Equality Impact Proforma
1.
State which function you are assessing and identify who should be
involved in the equality impact analysis
Policy/Service Area Selected
Supporting People funded services. It is also linked to the phase 3 saving proposal
AC17 - Supporting People.
What function, policy, procedure or practice is being assessed?
The Adult Care and Support service is transforming the way it delivers services. As
part of this transformation we want to adopt a radical change in the way we deliver
services and support people to achieve and maintain independent living with a range of
effective universal prevention services (for example a floating support service). We
also want to reduce the number of service users needing to access ongoing support
services (for example residential care) in Adult Care.
Whilst we understand that some people will still need to access ongoing services,
where people do so, we want to minimise the time spent in ongoing services by reenabling people and getting them back into universal services. As a consequence the
Council has adopted a ‘zero based’ approach. This means starting again and
assuming that we have no SP services and other relevant Adult Care services and
deciding what housing support services we want to commission in the future.
Our approach to zero basing is to develop a Prevention and Independence
Commissioning strategy. This approach will mean a move away from the ‘Supporting
People’ brand but will need to ensure that the important role of housing support
services in supporting independent living and preventing citizens from accessing more
high cost services continues in those areas identified as a priority. Future services will
be more focussed and they will be commissioned on a strong basis of evidenced need
and demand.
The strategy identifies three key components of a whole system approach to service
delivery:
 Prevention: low level community and universal services that help vulnerable
people to live independently without the need to access Adult Care services.
 Recovery: front door and re- enablement services that support people to return
to independent living without continued support from adult care
 Continued Support Services: services for those individuals who require
ongoing support to maintain independent living.
There will be a prevention element in each area of the whole system i.e. services
within recovery will be aimed at preventing citizens from requiring ongoing support i.e.
The STARS service. (See Adult Care Blueprint for further information)
The strategy also considers the role of wider council services and partners in
preventing citizens from accessing acute services (e.g. community safety and health)
and is closely linked to the corporate work in relation to the ‘Big Society’, Re-building
the council and the work in relation to public health. Working with partners we will
commission high quality services which enable people to live independently with or
without ongoing support from Adult Care
Version2august2011.
1
The Supporting People Programme provides housing related support to a wide range
of vulnerable people. The programme was established in 2003 based on existing
provision. Rochdale had a greater supply than other boroughs. The programme was
initially funded by a Government grant which was ring fenced until 2009/10. In the
Comprehensive Spending Review, Supporting People Grant was rolled up into
Formula Grant and redistributed across the country. Within the context of the
Comprehensive Spending Review, a phase 3 proposal was approved to reduce
funding for the Supporting People programme by 44.52% in line with the reduction in
formula grant. In Rochdale the consequence of this change is that the funding
available for this programme has been cut from £14,797k to £8,210k a reduction of
£6,587k.
The phase 2 savings for the Supporting People Programme achieves ongoing savings
of £1,553k. Taking these into account the cost of the programme needs to be reduced
by £4,909k in 2012/13 to reduce the funding level to £8.2million. .
The proposed different reductions for each client group have been designed to further
the delivery of the adult care blueprint. This is to achieve a number of key objectives in
the context of this proposal:


Seeking efficiencies in contract costs;
A move to achieving outcomes and priorities currently being developed as part
of the Adult Care Prevention and Independence Strategy; and
 A focus on prevention, early intervention and support for self-care will be in a
manner that is more accessible for potential service users, more often in their
own home or at times outside the regular working day.
Who is responsible for it? Council or Other Organisation/Partnership?
Council
What are the aims and objectives of the function, policy, procedure or practice?
In addition to the overarching aim of the strategy ‘which is to improve the health and
wellbeing of the people of Rochdale’ there are five draft outcomes (they will be
reviewed and revised throughout the consultation period). The draft outcomes
consulted upon were based on the ‘Five Ways to Well Being’ document produced by
the New Economics Foundation (2008)1 The research suggested that building the
following five actions into our day-to-day lives is important for well-being. (See
appendix: Five Ways to Well Being). These five outcomes are:
1. Vulnerable People will be connected

People will feel more connected to their neighbourhood and have
networks of social contacts. People will be able to find their own support
solutions and be trained in and have access to IT.
2. Vulnerable People will be active citizens

1
People will access and benefit from accessing leisure services, libraries,
adult learning and mainstream public services. People will also have access
to and benefit from physical exercise (dance, gym and walking)
http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/Five_Ways_to_Well-being_Evidence_1.pdf
Version2august2011.
2
3. Vulnerable People take notice

People will have the opportunity to be involved in arts projects, join walking
groups and read more regularly.
4. Vulnerable People will be able to learn

People will be given the opportunity to learn new skills i.e. literacy, achieve
qualifications or learn for pleasure.
5. Vulnerable People will be able to give

People will have support from/give support to peer support networks, social
networks, timebanks and befriending networks. People will give/receive
support to help in volunteering and employment.
However, these five outcomes are fluid. Through consultation Stakeholders, Partners
and Service Users will be involved in shaping the priority outcomes and services for
the Borough and the development of the strategy.
Who are the key stakeholders?
Key stakeholders include:
 Service Users;
 Carers;
 Providers; and
 Partners.
Please see P&I consultation strategy and analysis for further details.
Lead Officer for this analysis (i.e. service manager who will co-ordinate the EIA)
Joanne Chilton
Others consulted and involved in the analysis (i.e. colleagues/peers/key internal
and external stakeholders)
Please refer to the P&I consultation strategy and analysis
2.
Identify the scope of the equality impact assessment
Please provide a summary of:

What is to be included in this impact assessment/what issues will you consider? i.e.
are all aspects of the policy/service to be covered or is it confined to a limited area?
Please explain. This is likely to reflect the relevance to equality of different aspects.

