SITUATION AND DECISION BRIEFING
A Manhattan Project Is Required to Rapidly Develop and
Implement World-Wide Free EM Energy from the Active Vacuum
T. E. Bearden Aug. 13, 2008
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
The Overall Situation
We assume the recipient is aware of (a) the increasing energy crisis and global
warming today, (b) the various proposals to address the energy problem and the severe
shortcomings of each, and (c) the fact that all present proposals are at best stop-gap
measures simply postponing world disaster and not yielding any real solution.
As Al Gore incisively stated in July 2008, "The survival of the United States of
America as we know it is at risk. And even moreif more should be required—the future
of human civilization is at stake."
We also strongly support Gore's statement in latter 2007 that “What we are going
to have to put in place is a combination of the Manhattan Project, the Apollo Project and
the Marshall Plan, and scale it globally.” That is what has to be done programmatically
and very quickly, to resolve the problem.
We add the specific direction that the solution must take: We must quickly achieve
and implement practical new "energy from the vacuum" electric power systems that act
as "EM windmills" freely receiving and using EM energy from the ceaseless and
inexhaustible "EM energy winds" of the modern interacting vacuum.
Energy from the vacuum is the easiest thing in the universe to evoke. Every
charge or dipole in the universe continuously pours out a real "free EM energy wind"
extracted from its vacuum interaction. It will do so as long as the charge or dipole
existseven till the end of time.
The only problem is in building a proper "windmill system" to sit in that free EM
energy wind, diverge and collect some of the energy, and then use this freely collected
EM energy to power our loads. The pundits say this cannot be done. It can.
In 2007, Astronaut Brian O'Leary's open letter to Al Gore in 2007 pointed out the
problem with most organized science of today, when he stated “…don't rely exclusively
on those mainstream scientists, journalists and pundits who deny the reality of new
energy. They are just as ignorant as those scientists who denied the practicality of
aviation even after the Wright brothers were flying. But to expect the Wrights to
immediately deliver a 737 would have been unrealistic.”
1
Ignored Aspects Of The Situation
Energy and Work Are Misunderstood. We strongly stress Nobelist Feynman's
admonition to our scientists, in his three volumes of physics in 1964, that "It is important
to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of what energy is." {1}
As pointed out so strongly by the Physics Teacher, {2} energy is not the capacity
to do work. We add that, instead, the change of form of energy is the rigorous definition
of "work". And, after the work (change of form of the energy) is done, one still has the
energy remaining in the changed form, since energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
Indeed, the energy in its new form can even be used to do additional free work, if it still
remains in the system and under its control! There is no conservation of work law; only a
conservation of energy law.
All EM Energy Comes Freely From the Seething Vacuum. Oddly, since 1957
and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang, we have known that all EM energy
flowing in every EM field and potential in every EM system comes freely from the
virtual state vacuum. This is via the proven broken symmetry of the source dipole (and of
the source charge and its polarized vacuum charge of opposite sign). Every joule of EM
energy in this universe comes or has come from the vacuum in that exact manner.
Nobelist Lee succinctly pointed out, e.g., that when we have a broken symmetry,
something formerly virtual becomes observable {3}.
Van Flandern gives us a beautiful analogy of a "static" EM field being made of
finer parts in continuous steady motion. Quoting: “To retain causality, we must
distinguish two distinct meanings of the term ‘static’. One meaning is unchanging in the
sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by
continual replacement of all moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of
a waterfall. A frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static
in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has
moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate.
…So are … fields for a rigid, stationary source frozen, or are they continually
regenerated? Causality seems to require the latter.” {4}.
The Universe Is Filled With "Free EM Energy" Sources. Every charge and
every dipole {5} is thus a free source of an endless outpouring of real observable, usable
EM energy. The energy is freely absorbed as virtual photons from the seething virtual
state vacuum and integrated coherently to quantum sizethen re-emitted as the steady
stream of real, observable EM energy comprising the so-called "static" EM fields
associated with the charge or dipole.
There is no problem in producing all the free "EM energy flow from the active
vacuum" that one wishes, anywhere, anytime. Just gather together some charge or form a
2
dipole. "Free EM energy winds" are easily evoked and will flow forever, so long as we
simply leave the source charges or dipoles intact and do not destroy them.
Further, in modern physics the "simple source charge"such as a single
electronis actually comprised of two infinite charges, {6} each having infinite energy.
There is an infinite "bare" charge in the middle, having infinite energy, surrounded by an
infinite charge (also having infinite energy) in the surrounding polarized vacuum
medium. However, the difference between these two infinite charges is finiteand is the
standard "classical" value of the charge printed in the textbooks and "measured" by our
instruments peering through the infinite screening charge at the infinite internal bare
charge and "seeing" only the "finite difference".
Hence any classical charge or classical dipole can and will pour out a steady and
unending finite flow of EM energy for any finite length of time. And so it
doesproducing and continually replenishing what are known classically as the "static
fields" of the source charge or dipole.
There is no "energy" availability problem! There is no problem at all in evoking
very powerful and continuous free flows of EM energy, anywhere in the universe,
anytime, very cheaply and easily. Every charge and dipole in the universe is already
doing it, has always done it, and will continue doing it until the end of time, if the charge
or dipole is not destroyed.
