MGT 530: Business Ethics and Sustainability Credit Hours: 3 Contact Hours: This is a 3-credit course, offered in accelerated format. This means that 16 weeks of material is covered in 14 weeks. The exact number of hours per week that you can expect to spend on each course will vary based upon the weekly coursework, as well as your study style and preferences. You should plan to spend 14-15 hours per week in each course reading material, interacting on the discussion boards, writing papers, completing projects, and doing research. Faculty Information Name: Phone: CSU-GC Email: Virtual Office Hours: Course Description and Outcomes This course starts out with an introduction to corporate sustainability, what it is, and why it is important. The Corporate Sustainability Model is introduced to the learner. Additionally, the learner looks at the importance of identifying stakeholders and understanding accountability. From there, the course moves toward the management side of corporate ethics and sustainability, looking at the board members; and CEO’s roles in sustainability, developing a sustainability strategy, and global perspectives of sustainability. Additional topics discussed included government regulations, codes of conduct, information flow, philanthropy, and outsourcing as they relate to sustainability. Next, the course moves to the investments and risks associated with sustainability. Specifically, learners will examine the capital investment decision process, capital budgeting, costs in the decision-making process, costing systems, risk assessment, incentives and rewards, performance evaluation systems, and shareholder value analysis. From there, the course moves on to specifically focus on the social, environmental, and economic impacts of corporate sustainability. This involves understanding the concept of value, and developing methodologies for measuring social and environmental impacts and risks. The implementation of such a system involves mapping actions to drive performance, develop sustainability performance metrics, engagement with stakeholders, measurement of the corporate reputation and, the social and environmental risks and impacts. Finally, the course moves into looking at improvement, reporting, verification, and benefits of sustainability for corporations and society. Learners will explore topics such as organizational learning, improving sustainability performances, identifying and recognizing appropriate societal and environmental impacts, internal and external reporting, verifying sustainability performance, and internal and external sustainability audits. Last, the learners will look at making sustainability work, using the Corporate Sustainability Model to improve performance, positively influence external stakeholders, and create opportunities for innovation. Course Learning Outcomes 1. Examine the components of corporate sustainability and ethics and the impact on society and economics. 2. Analyze leadership’s role in creating and organizing a corporate sustainability strategy focusing on the identified stakeholders. 3. Synthesize the relationship between the capital investment and capital budgeting processes, costing systems, and risk assessment. 4. Explore the foundations of measuring social, environmental, and economic impacts of sustainability systems. 5. Evaluate the benefits of implementing a social, environmental, and economic impact measurement system. 6. Analyze the steps taken to improve corporate processes, products, and projects for corporate sustainability. 7. Examine external sustainability reporting and verification methods for the stakeholders. 8. Evaluate the benefits of sustainability and ethics for corporations and society as a whole. Participation & Attendance Prompt and consistent attendance in your online courses is essential for your success. Failure to verify your attendance within the first 7 days of this course may result in your withdrawal. If for some reason you would like to drop a course, please contact your advisor. Online classes have deadlines, assignments, and participation requirements just like on-campus classes. Budget your time carefully and keep an open line of communication with your instructor. If you are having technical problems, problems with your assignments, or other problems that are impeding your progress, let your instructor know as soon as possible. Course Materials Required: Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing. ISBN-13 9781576754863 Course Schedule Due Dates The Academic Week begins on Saturday and ends the following Friday. Discussion Activities: Application of knowledge is an important step in the learning experience and every course has key discussions wherein students can apply and analyze content as well as move toward synthesis. This course has Discussion Forums that provide learners an extended opportunity to interact with one another in an instructor-facilitated dialogue that focuses on key course themes. Students will apply and synthesize knowledge learned to case studies simulating real-world decisionmaking. Mastery Exercises: These exercises will assess learner knowledge in each topic area. Critical Thinking Application Assignments: each assignment will require students to apply their knowledge learned in the module to real-world scenarios. Final Exam: The exam will assess learner knowledge. Week # Readings 1 2 3 4 5 Assignments Introduction & Chapter 1 in Making Sustainability Work Morris, N. (2004, Oct/Nov). Sustainability: What is it? Power Engineer, 18(5), 11. Steger, U., Salzmann, O., & Ionescu-Somers, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: Beyond the hype. European Business Forum, 32, 40-45. Discussion Board (25 points) Critical Thinking (60 points) Chapter 2 in Making Sustainability Work Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., & Yuthas, K. (2010). Implementing Sustainability: The Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture. Strategic Finance, 91 (10), 41-47. Verizonbusiness (2010, December 17) Perspectives from the C-Suite: Leadership and Sustainability [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjNZGs5e_FE Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Chapter 3 in Making Sustainability Work Prattipati, S. N. (2010). Sustainability and the Role of Information and Communications Technologies. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 5(2), 23-40. Chapter 4 in Making Sustainability Work Buchanan, S. (2010). Integrating Sustainability into the Capital Planning Process. Area Development Site and Facility Planning. 45(5), 41-12. YouTube Video: Dave Mowat: Sustainability: Does it Cost Money or Make Money? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tNee6ohuQ0 Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise(0 pts) Discussion Board (25 pts) Critical Thinking (60 pts) Chapter 5 in Making Sustainability Work Dutta, S. K., & Lawson, R. A. (2009). Aligning Performance Evaluation and Reward Systems with Corporate Sustainability Goals. Cost Management, 23(6), 15-23. Dias-Sardinha, I., & Reijnders, L. (2001). Environmental performance evaluation and sustainability performance evaluation of organizations: an evolutionary framework. Management and Auditing, 8(2), 71. Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Chapter 6 in Making Sustainability Work Prieto-Carron, M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., Muro, A., & Bhushan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know. International Affairs, 82(5), 977987. Discussion Board (25 pts) Chapter 6 in Making Sustainability Work Bekefi, T., & Epstein, M. J. (2008). Measuring and Managing Social and Political Risk. Strategic Finance, 89 (8), 33-41. Bekefi, T., Epstein, M. J. (2008). Transforming Social and Environmental Risks into Opportunities. Strategic Finance, 89 (9), 42-47. Youtube Video: Managing environmental risks & strengthening stakeholder engagement http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMdRbjDtfTA Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Chapter 7 in Making Sustainability Work Weaver, A., Pope, J. Morrison-Saunders, A., & Lochner, P. (2008). Contributing to sustainability as an environmental impact assessment practitioner. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(2), 91-98. Chapter 7 in Making Sustainability Work Gao, S. S., & Zhang, J. J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 722. YouTube Video: Stakeholder Engagement: Top 3 Sustainability Communications Practices Discussion Board (25 pts) Critical Thinking (60 pts) Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Chapter 8 in Making Sustainability Work Iarossi, J., Miller, J. K., O'Connoer, J., & Keil, M. (2001). Addressing the Sustainability Challenges; Insights from Institutional Theory and Organizational Learning. SSRN Working Paper Series. YouTube Video: Improving sustainability at UPM Shotton paper mill http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8aAokUzJu4 Discussion Board (25 pts) Critical Thinking (60 pts) Chapter 8 in Making Sustainability Work Evers, P., Harmon, W. K., & Ivancevich, S. H.(2004). Sustainability Reporting: Implications for Internal Auditors. Internal Auditing, 19 (2), 21-27. Starbuck, S. , & Singer, S. (2010). Climate Change and Sustainability: Five Highly Charged Risk Areas for Internal Audit. Internal Auditing, 25(4), 3-9. Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Chapter 9 in Making Sustainability Work Kiernan, M. (1993). The new strategic architecture: Learning to compete in the twenty-first century. Academy Discussion Board 25 pts) Critical Thinking (60 pts) 6 7 8 9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdBOe6mLU5w 10 11 12 13 of Management Executive 7 (1), 7–21. YouTube Video: What is Auditing: Internal vs. External? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-ko4n-Hyjs Chapter 9 in Making Sustainability Work Ballou, B., Heitger, D. L., Landes, C. E., Adams, M. (2006). The Future of Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 202(6), 70-74. 14 Chapter 10 in Making Sustainability Work Discussion Board (25 pts) Mastery Exercise (0 pts) Discussion Board (25 pts) Portfolio Assignment (350 pts) Assignment Details This course includes the following assignments/projects: Week 1 Critical Thinking: Sustainability (60 Points) Using Table 1.1, "The nine principles of sustainability performance," write a one- to two-page analysis of WalMart in regard to these nine principles. Portfolio Milestone: Review the portfolio requirements (PDF) and portfolio rubric (PDF), and select your organization to use for the portfolio project. Give your instructor a brief history of the organization you chose to make sure it is acceptable for the project. Submit your proposal to your instructor through the Assignment section. Week 2 Portfolio Milestone: Begin the outline of your paper, what topics you may include, and how you will structure the paper. You can begin writing the first sections of the paper based on the first two modules of the course. Week 4 Critical Thinking: Costing Systems (60 Points) Chapter 4 of your textbook explains the various options of costing systems. In a one- to two-page document compare and contrast these costing systems and identify advantages and disadvantages of each. Type your analysis in Word and then share your answer with your small group by posting your answer in the Communications > Groups Pages discussion board. Collaborate with the other two students in your group to evaluate their answers and create consensus on one group answer to the problem. Copy the group answer into your Word document and add a paragraph that discusses your group answer, and any differences of opinion in the group as to what the answer