ABANDONMENT
Abandon or not to abandon: what constitutes voluntary abandonment
in the wake of Scott v. McTiernan. Nicole C. Nachtigal. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 247-257 (2001).
Evolution of international law on the decommisssioning of oil and
gas installations. Mark Osa Igiehon, Patricia Park. 2001 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 199-212 (No. 9, 2001).
Restoring inactive and abandoned mine sites: a guide to managing
environmental liabilities. Jeffrey A. Kodish. 16 J Envtl L &
Litig 381-420 (2001).
USGS abandoned mine lands initiative: Colorado and Montana pilot
projects. Rebekah King. 31 Colo Law 87-90 (Nov 2002).
ACCESS
Access on federal public lands. Daniel A. Jensen. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 4-1(56) (2005).
Access to Department of the Interior lands managed for limited
purposes. Robert D. Comer, Lyle K. Rising. Severed Minerals,
Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in Mineral
Extraction Operations 6B-1(6) (2005).
Access to public lands - its effect on natural gas supply in the
United States. . 49 Landman 45-62 (Jan/Feb 2004).
Access to subjacent minerals. Karen J. Greenwell, Joseph J.
Zaluski. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 11-1(21) (2005).
Common law of access and surface use in oil, gas, and mining.
Donald N. Zillman. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of
Access, & Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 1A-1(48)
(2005), reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J 117-183 (No. 1,
2005).
Indian lands - surface access and use. Colby L. Branch. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 7-1(38) (2005).
Private lands - surface access and use. Rick D. Davis, Jr..
Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use
in Mineral Extraction Operations 9A-1(44) (2005).
RS 2477: the battle over rights-of-way on federal land. Michael
S. Freeman, Lusanna J. Ro. 32 Colo Law 105-111 (Oct 2003).
State lands - surface access and use for mineral extraction.
John W. Andrews. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of
Access, & Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 8-1(10)
(2005).
Surface access by the remedy of last resort: condemnation.
Robert A. Bassett. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of
Access, & Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 16-1(25)
(2005).
That was then, but that's what counts: freezing the law of R.S.
2477. Robert H. Hughes. 2002 Utah L Rev 679-703 (2002).
ACCOUNTING - MINERALS
Accounting for extractive industries: an Australian perspective.
Nasser Spear, Trevor Wise. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 30-53
(2000).
ACCOUNTING - MINING
Factors and forces of the extractive industry environment and
their implications for accounting measurement and financial
reporting. Nasser Spear, Trevor Wise. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 1-27 (2002).
Report on the international accounting standards board's
extractive industries accounting project. Horace Brock. 20
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-12 (2001).
ACCOUNTING - OIL AND GAS
Accounting for business combinations: implications of recent
changes for oil and gas firms. B. Charlene Henderson, Patricia
A. Ryan, John G. Wermert. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 315-332 (2001).
Accounting for site closure and environmental costs: a new maze
of standards and requirements. Charlotte J. Wright. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 481-494 (2000).
Analysis of oil and gas stock returns with benchmark ratios.
Hugh Grove, Tommi Johnsen, Ron Rizzuto. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 73-85 (1999).
Business combinations: recent changes in accounting standards
illustrated through two mergers. C.P. Carter, George E. Nogler.
51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 81-91 (2002).
Changes in accounting practices in the oil and gas industry
during the 1990s. Teddy L. Coe, Alan K. Styles. 20 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-27 (2001).
Changes in accounting practices in the oil and gas industry
during the 1990s. Teddy L. Coe, Alan K. Styles. 21 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 8-37 (2002).
COPAS an update. John H. Gear. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
106-115 (2000).
COPAS: an update. Jon H. Gear. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
145-150 (2002).
Current developments in financial accounting and reporting.
Dennis R. Jennings. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 129-137
(1999).
Current developments in financial accounting and reporting.
Dennis R. Jennings. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 106-118
(2000).
Effects of accounting choice on analysts' forecast errors in
extractive industries. Debra C. Jeter. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q
567-599 (2001).
Financial performance reporting changes suggested. Linda M.
Nichols. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 611-617 (2000).
Financial statement fraud: after Enron and Dynergy. Nicholas G.
Apostolou, D. Larry Crumbley. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 371-386
(2002).
Forecasting cash flow from operations: evidence from the oil and
gas industry. Kevin T. Berry, David O'Bryan, Jeffrey J. Quirin.
48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 517-528 (2000).
International standards for the oil industry. Kurt H. Buerger,
Linda M. Nichols. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 805-809 (2002).
Oil and gas industry: leading in accounting for the new economy.
Linda M. Nichols. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 419-423 (2001).
Precedent emerges in pipeline asset class determination: two
strikes against the IRS. Stephanie F. Watson. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 297-307 (1999).
Proposed changes in consolidations policy - how will oil, gas and
energy companies be affected. Joyce A. Strawser. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 699-711 (2000).
Provision for non-audit services and the low-balling of audit
fees for firms in the oil and gas industry. D. Larry Crumbley,
Donald Deis, Santanu Mitra, Kenny Reynolds. 21 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 87-109 (2002).
Relevance versus reliability of oil and gas reserve quantity and
value disclosures: the results of two decades of research.
Horace R. Brock, Charlotte J. Wright. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 86-110 (1999).
SFAS 141 and 142: relevance to prior and future mergers and
acquisitions in the oil, gas, and energy industry. Cal
Christian, Mark McCarthy, Douglas K. Schneider. 21 Petroleum Acct
& Fin Mgmt J 53-62 (2002).
Topical index, volumes 1-20. . 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
103-157 (2002).
Why oil prices need to rise: the illusions of oilfield costs and
technology. Matthew R. Simmons. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 231-250
(1999).
ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES
2005 COPAS accounting procedure - a comparison of key features of
the 1984, 1986 and 2005 procedures. Karla J. Bower. 50 Landman
15-21 (May/June 2005), reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J No. 2
(2005).
COPAS: an update. Jon H. Gear. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
115-122 (2002).
Geographic segment disclosures for the petroleum industry under
SFAS 131. Dave L. Nichols, W. Mark Wilder. 21 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 50-67 (2002).
Maintaining records for timber activities. Darwin L. King. 49
Oil Gas & Energy Q 665-682 (2001).
ACID RAIN
Mine is a terrible thing to waste: past, present and future
reclamation efforts to correct the environmentally damaging
effects of coal mines. A. Brooke Rubenstein, David Winkowski. 13
Vill Envtl L J 189-215 (2002).
Sustainable development and air quality: the need to replace
basic technologies with cleaner alternatives. David M. Driesen.
32 Envtl L Rep 10277-10290 (2002).
ACQUIRED LANDS
Indian tribes and the Base Realignment and Closure Act:
recommendations for future trust land acquisitions. Craig A.
Jacobson, Geoffrey D. Stommer. 75 ND L Rev 509-533 (1999).
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Administrative framework of land and water management in
Australia. Alex Gardner. 16 Envtl & Plan L J 212 (1999).
Administrative versus legislative management: The impact of
discretion on water resource management in the West. Jeffrey S.
Ashley. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 223-243 (2000).
Administrative wilderness: protecting our national forestlands in
contravention of congressional intent and public policy. Brandon
Dalling. 42 Nat Resources J 385-413 (2002).
Case study on successes and failures in challenging logging
activities with adverse cumulative effects on fish and wildlife.
Laura Hartt. 32 Envtl L 671(46) (2002).
Contractor's perspective: the contractor's place in TMDL
litigation. Michael Kakuk. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 31-38
(2001).
Decontextualizing federal Indian law: the Supreme Court's 1997-98
term. Judith V. Royster. 34 Tulsa L J 329-346 (1999).
Defining wilderness: from McCloskey to legislative,
administrative and judicial paradigms. Matthew J. Ochs. 76 DU L
Rev 659-679 (1999).
Environmental law, land use, and zoning. Robert A. Lawton. 11
Widener J Pub L 213-224 (2002).
Federal-state decisionmaking on water: applying lessons learned.
David J. Hayes. 32 Envtl L Rep 11253-11262 (2002).
Indian water rights, the Missouri river, and the administrative
process: what are the questions. John H. Davidson. 24 Am Ind L
Rev 1-20 (1999).
Interpreting Indian country in State of Alaska v. Native Village
of Venetie. Kristen A. Carpenter. 35 Tulsa L J 73-161 (1999).
Last green lagoon: how and why the Bush administration should
save the Colorado River Delta. Peter W. Culp, Robert Jerome
Glennon. 28 Ecology L Q 903(89) (2002).
Long awaited Army Corps of Engineers administrative appeal
process for wetlands permits. Heather Jenquine. 6 Envtl Law
913-932 (2000).
Open meetings and open records laws: A primer for Colorado water
conservancy districts. Lee A. Miller. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
273-286 (2000).
Respecting deference: conceptualizing Skidmore within the
architecture of Chevron. Jim Rossi. 42 Wm & Mary L Rev 1105
(2001).
Shoring up Chevron: a defense of Seminole Rock deference to
agency regulatory interpretations. Scott H. Angstreich. 34 UC
Davis L Rev 49-150 (2000).
Solicitor's opinion updating Maynard and McElroy's articles (that
appeared in Volume 2 of this review). John Leshy. 3 Denv U Water
L Rev 94-97 (1999).
TMDLs at a crossroads: driven by litigation, derailed by
controversy. Nina Bell. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 61-81
(2001).
Wolves in the West: the triumph of section 10(j) of the
Endangered Species Act. Brian Bramblett. 22 Pub Land & Resources
L Rev 133-146 (2001).
AFFIDAVITS
Common title issues: An Oklahoma perspective.
44 Landman 33-46 (Sept/Oct 1999).
Timothy C. Dowd.
AFRICA
Enactment of a new arbitration law in Africa (Part 1): Creation
of a new arbitration centre. Thierry M. Lauriol. 2000 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 173-181 (No. 7, 2000).
Enactment of a new arbitration law in Africa (Part II): insertion
of the arbitration agreement in the national law of the
contracting states. Thierry M. Lauriol. 2000 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 207-212 (No. 8, 2000).
Legislative and contractual framework for oil exploration and
production in Sudan. Howayda Hassan Fawzi. 19 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 244-259 (2001).
Some consequences of OHADA for oil activities. Olivier Boisseau
Chartrain, Michael Lecerf. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
107-109 (No. 3, 2000).
South and central Africa: a review of petroleum legislation and
incentives. Gordon H. Barrows. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
47-52 (No. 3, 2001).
Towards a sustainable offshore abandonment / rehabilitation
policy in Africa: Part I. Ibibia Lucky Worika. 2000 Int'l Energy
L & Tax'n Rev 235-240 (No. 10, 2000).
Towards a sustainable offshore abandonment / rehabilitation
policy in Africa: part II. Ibibia Lucky Worika. 2000 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 266-275 (No. 11, 12 2000).
AGENCY LAW
Administrative versus legislative management: The impact of
discretion on water resource management in the West. Jeffrey S.
Ashley. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 223-243 (2000).
Barriers to successful environmental and natural resources
litigation: Tenth Circuit approaches to standing and agency
discretion. Andrew C. Lillie. 78 U Denv L Rev 193-229 (2000).
Broadening U.S. water resources project planning and evaluation.
Jeffrey W. Jacobs. 42 Nat Resources J 21-31 (2002).
Community perspective on the monument. Jim Matson. 21 (2B) J
Land Resources & Envtl L 557-560 (2001).
Decline of the hydropower czar and the rise of agency pluralism
in hydroelectric licensing. Michael C. Blumm, Viki A. Nadol. 26
Colum J Envtl L 81-130 (2001).
Environmental perspective on large ecosystem restoration
processes and the role of market, litigation, and regulation.
Daniel F. Luecke. 42 Ariz L Rev 395-432 (2000).
Environmental Quality Act as a reservoir of legislative intent a new model of interagency cooperation springs forth from the
clarification of Oklahoma's groundwater law. Darin C. Savage. 55
Okla L Rev 417-448 (2002).
Federal environmental restoration initiatives: an analysis of
agency performance and the capacity for change. Robert Jerome
Glennon, John E. Thorson. 42 Ariz L Rev 483-524 (2000).
Irrigated desert and imperiled salmon: "reclaiming" illegally
spread water via the Endangered Species Act. Peter M. Lacy. 4
Denv U Water L Rev 351-396 (2001).
NRD trustees: to what extent are they truly trustees. Laura
Rowley. 28 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 459-495 (Winter/Spring 2001).
Population segregation to species zoning: the evolution of
reintroduction law under section 10(J) of the Endangered Species
Act. Federico Cheever. 1 Wyo L Rev 287-370 (2001).
Regulatory minefield: can the Department of Interior say "no" to
hardrock mine. Christine Knight. 73 U Colo L Rev 619-671 (2002).
Regulatory traffic jams. J.B. Ruhl, James Salzman, Kai-Sheng
Song. 2 Wyo L Rev 253-289 (2002).
