11 February

advertisement
6513
Minutes of the Open Section of the meeting of the Shire of Campaspe Council, held in the Echuca
Council Chamber, on 11 February 2003 commencing at 7.00pm.
PRESENT:
Councillors John Elborough, Neil Repacholi, Peter Williams, Murray McDonald, Greg Toll and Marion
Riley.
OFFICERS:
Phil Pearce, Jean Andrews, Ralph Kop, Phil Higgins
1.
APOLOGIES
Cathie Halliday
COUNCILLORS RILEY/ REPACHOLI
CARRIED
2.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
COUNCILLORS TOLL / MCDONALD
That Minutes of the Council Meeting held on 10 December 2002 be accepted as a true and
correct record.
CARRIED
3.
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
Nil
4.
PETITIONS
Nil
5.
INWARDS CORRESPONDENCE
Nil
6.
COUNCILLORS REPORT
Cr Williams
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
Reported on the following:

Planning application meeting 16/1/03

Heritage Advisory Committee Meeting 23/1/03

Australia Day ceremony Echuca 26/1/03

Hare Street Traders 29/1/03

Campaspe Cohuna Local Learning Employment Network meeting
29/1/03
11 February 2003
6514
Cr Repacholi
Cr McDonald
Cr Riley
Cr Toll
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section

Asset Management works 3/2/03

Echuca Art & Culture Advisory meeting 4/2/03

Library redevelopment 4/2/03

Echuca Moama Business Traders Association 5/2/03

Professor Xu future conference on rivers 5/2/03

Echuca Regional Health Board meeting 5/2/03

Southern 80 launch & presentations 7/2/03

Campaspe Stormwater meeting (VSAP) 10/2/03

Youth Strategy Workshop 11/2/03

Youth Strategy Steering Committee 11/2/03
Reported on the following:

CDMA Telephone Tower opening

Campaspe Economic Development Board meeting

Echuca Low Density Residential Land Review

Golden Cow meeting

Campaspe Cohuna Local Learning Employment Network meeting

Australia Day ceremonies

Echuca Industrial Land meeting

Drought meeting, Koyuga

Graham Road Dust Suppression meeting

Environmental Rebate meeting
Reported on the following:

Review Environmental Rebate Policy

Rochester Hall Committee meeting

Mt Scobie Transfer Station - trial plastic wrap machine

Australia Day

Residents meeting, Campaspe St, Rochester
Reported on the following:

150th Victoria Police celebrations 8/1/03

Australia Day – Colbinabbin, Toolleen, Rushworth
Reported on the following:

Lockington with Ralph Kop re: crossing repair 30/1/03

Council Assets meeting 3/2/03

Greenhouse Gases meeting, Bendigo 5/2/03

Campaspe Stormwater Meeting (VSAP) Rochester 10/2/03

Gunbower Citizens Advisory Group 11/2/03
11 February 2003
6515
Cr Elborough
7.
Reported on the following:

Water Stand Pipe, Rushworth Goulburn Valley Water

Australia Day Ceremonies

Second Bridge Crossing media release

Skate Park meeting, Rochester

Social Drought Taskforce meeting, Melbourne

Northern Oval Recreation Committee Management meeting

Met delegation from Echuca Netball Association
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the above Chief Executive Officers and Councillors Reports be received and noted.
COUNCILLORS WILLIAMS / TOLL
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
8.
MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT
8.1
Adoption of Internal Audit Committee Meeting Minutes (P Higgins, General Manager
Corporate Services)
1.
Purpose
To adopt the Internal Audit Committee Meeting minutes of the meeting held on 12
December 2002.
2.
Background
The Audit Committee meeting was attended by Committee members, Clive Pilley, Alana
Brennan, Alan Darbyshire, Cr Marion Riley, and guest Gavan Waters.
Issues discussed at the meeting were:



Review of Internal Audit Reports
Review of Quarterly Performance Statement
Amendment of Audit Plan until June 2003
Refer to Confidential Attachment 8.1 for copy of the Minutes.
3.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
Provides representation, advocacy and effective
decision making, being accountable to the community.
11 February 2003
6516
Financial:
Nil financial cost, however the Internal Audit Committee
facilitates the ongoing need to have an Internal Audit
function and Audit Committees to assist Council in
reaching a best practice level.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
Develop and maintain effective management systems
which are adaptable to the changing demands of the
modern work environment and enhance balanced
decision-making.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Minutes of the Internal Audit Committee meeting held on 12 December 2002, be
adopted by Council.
COUNCILLORS RILEY/ WILLIAMS
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
8.2
Budget Review (P Higgins, General Manager Corporate Services)
1.
Purpose
To receive and note the budget review of the Council to 31 December, 2002.
2.
Background
The quarterly performance statement to December, 2002, has been issued and it details
an improvement in the expected budget outcome, as follows:
Original Budget
September
Review
November
Review
December
Review
Variance since
November
review
$400,000 Deficit
$399,666 Deficit
$303,923 Deficit
$291,964 Deficit
$11,959 (F)
The quarterly performance statement highlighted various areas that require continued
monitoring due to drought conditions as well as several areas showing a favourable
position.
In addition there have been some additional major capital projects that will require funding
within the foreseeable future including land development, saleyards and economic
development.
3.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes -
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
The statement is to be presented to the internal
Audit Committee at its next meeting and this
gives the document a wider community focus, in
11 February 2003
6517
addition to the wide community consultation that
occurs with the original budget.
Financial -
The variation to the budget is detailed above and
represents an improvement on the original
budget.
Service Delivery -
No impact, as any alterations to the budget are
made based on at least maintaining the existing
level of service.
Organisational Development -
Input from CMT and various Managers have
been obtained on this document
RECOMMENDATION
That the quarterly performance statement to December 2002: 
be received and noted;

that the number and magnitude of the identified unfunded major projects be
recognised;

that Council continue to monitor the budget and look for savings that can be
channelled into these projects at a future budget review or years end, when the
actual financial result is clearer; and

