FRACTIONAL CRYSTALLISATION-THE FAT MODIFICATION PROCESS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Ralph E. Timms Consultant – Oils & Fats, Nocton, Lincoln, UK [Republished with copyright permission of European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, original reference: Timms RE (2005) Fractional crystallisation – the fat modification process for the 21st century. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 107:48-57. Dol: 10.1002/ejlt.200401075] Abstract: The historical development of fractionation, from the use of fractionated tallow in Mège-Mouriès’ margarine to the modern dry fractionation process used to produce steep-melting palm fractions for cocoa butter equivalents, is described. The principles of fractionation by fractional crystallisation are explained. The fractionation process is carried out in two stages: firstly, a crystallisation stage; secondly, a separation stage. Crystallisation may be effected without any solvent (dry fractionation) or in the presence of a solvent. It can be shown that the efficiency of separation of triglycerides is more or less independent of the solvent so that dry fractionation is, in principle, capable of giving as good a fractionation as solvent fractionation. However, separation of the solid phase (crystals) from the liquid phase is easier in the presence of a solvent, which dilutes the oil and lowers the viscosity. It is mainly developments in separation over the last 25 years that have led to the improved effectiveness of dry fractionation so that it can achieve results that rival solvent fractionation. The concept of ‘entrainment’ is explained with reference to the different separation methods and to their different efficiencies. Today, hydrogenation is in decline, due to nutritional concerns about trans fatty acids and to environmental concerns about nickel catalysts and their disposal. Increasingly, oils with reduced linolenic acid (C18:3) can be produced agriculturally so that stable frying oils may be produced without hydrogenation. With the decline in hydrogenation, interesterification has seen a renaissance, although it is only partially able to replace hydrogenation. Additionally, interesterification suffers from the ‘chemical’-process image and environmental drawbacks of hydrogenation. Fractionation is a purely physical process which satisfies today’s increasing environmental and health concerns. It is the main modification process used for palm oil, whose production is still increasing rapidly and which is likely to become the world’s most-produced oil within 10 years. If hydrogenation is to be avoided, then only palm stearins can supply the higher solid fat content components required to produce the margarines and shortenings essential to produce the bread, pastries and cakes we like to eat. Fractionation is therefore set to become the dominant modification process of the 21st century. Keywords: Fractionation, crystallisation, palm, hydrogenation, separation. 1. Historical background Fractional crystallisation, usually known simply as fractionation, is undoubtedly the oldest fat modification process and was the foundation of the modern edible-oil and fat-processing industry. On 15 July 1869, Hippolyte Mège-Mouriès applied for the French patent number 86480 entitled: “Demande d’un brevet d’invention de quinze ans pour la production de certains corps gras d’origine animale”, that is: Application for a patent of fifteen years for the production of certain fats of animal origin”. The patent was granted in October 1869. The product was what we know today as margarine. MègeMouriès had been working at the Imperial farm at Faisanderie in Vincennes. The French emperor, Napoleon III, had offered a prize to anyone who could produce a cheap substitute for butter. He wanted to improve the diet of his people, and particularly his soldiers, to strengthen France for the impending war with Germany. Having observed that the fasting cows still produced milk, Mège-Mouriès concluded that butter must be derived from cows’ tissues and hence from tallow. He found that tallow itself was too high-melting and had a waxy mouthfeel, but by separating a liquid fraction from it, a suitable fat, oleo-margarine, was obtained. In July 1870, Napoleon III declared war on Germany, or strictly speaking on Prussia, and a margarine factory was quickly built at Passy, near Paris. However, with the complete defeat of the French army at the Battle of Sedan in September and the entry of the Prussian army into Paris, the emperor was deposed and the factory was closed. Napoleon fled to Britain where he died on 9 January 1873. He is buried in the Imperial Crypt at Saint Michaels’ Abbey, Farnborough. Now without a patron, Mège-Mouriès sold his invention for 60,000 francs to two Dutchmen, Simon van den Bergh and Anton Jurgens. They quickly established margarine factories in The Netherlands and in other European countries. Thus, as a result of Napoleon III’s failed imperial ambitions, The Netherlands, not France, became the centre of Europe’s margarine, edible-oil and fat-processing industries, and our modern industry had begun. Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 1 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century Mège-Mouriès’ patent describes most of the steps that are familiar to us in a modern refinery, e.g. bleaching or decolourising of the tallow (by treatment with dilute hydrochloric acid) and deodorisation or removal of offflavours (by treatment with an acidified infusion of pig’s stomach), to give a fat that “has no longer the odour of animal fat and has all the flavour of the most delicate fat”, although clearly the modern technology for these various steps is quite different from that recommended in the patent. For the present purpose the section on pressing is the most important. “Pression - Cette opération est destinée a séparer la partie dure qui rend le corps gras grenu, le fait figer rapidement, et se colle au palais. On sait que I’industrie ordinaire fait cette opération très difficilement; elle devient industrielle par les moyens suivants: le corps gras liquide et limpide est versé dans les caisses qui ont une ouverture au bas, et contiennent une couche d’eau tiède; on les couvre, et lorsque, par le refroidissement, la cristallisation est faite, on enlève l’eau par l’ouverture, on renverse la caisse, on laisse tomber la messe sur une table, on la coupe en gâteaux de 1 à 2 centimètres d’épaisseur, on enveloppe ces gâteaux dans une toile et on les met sous presse entre les plaques chaudes; on obtient ainsi environ 60p. % d’un mélange de margarine et d’oléine, d’une composition identique au saindoux, mais d’une saveur bien supérieur; quant à la partie solide, elle reste dans ses toiles.” Which I translate as: “Pressing – This operation is meant to separate the hard part that makes the fat grainy, makes it congeal rapidly and stick to the palate. It is known that it is very difficult to do this operation by ordinary industry methods; it must be done by the following means: the clear and liquid fat is poured out into boxes that have an opening at the bottom and contain a layer of lukewarm water; they are covered, and when, by chilling, the crystallisation is done, the water is raised by the opening, the box is turned over, the mass is let fall on a table and cut into cakes of 1 to 2 cm thickness; the cakes are wrapped in a linen cloth and placed under pressure between warm plates; thus one obtains about 60% of a mixture of margarine (note: stearic acid or harder fat/fatty acid) and olein (note: oleic acid or liquid fat/fatty acid) with a composition identical to lard, but with a very superior flavour; as for the solid part, it remains on the cloths” In more detail added in 1874, the best size for the boxes is given as 20 L of rectangular shape and the crystallisation conditions as 25-30°C for about 24 h. Mège-Mouriès described the product as butter in a primitive state. To make “beurre supérieur” or margarine: “The fat is mixed (at animal heat, i.e. about 40°C) with its weight of water in which has been mixed 1 /50 of mammary tissue (note: cow’s udder), 1/100 of bicarbonate of soda, 1/50 of fresh milk curds (French: caséum de lait) and a sufficient quantity of yellow colour. It is allowed to digest for at least 3 h, while agitating and maintaining it at animal heat; when the transformation is done, it is chilled, preventing the brittle and grainy state…” and making it soft and pliable by a scraping process that he describes as used in soap-making. Apart from the cow’s udder, this process is immediately recognisable as the same as we use to make margarine today, although he does say that it you omit the cow’s udder you get an inferior product. Something for the modern margarine industry to think about?! At the beginning of the 20th century, cottonseed oil became the most important edible oil in the USA. According to Bailey, writing in 1950 in his classic book ‘Melting and Solidification of Fats’1: “The American trade requires a salad oil that will remain fluid at the temperature of mechanical household refrigerators (4045°F), and produce a mayonnaise which is likewise stable at low temperatures. For various reasons, cottonseed oil must serve in large measure as a source for salad oils, yet the unprocessed oil solidifies relatively easily. Hence, fractional crystallization is required to obtain a suitable salad oil. Formerly, a sufficient supply of ‘winterised’ oil was produced by allowing the refined oil to stand in outside storage tanks in cold weather, and drawing the liquid portion off from the partially solidified material settling to the bottom of the tanks. Now, however, the oil is generally refrigerated