We point out immediately that, since all our EM circuits and systems have a
source dipole, then something very odd and bizarre in every circuit or system must be
destroying that source dipole all the time. Else every EM dipolar circuit and system
would already be a "never-ending free EM energy from the vacuum" system. In short,
our own electrical engineers and scientists are building something into every EM system
that deliberately and continually destroys its source dipole. We will return to that point.
The only problem, then, is to build the proper "EM windmill", completely
disconnected from the "source of the EM energy wind" (the source dipole), that will
intercept and catch some of the freely flowing EM wind energy, then separately dissipate
that collected EM energy in the loads to separately power them.
Insight From Group Theory. As two Nobelists have told us, the most
penetrating insight we can have into equations (models) and physical systems is in terms
of group theory. Quoting: "It is increasingly clear that the symmetry group of nature is
the deepest thing that we understand about nature today." {7}
Applying such penetrating group theory insight, we recognize that such a proper
"EM windmill" system is a priori an asymmetric EM system. And we discover to our
horror that the deliberately truncated electrical engineering model used by all our
electrical engineers contains only symmetrical EM systems!
3
Crippling of Electrical Engineering and Electrical Power Systems. In 1892, Lorentz
was elicited to symmetrize the already-truncated Heaviside equations, {8} so that the
resulting crippled Heaviside-Lorentz equationsthereafter used as the standard electrical
engineering modelwould be used in the new electrical engineering from its very birth.
This was done specifically upon orders from J. P. Morgan to guarantee that none of the
confounded "Tesla systems freely taking and using EM energy from the active medium"
would ever be developed by this future electrical engineering. {9}
Electrical Engineering Crippled Since Birth. Since the very birth of electrical
engineering, the world's electrical engineers have thought, designed, developed, and
implemented only symmetrical electrical power systems. They have been totally unable
to think or build such a required "proper EM windmill" to tap the ubiquitous free flows of
energy. They fail to take advantage of the fact that every joule of EM energy in the
universe is freely received as a free EM energy output flow from the seething vacuum's
interaction with our source charges and source dipoles, where the output flow is emitted
as real EM energy (real photons) pouring freely from those charges and dipoles.
This is the reason all our engineers and scientists are so convinced thatexcept
for a few areas such as wind energy, solar cell energy, hydroturbine power, etc.to
obtain EM energy they must consume fuel. They have been totally concerned only with
symmetrical EM systems. And so they have never even learned to build a proper
asymmetrical "EM energy flow windmill system" to easily tap the incredible numbers of
free EM energy wind flows spewing from every charge and dipole in the universe.
Maxwell's Theory Includes Asymmetric Systems. Such asymmetric
"windmill" systems do occur widely in Maxwell's original theory, though not in the
mutilated subset in electrical engineering. Teslawho gave us AC power, the rotating
magnetic field that makes modern generators possible, radio, robotics, and many other
advancesalso had discovered asymmetric Maxwellian circuits and systems. He was
hell-bent on giving the world free EM energy, based on his "asymmetric circuit"
discoveries. Quoting Tesla:
"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable
at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of
Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of
one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy
static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kineticand this we know it is, for
certainthen it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their
machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." {10}.
“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the
world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels."
“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever
inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any
material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the
4
possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any
point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” {11}.
"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be
rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." {12}
Tesla later also showed his total disdain for the horribly flawed old HeavisideLorentz theory (then known generally as the "Hertz" theory). Quoting Tesla:
"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I
do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most
remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been
recorded in history." {13}
The Suppression of Tesla. To prevent his development and delivery of free
"energy from the active medium" systems, Tesla was trapped and eventually destroyed by
Morgan, as was Tesla's backer, Westinghouse. Meanwhile, in 1892, Morgan's scientific
advisors elicited Lorentz to "fix" the new Heaviside equations just being prepared for
introduction into universities to give birth to what was to be called "electrical
engineering." {9}
Tesla Was Not a Crackpot. Well, was Tesla just a "nut" and totally deluded?
Absolutely not! As an example, Barrett {14} has rigorously shown that EM expressed in
quaternions (a higher group symmetry algebra) allows shuttling and storage of potentials
in circuits, and also allows additional EM functioning of Tesla's circuits that a
conventional EM analysis cannot reveal. He shows that Tesla’s patented circuits did
exactly this "energy shuttling", and that Tesla could thus asymmetrically dissipate his
shuttled potential energy where and as he wished. We stress that Barrett is a renowned
higher group symmetry electrodynamicist and one of the pioneers of ultrawideband radar.
Conclusion: Science Unwittingly Causes The Present Energy Crisis
Three Major Erroneous Omissions Were Arbitrarily Made. So, eerily, the
steady movement of symmetric-EM-systems-only electric-powered civilization toward
the present world energy crisis and its associated global warming crisis was actually
implemented and maintained by science itself in several severely restrictive and arbitrary
actions in 1892 {8}, 1900 {15}, and 1934 {16} specifically. These restrictions simply
discarded all possible EM systems taking their energy freely from the "active medium"
and using it to freely power the loads. Those arbitrary restrictions are still applied and
upheld in our electrical engineering technology and by the conventional scientific
community as an iron dogma.