ensure that there is adequate capacity within our budget to cater for a change in
climatic conditions.
COUNCILLORS RILEY / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
9.
COMMUNITY SUPPORT
9.1
Fundraiser Ticket Price Policy, The Paramount (Irene Pagram, Arts and Culture Officer)
1.
Purpose
To receive and ratify the policy: Paramount Fundraising Ticket price (Attachment 9.1)
2.
Background
This policy has been derived from recommendations from the previous
report to Council
3.
Content
The policy contains all the recommendations
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6518
4.
Issues
Nil
5.
Options
Nil
6.
7.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Provides equity of opportunity to all groups
Financial:
Negligible, bulk discount offset by increased ticket sales
Service Delivery:
Provides a transparent policy to the community
Organisational Development:
N/A
Consultation
Councillors, C.E.O., General Manager C & C, Team Leader C D., A & C Officer
8.
Officer Comment
Nil
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and Ratify the Policy: Paramount Fundraising Ticket Price.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / WILLIAMS
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
9.2
Ticket Price Reduction Policy, The Paramount (Irene Pagram, Arts and Culture Officer)
1.
Purpose
To receive and ratify the policy: Paramount Ticket Price Reduction (Attachment 9.2)
2.
Background
3.
This policy has been derived from recommendations from the previous report to Council
Content
The policy contains all the recommendations
4.
Issues
Nil
5.
Options
Nil
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6519
6.
7.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Provides equity of opportunity to all groups
Financial:
Negligible, reduction in price offset by increased
patronage
Service Delivery:
Provides a transparent policy to the community
Organisational Development:
N/A
Consultation
Councillors, C.E.O., General Manager C & C, Team Leader C D., A & C Officer
8.
Officer Comment
Nil
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and Ratify the Policy: Paramount Ticket Price Reduction.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / WILLIAMS
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.
ENVIRONMENT & AMENITY
10.1
Planning Permits Issued Under Delegated Authority (K Baker, Planning Assistant)
A)
Planning Applications Determined Under Delegated Authority: November 2002
Application
Number
Applicant
Property
Proposal
82-2001-473
Mark
Langenbacher
(Haydon)
Bangerang Road,
Echuca
Use and development of 27/11/2002
the land for a dwelling
82-2002-019
Paul and
Andrea Bacon
Toolleen Angle
Road, Muskery
Use and development of the
land for a caretakers
dwelling less than 20
metres from a road
25/11/2002
82-2002-181
Treston Gas
64 Albion Street,
Kyabram
Use and development of the
land by the installation of a
utility (LPG gas)
18/11/2002
82-2002-220
Cornelia Creek
Community
Surface
Old Deakin Drain
5P
Use and development of the
land for a community
08/11/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
Date
Issued
11 February 2003
6520
Drainage
Scheme
surface drain
82-2002-235
Shire of
Campaspe
Campaspe
Esplanade from
Anstruther Street
footbridge to corner
of Homan Street,
Echuca
Development of the land for
informal outdoor recreation
(path)
20/11/2002
82-2002-339
Lliart Pastoral
Company Pty
Ltd
492 O’Donnell
Road, Rochester
Development of the land by
the construction of a dairy
and effluent ponds
25/11/2002
82-2002-341
Gerard
Brandrick
Architects Pty
Ltd (Giorgianni)
527-529 High
Street, Echuca
Development of the land by
the installation of street
furniture (bollards and chain
to define outdoor eating
area)
21/11/2002
82-2002-382
Filkel Pty Ltd
16 Darling Street,
Echuca
Use and development of the
land for two dwellings
14/11/2002
82-2002-429
Land
Management
Surveys (Breen)
Bolithos Road,
Kyabram
Subdivision of the land into
three lots
01/11/2002
82-2002-441
Mark
Langenbacher
(Doidge)
7 Sawyers Ave,
Kyabram
Subdivision of the land into
five lots
06/11/2002
82-2002-445
Stephen
Kennedy
66-70 Murray
Esplanade, Echuca
Signage
13/11/2002
82-2002-463
Scott and
Louise Lothian
18 Haslam Street,
Kyabram
Development of the land by
the construction of an
extension to the existing
dwelling
07/11/2002
82-2002-470
Neil and Kristine
Thomas
377 Mary Ann
Road, Echuca
Use and development of the
land for a museum and
brewery
05/11/2002
82-2002-474
GR and PA
Carey
3490 Praire
Rochester Road,
Tennyson
Development of the land by
the construction of three
eco shelters
01/11/2002
82-2002-475
Alan Davies
11 Moora Road,
Rushworth
Development of the land by
the painting of the fire
station
06/11/2002
82-2002-508
Eddie
Kempinski
Cnr O’Keefe and
Rogers Street,
Development of the land by
the construction of two
21/11/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6521
Kyabram
dwellings
82-2002-509
Christine
Chandler
12 Phillips Street,
Rushworth
External repainting of
dwelling
05/11/2002
82-2002-513
John Lambden
3 Moora Road,
Rushworth
Use and development of the
land for a caretakers
dwelling
04/11/2002
82-2002-515
Malcolm and
Alison Dunstan
757 Day Road,
Tongala
Development of the land by
construction of two
outbuildings
07/11/2002
82-2002-518
Vesna Designs
Harrimans Road,
Waranga
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
01/11/2002
82-2002-524
Duncan and
Kate Worsfold
1088 Graham
Road, Tongala
Development of the land by
the construction of dwelling
additions
04/11/2002
82-2002-525
Ron and Judy
Kay
274 O’Donnell
Road, Rochester
Subdivision of the land into
two lots
06/11/2002
82-2002-527
TJ and PD Nulty
529 High Street,
Echuca
Erection of advertising
signage
05/11/2002
82-2002-532
Amelia Smith
7 Watson Street,
Tongala
Development of the land by
the erection of a dwelling
02/12/2002
82-2002-533
Barrie and
Caroline
Stenborg
Weppner Road,
Colbinabbin
Development of the land by
the construction of a shed
(garage)
07/11/2002
82-2002-537
Andrew
Medlicott
69 McMillan Road,
Echuca
Use of the land for a retail
premises (motor vehicle
sales)
04/11/2002
82-2002-544
D A Zanella
178 Simmie Road,
Echuca Village
Development of the land by
the construction of
extensions to the existing
dwelling
08/11/2002
82-2002-546
Gerard
Brandrick and
Associates
Murray Valley
Highway,
Wharparilla
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling and
outbuilding
14/11/2002
82-2002-547
Mark
Langenbacher
(Christie)
62 Dudley Street,
Rochester
Procedural Plan
01/11/2002
82-2002-552
Kenneth and
Barbara
Campbell
McEwen Road,
Tongala
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
29/11/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6522
82-2002-553
Dale Denham
(Welch)
1-11 Service Street,
Echuca
Use and development of the
land for a laundrette, retail
outlet and caretakers
dwelling
02/12/2002
82-2002-557
David and
Karen Howard
305 Allan Street,
Kyabram
Development of the land by
the construction of an
outbuilding (garage)
18/11/2002
82-2002-558
Dianne Apps
107 Latham Road,
Echuca
Development of the land by
the construction of
outbuildings to dwelling less
than 5 metres from
boundaries
20/11/2002
82-2002-559
Ashley French
Murphy Road,
Echuca
Use and development of the
land for a shed
08/11/2002
82-2002-561
Caroline and
James
Campbell
Cantwell Road,
Echuca
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
15/11/2002
82-2002-563
Mark
Langenbacher
(Main)
Cnr Whinfield Road
and Bamawm Hall
Road, Bamawm
Subdivision of the land into
two lots
27/11/2002
82-2002-567
Mark
Langenbacher
(Brereton)
Echuca West
School Road,
Echuca West
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
21/11/2002
82-2002-568
Mark
Langenabcher
(Brereton)
Echuca West
School Road,
Echuca West
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
21/11/2002
82-2002-577
Rob and Tracey
Caldow
243 Island Road,
Gunbower
Use and development of the
land for an inground
swimming pool
19/11/2002
82-2002-590
Robert and Kim
Day
60 Henderson
Road, Tongala
Use and development of the
land for a shed
29/11/2002
WFP-2002-046
Macroom Pty
Ltd
597 Echuca West
School Road,
Echuca West
Whole Farm Plan
19/11/2002
WFP-2002-078
T and Y Touhey
3232 Heathcote
Rochester Road,
Colbinabbin
Whole Farm Plan
15/11/2002
RECOMMENDATION:
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6523
That the planning applications determined and whole farm plans certified under
delegated authority be received and noted.
COUNCILLORS RILEY/ MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
B)
Planning Applications Determined Under Delegated Authority: December 2002
Application
Number
Applicant
Property
Proposal
Date
Issued
82-2001-610
Patho Piggery
Investments Pty
Ltd
Patho Station
Road, Patho
Development of the land by
the construction of an
extension to the existing
intensive animal husbandry
facility
10/12/2002
82-2002-304
Mark
Langenbacher
(McCarthy)
140 Bowen
Street, Echuca
Development of the land by
the construction of five
dwellings
18/12/2002
82-2002-411
Brian Harland
(Edwards)
42-44 Ogilvie
Ave, Echuca
Staged subdivision of the
land into 11 lots with
common property and
removal of part Reserve
No.1
03/12/2002
82-2002-417
Bonlac Foods Ltd
GirgarreRushworth Road,
Stanhope
Removal of Native
Vegetation
10/12/2002
82-2002-489
Leanne and
Cameron
McMullan
568 High Street,
Echuca
On premises liquor license
20/12/2002
82-2002-496
Beca Simons
(Coliban)
Campaspe Street,
Rochester
Use and development of the
land for a Utility Installation
(upgrade existing water
treatment and storage
system), the removal of
native vegetation and
associated works
16/12/2002
82-2002-530
Michael Monahan
(Bru-Lee Pty Ltd)
215 Service
Street, Echuca
Development of the land for
two dwellings and
subdivision of the land into
two lots
03/12/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6524
82-2002-539
James McLaurin
(Bickley)
5130 HeathcoteRochester Road,
Rochester
Re-subdivision of the land
into two lots
13/12/2002
82-2002-540
John Lock
252 Hare Street,
Echuca
On-premises Liquor License
02/12/2002
82-2002-543
Geoffrey and
Tanya Haw
2242 Finlay Road,
Tongala
Use and development of the
land for re-location of a
dwelling and erection of an
outbuilding
12/12/2002
82-2002-565
Wayne Rickard –
Wesfarmers
Landmark
53-61 Ogilvie
Ave, Echuca
Erection of an internally
illuminated advertising sign
05/12/2002
82-2002-571
Jerome Whitcroft
47 Haverfield
Street, Echuca
Development of the land by
the construction of
alterations to the existing
retail façade and garage
16/12/2002
82-2002-574
Brian Harland
(Maxwell)
Graham Road,
Kyabram
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling
12/12/2002
82-2002-578
Deborah Dunn
1950 Matheson
Road, Tongala
Development of the land by
the construction of
extensions to the existing
dwelling
12/12/2002
82-2002-581
Earth Tech
(Wyatt)
Waranga Basin
Road, Rushworth
Subdivision of the land into
two lots
20/12/2002
82-2002-582
Earth Tech
(Brentnall)
998 Hansen
Road, Bamawm
Re-alignment of boundaries
16/12/2002
82-2002-586
Land
Management
Surveys
(Anderson and
Cricelli)
58 Fischer Street,
and 34 Munro
Cres., Kyabram
Re-subdivision of the land
into two lots
12/12/2002
82-2002-587
Graham Hodgson
22 Hare Street,
Echuca
Use of the land for a
medical centre and erection
of a business identification
sign
18/12/2002
82-2002-588
Gerard Brandrick
and Associates
252 Hare Street,
Echuca (former
Post Office)
Development of the land by
the display of signage
19/12/2002
82-2002-592
Noel Hindson
251 Fenaughty
Street, Kyabram
Use and development of the
land for a storage shed
16/12/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6525
82-2002-595
Ken and Heather
Wells
606-608 High
Street, Echuca
Signage
18/12/2002
82-2002-596
Russell Day
183 Hare Street,
Echuca
Development of the land by
the construction of a
doorway entrance
09/12/2002
82-2002-601
Rodney Gailey
116 Bamawm
Road, Bamawm
Development of the land by
construction of a shed for
domestic and farm storage
04/12/2002
82-2002-602
Bob Ferguson
Cooma Road,
Kyabram
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling and
outbuilding
18/12/2002
82-2002-605
Metro Signs Pty
Ltd
239-249 Hare
Street, Echuca
Display of an internally
illuminated sign
(replacement sign)
09/12/2002
82-2002-608
Mark and Gail
McDougal
32 Murray Drive,
Wharparilla
Use and development of the
land for a dwelling and a
shed
12/12/2002
82-2002-609
Metro Signs
37-45 Heygarth
Street, Echuca
Display of an internally
illuminated sign
(replacement sign)
11/12/2002
82-2002-611
Amanda Block
264 Hare Street,
Echuca
External painting of existing
building and display of
signage
19/12/2002
82-2002-617
Ashley Dobell
Belt Road,
Runnymeade
Use and development of the
land for a second dwelling
(share farmers residence)
23/12/2002
82-2002-619
R Lewis
5 Morton Street,
Rochester
Development of the land by
the construction of an
extension to the existing
dwelling
20/12/2002
82-2002-622
Dale Denham
(Genio)
27 Park Street,
Kyabram
Development of the land by
the construction of an
extension to the existing
dwelling
18/12/2002
82-2002-625
Russell Sage
17 McMillan
Road, Echuca
Development of the land for
a freestanding carport
23/12/2002
WFP-2002-068
Bonlac Food Ltd
Girgarre
Rushworth Road,
Stanhope
Whole Farm Plan
10/12/2002
WFP-2002-079
Andrew Hipwell
McColl Road,
Whole Farm Plan
11/12/2002
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6526
Girgarre
WFP-2002-082
Neil Eichentopf
149 Alfred Road,
Wyuna
Whole Farm Plan
11/12/2002
WFP-2002-086
BW and CW
Toohill
65 Agnes Road,
Wyuna
Whole Farm Plan
11/12/2002
WFP-2002-089
D and J Larcombe
594 Looker Road,
Echuca
Whole Farm Plan
23/12/2002
Recommendation:
That the Planning Applications determined and Whole Farm Plans certified under
delegated authority be received and noted.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.2
Seed Collection from roadsides within the Shire (L. Anderson, Environmental Officer)
1.
Purpose
To standardise requirements for persons wishing to collect native vegetation seed from
roadsides within the Shire of Campaspe, and to ensure Council’s register of roadside
seed collector requests and permits is current and complete.
2.
Background
Council is deemed responsible for the control and management of all trees, saplings,
shrubs, underwood and timber on roadsides; as set out in The Forests Act (1958).
Individuals and organisations wishing to collect native vegetation seed from roadsides
within the Shire are therefore required to seek Councils permission prior to undertaking
any seed collecting on roadsides. NRE require collectors to have written consent from
Council in order to obtain a seed collection permit which allows roadside seed collection.
Works to be undertaken on roadsides within the Shire are subject to Local Law Number 3
– Roads, streets and public places. The purpose of the local law is to ensure both public
safety and amenity through management of Council’s roads and public places.
Furthermore the Shire’s Roadside Management Plan (2000) outlines actions and
timelines to guide council in achieving sustainable management of roadsides.
3.
Issues
Compliance with Local Law No 3
To date, individuals seeking permission to collect seed from roadsides have not been
made aware of the requirement to comply with the Local Law.
Register of collectors and record of collection sites
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6527
There is no up-to-date register of collectors who currently have permission to collect seed
from roadsides. Currently requests for permission and letters of permission to collect seed
from roadsides have been filed inconsistently. Thus there is no way of easily identifying
who has permission to collect seed, or locations from which seed has been collected.
4.
Options
Compliance with Local Law No 3
All collectors who currently have permission to collect seed from Shire roadsides will be
contacted to bring this requirement to their attention. All current collectors will be informed
they are required to comply with the following in order to retain their permission:
a) Permit conditions will include: a high visibility vest shall be worn by each individual
carrying out an activity on the roadside and the work site to be appropriately sign
posted. All persons carrying out an activity under the permit must be covered by a
public liability insurance policy of $10 million.
b) The fee for this permit will be NIL for non-profit seed collectors.
c) Permits for roadside seed collection will be valid for a maximum of 3 months.
Register of collectors and record of collection sites
