APUSH 2A Name: Alexander Huang Date: September 7, 2010 Growing Conflict with England Analyze the ways in which British imperial policies between 1763 and 1776 intensified colonials’ resistance to British rule and their commitment to republican values Colonists’ response: British Policies: 1. intended purpose & 2. terms of the policy 1763 Proclamation of 1763 Placed exact borders for the colonies; colonists could not expand past the boundaries the Proclamation set. This was to prevent Native American threats to the colonies. 1764 Sugar Act The first law ever passed that raised revenue from the colonies to the English crown. This law taxed sugar. Also, the law increased the duty on foreign sugar imported from the West Indies. 1765 Stamp Act Pay down debt incurred from the French & Indian War; Direct tax on documents that need to be official 1. 2. Identify how and why the colonists responded How did colonists’ response show republican values? The colonists felt that the British were taking the land, which they fought and died for, away. They felt oppressed and servants of the English crown, despite their own belief that they can govern themselves similar to an independent country. The colonists, again, were feeling incredibly oppressed by the British. These taxes signified a form of maltreatment that had not occurred before the Seven Years’ War. They protested, and the duties were lowered. Non-importation: boycotting of all British goods; Women participate in politics by organizing boycotts; Daughters of liberty 1765 Quartering Act This act, passed in 1765, allowed British soldiers in Again, the colonists were angered at this act. They felt several colonies to stay and eat in any American home. little loyalty to the English throne, and helping one that This, to the British, seemed like a proper and fair law appeared to be oppressing them was unacceptable. to place, for this the least colonists could do to compensate for the free British defense. 1766 Declaratory Act The Declaratory Act was a direct confrontation to the colonist protests. This act allowed Parliament to “bind” the colonies “in all cases whatsoever.” It gave the English throne the ability to control the North American colonies without fail. 1767 Townshend Acts ”Champagne Charley” Townshend, who was notorious to be able to make brilliant speeches even while drunk, created the Townshend acts. The Townshend acts placed imposts on several goods such as glass, white lead, paper, paint and tea. Like every other act, the Declaratory Act had a great, negative impact on the colonists. Unlike the other acts, the Declaratory Act occurred right after the repeal of the Stamp Act—a time of great rejoice and veneration towards Britain and King George III. This brick wall of a policy hit the colonists with a spontaneous force. These protests were greater than ever, renewed by the anger caused in the Declaratory Act. Even though the tax from the Townshend Acts were “external,” meaning indirect, the Americans still considered it a tax without representation. This eventually, along with the suspension of the legislature in 1767, caused protests, and increased colonial smuggling in Massachusetts. They taunted the redcoats, calling them “ruffians” and “bloody backs.” APUSH 2A Name: Alexander Huang Date: September 7, 2010 Samuel Adams created the Committee of Correspondence. 1770 British troops stationed in Boston Britain sent these troops to be stationed in Boston because they felt that the Bostonians would soon begin to stop obeying laws altogether. Troops in Boston would help govern the colonist body and keep law and order in good shape. 1773 Tea Act In 1773, the British East India Company faced bankruptcy when it could not sell its 17 million pounds of tea. As a result, the ministry allowed the British East India Company to sell all of its tea to the companies, making tea incredibly cheap—but fatefully, with a tax. 1774 Quebec Act This act granted the province of Quebec greater territory, giving the French living there a greater flexibility to incorporate their culture into Britain’s. 1774 Intolerable Acts The “Intolerable Acts” were acts designed to keep Boston in ordered control. Acts like the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston’s port until the damages were paid for, were part of the Intolerable Acts. A new Quartering Act allowed British troops to even lodge in private homes. Other laws restricted the rights of the colonies similar to that of the Dominion of New England about a century ago. 1775 Lexington & Concord; Bunker Hill In April 1775, Britain sent troops to Lexington and Again, the colonists felt greatly oppressed by the British government. However, this time, the troops were physical representatives of the Britain they hated so much. On the evening of March 5, 1770, a crowd of colonists began to taunt and jeer at the troops. This clash, which would later be known as the Boston Massacre, later escalated into the colonists physical attacks