master of science in energy management

advertisement
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR 2014-2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
PART ONE: PROGRAM OUTCOMES
The Program Outcomes of the M.S. in Energy Management program are the following:
Graduates of the M.S. in Energy Management program are expected to:
1. Compare and contrast methods and equipment which are used to reduce energy
consumption in buildings.
2. Analyze conventional and alternative energy technologies.
3. Evaluate economic and social factors which influence energy policy and
management decisions.
4. Complete a multidisciplinary research study in a specific area of
energy management.
5. Explain and argue aspects of current environmental issues.
6. Differentiate and critique specific issues in areas of specialization such as
facilities management, equipment assessment, computer applications,
power plant systems and environmental law.
PART TWO: IDENTIFICATION OF MEASURES
The EGMU Vector is obtained as follows:
3 Demonstrates a complete and accurate understanding of the important concepts
Excellent
2 Applies appropriate strategy or concepts with no significant errors
Good
1 Displays an incomplete understanding of the important concepts and has
some notable misconceptions; makes a number of errors when performing
important strategies or skills but can complete a rough approximation of them
Minimal
0 Demonstrates severe misconceptions about the important concepts; makes
many critical errors
Unsatisfactory
A typical EGMU vector for a class with 19 students in which the task was the
third problem of the first exam might be (8, 9, 1, 1) which would signify that 8
students demonstrated a complete and accurate understanding, while 9 students
applied appropriate strategies etc. The average score in this case being 43/19 =
2.26 which is Good.
PART THREE: LEARNING OUTCOMES
A representative set of Learning Outcomes were selected from courses which were
offered in the Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 semesters. These Learning Outcomes are related
to the Program Outcomes which are listed in the parentheses.
Example: ENGY 625, Learning Outcome 3, is related to Program Outcomes 1, 4 and 6.
The asterisk (*) indicates that L.O. #3 is strongly related to P.O. #6.
ENGY 715 ENERGY-EFFICIENT LIGHTING - - Fall 2014
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
2. Assess changes in lighting quality and efficacy. (1, 6*)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Project: Analyze, describe and evaluate case studies of retrofit projects,
highlighting the improvements in the quality and efficacy of new lighting.
EGMU score (3, 4, 1, 0), avg = 2.25
ENGY 750 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW - - FALL 2014
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
4. Discuss the SEQRA process and how it is applied in New York as well as the federal
version, NEPA. (3, 5, 6*)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Final Exam Question: Discuss the SEQRA process in New York. Compare this to
the federal NEPA process.
EGMU score (9, 7, 2, 1), avg = 2.26
ENGY 790 COMPETITIVE ENERGY MARKETS - - FALL 2014
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
4. Describe the purposes of State Public Utility Commissions. (3, 6*)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Paper: Explain how regulations affect the role of State Public Utility
Commissions, using specific examples from several states.
EGMU score (4, 1, 1, 0), avg = 2.50
ENGY 625 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SEMINAR - - SPRING 2015
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
3. Write a Facilities Maintenance Plan. (1, 4, 6*)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Project: Develop a Facilities Maintenance Plan which includes requirements for
preventive maintenance, time estimates, cost estimates, and staffing projections.
EGMU score (9, 9, 3, 0), avg = 2.29
ENGY 730 COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ENERGY MGMT. - - SPRING 2015
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
4. Outline the factors which should be considered before selecting the most appropriate
specialized energy software tool for their firm or client. (3, 6)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Assignment: Identify characteristics which are critical when selecting energy
management software.
EGMU score (7, 2, 0, 1), avg = 2.50
ENGY 795 SMART GRID SYSTEMS - - SPRING 2015
Upon completion of this course, the students will be able to…
3. Compare and contrast Smart Grid information security options. (2, 6*)
This outcome is covered by the following performance task:
Midterm Exam Question: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the major
options for authentication and encryption in Smart Grids.
EGMU score (4, 2, 1, 0), avg = 2.43
PART FOUR: COURSE MODIFICATIONS
The following recommendations from 2013-2014 were implemented:
Modifications to ENGY 610 for 2014-2015:

Provided students with links to websites with photos, product information, and
performance data for typical energy-efficient equipment.

Devoted additional class time to case studies of illumination levels, color
rendition, and lighting retrofits.
Modifications to ENGY 625 for 2014-2015:

Provided students with information about water use in buildings, and case
studies of water conservation measures.

Examined life cycles of building materials and reviewed sources of
information about sustainable products.
Modifications to ENGY 710 for 2014-2015:

Devoted additional class time to small-scale electricity generation options,
including micro-turbines, modular PV and mini-hydro systems.
Modifications to ENGY 890 for 2014-2015:

Scheduled group discussions for peer review and critique of thesis chapters.

Distributed examples of well-constructed thesis project outlines.

Reviewed economic analysis methods which are commonly used for
evaluation of projects and proposals.

Discussed case studies which quantify impacts on air quality, water quality,
wildlife and other environmental factors.
The following recommendations from instructors will be implemented next year:
Modifications to ENGY 715 for 2015-2016:

Provide students with case studies of lighting retrofits, including examples
where upgrades have resulted in improved quality of lighting.