It is proposed a new subject index titled Roadside Management Plan be created under
Environment, all seed collection requests and permission letters will be filed under this
subject. Seed collectors will also be requested to inform Council of areas they have
collected seed from to enable monitoring of areas collected. This will help ensure
particular areas are not over collected, and will assist in developing a rotational collection
system as proposed in the Roadside Management Plan.
5.
Balancing the Focus
Corporate Plan 2002-2005
Community Outcomes
Provide proactive leadership to the community in
protecting the environment.
Protect and provide a sustainable environment through
appropriate local laws.
6.
Financial
No impact
Service Delivery
No impact
Organisational Development
No impact
Consultation
The community seed bank was contacted to ascertain their position on proposed
changes, although they were not currently aware of the need for a works permit they saw
no problems with compliance.
Current private collectors approached did not see a problem with the requirement for a
works permit providing it was valid for a few months.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6528
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the above as standard for native vegetation seed collection on
roadsides within the Shire.
COUNCILLORS TOLL/ WILLIAMS
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.3
Bag Yourself a Better Environment Month, March 2003 (L. Anderson, Environmental Officer)
1.
Purpose
To seek Council endorsement for a Clean Up Australia Day “Bag Yourself a Better
Environment” program to be promoted shirewide.
2.
Background
The issue of reducing our use of plastic bags is not one with a short-term solution.
Currently, less than one per cent of the six billion plastic bags used in Australia are being
re-used and only ten per cent of households take their plastic bags to a central collection
point, other than a dump, for recycling.
Bag Yourself a Better Environment Month (BYBE) is a national month of action that
commences following the National Clean-up Australia Day in March. The Bag Yourself a
Better Environment program encourages shoppers and retailers to take action and
participate in their local area by finding ways to reduce, reuse, recycle and replace plastic
bags.
The objectives of the program are to:
1. Raise consumer awareness on alternatives to plastic shopping bags
2. Raise consumers and retailers awareness of the environmental, economical and
social impacts of plastic bag use and associated waste management and recycling
issues
3. Inspire and facilitate consumer and retailer action to use alternative shopping bags
and refuse, reduce, reuse and recycle plastic bags through a National month of
action
4. Reduce the quantity of plastic bags going to landfill and polluting our waterways,
beaches, coasts, roads, parks and bushland
Over 1000 Coles and Woolworths stores around the country have previously participated
in the campaign, as well as Australian Geographic stores and Calstores convenience
stores (Caltex) nationally, and a huge range of other retailers from small supermarkets,
newsagents and chemists to general stores.
The program seeks support from the community, including Councils, to become
ambassadors for the program. The role of ambassadors is to co-ordinate and encourage
participation in Bag Yourself a Better Environment month in their local area.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6529
3.
Issues
A co-ordinated approach to this national program will raise awareness of the issues
associated with the use of plastic bags, and thus have maximum impact on reducing the
volumes of bags used by customers across the Shire. The reduction in use of plastic bags
results in fewer bags in the general waste stream, which end up in either landfill or as litter
on our streets and in our waterways.
Local businesses that may be interested in participating may not participate due to a lack
of awareness of the program.
4.
Options
It is proposed the Shire of Campaspe, through the Environmental Officer, become
ambassadors for the BYBE program and co-ordinate the program across the Shire in
2003. This will involve promotion of the program and encouragement of participation to
retailers and consumers. Media releases and other promotional materials are available for
use from the national Clean Up office. It is proposed promotional activities to encourage
participation in the program will be run in Echuca, Kyabram, Tongala, Rushworth and
Rochester providing retailer support is gained.
5.
Balancing the Focus
Corporate Plan 1999 ~ 2002
Community Outcomes
Provide proactive leadership to the community in
protecting and enhancing the environment.
Protect and provide a sustainable environment through
appropriate initiatives.
6.
Financial
No impact
Service Delivery
No impact
Organisational Development
No impact
Consultation
The Clean Up Australia Day campaign is a national program endorsed by all tiers of
Government and in this respect consultation is not required. Individual retailers will be
approached as the program is undertaken, their participation will be voluntary.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council endorse the national Bag Yourself a Better Environment program, and coordinate a Shire wide promotional program for March 2003.
COUNCILLORS WILLIAMS / MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6530
10.4
Signing and Sealing of a Section 173 Agreement (Suzy Thomas, Land Use Planner)
82-2002-582
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s approval to sign and seal a Section 173 Agreement in accordance with
Condition 5 of Planning Permit No. 82-2002-582.
2.
Background
2.1 On 16 December 2002, Council’s Delegate issued Planning Permit No. 82-2002-582
for a two-lot subdivision (re-subdivision) of land known as Part of Crown Allotment
33 (Vol. 9000 Fol. 737) and Crown Allotment 32, Section B, Parish of Bamawm,
commonly known as 998-1070 Hansen Road, Bamawm (refer to Attachment 10.4).
The approved lots consist of 1.765ha (Lot 1) and 62.68ha (Lot 2).
2.2 Condition 5 of the permit stated:
“5.
Agreement under Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987
The applicant must enter into an agreement under Section 173 of the Act with
the Responsible Authority to prohibit subdivision of Lot 2 on the proposed Plan
of Subdivision No. PS510974M. The agreement must be prepared and
registered on the Certificate of Title at full cost to the applicant”.
The condition stems from the provisions of Council’s Interim Agricultural Policy in the
Campaspe Planning Scheme.
2.3 Local policy A1 outlines that it is Council policy to restrict small lot subdivision of high
quality agricultural land, and local policy A2 outlines that it is Council policy to adopt
subdivision sizes which reflect farm viability. To ensure the land is not further
fragmented in the future, it is considered appropriate that the subdivision be
approved on the basis that no more than two lots are created from the land. To
ensure compliance with this, it is considered appropriate to require the applicant to
enter into an agreement under Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act to
prohibit further subdivision of the proposed Lot 2.
3.
Issues
3.1 The agreement is required as a condition of the above permit. Failure to comply with
all conditions of the permit will result in the approved subdivision not being issued
with a Statement of Compliance, and therefore not being able to be registered at the
Titles Office.
3.2 The agreement will be registered on the Certificate of Title and will be binding on all
future owners.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Proposed agreement supports Council’s strategic land
use policy.
Financial:
The owners of the land are required to bear all costs
associated with the preparation and lodging of the
agreement.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6531
5.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Consultation
Consultation with adjoining landowners is not required.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council sign and seal the Section 173 Agreement relating to land known as
proposed Lot 2 on PS510974M.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / TOLL
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.5
Signing and Sealing of a Section 173 Agreement (Suzy Thomas, Land Use Planner)
82-2000-324
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s approval to sign and seal a Section 173 Agreement in accordance with
Condition 5 of Planning Permit No. 82-2000-324.
2.
Background
2.1 On 22 September 2000, Council’s Delegate issued Planning Permit No. 82-2000324 for a two-lot subdivision of land known as Crown Allotment 16, Parish of
Millewa, commonly known as Northern Highway, Echuca (refer to Attachment 10.5).
The approved lots consist of 5.565ha (Lot 1) and 239.9ha (Lot 2).
2.2 Condition 5 of the permit stated:
“5.
Agreement under Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987
The developer must enter into an agreement under Section 173 of the Act with
the Responsible Authority that in the event of Lot 1 or Lot 2 being further
subdivided or developed for a dwelling along Spiers Road, that Spiers Road
must be constructed and sealed from the Northern Highway to the west side of
Lot 1 and/or to the entry of any further subdivided or developed Lot 2 along
Spiers Road. The developer must be responsible for the full cost of
construction and sealing”.
2.3 The condition is a requirement of Council’s Design Engineering Unit.
3.
Issues
3.1 The agreement is required as a condition of the above permit. Failure to comply with
all conditions of the permit will result in the approved subdivision not being issued
with a Statement of Compliance, and therefore not being able to be registered at the
Titles Office.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6532
3.2 The agreement will be registered on the Certificate of Title and will be binding on all
future owners.
4.
5.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Proposed agreement is consistent with Council’s
engineering requirements in relation to the construction
and sealing of roads.
Financial:
The owners of the land are required to bear all costs
associated with the preparation and lodging of the
agreement.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Consultation
Consultation with adjoining landowners is not required.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council sign and seal the Section 173 Agreement relating to land known as
proposed Lot 1 and Lot 2 on PS449359X.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.6 Direction by Council on the Sale of Land – property behind North Street Echuca –
(Ken Kidd, Administration Manager)
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s direction on the sale of land behind North Street, Echuca (attachment
10.6).
2.
Background
Council has received an offer from Mr Keith Rowan of 22 North Street Echuca to
purchase park land behind his property for the purpose of erecting a Granny Flat. For him
to comply with the requirements for erecting this building he needs to have 40 square
metres of private open space for each building.
The land behind this property contains sections that may be contaminated but as yet
Council are not aware of what sections these are. For Council to be able to identify these
sections, the EPA would have to be consulted and soil test conducted on the land. This
would be at considerable cost to Council and then Council would have to place a caveat
on this land stating that the land could never be built on.
If Council was to agree to the sale of this land to Mr Rowan, we would then be obliged to
offer other residents that have property backing onto the land, the sale of land behind
their premises.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6533
3.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
4.
Financial:
The offer of $3,000 has been made to Council.
Council would have to spend in the vicinity of $60,000 to
have this land tested by the EPA. Subdivision cost
would have to be met. Consolidation costs to be met.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Consultation
No Statutory requirements have been complied with at this time. No referral authorities
have been consulted.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council not proceed with the sale of the land.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.7
Direction by Council on the Sale of Land – property Fraser Street Rochester
(Ken Kidd, Administration Manager)
1.
Purpose
To advise Council and seek direction on an offer to purchase land in Rochester being lots
9 – 15, PS 31949, Fraser Street.
2.
Background
Brad Gibson from Rochester submitted an offer on the land in December. The parcel
consists of six (6) lots on one title. Five of the six lots are a declared flood zone and can’t
be developed, fenced or filled. The one remaining lot can be built on however,
considerable amounts of fill will need to be consolidated onto this lot before any
development can take place.
The valuers believe these lots are very well situated close to both the Rochester shopping
centre and the Campaspe River reserve and walking tracks (attachment 10.7a).
They also believe that if the blocks were to be exposed to the market demand could be
quite strong.
3.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
No impact
11 February 2003
6534
4.
Financial:
Mr Gibson has made an offer for the properties of
$26,000 total.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
Nil
Statutory Implications
A valuation has been received from Hann McKenzie for $42,500 (attachment 10.7b).
5.
Consultation
Nil at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council offer the land for sale through auction.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / MCDONALD
That item 10.7 be deferred
CARRIED
10.8
Town Planning Application 82-2002-347 (Andrew Cockerall, Senior Land Use Planner) 822002-347
Brian Harland made a presentation to Council prior to consideration of this item.
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s decision in relation to Planning Application No. 82-2002-347 for a 14
Lot subdivision.
2.
Applicant / Owner
The applicant is Mr. Brian Harland (Planright).
The owner is Mr. P.S. Ferrier
3.
Subject Land
The subject land is described as Crown Allotments 68, 69 and 70, Parish of Echuca
North, County of Rodney, commonly known as 652 Lady Augusta Road, Echuca. The
land also has frontage to Mary Ann Road and Benson Road (refer Attachment 10.8a).
The land is used as a fully operational irrigated dairy farm and includes an associated
dwelling and farm buildings.
4.
Zoning
The land is zoned Rural Living (RLZ) under the Campaspe Planning Scheme and is also
affected by a Salinity Management Overlay (SMO) and partially affected by a Land
Subject to Inundation Overlay (LSIO). The SMO is proposed to be deleted from the site as
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6535
part of Amendment C14 to the Campaspe Planning Scheme. Amendment C14 will also
result in the Floodway Overlay being applied to part of the east half of the site (along the
depressions).
The land to the north, east and south is zoned Rural Living and the land to the west is
zoned Rural. All adjoining land is affected by the SMO and partially affected by the LSIO.
The purpose of the Rural Living Zone is:
“To implement the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy
Framework, including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies.
To provide for residential use in a rural environment.
To encourage:
 An integrated approach to land management.
 Protection and creation of an effective rural infrastructure and land resource.
 Improvement of existing agricultural techniques.
 Protection of the bio-diversity of the area.
 Value adding to agricultural products at source.
 Promotion of economic development compatible with rural living activities.
 Development of new sustainable rural living enterprises.
To ensure that subdivision promotes effective land management practices and
infrastructure provision.”
The subdivision provisions of the zone are similar to that within the Rural Zone with the
exception of the minimum lot size, which is eight(8) hectares. The provisions state that “a
permit may be granted for smaller lots in any of the following circumstances:

The subdivision is the re-subdivision of existing lots. The number of lots must not be
increased and all lots must be at least 0.4 hectare.

The number of lots is no more than the number the land could be subdivided into in
accordance with a schedule to this zone. All lots must be at least 0.4 hectare. An
agreement under Section 173 of the Act must be entered into with the owner of each
lot created which ensures that the land may not be further subdivided so as to
increase the number of lots. The agreement must be registered on title.

The subdivision is by a public authority or utility service provider to create a lot for a
utility installation.”
The decision guidelines for the Rural Living Zone include such relevant considerations as:

“The capability of the land to accommodate the proposed use or development,
addressing site quality attributes including soil type, soil fertility, soil structure, soil
permeability, aspect, contour and drainage patterns.

How the use or development relates to rural land use, rural diversification and natural
resource management.

The maintenance of farm production and the impact on the local rural economy.

Whether the site is suitable for the use or development and the compatibility of the
proposal with adjoining and nearby land uses.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6536
5.

The farm size and the productive capacity of the site to sustain the rural enterprise
and whether the use or development will have an adverse impact on surrounding
land uses.

The need to prepare an integrated land management plan.

The impact on the existing and proposed rural infrastructure.

An assessment of industry requirements, growth expectations, staging of the
development and investment requirements.

The impact of the use or development on the existing and surrounding rural uses.”
Proposal
The application seeks approval to subdivide the land into 14 lots (refer to Attachment
10.8b). 13 lots would be located along the Mary Ann Road frontage (corner of Benson
Road) and would range in size from 4000sqm to 6160sqm. An area of common property
would extend along the east boundary of the small lots. The balance of the land would
form Lot 14 with an area of 111.9 hectares.
A raw water scheme is proposed to be included in the common property at the rear of the
small lots. The common property would be planted with trees. A land capability
assessment was submitted by the applicant following a request for further information.
The report concludes that the standard performance measures outlined in the AS/NZS
1547:2000 for land suitability for on-site effluent disposal are achievable.
6.
Strategic Relationship
Planning and Environment Act 1987
The relevant objectives from section 4 of the Act are detailed below:
“(1) The objectives of planning in Victoria are—
(a) to provide for the fair, orderly, economic and sustainable use, and development
of land;
(f) to facilitate development in accordance with the objectives set out in paragraphs
(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e);
(g) to balance the present and future interests of all Victorians.”
State Planning Policy Framework
The relevant policies in the State Planning Policy Framework are:

Protection of catchments, waterways and groundwater (Clause 15.01)

Rural living and rural residential development (Clause 16.03) – the objective of this
policy is to identify land suitable for rural living and rural residential development. The
policy states that “land should not be zoned for rural living or rural residential
development if it will encroach on high quality productive agricultural land or
adversely impact on waterways or other natural resources.”

Agriculture (Clause 17.05)
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6537

Water supply, sewerage and drainage (Clause 18.09) – the objective of this policy is:
“to plan for the provision of water supply, sewerage and drainage services that
efficiently and effectively meet State and community needs and protect the
environment.”
Local Planning Policy Framework
Municipal Strategic Statement:
The key issues affecting the Shire are Agriculture, Urban Development, Heritage,
Environment and Tourism. Reinforcing the Shire’s Planning Vision Statement are a
number of key objectives for the key issues. These objectives can be found at Clause
21.03, in particular within Urban development – residential: “potential growth areas around
existing urban areas must not be compromised by inappropriate development activity”.
Town Structure Plans:
The Echuca Town Structure Plan does not specifically identify land for rural living
purposes.
Local Policies
The relevant local policies are:

Agriculture: Interim Agriculture Policy – Clause 22.01 of Campaspe Planning
Scheme
Encouraging a limited amount of low density residential opportunities on land
previously zoned for this purpose.

Environment (Clause 22.02):
The Shire is to be proactive in the prevention of environmental problems and the
maintenance of bio-diversity. Development and use of land must be ecologically
sustainable.
The Report on Residential Land Capability and Agricultural Land Suitability in the Shire of
Campaspe (March 1998) prepared by the Centre for Land Protection Research identifies
the west part of land as within the land system – Treeless Alluvial Plain, mid alluvial plain
component (Koga). Within this classification, the land is generally suitable for irrigated
cropping, irrigated perennial pasture, irrigated perennial horticulture, irrigated tomatoes,
irrigated farm forestry, dryland olives and dryland viticulture. In addition, the area has a
generally high capability for septic tanks. The land therefore presents a range of
opportunities for sustainable rural living enterprises.
7.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
The proposal, if approved, will result in the creation of
am enclave of low density residential lots within an area
identified for rural living development and currently used
for intensive dairying activities. The proposal, if
approved, would provide additional low density
residential lots.
Financial:
Potential increase in road maintenance costs.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6538
Organisational Development:
8.
No impact
Advertising / Referrals
The application was advertised to surrounding property owners in accordance with section
52(1)(a) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
The application was referred to the following authorities under section 55 of the Planning
and Environment Act 1987:

Powercor Australia Ltd - consent subject to standard conditions regarding servicing

Coliban Region Water Authority – consent to subdivision without reticulated water
and sewerage requirements

Telstra – consent subject to standard condition regarding the formal subdivision plan

Department of Natural Resources and Environment – no response received

Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority – no objection to application with
regard to floodplain issues as all the lots to be created contain appropriate building
envelopes
The application was referred internally to the following Council Departments:
9.

Engineering Design Services – consent subject to a number of conditions

Environmental Health – following a review of the Land Capability Assessment
prepared by B M Consulting Civil Engineers Pty Ltd, no objection was given to the
subdivision subject to five conditions regarding waste water treatment and disposal
Submissions
In addition to the referral authority responses detailed above, one additional submission
was received in the form of an objection to the application from K & J Murphy of 209
Benson Road, Echuca. A copy of the objection is included in Attachment 10.8c and is
summarised as follows:

The subdivision is against orderly development of rural residential land for Echuca

A decision on the application should not be made until the study currently being
undertaken by RPD Group on residential land is completed.

The subdivision would result in additional traffic in Mary Ann Road, which is
inadequate for current traffic use, in particular the intersection of Mary Ann Road and
Murray Valley Highway and the open speed limit.

Town water does not extend to the site.

School buses are already crowded

Increased dust and noise nuisance from traffic along Mary Ann and Benson Roads
A mediation meeting was not held as the recommendation by Council Officers is for
refusal of the application.
10. Discussion – Seeking the Balance
Council’s determination must be in the context of the current zoning for the land however
should also take into account any future strategic reviews. The land is zoned Rural Living
which has a minimum lot size of 8Ha. The basis of this application is not the minimum lot
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6539
size but the use of the averaging provisions of the zone that MAY allow the creation of
lots to 0.4Ha. To use the averaging provisions a strong argument must be developed and
not be taken as what the zone provisions allow. To take this basis to its logical extent, as
the landowner owns the surrounding 240Ha to the east and south, this would give rise to
the creation of another 44 rural residential sized blocks in an area with few services and
little strategic basis for their creation. If the land further south to Kelsh Road was in the
equation this would lead to a further 59 rural residential blocks. The averaging provisions
require a 173 agreement be entered into to prohibit the further development of the larger
lot. This would result in the further sterilisation of land from development that has not had
the benefit of sound planning.
Council has committed itself to a full strategic review of this area and two other areas
around Echuca for the provision of rural residential and rural living land. The RPD Group
have completed a draft of the review and indicate land to the south of Benson Road
(including this land) remains relatively undeveloped and provides an opportunity to rezone
this land to Rural to reflect the predominant use of the land for grazing. The current
proposal merely continues the strategically unsound decisions made by previous
Councils. The past decisions have mainly been in the area north of Benson Road where
the land has been significantly marginalised and the review proposes a strategic case for
its future management. Even in the context of the proposed zone (Rural) the proposal
could not be supported.
The proposal will result in a continuation of past (pre-amalgamation) practices to the
detriment of sound planning. The current review proposes a systematic management of
the land in an area that has not had the benefit of sound future planning. The proposal in
its current or proposed zone relies on the averaging provisions and fails to address the
decision criteria of the Rural Living zone, yet merely highlights the criteria it can meet
without a thorough review.
Council is faced with a decision that will determine the success or otherwise of the current
review conducted by the RPD Group. The draft plan proposes a logical course of land
management. The proposal is inconsistent with the intent of the current zone controls or
the intent of the draft review.
A further concern in relation to the subdivision relates to the creation of small lots, which
will abut an operating dairy farm, without any substantial buffer. This gives rise to the
potential for right to farm conflicts to arise in the future and in the long term could affect
the viability of the larger lot.
It is for the above reasons that the proposal cannot be supported.
RECOMMENDATION
That the application for subdivision of Crown Allotments 68, 69 and 70, Parish of Echuca North,
County of Rodney, commonly known as 652 Lady Augusta Road, Echuca into fourteen lots be
refused on the following grounds:
1. The application is inconsistent with the objectives of the Planning and Environment Act
1987, in particular objectives (a), (f) and (g) of section 4(1).
2. The application is inconsistent with the objectives and overall intent of the Rural Living
Zone.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6540
3. The subdivision would result in a rural residential enclave at the expense of sterilising the
larger block for further development.
4. Approval would further exacerbate inappropriate planning decisions made by previous
Councils.
MOTION
A Notice of Decision to Grant a Planning Permit be issued for the land described as
Crown Allotments 68 and 69 and Part Crown Allotment 70, Parish of Echuca North,
commonly known as 652 Lady Augusta Road, Echuca for a 14 Lot Subdivision, subject
to the following conditions:
1)
Plans
Use and layout of the site and the size of the proposed subdivision and works, as
shown on endorsed plans must not be altered or modified (whether or not to
comply with any statute, statutory rule or regulations or local law or for any other
reason), without written consent of the Responsible Authority.
2)
3)
Drainage
a)
Stormwater drainage must be in accordance with the requirements of the
Responsible Authority.
b)
The subdivider shall provide for the stormwater drainage in respect of each
and every lot on the plan of subdivision and all drainage works both within the
subdivision and to an approved point of discharge are to be constructed at full
cost to the subdivider and to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
c)
On-site detention of stormwater must be provided by the developer to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
Works on Plans
Before any works associated with the subdivision start, detailed construction plans
must be prepared to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. All works
constructed or carried out must be in accordance with those plans.
4)
Vehicle Crossings
A vehicular crossing shall be constructed to serve each lot created in accordance
with Responsible Authority specifications. Inspections are required prior to the
removal of any existing concrete and prior to the pouring of any new work.
5)
Engineering Supervision Fee
An Engineering Supervision fee of 3.25% of the estimated cost of works must be
paid prior to the issue of a Statement of Compliance to ensure that the roadwork
and drainage works are to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
6)
Road Construction
a)
Mary Ann Road is to be constructed and sealed from the north side of Benson
Road through to 75 metres south of Lot 13. The nominated width of the
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6541
bitumen seal is to be 6.4 metres with 2.4 metres shoulders and include
roadside drainage. The permit holder is responsible for the full cost of the
works.
b)
7)
Benson Road is to be constructed and sealed for 220 metres east of the Mary
Ann Road intersection and 20 metres west of the Mary Ann Road intersection.
The nominated width of the seal is to be 4 metres. The permit holder is
responsible for the full cost of the works.
Formal Plan
The applicant must forward final subdivision plans in accordance with Section 8 of
the Subdivision Act 1988.
8)
Agreement under Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987
The applicant must enter into an agreement under Section 173 of the Act with the
Responsible Authority to provide for the following:
a)
The land owners of Lots 1 to 13 agree not to complain about the continuation
of reasonable farming activities on Lot 14.
b)
Lots 1 to 14 shall not be further subdivided so as to increase the number of
lots.
All costs associated with the preparation and registration of this agreement are to
be borne by the permit holder.
9)
Water Supply
Lots 1 to 13 are to be supplied with reticulated water to the satisfaction of the
Responsible Authority and Coliban Region Water Authority.
10) Common Property
The common property to the rear of Lots 1 to 13 is to be landscaped and fenced to
the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority prior to the issue of a Statement of
Compliance. The fencing is to be of a standard that will prohibit domestic animals
from entering Lot 14.
11) Effluent Disposal
a)
b)
All household effluent is to be treated to a secondary standard in an
Environment Protection Authority (EPA) approved household sewerage
treatment plant.
Prior to the commencement of construction of any dwellings, an approval to
install a septic tank system must be obtained from Council.
12) Compliance
Prior to the Responsible Authority issuing a Statement of Compliance for the
subdivision, all planning conditions and all other requirements of the Responsible
Authority and the relevant referral authorities shall be completed or satisfactorily
provided for, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and the relevant
referral authorities.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6542
13) Time for starting and completion
This permit will expire if one of the following circumstances applies:
a)
The subdivision has not commenced within two years of the date of this
permit: or
b)
The subdivision has not been completed within five years from the date of
commencement.
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made
in writing before the permit expires or within three months afterwards.
14) Telstra
That the Plan of Subdivision submitted for certification be referred to Telstra or
other licensed telecommunications carrier, whichever is appropriate, in accordance
with Section 8 of the Subdivision Act, 1988.
15) Powercor
a)
The Plan of Subdivision submitted for certification under the Subdivision Act
1988 shall be referred to Powercor Australia Limited in accordance with the
Section 8 of the Act.
b)
The applicant shall provide an electricity supply to all lots in the subdivision in
accordance with Powercor’s requirements and standards (A payment to cover
the cost of such works will be required). In the event that a supply is not
provided the applicant shall provide a written undertaking to Powercor
Australia Limited that prospective purchasers will be so informed.
c)
The applicant shall where buildings or other installations exist on the land to
be subdivided and are connected to the electricity supply, they shall be
brought into compliance with the Supply and Installation Rules issued by the
Victorian Electricity Supply Industry.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / RILEY
That the motion be adopted.
CARRIED
10.9
Town Planning Application 82-2002-570 (Bev Davis, Town Planning Assistant) 82-2002-570
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s decision in relation to Planning Application No. 82-2002-570 for the
development of land by the construction of roadworks.
2.
Applicant / Owner
2.1 The applicant is the Shire of Campaspe, P O Box 35, Echuca 3564.
2.2 The owner is The Crown. The Shire of Campaspe is the responsible body for the
road.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6543
3.
Subject Land
3.1 Government Road Reserve, at and near the corner of Allan Street and Church Street,
Kyabram (see Attachment 10.9a).
3.2 Adjoining land uses are commercial premises along both streets.
4.
Zoning
4.1 The land is zoned Business 1 (Clause 34.01) under the Campaspe Planning
Scheme.
4.2 The land is also partly covered by a Land Subject to Inundation Overlay (Clause
44.04) under the Campaspe Planning Scheme.
4.3 Clause 44.04-1 states that a permit is required to construct a building or construct or
carry out works, including roadworks (LSIO).
5.
Proposal
5.1 An application has been received to construct a roundabout and adjacent footpath
infrastructure at the intersection of Allan Street and Church Street, Kyabram. The
works will include a sealed road, kerb and channel, footpath and signage (see
Attachment 10.9b).
5.2 The applicant has stated that the proposed roundabout forms part of the overall
Kyabram Streetscape Project, which includes extensive works in Allan Street and
surrounding area. It is anticipated that these works will improve traffic movement
and help promote the commercial shopping centre in Kyabram.
5.3 The streetscape renewal project commenced in 1999 when the local community
formed a Committee to raise funds for funding to have Allan Street re-designed and
attractively presented using a flora and fauna theme. A Rural Community
Infrastructure grant has been made available for this project with additional funds for
the development to date being provided by community donations, government
grants and Council.
The government grant will provide for the construction of Stage 1 of the streetscape
works and that grant has been matched by funds raised by the local community,
amounting to a total of $188,000, which will allow Stage 1 to proceed.
5.4 The project has now progressed, with plans being prepared in the year 2000, and
powerline relocation works carried out over the past three years, and to be
completed in the current financial year.
6.
Strategic Relationship
6.1 The following State Planning Policies are relevant to this application:

Protection of catchments, waterways and groundwater – Clause 15.01

Floodplain Management – Clause 15.02

Car parking and public transport access to development – Clause 18.02
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6544
6.2 The Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) outlines that Kyabram is a service centre
for its rural hinterland. The proposed development is not contrary to any of the
objectives outlined for Kyabram in the MSS.
6.3
7.
8.
The following Local Planning Policies are relevant to this application:

Clause 22.02 – Environment: Policy E2

Clause 22.06 - Commercial: Policy C1 identifies Kyabram as a key community
centre servicing surrounding districts.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
The works will enhance Allan Street, Kyabram and will
also allow for a more efficient movement of traffic.
Financial:
No impact
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Advertising / Referrals
8.1 The application was advertised pursuant to the following Sections of the Planning
and Environment Act 1987:
 S.52(1) (c) notices were sent to adjoining property owners as required by the
Campaspe Planning Scheme.
 S52(2): a notice was published in the Kyabram Free Press on 29 November,
2002
8.2 The application was referred to Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority
under Section 55 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
8.3 The application was referred to Council’s Design Engineers who had no objection to
proposal.
9.
Submissions
9.1 A total of five (5) submissions were received, four of which were objections.
The submissions can be summaries as follows:
 Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority – no objection based on the
nature and extent of the proposed works.
 M and C Foulsham, (PaintRight)– objection
 Jason Moon, (JLM Computers) – objection
 P D’Aulerio, (Polvere Kitchens) – objection
 E A Ross (Video Ezy) – objection
9.2 The grounds of objection are summarised as follows:
 Loss of carparking outside businesses and loss of carparking in immediate
vicinity
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6545
 Insufficient room to construct a roundabout
 Traffic travelling and turning in close proximity to shop frontages
 No room for outside advertising
 Displays outside shops would be affected by dust etc.
 Laneway access to shop on Allan Street will be blocked by roundabout
 Current small island in front of Paintright Store should be removed to allow for
more parking
 Increased congestion at intersection due to persons looking for a carpark or
double parking
9.3 The applicant has responded to the above objections in the following manner:
 Loss of carparking:
Loss of car parks will be offset by increased safety and improved functioning of
the intersection for both vehicles and pedestrians. The commercial centre of
Kyabram is well served by parking both in Allan Street, and with several car
parks at the rear of the main shopping precinct.
 Insufficient room for roundabout, traffic travelling and turning extremely close to
shop fronts and no room for outside advertising:
Engineering designs have been done which indicate a roundabout can be
suitably constructed at the intersection in the area available. The kerb line in front
of the objector’s business will remain in a similar position to the current kerb line.

Blocking of laneway access to shop on Allan Street:
Access to this laneway will be maintained
 Removal of current small island in front of Paintright Store:
The island is necessary to allow for safe pedestrian crossing of Allan Street..
 Increased congestion at intersection due to persons looking for a carpark or
double parking
Loss of carparking is marginal and with the number of car parks generally
available, both on-street and off-street, this is not likely to result in significant
changes to traffic flows.
9.4 A mediation meeting was held on 18 December, 2002 at which three objectors, Cr
Elborough and Mike Bruty, Council’s Infrastructure Manager, were present. No
objections were withdrawn as a result of this meeting.
10. Discussion – Seeking the Balance
10.1 Decision Guidelines: The key decision guidelines for consideration of this application
are stated in Clause 44.04-5 of the Land Subject to Inundation Overlay provisions,
and also Clause 65 of the planning scheme.
Clause 44.04-5 states that the responsible authority must consider:

Any comments from a relevant floodplain management authority.
Clause 65 states that before deciding on an application, the responsible authority
must consider, as appropriate, the following:
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6546
The State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework,
including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies, including:

The orderly planning of the area.

The effect on the amenity of the area.
10.2 It is considered that the proposal is not inconsistent with the above policies and
provisions.
10.3 It should be noted that the roundabout was proposed at this intersection for the
following reasons:

To allow for efficient movement of traffic through the intersection. Traffic counts
have indicated a high number of turning vehicles at the intersection from both
the eastern and western legs of Allan Street into Church Street, and also out of
Church Street into Allan Street. Delays and unsafe manoeuvres that result from
this situation have been evident in the past.

The intersection has an accident record and it is anticipated that the roundabout
will improve road safety by slowing down the traffic, particularly coming from a
westerly direction in Allan Street, where the speed limit is currently 40kms per
hour.

The roundabout includes the construction of splitter islands in each of the three
legs which will allow a safe haven for pedestrians who cross at the intersection.

It will allow for the most aesthetic development of the streetscape and will
provide an attractive entrance into the shopping centre.

Traffic lights have not been considered for this intersection as it is considered
that they would result in compulsory delays for vehicles at the intersection and
would not allow for the steady flow of traffic through the intersection. Traffic
lights would also be cost prohibitive and not attractive.

Various modified T intersections were considered for the site. However a
modified T intersection layout would not be suitable with the volume of turning
traffic being high, turning from each leg of the intersection.
10.4 The streetscape roundabout is a discretionary development under the Campaspe
Planning Scheme. The proposal has been assessed against the relevant provisions
of the Campaspe Planning Scheme and the issues raised in submissions. It is
considered that, subject to appropriate conditions, adverse impacts on the
community should be minimal.
RECOMMENDATION
That a Notice of Decision to Grant a Permit for the development of land by the
construction of roadworks on the road reserve at the intersection of Allan Street and
Church Street, Kyabram, be issued subject to the following conditions:
1. Layout Not Altered
The layout of the site and the size of the proposed works as shown on the endorsed
plans must not be altered without the written consent of the Responsible Authority.
2. Satisfactory Continuation
Once the development has started it must be continued and completed to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6547
3. Time for Starting and Completion
This permit will expire if one of the following circumstances applies:
 The development not started within two years of the date of this permit.
 The development is not completed within four years of the date of this permit.
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in
writing before the permit expires or within three months afterwards.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.10
Signing and sealing of Licence to Quarry and Take Materials – Weeks’ Pit, Toolleen (M Brown,
Executive Assistant Assets & Planning)
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s approval for the signing and sealing of a Licence to Quarry and Take
Materials, between Graham and Elizabeth Weeks and Council.
2.
Background
The Quarry Manager has been looking to legalise former Shire of Waranga gravel pits to
provide additional road making material.
Now the documentation has been received, Council can finalise the licence agreement.
3.
Content
This agreement will provide Council the sole right to dig, excavate and take away stone
and gravel from the land owned by Graham and Elizabeth Weeks and known as CA 24,
Parish of Toolleen.
The term of the agreement is for five years from the commencing date, with an option of a
further five year term, at an annual fee of $750 per annum. Royalties payable are .40
cents per cubic metre of materials as a finished product.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Corporate Plan 2001 ~ 2004
Community Outcomes
Provision of additional quarrying material which will be
available for Council projects.
Financial
$750 per annum annual fee, plus royalties payable at
.40 cents per cubic metre of materials as a finished
product.
Service Delivery
This will provide increased quarrying material for use.
Organisational Development
Nil impact.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6548
5.
Consultation
The Quarry Manager has consulted with the owner / licensor.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council sign and seal the Licence to Quarry and Take Materials between Graham and
Elizabeth Weeks and Council for land described as CA 24 Parish of Toolleen and
described in Certificate of Title Volume 8299 Folio 087.
COUNCILLORS RILEY / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.11
Planning Permit Application TPA 82-2002-572 (Andrew Cockerall, Senior Land Use Planner).
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s decision in relation to Planning Permit Application No. TPA 82-2002572 for the development of land for roadworks.
2.
Applicant / Owner
The applicant for the permit is the Shire of Campaspe.
The owner of the land is the Crown, with the Shire of Campaspe as Committee of
Management.
3.
Subject Land
The subject land is the road reserve in High Street, Rushworth from the Bendigo
Murchison Road (Moora Road) south to Hyde Street (adjacent to the Police Station)
4.
Zoning
The subject land is presently zoned Township pursuant to the Campaspe Planning
Scheme and is affected by the Heritage Overlay. The surrounding land is also zoned
Township with a Heritage Overlay.
5.
Proposal
5.1 The application proposes to approve the various streetscape works identified in the
High Street, Rushworth Heritage Management Plan. The plan was prepared by
Council’s Heritage Adviser, Mr. Andrew Ward in 1997 and was modified in 2000
(refer attachment 10.11).
5.2 The proposed works include various landscaping, street lighting, street furniture and
other infrastructure works that have been identified in the plan, which will ultimately
enhance what is already a very significant streetscape.
5.3 Approval is being sought for all the works identified in the plan, rather than applying
for multiple permits for the works. Given the extensive works to be undertaken, it is
recommended that any permit issued would be given a 10 year life rather than the
normal 2 years.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6549
6.
Strategic Relationship
6.1 State Planning Policy Framework
The following State Planning Policies need to be noted in relation to this application:
Clause 15.11 – Heritage
Clause 18.02 – Car parking and public transport access to development
Clause 18.09 – Water supply, sewerage and drainage
6.2 Local Planning Policy Framework
6.2.1 The Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) recognises that Rushworth has “a
small economic base focussed on tourism and essential services” and the
heritage is a key strategic issue for the Shire of Campaspe.
6.2.2 The strategic objective for heritage is as follows:
“The heritage assets of the Shire are recognised as being vital features of the
man made and natural environment and are irreplaceable records of our
cultural development. They are important for the continued economic, social
and cultural development of the community and must be protected and
maintained."
6.2.3 The Rushworth Town Structure Plan identifies that the High Street precinct as
being very significant. One of the strategic considerations for Rushworth is as
follows:
“Rushworth is distinguished by its unique pre 1914 streetscape and
landscape character (especially the High Street precinct). The former
planning controls outline this precinct as an “Area of Special Significance”.
These provisions controlled development so as to conserve and enhance the
historic value of the area. Heritage controls will continue to be applied. Any
development in central Rushworth must be sympathetic to the historic
character of the town, and the Rushworth High Street Management Plan”
6.2.4 The relevant Local planning policies to this application relate to Heritage
(Clause 22.04) and Commercial (Clause 22.06):
 Heritage strategies relevant to this application include: H1, H2, H3, H4,
H5, H6, H7 and H8.
 Commercial strategies relevant to this application include: C4
7.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
The proposal will enhance the existing significant
streetscape of Rushworth which will in turn have positive
impacts on tourism and community well being.
Financial:
Funding is available to commence the proposed works.
Service Delivery:
None
Organisational Development:
None
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6550
8.
Advertising / Referrals
8.1 Notice was given in under Section 52(1) of the Planning and Environment Act, 1987
by placing a notice in the Waranga News.
8.2 Council Officer advice was sought from Council’s Strategic Planner, the Heritage
Adviser, Heritage Advisory Committee and Design Engineers.
9.
Submissions
9.1 Two objections were received to the application from Mr. Ian Anderson (President of
the Shire Hall Committee) and Ms. Gillian Schoenborn on behalf of the Rushworth
Community House.
9.2 The grounds of objection can be summarised as follows:

Loss of car parking spaces in High Street

Concern that the use of Palm trees is not historically accurate
9.3 In response to these submissions the following comments are offered:
Car Parking
At an on-site meeting it became apparent that the concern for both parties was the
loss of an area informally being used as carparking in the median strip. This area is
identified in the Master Plan as being a landscaped area.
When there is a function at the Shire Hall and the Community House at the same
time, it is understood that car parking spaces are a premium. This can be addressed
in a number of ways. Firstly, the area proposed to be a landscaped median in front
of the Community House can incorporate car parking areas (similar to what has
occurred at the northern end of High Street). This will more than cater for the
demands of the Community House and will provide some parking for the Shire Hall
when the Community House is closed.
Other options for the provision of additional car parking include investigation of car
parking options in front of the Shire Hall land, although this may prove to be
impractical and any car parking that could be provided would be limited. At the onsite
meeting the potential for using some of the land at the rear of the Shire Hall, which
forms part of the Police Camp reserve was raised. While potential exists for the
provision of carparking on this land, it would be subject to further investigation with
the State Government.
Palm Trees
The issue of the palm trees was also discussed at the onsite meeting. The concern
of the objector was that the palms did not appear in a 1916 photo of the Rushworth
streetscape, and as such may not be historically accurate.
Despite this it is considered that the existing palms play an important role in the
streetscape of Rushworth and that the planting of further palm trees would
consolidate this.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6551
10. Discussion – Seeking the Balance
10.1 The application has be considered against the relevant clauses of the State Planning
Policy Framework and is considered to accord with the objectives of those clauses.
10.2 The Local Planning Policy Framework was discussed in paragraph 6.2. The proposal
is generally consistent with these provisions.
10.3 The proposal is supported by the purpose and decision guidelines of the Heritage
Overlay as it will enhance the already significant streetscape of Rushworth.
10.4 The concerns of the objectors were discussed in the report and can be addressed by
the appropriate use of planning permit conditions and investigations into further
carparking options in the locality.
RECOMMENDATION
(1) That a Notice of Decision to Grant a Planning Permit for the development of the High
Street, Rushworth road reserve between the Bendigo-Murchison Road and Hyde
Street for the purpose of Road works in accordance with the plans submittted,
subject to the following conditions:
1.
Amended Plans Required
Before the development starts, amended plans to the satisfaction of the
Responsible Authority must be submitted to and approved by the Responsible
Authority. When approved, the plans will be endorsed and will then form part
of the permit. The plans must be drawn to scale with dimensions and three
copies must be provided. The plans must be generally in accordance with the
plans submitted with the application or some other specified plans but
modified to show:

2.
The provision of additional 26 car parking spaces in the median strip in
the vicinity of the Community House at 67 High Street, Rushworth.
Layout Not Altered
The development as shown on endorsed plans must not be altered without the
written consent of the Responsible Authority.
3.
Car Park
Areas set aside for parked vehicles and access lanes as shown on the
endorsed plans must be:
a)
Constructed to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
b)
Properly formed to such levels that they can be used in accordance with
the plans.
c)
Surfaced with an all-weather sealcoat to the satisfaction of the
Responsible Authority.
d)
Drained and maintained to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
e)
line-marked to indicate each car space and all access lanes to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority .
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6552
f)
4.
Parking areas and access lanes must be kept available for these
purposes at all times.
Lighting
Outdoor lighting must be designed, baffled and located to the satisfaction of
the Responsible Authority to prevent any adverse effect on adjoining land.
5.
Landscaping Completion and Maintenance
Landscaping works as shown on the endorsed plans must be completed to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and then maintained to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
6.
Vegetation Retention
All existing vegetation shown on the endorsed plans must be suitably marked
before any development starts on the site and that vegetation must not be
removed, destroyed or lopped without the written consent of the Responsible
Authority.
7.
Satisfactory Continuation
Once the development has started it must be continued and completed to the
satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
8.
Heritage Requirements
Building materials and paint colours must be in accordance with the endorsed
plan and must be to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority in
consultation with the Heritage Adviser.
9.
Detailed Engineering Plans
Prior to the commencement of construction stages, three sets of detailed
engineering design plans shall be submitted for approval by the Responsible
Authority and upon approval by the Responsible Authority shall be endorsed
to form part of this permit.
10. Time for Starting and Completion
This permit will expire if one of the following circumstances applies:
 The development is not started within two years of the date of this permit.
 The development is not completed within ten years of the date of this
permit.
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is
made in writing before the permit expires or within three months afterwards.
(2) That the Shire of Campaspe investigate and undertake community consultation on
car parking in the High Street road reserve in the vicinity of the Shire Hall.
(3) That the Shire of Campaspe investigate and undertake community consultation on
car parking on the Policy Camp reserve at the rear of the Town Hall.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6553
COUNCILLORS RILEY / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
10.12
Planning Permit Application (Andrew Cockerall, Senior Land Use Planner) TPA 82-2002-469
Item 10.12 was withdrawn prior to commencement of the meeting
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s decision in relation to Planning Permit Application No. TPA 82-2002469 for the erection of building to be used as a shop and a waiver of the car parking
requirements
2.
Applicant / Owner
The applicant for the permit is Gerard Brandrick Architects.
The owner of the land is Rousalli Pty Ltd
3.
Subject Land
The subject land is known as 132 Hare Street, Echuca, although the part of the land
affected by this application fronts Nish Street, adjacent to Stubberfields accountants.
Refer attachment 10.12 for locality plan.
4.
Zoning
The subject land is zoned Business 1 in accordance with the Campaspe Planning
Scheme. No overlay controls affect the land.
The planning controls are not proposed to alter as part of Amendment C14 to the
Campaspe Planning Scheme, presently with the Minister for consideration.
5.
Proposal
The application proposes to erect a single storey extension to the rear of Bennett Sports,
which fronts Hare Street. The proposal would result in the business having frontage to
both Hare and Nish Streets.
The extension has an area of 357m2, 60m2 of which will be for storage purposes and the
remainder will be retail floor space. Only one(1) car park has been set aside for Bennetts
Sports.
The new building is to be erected over an area set aside for car parking as part of the
extension to Stubberfields, presently under construction which was approved as part of
TPA 82-2002-042.
A total of 14 car parking spaces will be lost as part of this application. The extension itself
requires the provision of additional 8 car parking spaces, a number of spaces will become
available on Nish Street however there will be a net loss of 17 car parking spaces.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6554
6.
Strategic Relationship
A permit is required in accordance with Clause 34.01-4 of the Campaspe Planning
Scheme, which states “a permit is required to construct a building or construct or carry out
works”. It should be noted that the use of the land as a “shop” does not require planning
approval. Planning approval is also required in accordance with Clause 52.06-1 of the
Scheme, which states “A permit may be granted to reduce or waive the number of car
spaces required by the table”.
The purpose of the Business 1 Zone is:

To implement the State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy
Framework, including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies.

To encourage the intensive development of business centres for retailing and other
complementary commercial, entertainment and community uses.
The purpose of the car parking provisions is to:

To ensure that car parking facilities are provided in accordance with:

The State Planning Policy Framework and the Local Planning Policy Framework
including the Municipal Strategic Statement and local planning policies.

Any parking precinct plan.

To provide the opportunity to use parking precinct plans in appropriate locations.

To promote the efficient use of car spaces through the consolidation of car parking
facilities.

To ensure the provision of an appropriate number of car spaces having regard to the
activities on the land and the nature of the locality.

To ensure that the design and location of car parking areas:

Does not adversely affect the amenity of the locality, in particular the amenity of
pedestrians and other road users.

Achieves a high standard of urban design.

Creates a safe environment for users, particularly at night.

Enables easy and efficient use.

Protects the role and function of nearby roads.

Facilitates the use of public transport and the movement and delivery of goods.
The relevant policies in the State Planning Policy Framework are: Activity Centres (Clause
17.01), Business (Clause 17.02) and Car parking and public transport access to
development (Clause 18.02).
The objective for Car parking and public transport access to development is:
“To ensure access is provided to developments in accordance with forecast demand
taking advantage of all available modes of transport and to minimise the impact on
existing transport networks and the amenity of surrounding areas.”
The key issues affecting the Shire are Agriculture, Urban Development, Heritage,
Environment and Tourism. Reinforcing the Shire’s Planning Vision Statement are a
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6555
number of key objectives for the key issues. These objectives can be found at Clause
21.03.
The Echuca Town Structure Plan identifies the Heritage areas and the key commercial
centre. The subject site is within the commercial centre. The Echuca town structure plan
also identifies a number of sites within the commercial centre that are capable of being
expanded. None of these sites are within reasonable walking distance of the subject land.
The relevant Local Policies are the Commercial Policies (Clause 22.06).
7.
8.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
The expansion to a retail facility without the provision of
additional car parking facilities within reasonable
walking distance, could lead to parking congestion in the
immediate area.
Financial:
The cost of the works will be borne by the developer.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Advertising / Referrals
The application was not required to be advertised in accordance with Section 52 of the
Planning and Environment Act, 1987 as the buildings and works are exempt from
advertising in accordance with Clause 34.01-4 of the Planning Scheme.
Internal comment was sought from Council’s Design Engineer.
9.
Submissions
Council’s Design Engineer offered no objection subject to conditions relating to drainage
and access.
10. Discussion – Seeking the Balance
The proposed development is generally consistent with the Business 1 Zone provisions of
the Planning Scheme. The main issue at hand is to do with car parking.
As stated above, the development will result in the loss of 14 car parking bays from the
extension to Stubberfields approved as part of 82-2002-042. The extension to Bennett’s
Sports Stores will create the need for an additional eight (8) car parking spaces. It should
be noted that these figures are based on the reduced figures from the Echuca Car
Parking Study and not the figures directly taken from the Planning Scheme, which would
be considerably higher.
On the ground the total car parking will be nine (9) spaces for the entire Stubberfields site
and one (1) space for Bennetts Sports. Whilst there is discretion for a partial waiver of the
car parking rates to be granted, the amount of car parking being provided is clearly
inadequate.
Before a requirement for car parking spaces is reduced or waived, Council must have
regard to issues such as:
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6556