Does this service/policy have link to other service areas, or other Equality Impact
Assessments?
The current services affected by this proposal are listed in Appendix 7. This Equality
Impact Assessment covers the impact.
Services in Phase 2 (as shown in Appendix 7) may change subject to further
consultation
Version2august2011.
3
3.State the data that you have considered for this assessment and any gaps in data
identified. What action will be taken to close any data gaps?
Although not an exhaustive list, to develop the context and framework for
commissioning future services., the data has been uplifted from:
















A sector-wide commitment to moving forward with personalisation;
Alcohol Strategy 2009-2012;
Carers and personalisation: improving outcomes;
Mental Health Strategy 2010-2013;
Needs Assessment for Mental Health & Wellbeing in Rochdale Borough, 2009;
No Health Without Mental Health;
Older Person’s Strategy 2010-2013;
Planning4care: Learning Disability strategic needs assessment for Rochdale;
Review of the National Carers Strategy Nov 2010;
Rochdale Drugs Needs Assessment 2009-2010;
Rochdale Homelessness Strategy;
Rochdale Supporting People’s review of Older Person’s services. 2009-2010;
Strategic Threat Assessment 2009;
Supporting People Strategy 2008 – 2011;
Transparency in outcomes: a framework for adult social care; and
Valuing People Now.
We have also considered the Comprehensive Spending Review (2011-14), and the
Governments announced plans which aim to break down the barriers between health
and social care funding through new approaches, including re-ablement services
provided by the NHS. It is committed to spending money more effectively by
introducing a more preventative focus across public services to improve the health of
the whole population and particularly pockets of ill-health and health inequalities.
There are also a number of key national strategies that underpin or are associated with
this strategy. Although not exhaustive list, these strategies include:
Independence, Wellbeing and Choice: Our Vision for the Future of Social Care
for Adults in England (2005)
A Department of Health consultation paper setting out proposals for the future direction
of social care for all adults of all age groups in England over the next 10 to 15 years
and how this might be realised.
Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services (2006)
This White Paper sets a new direction for the whole health and social care system. It
confirms the vision set out in the Department of Health Green Paper, Independence,
Well-being and Choice. Its emphasis is on a radical and sustained shift in the way in
which services are delivered, ensuring that they are more personalised and that they fit
into people's busy lives, giving people a stronger voice so that they are the major
drivers of service improvement.
Version2august2011.
4
Putting People First - Transforming Social Care (2007)
Published by the Department of Health, and amplified in ministerial guidance issued in
2008, 2009 and 2010, sets a clear direction for adult social care over the next decade.
Making a strategic shift towards prevention and early intervention is one of the central
objectives of this initiative. There are four key components on which Councils and their
partners should focus to help ensure services become more personalised and achieve
the desired outcomes, namely universal services, early intervention and prevention,
social capital, and choice and control. Putting People First is clear that these areas link
together.
Building the Big Society (2010)
Outlines how citizens, communities and local government should work together to
achieve reforms such as citizens and communities being given more power and
responsibilities to respond to the social, political and economic challenges the country
faces.
Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Transparency in Outcomes (2010)
Aims to achieve three local outcomes for health services
1. Better health and wellbeing for all
2. Better care for all
3. Better value for all
It also states that commissioners should promote services that encourage early
intervention, to avoid unnecessary unplanned admissions. All these reforms require
agreement and a partnership approach between all council services and the local
health economy to share the risks and benefits to the ‘whole system’, with the
involvement of leisure, adult education, transport, employment, healthy living and
health improvement (backed by targeted intervention), along with housing and
supported living options for prevention, intervention and re-ablement services.
4. Assess the impact the policy/service has on equality will reference to different
groups or communities. To do this, consider the questions on page 5 of the
guidance, which relate to unequal outcomes or disadvantage; access barriers;
unmet needs; encouraging participation; fostering good relations. The Equality
Impact Assessment Checklist may also be helpful at this stage.
Appendices
Race Equality
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Disabled People
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
Version2august2011.
5


Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Carers
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Gender
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Older and Younger People
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
People who are Socio-Economically Disadvantaged
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Religion or Belief
Please refer to:
 Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
 Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
 Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend,
gender and BME specific services and disability;
 Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment; and
 Appendix 7- Current Services included in the Prevention Strategy.
Version2august2011.
6
Sexual Orientation
There is no impact on this group that is evidence to date
Gender Reassignment
There is no impact on this group that is evidenced to date
Pregnant Women or Those on Maternity Leave
See Appendices 2,3,5,6 and 7
Marriage or Civil Partnership
There is no impact on this group that is evidenced to date
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
What are the main conclusions from this analysis?
Overall
The proposal will affect all monitored equality groups; there is no current evidence of
any discriminatory effect on any one group. However there are direct effects on all
vulnerable client groups, including women, single homeless, BME groups and people
with disability. These impacts need to be monitored throughout the process to ensure
these and other proposals do not result in unintended consequences. Draft
Commissioning Priorities will need to be changed wherever possible to deliver services
which reduce impact on individuals and the community.
Appendices 1-4 start to show the possible impact on service user units, percentage
spend and reduction of spend by client group, staffing in provider organisations and
buildings. Because the consultation period is still ongoing on these changes and
efficiencies, it is not possible to identify the final impact as yet. In addition, some of the
impact e.g. around buildings and number of service users supported under new
commissioning arrangements will not be fully know before December 2011 when new
services are commissioned.
Please note- all figures and numbers in the Appendices are indicative at present
Changes in funding across vulnerable client groups
Appendix 1 shows the proposed reduction in funding across key client groups as part
of Phase 3 efficiencies which have been funded through the Supporting People
Programme. The overall reduction in Phase 3 is a 36.3% reduction of the 2011/12
spend. Client groups having a lower reduction in efficiencies include LD, where there
will be a statutory duty for some of these service users and the same will apply to a
lesser extent for Mental Health Clients. In addition, because of the complex needs of
numbers of clients within these two groups, the pace of change needs time to fully
consider and respond to client needs. Other client groups with significantly higher
efficiency savings are Substance misuse problems, Single Homeless, Homeless
families, Older People with Dementia and Physical and Sensory.
The Commissioning Manager for older people will be commissioning services for
Dementia and Physical Disabilities and this will be funded through a different AC
funding stream. Further impact assessment on any ending or changes to Physical
Disability services and Dementia services within this strategy will be carried out.
The information in Appendix 5 shows that the percentages of current service users
Version2august2011.
7
who consider themselves to have a disability is significantly higher in services for
Physical Disability, Learning Disability, Older People and Mental Health. This therefore
has to be taken into account when considering the levels of reductions in spend for
Older People, Learning Disability and Mental Health and also the impact on service
users and how their needs can be met within a pace of swift efficiency savings.
Some possible key issues for service users raised as a result of the cuts in funding
linked to this proposal include the following:




