artificially.” Bailey goes on to say: “The fractionation of edible beef fat to produce low melting oleo oil… is an old process… and formerly a highly important one before catalytic hydrogenation provided means of producing comparable products from liquid vegetable oils.” Concluding his short review of fractionation, he says: “there is a considerable quantity of lard fractionally crystallized… Coconut and palm kernel oils are separated into low and high melting fractions with the latter being used as a confectionery fat. In each of these cases the liquid fraction must be separated from a relatively large solid fraction, hence the operations of crystallizing and pressing resemble those employed for the production of oleo oil, rather than the operations of winterizing…” Rossell2 gives some background on the origins of the fractionation of lauric oils to produce confectionery fats. He says: “The advantages of fractionation were first appreciated by European fat companies who imported coconut oil from Sri Lanka in long wooden barrels called ‘Ceylon Pipes’. The pipes were filled with warm fluid oil which cooled slowly during the sea voyage to cooler European climates. This slow cooling, perhaps coupled with gentle agitation of the ships’ movement, allowed the fat to crystallize and separate into fractions.” Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 2 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century In contrast to fractionation, hydrogenation of oils was not invented until 1901 and patented by Wilhelm Normann in 1903 while working in Leprince & Siveke’s factory in Herford, Germany.3 The first production trials took place in 1905 and 1906 at Joseph Crosfield’s factory in Warrington, England. Like van den Bergh’s and Jurgens’ factories, it was later to become part of Unilever. Large-scale production of hydrogenated fats began at Crosfield’s in 1908. In 1908, hydrogenated whale oil and, in 1909, hydrogenated cottonseed oil were produced in Herford. Interesterification was the last of the three fat modification processes to be developed. In the 1920’s it was introduced in the USA and in Europe, like hydrogenation as a means of improving the functional properties of blends for shortenings and margarines and extending the range of raw materials that could be used. Indeed one of the first patents on the topic was taken out by Normann. It was developed further in the USA in the 1940’s and 1950’s by combining it with a fractional crystallisation step to give the so-called directed interesterification process for the improvement of lard as a shortening. All the fractionation processes mentioned show the same principles and features we use today: complete melting of the fat, slow cooling, gentle or no agitation to encourage the development of large crystals, separation into liquid and solid fractions with differing physical and chemical compositions. As we shall see, there have been tremendous developments in the technology, particularly in the last 25 years, but the principles and the objectives have not changed. Only the use of organic solvents, as patented by Unilever in the late 1950’s for the production of fats to replace cocoa butter, used a process not foreshadowed by the early processes.4 the temperature. The situation is illustrated in Fig. 2, which shows a schematic phase diagram of a binary mixture of triglycerides A and B which form a continuous solid solution, i.e. they are completely miscible in the solid state. Holding the mixture at temperature T1 results in the formation of a solid phase (crystals) of composition c in a liquid of composition a. The fraction of solid phase = (ab/ac). Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the fractionation process, indicating factors that are important at each stage (from reference 5) To obtain crystallisation, it is necessary to increase the concentration of the triglycerides to be crystallised above the saturated-solution concentration at a given temperature. In practice, this is not sufficient to cause crystallisation, and solutions can exist indefinitely with concentrations above the saturation level without forming any crystals. Such solutions are called ‘supersaturated’. Figure 2. Simple schematic phase diagram illustrating the principles of fractionation. 