The availability of car parking in the locality.
Local traffic management
Local amenity including pedestrian amenity.
In this instance, there is an all day public car park within reasonable walking distance
(approximately 330 metres) of the land. The nature of the surrounding land uses is such
that they generate reasonably high turnover of parking spaces in the locality. The nature
of the office use (Stubberfields) is such that it generates the need for all day parking for
staff. It should be noted that Stubberfields employ significantly higher numbers of staff
compared to Bennetts Sports.
An approach in the past for dealing with short falls in car parking, is for the relevant land
owner to voluntarily enter into a Section 173 Agreement with Council, to make a
contribution for car parking in the area. Contributions should reflect the purchase of land
and development of the land for car parking.
In this case there is already land available for car parking, although it is separated from
the subject land by 330 metres, so the cost is limited to the construction of the car parking
only. This has been calculated to cost approximately $3,700 per space (or $62,900 for
the 17 spaces). The appropriate mechanism for collecting this type of contribution is via
Parking Precinct Plans as incorporated documents in the planning scheme. In the
absence of these plans the only other mechanism is through voluntary Section 173
Agreement referred to above.
Council entered into discussions with the permit applicant regarding the voluntary
contribution. The initial advice that Council received was that the developer was not
willing to enter into such an agreement. Further discussions were then held with the
developer, however, this matter was unable to be resolved.
It should be noted that the planning scheme requires a permit applicant to provide
justification for a reduction in the car parking requirements. In this case no such
justification has been provided to Council.
It is considered that the car parking reduction being sought is excessive and that no
justification has been provided to Council in support of the request.
RECOMMENDATION
That a Refusal to Grant a Planning Permit for the development of the land at rear of 132
Hare Street, Echuca, commonly known as Lot 2 PS 448900N, Parish of Echuca North by
the erection of an extension to the rear of the building and a waiver of the car parking, be
issued subject to the following conditions:
1. Inadequate car parking has been provided to the development in accordance with
Clause 52.06 of the Campaspe Planning Scheme.
2. The reduction in car parking has not been justified in accordance with Clause 52.061.
3. The reduction in car parking may result in car parking congestion problems in the
locality.
Item 10.12 was withdrawn.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6557
10.13 Amendment to endorsed plan -Town Planning Permit 82-2002-528 (B Davis, Town Planning
Assistant)
Mr Johnson made a presentation to Council prior to consideration of this item.
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s decision in relation to the amendment of the endorsed plan to Planning
Permit 82-2002-528, for the use and development of land for the erection of a dwelling
and outbuilding, under Section 62(3) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
2.
Applicant / Owner
Damien Ginger, 5 John Court, Clonbinane, 3658.
3.
Subject Land
PC168149D, Parish of Waranga, Basin Court, Waranga, (it appears that Basin Court is
now known as Panorama Court), comprising 2.057 hectares. This lot is part of a 23 lot
rural residential subdivision of land approved by the former Shire of Waranga under the
Waranga Planning Scheme’s ‘Rural C’ Zone. The lot is situated approximately 500 metres
west of Waranga Basin. Site is L-shaped with frontage to both Basin Court and Waranga
Drive, and slopes down towards Basin Court. Native trees and shrubs are scattered over
the site see Attachment 10.13a).
The lot adjacent to the southern boundary of the subject land i.e. on the corner of Basin
Court and Waranga Drive, contains a dwelling, approximately 20 metres from the
boundary. The lot adjacent to the northern boundary also contains a dwelling.
Surrounding land uses are generally rural residential type living with some small farms.
A restrictive covenant affects the title to the land. The proposal does not contravene the
covenant.
4.
Zoning
4.1 Rural Living Zone (Clause 35.03-1) under the Campaspe Planning Scheme. The site
is also covered by a Salinity Management Overlay (Clause 44.02-1).
4.2 The surrounding land is also zoned Rural Living with a Salinity Management Overlay.
4.3 Clause 35.03-1 (Rural Living Zone) states that a permit is required for a dwelling on
an area of less than 8 hectares (Section 2 Use). Clause 35.03-3 states that a permit
is required to construct or carry out a building or works associated with a use in
Section 2 of Clause 35.03-1.
4.4 Clause 35.03-3 (Rural Living Zone) also states that a permit is required for an
outbuilding if it has dimensions greater than those specified in the Schedule to the
Zone. The Schedule to the Zone states that a permit is required for an outbuilding
greater than 200m2. The outbuilding proposed contains 72m2 so a permit is not
required for the outbuilding.
4.5 The Schedule to the Salinity Management Overlay states that a permit is not required
for any buildings less than 200 m2 in area. The Salinity Management Overlay is
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6558
proposed to be removed under the requirements of the proposed Amendment C14 to
the Campaspe Planning Scheme, presently in the process of being approved.
5.
Proposal
5.1 An application was received on 17th October 2002 for the erection of an
approximately 150m2 w/b dwelling and outbuilding. The proposal was to re-erect the
weatherboard single storey dwelling 19 metres from the southern boundary of the lot
(see Attachment 10.13b).
5.2 Planning permit 82-2002-528 was issued on 05 December 2002 for the erection of
the dwelling 77.6 metres from the road frontage and 19 metres from the southern
boundary. Nine standard conditions are included on the permit.
5.3 A complaint was received from the adjoining landowner to the south stating that the
dwelling was being erected closer to the boundary than the permit allowed.
5.4 Council’s Enforcement Services Officer instructed the applicant to cease work on the
dwelling.
5.5 An application has been received to amend the endorsed plan to re-locate the
proposed siting for the dwelling to 14 metres from the southern boundary pursuant to
condition 1 of the planning permit, which provides the opportunity to amend an
endorsed plan. The request detailed the fact that when drilling stump holes on the
approved site large quantities of rock were discovered, so the dwelling was moved to
14 metres from the boundary fence.
6.
Strategic Relationship
The purpose of the Rural Living Zone relating to this permit is:
‘To provide for residential use in a rural environment.’
7.
8.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
To provide a range of rural living opportunities with
associated land uses in a manner that does not impact
on adjoining land uses.
Financial:
No impact
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Advertising / Referrals
8.1 The original application was not advertised as it was considered that the proposal
would not cause material detriment to any person as it was minor, non-controversial
and of local significance only. The land was previously subdivided for the purpose of
rural living/rural residential type living and the proposal was considered to be
consistent with the Rural Living Zone provisions and complied with setback
requirements for the zone. Also, it has not been Council policy to advertise planning
applications in this particular subdivision in the past.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6559
8.2 Council is not normally required to give formal notification of an application to amend
an endorsed plan under the provisions of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
However, as a matter of courtesy, the application to amend the plan was advertised
to all landowners in the subdivision.
9.
Submissions
9.1 A total of two (2) submissions, one being an objection, were received to the
application to amend the plan:
a) an objection from Faram, Ritchie, Davies on behalf of the adjoining landowner to
the south
b) submission from a landowners on the opposite side of Basin Court.
9.2 The key comments and concerns of the adjoining landowner are summarised as
follows:
 Invasion of privacy as objector’s open space as the rear of his dwelling overlooks
the proposed dwelling.
 Application was not advertised.
 Dwelling not sited in accordance with planning permit. A diagram attached to
submission showed the respective dwellings.
 Questioning that the reason for the re-location of the dwelling was because of
the large quantities of rock encountered. Also stating that the dwelling was
located on its present site before any holes were in fact drilled. It was pointed out
that a dwelling is being erected on land to the north of the property, which is in
fact also a very rocky area.
 Fire regulations would require the clearing of dead wood and undergrowth within
5 metres of the fenceline. Any privacy that the landowner now has will be taken
away if clearing is undertaken.
 Considerable expense to preserve privacy if plan is amended.
9.3 Whilst acknowledging that siting did not directly impact on submitters, the following
comments were made by landowners on the opposite side of Basin Court:
 Persons do seek privacy and dwellings should not be located too close to
boundary.
 Dwelling placed on current site prior to seeking approval to amend planning
permit. Questioned whether consent to re-locate was obtained from Building
Surveyor.
 Precedent set if dwelling re-located without permission.
10. Discussion – Seeking the Balance
The following comments are made in relation to the application for amendment –

The reason that a planning permit was required for the development is because the
area of the lot is less than 8 hectares.

The approved site at 19 metres from the boundary, and in excess of 30 metres from
the dwelling not in the same ownership, complied with the following relevant Rural
Living Zone setback requirements:
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6560
“A permit is required to construct or carry out any of the following:
 A building which is within any of the following setbacks:
- 5 metres from a boundary
- 30 metres from a dwelling not in the same ownership’

Having regard to the purpose of the Rural Living Zone, it has not been Council policy
in the past to advertise an application for a planning permit for a dwelling, providing
that it is located within the required boundary setbacks for the zone. In this case it
was also considered that the existing native vegetation on the lot would provide
some form of limited screening for the adjoining landowner. It is understood from the
applicant that he would be happy to create a further landscaping screen of
vegetation, but the objector has advised Council staff that this is unacceptable. The
amended setback still complies with the setback requirements for the zone.

It is understood that the building cannot be located as per the endorsed plan (ie 19
metres) from the southern boundary due to large boulders below the surface.
Council’s Building Surveyor has confirmed this.

The building was re-located to its current site without Council approval and all work
on the proposed dwelling has now ceased pending the application to amend the
planning permit being assessed.

The objector’s dwelling is not located immediately opposite the proposed dwelling,
but further west. The southern elevation of the proposed dwelling does not contain
any windows. It is considered that these two factors would minimise invasion of the
objector’s privacy.

