NBAA Best Practices in Corporate Shuttle Operations Lisa Swartzwelder Cindy Polfliet Will Das Ron Craig Shuttle Reservation Systems Lisa G. Swartzwelder Washington, DC | Month DD, 2011 Shuttle Reservation Systems Process driven by: • Corporate culture (self serve/high touch) • Scale of operation (Total number of passengers served, seat capacity, route complexity, flight department resources) • Access to technology • Global components 4 Types of Shuttle Reservation Systems • Schedule on intranet: Email / Fax / Phone • In-house technology (inventory management system with online booking tool) • Business Aviation Software (Bart, FOS, Fpak, PFM) etc. • Integration with company travel department and commercial reservation components 5 Shuttle Reservation Systems Our Process • “One-stop shop” for our traveling associates – Common portal (on-line or phone reservation assistance). – 24/7 system supports shuttle requests as well as commercial air, hotel, ground coach system or rental car. – Passenger itinerary includes all components. – Travel support for re-accomodations if Shuttle “breaks”. – Travel department manages the reservation tools. – Flight department manages the manifest and process the day of departure. • Collaborative management between Flight, Travel and third party agency. 6 Reservation Process Components 70% Booked Online: HR feed from Peoplesoft (Nightly) Associates access travel site 2 ways: On-Line Company Intranet Site (airplane icon) External web address - Single sign-on with network log-in Cliqbook Profile Book Travel Note: All data that comes through HR feed must be updated in Access by associate 30% Booked via Phone: Sabre GDS Associates call Travel Services (Travel Agency) Option #4 to book or change Option #1 for flight status including shuttle Option#2 for travel within the US Business Aviator: LBI Shuttle Airlines: AA DL UA Hotels: Hilton Hyatt Starwood Car Rental: Hertz Avis Enterprise Travel Agency Book Reservation: Shuttle Hotel Meal Request Waitlist Request (if sold out) Commercial air (if shuttle sold out) Travel Counselor assists with booking Back-office (Trams) Download invoiced transactions Cleanse data Reporting (I-Bank) Flight Dispatch Team drives invoice after flight departs Pre-trip reports flight by Source data for manifest Crisis/emergency contact information Upload back-office data into I-Bank every Wed. Source data for weekly reports to Finance Historical data housed for analysis and ad-hoc reporting * Itinerary (Trondent) and TEB airport codes into FBO address locations Email with PDF attachment Online access available via Airweb link from travel page Translates CMH Automated QC (IQCX) Reservation Accuracy Adds ground coach remarks Email reminder to travelers 2 days before flight Flight Department Shuttle Reservation Process Receive Ibank report links 24 hours before Next day flight (2 flights and car/hotel link) Run spectra for flight # to compare to report information. Reconcile 2X before flight by comparing LD list in BA to what was built prior day. Update with spectra hot key Receive calls from Travel Agents for passenger additions / cancellations. Adjust manifest Finalize accurate manifest by cross referencing BA. Invoice the flight for finance allocation. Must invoice 24 hours of the flight or data is lost Passenger Check-in Build tomorrows’ manifest Weekly Finance ReportReceive Ibank link on Wed AM. Waitlist monitoring Distribute to finance distribution list Clearing passengers within 24 hours Weekly Flight Report for Flight Administration System Instabilities Waitlist Jumping Correction process Overbooking Correction Process Shuttle Reservation Systems Challenges • Bringing two worlds together that don’t normally come together! • Technology is not aligned with the agile mission of business aviation – Itinerary changes take 5-7 days – Corporate Shuttles are outside the scope of intended use of GDS’s such as Sabre and Worldspan: • Non commercially served airports • Security (agency viewer access) • Corporate shuttles require additional reporting components that conflict with travel agency efficiency metrics • Corporate culture not tolerant to overbooking and waitlist jumping 9 Shuttle Reservation System Questions? Cindy Polfliet… take it away! 10 Shuttle Reservation Systems Cindy Polfliet Washington, DC | October 11, 2011 Shuttle Reservation Systems Challenges/Opportunities • Manual Process • Technology • Economic Conditions • Customer Service 12 Shuttle Reservation Systems Manual Process • Human Errors – Cancelled seats – Wrong Leg 13 Shuttle Reservation Systems Technology • GDS versus Corporate Aviation Reservation System – Crewing – Reporting 14 Shuttle Reservation Systems Economic Conditions • Discovering ways to do more with less people • Improve processes 15 Shuttle Reservation Systems Customer Service • Outsourcing • One-Stop-Shop 16 Shuttle Reservation Systems Solutions • Automation/Integration • Real Time Information • API Line directly from GDS to Aviation Software • API Line through a third party connecting the two systems 17 Shuttle Reservation Systems Questions? 