2. Principles of fractionation 2.1 Preliminaries The process of fractionation consists of two steps:5 crystallisation to produce solid crystals in a liquid matrix, separation of the crystals from the liquid matrix. Different factors are important at each stage, as shown in Fig. 1. At this point, it is useful to note that the ‘quality’ of the liquid fraction depends only on the crystallisation step, whereas the ‘quality’ of the hard fraction depends on both the crystallisation and the separation step. By quality, the degree of concentration of the desired triglycerides in the separated fraction is meant. Quality is usually assessed by physical criteria, such as cloud point or solid fat content. When a liquid fat is cooled, a solid phase separates, whose composition and amount depend principally on For any system, we can draw a saturationsupersaturation diagram as shown schematically in Figure 3 for the crystallisation of partially hardened soybean oil.6 The continuous line is the normal solubility Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 3 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century or saturation curve. Below this line, crystallisation is impossible because the solution is not saturated and the situation is stable indefinitely. The dashed lines divide a metastable zone from an unstable or crystallisation zone. In the metastable zone crystallisation is possible, but will not occur spontaneously or immediately without assistance, such as stirring or seeding. Crystallisation will occur spontaneously and immediately in the unstable zone. It can be seen that the position of the dashed-line boundary between the metastable and the unstable zones is variable and depends on process variables such as cooling rate and agitation. third power (size3), it is clear that the solubility must depend on the size of the crystal. Using data for a typical triglyceride, we can calculate the effect of crystal size on solubility, as shown in Tab. 1. Supercooling is the decrease in temperature below the solubility temperature required to get small crystals (in a supersaturated solution) to crystallise. The ‘critical size’ is the minimum size of a crystal that is stable at the prevailing temperature. We can see that small crystals have an enormously increased solubility and require a lot of supercooling to make them crystallise. Table 1. Variation of solubility and supercooling with radius of crystals of a triglyceride (from ref.15). Radius of crystal [μm] [Å] 10 100,000 1 10,000 0.1 1,000 0.01 100 0.001 100 Figure 3. Saturation-supersaturation diagram for crystallisation of partially hardened soybean oil. Effect of cooling rate on metastable/unstable boundary (dashed line). Numbers are rates of cooling [°F/min] at an agitation speed of 120 rpm. (Adapted from reference 6). The reason for the existence of the metastable zone can be understood if crystallisation is treated as a twostep process: Nucleation followed by crystal growth. 2.2 Nucleation Supercooling [oC] 0.004 0.036 0.36 3.6 7.2 Increase in solubility 1.001 1.007 1.1 2.1 1380 In practice, such spontaneous or homogeneous nucleation rarely occurs in fats. Instead, heterogeneous nucleation takes place on solid particles, such as already existing seed crystals, dust, walls of the container or foreign molecules. Once crystals have formed due to primary nucleation, secondary nucleation can also occur. Secondary nuclei form whenever small pieces of crystal are removed from the growing crystal surface. If the pieces are smaller than the critical size, they redissolve; if larger, they act as nuclei and grow to become crystals. Secondary nucleation is undesirable in fractionation. Agitation or stirring is the primary cause, and therefore agitation is usually kept to the minimum required to facilitate heat transfer. 2.3 Growth A crystal nucleus is the smallest crystal that can exist in a solution of a certain concentration and temperature. Aggregates of molecules smaller than a nucleus are called embryos and will redissolve if formed. When molecules come together to form a crystal, there are two opposing forces. Firstly, energy is evolved due to the heat of crystallisation, which favours the process. Secondly, the surface of the crystal increases as the molecules aggregate together. Just as when a balloon is blown up, increasing the surface requires energy to overcome the surface tension or pressure. A stable crystal will form only when the energy due to the heat of crystallisation exceeds that required to overcome the surface energy. Since the surface energy is proportional to the surface area, and hence to size (here: linear dimension of the crystal, e.g. the diameter for spherical crystals) to the second power (size2), and the heat of crystallisation to the volume, and hence to size to the Once a crystal nucleus has formed, it will start growing by the incorporation of other molecules. These molecules are taken from the adjacent liquid layer, which is replenished continuously from the surrounding, supersaturated liquid by diffusion. The growth rate is proportional to the amount of supercooling and inversely proportional to the viscosity, which affects the rate of diffusion. When growth is under way, there is a large evolution of heat. Especially in the absence of stirring, local temperature rises can be very significant. As a result, the volume adjacent to a growing crystal surface may cease to be saturated and/or existing nuclei may redissolve, because the critical size has increased with the rise in temperature. The nucleation and growth sequence may become erratic, leading to imperfect and variable-size crystals. In the industrial fractionation of fats, it is an important aim of the process to limit this exotherm by Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 4 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century varying the rate of heat removal and agitation with temperature. 