Solicitor's opinion updating Maynard and McElroy's articles (that
appeared in Volume 2 of this review). John Leshy. 3 Denv U Water
L Rev 94-97 (1999).
Terra firma of terra incognita? Western land use, hazardous
waste, and the devolution of U.S. federal environmental programs.
Kris Wernstedt. 40 Nat Resources J 157-183 (2000).
Transfer of federal lands: compliance with section 120(h) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act.
John F. Seymour. 27 Colum J Envtl L 173-255 (2002).
AGRICULTURE
Agricultural perspective: TMDLs in the context of a clean and
healthful environment. John Bloomquist. 22 Pub Land & Resources
L Rev 19-29 (2001).
Biodiversity in and around McElligot's pool. Scott A. Johnson,
Sandra B. Zellmer. 38 Idaho L Rev 473-504 (2002).
Border farmers, water contamination, and the NAAEC environmental
side accord to NAFTA. Margaret Wilder. 40 Nat Resources J
873-894 (2000).
Conservation easements: minimizing taxes and maximizing land.
Stephanie L. Sandre. 4 Drake J Agric L 357-372 (1999).
Farms, their environmental harms, and environmental law. J.B.
Ruhl. 27 Ecology L Q 263-349 (2000).
Ideas without institutions: the paradox of sustainable
development. A. Dan Tarlock. 9 Ind J Global Legal Stud 35-49
(2001).
Just a little bit of R-E-S-P-E-C-T for farmers. Brenda Jahns
Southwick. 19 Envtl F 49(2) (2002).
Managing state trust lands for ecosystem health: the case of
Washington State's range and agricultural lands. Gregory A.
Hicks. 6 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 1-28 (1999).
Promoting agricultural development through land use planning
limits. John C. Becker. 36 Real Prop Prob & Tr J 619-671 (2002).
Protecting the still functioning ecosystem: the case of the
Prairie Pothole wetlands. John H. Davidson. 9 Wash U J L & Pol'y
123-162 (2002).
Spreading the liability net: overcoming agricultural exemption
with EPA's proprosed co-permitting regulation under the Clean
Water Act. Rebecca P. Lewandowsi. 27 Vt L Rev 149-175 (2002).
Sustainable development and agriculture in the United States.
John H. Davidson. 32 Envtl L Rep 10543-10558 (2002).
Three questions for agriculture about the environment. J.B.
Ruhl. 17 J Land Use & Envtl L 395-408 (2002).
TMDL program: land use and other implications. Ron Jones, Jim
Vergura. 6 Drake J Agric L 317-331 (2001).
When voluntary, incentive-based controls fail: structuring a
regulatory response to agricultural nonpoint source water
pollution. Douglas R. Williams. 9 Wash U J L & Pol'y 21-121
(2002).
AIR POLLUTION / AIR QUALITY
Agricultural perspective: TMDLs in the context of a clean and
healthful environment. John Bloomquist. 22 Pub Land & Resources
L Rev 19-29 (2001).
Assessing benefits of ground-level ozone: what role for science
in setting national air quality standards. Howard Gruenspecht,
Randall Lutter. 15 Tul Envtl L J 85-96 (2001).
Background sources of benzene complicate indoor air sampling at a
petroleum release site. Carolyn Boben, Randi Carlson, William
Phillips. 14 Envtl Claims J 223-233 (2002).
Can the "clear skies initiative" reduce the coordination failure
in new source review and cooperative federalism under the Clean
Air Act. Todd B. Adams. 16 Tulane Envtl L J 127-165 (2002).
Clean and healthful environment and original intent. C.B.
McNeil. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 83-95 (2001).
Compliance under Title V: yes, no, or I don't know. John C.
Evans, D.R. van der Vaart. 21 Va Envtl L J 1-70 (2002).
Contractor's perspective: the contractor's place in TMDL
litigation. Michael Kakuk. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 31-38
(2001).
Department of Environmental Quality's perspective: TMDLs in
Montana. Art Compton. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 39-46
(2001).
Empowering tribes - the District of Columbia Circuit upholds
tribal authority to regulate air quality throughout reservation
lands. Kristina Marie Reader. 12 Vill Envtl L J 295-330 (2001).
Federalism and environmental regulation: a public choice
analysis. Richard L. Revesz. 115 Harv L Rev 553-641 (2001).
Kyoto protocol on climate change and the challenges to its
implementation: a commentary. Ved P. Nanda. 10 Colo J Int'l
Envtl L & Pol'y 319-343 (1999).
Lesson for conservation from pollution control law: cooperative
federalism for recovery under the Endangered Species Act. Robert
L. Fischman, Jaelith Hall-Rivera. 27 Colum J Envtl L 45-172
(2002).
Markets and geography: designing marketable permit schemes to
control local and regional pollutants. Jonathan Remy Nasy,
Richard L. Revesz. 28 Ecology L Q 569(97) (2001).
Ninth Circuit upholds administrative orders against facilties for
state's violation of the Clean Air Act. Tara McBrien. 16 Tulane
Envtl L J 189-197 (2002).
Question of intent: the Montana Constitution, environmental
rights, and the MEIC decision. Cameron Carter, Kyle Karinen. 22
Pub Land & Resources L Rev 97-132 (2001).
Redesigning tribal trust law under section 164(c) of the Clean
Air Act. Ann Juliano. 35 Tulsa L J 37-54 (1999).
Sustainable development and air quality: the need to replace
basic technologies with cleaner alternatives. David M. Driesen.
32 Envtl L Rep 10277-10290 (2002).
Sustainable development and air quality: the need to replace
basic technologies with cleaner alternatives. David M. Driesen.
32 Envtl L Rep 10277-10290 (2002).
Timber industry perspective: TMDLs and forestry, trying to make a
square peg round. Brian Sugden. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev
47-60 (2001).
TMDLs at a crossroads: driven by litigation, derailed by
controversy. Nina Bell. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 61-81
(2001).
Who owns the sky? Clean air as a public trust. Gerald Torres. 19
Pace Envtl L Rev 515-574 (2002).
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
2002 land use ADR report. Jonathan Davidson, Susan Trevarthen.
34 Urb Law 919-926 (2002).
Fair division of natural resources. David A. Anderson. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 227-245 (2000-01).
Have you ever wondered? What is alternative dispute resolution
and what relevance does it have to me as a landman. Bill
Patterson. 45 Landman 11-12 (Nov/Dec 2000).
International dispute resolution: drafting mediation, choice of
forum and arbitration clauses. R. Doak Bishop, Mont P. Hoyt.
2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 7-15 (No. 1, 2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Offshore construction projects - disputes and their resolution.
Mark Morrison, Alex Panayides. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
113-119 (No. 6, 2001).
Overcoming the barriers to environmental dispute resolution in
Canada. Darshan Brasch, Patrick Field, Lawrence E. Susskind,
William Tilleman. 81 Can Bar Rev 396-430 (2002).
Transnational energy litigation & ADR methods. . 36 Tex Int'l L J
2-10 (2001).
ANTITRUST
Deregulation and merger enforcement in the natural gas industry.
David Balto, James Mongoven. 69 Antitrust L J 527-568 (2001).
Discussion of McMahon Foundation vs. Amerada Hess - the oil
antitrust litigation. Ronald O. Holman. 45 Landman 43-47
(Sept/Oct 2000).
APPROPRIATION
Future of appropriation in the new West. A. Dan Tarlock. 41 Nat
Resources J 769-793 (2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2002).
Maintaining the status quo: protecting established water uses in
the Pacific northwest, despite the rules of prior appropriation.
Reed D. Benson. 28 Envtl L 881-918 (1998), reprinted in 37 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
ARBITRATION
Arbitration in the energy/minerals field: customizing the clause.
Eileen Vernon. 56 Disp Resol J 48(13) (2001).
International dispute resolution: drafting mediation, choice of
forum and arbitration clauses. R. Doak Bishop, Mont P. Hoyt.
2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 7-15 (No. 1, 2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Practical guide for drafting international arbitration clauses.
R. Doak Bishop. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 16-40 (No. 1,
2000).
Practical issues in arbitration proceedings. Guy Hardaker. 2000
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 276-281 (No. 11,12 2000).
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Evaluation of the effectiveness of cultural resource laws in
criminal prosecution for theft of archeological and cultural
resources from federal lands. Glenna J. Sheveland. 28 New Eng J
on Crim & Civ Confinement 27-60 (2002).
ARCTIC
Arctic environmental protection strategy, Arctic council and
multilateral environmental initiatives: tinkering while the
Arctic marine environment totters. Stacey Ferrara, Rob Huebert,
David VanderZwaag. 30 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 131(41) (2002).
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, correlative rights, and
Sourdough: not just for bread anymore. Robert W. Corbisier. 19
Alaska L Rev 393(39) (2002).
Drilling for oil underneath the Arctic's coastal plain: proposal
for another Prudhoe Bay environmental disaster. Eleanor A. Hunt.
8 Envtl Law 189-213 (2001).
Frozen assets? Alaskan oil's threat to national energy security.
L. Hunter Lovins, Amory Lovins. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
135-139 (No. 7, 2001).
Information is Alaska's greatest untapped resource. Samantha K.
Sherman. 8 Envtl Law 215-238 (2001).
Like wilderness, but need oil? Securing America's Future Energy
Act puts little between accident-prone oil companies and the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Samuel Stanke. 32 Envtl L
905(38) (2002).
Now is the time to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Linda Nichols. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 463-468 (2003).
ASSESSMENT WORK
Return to certainty in risk assessment, management and transfer:
The journey of the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act. Thomas R.
Fox. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 18-27 (No. 1, 2001).
AUDITS - ENVIRONMENTAL
Failure of watershed analysis under the Northwest Forest Plan: a
case study of the Gifford Pinchot National Forest. Brent Foster.
5 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 337-358 (1999).
AUDITS - FINANCIAL
Impact of changing regulations on audit committees of energy
firms. Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 179-187
(2001).
Information effects associated with the GCOs in the oil and gas
industry: contagion or competitive. K. Michael Casey, Mark
Schaub, Anita B. Williams. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 731-743 (2003).
Non-audit fees in the energy sector: a preliminary analysis.
Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 60-66
(2001).
Provision for non-audit services and the low-balling of audit
fees for firms in the oil and gas industry. D. Larry Crumbley,
Donald Deis, Santanu Mitra, Kenny Reynolds. 21 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 87-109 (2002).
Some determinants of audit report lag in the energy sector.
Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 541-547 (2003).
AUSTRALIA
Accounting for extractive industries: an Australian perspective.
Nasser Spear, Trevor Wise. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 30-53
(2000).
Acid sulfate soils: the environmental time bomb. David Jones. 7
Australasian J Nat Resources L & Pol'y 1-46 (2000).
Acquisitions and disposals of mining interests under a uniform
capital allowances regime. Aileen Ch'ng, David Ireland. 21
Australian Min & Petroleum L J 62-76 (2002).
Administrative framework of land and water management in
Australia. Alex Gardner. 16 Envtl & Plan L J 212 (1999).
Appeals against administrative decisions affecting water
resources. Alex Gardner. 17 Envtl & Plan L J 341 (2000).
Beyond public native forest logging: National Forest Policy and
Regional Forest agreements after South East Queensland. A.J.
Brown. 18 Envtl & Plan L J 189(22) (2001).
Beyond public native forest logging: National Forest Policy and
Regional Forest agreements after South East Queensland. A.J.
Brown. 18 Envtl & Plan L J 71(22) (Feb 2002).
Changes to Queensland coal seam gas regime. Cathy Atkinson, Ben
Zillmann. 21 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 145-152 (2002).
Compensation and native title rights in Australia and aboriginal
rights in Canada: an overview. David Bursey, Robyn Glindemann.
20 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 286-305 (2001).
Conflict over water resources in Queensland: all eyes on the
Lower Balonne. Poh-Ling Tan. 17 Envtl & Plan L J 545 (2000).
Crisis in corporate confidence: the regulatory response. Michael
Dulaney, Sharon Wilson. 21 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J
162-178 (2002).
Dealings and registrations. Katherin Domansky. 20 Australasian
Min & Petroleum L J 36-45 (2001).
Defects in marking out in applications for mining titles: a
comparison of the requisite levels of compliance under the
general law and the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (QLD). Trent
Glover. 19 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 230-246 (2000).
Defects in marking out in applications for mining titles: A
comparison of the requisite levels of compliance under the
general law and the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (QLD). Trent
Glover. 19 Australian Min & Petroleum L J 230-246 (2000).
Environmental revolution in the Queensland mining industry or
just a changing of the guard? An analysis of the new regime for
the environmental regulation of mining under the EPA (QLD).
Jacqueline Peel. 20 Australian Min & Petroleum L J 137-147
(2001).
Evicting people from nature: indigenous land rights and national
parks in Australia, Russia, and the United States. David
Ostergren, Robert Poirier. 42 Nat Resources J 331-351 (2002).