In 1892 Lorentz Arbitrarily Symmetrized the Heaviside Equations. As stated,
this arbitrarily discarded all the asymmetric "free energy from the vacuum" Maxwellian
5
systems. M. W. Evans et al. {17} give rigorous proof that eliminating the arbitrary 1892
Lorentz symmetry condition does provide asymmetric EM systems having free additional
energy currents from the vacuum, for use in powering loads.
In 1900 Lorentz Also Taught Scientists to Discard the Giant Curled
Heaviside Component of the EM Energy Flow From Every Generator Or Primary
Source. In 1900 Lorentz was further elicited to condition the professors and electrical
engineers to universally and blithely eliminate Heaviside's astounding discovery that
every generator already extracts from the vacuum and emits trillions of times as much
EM energy as the mechanical energy we crank into its shaft to keep restoring the source
dipole. Lorentz taught them a simple little surface integration trick that rids one of the
troublesome divergence-free curled component. {15}. He justified it by proclaiming that
this giant curled flow "has no physical significance".
The same claim is still repeated by classical electrodynamicists and electrical
engineering. E.g., quoting Jackson: "...the Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that
the curl of any vector field can be added to it. Such an added term can, however, have no
physical consequences. Hence it is customary to make the specific choice …" {18}.
Jackson is correct in any special relativity (GR) situation, since then the
divergence of the curl is always zero. However, for a properly synchronized general
relativity situation, the divergence of the curl need not be zero after all, and Jackson is
wrong. In the GR case, a part of that giant curled Heaviside component can indeed be
diverged and absorbed, and thus converted into a usable Poynting component.
Obtaining Energy From the Giant Curled Heaviside Energy Flow
Component. In the well-known optical NRAM (negative resonance absorption of the
medium) systems and effects, the GR section absorbs input energy and then re-emits
some 18 times as much Poynting energy flow as was input. This "excess emission" is
well-established, but the physicists are forced to use the phrase "negative absorption" and
never to use the phrase "excess emission". They are also not allowed to consider the
gigantic uncurled Heaviside energy flow component that was also input to the GR
section. And of course they are not allowed to discuss the thermodynamics of NRAM.
But this self-resonating GR section will also convert a small bit of the input giant
curled Heaviside energy flow to diverged (Poynting) energy flow, thus producing the
excess emission (euphemistically called "negative absorption").
The self-resonating charged particles in the GR section absorbing the normal
input EM energy flow will thus output some 18 times as much diverged EM energy
emission (Poynting EM energy flow) as was in the Poynting EM energy flow component
that was input to the GR section {19}. But to preserve their scientific standing and
reputations (and get their papers published), the optical physicists are never allowed to
say "excess emission", but must use the mind-numbing phrase "negative absorption".
And they are not allowed to say "COP = 18" or "COP = 1800%", but must say that "the
reaction cross section is increased 18-fold".
6
This giant Heaviside energy flowaccompanying the feeble Poynting diverged
energy flow component in every circuit and systemis in peculiar "curled" form. Hence
normally (i.e., in any special relativity situation), it does not diverge into the circuit, and
so it usually just escapes and does nothing at all. We will be proposing an application of
the known but concealed general relativity NRAM situation that does allow divergence
and use of some of that available giant Heaviside curled EM energy flow: We will use it
to propose self-powering steam generators by an appropriate clamped positive feedback
NRAM system modification of the present steam generators in almost all our present
electrical power systems.
Once the NRAM-modified steam boiler is up and running, clamped positive
feedback is switched in for self-powering. Thereafter the primary power plant can be shut
down and is no longer needed. A single "jump-started" self-powering steam generator can
then use part of its output power to "jump-start" additional self-powering steam
boilersas many as needed.
Frightened Physicists Largely Ripped Negative Energy From Physics. In
1934, a thoroughly frightened physics leadership (including, e.g., Heisenberg and Pauli)
strongly and deliberately forced the inappropriate removal of negative energy from
Dirac's theory. This was a horrible mistake, crippling all of physics from then on.
As Hotson pointed out, “...if one had to point to a single place where science
went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of
Dirac’s equation.” {16}
If the negative energy of the local vacuum is not arbitrarily removed, the
statistical operations underlying any and all observable physics entities (and thus
continually creating and sustaining observed physical reality itself) can be directly
engineered at will, by judicious use of both positive and negative vacuum energy and the
resulting positive and negative probabilities.
In modern physics, anything in our observed physical reality actually is
continually being created and sustained by its underlying statistical operations and
probabilities, all the way "up" in size from the virtual state "bubbling" vacuum. The
virtual vacuum is not an "emptiness" filled with bubbles; instead, it is just the bubbles,
where those continually interacting with positive energy with each other do produce
higher and higher realities until the quantum threshold is crossed and observable reality
particles and structures and forces are generated.
Use of Negative Energy and Negative Probabilities. By judicious use of both
positive and negative underlying statistical probabilities, one then can directly engineer
physical reality itself. One can not only cause an observable thing to "happen" and
"continually be there" because of positive energy of the vacuum and positive
probabilities, but with negative energy of the "tickled vacuum" he can also cause such an
observable thing to "unhappen" and just vanish, and then continually "be absent". He
7
simply (and deliberately) changes the energy and probabilities of the underlying
statistical operations that create and sustain physical reality structures themselves.