2.4 Separation To complete the fractionation process, the desired solid triglycerides in the crystals need to be separated from the triglycerides that are liquid at the temperature of crystallisation. These liquid triglycerides are distributed in three locations: in solid solution with the solid triglycerides, in the uncrystallised bulk oil, in the uncrystallised oil that is physically trapped or ‘entrained’ in the crystals. The extent and type of solid solutions formed depend primarily on the fundamental phase behaviour of the fat being crystallised, although high degrees of supercooling will tend to increase the extent of formation of solid solutions. However achieved, once the solid solution has formed in the crystals, the separation step can do nothing to change the composition of the solid phase of the crystals. The uncrystallised bulk oil is relatively easily removed from the crystals, but it should be noted that some liquid oil will always remain as a surface layer. The surface oil retention is proportional to the total surface area of the crystals, which depends on their shape and size – the smaller the crystals the greater their surface area. The entrained oil is more difficult to remove. The separation step must address the problem of reducing the level of entrained oil in the final solid fraction. Three methods have been developed to achieve this: centrifugation, vacuum filtration and pressing. 2.4.1 Centrifugation Although there is a useful density difference of about 10% between solid and liquid, oils are relatively viscous materials at the temperatures of fractionation. In a method now rarely used (the Lanza or Lipofrac TM process), the crystal slurry is mixed with a detergent solution so that the crystals are wetted and move into the aqueous phase. Separation is then easily effected between the oil and aqueous phases. In a newer procedure, the crystal slurry itself is centrifuged using a nozzle centrifuge, which allows the separated crystals to be discharged through nozzles on the outer edge of the centrifuge bowl. Effective and useful separations can be achieved, but results are strongly influenced by viscosity and by crystal size, shape and amount. 2.4.2 Vacuum filtration using a rotary drum or a belt filter through, similar to the operation of a laboratory vacuum filter. Such filters operate in two stages. In the first stage, the crystallised bulk oil is removed and the filter or crystal cake builds up. In the second stage, the residual liquid is sucked out and air or nitrogen sucked through the cake. It is in this second stage that the entrained oil is reduced. Although more complex and expensive, the belt filter has the advantage that more time can be given to this second stage, and the differential pressure can vary along the belt. As a result, the belt filter yields a solid cake fraction with a lower level of entrainment than the drum filter. 2.4.3 Pressing Vacuum filters are necessarily limited to a pressure on the crystals of less than 1 bar. If the pressure is increased, it is possible to squeeze out more of the entrained oil. As noted earlier, improved separation improves the yield but not the quality of the liquid fraction, whereas for the solid fraction, the separation step has a decisive effect on quality. The mechanical or hydraulic pressing process was therefore developed particularly for the production of palm kernel stearin where the quality of the stearin determines its utility and value as a replacement for cocoa butter. Conventional vertical hydraulic presses capable of 100 bar pressure have been used for many years. The process is applied in practice by crystallising the fat statically in blocks, e.g. in trays, in a cold room circulating cold air around the blocks to cool the fat and to remove the heat of crystallisation. The crystallised blocks of fat are then wrapped in filter cloths with a mesh size able to retain the crystals while allowing the entrained oil to flow out, and hydraulic or mechanical pressing is applied just as Mège-Mouriès described. The practical limit on pressure is determined by the point at which no further oil can be squeezed out and/or the solid crystals begin to extrude through the cloth. Such a process is labour intensive, and because of the need to surround the crystals completely with the cloth, it is only feasible for solid crystalline