Farm - in arrangements in the mining industry: the GST
implications. Tania Mykyta. 19 Australian Min & Petroleum L J
247-258 (2000).
Farm - in arrangements in the mining industry: The GST
implications. Tania Mykyta. 19 Australian Min & Petroleum L J
247-258 (2000).
First contested mainland native title determination. Richard
Bartlett. 21 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 187-197 (2002).
Impact of the goods and services tax on the oil and gas industry
in Australia. Chris Sievers. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev
358-363 (No. 12, 1999).
Implied obligations in a deed of settlement. Jill Howieson,
Chris Stevenson. 21 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 179-184
(2002).
Integrated land and water management in New South Wales: plans,
problems and possibilities. Margaret Bond, Maria Comino, David
Farrier, Andrew H H Kelly. 5 Australasian J Nat Resources L &
Pol'y 153-185 (1998).
Is it time for a new model of water quality laws. Jennifer
McKay, Anthony Moeller. 17 Envtl & Plan L J 165 (2000).
Is there power in the Australian constitution to make federal
laws for water quality. Jennifer McKay, Anthony Moeller. 17
Envtl & Plan L J 294 (2000).
Long term gas sales agreements: Trade Practices Act implications.
Peter Rose. 20 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 165-185 (2001).
Management of acid sulphate soils in New South Wales - policy,
organisation, and regulation. Mitch Tulau. 6 Australasian J Nat
Resources L & Pol'y 1-32 (1999).
Mining and the environment in Queensland: where the law begins
and enforcement fails - regulatory capture and implementation
failure. Drew Hutton. 6 Australasian J Nat Resources L & Pol'y
149-173 (1999).
National third party access code for natural gas pipeline
systems: a balancing act. Lewis McDonald. 22 Australian
Resources & Energy L J 81-88 (2003).
Native title and aboriginal heritage issues affecting oil and gas
exploration and production in Australia. Michael W Hunt. 19 J
Energy & Nat Resources L 364-386 (2001).
Native title and environmental planning: indigenous land use
agreements. Donna Craig. 17 Envtl & Plan L J 440 (2000).
Offshore petroleum: a sniff of legislative change in Australia.
Angus Jones, David Kwei. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 4-6 (No.
1, 2000).
Project financing in the energy industry and its impact on
completion risk. Scott McConnel. 20 Australian Mining &
Petroleum L J 148-164 (2001).
Proposed Timor Sea arrangements between Australia and the East
Timor transitional administration. Gillian Triggs. 20 J Energy &
Nat Resources L 40-49 (2002).
Proprietary nature of overriding royalties in petroleum
agreements in Australia. Geoffrey Compton. 21 Australian Mining
& Petroleum L J 152-161 (2002).
Public participation and integrated planning in the Tasmanian
Private Timber Reserve process. Dianne Gee, Elaine Stratford. 18
Envtl & Plan L J 54(17) (2002).
Recent developments. Pat Brazil, Louise Turner. 19 Australian
Mining & Petroleum L J 187-214 (2000).
Recent developments - Commonwealth. Robert Watson. 21 Australian
Mining & Petroleum L J 111-114 (2002).
Recent developments - Commonwealth. Gregory French. 18 Austl
Mining & Petroleum L J 201-202 (1999).
Recent developments - New South Wales. Christopher Knott, Lisa
Ziegert. 21 Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 114-123 (2002).
Recent developments - New South Wales. Tony J. Wassaf. 18 Austl
Mining & Petroleum L J 202-210 (1999).
Recent developments - Northern Territory. Christopher Knott. 21
Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 123-125 (2002).
Recent developments - Northern Territory. Christopher Knott. 18
Austl Mining & Petroleum L J 210-212 (1999).
Recent developments - Queensland. Rachel Scarrabelotti. 21
Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 125-130 (2002).
Recent developments - South Australia. Melissa Holzberger. 21
Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 130-131 (2002).
Recent developments - South Australia. Jennifer Tobin. 18 Austl
Mining & Petroleum L J 212-213 (1999).
Recent developments - Victoria. Caroline Kelly. 21 Australian
Mining & Petroleum L J 131-136 (2002).
Recent developments - Victoria. Stuart Lawrance. 18 Austl Mining
& Petroleum L J 213-214 (1999).
Recent developments - Western Australia. Benita Ross. 21
Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 137-144 (2002).
Recent developments - Western Australia. Mark Gerus, David Wood.
18 Austl Mining & Petroleum L J 214-220 (1999).
Regional forest agreements - policy, legislative and planning
framework to achieve sustainable forest management in Australia.
Tony Bartlett. 16 Envtl & Plan L J 328 (1999).
Regulation of commercial gas storage operations in western
Australia. Darren Murphy. 20 Australian Min & Petroleum L J
65-77 (2001).
Seabed claims under the aboriginal land rights (Northern
Territory) Act 1976. Neville Henwood, Lauren Jarvinen. 21
Australian Mining & Petroleum L J 185-187 (2002).
Stock exchange listing rules and disclosure of reserves in the
extractive industries. Malik Mirza. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 57-79
(2001).
Uranium mining: use and disposal law in Australia: the case for a
cradle-to-grave philosophy. Chris McGrath. 17 Envtl & Plan L J
502 (2000).
Water, water everywhere...": but is any of it subject to offshore
native title claims in Australia. Gary D. Meyers. 9 Int'l Legal
Persp 93-128 (Spring/Fall 1997).
What's new about water rights. Paul Frederick. 40 L Soc'y J
50(4) (2002).
Whose right? the adequacy of the law governing coal seam gas
development in Queensland. Susan Johnston. 20 Australian Mining
& Petroleum L J 258-285 (2001).
BANKRUPTCY
Bankruptcy issues in oil and gas. David W. Elmquist. 45 Landman
33-44 (Jan/Feb 2000).
Bankruptcy law - what industry needs to know. Richard K.
Thompson. 46 Landman 45-52 (Sept/Oct 2001).
Effect of Enron's bankruptcy on the valuation of companies in the
oil, gas and energy industry. Chih-Chen Lee, Ena Rose-Green,
Clark M. Wheatley. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 469-478 (2003).
BOUNDARIES
Transboundary jurisdiction and watercourse law: China, Kazakhstan
and the Irtysh. Eric W. Sivers. 37 Tex Int'l L J 1-42 (2002).
BRAZIL
New chapter in Brazil's oil industry: opening the market while
protecting the environment. Adriana Lieders. 13 Geo Int'l Envtl
L Rev 881-899 (2001).
New oil and gas industry in Brazil: an overview of the main legal
aspects. Marilda Rosado de Sa Ribveiro. 36 Tex Int'l L J 141-166
(2001).
Recent alterations to the Repetro regime - Brazilian special
customs regime for export and import of goods destined to the oil
and gas industry. Gustavo Goiabeira de Oliveira, Andre Gomes de
Oliveira. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 200-201 (No. 8, 2002).
Recent issues in the Brazilian oil and gas sector. Fabio
Carvalho, Maria Alice Doria. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 291-292
(No. 9/10, 1999).
Repetro fosters Brazilian oil and gas industry. Andres Gomes de
Oliveira, Gustavo Goiabeira de Oliveira. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 60-61 (No. 3, 2001).
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Creating new opportunities for ecosystem restoration on public
lands: An analysis of the potential for Bureau of Land Management
lands. Steven C. Forrest. 23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 21-75
(2002).
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY
Investor relationship management (IRM). Jim Hoffman. 21
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 109-114 (2002).
CANADA
Aboriginal forestry: community management as opportunity and
imperative. Deborah Curran, Michael M'Gonigle. 37 Osgoode Hall L
J 711-774 (1999).
Are royalty agreements required for Canada east coast offshore
oil and gas. Alan E. Pettie. 24 Dalhousie L J 151-213 (2001).
Aspects of international petroleum agreements. Don Greenfield,
Bob Rooney. 37 Alta L Rev 352-386 (1999).
Basic derivatives for the oil and gas company. Mark R. Smith. 39
Alta L Rev 152-179 (2001).
Bre-X hoax: a south east Asian bubble. Christopher C. Nicholls.
32 Can Bus L J 173-222 (1999).
Canada - U.S. softwood lumber dispute: is Canada stumped again.
James Duvall, Billy Garton. 36 Canadian Bus L J 201-237 (2002).
Canada's mining flow-through share. Ian J. Gamble. 28 Tax Notes
Int'l 75-86 (2002).
Canadian federalism and environmental protection. Neil Hawke. 14
J Envtl L 185-196 (2002).
Canadian finance minister proposes amendments to resource tax
regime. Brian R. Carr, Christopher P. Moser. 19 Tax Notes Int'l
797-800 (1999).
Canadian perspective on the Devil's Lake outlet: toward an
environmental assessment model for the management of
transboundary disputes. Sheryl A. Rosenberg. 76 ND L Rev 817-859
(2000).
Comparative overview of the unbundling of gas distribution
services in North America - lessons for Nova Scotia and New
Brunswick. Elizabeth L. Bhar, Mark E. MacDonald. 38 Alta L Rev
1-46 (2000).
Drainage issues in the Atlantic Canada offshore petroleum
industry. Robert G. Grant, Richard A. Neufeld. 24 Dalhousie L J
127-150 (2002).
East coast project financing. Raymond E. Quesnel, R. J.
Thrasher. 24 Dalhousie L J 215-278 (2001).
Electric deregulation in Canada: an idea which has yet to be
tried. Andrew J. Roman. 40 Alta L Rev 97-130 (2002).
Electricity competition and fair market access in Canada.
Alexander J. Black. 20 Energy L J 291-324 (1999).
Energy policy for the 21st century. David J. Jhirad. 28 Can-US
LJ 315-335 (Annual 2002).
Energy regulation and the role of the market. Keith F. Miller.
37 Alta L Rev 419-438 (1999).
Environmental harm in developing countries caused by subsidiaries
of Canadian mining corporations: the interface of public and
private international law. Sara L. Seck. 37 Can YB Int'l L
139-221 (1999).
Environmental implications of the discovery and delivery of new
energy resources in the Canada/U.S. context. James E. Hickey,
Jr.. 28 Can-US LJ 209-218 (Annual 2002).
Environmental implications of the discovery and delivery of new
energy resources in the Canadian context. David Luff. 28 Can-US
LJ 219-235 (Annual 2002).
Environmental protection and oil and gas production in the Nova
Scotia offshore: a guidelines approach to operational discharges.
Mikis Manolis. 40 Alta L Rev 347-365 (2002).
Environmental regime for development of an oil and gas project in
the Newfoundland offshore. Alexander MacDonald, Gerlinde van
Driel. 40 Alta L Rev 131-164 (2002).
Environmental regulation of the mining industry in Canada: an
update of legal and regulatory requirements. Joseph F.
Castrilli. 34 U BC L Rev 91-158 (2000).
Financial responsibility requirements for oil and gas activities
offshore Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. Boris B. de Jonge. 24
Dalhousie L J 109-126 (2001).
Force majeure - beyond boilerplate. Dirk J. Meeuwig, Joni R.
Paulus. 37 Alta L Rev 302-315 (1999).
Forest management and environmental values: Ontario's old growth
pinelands. Jamie Benidickson. 9 J Envtl l & Prac 93-117 (2000).
Governing lands and waters: limits to reserve title and Indian
Act powers in British Columbia, and proposals for reform. Peter
R. Grant, David Schulze. 34 U Brit Colum L Rev 415-457 (2001).
Hazardous waste? The criminal law power, federal environmental
jurisdiction, and Ottawa's policy since R. v. Hydro-Quebec. Amir
Attaran. 49 U NB L J 97-133 (2000).
Hostile takeover bids: defensive strategies. Richard A. Shaw. 38
Alta L Rev 111-142 (2000).
Impact of recommended changes on the oil and gas sector. Richard
M. Hyndman. Corp Mgmt Tax Conf CH11(10) (1998).
Legal considerations in the development of coalbed methane.
Michael J. Laffin. 39 Alta L Rev 127-151 (2001).
Legal framework in the Canadian offshore. Van Penick. 24
Dalhousie L J 1-22 (2001).
Legal implications of decommissioning and reclamation plans for
potash mine sites in Saskatchewan. Greg Potter. 10 J Int'l L &
Prac 57-87 (2000).
Legal principles surrounding the new Canadian and American Arctic
energy debate. Alexander J. Black. 23 Energy L J 81-126 (2002).
Lessons of Bre-X. Jeffrey G. MacIntosh. 32 Can Bus L J 223-240
(1999).
Light-handed regulation. Nikol J. Schultz. 37 Alta L Rev 387-418
(1999).
Limitations Act and oil and gas transactions. Allan D. Nielsen,
Darwin A. Schofer. 37 Alta L Rev 285-301 (1999).
Make mine mining. Michael Lewis. 26 Canadian Law 8(4) (2002).