Distribute manufacturer specification data sheets for the most widely used
lamps and fixtures.
Modifications to ENGY 750 for 2015-2016:

Provide students with SEQRA and NEPA reports which were conducted
simultaneously, with summaries of key similarities and differences.
Modifications to ENGY 790 for 2015-2016:

Demonstrate how students can search for PUC rulings and supporting
documentation.
Modifications to ENGY 625 for 2015-2016:

Utilize webinars about issues commonly encountered in facilities, and show
how they are related to a Facilities Management Plan.
Modifications to ENGY 730 for 2015-2016:

Expand coverage of software evaluation and selection, including specific
examples of desirable features for typical applications.
Modifications to ENGY 795 for 2015-2016:

Give examples of how several different authentication and encryption
methods can provide enhanced security for Smart Grids.
PART FIVE: 2014-2015 FOCUS ON PROGRAM OUTCOME #6
Program Outcome #6: Graduates of the M.S. in Energy Management program are
expected to differentiate and critique specific issues in areas of specialization such as
facilities management, equipment assessment, computer applications, power plant
systems and environmental law.
Course #
ENGY 715
ENGY 750
ENGY 790
ENGY 625
ENGY 730
ENGY 795
Name
En. Eff. Lighting
En. Env. Law.
Comp. En. Mkts.
Fac. Mgmt. Sem.
Comp. App. En.
Smart Grid Syst.
Learning Outcome
Lighting Retrofit Case Studies Project
SEQRA and NEPA Exam Question
Public Utility Commissions Paper
Facilities Maintenance Plan Project
Energy Software Selection Assignment
Information Security Exam Question
TOTAL
Avg.
2.25
2.26
2.50
2.29
2.50
2.43
2.37
The benchmark value of (E,G,M,U) on the (3, 2, 1, 0) scale is 2.00 = Good
PART SIX: 2014-2015 ACTION ITEMS IMPLEMENTED
Visit to Site Which Has Power Generation and Waste Handling Equipment:
Representatives of the Babylon Resource Recovery Center in Babylon, NY
demonstrated operation of turbines, pumps, steam generators, solid waste handling
equipment, and control systems during a visit to the site.
Presentations by Industry Experts:
Mr. Andrew N. Vourlos
Lead Market Surveillance Engineer
UL, LLC, Commercial and Industrial
Mr. Mark O'Brien
Facility Manager
Covanta Babylon, Inc.
Mr. Mark W. Thomson
Senior Executive, Business Development
ThinkEco Demand Response, Inc.
Mr. John Culbertson
President, IPLAN Access
Board Member, LISTnet
Mr. Lars Beshaw, LEED GA
Energy Consultant, IESG Energy
Sales Director, Green Ballast, Inc.
Mr. Joseph S. Lopes
Senior Principal Consultant
DNV GL Sustainable Use Consulting
Mr. James M. Rice
Co-Founder and CEO
Nautilus Solar Energy, LLC
Mr. Nick Goldsmith
Sustainability Coordinator, Ithaca, NY
Chair of Board, The Sustainability Center
Ms. Maya Camou, LEED AP BD+C
Founder and Principal, M3D Consulting
Consultant, DSF Office of Sustainability
Conferences and Job Fairs:
International Energy and Sustainability Conference
October 24, 2014, Farmingdale State College
STEAM Job and Internship Fair
October 30, 2014, NYIT Manhattan Campus
HIA-LI Sixth Annual Energy Conference
October 31, 2014, IBEW, Hauppauge, NY
Cradle of Aviation Museum Design Competition
November 1, 2014, Garden City, NY
Cradle of Aviation Museum Career Expo
November 17, 2014, Garden City, NY
All Majors Job and Internship Career Fair
April 2, 2015, NYIT Old Westbury Campus
NYIT Energy Conference: Tipping Points
June 10, 2015, de Seversky Mansion, Old Westbury
Sustainability Leadership Teleconference
June 11, 2015, Old Westbury, Vancouver and Online
PART SEVEN: ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR 2015-2016
The 2015-2016 Action Items have been assigned to the following faculty:

Arrange for a visit to a site which has a solar energy or wind power system
- - Dr. Robert Amundsen and Prof. Greg Banhazl

Arrange for internship opportunities and mentoring for energy and
environmental students. - - Prof. John Eff and Prof. Stanley Greenwald

Prepare a survey of employers in the energy field - - Prof. Sarah Meyland
For the 2015-2016 Academic Year, the following timetable will be followed:
By September 8, 2015, the faculty will meet to discuss this Assessment Plan and
select a Program Outcome which will be the focus for the 2015-2016 year.
By October 15, 2015, instructors of the following Fall 2015 courses will be notified
about the selected Learning Objectives, Measures and Benchmarks for Success:
ENGY 610 Energy Management
ENGY 625 Facilities Management Seminar
ENVT 601 Intro. to Environmental Technology
By January 15, 2016, the FCAR reports must be submitted by the instructors of the
Fall 2015 courses listed above. The results will be distributed to the faculty who
teach those courses so that improvements can be made in future semesters.
By February 15, 2016, instructors of the following Spring 2016 courses will be notified
about the selected Learning Objectives, Measures, and Benchmarks for Success:
ENGY 710 Power Plant Systems
ENGY 750 Energy and Environmental Law
ENGY 775 Alternative Energy Systems
By June 15, 2016, the FCAR reports must be submitted by the instructors of the
Spring 2016 courses listed above. The results will be distributed to the faculty who
teach those courses so that improvements can be made in future semesters.
By June 15, 2016, Employer Survey results will be available. The results will be
distributed to the faculty who teach the relevant courses, so that improvements can be
made in future semesters.
Download