Negative energy for activating these negative probabilities can easily be added to
a local vacuum in a specific region by simply "tickling" the local Dirac Sea with sharp
little low-energy pulses throughout that region {20}. This pops out electrons, leaving
behind Dirac holes. These Dirac holes are actually negative mass-energy electrons (or
dark matter) thatas source chargescontinually emit negative energy photons which
continually forms and replenishes their associated negative energy fields (dark energy).
Instead of peering through his telescope and fervently seeking distant dark matter
and dark energy, the astrophysicist can readily produce both dark matter and dark energy
on the laboratory bench and investigate their phenomenology. Bedini, e.g., has been
producing and using dark matter and dark energy in his revolutionary battery charging
systems and electrical power systems for 25 years.
By removing those arbitrary and self-imposed scientific restrictions {8}{15}{16},
the energy crisis and associated global warming do have a very unexpected solution—
systems that freely receive and use EM energy from the vacuum, and which are practical,
relatively inexpensive, quick, and permanent.
By the judicious re-addition of negative energy to the local active vacuum, the
negative energy vacuum will also "unhappen" the water molecule's O-H bond, so that the
water molecules fall apart into H2 and O2 bubbles, as in the independently tested and
proven Kanzius watergas process {21}.
Such an additional negative energy "froth" added into the local vacuum can also
"unhappen" a specific disease condition, as is also being independently proven for
Kanzius' new cancer cure process {22}. With further progress, eventually scientists
should be able to cure most debilitating diseasessimply, easily, cheaply, and quickly.
The transition to the deliberate use of negative energy (and negative probabilities)
of the local vacuum interaction requires a dramatic change of the presently enforced
"positive Dirac energy only" scientific paradigmwhich simply ignores the negative
solution that was present in modern physics before being mostly removed. Dean Dan
Solomon, e.g., has published very important papers strongly showing that negative
energy cannot be logically removed from physics {23}.
Solving the Energy Crisis Is a Physics Problem. From the above discussions,
we strongly point out that the solution to the world energy crisis is a physics solution and
it is not present at all in present electrical engineering (EE). The sad old mutilated EE
model was glued together in the 1880s and then it was deliberately and horribly crippled
in 1892 and 1900, before most of modern physics was even born. With the removal of
negative energy from Dirac physics in 1934, the suppression was complete.
8
Since the highly defective electrical engineering model has no active vacuum
included in it, obviously it cannot model or design EM systems that do freely take and
use EM energy from the vacuum to freely power their loads. Or "unhappen" water
molecule O-H bonds. Or "unhappen" cancer and other debilitating disease conditions.
All EM systems do already take all their EM energy directly from the vacuum via
the broken symmetry of the source dipole. So obviously electrical engineering is horribly
fouled, since it does not correctly model where its own EM energy comes from or how.
Electrical engineering does not even teach how an EM circuit or system is actually
powered, and it has never done so!
Such is not included in the EE model itself, and today no practicing electrical
engineer actually knows how his external circuit is potentialized and "powered"or the
real reason why he has to keep cranking the shaft of the generator.
Modern physics, however, does include the active virtual state vacuum which
continually interacts with every charge and dipole and which participates in generating
every force including all EM forces.
Also, modern physics already includes higher group symmetry electrodynamics
models which (a) are not electrical engineering but way beyond it, and (b) do model the
active vacuum and its interaction with charged matter. Hence it is such "higher group
symmetry electrodynamics" wherein physics already has the necessary answer to the
world energy crisis! It's there; it just requires "putting together" and doing.
Higher Group Symmetry Electrodynamics Must Be Applied. The higher
group symmetry electrodynamics answer to the energy crisis has not been pursued or
applied because of (a) the accepted physics practice of rather totally ignoring the "crude
old electric power" as being beneath the dignity of the physicists themselves, and (b) the
conviction of the electrical engineers that their horribly flawed model is actually "perfect"
and infallible.
As an example, the response to this author from the National Science
Foundation's top electrical staff in control of electric power, communications, etc. was
that there was nothing at all wrong with the EE model; after all, your TV set works,
doesn't it? This was after the NSF itself (including NSF physicists in the review) had just
reviewed {24} and passed a paper {25} listing the falsities contained in the standard
electrical engineering model, falsities long pointed out by Nobelists and eminent
scientists!
Our answer to the NSF electrical staff, of course, is that our TV set works only as
long as we continually pay to restore its source dipole that the silly arbitrarilysymmetrized EE systempromulgated by that very NSF electrical staffcontinually
"kills". It is incredibly shortsighted to continue to build only those EM systems which do
continually use half their freely collected "energy from the vacuum" to kill their internal
9
source of free energy from the vacuum, so that we then have consume fuel etc. to pay for
continually restoring that source dipole.
We do not consume all that fuel and pay all that money for the energy to power
the loads. Instead, we do it to keep restoring the source dipole that a very archaic and
dogmatic self-symmetrizing electrical system keeps continually destroying! Once made,
the source dipole freely furnishes the EM energy to power the loads, taking that energy
directly from its interaction with the seething vacuum.