McArthur river uranium mine environmental assessment process.
Helen Cotton. 9 J Envtl L & Prac 71-91 (1999).
McArthur river uranium mine environmental assessment process reply. Mark Wittrup. 9 J Envtl L & Prac 299-301 (2000).
Midstream assets: issues emerging from a changing business. J.
Jay Park. 38 Alta L Rev 47-73 (2000).
Mineral project disclosure standards - as assessment of recent
Canadian experience. John M. Sibley. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources
L 364-378 (2002).
NAFTA and the environment: an update. Janine Ferretti. 28 Can-US
LJ 81-99 (Annual 2002).
Negotiation and native titles: why common law courts are not
proper fora for determining native land title issues. Geoffrey
Robert Schiveley. 33 Vanderbilt J Transnat'l L 427 (2000).
Oceans Act: uncharted seas for offshore development in Atlantic
Canada. Alan Chircop, Bruce A. Marchand. 24 Dalhousie L J 23-50
(2001).
Offshore oil and gas facility decommissioning in Nova Scotia and
Newfoundland. Philip Abraham. 24 Dalhousie L J 333-360 (2001).
Oil and gas development in western Canada in the new millennium:
the changing legal framework in the Northwest Territories, the
Yukon, and offshore British Columbia. Sandy Carpenter, Cecilia
A. Low, John Olynyk. 39 Alta L Rev 1-34 (2001).
Oil and water: an offshore oil and gas boom is dumping a ton of
cash into Atlantic Canada's economy, but the question remains
whether much of it will trickle down to local law firms. Dean
Jobb. 24 Can Law 33(4) (2000).
Overcoming the barriers to environmental dispute resolution in
Canada. Darshan Brasch, Patrick Field, Lawrence E. Susskind,
William Tilleman. 81 Can Bar Rev 396-430 (2002).
Parks legislation in Canada: a comparison of the new Canada
National Parks Act and Ontario's existing Provincial Parks Act.
John Swaigen. 10 J Envtl L & Prac 223-236 (2001).
Press looks at the problem of reconciling the meeting of energy
demands with environmental protection: a Canadian journalist's
perspective. Christopher Waddell. 28 Can US LJ 187-205 (Annual
2002).
Press looks at the problem of reconciling the meeting of energy
demands with environmental protection: an American reporter's
perspective. Emilia Askari. 28 Can-US LJ 183-186 (Annual 2002).
Primer on conducting oil and gas operations in the northern Rocky
Mountain states: a strange new world. John R. Lee. 38 Alta L Rev
74-110 (2000).
Provincial regulation of natural resource exploitation (includes
discussion). Martin Kaga. 28 Can-US LJ 357-376 (Annual 2002).
Recent cases on the calculation of royalties on First Nations'
lands. Nigel Bankes, L. Douglas Rae. 38 Alta L Rev 258-293
(2000).
Recent developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers. Mungo
Hardwicke-Brown, Sandy McLeod, Chris Orr. 40 Alta L Rev 215-297
(2002).
Recent judicial developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers.
Julio N. Arboleda, Frank R. Foran, Stephen C. Lee. 39 Alta L Rev
180-259 (2001).
Recent judicial developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers.
Geoffrey D. Baker, Catherine A. Crang. 37 Alta L Rev 439-483
(1999).
Recent judicial developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers.
Nigel Bankes, Alicia Quesnel. 38 Alta L Rev 294-363 (2000).
Recent legislative and regulatory updates of interest to oil and
gas lawyers. Janice Buckingham, Jason Dubchak, Conni Gibson,
Mark Smith. 38 Alta L Rev 170-257 (2000).
Recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to oil
and gas lawyers. Marie H. Buchinski, C. Kemm Yates. 39 Alta L
Rev 260-333 (2001).
Recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to oil
and gas lawyers. Luigi A. Cusano, David M. Wood. 40 Alta L Rev
165-214 (2002).
Recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to oil
and gas lawyers. Alan S. Hollingsworth, David M. Wood. 37 Alta L
Rev 484-523 (1999).
Reconciling energy and environmental policy. F. Michael Cleland.
28 Can-US LJ 511-531 (Annual 2002).
Reflections on National Energy Board regulation 1959-98: from
persuasion to prescription and on to partnership. Roland
Priddle. 37 Alta L Rev 524-548 (1999).
Regulatory reform in the British Columbia petroleum industry: the
Oil and Gas Commission. Patricia Burchmore, Sandy Carpenter,
Christopher Jones, Murray Rankin. 38 Alta L Rev 143-169 (2000).
Regulatory regime: Canada - Newfoundland / Nova Scotia offshore
petroleum board issues. Jim Dickey, Angus Taylor. 24 Dalhousie L
J 51-86 (2001).
Resource development and human rights: a look at the case of the
Lubicon Cree Indian Nation of Canada. Andrew Huff. 10 Colo J
Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 161-194 (1999).
Review of the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and the Canada Oil
and Gas Operations Act as the legal framework for future
development in the Northwest Territories. Raymond E. Quesnel. 40
Alta L Rev 83-96 (2002).
Rights of first refusal in oil and gas transactions: a
progressive analysis. Clifford D. Johnson, David J. Stanford. 37
Alta L Rev 316-351 (1999).
Root of Canada's taxing power in the mining industry. Ian J.
Gamble. 24 Tax Notes Int'l 689-702 (2001).
Securing assets of oil and gas projects offshore Nova Scotia.
Robert W. Carmichael. 24 Dalhousie L J 279-315 (2001).
Strengthening environmental assessment of Canadian supported
mining ventures in developing countries. Sara L. Seck. 11 J
Envtl L & Prac 1-82 (2001).
Sustainable environmental rights in Canada. Elaine L. Hughes,
David Iyalomhe. 30 Ottawa L Rev 229-258 (1999).
Sustaining old growth pinelands in Ontario: pathways to reform.
Jamie Benidickson. 9 J Envtl L & Prac 199-226 (2000).
Tough duty: U.S. - Canada softwood lumber relations in 2001.
Monte Mills. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 101-110 (2001).
Tulsequah Chief Mine and the fate of the Taku river. Carolyn R.
Herb. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 107-120 (2000).
Water wars: Canada's upstream battle to ban bulk water export.
Cynthia Baumann. 10 Minn J Global Trade 109-132 (2001).
World petroleum legislation: frameworks that foster oil and gas
development. William T. Onorato, J. Jay Park. 39 Alta L Rev
70-126 (2001).
CARRIED INTEREST
Preservation of overriding royalties - now you see them, now you
don't. John R. Woodward. 45 Landman 51-62 (Sept/Oct 2000).
CHILE
Native forest protection in Chile: the inadequacies of the recent
environmental framework law and relevant multilateral
instruments. Hale E. Sheppard. 14 J Envtl L & Litig 225-299
(1999).
Timber certification: an alternative solution to the destruction
of Chilean forests. Hale E. Sheppard. 14 J Envtl L & Litig
301-350 (1999).
CHINA
China is inching towards a market economy in the petroleum
sector. D. Larry Crumbley, Sonia Wasan. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 38-49 (2002).
Chinese mining law overview. Wang Bei, William L MacBride, Jr..
19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 220-229 (2001).
Evolution of an international water resources management regime
in the Mekong river basin. Greg Browder, Leonard Ortolano. 40
Nat Resources J 499-531 (2000).
Illegal traffic of timber in Cambodia. Jennifer Lynn Peters.
Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 102-112 (1999).
Investing in China's gas projects. Peter Roberts. 2001 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 77-80 (No. 4, 2001).
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
Mining legislation and foreign mining investments in China.
Guillaume P. Blanc. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 301-320 (No.
12, 2002).
Protection of wildlife and endangered species in China. Lawrence
Watters, Wang Xi. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 489-524 (2002).
CLEAN WATER ACT OF 1977
It's all about what you know: the specific intent standard should
govern "knowing" violations of the Clean Water Act. Randall S.
Abate, Dayna E. Mancuso. 9 NYU Envtl L J 304-339 (2001).
COAL
Ute Indians not entitled to gases under the Coal Lands Acts of
1909 and 1910. Anita Starchman Bryant. 27 Ecology L Q 799-818
(2000).
COAL MINING
Eleventh amendment challenge to mountaintop coal mining. Michael
G. Crotty. 13 Vill Envtl L J 287-313 (2002).
Mine is a terrible thing to waste: past, present and future
reclamation efforts to correct the environmentally damaging
effects of coal mines. A. Brooke Rubenstein, David Winkowski. 13
Vill Envtl L J 189-215 (2002).
Recent developments in mountaintop removal mining: West Virginia
rivers are not the coal industry's private dump. Benjamin
Diamond. 6 Envtl Law 891-912 (2000).
COALBED GAS
Coal versus gas: Who gets the mine, and who gets the shaft.
Peter A. Bjork, Steven E. Marlin. 46 Landman 55-69 (March/April
2001).
Coalbed methane primer. Randy Allen. 47 Landman 25-32 (Mar/Apr
2002).
Debunking the natural gas "clean energy" myth: coalbed methane on
Wyoming's Powder River Basin. Amy W. Beatie, Thomas F. Darin. 31
Envtl L Rep 10566-10602 (2001).
Deluge: Potential solutions to emerging conflicts regarding onlease and off-lease surface damage caused by coal bed methane
production. M. Kristeen Hand, Kyle R. Smith. 1 Wyo L Rev 661-693
(2001).
Did the Eleventh Circuit crack "frac?" Hydraulic fracturing after
the court's landmark LEAF decision (Legal Environmental
Assistance Foundation). Markus G. Puder. 18 Va Envtl L J 507-554
(1999).
Final solution to the battle over ownership of coalbed methane
gas. Laura D. Windsor. 17 Ga St U L Rev 893-920 (2001).
Legal considerations in the development of coalbed methane.
Michael J. Laffin. 39 Alta L Rev 127-151 (2001).
Quandary or quest: Problems of developing coalbed methane as an
energy resource. Kathy Jean Flaherty. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl
L 71-105 (1999-2000), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2000).
Solicitor's opinion updating Maynard and McElroy's articles (that
appeared in Volume 2 of this review). John Leshy. 3 Denv U Water
L Rev 94-97 (1999).
Southern Ute: Trial Court to Supreme Court. Jill M. Harrison,
Elizabeth A. McClanahan. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 247-265
(2000-01).
COASTAL ZONE
Federal consistency requirements of the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972: it's time to repeal this fundamentally flawed
legislation. Bruce Kuhse. 6 Ocean & Coastal L J 77-108 (2001).
COLOMBIA
Fourth generation association contracts in Colombia: has the
model been exhausted. Armando Zamora. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 41-45 (No. 2, 2001).
Transactional, social, and legal aspects of oil exploration and
extraction in Colombia. Juan Carlos Palau. 22 Nw J Int'l L & Bus
35-46 (2002).
COMMODITY FUTURES
How hedging and futures relate to exploration, production and
landmen. Bryan Guderian. 46 Landman 11-18 (Sept/Oct 2001).
Price discovery and behavior in crude, gasoline, and heating oil
futures. Bahram Adrangi, Arjun Chatrath. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q
279-300 (2002).
COMPUTERS
2000 recommended websites for wetlands law. I. Wes Wheeler. 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 305-321 (2000).
Enterprise database systems in the oil and energy industry.
Raymond Jeffords, Marsha A. Scheidt, Greg M. Thibadoux. 51 Oil
Gas & Energy Q 493-510 (2003).
Evaluation of the usefulness of web-based financial and
environmental performance information provided by oil and gas
companies. Janice Carr, Kathryn A.S. Lancaster, Carolyn A.
Strand. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 591-606 (2002).
Investor relationship management (IRM). Jim Hoffman. 21
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 109-114 (2002).
NAPE online brings e-commerce to the oil and gas industry. James
R. McNeil. 45 Landman 22-24 (Jan/Feb 2000).
Reporting issues for year 2000 in the oil and gas industry.
Luann Bean, Bill D. Jarnagin, Charles Nichols. 18 Petroleum Acct
& Fin Mgmt J 111-128 (1999).
Using the web to determine the reasonableness of payments to
royalty owners and non-operators. Christopher K. Alguire,
Jonathan E. Ellis. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 18-35 (2003).
Web resources for the oil, gas and energy industry. Steve
Olshewsky, L. Murphy Smith. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 883-896 (2001).
CONDEMNATION
Condemnation without compensation: How environmental eminent
domain diminishes the value of Montana's school trust lands.
Michael J. Mortimer. 8 Dickinson J Envtl L & Pol'y 243-271
(1999).
Constitutional law: inverse condemnation: Supreme Court gives
property owners new rights. Brent L. Slipka. 78 ND L Rev 177-200
(2002).
Inverse condemnation in Idaho. Andrew Wright, Edward F. Wroe. 45
Advoc 22-24 (2002).
