Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Upgrading and Shared Prosperity: Some Insights from Micro Research Eric Verhoogen Columbia University Brasilia, July 1, 2015 Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Introduction I There is broad agreement that innovation and productivity improvements in manufacturing are a key ingredient in economic growth. I Important point from Mark’s talk: not all innovation is new-to-the-world. I All forms of upgrading and the firm level can contribute to growth. I Key question 1: How can we promote upgrading? I Key question 2: What are the links between upgrading and shared prosperity ? I Within sectors, firms that do more upgrading also tend to pay higher wages. I Direction of causality unclear. I Here I will talk about 5 insights into these questions from my micro research on manufacturing firms in developing countries. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 1: Input quality matters for output quality 1 .5 0 −.5 −1 −1.5 log real output price, dev. from year means 1.5 A. Output prices, hollow brick (ladrillo hueco) slope=−0.028, s.e.=0.032 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log employment, deviated from year means 0 −5 log real input price, dev. from year means 5 B. Input prices, common clay, paid by producers of hollow brick slope=0.026, s.e.=0.073 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log employment, deviated from year means I Fig. 1 from Kugler & Verhoogen, REStud 2012. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 1: Input quality matters for output quality −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log employment, deviated from year means 1.5 1 .5 0 −.5 log real input price, dev. from year means 1 .5 0 −.5 −3 −1.5 −1 1.5 B. Input prices, refined rendered suet, paid by producers of bar soap slope=0.110, s.e.=0.038 −1.5 −1 log real output price, dev. from year means A. Output prices, bar soap slope=0.055, s.e.=0.025 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log employment, deviated from year means 1.5 1 .5 0 −.5 −1.5 −1 log real input price, dev. from year means C. Input prices, unrefined rendered suet, paid by producers of bar soap slope=0.103, s.e.=0.039 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log employment, deviated from year means I Fig. 2 from Kugler & Verhoogen, REStud 2012. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 1: Input quality matters for output quality I On average, larger, more-productive firms use higher-quality inputs, produce higher-quality outputs than smaller firms. I Colombian manufacturing overall more like bar soap than like hollow bricks. I Industrial upgrading requires upgrading of entire complex of final-good producers and input suppliers. I Imported inputs tend to be higher-quality, may be important for facilitating quality upgrading of final goods (Kugler & Verhoogen, AER P&P, 2009). I Related idea: producing new varieties of outputs may require new varieties of inputs (Goldberg et al., 2010) Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 2: Exports ↑ → Quality ↑, Wages ↑ I New Beetle, almost all exported. e in sco, 750 etles City, 500 I Old Beetle, almost all sold domestically (produced until 2003). I Source: Verhoogen, QJE 2008. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 2: Exports ↑ → Quality ↑, Wages ↑ Figure IV Exports, High-quality Models as Percentage of VW Output 100 90 Percentage of total output 80 70 60 50 40 % output exported 30 % output New Beetle/Jetta/Golf 20 10 0 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Notes: Output measured in physical units. Omitted model from upper curve is the Original Beetle. Data from Bulletins of the Asociacion Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz (Mexican Automobile Industry Association). Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 2: Exports ↑ → Quality ↑, Wages ↑ I Técnico: 9 yrs. education, 2003 starting wage ∼US$11/day. rs [not ars + 3 I Especialista: 12 yrs. education, 2003 starting wage ∼US$18/day. ay Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 2: Exports ↑ → Quality ↑, Wages ↑ ions, Levels of Key Variables vs. log Domestic Sales, 1993 and 1997 App. Fig. IVb: Log white-collar wage log real white-collar wage 0.75 94 97 0.5 0.25 0 1993 -0.25 1997 -0.5 -0.75 2 -3 -2 -1 0 log domestic sales 1993 1 2 I Non-parametric regressions, variables deviated from industry-year means. App. Fig. IVd: Log wage ratio I Similar patterns hold for ISO 9000 certification. 0.3 Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 2: Exports ↑ → Quality ↑, Wages ↑ metric Regressions, Changes 1993-1997 and 1997-2001 App. Fig. Vb: Changes in log white-collar wage Δ log real white-collar wage 0.2 7 1 0.1 0 -0.1 change 1993-1997 change 1997-2001 -0.2 -0.3 2 -3 -2 -1 0 log domestic sales, initial year 1 2 Fig. Vd: Changes in log wage variables ratio IApp. Non-parametric regressions, deviated from industry-year means. I Similar patterns hold for ISO 9000 certification. 