masses with a solid fat content of at least approximately 25%. Thus, if a crystallised slurry of the consistency produced in a stirred crystalliser is to be pressed, a totally different design of press is required. Such presses, membrane filter presses with compressible chambers for the slurry, were developed in the early 1980’s for the fractionation of palm oil. As a result of the development of the membrane filter press, significantly lower entrainment levels and, consequently, higher olein yields can be achieved, as shown in Tab. 2, making this now the preferred choice for new fractionation plants.7,8 Earlier, I mentioned the development of solvent fractionation for the production of steep-melting fats to replace cocoa butter. The advantages of using a solvent are: Here, the crystal slurry is applied to a perforated mesh or cloth, and a vacuum applied to suck the liquid oil Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 5 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century nucleation and growth are faster so that faster rates of cooling can be used, thus favouring short crystallisation times and continuous crystallisers; lower viscosity of the liquid leads to easier filtration; dilution of the fat makes heat transfer easier and the amount of oil in the entrained liquid smaller; the ability to wash the cake repeatedly with fresh solvent leads to very low levels (less than 10%) of entrained oil. Table 2. Comparison of vacuum filtration, centrifugation and membrane press filtration in a palm oil fractionation plant (adapted from Tab. 5.19, refs. 7 and 8; * author’s estimate). Vacuum Filtration (drum/belt) Filtration Data IV palm oil IV olein IV stearin Liquid oil entrained in filter cake Yield of olein Centrifugation (nozzle) Press Filtration (standard 6 bar) 57 40 59% 52 57 38 53%* 57 34 45% 71% 74–75% 78% The use of a solvent has been reviewed.9,10 The selectivity of triglyceride separation in the crystallisation step is little affected by the choice of solvent, and indeed, solvent fractionation has no advantage over dry fractionation here. The choice of solvent does affect the selectivity of separation between lipid classes, particularly the separation of triglycerides from diglycerides, free fatty acids and other lipids more polar than triglycerides. Of the two commonly used solvents, acetone and industrial hexane, the more polar acetone is more effective in separating lipid classes. Due to improvements in separation efficiency using membrane presses, especially if higher pressures and smaller chamber widths are used, as shown in Tab. 3, dry fractionation, i.e. fractionation without solvent, is now capable of rivalling solvent fractionation, albeit with more fractionation steps and lower yields. Table 3. Effect of squeezing pressure and chamber width on the separation efficiency during fractionation of crude palm oil (adapted from Tab. 5.21, ref. 7). Chamber width [mm] Squeezing pressure [bar] Liquid oil entrained in filter cake [%] Yield of stearin [%] IV of stearin (olein IV ~ 57) 50 6 15 30 6 15 30 45 39 35 40 34 30 23.6 20.0 18.3 20.6 18.8 16.7 39.7 36.6 34.7 36.8 34.9 32.1 25 3. Comparison of fractionation with hydrogenation and interesterification For most of the last century, hydrogenation was the major process used for the modification of oils. This situation developed partly because of the great flexibility that hydrogenation offers and partly because of the rise of soybean oil to be the most widely produced and used oil. Soybean oil is relatively unstable to oxidation and is too liquid to be used as the hardstock in shortenings and margarines. Hydrogenation can correct both these deficiencies. In the last ten years, trans fatty acids have been implicated as a nutritional cause of coronary heart disease. The majority of trans acids in our diet comes from hydrogenated oils and, thus, the whole hydrogenation process has come under a cloud. In 2004, Denmark legislated for a maximum 2% trans fatty acids in edible vegetable oils, and from 1 January 2006, labelling of trans acids will be mandatory in the USA. Even without legislation, consumer pressure has led to the removal of trans acid from most retail margarines in Europe. We now regularly see statements in the media such as: “Nothing in our food supply is more dangerous than trans fatty acids that are produced by the partial hydrogenation of oils”.11 Whatever the truth of the matter, I believe, like many others, that hydrogenation is a dying process. One way to eliminate trans acids is to breed oilseed varieties with reduced levels of linolenic acid so that hydrogenation to improve oxidative stability is not required. This has been successful and low-linolenic rapeseed and soybeans oils are commercially available and are used in the frying industry. However, for the products we all enjoy – fancy pastries, cakes, confectionery, biscuits, etc. – we