Increased rough sleeping/Displaced people/street homelessness. This may
include some families who could be deemed intentionally homeless which some
SP support services currently work with.
Increased use of Bed and breakfast accommodation
Safeguarding issues, particularly around very vulnerable service users,
including young people and people with Learning disabilities
Increased vulnerability to females, particularly in relation to safeguarding and
access to medical and other services
Increased difficulty in accessing tenancies, particularly for clients whose needs
become more chaotic due to reduced support.
Reduced support for refugees and other BME groups, which may reduce access
to advice and guidance and lead to risks of losing/accessing independent living
and also living in poorer housing conditions
Financial abuse and exploitation of people with learning disabilities
Increased social isolation which will increase vulnerability of people with
learning disabilities and people with mental health issues
With fewer support services, difficulty for the most vulnerable groups, which will
include females, people with learning difficulties, BME groups and more
complex needs, in accessing remaining services
The combination of cuts in this area together with other government changes
eg around welfare may increase the marginalisation of the most vulnerable
groups, which will include families, females and more complex needs
The break up of family units due to lack of support services and move on
tenancies, particularly where families are excluded from Housing lists
Increase in health issues which may become more acute. Many support
services signpost into health services which prevent more acute health issues
Increased self harm, due a number of issues including reduction in support
Increase in crime and re-offending
More people on remand- which will have cost implications for RMBC
Increase in mental health related issues which may become more acute
Increase in substance misuse issues which may become more acute
Increased prostitution/ sex working on the streets and exploitation. Also,
increased grooming of vulnerable females
Increased debt issues which may then lead to exclusions from housing and
other services
Marginalisation of vulnerable groups and increased victimisation
Racial tension due to reduced support for vulnerable people
In addition, the possible impact on the community also covers broader impact on
service users
Version2august2011.
8
Changes in service users supported across client groups
In terms of the impact on the numbers of service users supported, Appendix 3 shows
the information we are predicting at present. It is clear that because of the reduction in
funding, there will be a reduction in service users supported. Some client groups will
see a reduction of 50% in the numbers of service users supported and for these
clients, new services which are being commissioned eg the Central Information,
Access and Assessment Centre for socially excluded groups and Low level Learning
Disability will be key in providing advice, rather than support in accommodation based
services, to these groups. The number of support services for Single Homeless, exoffenders, rough sleepers, refugees and generic services will decrease significantly as
a result of this proposal and this may result in increased issues which are covered in
the section above. Substance misuse services will see around a 13% reduction in
people supported while it is planned that Older People will see an increase in people
supported to reflect the increasing growth in population. The same will apply to
numbers of people supported with a Learning Disability, where efficiencies are needed
but there is a growth in needs and statutory provision needed.
Impact on staffing
Appendix 3 shows an initial impact assessment on staffing, but does not at present
include Learning Disability Providers as work is ongoing on this
The impact on staffing within current provider services is predicted as significant, with
homeless services and drug and alcohol facing the biggest staff reductions.
Impact 0n buildings
Appendix 4 shows the buildings currently housing clients receiving Supporting People
Services. It is likely that the buildings for older person’s services will be largely
unaffected, but for all other client groups, some of the buildings may not be utilised by
future support services. Again, this may not be fully known until December 2011
People with a disability may be affected by this proposal, due regard must be taken of
the duties to these clients.
Impact on the community
The following impact has been highlighted as probable as part of the consultation
process and also from the information we have collected on the impact of efficiencies
to date







Unused buildings and subsequent impact on environment
Increased rough sleeping/Displaced people/street homelessness. This may
include some families who could be deemed intentionally homeless which some
SP support services currently work with.
The break up of family units due to lack of support services and move on
tenancies, particularly where families are excluded from Housing lists
Increase in health issues which may become more acute. Many support
services signpost into health services which prevent more acute health issues
Increase in crime and re-offending
More people on remand- which will have cost implications for RMBC
Loss of employment
Version2august2011.
9


Closure of some local businesses
Increase in non host referrals if providers lose business and house people from
outside the borough. This is becoming an increased risk as consultation
continues, with the likely hood of some current providers continuing to operate if
Supporting People Funding ends, using non host referrals. This is something
the authority that RMBC will have no control of and the risk of increased
deprivation in the borough from this is high.
 Unsettled communities, with increased loss of tenancies/settled accommodation
and abandonment due to reduced support
 Increased squatting
 Increased prostitution/ sex working on the streets and exploitation. Also,
increased grooming of vulnerable females
 Marginalisation of vulnerable groups and increased victimisation
 Racial tension due to reduced support for vulnerable people
What are your recommendations?
Equality objectives and targets to address the unequal impact/unmet
needs/barriers/low participation
Await final impact assessment to conclude the detail. However it is clear that unmet
needs are a risk for certain groups identified above. These and any others identified
as the process continues need to be considered with other services to see if there are
any possible mitigations
Suggested actions to meet those targets
 Work to identify possible alternative uses for buildings;
 Commission future services which lessen the impact on service users as far as
possible, including inclusion services where needed
 Commission using a variety of methods to lessen the impact on service users
and the community;
 Monitor homelessness presentations and any associated increases in costs;
 Encourage providers to work jointly where appropriate with service users to
deliver services;
 Carry out individual impact assessments on services using the documents in
appendix 6 and use this information to understand and accommodate client
needs, wherever possible
 Where possible, avoid issuing a small number of large contracts which will
possibly disadvantage small businesses and third sector groups.
 Work corporately to commission effectively and manage impact, particularly with
RMBC Children’s Commissioning Manager in relation to commissioning
priorities for young people
 Carefully consider how consultation feedback needs to inform/change
commissioning plans, particularly in relation to managing impact ,service
provision for females, people with a disability, young people and BME provision
 Consider safeguarding issues and risks, particularly to the more vulnerable
groups such as people with mental health issues, Learning Disabilities, females
and young people. Also, issues around mixing vulnerabilities
 Consider access issues to services, particularly central services within the draft
commissioning plans and ways of addressing these eg Particularly vulnerable
females, People with Learning Disabilities
 Work jointly with RMBC Strategic Housing and Registered Social Landlords on
Version2august2011.
10
move on plans
6. Consult your stakeholders on the main findings and conclusions of the equality
impact analysis and ask for their comments. State your consultation and inclusion
methodology.
The Consultation and Inclusion Methodology Used
Stakeholders, Partners and Service Users have been involved in identifying the priority
outcomes and services for the Borough and the development of the strategy.
Consultation will be carried out in a consistent and timely manner and use the most
appropriate tools and techniques (dependent on the individual proposal and audience)
to ensure meaningful, reasonable consultation takes place. Consultation will be a fluid
process and the approach may be modified (following relevant feedback) to ensure the
process remains relevant to the target audience.
All stakeholder consultation responses (notes of telephone calls, letters, emails, web
submissions, meeting notes etc) will be given a unique reference number, filed as a
hard copy and recorded on the service database enabling the themes or groups
described within the report to be tracked back to the source document and responder.
This will help maintain a quality assurance process
The consultation will use both qualitative and quantative methods to develop a more
comprehensive evidence base (see appendix A: Consultation Methods). There will be
two phases to the consultation:
Phase 1: Will focus on:
 Identifying the outcomes;
 Identifying the Borough priorities; and
 Identifying service delivery models.
Phase 2: Will focus on the:


The strategy; and
Commissioning relevant services
For detailed information on the consultation methodology, please refer to the P&I
consultation strategy.
7. Produce an impact analysis action plan for 2011/12. Details of this should be
included in your service delivery plan.
8. Equality impact analysis sign off
Name
Joanne Chilton
Position
Head of Strategic
Commissioning
Learning Disabilities and
Vulnerable adults
Version2august2011.
Date
19/08/11
11
Appendices







Appendix 1- Projected Supporting People Spend- current and future;
Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation
services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies;
Appendix 3- Initial Impact assessment on Provider Impact and staffing;
Appendix 4- Initial Impact on buildings;
Appendix 5- Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend, gender
and BME specific services and disability; and
Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessment.
Appendix 7 – Current services within the Strategy
Version2august2011.
12
Appendix 1- Projected Supporting People Spend- current and future
COST COMPARISONS
Primary Client
Phase 2
Group
contract
Value
Learning Disability
£4,691,929.00
Phase 3
contract Value
Accommodatio
n
£3,542,650.88
Single Homeless,
Offenders etc
£2,389,857.00
£480,000.00
Older People, Frail
Elderly
£1,563,133.00
Mental Health
Problems
Phase 3
contract
Value Non
Accomm
£147,610.44
Phase 3
Contract
Value Total
%
Reduction
Comments
£3,690,261.12
21.35%
£1 Million reduction
overall
£300,000.00
£780,000.00
67.36%
Newly commissioned
services
£649,808.18
£172,733.62
£822,542.00
47.39%
20% reduction
sheltered & other
reductions
£1,515,,355.0
0
£700,000.00
£379,554.71
£1,079,554.71
28.77%
Young People at
Risk/Leaving care
£617,016.00
£241,870.00
£103,659.00
£345,529.00
44.00%
Possible transfer to
Childrens 70/30 split
Homeless Families
£449,440.00
£180,000.00
£20,000.00
£200,000.00
55.50%
Support to statutory
provision
Domestic Violence
£448,256.00
£160,000.00
£70,000.00
£230,000.00
48.69%
Newly commissioned
services
Version2august2011.
£500k reduction 70/30
split across acc/non
acc
13
Substance Misuse
Problems
£531,269.00
£110,000.00
£100,000.00
£210,000.00
60.47%
Newly commissioned
services
Teenage Parents
services
£341,841.00
£180,000.00
£60,000.00
£240,000.00
29.79%
Newly commissioned
services
Older People with
Dementia
£196,645.26
£0.00
£0.00
£0.00
100.0%
To be covered by PD
commissioning
Physical/Sensory
Disability
£74,687.06
£0.00
£0.00
£0.00
100.0%
To be covered by OP
commissioning
CENTRAL ACCESS
£0.00
£0.00
£150,000.00
£150,000.00
BEFRIENDING
£0.00
£0.00
£75,000.00
£75,000.00
NEW GENERIC
SERVICES
Service across client
groups
+100%
Service across client
groups
+100%
MOVE ON
£0.00
£0.00
£200,000.00
£200,000.00
SOCIAL NETWORK
£0.00
£0.00
£50,000.00
£50,000.00
Service across client
groups
+100%
Service across client
groups
+100%
SHORT TERM
REABLEMENT
£0.00
£0.00
£100,000.00
Service across client
groups
£100,000.00
+100%
TOTAL
£12,820,028.00
£6,244,329.06
£1,928,557.77
Version2august2011.
£8,172,886.83
36.25%
14
Appendix 2- Percentage SP spend on accommodation and non accommodation services before and after Phase 3 efficiencies
(Because of the consideration on Impact, the % of accommodation based services has increased in some areas after Phase 3. However,
because of the efficiencies, the amount of spend has significantly fallen and the number of services reduced. In the new generic services
to be commissioned, in line with the Adult Care Blueprint, these are likely to be lower level non accommodation based support.
Primary Client Group
People with Learning Disabilities
Phase 2
%
ACCOMMODATION
Phase 2
% NON
ACCOMMODATION
Phase 3
%
ACCOMMODATION
Phase 3
% NON
ACCOMMODATION
96.0%
4.0%
96.0%
4.0%
61.7%
38.3%
61.5%
38.3%
61.4%
38.6%
79.8%
20.2%
67.9%
32.1%
70.0%
30.0%
68.5%
31.5%
70.0%
30.0%
61.2%
38.8%
90.0%
10.0%
37.3%
62.7%
69.6%
30.4%
81.5%
18.5%
52.4%
47.6%
69.1%
30.9%
75.0%
25.0%
0.0%
100.0%
n/a
n/a
92.2%
7.8%
n/a
n/a
Single Homeless ETC
Older people with support
needs/Frail Elderly
People with Mental Health
Problems
Young People at Risk/Leaving Care
Homeless Families with Support
Needs
Women at Risk of Domestic
Violence
People with Drug/Alcohol Problems
Teenage Parents
Older people with dementia
People with a Physical or Sensory
Disability
Version2august2011.
15
GENERIC SERVICES
CENTRAL ACCESS
BEFRIENDING
MOVE ON
SOCIAL NETWORK
SHORT TERM REABLEMENT
Grand Total
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
74.6%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
25.4%
Version2august2011.
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
77.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
22.6%
16
Appendix 3- PROVIDER IMPACT BY CLIENT GROUP
Services provided by RMBC highlighted in blue italics
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CQRRENT
SERVICES
Women at
Risk of
Domestic
Violence
Rochdale
Women’s
Refuge
Refuge
Rochdale
Women’s
Refuge
DV Total
Floating
Support
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
12
5.5
New commissioned
DV Accommodation
Service
16
2.3
Floating Support
service B
DV Floating
Support
20
1.5
RIADVF
20
2
WHAG
BME Floating
Support
Befriending
service
25
1.5
Barnardos
RMBC
Safer Homes
16
0
5 providers
6 services
109
12.8
Version2august2011.
2 services (one
combined with
Teenage Parents)
NEW UNITS
(approx)
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
12
5
30
2
42
7
17
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
Single
Homeless,
Offenders,
Rough
Sleepers,
Refugees,
generic
Barnardos
Resettlement
Bond Board
BB Floating
Support
Depaul UK
Outside Link
Service
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
41
3
New commissioned
Homeless service
62
5.7
New commissioned
Crisis Complex
40
4.3
service
Rochdale
Petrus
Long Street
10
4.7
Rochdale
Petrus
Petrus Floating
Supporting
50
5.5
Rochdale
Petrus
Petrus Rough
Sleepers
10
5.3
RMBC
Homelessness
Community Link
FS
30
2
RMBC
Homelessness
Homeless
Prevention
30
2
RMBC
Homelessness
Refugee
Resettlement
45
3
Version2august2011.
Floating Support
service A
NEW UNITS
(approx)
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
40
10
