.1 % - Others 5,825 0.0 % - 172,465,242 100.0 % 1,273,714 Grand Total NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 40 UGANDA Table V: Uganda 2007 Total Humanitarian Assistance per Donor (Appeal plus other*)(carry over not included) as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations DONOR % of Grand Total Funding Uncommitted Pledges Values in US$ United States 47,008,613 26.4 % - United Kingdom 32,287,398 18.1 % 174,080 European Commission (ECHO) 24,835,112 14.0 % 1,763,943 Carry-over (donors not specified) 15,678,368 8.8 % - Sweden 9,072,572 5.1 % 1,099,634 Canada 8,271,512 4.6 % - Netherlands 8,125,527 4.6 % - Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 7,000,000 3.9 % - Norway 4,745,296 2.7 % - Australia 2,788,007 1.6 % - Allocations of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 2,453,666 1.4 % - Germany 2,415,720 1.4 % - Denmark 2,051,318 1.2 % - Finland 2,022,951 1.1 % - Japan 2,008,925 1.1 % - Switzerland 1,255,435 0.7 % - Ireland 1,238,628 0.7 % - Belgium 1,161,011 0.7 % - Austria 779,846 0.4 % - Private (individuals & organisations) 733,464 0.4 % - Spain 666,665 0.4 % - none 560,282 0.3 % - Italy 311,455 0.2 % - France 240,202 0.1 % - Turkey 200,000 0.1 % - Others 5,825 0.0 % - 177,917,798 100.0 % 3,037,657 Grand Total NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. * includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process (bilateral, Red Cross, etc...) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 41 UGANDA Table VI: Other Humanitarian Funding to Uganda 2007 List of commitments/contributions and pledges to projects not listed in the Appeal as of 21 June 2007 http://www.reliefweb.int/fts Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by Donors and Appealing Organisations. CHANNEL Description Uncommitted Pledges Funding Values in US$ Austria ICRC Assistance and protection Subtotal for Austria 529,801 - 529,801 - 423,729 - 423,729 - 352,759 - 352,759 - 1,762,295 - - 1,763,943 1,762,295 1,763,943 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 121,857 - 121,857 - Canada MSF Health activities (M-012491) Subtotal for Canada Denmark Danish RC Refugees in Uganda (46.H.7-1-147) Subtotal for Denmark European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office ICRC Economic assistance, protection/prevention, health and water/sanitation for the vulnerable (ECHO/UGA/BUD/2007/01007) UN Agencies, NGOs and Red Cross Humanitarian Aid for victims of conflict and natural disasters in Northern Uganda [ECHO/UGA/BUD/2007/01000-uncommitted balance from orig pledge of Euro 13 mn] Subtotal for European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office Netherlands MSF Public Health emergency assistance (15966 (DMV0097867) Subtotal for Netherlands Sweden SRSA WES officer through Unicef Subtotal for Sweden United States of America LWR Admin support 5,115 - USAID/Uganda Admin support 257,000 - 262,115 - 5,452,556 1,763,943 Subtotal for United States of America Grand Total NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed). Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be contributed. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 21 June 2007. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (www.reliefweb.int/fts). 42 UGANDA ANNEX II. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACF ALP ASB AVSI Action Against Hunger Accelerated Learning Programme Arbeiter Samariter-Bund Deutschland e.V Associazione Volontari per il Servizio Internazionale BRAC FOUNDATION Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee Foundation C&D CAP CB DOTS CCCM CCF CCMC CERF CESVI CFR CHAP CMR CoHA COOPI CPAR CPCs CRS Cooperation and Development Consolidated Appeal Process Community-Based Directly Observed Treatment Short Course Camp Coordination and Camp Management Christian Children’s Fund Communications Consortium Media Center Central Emergency Response Fund Cooperazione e’ Sviluppo Case Fatality Rate Common Humanitarian Action Plan Crude Mortality Rate Cessation of Hostilities Agreement Cooperazione Internazionale Canadian Physicians for Aid & Relief Child Protection Committees Catholic Relief Services DANIDA DDMC DRC Danish International Development Agency District Disaster Management Committee Democratic Republic of the Congo EB ECD EFSA EHAP EOD EPR ERW EVIs Education Base Early Childhood Development Emergency Food Security Assessment Emergency Humanitarian Action Plan Explosive Ordnance Disposal Emergency Preparedness and Response Explosive Remnants of War Extremely Vulnerable Individuals FAC FAFO FAO FIDA FTS Formerly Abducted Children Institute for Applied International Studies (Norway) Food and Agriculture Organization The Uganda Association of Women Lawyers Financial Tracking Service GAA GAM GBV GoU German Agro Action Global Acute Malnutrition Gender Based Violence Government of Uganda HC HIV/AIDS Humanitarian Coordinator Human Immuno-deficiency Virus/ Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome IASC IDP IOM IRC IRIN ISP Inter-Agency Standing Committee Internally Displaced Person International Organization for Migration International Rescue Committee Integrated Regional Information Network Insieme Si Può JAM JMC Joint Assessment Mission Joint Monitoring Committee KIDDP Karamoja Integrated Disarmament and Development Plan LRA LRA/M Lord's Resistance Army Lords’ Resistance Army/Movement 43 UGANDA MDG MRE MTEE MYR Millennium Development Goal Mine Risk Education Mango Tree Educational Enterprises Mid-Year Review NAF NFI NGO NOREF NRC Needs Analysis Framework Non-Food Item Non-Governmental Organisation Northern Region Education Forum Norwegian Refugee Council OCHA OHCHR OOS Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Out-of-School PRDP PSR Peace, Recovery and Development Plan Pupil Stance Ratio RDA Recommended Daily Allowance SCDMC SC-Uganda SHA Sub-County Disaster Management Committee Save the Children-Uganda Suspected Hazardous Areas TB TEMEDO ToR Tuberculosis Temele Development Organisation Terms of Reference UMAC UNAIDS UNDP UNFPA UNHCR UNICEF UNIFEM UPDF Uganda Mine Action Centre United Nations Joint Programme on HIV and AIDS United Nations Development Programme United Nations Population Fund United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees United Nations Children’s Fund United Nations Development Fund for Women Uganda People’s Defence Forces WFP WHO WVU World Food Programme World Health Organization World Vision Uganda YEP Youth Education Pack 44 Consolidated Appeal Feedback Sheet If you would like to comment on this document please do so below and fax this sheet to + 41–22–917–0368 (Attn: CAP Section) or scan it and email us: CAP@ReliefWeb.int Comments reaching us before 1 September 2007 will help us improve the CAP in time for 2008. Thank you very much for your time. Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) Section, OCHA Please write the name of the Consolidated Appeal on which you are commenting: 1. How could it be improved? 2. Is the context and prioritised humanitarian need clearly presented? How could it be improved? 3. To what extent do response plans address humanitarian needs? How could it be improved? 4. To what extent are roles and coordination mechanisms clearly presented? How could it be improved? 5. To what extent are budgets realistic and in line with the proposed actions? How could it be improved? 6. Is the presentation of the document lay-out and format clear and well written? How could it be improved? Please make any additional comments on another sheet or by email. Name: Title & Organisation: Email Address: NOTES: O FFI CE FO R THE C O O RDI N ATI O N O F HUM ANI T ARI AN AF F AI RS (OCHA) UNITED NATIONS NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017 USA PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10 SWITZERLAND