18 Alternate Lift Will Das Alternate Lift Why Alternate Lift? • Limited Asset • Limits ability to serve the customer • Planes Trains and Automobiles and……Ferry Boat? • Continuity of service 20 Alternate Lift An argument for providing…. • Ability to serve the customer • Ability to provide efficient cost effective travel • Still provides the time to be productive • Keeps travel within the organizations control 21 Alternate Lift Considerations • Financial implications* • Security* • Crew training, qualifications, maintenance* * NBAA Management Guide. 22 Alternate Lift Presentation to Senior Leadership • Cost Analysis • Current Shuttle Budget • Airline Segment Fees • Baggage Fees • Hotel Fees • Rental Car Fees • Cost of Alternate Lift 23 Alternate Lift Merging two cultures • Safety Audit • Crew Records • Training • SMS • Maintenance • Work Flow Processes • Communication Process • Continuous Improvement 24 Alternate Lift Questions? 25 FAA Part 125 Ron Craig Washington, DC | Month DD, 2011 FAA Part 125 Shuttles History: • FAR Part 125 Published October 9, 1980, effective February 1, 1981. • FAR Part 125 governs private carriage in aircraft with 20 or more seats and 6,000 pounds or more payload capacity (Boeing class aircraft). FAR Part 91 prescribes general operating rules for all aircraft. • The FAA always intended to allow Full Letters of Deviation from FAR Part 125 to corporate flight departments. When the FAA first published Part 125 in the October 9, 1980 Federal Register, the FAA stated: "Although it is difficult to foresee more than a few situations in which a deviation from the entire Part could be justified, it is possible. Some examples are ... a corporate flight department operating an airline-type airplane solely for carriage of company executives." 27 FAA Part 125 • In 2003, the FAA organized an "Aviation Rulemaking Committee" (ARC) to consider rescinding Part 125. Instead, the ARC created a several stage proposal that would have placed purely corporate operators under FAR Part 91 rather than FAR Part 125. • On July 5, 2006, the FAA issued Notice N8700.46, which announces the FAA's intention to change its guidance regarding FAR Part 125. The Notice states that the FAA will no longer allow full Letters of Deviation Authority ("LODA") and will exclude this class of aircraft from operations authorized by FAR 91.501(b)(5). 28 FAA Part 125 • One aircraft operator filed a suit on September 29, 2006 with the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to stop the FAA implementation of Notice N8700.46 because it represented rulemaking in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. • On December 21, 2006 the FAA issued Notice N8000.345. Subject: Updated Guidance on Letters of Deviation Authority to Deviate from the Certificate and Operations Specifications Requirements of Part 125. Appendix 2 was the Sample Letter of Compliance (LOC). • NBAA Representatives and potential/future 125 Operators met with John Duncan and Jack Pinto from AFS 800 in Washington D.C., February 2008 to discuss concerns about losing the “Full or Blanket Deviation” to Part 91, and the challenges and financial consequences faced in converting to Part 125 with a “Partial Deviation”. 29 FAA Part 125 • Part 125 compliance deadline was moved from March 31, 2008 to September 30, 2008. • The NBAA has requested that the FAA enter the past OPSS Dated February 9, 2010, into WebOpss. The following four (4) deviations were added to the OPSS as of February 9, 2011 • Deviation From: 125.1(a) - A510 • Deviation Authority: 125.3(a) • Description: Authorizes a temporary ferry flight SFA only with the issuance of A510. • Deviation From: 125.1 (a) – A511 • Deviation Authority: 125.3(a) • Description: Authorizes a temporary sales demonstration SFA only with the issuance of A511. 30 FAA Part 125 Deviations Continued: • Deviation From: 125.1 (a) – A512 • Deviation Authority: 125.3(a) • Description: Authorizes a temporary training flight SFA only with the issuance of A512. • Deviation From: 125.189(c) • Deviation Authority: 125.3(a) • Description: Authorizes a partial ditching demonstration in accordance with 14 CFR 121.291(e). 31 FAA Part 125 We are requesting the following deviation also be made available in WEBOPSS: • Deviation Authority: 125.3(a) • Description: Authorizes a deviation from 125.211(b) and 125.269(c) which requires flight attendants to be seated during movement on the surface. Permits flight attendant movement about the cabin during aircraft movement on the surface in order to perform duties related to the safety of the airplane and its occupants by complying with 121.391(d). 32 FAA Part 125 • Part 125 LODA Holder verses Part 125 Certificate Holder. • Part 125 Training/Checking Issues. 33 FAA Part 125 Questions? 34