12
6
136
10
18
TOTAL
RMBC
Homelessness
Leopold Court
Stepping
Stone
27
12.8
Redfearn
House
16
2.7
Stepping
Stone
Ashburn House
13
2.7
Stepping
Stone
Parkside House
14
2.3
Stepping
Stone
S Stone
Floating Supp
45
3
The Salvation
Army
Providence
House
50
11
Threshold
Housing
Project
GMOP (cross
authority)
2
n/a
WHAG
Rose Court
16
3.5
WHAG
Whag Floating
Support
37
3.2
9 providers
18 services
538
76.7
Version2august2011.
5 services
188
26
19
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
Teenage
Parents
Action for
Children
Gabriel Court
Action for
Children
Floating
Support
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
12
6.28
New commissioned
Teenage Parents
Accommodation
20
5.2
Scheme
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
12
6
30
2
6
1.2
Floating Support
service B
2 services (one
combined with DV)
Contribution to
Statutory services
42
8
33
4
1 service
33
4
Action for
Children
Pre Tenancy
Floating
Support
TOTAL
1 provider
3 services
38
12.7
Homeless
Families
RMBC
Homelessness
Great Howarth
33
10.5
Shelter
Shelter
Inclusion
Project
36
5.5
2 providers
2 services
69
16
TOTAL
NEW UNITS
(approx)
Version2august2011.
20
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
Substance
Misuse
services
Acorn
Stepping
Stone
CURRENT
SERVICES
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
Redwood
5
3.8
New commissioned
Substance Misuse
Accommodation
Alcohol Floating
20
2.6
Scheme
Support
Floating Support
Halsall House
13
8
service C
NEW UNITS
(approx)
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
20
3.5
45
3.5
65
7
0
0
The Sanctuary
Trust
The Sanctuary
Trust
Turning Point
Sanctuary
Floating Supp
16
1
Westcliffe
House
5 providers
21
5.3
75
20.7
2 services
To be covered by
Physical Disability
commissioning
TOTAL
4 providers
Physical
Sensory
Disability
Respite NW
Floating
Support
2
0.3
Leonard
Cheshire
Warren Close
5
2
2 provider
2 service
7
2.3
TOTAL
Version2august2011.
0 services
21
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
Older
People with
Dementia
TOTAL
Pennine Care
NHS Trust
Rochdale Merit
Service
1 provider
1 service
Young
People at
risk/Leaving
Care
CANW
Supported
lodgings
10
n/a
Depaul UK
Statham House
8
7
RMBC
Supported
Lodgings
Young People
service
14
n/a
18 plus service
14
3
16-17 years
service
2
0.4
5 services
48
10.5 +
RMBC Young
People Sup
Team
TOTAL
RMBC Young
People Sup
Team
4 providers
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
45
6
To be covered by
Older People
commissioning
45
6
0 services
Version2august2011.
NEW UNITS
(approx)
0
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
0
TO BE DECIDED
POSSIBLE
TRANSFER OF
FUNDING TO
CHILDRENS
SERVICES
Pending decisions of
RMBC Children’s
Services
Commissioners
Pending
Pending
decisions of
decisions of
RMBC
RMBC
Children’s
Children’s
Services
Services
Commissioners Commissioners?
22
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
People with
Mental
Health
Problems
Creative
Support
Haweswater
Creative
Support
Howard Place
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
3
0.3
Due to the high
impact on people in
these services, all
existing Supporting
People mental health
13
4
providers are
working on a
proposal to provide
5
0.9
the outcomes and
efficiencies needed
from RMBC through
15
1.9
the Mental Health
Panel. If this is
accepted, this area
11
1.7
of commissioning
would be exempt
11
1.1
from tendering
Creative
Support
Union St
Creative
Support
Floating
Support
Making Space
Hope Court
Making Space
Floating
Support
Newbarn
Floating
Support
18
6
Next Step
Next Step
13
2
People First
Asian Women
Floating Supp
38
4.7
North Floating
8
0.5
RMBC
Community
Version2august2011.
NEW UNITS
(approx)
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
23
Restart Team
Support
RMBC
Community
Restart Team
South Floating
Support
32
2.3
North
Accommodation
Based
25
5.8
South
Accommodation
based
28
8
Rochdale
Petrus
Beswicke
Royds Street
14
3.7
Rochdale
Petrus
Falinge Road
10
4.7
Rochdale
Petrus
Ruth House
7
1.1
Together
Floating
Support
36
4.9
8 providers
17 services
287
53.6
RMBC
Community
Restart Team
RMBC
Community
Restart Team
TOTAL
Version2august2011.
Pending the result of
negotiations
Pending the
result of
negotiations
Pending the
result of
negotiations
24
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
Older
People
Anchor Trust
8 services
Ashiana
1 service
Contour
11 services
Guinness NC
7 services
Housing 21
2 services
Johnnie
Johnson
1 service
Riverside
English
Churches
3 services
RMBC
Strategic
Housing
28 services
921
Assisted
Technology and
HIA
1000
RMBC HIA
St Vincent’s
6 services
191
West Pennine
8 services
85
11 Providers
77 Services
TOTAL
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
NEW UNITS
UNITS
STAFF
(approx)
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
220
Due to the high
impact on people in
3
these services, all
existing Supporting
279
People Sheltered
and Category 1
181
providers are
working on a
93
proposal to provide
the outcomes and
45
efficiencies needed
from RMBC . If this is
accepted, this area
40
of commissioning
would be exempt
from tendering
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
3058
Version2august2011.
25
CLIENT
GROUP
CURRENT
PROVIDERS
CURRENT
SERVICES
People with
Learning
Disabilities
Rochdale
Gateway
Inclusion (FS)
RMBC
Learning
Disabilities
Respite North
West (FS)
TOTAL
Supported
Placements
(AB)
CURRENT CURRENT NEW SERVICES
UNITS
STAFF
NUMBERS
(full time
equivalent)
25
Being
Inclusion Service (FS)
assessed
10
Enablement Service
(FS)
NEW UNITS
(approx)
NEW STAFF
NUMBERS
(approx)
Being
assessed
Being assessed
To be assessed
To be assessed
Supported Placements
(AB)
Floating
Support
7 Supported
living services
which are part
of the LD
Project outside
of this strategy
but will
contribute
approx 1m to
the savings
within this
project
10 Providers
10 Services (3
within this
strategy)
30
Contribution towards
social
networking/befriending
service
Contribution to central
information and
access service
Continuation of the
Supported Living
Services with reduced
funding
65 (for
those
included
within
this
strategy)
To be
assessed
Version2august2011.
To be assessed
26
Appendix 4- Initial Impact on buildings at risk