should be. Individually submit your final Word document to the Assignments Dropbox. Week 8 Critical Thinking: Dell Analysis (60 Points) Chapter 7 of your text lists some examples of performance measures. Using Dell Computer Corporation as your company of focus, which of these performance metrics would be relevant? Why? Type your analysis in Word and then submit your final Word document to the Assignment Dropbox. Additionally, post your paper to the Discussion Board for this Module and reply to two other learners’ postings adding content and research that either supports or contradicts their report. Remember to use proper etiquette in your postings and remain professional at all times. Week 10 Critical Thinking: Performance Metrics: Annotated Bibliography and Analysis (60 Points) Begin by reviewing the Module 6 lecture on developing an annotated bibliography through the structure of a research system. For this assignment, you will develop an annotated bibliography that provides performance metrics for any of the corporations mentioned in case studies in your textbook. The cases are listed on p. 8 of Making Sustainability Work (Epstein, 2008). Using the Virtual Library, begin your research by locating professional peer-reviewed journals and select current research articles published within the last five years that address performance metrics as specified above. Create an annotated bibliography from your research with a minimum of eight well-written APA-formatted entries. For each entry, please also include the key word(s) that you used, as well as the database(s) in which you found your peer-reviewed articles within the Virtual Library. Using the articles in the bibliography, as well as any other relevant information you’ve learned in the course, develop a one-page paper that addresses the following question: How might the implementation of a standardized assessment of a company’s performance drive growth and productivity? Your well-written paper must meet the following requirements: Use academic writing style, clear and concise language, and well-constructed paragraphs (minimum of three sentences required to develop a paragraph) Include the annotated bibliography following the body of the paper 400-600 words in length Create a personal Journal of Relevant Research Studies for your academic files using these research articles. Add to your Journal in this course and subsequent classes to develop a rich collection of academic resources. Your Journal is not to be submitted for this assignment; it is yours to create and develop. Week 12 Critical Thinking: External Auditing (60 Points) Chapter 9 in the text discusses external companies conducting sustainability audits for corporations. Find an external auditing company on the Internet. In a 1-2 page document, discuss the services that company offers, along with any specific reports it provides. Submit your final Word document to the Assignments Dropbox. Portfolio Milestone: Work on your formatting and proofreading of your overall project this week, and put it into a nice, presentable, APA formatted document. If you are still adding content, you will want to complete that component as soon as possible. This is to be turned in by the end of next week. Week 14 Portfolio Assignment For this portfolio assignment, you will need to research a company of your choosing in regard to its corporate ethics and sustainability. This can be either a company you work for or a corporation such as those mentioned in the course materials. You will address each of the following topics as they relate to your company. Each of the 10 topics should be illuminated by sharing an example related to the organization, connected to a course concept or other credible sustainability theories and practices, and supported by credible and scholarly sources. The portfolio should be in the form of a 12-15 page formatted essay. The entire portfolio project is worth 35% of your overall grade for this course. Make sure to use research from credible and scholarly sources to back up your statements within the paper. You will need to address each of the following as they relate to your company. See the portfolio rubric for point values of each section. Sustainability Model A background and organizational framework for the corporation including relevant historical information, industry information, etc. A detailed explanation of how the company incorporates the four components of the Corporate Sustainability Model in their sustainability strategy. A detailed explanation of how the organization plans for capital budgeting and risk assessment. A detailed explanation of the social and environmental impacts of the activities and decisions of organization. A detailed explanation of this company’s reporting and disclosure of its sustainability measures, including any metrics used and audits performed. Leadership A detailed explanation of how the top leadership of the company has shown commitment to sustainability. A detailed explanation of how the corporate leaders involve the entire organization, outsourced agencies, and non-government organizations into their sustainability strategy. Stakeholders A detailed explanation of who the major stakeholders are for the company and their role as it pertains to the company. A detailed explanation of this company’s reputation amongst the public, the industry, and other stakeholders. Recommendations Your recommendations of how this company could improve upon its current sustainability strategy to improve its overall corporate performance. Course Policies Course Grading 20% Discussion Participation 45% Critical Thinking Activities 35% Final Portfolio Paper Grading Scale and Policies A 95.0 – 100 A- 90.0 – 94.9 B+ 86.7 – 89.9 B 83.3 – 86.6 B- 80.0 – 83.2 C+ 75.0 – 79.9 C 70.0 – 74.9 D 60.0 – 69.9 F 59.9 or below FN* Failure for Nonparticipation I** Incomplete