do need some solid fat. If we cannot get it from hydrogenated oils, where else can we get it from? In Mège-Mouriès’ time, butter, lard and tallow were used, but due to fears of cholesterol and saturated fatty acids, these have long been considered undesirable. Thus, the only other sources of harder fat are palm and palm kernel oils and coconut oil. They may be simply blended with liquid oils, but as we noted earlier, interesterification is a useful process to improve the functionality and utility of such blends. The basic principles of the use of interesterification to develop trans-free margarine hardstocks were outlined by Unilever in British patent 1,245,539, filed on 28 February 1969. Note the date when there was already a clear interest in eliminating trans fatty acids and hydrogenated oils, long before the current nutritional, media and consumer interest. The patent claims a polyunsaturated margarine “free from hydrogenated hard fat”. The last and most general claim is: “Process for the preparation of a margarine fat…which comprises interesterifying a mixture of unhardened fats comprising a coconut fat, a palm fat Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 6 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century and a constituent with at least 60% fatty acids of a chain length of at least 16 carbon atoms, and blending the interesterified mixture with 25-90% of a liquid fat…”. Essentially, the hardstock is to be a mixture of unhydrogenated palm and lauric oils (about 2:1) interesterified to produce trisaturated triglycerides. However, interesterification is, like hydrogenation, also a chemical process with environmental impacts. There may also be health issues lurking, such as the production of long-chain ketones12 or the placing of saturated fatty acids in the nutritionally less desirable 2position in the triglycerides. It would clearly be good to get rid of chemical processes altogether. For interesterification, the option of using enzymic catalysis to selectively keep the saturated acids at the 1- and 3positions of the glycerol molecule does now seem to be economic and competitive with chemical catalysis, and we may expect that most new interesterification plants will use enzymic catalysis, as exemplified by the new ADM plant built in the USA in 2002. There is another trans-free source of hard fat – fully hydrogenated liquid oils – and it is interesting to note that ADM’s NovaLipidTM range of zero and low-trans fats makes use of fully hardened soybean oil. Hydrogenated oils are equated with trans acids in the consumer’s mind and are therefore bad news; so naturally, ADM did not want to label the oil as ‘interesterified and hydrogenated’. As a result, they asked the Food and Drug Administration in the USA for ‘clarification’.13 The FDA has allowed the description to be simply ‘interesterified soybean oil’ with the possible addition of ‘high stearate’ or ‘stearic oil’. ADM are quoted as saying: “This designation for NovaLipid TM interesterified ingredients will allow customers to replace the term ‘hydrogenated’ with the term ‘interesterified’ when describing these ingredients within a finished product’s ingredient specification.” There is surely some deception here, so we may expect some manufacturers to specifically label their products as ‘free from hydrogenated oils’. We may also expect some backlash from consumer organisations and the public. What a pity that neither ADM nor the FDA felt sufficiently confident about the science behind the process to educate the public about what they have really done. In my opinion, clarity and openness in labelling are vital if food manufacturers are to keep the trust of their customers. Fractionation has the advantage over both hydrogenation and interesterification that it is a purely physical process with a low environmental impact. It has grown in line with the growth of palm oil, which is set to be the dominant oil of the 21st century, as we shall see in the last section. Finally, we must not forget the economics. Fractionation is a cheap process, as shown in Tab. 4. Table 4. Comparison of the costs of fractionation, hydrogenation and interesterification based on 100 t per day plant capacity (adapted from Tabs. 5.10, 5.17, 5.22, ref. 7). Process Fractionation (to produce palm olein IV 57) Hydrogenation (to hydrogenate soyabean oil to IV 75 Interesterification Capital cost [million US$] Operating cost [US$/t] 2.25 6.7 Operating cost including investment pay-off [US$/t] 20 2.00 37.8 50 1.50 22.8 32 4. Implications for the 21st century Fig. 4 shows that during the last 25 years of the 20 th century, soybean oil maintained its position as the world’s most important oil, but that palm oil grew rapidly to challenge this position. Trade in palm oil already exceeds trade in soybean oil, and during the next 10 