Please note this doesn’t currently include building used for Learning Disabilities
RMBC Provider or RMBC building highlighted in red
Provider Name
Numb
er of
Units
Service Name
Client group
Landlord
Area/Towns
hip
Turning Point
Westcliffe House
13
Alcohol
Guinness Northern Counties Rochdale
Acorn
Redwood House
8
Drug
Acorn
Rochdale
The Sanctuary Trust
Halsall House
13
Great Places
Rochdale
Rochdale Womens Refuge
RMBC Homelessness
section
Women's Refuge
12
Drug
Domestic
Violence
Regenda
Rochdale
Great Howarth
33
Families
RMBC
Rochdale
Anchor Trust
Pendleton Croft - Cat 2.5
24
Frail Elderly
Anchor Trust
Heywood
Stepping Stone
Redfearn House
16
Generic
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Creative Support
Haweswater Mews
3
Mental Health
Contour Housing
Middleton
Creative Support
Howard Place
13
Mental Health
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Creative Support
Union Street
5
Mental Health
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Making Space
Hope Court
11
Mental Health
Regenda
Rochdale
Newbarn Limited
Newbarn Service
18
Mental Health
Newbarn
Castleton
Next Step
RMBC Community Restart
Team
RMBC Community Restart
Team
Next Step Service
North Team Accommodation
Base`
South Team Accommodation
Based
13
Mental Health
Boroughwide
25
Mental Health
28
Mental Health
Next Step
Contour / Regenda / St
Vincent's
Contour / Regenda / St
Vincent's
Rochdale Petrus Community Falinge Road
10
Mental Health
Contour Housing
Rochdale
Rochdale Petrus Community Ruth House
7
Mental Health
Regenda
Rochdale
Version2august2011.
Boroughwide
Boroughwide
27
Rochdale Petrus Community Beswick Royds Street
Leonard Cheshire (North
West)
Durnford Street
RMBC Homelessness
section
Leopold Court
14
Mental Health
5
Contour Housing
Middleton
RMBC
Rochdale
Rochdale Petrus Community Long Street
10
Contour Housing
Middleton
Stepping Stone
Parkside House
14
Regenda
Middleton
Stepping Stone
Women's Housing Action
Group (WHAG)
Ashburn House
13
Regenda / RMBC
Heywood
Rose Court
16
St Vincent's
Castleton
Action For Children
Gabriel Court
12
Physical Dis
Single
Homeless
Single
Homeless
Single
Homeless
Single
Homeless
Single
Homeless
Teenage
Parents
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Depaul Trust
Statham House
7
Young People
St Vincent's
Rkchdale
Anchor Trust
42
Older people
Anchor Trust
Rochdale
46
Older people
Anchor Trust
Heywood
29
Older people
Anchor Trust
Heywood
0
Older people
Anchor Trust
Rochdale
Anchor Trust
Ashcroft House - OPSN - Cat 2
Brackenhall Court - OPSN Cat 2
Bridgewood Lodge - OPSN Cat 2
Pembroke Court - OPSN - Cat
2
Howarth Farm Way - OPSN Cat 1
22
Older people
Anchor Trust
Rochdale
Anchor Trust
Millfield - OPSN - Cat 1
14
Older people
Anchor Trust
Heywood
Anchor Trust
23
Older people
Anchor Trust
Castleton
Anchor Trust
Street Lodge - OPSN - Cat 1.5
Willie Edwards Fold - OPSN Cat 1
20
Older people
Anchor Trust
Littleborough
Contour Housing
Avro Court - OPSN - Cat 2
40
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Cobden Lodge - OPSN - Cat 2
39
Older people
Version2august2011.
Contour Housing
Castleton
Anchor Trust
Anchor Trust
Anchor Trqst
27
Rochdale
28
Contour Housing
D'Oliveira Court - OPSN - Cat
2
45
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Hanover Street - OPSN - Cat 2
10
Older people
Contour Housing
Castleton
Contour Housing
39
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Mayburn Close - OPSN - Cat 2
St. Gabriels Court - OPSN Cat 2
29
Older people
Contour Housing
Castleton
Contour Housing
Westhill, Castle Avenue Cat 2
20
Older people
Contour Housing
Rochdale
Contour Housing
Woods Court - OPSN - Cat 2
32
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Damson Green - OPSN - Cat 1
8
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Pershore Road - OPSN - Cat 1
10
Older people
Contour Housing
Middleton
Contour Housing
Thistle Green - OPSN - Cat 1
7
Older people
Contour Housing
Rochdale
Guinness Northern Counties
Cherwell Court - OPSN - Cat 2
34
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Heywood
Guinness Northern Counties
Iveagh Court - OPSN - Cat 1
34
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Rochdale
Guinness Northern Counties
30
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Heywood
Guinness Northern Counties
Roeacre Court - OPSN - Cat 2
Undsworth Court - OPSN - Cat
2
36
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Heywood
Guinness Northern Counties
Lyndene Court - OPSN - Cat 1
22
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Heywood
Guinness Northern Counties
Platt Close - OPSN - Cat 1
3
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Milnrow
Guinness Northern Counties
The Orchards - OPSN - Cat 1
22
Older people
Guinness Northern Counties Heywood
Housing 21
56
Older people
Housing 21
Heywood
Housing 21
Corcoran Close -Cat 1 and 2
Ian Fraser Court - OPSN - Cat
2
37
Older people
Housing 21
Rochdale
Johnnie Johnson Housing
Portal Court - OPSN _ Cat 2
45
Older people
Johnnie Johnson Housing
Middleton
Riverside ECHG
Hutton House - OPSN - Cat 2
18
Older people
Riverside ECHG
Rochdale
Riverside ECHG
Park Court - OPSN - Cat 2
Shepherd Court - OPSN - Cat
2
2
Older people
Riverside ECHG
Rochdale
20
Older people
Riverside ECHG
Rochdale
Riverside ECHG
Version2august2011.
29
RMBC Strategic Housing
Alkrington Court
23
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Arnold Bagnall Court
29
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Ashfield House
24
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Barnett Court
39
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Chisholm Court
39
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Clough Court
28
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Derrick Walker Court
28
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Falinge Mews
38
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Fieldway
52
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Isherwood Close
18
Older people
RBH
Heywood
RMBC Strategic Housing
Jack McCann Court
44
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Lindum Court
28
Older people
RBH
Heywood
RMBC Strategic Housing
Lonsdale Court