How a Generator and Its External Circuit Are Powered. Let us examine the
input of mechanical shaft energy into a generator, by paying to crank the shaft. Once the
generator starts to rotate, the input mechanical shaft energy is transduced in form
(courtesy of Nikola Tesla) into rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator. Since
change of form of energy is the rigorous definition of work, then cranking the shaft
requires work.
But we still have the rotating magnetic field energy inside the generator.
So then what happens to the rotating magnetic field energy?
All of it is dissipated against the local charges inside the generatorforcing the
positive charges in one direction and the negative charges in the other, and thereby
forming the internal source dipole. The rotating magnetic field energy is dissipated
(escapes from the entire generator system) in that process. None of it pours out of the
generator terminals to power the external circuit.
And that is all that cranking the shaft of the generator does. It restores or forms
the destroyed or being-destroyed source dipole inside the generator. None of that input
energy that we pay to input to the shaft of the generator, goes into powering the external
circuit and the loads!
Once that source dipole is formed, it is the internal source's "broken symmetry".
As well-known in physics but totally absent from electrical engineering, once formed the
source dipole's broken symmetry (a) freely absorbs virtual EM energy from its seething
vacuum interaction, (b) integrates the absorbed subquantal energy to quantal size, and
then (c) pours out of the generator terminals a vast flow of real, quantal, observable,
usable EM energy.
This gigantic energy flow from the terminals is along through space surrounding
the external conductors. The flow is comprised of two components: (a) the tiny Poynting
energy flow that diverges into the external conductors to power up the electrons, and (b)
the gigantic (trillions of times larger) curled Heaviside energy flow component that is
usually not diverged at all, so does not interact with anything and just roars on off into
space and is wasted.
10
But the electrical engineer builds his self-symmetrizing system by connecting the
external circuit and its loads in a closed current loop with the internal source dipole of
the generator. So one-half the freely collected Poynting energy in the external circuit is
then used to force the spent electrons back through the generator's internal source dipole,
against its back electro-motive force (EMF), thus scattering the separated charges and
destroying the dipole.
In a 100% efficient dipole-restoring process, it will then require as much energy
to restore the dipole charge separation as was used to destroy it. If the process is less than
100% efficient (i.e., has losses), it will require more energy to restore the source dipole
that was used to destroy it.
The other half of the free "energy from the vacuum" collected in the external
circuit is dissipated in the loads and losses of that circuit, in the forward EMF region.
This means that less than half the free energy collected in the external circuit is used to
power the loads.
So to restore the source dipole inside the generator, and thus keep the free energyfrom-the-vacuum flowing out of the generator terminals so that it will keep powering the
loads, we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator with more mechanical energy
than is in the useful output energy doing work in our loads.
We strongly iterate that we do not crank the shaft of the generator to directly
power the loads! It is necessary in order to restore the internal source dipole, that the EE
self-symmetrizing circuit is foolishly built to continue to destroy!
And because of the way the symmetrizing circuit is built, it will always require
more energy to continually restore the dipole than the system delivers to effectively
power the loads.
Thus we pay our electrical engineers to always design self-symmetrizing
electrical power circuits that (a) deliberately engage in a giant wrestling match inside
their own generators, and (2) always lose!
The huge and continuing consumption of the dirty fuel and the despoiling of our
biosphere is because of the totally inane type of systems our electrical engineers are
taught to build, and that our "attention elsewhere" physics community blithely ignores!
Our Scientific Blindness Has Caused the Energy Crisis. In summary, the real
and totally unsuspected cause of the rapidly escalating world energy crisis is indeed the
1892 and 1900 crippling of the old electrical engineering model itself and the ubiquitous
use of this horribly mutilated modelfor all our electrical power systemsfor more than
a century. The scientific community is flatly to blame for it! And we can no longer
continue to ignore such scientific blindness and the blithe failure to recognize the real
self-induced problem!
11
Summarizing the Problem and Its Solution:
The Situation:
The present energy paradigm—that one must almost always consume fuel to
dirtily provide EM energy and power—has failed. In our "consume fuel for energy"
world, we are in a serious and escalating world energy crisis because of the peaking of
world fuel supplies and available fuel supply rates, occurring in the face of increasing
populations and increased worldwide demands for energy to enable a decent standard of
living. At the same time we are in an escalating contamination of the biosphere by
increasing fuel wastes and related harmful byproducts, leading toward poisoning of our
planet and rapidly increasing global warming and drastic climatic change.
Since science and engineering are directly responsible for the mutilated electrical
engineering model and practice responsible for this crisis, then the scientific community
has to be forcibly ordered by the political community to solve the EE problem!
Impending Results:
The results now looming are (a) catastrophic collapse of world economies and
monetary systems, (b) rapidly increasing world food shortages, hunger, and starvation,
(c) dramatic and harmful climatic change, melting of polar icecaps (for the arctic, perhaps
as early as 2012), and global heating, and (d) inevitable wars and mass destructions
unleashed between harshly competing nations of the world.