Selected issues in federal condemnations for underground natural
gas storage rights: valuation methods, inverse condemnations, and
trespass. Steven D. McGrew. 51 Case W Res L Rev 131-185 (2000).
CONSERVATION
"Forest must come first": Gifford Pinchot's conservation ethic
and the Gifford Pinchot National Forest - the ideal and the
reality. Susan Jane M. Brown. 11 Fordham Envtl L J 137-205
(1999).
Adaptive management: how water law needs to change. Janet C.
Neuman. 31 Envtl L Rep 11432-11437 (2001).
Analyzing conflicts between Indian treaty rights and federal
conservation regulations: are state regulation standards
appropriate. Elizabeth Roat. 84 Marq L Rev 701-721 (2001).
Before and after valuation of conservation easements.
Christopher J. Kayser. 27 J Real Estate Tax'n 184-207 (2000).
Biodiversity conservation and the intermixed ownership problem:
from nature reserves to collaborative processes. Robert B.
Keiter. 38 Idaho L Rev 301-324 (2002).
Biodiversity conservation in the United States: a case study in
incompleteness and indirection. A. Dan Tarlock. 32 Envtl L Rep
10529-10542 (2002).
Bureau of Land Management National Conservation Areas: legitimate
conservation or Satan's spawn. Andy Kerr, Mark Salvo. 20 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 67(11) (2002).
Changing economic role of natural landscapes in the West: moving
beyond an extractive and tourist perspective. Thomas Michael
Power. 31 Envtl L Rep 10438-10451 (2001).
Clark panel: questions and answers. . 27 Ecology L Q 1175 (2001).
Conservation connections in a fragmented desert environment: the
U.S. - Mexico border. Susan Lieberman Goodwin. 40 Nat Resources
J 989-1016 (2000).
Conservation easements and the public good: preserving the
environment on private lands. Peter M. Morrisette. 41 Nat
Resources J 373-426 (2001).
Conservation easements: important tools to preserve land.
Richard J. Langer, Johanna J. Londeon. 75 Wis Law 10(9) (2002).
Conservation easements: minimizing taxes and maximizing land.
Stephanie L. Sandre. 4 Drake J Agric L 357-372 (1999).
Conservation issues on military lands: some thoughts on a
framework for successful mission integration. Louis J. Puleo. 17
J Land Use & Envtl L 431-439 (2002).
Conservation of trust funds. Marianne Guerin-McManus. 20 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 1(24) (2002).
Conservation options: toward a greater private role. Barton H.
Thompson, Jr.. 21 Va Envtl L J 245-315 (2002).
Continuing violations doctrine and the Clean Water Act: untenable
solutions and a need for reform. David S. Foster. 32 Envtl L
717(30) (2002).
Critical evaluation of the development and implementation of
forest preservation strategies. Ryan K. McKain. 15 Conn J Int'l
L 235-259 (2000).
Culture v. conservation: does a proposed special regulation
threaten the integrity of the National Park System. Todd L.
Tisdale. 29 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 111-141 (2001).
Do conservation easements and water mix (in Colorado). Peter D.
Nichols. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 504-524 (2002).
Embryo, not fossil: breathing life into the public trust in
wildlife. Susan Morath Horner. 35 Land & Water L Rev 23-75
(2000).
Environmental entrepreneurs: keys to achieving wilderness
conservation goals. John A. Baden. 76 DU L Rev 519-534 (1999).
Examination of court opinions on the enforcement and defense of
conservation easements and other conservation and preservation
tools: themes and approaches to date. Jessica E. Jay, Melissa K.
Thompson. 78 U Denv L Rev 373-412 (2001).
Federal consistency requirements of the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972: it's time to repeal this fundamentally flawed
legislation. Bruce Kuhse. 6 Ocean & Coastal L J 77-108 (2001).
Fragmentation of public domain law and policy: an alternative to
the "shift-to-retention" thesis. Sally K. Fairfax, Leigh
Raymond. 39 Nat Resources J 649-753 (1999).
Groundwater conservation: conundrums and solutions for the new
millenium. Itzchak E. Kornfeld. 15 Tulane Envtl L J 365-381
(2002).
House taxwriters - treasury discuss land conservation tax
incentives. Patti Mohr, Warren Rojas. 95 Tax Notes 812-814
(2002).
Interest group competition and the Alaska Native Land Claims
Settlement Act. John R. Boyce, Mats A.N. Nilsson. 39 Nat
Resources J 755-798 (1999).
Land conservation and restoration: moving to the landscape level.
David T. Hayes. 21 Va Envtl L J 115-128 (2002).
Last green lagoon: how and why the Bush administration should
save the Colorado River Delta. Peter W. Culp, Robert Jerome
Glennon. 28 Ecology L Q 903(89) (2002).
Mitigation banking as an endangered species conservation tool.
Michael J. Bean, Lynn E. Dwyer. 30 Envtl L Rep 10537-10556
(2000).
Move toward participatory democracy in public land management
under NEPA: Is it being thwarted by the ESA. Lorna Jorgensen. 20
J Land Resources & Envtl L 311-333 (2000).
Moving beyond "jeopardy": water quality standards and the
conservation and recovery of endangered aquatic species. Andrew
C. Hanson. 20 Va Envtl L J 431-482 (2001).
New development in the Law of the Sea: the UNESCO convention on
the protection of underwater cultural heritage. Guido Carducci.
96 Am J Int'l L 419-434 (2002).
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation's San
Pedro report: a case study and analysis of the CEC. Frona M.
Powell. 6 Envtl Law 809-838 (2000).
Partial forfeiture of water rights: Oregon compromises
traditional principles to achieve flexibility. Krista Koehl. 28
Envtl L 1137(1) (1998).
Politics of wilderness preservation and ecological restoration.
Max Oelschlaeger. 42 Nat Resources J 235-246 (2002).
Practice of endangered species conservation on private lands: one
federal biologist's experiences. Edward D. Koch. 38 Idaho L Rev
505-520.
Practitioner's guide to drafting conservation easements and the
tax implications. Adrian Gosch, Maureen Rudolph. 4 Great Plains
Nat Resources J 143-183 (2000).
Provincial regulation of natural resource exploitation (includes
discussion). Martin Kaga. 28 Can-US LJ 357-376 (Annual 2002).
Redwoods, junk bonds, and tools of cosa nostra: a visit to the
dark side of the headwaters controversy. Gideon Kanner. 30 Envtl
L Rep 10756-10770 (2000).
Resource use and sustainability. Thomas E. Graedel, Amit Kapur.
33 Envtl L Rep 29-40 (2003).
Restoration and conservation: the importance of perspective.
Stewart L. Udall. 42 Ariz L Rev 541-547 (2000).
Role of land trusts in biodiversity conservation on private
lands. Nancy A. McLaughlin. 38 Idaho L Rev 453-472 (2002).
Role of mitigation and conservation measures in achieving
compliance with environmental regulatory statutes: lessons from
Section 316 of the Clean Water Act. Thomas J. Schoenbaum,
Richard B. Stewart. 8 NY U Envtl L J 237-331 (2000).
Role of state conservation plans in the listing of endangered and
threatened species. Harriet Hensley. 42 Advoc 8(5) (1999).
Saving the nations's open spaces? A comparative analysis of
recent conservation legislation. Tracy L. Scheidtmann. 7 Envtl
Law 429-450 (2001).
Searching for sustainability. Walter P. Falcon. 27 Ecology L Q
1163 (2001).
Shaping the modern West: the role of the executive branch. John
D. Leshy. 72 U Colo L Rev 287-310 (2001).
Show us the money: managing our nation's estuaries. Jamie E.
Lavergne. 37 Houston L Rev 219-252 (2000).
Tax benefits of conservation easements. C. Timothy Lindstrom. 79
Mich B J 690(7) (June 2000).
Threats to the continued existence of conservation easements.
Jeffrey M. Tapick. 27 Colum J Envtl L 257-296 (2002).
Transition toward sustainability. William C. Clark. 27 Ecology L
Q 1021 (2001).
Tree preservation ordinances: sacrificing private timber rights
on the diminutive altar of public benefit. Brian E. Daughdrill,
Kathryn M. Zickert. 52 Mercer L Rev 705-729 (2001).
Two nations, one river: managing ecosystem conservation in the
Colorado river delta. Michael J. Cohen, Edward P. Glenn, Daniel
F. Luecke, Jennifer Pitt, Carlos Valdes-Casillas. 40 Nat
Resources J 819-864 (2000).
Unique benefits of conservation easements in Colorado. Patricia
Termplar Dow. 31 Colo Law 49(6) (2001).
Water conservation incentives for New Mexico: policy and
legislative alternatives. William M. Fleming, G. Emlen Hall. 40
Nat Resources J 69-91 (2000).
When forever proves fleeting: the condemnation and conversion of
conservation land. Robert H. Levin. 9 NYU Envtl L J 592-637
(2001).
Wildlife law: a coming of age. Eric T. Freyfogle, Dale D. Goble.
33 Entl L Rep 18-28 (2003).
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Basic themes for regulatory takings litigation. J. Peter Byrne.
29 Envtl L 811 (1999).
Constitutional law: inverse condemnation: Supreme Court gives
property owners new rights. Brent L. Slipka. 78 ND L Rev 177-200
(2002).
Endangered Species Act's precarious perch: a constitutional
analysis under the Commerce Clause and the Treaty Power. Omar N.
White. 27 Ecology L Q 215 (2000).
How we got under the sword - the constitutional basis for
environmental laws. Robert Lamar Boese. 46 Landman 35-38
(May/June 2001).
Metrics of constitutional amendments and why proposed
environmental quality amendments don't measure up. J.B. Ruhl. 74
Notre Dame L Rev 245-281 (1999).
On revolution and wetland regulations. Michael J. Gerhardt. 90
Geo L J 2143-2174 (2002).
Regulatory takings: a historical overview and legal analysis for
natural resource management. Susan M. Stedfast. 29 Envtl L 881
(1999).
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers: isolated waters, migratory birds, statutory and
constitutional interpretation. Edward A. Fitzgerald. 43 Nat
Resources J 11-76 (2003).
CONTRACTS
Current developments in production sharing contracts and
international petroleum concerns. Daniel Johnston. 20 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 90-100 (2001).
Emerging "duty of fair dealing" in contract interpretation.
Nathan R. Coleman. 40 Washburn L J 561-592 (2001).
CONVEYANCES
Common problems in the interpretation of deeds and conveyances.
Timothy C. Dowd. 48 Landman 67-75 (Mar/Apr 2003).
Conveyancing and collateralizing Utah water rights. R.L. Knuth.
12 Utah B J 12(17) (Dec 1999).
Proper reporting of income earned between effective date and
closing date of purchase agreement. Vance C. Bryson. 21
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 110-119 (2002).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, III. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-72 (1999).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith III. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
67-105 (2000).
CORPORATIONS
Conducting a successful internal environmental investigation.
Jay G. Martin. 6 Envtl Law 673-761 (2000), reprinted in 38 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Managing the risk of sanctions in the global oil & gas industry:
corporate response under political, legal and commercial
pressures. Thomas W. Walde. 36 Tex Int'l L J 183-229 (2001).
Multinational corporations and compliance with international
regulations relating to the petroleum industry. Emeka Duruigbo.
7 Ann Surv Int'l & Comp L 101-146 (2001).
Shelf corporations and the code: much ado about almost nothing.
Robert E. Blatz, Jr.. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 1-45 (2001).
World-wide comparisons of corporate income taxes. Jack R. Fay.
49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 683-703 (2001).
CRIMINAL LAW
Crime in the oilpatch. Susan R. Richardson. 19 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 52-70 (2000).
DENMARK
Emerging oil and gas law in the Faroe Islands. Anita Ronne. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 184-192 (No. 8, 2002).
DEREGULATION
New electric powerhouses: will they transform your life.
G. Kelly. 29 Envtl L 285 (Summer 1999).
Suedeen
DEVELOPMENT
Co-evolution of sustainable development and environmental
justice: cooperation, then competition, then conflict. J.B.
Ruhl. 9 Duke Envtl L & Pol'y Forum 161-185 (1999).
Kazakhstan's amended legal regime for natural resource
development: the key changes. Yuri G. Basin, Olga I. Chentsova,
Jonathan H. Hines. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 52-65 (February
2000).
Lake Tahoe's temporary development moratorium: why a stitch in
time should not define the property interest in a takings claim.
Tedra Fox. 28 Ecology L Q 399 (2001).
Law of public participation in global energy and resources
development: a new IBA book. Alastair R Lucas, George (Rock)
Pring, Donald N Zillman. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 79-83
(2002).
Transfer of development rights as an option for land preservation
in a historic New Mexico community: La Cienega Valley, Santa Fe
County, New Mexico. C. Ageton, W. Fleming, A. Jandacek, J.
Marmon, R. Messenger, S. Moeller, D. Myers-Taylor, J. Rivera, M.