years, production of palm oil is predicted to exceed production of soybean oil. In line with the growth of palm oil production has been the growth in fractionation capacity and the production of palm olein and palm stearin. As shown in Fig. 5, palm olein may now be considered the world’s fourth favourite oil after soybean, palm and rapeseed oil. Even palm stearin production exceeds the production of olive oil. Figure 4. Growth in world demand for leading vegetable oils, 1976-2003 (source: J. Fry, A Hallam, LMC International). Although I have concentrated on the production of the commodity grades of palm olein and stearin, there are today a wide range of oleins and stearins, as well as mid-fractions obtained by two, three or even four fractionation steps. Fractionation plus palm oil is as flexible as hydrogenation plus soybean oil. Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 7 Fractional crystallisation: Fat Modification for the 21st Century Palm oil is currently the only major oil in the world that claims to be ‘sustainably’ produced.14 Fractionation is environmentally benign and meets the ‘green’ aspirations of today’s consumers. It has no known or conceivable health issues associated with it. 5. 6. 7. 8. Figure 5. Palm fractions are major oils (palm olein and stearin production are estimated by using the production figures from Malaysia proportionately for the total world figures) (source: MPOB & USDA). We can thus confidently predict that the dominant modification process of the 21st century will be fractional crystallisation, just as it was at the beginning of the modern oils- and fats-processing industry after MègeMouriès invented margarine. We have seen that the oils and fats industry developed in many European countries and that it had its origins in the fractionation of tallow at a key point in European history. Forty years ago, when I started my career as a research scientist, the message of the time was: “Make love, not war.” Today, taking our lesson from the history of margarine, I give you my message for the 21st century and for future European and world harmony: “Make margarine, not war.” With that thought, I offer this lecture in recognition of the second Euro Fed Lipid Technology Award and of the European Federation for the Science and Technology of Lipids and its aim of “improving lipid science and technology in Europe” with which I am pleased to have been associated from its beginning. References 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. to cocoa-butter-substitutes. British Patent No. 827, 172, 1960, filed 20.02.1956. Timms RE (1997) Fractionation. In: Gunstone FD, Padley FB (eds) Lipid Technologies and Applications ISBN 0-8247-9838-4. Marcel Dekker, New York (USA) 1997, pp 199-222. Singh G (1974) Analysis of crystallization systems with applications to continuous fractional crystallization of fatty acid triglycerides. A I Chem Eng Symposium Series 72: 100-109. Kellens M (2000) Oil modification processes. In: Hamm W, Hamilton RJ (eds), Edible Oil Processing ISBN 1-84127-038-5. Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield (UK), pp 129-173. Kellens M, Hendrix M (2003) Membrane press filtration in oil refining & fat modification. Paper presented at Lenser Colloquium, 20 May, ACHEMA, Frankfurt (Germany) 2003. Hamm W (1986) Fractionation – with or without solvent? Fette Seifen Anstrichm 88: 533-537. Timms RE (1983) Choice of solvent for fractional crystallisation of palm oil. In: Palm Oil Product Technology in the Eighties, Pushparajah E, M. Rajadurai M (eds). Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), pp 277-290. www.bantransfats.com. Ban Trans Fats: The campaign to ban partially hydrogenated oils. Liu L (2004) How is chemical interesterification initiated: nucleophilic substitution or alpha-proton abstraction? J Am Oil Chem Soc 81: 331-37. www77.ssldomain.com/twoi/newsmaker_article. .asp?idNewsMaker=6042&fSite=A0545&category =25&page=1. ADM to expand NovaLipidTM-line of zero/low trans-fat oils and margarines. Receives FDA clarification regarding interesterified trans-fat replacements. www.sustainable-palmoil.org. Roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Timms RE (1991): Crystallisation of fats. Chemistry & Industry. 20 May (1991) 342-45. [Received: September 20, 2004; accepted: November 8, 2004 (Eur J Lipid Sci Technol) ] 1. Bailey AE (1950) In: Melting and Solidification of Fats. Interscience Publishers, Inc, New York (USA), p 343. 2. Rossell JB (1985) Fractionation of lauric oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62: 385-90. 3. Bockisch M (1998) In: Fats and Oils Handbook, ISBN 0-935315-82-9. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL (USA). 4. Unilever Ltd. (Best RL, Crossley A, Paul S, Pardun H, Soeters CJ) (1956): Improvements in or relating Malaysian Oil Science and Technology 2005 Vol. 14 No. 1 8