"Solutions" That Are Not Solutions:
Presently all officially proposed "solutions" are slow, very expensive, very
difficult, mostly serving vested interests, mostly still climatically "dirty" or environmentdespoiling, and at best temporary. Most rely on essentially the same "consumption of
fuel" energy systems we presently know and utilize, with important but minor increased
contributions by wind power, solar power, etc.
More of the same things that gave us this severe crisis in the first place will not
solve it. Thus the world crisis escalates toward meltdown.
Special Characteristics of the Situation and of the Required Solution:
The Cause of the Energy Crisis Cannot Be Used for Its Solution. If
"consumption of fuel to obtain needed energy" is the primary problem, then obviously the
startling solution must somehow provide all the energy we need, without consuming fuel!
Solar power, wind power, and hydroelectric power are stop-gap measures, but they will
not solve the problem. Too bulky, too expensive, not dependable, etc.
12
The Solution Must be Clear and Effective. A new and novel solution to the
entire energy problem is absolutely essential. It must be quick, cheap, relatively easy,
very clean, and permanent. Its validity must already be clearly proven scientifically, even
though presently unrecognized for engineering purposes. Further, a clear explanation as
to why it has eluded recognition by our scientific community for more than 100 years
must also be forthcoming. We have given a short overview of it in this paper.
We Must Capitalize on the Sunk Costs of the Power Grid System. As a single
example of the present situation, the U.S. electric power grid consists of three
interconnected and antiquated grids made up of 3,500 utilities serving 283 million people.
It perilously hangs together by a thread, and its dilapidated state threatens many more
massive blackouts similar to a few that have already occurred previously. Any
appreciable terrorist activity or civil unrest could rapidly result in a largely nonfunctioning electric power grid, prostrating almost the entire United States by paralysis
and/or destruction of the electric power grid alone.
Worldwide there is a century of investment in the present totally inadequate
electric power structures, grids, and systems. Since the financial cost for quick grid
system replacement is quite astronomical and unaffordable, the grid must be cleanly and
cheaply “altered” in a revolutionary new break-through manner. It must still be used for a
20-to-40 year period—but with the power plants consuming only very little if any fuel—
while almost immediately and massively furnishing free EM energy directly from the
vacuum as its primary function.
The Problem Is Overwhelmingly Serious. As another example of the criticality
of the problem, a typical U.S. city has about four days food supply on hand at any
moment. The big diesel trucks constantly bring in food resupply daily. If those big diesel
trucks slow and stop, in four days or less we will have mass hunger, rioting, murder, and
total chaos in our cities—literally a national convulsion. The fiercest possible martial law
will be immediately required, with hundreds of thousands of wildly rioting personnel
being hauled to concentration camps already prepared and ready, and other thousands
killed in bringing the rioting and looting and destruction to a halt.
The Solution Must Apply to Centralization and to Decentralization. Hence
the new solution must be adaptable for both great centralization and nearly total
decentralization of electric power. It must be usable for initiating the self-powering of the
huge U.S. power grid or any major part of it, and it must also be usable for powering an
individual home, office building, factory, city, automobile, truck, ship, airplane, or train.
In short, the grid must not stop, the big trucks must not stop, local power to and in
the cities must not stop, and the daily food delivery must not stop. Else the entire system
will convulse and quickly flush itself and the economy right down the tube.
The Solution Must Be Highly Innovative. We have pointed out the use of self-
powering steam boilersonce developedto reduce a giant wind farm requirement to a
13
requirement for a single windmill, to reduce a giant solar power generator array to a far
smaller single "jump-starting" array, etc.
Another example of the innovation required can be taken from a new
development in solar cells deliberately made near molecular size. According to
NewScientist, Victor Klimov and his team in Los Alamos National Laboratory in New
Mexico have constructed a solar cell which can absorb the light of a specific wave length
in a special way, such that one photon can cause energization of more than one electron
{26} {27}. As soon as the electron absorbs a photon, it disappears for a very short
moment into the quantum field.
Being in the virtual state the electron can borrow energy from the vacuum and
thereafter appears again in our reality. Now the electron can energize up to 7 other
electrons, as found by the Klimov team and directly stated by them. This leads to a
theoretical coefficient of performance of 700%.
A COP = 200% can be readily achieved and has been. The experiment has also
been replicated successfully by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden
Colorado.
We point out that, at about COP = 300%, one can conceivably add clamped
(controlled) positive feedback of one of those output electrons and directing it back to the
input, thus replacing the original operator's input. In that case the unit would become
"self-powering" (powered by energy from the vacuum) while putting out the other two
electrons as remaining useful output. Therefore this new development by Klimov and
team points a new, replicated, validated way to approach self-powering solar power cell
generator arrays.
The Solution Must Be Clean. And also the solution must be clean. By being
fuel-free, it is already carbon-free. By using judicious development of key self-powering
components, one eliminates the use of most of the present power plants powering grids
worldwide. The water-cooling requirements for these plants thus are dramatically
reduced and almost eliminated. One has eliminated most of the harmful emissions from
present power systems, etc. And one is taking the power directly from an inexhaustible,
powerful, and clean source: the local active vacuum.