Santelli, L. Vitela. 41 Nat Resources J 427-443 (2001).
What does the Grand Staircase - Escalante mean for land
protection in the West? Resource development and ecological
protection. Gary C. Bryner. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L
567-580 (2001).
DISCLOSURE
Relevance versus reliability of oil and gas reserve quantity and
value disclosures: the results of two decades of research.
Horace R. Brock, Charlotte J. Wright. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 86-110 (1999).
Valuation analysis of environmental disclosures in the oil and
gas industry. Gary M. Fleischman, Paul D. Hutchison. 51 Oil Gas
& Energy Q 61-80 (2002).
DISCOVERY
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Ernest E. Smith.
DORMANT MINERAL INTERESTS
Comparative review of oil and gas law in Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, New Mexico, Mississippi & Louisiana. Tom Daily,
Timothy Dowd, John McDavid, Gregory Nibert, Richard Revels,
George Snell. 47 Landman 33-120 (Nov/Dec 2002).
Dormant minerals and reunification of estates. William P.
Pearce. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 3-1(41) (2005).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, III. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-72 (1999).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith III. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
67-105 (2000).
DRAINAGE
Did the Eleventh Circuit crack "frac?" Hydraulic fracturing after
the court's landmark LEAF decision (Legal Environmental
Assistance Foundation). Markus G. Puder. 18 Va Envtl L J 507-554
(1999).
Drainage issues in the Atlantic Canada offshore petroleum
industry. Robert G. Grant, Richard A. Neufeld. 24 Dalhousie L J
127-150 (2002).
Prospecting for oil at the court house: recovery for drainage
caused by secondary recovery operations. Ana Boswell Stephens.
50 Ala L Rev 603-622 (1999).
USGS abandoned mine lands initiative: Colorado and Montana pilot
projects. Rebekah King. 31 Colo Law 87-90 (Nov 2002).
DRILLING
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: in the debate over drilling in
the refuge's coastal plain, the environment is the only true
loser. Sheila Weigert. 8 Envtl Law 169-187 (2001).
Background history of directional drilling in Michigan.
Christine A. Klein. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L 173-176
(2002).
Basics of directional drilling. Harold Fitch. 2002 L Rev Mich St
Univ-Detroit C L 177-185 (2002).
Benefits of and legal authority for directional drilling under
the Great Lakes. Daniel L. Pulter. 2002 L Rev Mich St
Univ-Detroit C L 193-206 (2002).
Directional drilling from the Great Lakes shoreline: not worth
the risk. Tanya Cabala. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L
207-212 (2002).
Directional drilling: a flawed policy places resources at risk.
James Clift. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L 187-192 (2002).
Drilling for oil underneath the Arctic's coastal plain: proposal
for another Prudhoe Bay environmental disaster. Eleanor A. Hunt.
8 Envtl Law 189-213 (2001).
Drilling through the muddied waters on the Outer Continental
Shelf: an examination of the Fifth Circuit's recent decision in
Demette v. Falcon Drilling Co.. E. Stewart Spielman. 26 Tulane
Mar L J 683-694 (2002).
Economics of mixed blessings. William Bornstein. 8 Envtl Law
239-263 (2001).
Frozen assets? Alaskan oil's threat to national energy security.
L. Hunter Lovins, Amory Lovins. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
135-139 (No. 7, 2001).
Hey, that's my dirt! Subsurface trespass in horizontally drilled
wells. Joy Stevens. 45 Landman 47-65 (May/June 2000), reprinted
in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Information is Alaska's greatest untapped resource. Samantha K.
Sherman. 8 Envtl Law 215-238 (2001).
Now is the time to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Linda Nichols. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 463-468 (2003).
Oil and gas title searches and notice under the Surface
Development Notification Act. Richard H. Bate. 31 Colo Law
113-119 (Oct 2002).
DUE DILIGENCE
Colorado supreme court addresses reasonable diligence in the
continuation of a conditional water right. Darrell Brown. 3 Denv
U Water L Rev 98-104 (1999).
Due process and public participation in tribal environmental
programs. John P. Lowndes, Dean B. Suagee. 13 Tulane Envtl L J
1-43 (1999).
Negotiating title defects. Linda Ensley. 44 Landman 26-27
(Sept/Oct 1999).
Offshore gumbo: NTLs, FPSOs, OMM, MMS-2005, OSFR, DWWR, SOOs,
SOPs, etc. - current offshore regulatory and due diligence issues
for the land professional. Jonathan A. Hunter. 46 Landman 47-58
(May/June 2001).
Unclaimed property. Cynthia D. Hardin. 44 Landman 23-25
(Sept/Oct 1999).
ECOLOGY
Missouri River and adaptive management: protecting ecological
function and legal process. John H. Davidson, Thomas Earl Geu.
80 Neb L Rev 816-890 (2001).
ECONOMICS
Economic exchange as the requisite basis for royalty ownership of
value added in natural-gas sales. John Bratland. 41 Nat
Resources J 685-711 (2001).
Economic sanctions and their effect on the energy industry. Lori
A. Feathers. 36 Tex Int'l L J 175-181 (2001).
Energy and economic sanctions. . 36 Tex Int'l L J 18-27 (2001).
New water for the Colorado River: economic and environmental
considerations for replacing the bypass flow. Chris W. Fitzer,
Lisa Force, Jennifer Pitt. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 68-86 (2002).
Performance indicators for natural resource and environmental
policy: contributions from American institutional law and
economics. Michael D. Kaplowitz, Nicholas Mercuro. 11 Duke Envtl
L & Pol'y Forum 139 (2000).
ECUADOR
International standards in Ecuador's Amazon oil fields: the
privatization of environmental law. Judith Kimerling. 26 Colum J
Envtl L 289-397 (2001).
ELECTRICITY
Competition in wholesale electric power markets. James Bohn,
Romkaew Broehm, Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor. 23 Energy L J
281-348 (2002).
Cost responsibility or regulatory indulgence for electricity's
stranded costs. John Burritt McArthur. 47 Am U L Rev 775-934
(1998).
Electric power points - is there a role for the TVA in
post-restructured electric markets. David E. Dismukes, K.E.
Hughes, II. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 433-454 (2002).
Electricity restructuring in the United States and its effects on
the nuclear industry. Milton B. Whitfield. 17 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 309-331 (1999).
New electric powerhouses: will they transform your life. Suedeen
G. Kelly. 29 Envtl L 285 (Summer 1999).
Past and future of electricity regulation. Joseph P. Tomain. 32
Envtl L 435(40) (2002).
Pig in the python: is lumpy capacity investment used and useful.
William J. Baumol, J. Gregory Sidak. 23 Energy L J 383-398
(2002).
State and federal command-and-control regulation of emissions
from fossil-fuel electric power generating plants. Arnold W.
Reitze, Jr.. 32 Envtl L 369(65) (2002).
Used and useful test: implications for a restructured electric
industry. Jonathan A. Lesser. 23 Energy L J 349-381 (2002).
EMINENT DOMAIN
Condemnation without compensation: How environmental eminent
domain diminishes the value of Montana's school trust lands.
Michael J. Mortimer. 8 Dickinson J Envtl L & Pol'y 243-271
(1999).
Environmental takings of private water rights - the case for
water privatization. Walter Block, Roy Whitehead, Jr.. 32 Envtl
L Rep 11162-11176 (2002).
Evicting people from nature: indigenous land rights and national
parks in Australia, Russia, and the United States. David
Ostergren, Robert Poirier. 42 Nat Resources J 331-351 (2002).
Old eminent domain and new scenic easements: land acquisition for
the Ozark National Scenic Riverways. Will Sarvis. 13 W Legal
Hist 1-37 (Winter/Spring 2000).
Protecting "the wastes of the foreshore": the federal
navigational servitude and its origins in state public trust
doctrine. Benjamin Longstreth. 102 Colum L Rev 471-500 (2002).
Underpinnings of the public trust doctrine: lessons from Illinois
Central Railroad. Douglas L. Grant. 33 Ariz St L J 847-885
(2001).
Where to put a pipe - common land use law considerations - or
what is a "lulu" or nimby. Reid C. Wilson. 45 Landman 21-28
(May/June 2000).
EMPLOYMENT LAW
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (No. 2,
2000).
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973
EPA's approach to endangered species protection in state clean
water act programs. Elizabeth Rosen. 30 Envtl L 447 (2000).
Living with the Endangered Species Act in Colorado. Lawrence J.
MacDonnell. 31 Colo Law 61(6) (2002).
Moving beyond "jeopardy": water quality standards and the
conservation and recovery of endangered aquatic species. Andrew
C. Hanson. 20 Va Envtl L J 431-482 (2001).
No success like failure: the Platte River collaborative watershed
planning process. John D. Echeverria. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 559-604 (2001).
Of farmers' takes and fishes' takings: Fifth Amendment
compensation claims when the Endangered Species Act and western
water rights collide. Cori S. Parobek. 27 Harv Envtl L Rev
177-225 (2003), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2003).
Overcoming unintended consequences of endangered species
regulation. Michael J. Bean. 38 Idaho L Rev 409-420 (2002).
Practice of endangered species conservation on private lands: one
federal biologist's experiences. Edward D. Koch. 38 Idaho L Rev
505-520.
Protecting intrastate threatened species: does the Endangered
Species Act encroach on traditional state authority and exceed
the outer limits of the commerce clause. Bradford C. Mank. 36 Ga
L Rev 723-795 (2002).
Quitobaquito desert pupfish, an endangered species within Organ
Pipe Cactus National Monument: Historical significance and
management challenges. Charles W. Conner, Gina Pearson. 40 Nat
Resources J 379-410 (2000).
Rhetoric of delisting species under the Endangered Species Act:
how to declare victory without winning the war. Federico
Cheever. 31 Envtl L Rep 11302-11316 (2001), reprinted in 39 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Salmon and water temperature: taking endangered species seriously
in establishing water quality standards. Craig N. Johnston. 33
Envtl L 151(22) (2003).
Water, population growth, and endangered species in the West.
Holly Doremus. 72 U Colo L Rev 361-414 (2001).
ENERGY LAW
Aesthetics of wind energy systems. Avi Brisman. 13 NYU Envtl L J
1-133 (2005).
Answer is blowing in the wind: why North Dakota should do more to
promote wind energy development. Shane Thin Elk. 6 Great Plains
Nat Resources J 110-120 (2001).
Arbitration in the energy/minerals field: customizing the clause.
Eileen Vernon. 56 Disp Resol J 48(13) (2001).
Bibliography. Rona Carstairs, Mairi Robb. 17 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 387-416 (1999).
Can technology improve financial statement transparency? XBRL for
the energy industry. Zabihollah Rezaee, Jerry L. Turner. 51 Oil
Gas & Energy Q 343-353 (2002).
Climate change levy relating to electricity generated in combined
heat and power stations. Charles Yorke. 2002 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 210-215 (No. 9, 2002).
Demand for energy. William B. Joyce. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q
189-200 (2001).
Economic sanctions and their effect on the energy industry. Lori
A. Feathers. 36 Tex Int'l L J 175-181 (2001).
Electric power points - "A" is for "access charge:" a
definitional tour through today's vocabulary of energy. David E.
Dismukes, K.E. Hughes, II. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 947-973 (2001),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Electric power points - standardizing wholesale markets for
energy. David E. Dismukes, K.E. Hughes, II. 51 Oil Gas & Energy
Q 207-225 (2002).
Emerging energy issues. . 36 Tex Int'l L J 47-56 (2001).
Energy and economic sanctions. . 36 Tex Int'l L J 18-27 (2001).
Energy and the environment: the future of natural gas in America.
Frank Fannon, Sen. James M. Inhofe. 26 Energy L J 349-392
(2005).
Energy and water - a presentation given at the 15th Camden
conference. Matthew R. Simmons. 47 Landman 27-35 (May/June
2002).
Energy policy for the 21st century. David J. Jhirad. 28 Can-US
LJ 315-335 (Annual 2002).
Energy trading in Europe: a post-Barcelona update on the
liberalisation of the E.C. energy markets. Charles Bankes. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 203-209 (No. 9, 2002).
Enterprise database systems in the oil and energy industry.
Raymond Jeffords, Marsha A. Scheidt, Greg M. Thibadoux. 51 Oil
Gas & Energy Q 493-510 (2003).
Environmental implications of the discovery and delivery of new
energy resources in the Canada/U.S. context. James E. Hickey,
Jr.. 28 Can-US LJ 209-218 (Annual 2002).
Environmental implications of the discovery and delivery of new
energy resources in the Canadian context. David Luff. 28 Can-US
LJ 219-235 (Annual 2002).
Environmental rights of indigenous peoples under the Alien Tort
Claims Act, the public trust doctrine and corporate ethics, and
environmental dispute resolution. John Alan Cohan. 20 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 133(53) (2002).