0.05 Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 3: Exports ↑ → Wage premia ↑ −1 0 1 2 3 .3 .2 .1 0 −.1 avg. person component, deviated −.3 −.2 .2 .1 0 −.3 −.2 −.1 plant component, deviated .2 .1 0 −.1 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 1993−1997 1997−2001 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 log domestic sales, initial year, deviated 3 .05 0 −.05 −.1 .05 0 −.05 .05 0 −.05 1993−1997 1993−1997 1997−2001 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log domestic sales, initial year, deviated 3 .1 Figure 9f. Changes in person component change in avg. person component, deviated Figure 9e. Changes in plant component .1 Figure 9d. Changes in avg. log daily wage change in plant component, deviated log domestic sales, 1993, deviated .1 log domestic sales, 1993, deviated −.1 avg. log real daily wage, deviated −.2 −.3 −2 log domestic sales, 1993, deviated −.1 change in avg. log real daily wage, deviated −3 I Figure 9c. Person component .3 Figure 9b. Plant component .3 Figure 9a. Avg. log daily wage 1997−2001 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 log domestic sales, initial year, deviated Source: Frı́as, Kaplan & Verhoogen, Unpub. 2011. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 4: Adoption not Automatic I Ongoing project with Atkin, Chaudhry, Chaudry and Khandelwal, 2015. I Setting: Soccer-ball cluster in Sialkot, Pakistan I ∼30 million balls/year, almost all exported. I 40% of world production, 70% within hand-stitched segment (WSJ, 2010). Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters 1st Stage: Glue Cotton/Polyester to Artificial Leather More on industry Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters 2nd Stage: Cut Hexagons and Pentagons Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters 3rd Stage: Print Logos/Designs on Panels Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters 4th Stage: Stitch Panels around Bladder Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Existing Cutting Technology Standard “buckyball” design: 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons. For standard ball, almost all firms use 2-hexagon and 2pentagon “flush” dies. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Existing Cutting Technology (cont.) Hexagons tessellate. ∼ 8% of rexine wasted. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Existing Cutting Technology (cont.) Pentagons don’t. ∼ 20-24% of rexine wasted. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Origin of Idea In a YouTube video of a Chinese factory producing the Adidas Jabulani ball, I noticed a different layout of pentagons. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro to Matters one-half ofExports the length of d. These twoPremia chords define a parallelogram Input Quality and Quality Wage Adoption not Automaticq(d)Worker Buy-In Matters inscribed in K, which turns out to be extensive (see Lemma 1 of the following section). Now vary d and find a critical position of d = do such that q(do) is of minimum area. This minimum-area extensive parallelogram generates a maximum density double-lattice packing with copies of K. In general, locating the critical diameter do may be a problem, but in many special cases, as in the following examples, the diameter do is easy to find. Origin of Idea (cont.) We could also have gone to: G. Kuperberg and W. Kuperberg, “Double-Lattice Packings oftheConvex Bodiesin in the 2Plane,” Examples. An application of algorithm described Remark to the case Discrete when K is a regular pentagon results in a double-lattice packing of density & Computational Geometry, 5: 389-397, 1990. ( 5 - x / 5 ) / 3 = 0 . 9 2 1 3 1 . . . , shown in Fig. 7. This packing may have the maximum Fig. 7. Maximumdensity double-latticepacking with regular pentagons. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Origin of Idea (cont.) Or the Wikipedia Pentagons page: Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Blueprint Annalisa Guzzini (an architect, also my wife) and I developed a blueprint for a 4-pentagon die to implement the optimal packing. 39.5 54 5 I 44mm-edge pentagons: ∼250 with old die vs. 272 with ours. 1-2 2 I 43.5mm-edge pentagons: ∼258 vs. 280. X 272 5 39.5 54 Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters The “Shamyla” Die Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters 20 0 10 cumulative number of dies 30 40 Die Purchases by Firm Z Apr 12 Oct 12 Apr 13 Oct 13 Apr 14 date I Second-largest by employment in Sialkot (∼2,200 employees). I No-drop group, late responder. I As of March 2014, using offset die for ∼100% of production. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Adoption as of Aug. 2013 Full sample # ever active firms # ever responded # currently active and ever responded # traded in # ordered new die (beyond trade-in) # received new die (beyond trade-in) # ever used new die (>1000 balls, conservative) # ever used new die (>1000 balls, liberal) Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Tech Drop Cash Drop No Drop Total 35 35 32 19 1 1 4 5 18 17 15 0 0 0 0 0 79 64 59 0 6 3 1 1 132 116 106 19 7 4 5 6 Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 5: Worker Buy-In Matters firm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 no orders to try on too busy 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 5 2 doubt profitable waiting for others to prove value waiting for others to iron out kinks cutters unwilling 3 3 other production issues other 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 printing problems 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 4 3 I Numbers indicate order of importance indicated by respondent. I Sample is round-4 respondents who have had die in their factory but are not currently using it. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 5: Worker Buy-In Matters I Why were cutters resisting? I Most employees paid piece-rate and new technology slows them down, at least initially. I Cost savings accrue to owner. I In absence of changes to labor contract, effective wage falls. I A few owners changed labor contracts, but most did not. I Either they simply did not realize that a change would be desirable, or I they found it too costly relative to expected benefits of technology. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Insight 5: Worker Buy-In Matters I We ran a second experiment in firms we had given technology to: I In some firms, we offered lump-sum bonus equal to 1 month salary to cutter (and printer), if they could demonstrate competence using the technology in presence of owner. I Returned in one month to do test. All passed. I Had significant effect on adoption: I I Half of firms that could have responded ended up adopting. None in control group in short term, one in medium term. I One generalization we think we can draw: workers need to expect to share in gains to adoption in order for adoption to be successful. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Conclusion I Some (tentative) lessons for Brazil: I Quality upgrading is an important part of of innovation, broadly defined, within firms. I Upgrading of final goods requires access to high-quality inputs, both foreign and domestic. I Upgrading products and productivity also requires “upgrading” the workforce: I I In part this requires finding new higher-skilled workers. But in larger part it requires motivating and training the existing workforce. I Labor relationships (and labor-market institutions) matter for technology adoption/productivity improvement. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Conclusion I Direction of causality between upgrading and shared prosperity (i.e. wages, employment) still an open question. I Standard view: innovations arrive exogenously, change skill demand in firm. I Alternative view: innovations arise endogenously, in part through worker input. Workers have to have incentives to share knowledge, ideas, good will. I Results from Mexico, Pakistan provide some evidence for alternative view. But there is still a lot of work to do. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters Conclusion I This seems a promising direction for future work: I Minimum wage study I Evaluation of innovation-policy interventions. I What are effects of innovation on wages, employment at firm level? I Is there an interaction of policies and labor-market conditions in generating innovation? Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia Intro Input Quality Matters Exports and Quality Wage Premia Adoption not Automatic Worker Buy-In Matters References I Atkin, David, Azam Chaudhry, Shamyla Chaudry, Amit K. Khandelwal, and Eric Verhoogen, “Organizational Barriers to Technology Adoption: Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan,” 2015. Mimeo, Columbia University. Goldberg, Pinelopi K., Amit Khandelwal, Nina Pavcnik, and Petia Topalova, “Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010, 125 (4), 1727–1767. Kugler, Maurice and Eric Verhoogen, “Plants and Imported Inputs: New Facts and an Interpretation,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, May 2009, 99 (2), 501–507. and , “Prices, Plant Size and Product Quality,” Review of Economic Studies, January 2012, 79 (1), 307–339. Kuperberg, G. and W. Kuperberg, “Double-Lattice Packings of Convex Bodies in the Plane,” Discrete & Computational Geometry, 1990, 5, pp. 389–397. Verhoogen, Eric, “Trade, Quality Upgrading and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008, 123 (2), 489–530. Wright, Tom, “Pakistan Defends Its Soccer Industry,” Wall Street Journal, 2010. April 26, 2010. Upgrading and Shared Prosperity Eric Verhoogen, Columbia