Thus the solution consumes little or no fuel except for initial "jump-starting" the
energy-from-the-vacuum systems. The solution draws its input energy freely from the
ubiquitous active spacetime/vacuum medium, in any amounts needed, and very simply
and easily and cheaply.
As another example of the high cleanness advantages, the Bedini process for
recharging batteries is epochal and uses negative energy as well as positive energy. His
negative energy process will "unhappen" the normal sulfation etc. of a battery,
14
dramatically extending its life several-fold while also increasing the amount of charge it
will accept.
The first Bedini units have already been through Underwriter Laboratory testing,
as has the small production line, and the parent company (Energenx, Inc.) is now
producing about three dozen units per month, primarily for large industrial batteries in
warehouse handling equipment such as forklifts, etc. Systems will shortly be available for
battery powered golf carts etc., and then for electric battery-powered automobiles.
SOLUTION SUMMARY STATEMENT
In summary:
This required new and dramatic solution to the entire energy/fuel/pollution
problem is available for finishing in short order, and it is urgently required.
The solution does require a dramatic "paradigm shift" in our outlook on energy
and energy sources.
It directly requires a major correction to the sadly flawed and horribly crippled
electrical engineering.
Because of the severe worldwide urgency, this energy solution must be developed
in a "Manhattan Project" type manner, and it must be rapidly accomplished and
implemented worldwide.
15
References:
1. Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1, 1964, p. 4-2
2. R. L. Lehrman, “Energy is not the ability to do work,” Physics Teacher, Vol. 15, 1973, p. 15.
3. T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New
York, and London, 1981, p. 181.
4. Tom Van Flandern, “The speed of gravityWhat the experiments say,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 250,
Dec. 21, 1998, p. 8-9.
5. The dipole is a proven broken symmetry; the source charge plus its surrounding polarized vacuum is also
a proven broken symmetry. Hence a source charge or a source dipole freely absorbs virtual energy,
coherently integrates it to observable size, then re-emits the energy as real, observable photonsreal EM
energy flow that continually creates and replenishes the associated "static" EM fields and potentials.
6. E.g., see Nobelist Steven Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory, Vintage Books, Random House, 1993, p.
109-110.
7. R. P. Feynman and S. Weinberg, Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1999, p. 73.
8. H. A. Lorentz, "La Théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants,"
[The Electromagnetic Theory of Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch. Néerl. Sci., Vol. 25,
1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected Papers, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, vol. 2, pp. 168238, esp. p. 168.] This is the work that Lorentz cites later (in 1895) for his proof of the symmetrical
regauging theorems (the two equations of symmetrical regauging).
9. For the full story with reference citations, see the vivid article by Les Pastor and Tom Bearden, The
Deliberate Curtailment of Nikola Tesla's Primary Energy Source, available at link
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Deliberate_Curtailment_of_Nikola_Tesla%27s_Primary_
Energy_Source.
10. Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted
from his biography: Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
1981.
11. Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.
12. Nikola Tesla, 1900.
13. Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.
14. T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation
Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41.
15. Lorentz also arbitrarily discarded the stupendous nondiverged Heaviside curled energy flow
component that pours from the generator terminals in addition to the tiny diverged Poynting component.
See H. A. Lorentz, Vorlesungen über Theoretische Physik an der Universität Leiden, Vol. V, Die
Maxwellsche Theorie (1900-1902), Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft M.B.H., Leipzig, 1931, "Die Energie
im elektromagnetischen Feld," p. 179-186. Figure 25 on p. 185 shows the Lorentz concept of arbitrarily
integrating the energy flow vector around a closed cylindrical surface surrounding a volumetric element.
This is the procedure which arbitrarily selects only a small diverged component of the energy flow
associated with a circuit—specifically, the small Poynting component being diverged into the circuit to
power it—and then treats that tiny component as the "entire" energy flow. Thereby Lorentz arbitrarily
discarded all the gigantic Heaviside circuital energy transport component which is usually not diverged into
the circuit conductors at all, does not interact with anything locally, and is just wasted.
16
16. This is the year that the frightened physics community leadership forcibly removed negative vacuum
energy (and its negative probabilities) from the Dirac electron theory. As we address, this removed the
ability of physics to directly engineer physical reality itself. For the complete story, see D. L. Hotson,
“Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy, Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20.; Part II,
New Energy, Issue 44, 2002, pp. 1-24.
17. M. W. Evans et al., , "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy
from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, p. 513-517.
18. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition, Wiley, 1975, p. 237.
19. See (a) Craig F. Bohren, "How can a particle absorb more than the light incident on it?" Am. J. Phys.
51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 323-327; (b) H. Paul and R. Fischer, {Comment on “How can a particle absorb more
than the light incident on it?’},” Am. J. Phys., 51(4), Apr. 1983, p. 327; (c) V. S. Letokhov, “Generation of
light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., Vol. 53, 1967, p.
1442; (d) V.S. Letokhov, “Generation of light by a scattering medium with negative resonance absorption,”
Sov. Phys. JETP, 26(4), Apr. 1968, p. 835-839: (e) V. S. Letokhov, “Stimulated emission of an ensemble of
scattering particles with negative absorption,” ZhETF Plasma, 5(8), Apr. 15, 1967, p. 262-265; (f) V. S.