Evidence on the effectiveness of using tax credits to promote
energy conservation. Michael R. Kinney, Kathryn A.S. Lancaster,
Jack Robison. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 339-367 (2001).
Federal financing of green energy: developing green industry in a
changing energy marketplace. John A. Herrick. 31 Pub Contract L
J 257-275 (2002).
Federal project financing incentives for green industries:
renewable energy and beyond. John A. Herrick. 43 Nat Resources J
77-109 (2003).
Forces at work in energy markets. Robert Pritchard. 2002 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 127-131 (No. 6, 2002).
Frozen assets? Alaskan oil's threat to national energy security.
L. Hunter Lovins, Amory Lovins. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
135-139 (No. 7, 2001).
Geothermal energy: is it attractive enough to draw investors for
construction of geothermal electric plants. Kaveh Badlei. 7
Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 109-121 (2001).
Host of tax initiatives await uncertain energy legislation.
Patti Mohr. 91 Tax Notes 1946-1949 (2001).
Impact of changing regulations on audit committees of energy
firms. Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 179-187
(2001).
Law of public participation in global energy and resources
development: a new IBA book. Alastair R Lucas, George (Rock)
Pring, Donald N Zillman. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 79-83
(2002).
Legal principles surrounding the new Canadian and American Arctic
energy debate. Alexander J. Black. 23 Energy L J 81-126 (2002).
Like wilderness, but need oil? Securing America's Future Energy
Act puts little between accident-prone oil companies and the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Samuel Stanke. 32 Envtl L
905(38) (2002).
Minimizing tax liability for energy companies. Richard S. Mark,
Jeffrey J. Tsay. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 35-57 (2000).
National energy policy: assessing energy policy choices. Gary C.
Bryner. 73 U Colo L Rev 341-412 (2002).
New energy policy for the United States. Dinos Stasinopoulos. 20
J Energy & Nat Resources L 50-54 (2002).
New energy regulation: a practical guide to the new EMP regime.
Darren Fox, Edward J. Swan. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
269-274 (No. 12, 2001).
Non-audit fees in the energy sector: a preliminary analysis.
Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 60-66
(2001).
Nuclear power or renewable energy? Available options in today's
energy market. Shubh Nigam. 35 Envtl L Rep 10260-10272 (2005).
Performance-based regulation of utilities. Lawrence Kaufmann,
Mark Newton Lowry. 23 Energy L J 399-457 (2002).
Practical approach to allocating environmental liability and
stabilizing foreign investment in the energy sectors of
developing countries. Michelle Flores. 12 Colo J Int'l Envtl L &
Pol'y 141-163 (2001).
Practical issues in arbitration proceedings. Guy Hardaker. 2000
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 276-281 (No. 11,12 2000).
Precontractual agreements in the energy and natural resources
industries - legal implications and basis for liability (civil,
common law and Islamic law). Mirian Kene Omalu. J Bus L 303-331
(2000).
Press looks at the problem of reconciling the meeting of energy
demands with environmental protection: a Canadian journalist's
perspective. Christopher Waddell. 28 Can US LJ 187-205 (Annual
2002).
Press looks at the problem of reconciling the meeting of energy
demands with environmental protection: an American reporter's
perspective. Emilia Askari. 28 Can-US LJ 183-186 (Annual 2002).
Privatization and the law: comparative analysis and emerging
trends. . 36 Tex Int'l L J 57-74 (2001).
Quandary or quest: Problems of developing coalbed methane as an
energy resource. Kathy Jean Flaherty. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl
L 71-105 (1999-2000), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2000).
Reconciling energy and environmental policy. F. Michael Cleland.
28 Can-US LJ 511-531 (Annual 2002).
Reforming energy markets: a review article. Peter D Cameron. 18
J Energy & Nat Resources L 353-377 (2000).
Regulating offshore wind power and aquaculture: messages from
land and sea. Jeremy Firestone, Willett Kempton, Andrew Krueger,
Christin E. Loper. 14 Cornell J L & Pub Pol'y 71-111 (2004).
Renewable energy permitting on the outer continental shelf: you
call this a process? Present considerations and recommendations
for more precise ocean management. Suzanne C. Breselor. 38
Suffolk U L Rev 193-216 (2005).
Renewable energy sources for development. Richard L. Ottinger,
Rebecca Williams. 32 Envtl L 331(38) (2002).
Role of domestic production in a national energy policy. Juanita
Greenfield, L. Poe Leggette, Nancy L. Pell. 21 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 1-7 (2002).
Solving California's energy crises: the answer may be blowing in
the wind. Beverly J. Shane. 3 McGeorge L Rev 403-413 (2002).
Some determinants of audit report lag in the energy sector.
Thomas E. Wilson, Jr.. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 541-547 (2003).
Sources of funds and risk management for international energy
projects. David Blumenthal. 16 Berkeley J Int'l L 267 (Spring
1998).
State of the energy industry. Gary C. Evans. 46 Landman 33-41
(Nov/Dec 2001).
Statement of principles for a global consensus on sustainable
energy production and consumption. Adrian J Bradbook, Ralph D
Wahnschafft. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 143-163 (2001).
Sustainable energy: a preliminary framework. Lakshman Guruswamy.
38 Ind L Rev 671-688 (2005).
Tapping the power of wind: FERC initiatives to facilitate
transmission of wind power. Darrell Blakeway, Carol Brotman
White. 26 Energy L J 393-422 (2005).
Toward an energy ethic. L. Poe Leggette. 23 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 1-23 (2004), reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J No. 2
(2005).
Transferring risk by contractual indemnity: a view from oil and
energy. Lynn M. Luker, Jeanette H. Quay. 65 Def Couns J 371
(July 1998).
Transnational energy litigation & ADR methods. . 36 Tex Int'l L J
2-10 (2001).
US Energy Policy Act of 2005 and what it means for the US
electric sector. Martin V. Kirkwood, Peter Roberts. 2005 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 261-272 (No. 11, Nov 2005).
US legislative incentives for wind-generated electricity: state
and local statutes. Ernest E. Smith. 23 J Energy & Nat Resources
L 173-187 (2005), reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J No. 2
(2005).
Web resources for the oil, gas and energy industry. Steve
Olshewsky, L. Murphy Smith. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 883-896 (2001).
Wind energy development on BLM lands. Roy Fuller. 24 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 613-639 (2004).
Wind leases in Texas. Lisa Chavarria, Roderick E. Wetsel. 49
Landman 11-24 (Sept/Oct 2004).
Wind power: prospective issues. Lisa Chavarria. 68 Tex BJ 832(8)
(Oct 2005).
ENFORCEMENT
Deregulation and merger enforcement in the natural gas industry.
David Balto, James Mongoven. 69 Antitrust L J 527-568 (2001).
Diminished need for citizen suits to enforce the Clean Water Act.
Patrick S. Cawley. 25 J Legis 181-194 (1999).
Embryo, not fossil: breathing life into the public trust in
wildlife. Susan Morath Horner. 35 Land & Water L Rev 23-75
(2000).
Endangered Species Act enforcement and western water law. Jennie
L. Bricker, David E. Filippi. 30 Envtl L 735 (2000), reprinted in
38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Enforcement of nonpoint source water pollution control and
abatement measures applicable to federal facilities, activities
and land management practices under federal and state law.
Steven J. Hipfel. 8 Envtl Law 75-145 (2001).
Judicial enforcement of forest plans in the wake of Ohio
Forestry. Trent Baker. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 81-107
(2000).
Role of deterrence-based enforcement in a 'reinvented' state/
federal relationship: the divide between theory and reality.
David L. Markell. 24 Harv Envtl L Rev 1-114 (2000).
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (February
2000).
ENGINEERING
Science, engineering, and the perception of environmental
restoration. Victor R. Baker. 42 Ariz L Rev 287-295 (2000).
ENVIRONMENT
Air quality issues in coalbed methane development. Mary A.
Throne. 4 Wyo L Rev 643-666 (2004).
Battle over Endangered Species Act methodology. J.B. Ruhl. 34
Envtl L 555(49) (2004).
Climate change and the National Environmental Policy Act.
Frederick R. Anderson, Geraldine E. Edens. 41 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn
J 265-278 (No. 2, Fall 2004).
Conservation easements: now more than ever - overcoming obstacles
to protect private lands. Adam E. Draper. 34 Envtl L 247(36)
(2004).
Constitutionalizing the environment: the history and future of
Montana's environmental provisions. Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 64
Mont L Rev 157-198 (2003), reprinted in 41 Pub Land & Resources L
Dig (2004).
Controlling water pollution from coalbed methane drilling: an
analysis of discharge permit requirements. Sharon Buccino, Steve
Jones. 4 Wyo L Rev 559-583 (2004).
Corporate nationality, investment protection agreements, and
challenges to domestic natural resources law: the implications of
Glamis Gold's NAFTA chapte 11 claim. Judith Wallace. 17 Geo
Int'l Envtl L Rev 365-392 (2005).
Enduring optimism: examining the rig-to-reef bargain. Rachael E.
Salcido. 32 Ecology L Q 863-937 (2005).
Environmental amenities, private property, and public policy.
Steven J. Eagle. 44 Nat Resources J 425-444 (2004).
Environmental costs and tax policy: the case of future
dismantlement, removal and restoration costs. Carol B. Johnson,
J. Riley Shaw, Charlotte J. Wright. 52 Oil Gas & Energy Q 241-258
(2003).
Environmental disputes with government agencies: Singing in the
reign of ADR. P.B. "Lynn" Walker-Coffey. 33 Colo Law 103-110
(Dec 2004).
Environmental takings of mineral rights: The US and Canadian
experiences. Allan Ingelson. 22 J Energy & Nat Resources L 1-21
(2004).
Flies, spiders, toads, wolves, and the constitutionality of the
Endangered Species Act take provision. Michael C. Blumm, George
Kimbrell. 34 Envtl L 309(54) (2004).
GHG emissions trading, tracking and monitoring. James A.
Holtkamp. 13 Envtl Liab 3-13 (2005).
Glamis Gold Ltd. - a foreign United States citizen? NAFTA and its
potential effect on environmental regulations and the Mining Law
of 1872. Alison A. Ochs. 16 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 495-526
(2005).
Ins and outs of INCs - responding to incidents of noncompliance.
Paul J. Goodwine. 49 Landman 59-68 (Mar/Apr 2004).
Is the Endangered Species Act eco-pragmatic. J.B. Ruhl. 87 Minn
L Rev 885-942 (2003).
Predictions and prescriptions for the Endangered Species Act.
Robert L. Fischman. 34 Envtl L 451(31) (2004).
Recovery of the Colorado River Delta ecosystem: a role for
international law. A. Dan Tarlock. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y
9-16 (Fall 2002).
Regulating versus paying land owners to protect the environment.
John D. Echeverria. 26 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-46 (2006).
Securing ecological investments on other people's land: a
transaction-costs perspective. Christopher S. Elmendorf. 44 Nat
Resources J 529-561 (2004).
So much conflict, yet so much in common: considering the
similarities between western water law and the Endangered Species
Act. Reed D. Benson. 44 Nat Resources J 29-76 (2004).
Take prohibition in section 9 of the Endangered Species Act:
contradictions, ugly ducklings, and conservation of species.
Michael Balster, Federico Cheever. 34 Envtl L 363(34) (2004).
Third party enforcement of conservation easements. Jessica E.
Jay. 29 Vt L Rev 757-797 (2005), reprinted in 43 no. 1 Rocky Mt
Min L Fdn J (2006).
To see the mountains: restoring Colorado's clear and healthy air.
Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 75 U Colo L Rev 433-496 (2004).
Trouble with time: influencing the conservation choices of future
generations. Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 44 Nat Resource J 601-620
(2004).
Viewing land conservation through coase-colored glasses. Terry
L. Anderson. 44 Nat Resources J 361-381 (2004).
What remains of the Endangered Species Act and western water
rights after Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United
States. Brittany K.T. Kauffman. 74 U Colo L Rev 837-883 (2003).
When are environmental amenities policy-relevant. David D.
Haddock. 44 Nat Resources J 383-424 (2004).
When naturally occurring water is a pollutant: Northern Plains
Resource Council v. Fidelity Exploration and Development Co..
Debra A. Owen. 8 Great Plains Nat Resources J 65-75 (2003).
Where the water hits the road: recent developments in Clean Water
Act litigation. James R. May. 33 Envtl L Rep 10369-10378 (2003).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
National Park and Conservation Ass'n v. Stanton: the Niobrara
River's Wild and Scenic river designation environmental impact
statement and general management plan. James Rogers. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 177-194 (2001).
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
1969 Act and environmental protection. Lori Potter. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 70-79 (1999).
Adoption of international environmental standards by
transnational oil companies: reducing the impact of oil
operations in emerging economies. Alexandra S Wawryk. 20 J
Energy & Nat Resources L 402-434 (2002).