on the redcoats, at the very least throwing snowballs at the terrified troops. Without warning, these troops fired upon the crowd, killing or wounding eleven citizens. Later, this unorganized attack on the colonists would be a catalyst for Revolution. The colonists, instead of rejoicing at the cheaper prices, felt that they were being tricked into accepting taxation. The colonists began to protest with more vigor than ever before. In certain cities, the colonists would assemble mass demonstrations to force cargo ships carrying tea back to Britain. An extreme case was the Boston Tea Party, where hundreds of colonists, disguised as Native Americans, raided the tea ships in the Boston harbor and dumped hundreds of pounds of tea into Bostonian waters. Colonists also felt wrathful at the passing of the Quebec Act, despite it being a reasonable act in Britain’s eyes—this act could not have been passed at a worse time. Those who desired the land of the Ohio valley were angered when it was snatched away from them for Quebec. Also, anti-Catholics felt that Britain was straying away from the original Protestant idea that dominated in America. These acts enraged Boston dramatically. Their rights were slipping away incredibly fast, and contrary to British belief, this created even more protest. With town meeting curbed, restrictions implanted, and their port gone, the colonists were expected to surrender to British control. However, other colonies greatly supported the rebellious nature of the Bostonians, and as a result, the protests continued. The Intolerable Acts were known as, in America, “the massacre of American Liberty.” In Lexington, the American minutemen refused to APUSH 2A Name: Alexander Huang Concord to capture rebel leaders Samuel Adams and John Hancock. They were also given orders to seize stores of colonial gunpowder to prevent an armed conflict from occurring. The redcoats had a clash with the minutemen in Bunker Hill. 1775 Lord Dunmore’s Proclamation In 1775, Lord Dunmore proclaimed that any slave or indentured servant that escaped his master and reached Dunmore could join Britain’s royal forces as a free man. Date: September 7, 2010 disperse, and thus the British fired upon them. 8 minutemen were killed, and many more were wounded. In Concord, the troops were ready. At least seventy redcoats were killed in the clash, with the minutemen gaining the advantage by firing behind stonewalls. In total, Britain suffered three hundred casualties, and the troops were forced to retreat back to Boston. With American strategy trading space for time, Benjamin Franklin predicted that by the time 150 Patriots died in Bunker Hill, 60,000 babies were born. Colonists responded immediately in great fury. Maryland and Virginia tightened slave patrols, but thousands of blacks continued to escape. This probably was a great hindrance to the Americans, but again, this probably led to protest and even more incentive to start Revolution. Nonimportation: The act of refusing or boycotting imported goods, making their own resources and goods instead. The Association: A complete boycott of all British goods: the combination of nonimportation, nonexportation, and nonconsumption. APUSH 2A Name: Alexander Huang British Colonial Trade Regulations, 1651-1764 Act/Regulation Date Navigation Act 1651 Navigation Act 1660 Staple Act 1663 Plantation Duty Act 1673 Required all crews to be at least 1/2 English in nationality Most goods must be carried on English or colonial ships Goal: eliminate Dutch competition from colonial trading routes Required all colonial trade to be on English ships Master and 3/4 of crew must be English Long list of "enumerated goods" developed, including tobacco, sugar, rice, that could only be shipped to England or an English colony Required goods bound for the colonies shipped from Africa, Asia, or Europe to first be landed in England before shipping to America. Required colonial ship captains to guarantee that they would deliver enumerated goods to England or suffer financial penalties. Colonial arm of English customs offices established 1696 Woolens Act 1699 Hat Act 1732 Molasses Act 1733 American Revenue Act 1764 (Sugar Act) From: Greg Feldmeth Significance/Features Navigation Act Date: September 7, 2010 Further tightened earlier Navigation Acts Created system of admiralty courts to enforce trade regulations and punish smugglers Customs officials given power to issue writs of assistance to board ships and search for smuggled goods To prevent competition with English producers, prohibited colonial export of woolen cloth. Prohibited export of colonial-produced hats. All non-English imported molasses taxed heavily to encourage importation of British West Indian molasses. Lord Grenville institutes new policies to generate revenue by combining new duties on imported goods with strict collection provisions. Tax on French West Indies molasses was actually lowered, but enforcement attempted to end bribes and smuggling.