Letokhov, “Double  and optical resonance,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 43, 1973, p. 179-180; (g) Alekseev,
A. V.; Zinin, Yu. A.; Sushilov, N. V. “Effect of negative resonance absorption in a weak polychromatic
field,” Optics and Spectroscopy, Volume 69, Issue 6, December 1990, pp.736-739; (h) V. S. Letokhov,
“Laser Maxwell’s Demon,” Contemporary Physics, 36(4), 1995, p. 235-243.
20. This is apparently the method used (unwittingly) by Kanzius for his independently proven and
validated watergas process and his cancer cure process. The very best process, particularly for curing
diseases, is apparently the experimental Bedini/Soviet process of tickling the local vacuum with stress
potential precursors rather than force field precursors. Bedini does this by having a short positive pulse on a
very specific component such as a coil, followed immediately by a short negative pulse on that same coil. If
everything is adjusted just exactly right, no current flows in the coil during the two pulse duration, and with
a "froth" of such carefully obtained stress pulses, the vacuum will have had introduced to it a "froth" of
stress precursors, not force precursors. These can and will stimulate a living system completely, from all
elements of its genetics and cells, etc. on up to all physical parts and sizes. The result is to "shake loose"
most all the accumulated bad stuff, and set the body to something resembling "full healing". The Scenar®
device allowed by the Russians to be sold in the West uses just a tiny bit of this "stress frothing" of the
local vacuum. So it produces results, but not nearly as good as the highest level Soviet communist officials
and their families, and KGB officials and their families, receive. The reader is cautioned never to perform
such actions himself; this information is intended for advanced research only, not for casual
experimentation.
21. Michael O’Mara, “Salt Water Fuel Gets Major University Review”, WKYC News, Sep. 13, 2007.
http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=74285&GID=zk4SwIKSnGIds9hUfynnp+AmKjjO
ke5Fp+37lHLYo9Q%3D. Includes a video clip as well. “This is the biggest discovery in 100 years in water
research!” said Professor Emeritus Rustum Roy, at the Penn State University Materials Lab, who is a
leading expert on the science of water. Dr. Roy tested the Kanzius watergas process rigorously.
PSU research associate, Tania Slawecki said, "I think this is an excellent breakthrough. The steam
engine wasn't invented because thermodynamics existed. The steam engine was invented and then
thermodynamics came along. We've got lots more to discover about this invention, too."
22. Steven M. Sweeny, “Kanzius sees success: Millcreek inventor's treatment kills cancer cells in rabbits”,
Erie Times News, Oct. 31, 2007. (Note: Doctor Steven Curley, M.D. is using the Kanzius RF device for
research at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas). See also
http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071031/NEWS02/710310441/-1/NEWS.
23. (a) Dan Solomon, "Some new results concerning the vacuum in Dirac’s hole theory," Physica Scripta,
Vol. 74, 2006, p. 117–122; (b) Dan Solomon. “Some differences between Dirac's hole theory and quantum
field theory.” Can. J. Phys., Vol. 83, 2005, pp. 257-271; (c) Dan Solomon, “Quantum states with space-like
energy-momentum.” Central European Journal of Physics (CEJP), Vol. 4(3), 2006, pp. 380-392; (d) Dan.
D. Solomon, “Some remarks on Dirac's hole theory versus quantum field theory.” Can. J. Phys., Vol. 81,
17
2003, pp. 1165-1175; (e) “Mathematical Inconsistencies in Dirac Field Theory.” 1999. Available at quantph/9904106; (f) Dan. D. Solomon, “Gauge invariance and the vacuum state.” Can. J. Phys., Vol. 76, 1998,
pp. 111-127; (g) “The stability of the QED vacuum in the temporal gauge.” Apeiron, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2006,
p. 240; (h) Dan D. Solomon, “A new look at the problem of gauge invariance in quantum field theory.
Physica Scripta, Vol. 76, 2007, pp. 64-71. Available at arXiv:0706.2830; (i) . Dan D. Solomon, “Negative
energy density for a Dirac-Maxwell field.” 1999. Available at gr-qc/9907060; (j) Note that Dr. Daniel L.
Solomon is the Dean of the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences at NC State University.
24. The letter from the National Science Foundation, showing that the errors paper passed NSF review, is
given at http://www.cheniere.org/references/NSF%20letter%20Bearden.jpg.
25. For the 30+ page paper that details the many serious falsities in the CEM/EE model, see T. E. Bearden,
“Errors and Omissions in the CEM/EE Model,” available at
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/CEM%20Errors%20%20final%20paper%20complete%20w%20longer%20abstract4.doc.
26. See Herb Brody, "Solar Power - Seriously Souped Up." NewScientist, May 27, 2006, p 45.
27. For further information see (a) Richard D. Schaller, Vladimir M. Agranovich and Victor I. Klimov;
"High-efficiency carrier multiplication through direct photogeneration of multi-excitons via virtual singleexciton states." Nature Physics Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 189-194. See also (b) Richard D. Schaller, Melissa A.
Petruska, and Victor I. Klimov; "Effect of electronic structure on carrier multiplication efficiency:
Comparative study of PbSe and CdSe nanocrystals"; Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 87, 2005, 253102.
18