Council’s Municipal Fire Prevention Officer has confirmed that there is no regulation
requiring the applicant to clear vegetation and undergrowth within 5 metres of the
boundary fence.
Having regard to the above, it is considered that it is appropriate to amend the plan in
accordance with the applicant’s request. If anyone is not happy with this outcome, they
have appeal rights to Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to request the
cancellation of the permit.
There are no appeal rights for a request to amend an endorsed plan under Section 62(3)
of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.
RECOMMENDATION
That the application to amend the endorsed plan attached to Planning Permit No. 822002-528 to site the proposed dwelling 14 metres from the southern boundary of land
contained in PC 168149D, Parish of Waranga, Basin Court, Waranga be approved.
COUNCILLORS MCDONALD / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
A division was called for:
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6561
Those in favour of the Motion:- Councillor Elborough, McDonald, Williams, Toll and Repacholi.
Those against the Motion:- Councillor Riley.
10.14
Sale of Lot 25 Deakin Grove, Tongala (K. Kidd, Administration Manager)
1.
58-08-01
Purpose
To seek Council approval for the sale of Lot 25 (PS 305473F) Deakin Grove, Tongala to
Mark Boylan.
2.
Background
Council has received an offer via the Campaspe Economic Development Board to
purchase Lot 25 Deakin Grove for the amount of $22,000.00 GST exclusive.
3.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
No impact
Financial:
The property has been valued by Hann McKenzie and
Co. at 22,500.00. It is Council’s intention to sell the land
for $22,000.00 GST exclusive with a rebate of $2,000.00
if the ‘Certificate of Occupancy’ is issued within two
years of the settlement date of the contract.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Statutory Implications
Statutory advertising will take place after approval from Council has been received.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council approve the sale of Lot 25 (PS 305473F) Deakin Grove, Tongala to Mark
Boylan for $22,000.00 GST exclusive with a rebate of $2,000.00 if the ‘Certificate of
Occupancy’ is issued within two years of the settlement date of the contract.
2. Council sign and seal the sale documents.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / TOLL
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6562
10.15
Amendment of Delegations
1.
(R Kop, General Manager Assets & Planning)
Purpose
To amend the Instrument of Delegation to staff under the Planning and Environment Act
1987 to allow approval of development plans, for which there are no objections and that
are in accordance with relevant Council policy (see Attachment 10.15).
2.
Background
Council’s planning office is continually seeking ways of streamlining the approval process
to ensure a quality service for applicants.
3.
Content
To speed up the process for developers, it is proposed that staff be delegated powers
through the Instrument of Delegation, to approve development plans when there are no
objections received, and where plans are in accordance with relevant Council policy.
It is recommended that the following staff be authorised to approve development plans:
Planning and Development Manager
General Manager Assets and Planning
Town Planner
Chief Executive Officer.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Land Use Planning
5.
Community Outcomes:
Enable immediate determinations and streamline the
approval process
Financial:
Nil
Service Delivery:
Will provide quicker response to straight forward
development plan applications.
Organisational Development:
Nil
Consultation
This matter has been discussed with the Planning and Development Department.
RECOMMENDATION
Council amend the Instrument of Delegation under the Planning and Environment Act
1987 (“the Act”), to allow the Planning and Development Manager, General Manager
Assets and Planning, Town Planner and Chief Executive Officer to approve development
plans pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Act, when there are no objections and where plans
are in accordance with relevant Council Policy.
Prior to the officer making a decision that the Councillor of the ward be consulted on the
proposed decision.
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6563
COUNCILLORS TOLL / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
A division was called for:
Those in favour of the Motion:- Councillor Elborough, McDonald, Williams, Toll and Repacholi.
Those against the Motion:- Councillor Riley.
10.16
Approval of Stock Disposal Plan (H Major, Senior Operations Engineer and Deputy MERO)
1.
Purpose
To seek Council’s approval for the adoption, and subsequent signing and sealing, of the
Stock Disposal Plan for the Shire.
4.
Background
The Department of Primary Industry (formerly DNRE), has been in discussion with
Council staff for some months in relation to dealing with the disposal of large numbers of
stock.
This has been brought to the fore because of the drought, although this issue was
identified in Council’s Community Risk Management Plan as one to follow up.
5.
Content
The Stock Disposal Plan details the necessary actions for monitoring stock levels within
the municipality, assessment of capacity of processing plants including abattoirs,
knackeries and rendering plants, and the effective disposal of stock in the event of a
natural disaster creating a situation where current processing plant capacities are
exceeded, or the stock are not suitable for disposal by one or more of these methods.
Issues addressed in this Plan:

Monitoring stock numbers

Monitoring of capacity and through -put rates of local and neighbouring processing
plants, (abattoirs, knackeries and rendering plants)

Designation of appropriate stock disposal site locations

Establishment of appropriate methods of stock transport, destruction and burying at
the site.

Monitoring of stock disposed

Management of public awareness and general information.
This plan will be implemented as required in the event of:

Drought
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6564

Disease outbreak

Flooding

Fire

Economic circumstances.
The Stock Disposal Plan will be a sub-plan of the Municipal Emergency Management
Plan.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Corporate Plan 2001 ~ 2004
Community Outcomes
Having the Plan in place will ensure that if, in the event
stock disposal is required to be undertaken, that it can
be handled in the most humane and efficient manner for
both stock, and stockowners.
Financial
Dependent on amount of stock to be disposed of. Costs
would be for:

Digging pit, covering of stock;

Payment for space used;

Ramp, yards;

Site Management.
Some of the costs may be recoverable through State
Funds, depending on the size of the emergency and the
amount of funds expended by Council.
6.
Service Delivery
Nil impact.
Organisational Development
Staff resources will be used to manage the process.
Consultation
Consultation was undertaken with the EPA and landowner involved in site identification,
prior to preparation of the Plan.
This Plan has been discussed with Department of Primary Industry staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Stock Disposal Plan and that the paln be signed under the common
seal of Council.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6565
10.17
Campaspe Heritage Advisory Committee (A. Cockerall, Senior Land Use Planner) 06-03-02
1.
Purpose
To advise of nominations received to advertised positions on the Campaspe Heritage
Advisory Committee.
2.
Background
The Committee’s Charter requires a number of positions to be advertised each year.
These positions were advertised in papers circulating within the Shire for Expressions of
Interest as follows:
Echuca
2 positions
Rochester/Lockington
1 position
Kyabram
1 position
The following nominations were received:Echuca
Geoff Evans (renomination)
Rushworth
Margaret O’Brien (renomination)
Kyabram
No nominations prior to January HAC meeting
It should be noted that a further nomination for the Echuca area and a nomination for the
Kyabram area were received after the January meeting of the Heritage Advisory
Committee. The nominations were received from:
Echuca
Janita Santilla
Kyabram
Lyn Tennent
These nominations will be discussed at the Heritage Advisory Committee meeting on 20
February.
4.
6.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
Identification and protection of Shires heritage assets.
Financial:
No impact.
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Consultation
6.1
Council’s Heritage Adviser has been advised of the nominations received and
recommends that the following members are appointed for a period of three
years:
Echuca
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
Geoff Evans
11 February 2003
6566
Rochester/Lockington Margaret O’Brien
6.2
The Committee has referred the decision to Council.
RECOMMENDATION
1.
That Council appoint the following members to the Campaspe Heritage Advisory
Committee for a period of 3 years:Echuca
Geoff Evans
Rochester/Lockington Margaret O’Brien
2.
That Council appoint the following members to the Campaspe Heritage Advisory
Committee for a period of 3 years, subject to the agreement of the Campaspe
Heritage Advisory Committee.
Echuca
Janita Santilla
Kyabram
Lyn Tennent
COUNCILLORS WILLIAMS / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
11.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EMPLOYMENT
12.
MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE
12.1
Council Meeting Dates (S Ennis, Executive Officer)
1.
Purpose
To confirm Council meeting dates and Council afternoon discussion sessions through to
March 2004.
2.
Background
Council meetings are held on the second Tuesday of each month in Echuca commencing
at 7.00pm. Afternoon discussion sessions on the fourth Tuesday of each month, rotating
around the Shire. Venues and times are discussed with CAG representatives prior to the
date.
The following dates are proposed for meetings through to March 2004.
Date
Council meeting
25 February
11 March
25 March
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
Afternoon discussion session
Torrumbarry
Echuca
Echuca
Koyuga
11 February 2003
6567
8 April
Echuca
Echuca
22 April
13 May
Nanneella
Echuca
Echuca
27 May
10 June
Stanhope
Echuca
Echuca
24 June
8 July
Lockington
Echuca
Echuca
22 July
12 August
Wyuna
Echuca
Echuca
26 August
9 September
Rochester
Echuca
Echuca
23 September
14 October
Colbinabbin
Echuca
Echuca
28 October
11 November
Gunbower
Echuca
Echuca
25 November
9 December
Toolleen
Echuca
Echuca
16 December
Echuca
27 January
Kyabram
10 February
Echuca
Echuca
24 February
9 March
Rushworth
Echuca
Echuca
23 March
3.
4.
Tongala
Balancing the Focus
Community outcomes:
Governance – the rotation of meetings enable the wider
community to participate in their local council and
provides the opportunity to discuss local issues.
Financial:
No impact
Service Delivery:
No impact
Organisational Development:
No impact
Community Consultation
The public would be informed of Council meeting dates through advertisements in
newspapers and community newsletters circulating throughout the Shire.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6568
RECOMMENDATION
That Council resolve to adopt the schedule for meeting dates up to 13 May 2003 as
above.
COUNCILLORS WILLIAMS / MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
12.2
Policy Statement 84 - Drug & Alcohol Policy (Ken Kidd, Administration Manager)
1.
Purpose
To adopt Policy Statement 84 - Drug & Alcohol Policy.
2.
Background
Under Occupational Health and Safety requirements, Council is required to have a formal
drug & alcohol policy in place. The policy is at Attachment 12.2.
Council is required to provide a work environment and work practices, which together
reduce the risks, associated with drug and alcohol use. The policy provides clear
guidelines which take into account our social and legal obligations.
3.
4.
Balancing the Focus
Community Outcomes:
No Impact
Financial:
No Impact
Service Delivery:
No Impact
Organisational Development:
The policy details Council's responsibility and duty for
the health and safety of its employees, its clients and
the public.
Consultation
Nil.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt Policy Statement 84, Drug & Alcohol Policy.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6569
13.
CITIZEN ADVISORY GROUPS & OTHER COUNCIL COMMITTEES
13.1
Minutes Received - Citizen Advisory Groups (S. Ennis – Executive Officer)
Name
Meeting held
Colbinabbin CAG
Gunbower CAG
Kyabram Lancaster CAG
Lockington CAG
Rochester CAG
Rushworth Community Ad Ctee
Stanhope, Girgarre, Corop CAG
Tongala & District CAG
Toolleen & District CAG
2 December 2002 & 6 January 2003
13 January 2003
18 November 2002 & 20 January 2003
17 October 2002
19 November & 17 December 2002
20 January 2003
27 November 2002
13 November & 11 December 2002
19 November 2002
Copy of CAG Minutes have been forwarded to Councillors according to Wards.
RECOMMENDATION
That reports by the Citizen Advisory Groups be received and noted.
COUNCILLORS RILEY / TOLL
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
14.
URGENT BUSINESS / NOTICES OF MOTION
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / WILLIAMS
That Urgent Business be heard.
CARRIED
14.1
State Government Drought assistance
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / WILLIAMS
That Council write to the Minister for Agriculture, the Hon Bob Cameron and the Minister
for State and Regional Development, the Hon John Brumby asking them to reconsider
their decision to withdraw the $20,000 State Government funding assistance provided to
farmers. Invite both Ministers to visit the region so that they can see first hand the affect
of this decision and to meet people affected by the reversal of this previous funding
commitment.
CARRIED.
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
6570
15.
TENDER EVALUATION REPORTS
15.1
Contract No. 14-02-2145 – Lease of Wet Dock Mooring (B. Carrolan – Contracts Manager)
RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council do not accept the non conforming tender of Gary Byford and Council
Officers be authorised to continue negotiations with the tenderer to either withdraw
or vary tender offers which conflict with the requirements of the tender document.
2. That Council do not accept the non conforming tender received from Classic
Steamboat Cruises and that the tenderer be advised that the premium lease payment
offered is below market value.
COUNCILLORS TOLL / REPACHOLI
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
15.2
Contracts Accepted Under Delegated Authority (B. Carrolan, Contracts Manager) 14-02-001
RECOMMENDATION
That the report be received and noted.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / MCDONALD
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
15.3
Contract No. 14-02-2162 – Municipal Valuation Services for years 2004, 2006 & 2008 (B.
Carrolan – Contracts Manager & P. Sing – Revenue Manager)
RECOMMENDATION
1.
That Council accept the tender from LG Valuation Services to provide revaluations
for the Shire inclusive of supplementary and other valuation services required by
Council for the years:2004 for the sum of $206,645 + Schedule of Rates
2006 for the sum of $206,645 + Schedule of Rates
2008 for the sum of $206,645 + Schedule of Rates
2. That Council sign and seal Contract Documents for Contract 14-02-2162 Provision of
Valuation Services.
3.
That Council, the “Shire of Campaspe” cause a General Revaluation in accordance
with the prepared guidelines of Valuation Best Practice for the total area included
within the Shire with such revaluation to be returned March 31, 2004 and to be used
for rating purposes effective from July 1, 2004 with the appropriate notices to be
served on the Office of the Valuer General and other rating Authorities interested in
Shire of Campaspe – Open Section
11 February 2003
6571
the valuations of the said properties under Section 6(I) of the Valuation of Land Act
1960.
COUNCILLORS REPACHOLI / RILEY
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED
16.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
In accordance with Section 89 of the Local Government Act 1989, the following items will be
considered as Confidential Business:
17.
RATIFICATION OF CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS MOVED TO OPEN MINUTES
No item was moved into the open minutes.
There being no further business, the meeting concluded at 8.22 pm.
...........................................
JOHN ELBOROUGH
MAYOR
Shire of Campaspe – Open section
11 February 2003
Download