32
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Low Bank
40
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Moss Row
30
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Mountside View
30
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Norman Weall Court
41
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Olive Standring House
26
Older people
RBH
Littleborough
RMBC Strategic Housing
Ravendale
59
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Ryfields
40
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Saxon House
16
Older people
RBH
Littleborough
RMBC Strategic Housing
Sherrif Street
45
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
RMBC Strategic Housing
Springfield Close
23
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Thistleyfield
53
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
Version2august2011.
30
RMBC Strategic Housing
Phrelkeld
30
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
Tonge Court
32
Older people
RBH
Middleton
RMBC Strategic Housing
West View
26
Older people
RBH
Littleborough
RMBC Strategic Housing
Yew Court
Alice Ingham Court - OPSN Cat 2
32
Older people
RBH
Rochdale
34
Older people
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Hurst Street - OPSN - Cat 1
Khubsuret House - OPSN - Cat
2
6
Older people
St Vincent's
Rochdale
33
Older people
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Lisbon Street - OPSN - Cat 1
Margaret Ward Court - OPSN Cat 2
16
Older people
St Vincent's
Rochdale
29
Older people
St Vincent's
Rochdale
Pennine View - OPSN - Cat 2
Belfield Road/Waterman View
Cat 1
26
Older people
Regenda
Rochdale
12
Older people
Regenda
Rochdale
Clarkes Lane - OPSN - Cat 1
Copeland Close - OPSN - Cat
1
4
Older people
Regenda
Rochdale
5
Older people
Regenda
Middleton
4
Older people
Regenda
Middleton
10
Older people
Regenda
Heywood
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
Grasmere Walk - OPSN - Cat 1
Grassington Drive - OPSN Cat 1
Jack Taylor Court - OPSN Cat 1
12
Older people
Regenda
Rochdale
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
The Bakery - OPSN - Cat 1
12
Older people
Regenda
Littleborough
St Vincent's HA
St Vincent's HA
St Vincent's HA
St Vincent's HA
St Vincent's HA
West Pennine HA
(Regenda)
West Pennine HA
(Regenda)
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
West Pennine HA(Regenda)
TOTAL
2366
Version2august2011.
31
Version2august2011.
32
Appendix 5: Breakdown of current Supporting People Services by spend, gender
and BME specific services and disability
EQUALITY IMPACT INFORMATION
NUMBER OF SERVICES
There are a total of 121 services after Phase 2 changes. This will reduce to 120 in October
when the SP funding for POPPs ceases.
NUMBER OF UNITS KF SUPPORT
There are approximately 4744 contracted units of support after Phase 2 changes.
BREAKDOWN BY TYPE OF SUPPORT (SPEND AND CONTRACTED UNITS)
Accommodation
Based Service
Floating
Support Service
Community
Alarm Service
Home
Improvement
Agency
TOTAL
UNITS
% OF UNITS
SPEND
% OF SPEND
2670
56.28%
£
9,372,878.67
73.53%
999
21.06%
£
3,013,337.54
23.64%
959
20.22%
£
304,129.56
2.39%
116
2.45%
£
57,407.15
0.45%
4744
100.00%
£
12,747,752.92
100.00%
BREAKDOWN BY GENDER SPECIFIC (SPEND & CONTRACTED UNITS)
NON GENDER SPECIFIC
FEMALE ONLY SERVICES
MALE ONLY SERVICES
TOTAL
UNITS
4523
188
% OF UNITS
SPEND
% OF SPEND
95.36%
£11,056,970.29
86.74%
3.94%
£1,169,257.79
9.17%
33
0.69%
£521,524.84
4.09%
4744
100.00%
£12,747,752.92
100.00%
BREAKDOWN BY BME SPECIFIC (SPEND AND CONTRACTED UNITS)
NON BME SPECIFIC
SERVICES
UNIT
S
% OF
UNITS
4616
128
97.30%
2.70%
Version2august2011.
SPEND
£12,380,462.3
6
£367,290.56
% OF
SPEND
97.12%
2.88%
33
BME SPECIFIC SERVICES
4744
100.00%
TOTAL
£12,747,752.9
2
100.00%
DISABILITY
The data from Client Record information shows that from 2724 new users of Supporting
People services in 2010-11 overall 27% considered themselves to have a disability. The
data for Rochdale is similar over the last few years and is very similar to the national
average. Please note that the data does not include sheltered housing as they do not
complete client record returns.
This can be broken down by the primary need of the number of users who consider
themselves to have a disability.
CLIENT GROUP
Frail elderly
Physical or sensory disability
Learning disabilities
Older people mental health_82.4%
Mental health problems
Older people with support needs
Traveller
Alcohol problems
Mentally disordered offenders
Single homeless with support needs
People at risk of domestic violence
Generic/Complex needs
Young people at risk
Drug problems
Offenders/at risk of offending
Rough Sleeper
Homeless families with support needs
Young people leaving care
Refugees
People with HIV/AIDS
Teenage parents
% OF NEW USERS
WHO CONSIDERED
THEMSELVES TO
HAVE A DISABILITY
100.0%
90.9%
88.8%
Version2august2011.
64.4%
58.4%
50.0%
30.0%
25.0%
21.9%
16.6%
15.6%
11.8%
11.1%
9.1%
6.7%
5.3%
4.2%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
34
Appendix 6- Service Specific Impact Assessments
The following Impact assessments are being used to gather information about SP
funded services
END OF CONTRACT IMPACT ASSESSMENT
PROVIDER:
SERVICE:
General Service User Impact
Equal Opportunities
race equality, disabled people, gender, age
Stakeholders/Referring Agencies Impact/ Out of Borough Referrals
Landlord/Building/Tenancy issues
Version2august2011.
35
Provider Staff Impact
Provider Organisation Impact
Other Funding/ Consultation with Other Funding Partners
Cost Implications of Service Closure
Legal impact/ Political Impact
Has an Exit Plan/Strategy for the service been drafted?
Version2august2011.
36
Service User Profile for each SP service
Service Name
Date of completion
Completed by
Service Age Gender Ethnicity FACS Level
Is the
user
(if
service
applicable/known) user deaf
or
disabled?
If yes,
please
specify
1
2
3
Version2august2011.
Does the
service user
have a caring
responsibility
for others?
Current
length
of stay
in
service
37
Ap
pla
mo
da
Appendix 7- Current Services within the Strategy
PHASE 1 SERVICES
Older People
Guinness Northern Counties
Ashiana
RMBC Home Improvement Agency
(Housing Services)
St Vincent’s Housing Association
West Pennine Housing Association
Anchor Trust
Contour Housing Association
Riversi`e English Churches
Guinness Northern Counties
Iveagh Court - Cat 1
Lyndene Court
Platt Close - Cat 1
The Orchards - Cat 1
Community Alarm
Careline Service
Home Improvement Agency
Support at Home Responder Service
Hurst Street – Cat 1
Lisbon Street – Cat 1
Mainstay Floating Support
Belfield Road/Waterman View
Clarkes Lane – Cat 1
Copeland Close – Cat 1
Grasmere Walk – Cat 1
Grassington Drive – Cat 1
Jack Taylor Court – Cat 1
The Bakery – Cat 1
Pennine View – CAT 2
Howarth Farm Way – Cat 1
Millfield – Cat 1
Willie Edwards Fold – Cat 1
Street Lodge
Ashcroft House
Brackenhall Court
Bridgewood Lodge
Pendleton Croft
Avro Court
Damson Green – Cat 1
Pershore Road – Cat 1
Thistle Green – Cat 1
Cobden Lodge
D'Oliveira Court
Hanover Street
Mayburn Close
St Gabriel's Courts
Westhill
Woods Court
Hutton House
Park Court
Shepherd Court
Cherwell Court
Undsworth Court
Roeacre Court
Version2august2011.
38
Housing 21
Corcoran Close
Ian Fraser Court
Portal Court
Johnnie Johnson Housing
RMBC Sheltered Housing
St Vincent’s Housing Association
Pennine Care NHS Trust (Rochdale
Merit Service)
Physical/Sensory Disability
Leonard Cheshire
Respite NW
Alkrington Court
Arnold Bagnall Court
Ashfield House (Decommission Sept
2011)
Barnett Court
Chisholm Court
Clough Court
Derrick Walker Court
Falinge Mews
Fieldway
Isherwood Close
Jack McCann Court
Lindum Court
Lonsdale Court
Low Bank
Moss Row
Mountside View
Norman Weall Court
Olive Standring Hkuse
Ravendale
Ryfields
Saxon House
Sherrif Street
Springfield Close
Thistleyfield
Threlkeld
Tonge Court
West View
Yew Court
Alice Ingham Court
Khubsuret House
Margaret Ward Court
MERIT Floating Support
Durnford St
Physical/Sensory Disability Floating
Support
Learning Disability
Rochdale Gateway
Creative Engagement Scheme
Respite North West
LD Floating Support
RMBC Supported Placement Scheme LD Service
Version2august2011.
39
Mental Health
Rochdale Petrus Community
Creative Support
Making Space
Newbarn Limited
Next Step Supported Housing Limited
People First
RMBC Community Restart Team
Together Working for Wellbeing
Socially Excluded
Action for Children
Barnardos
Bond Board
Child Action North West
Depaul Trust
RMBC Home Improvement Agency
(Housing Services)
RMBC Homelessness section
Falinge Road
River Street
Ruth House
Creative Support Floating Support
Haweswater Mews
Howard Place
Townley Street
Union Street
Hope Court
Making Space Floating Support
Newbarn Service
Next Step Service
Asian Women's Service
North Team Accommodation Based
North Team Floating Support
South Team Accommodation Based
South Team Floating Support
Together Floating Support
Pre tenancy support
Tenancy support
Gabriel Court
Befriending service
Floating Support
Teenage Parents Suppkrted
Placements
Substance Misuse Supported
Placements
YPR service Supported Placements
Outside Link
Safer Homes
Community
Link
Great Howarth
Homeless
Prevention
Leopold Court
Resettlement
RMBC Supported Placement Scheme Refugee
YP Service
RMBC Young People's Support Team 16-17 Year Old Young Homeless
People
Care Leavers
Rochdale Boroughwide Housing
Community Management Service
(RBH)
(Service ending as part of phase 2
efficiency savings).
Rochdale Inter Agency Domestic
Domestic Violence Outreach Service
Violence Forum
Rochdale Petrus Community
Greave House (Service ending as
part
phase 2 efficiency savings).
LongofStreet
Petrus
Rough Outreach
Sleepers & Floating Support
Rochdale Womens Refuge
Women's Refuge
Women's Refuge Floating Support
Depaul Trust
Statham House
Version2august2011.
40
Shelter
Stepping Stone
Shelter Inclusion Project
Ashburn
House
HousingasCrisis
ending
part of
Support
phase (Service
2 efficiency
savings).
Parkside
House
Redfearn House
Stepping
Stone
Floating Support
Providence
House
16-17 yr Olds Nightstop (Service
ending as part of phase 2 efficiency
savings)
Greater Manchester Offenders'
Project
The Salvation Army
The Sanctuary Trust
Threshold Housing Project
Women's Housing Action Group
(WHAG)
Barnardos
Drug and Alcohol
BME
Rose Floating
Court Support
WHAG Floating Support
Resetttlement service
110 Clement Royds Street
St Edmunds Charity in Association
with host rehab centre Ltd
87 Clement Royds Street
(Services ending as part of phase 2
efficiency savings).
Halsall House
The Sanctuary Trust
Sanctuary Trust Floating Support
Stepping Stone
Turning Point
Acorn
Stepping Stone Alcohol Floating
Support
Turning Point Middleton (Service
ending as part of phase 2 efficiency
savings).
Westcliffe House
SP Redwood House
PHASE 2 SERVICES
Carers
The Carers Association
Gateway Leisure
Aashiyana Carers
Saturday Respite
Single sex service
Harelands
Carers Resource
Outreach
End of life care
Young Carers Mental Health
Family Action (Young Carers
Generic)
Substance Misuse
Making Space
Carers breaks
Version2august2011.
41
Friends of Older Parent Carers
In-house support, advice and training
service for carers
Carers Resource
Service User
Involvement/Support/Advice
Informal group providing carer peer
support
Service user group
Kickstart
People Supporting People
Links project
Rochdale & Heywood Citizen
Advocacy
DP4LR
Rochdale Borough wide User Forum
Service User Group for Mental Health
MIND
Older People's Advocacy
User Group for Physical Disability
RADDAG
Older People Service User Groups
Service Users/Carers Action Forum
Pensioners Association
Older People
Disabled Employers Group/ Direct
payments Forum
Drug and Alcohol Service User Group
Voices for Wellbeing
Health and Wellbeing Forum
All Groups
All Groups
Older People
Review of MIND Services
Statutory function on behalf of both
LA and PCT
Not all for advocate, most for direct
services to secondary care users
MIND IMCA Advocacy
MIND Advocacy
Socially Excluded
George House Trust
Other
RELATE
Older People
Bangladesh Association Community
Project
Castlemere Community Centre
KYP APNAR GHAR Elders Centre
Pakistani Welfare Association
POPPS
POPPS Outreach service
Version2august2011.
42
Age Concern
Day Care Loc (Asian Ladies)
Day Care Loc (Falinge Mews)
Day Care Loc (Pendleton Croft)
Day Care Loc (Saxon House)
Friendly Visitor Scheme
Handy Persons Scheme
Version2august2011.
43