Arctic environmental protection strategy, Arctic council and
multilateral environmental initiatives: tinkering while the
Arctic marine environment totters. Stacey Ferrara, Rob Huebert,
David VanderZwaag. 30 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 131(41) (2002).
Asserting a traditional environmental ethic: recent developments
in environmental regulation involving Native American Tribes.
Allison M. Dussias. 33 New Eng L Rev 653-666 (1999).
At the monument to General Meade, or on the difference between
beliefs and benefits. Mark Sagoff. 42 Ariz L Rev 433-462 (2000).
Beneficial use, waste, and forfeiture: the inefficient search for
efficiency in western water use. Janet C. Neuman. 28 Envtl L 919
(1998).
Case study in the intersection of law and science: the 1999
report of the Committee of Scientists. Charles F. Wilkinson. 42
Ariz L Rev 307-318 (2000).
Co-evolution of sustainable development and environmental
justice: cooperation, then competition, then conflict. J.B.
Ruhl. 9 Duke Envtl L & Pol'y Forum 161-185 (1999).
Comment on John Harte's paper, "Land use, biodiversity, and
ecosystem integrity...". Joseph L. Sax. 27 Ecology L Q 1003
(2001).
Conservation options: toward a greater private role. Barton H.
Thompson, Jr.. 21 Va Envtl L J 245-315 (2002).
Cooperative environmental assessments: their increasing role in
oil and gas projects. Judith Hanebury. 24 Dalhousie L J 87-106
(2001).
Crime in the oilpatch. Susan R. Richardson. 19 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 52-70 (2000).
Crisis is the agent of real progress. Brock Evans. 19 Envtl F
48(2) (2002).
Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. J.B.
Ruhl, James Salzman. 53 Stan L Rev 607 (2000).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 140-144 (2002).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 146-147 (1999).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 131-133 (2000).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 115-120 (2000).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 116-119 (2000).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 110-113 (2001).
Current developments in environmental issues. Charlotte Wright.
20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 128-131 (2001).
Current global environment outlook: how is industry doing in
meeting the Rio declaration goals. Helene Genot, Dixie Lee
Laswell, A. Dan Tarlock. 32 John Marshall L Rev 289-317 (1999).
Decommissioning Glen Canyon Dam: the key to Colorado River
ecosystem restoration and recovery of endangered species. Steven
W. Carothers, Dorothy A. House. 42 Ariz L Rev 215-257 (2000).
Defense of cost-benefit analysis for natural resource policy.
Shi-LIng Hsu, John Loomis. 32 Envtl L Rep 10239-10244 (2002).
Drilling for oil underneath the Arctic's coastal plain: proposal
for another Prudhoe Bay environmental disaster. Eleanor A. Hunt.
8 Envtl Law 189-213 (2001).
Due process and public participation in tribal environmental
programs. John P. Lowndes, Dean B. Suagee. 13 Tulane Envtl L J
1-43 (1999).
Endangered Species Act and Indian treaty rights: a fresh look.
Conrad A. Fjetland. 13 Tulane Envtl L J 45-70 (1999).
Enlibra doctrine and preserving the unique rural cultures of the
West. Jeffrey B. Teichert. 13 Utah B J 10(6) (Jan 2000).
Environmental aid in the European electricity market: veni, vidi,
vici. Csaba Markus. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 237-242 (No.
9, 2002).
Environmental and natural resources provisions in state
constitutions. Bret Adams, Alison Garner. 22 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 73-270 (2002).
Environmental contamination: making a claim for property damages.
Gail L. Wurtzler. 18 GP Solo & Small Firm Law 30(4) (2001).
Environmental corner. Ronald Flinn. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q
407-431 (2002).
Environmental corner. Ronald Flinn. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q
721-742 (2001).
Environmental entrepreneurs: keys to achieving wilderness
conservation goals. John A. Baden. 76 DU L Rev 519-534 (1999).
Environmental field - An alternative or supplement for landmen.
Rimmer Covington. 45 Landman 25-29 (Mar/Apr 2000).
Environmental justice and natural areas protection. Michael B.
Gerrard. 18 GP Solo & Small Firm Law 52(2) (2001).
Environmental justice and procedural safeguards: the ethics of
environmental restoration. Kristin Schrader-Frechette, Sean
Walsh. 42 Ariz L Rev 525-540 (2000).
Environmental justice risks in the petroleum industry. Walter
Block, Roy Whitehead, Jr.. 24 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 67-88
(2000).
Environmental perspective on large ecosystem restoration
processes and the role of market, litigation, and regulation.
Daniel F. Luecke. 42 Ariz L Rev 395-432 (2000).
Environmental protection: meeting the challenges of the TwentyFirst Century. Carol Browner. 25 Harv Envtl L Rev 329-336
(2001).
Environmental protest and the law. Stephen Tromans. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 342-348 (No. 12, 1999).
Environmental water account: the California experience. Alf W.
Brandt. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 426-456 (2002).
Evaluating market transactions, litigation, and regulation as
tools for implementing environmental restoration. Bonnie G.
Colby. 42 Ariz L Rev 381-394 (2000).
Evaluation of the usefulness of web-based financial and
environmental performance information provided by oil and gas
companies. Janice Carr, Kathryn A.S. Lancaster, Carolyn A.
Strand. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 591-606 (2002).
Evolution of the public trust doctrine and the degradation of
trust resources: courts, trustees and political power in
Wisconsin. Melissa Kwaterski Scanlan. 27 Ecology L Q 135 (2000).
Failure of EPA's water quality reforms: from environment enhancing competition to uniformity and polluter profits. Roger
E. Meiners, Andrew P. Morriss, Bruce Yandle. 20 UCLA J Envtl L &
Pol'y 25(42) (2002).
Federal environmental restoration initiatives: an analysis of
agency performance and the capacity for change. Robert Jerome
Glennon, John E. Thorson. 42 Ariz L Rev 483-524 (2000).
From old-growth forests to old-growth grasslands: managing
rangelands for structure and function. David E. Brown, Joseph
Feller. 42 Ariz L Rev 319-341 (2000).
Gov't helped cause and must help fix. Sue Ellen Woodridge. 19
Envtl F 53(1) (2002).
Harte panel: questions and answers (habitat and ecosystem
protection). . 27 Ecology L Q 1015 (2001).
History of overfiling under RCRA, the CWA, and the CAA prior to
Harmon, Smithfield, and CLEAN. Jerry Organ. 30 Envtl L Rep
10615-10632 (2000).
History, Indian rights, and natural values. Carl Ullman. 19
Envtl F 51(2) (2002).
How we got under the sword - the constitutional basis for
environmental laws. Robert Lamar Boese. 46 Landman 35-38
(May/June 2001).
Irrationality of economic rationality in the restoration of
natural resources. James L. Nicoll. 42 Ariz L Rev 463-481
(2000).
Just a little bit of R-E-S-P-E-C-T for farmers. Brenda Jahns
Southwick. 19 Envtl F 49(2) (2002).
Justice for the earth in the twenty-first century - restoring the
natural landscape of the American West. Debra L. Donahue. 1 Wyo
L Rev 373-401 (2001).
Keeping clean waters clean: making the Clean Water Act's
antidegradation policy work. John A. Chilson. 32 U Mich J L
Reform 545-571 (1999).
Land use and biodiversity (response to article by John Harte in
this issue. Christopher D. Stone. 27 Ecology L Q 967 (2001).
Land use, biodiversity, and ecosystem integrity: the challenge of
preserving Earth's life support system. John Harte. 27 Ecology L
Q 929 (2001).
Markets for nature. Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl
L & Pol'y Rev 261-315 (2000).
McArthur river uranium mine environmental assessment process.
Helen Cotton. 9 J Envtl L & Prac 71-91 (1999).
Myth of the win-win: misdiagnosis in the business of reassembling
nature. William H. Rodgers, Jr.. 42 Ariz L Rev 297-306 (2000).
National incentives to protect natural resources: preserving
their place in international trade. Paul S. Kibel. 29 Envtl L
Rep 10411-10417 (1999).
National Mining Association v. Army Corps of Engineers. Douglas
E. Morrison. 27 Ecology L Q 649-671 (2000).
National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: the
Clean Water Act is the new battleground in an effort to save
anadromous fish. Scott Johnson. 31 U Tol L Rev 301-322 (2000).
Natural resources and the White Commission report. Carl Tobias.
79 Oregon L Rev 619-646 (2000).
New age of environmental restoration. Joseph L. Sax. 41 Washburn
L J 1-13 (2001).
New agrarianism: land, culture, and the community of life. Eric
T. Freyfogle. 33 Envtl L Rep 10023-10032 (2003).
New water for the Colorado River: economic and environmental
considerations for replacing the bypass flow. Chris W. Fitzer,
Lisa Force, Jennifer Pitt. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 68-86 (2002).
No time is the right time: the Supreme Court's use of ripeness to
block judicial review of forest plans for environmental
plaintiffs. Eacata Desiree Gregory. 75 Chi-Kent L Rev 613-638
(2000).
Perfect storm - how the mining industry was swamped. Robley E.
Berry. 46 Landman 63-66 (July/Aug 2001).
Population segregation to species zoning: the evolution of
reintroduction law under section 10(J) of the Endangered Species
Act. Federico Cheever. 1 Wyo L Rev 287-370 (2001).
Property rights and environmental protection: is this land made
for you and me. Joan C. McGregor. 31 Ariz St L J 391-437 (1999).
Property rights, the market, and environmental change in 20th
century America. Eric T. Freyfogle. 32 Envtl L Rep 10254-10266
(2002).
Public property rights must prevail. Glen Spain. 19 Envtl F
50(2) (2002).
Recent trend for environmental compliance provides new
opportunities for land and water use at brownfields and other
contaminated sites. Robert G. Knowlton, Jeffrie Minier. 41 Nat
Resources J 919-943 (2001).
Regarding the application of the Endangered Species Act to
treaty-reserved rights of the Confederated Tribes of the Columbia
River. Raj Mehta, Nicholas K. Rohner. 26 Am Ind L Rev 287-303
(2002).
Report of the environment and public lands committee. . 22 Energy
L J 415-423 (2001).
Restoration affecting native resources: the place of native
ecological science. Catherine A. O'Neill. 42 Ariz L Rev 343-380
(2000).
Restoration and conservation: the importance of perspective.
Stewart L. Udall. 42 Ariz L Rev 541-547 (2000).
Restoration Rx: an evaluation and prescription. Alyson C.
Flournoy. 42 Ariz L Rev 187-213 (2000).
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow and the Endangered Species Act. Sean
O'Connor. 73 U Colo L Rev 673-746 (2002).
River runs through it: an analysis of the implications of Solid
Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps
of Engineers on the Clean Water Act and fed envtl law. David E.
Kunz. 9 Envtl Law 463-493 (2003).
Role of mitigation and conservation measures in achieving
compliance with environmental regulatory statutes: lessons from
Section 316 of the Clean Water Act. Thomas J. Schoenbaum,
Richard B. Stewart. 8 NY U Envtl L J 237-331 (2000).
Sacred places: Indian rights after the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Dune Lankard. 10 Fordham Envtl L J 371-377 (1999).
Science, engineering, and the perception of environmental
restoration. Victor R. Baker. 42 Ariz L Rev 287-295 (2000).
Searching for Cibola: community-based environmental restoration
in the Colorado River watershed. Peter W. Culp, C. Luther
Propst. 42 Ariz L Rev 259-285 (2000).
Seeing the forest and the trees: the Minnesota timber harvesting
GEIS applied in Potlatch and Boise Cascade. Thaddeus R.
Lightfoot. 29 Wm Mitchell L Rev 437-497 (2002).
Separation of powers, the presidency and the environment. Robert
V. Percival. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 25-66 (2001).
Shaken, not stirred: has Tahoe-Sierra settled or muddied the
regulatory takings waters. Nissa Laughner, Danaya C. Wright. 32
Envtl L Rep 11177-11189 (2002).
Toward comprehensive watershed - based restoration and protection
for Great Salt Lake. Robert W. Adler. 1999 Utah L Rev 99-204
(1999).
Transformation on public lands. Thomas A. Carr, Jan G. Laitos.
26 Ecology L Q 140 (May 1999).
Tulsequah Chief Mine and the fate of the Taku river. Carolyn R.
Herb. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 107-120 (2000).
Unique benefits of conservation easements in Colorado. Patricia
Termplar Dow. 31 Colo Law 49(6) (2001).
Voluntary environmental reporting: does it matter to investors.
Zabihollah Rezaee, Lawrence C. Smith, L. Murphy Smith. 50 Oil Gas
& Energy Q 165-178 (2001).
Watershed democracy: recovering the lost vision of John Wesley
Powell. Donald Worster. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 57-66
(2003).
What lawmakers can learn from large scale ecology. Fred
Bosselman. 17 J Land Use & Envtl L 207-325 (2002).
Who controls the water: incorporating environmental and social
values in water resources planning. James P. Morris. 6 Hastings
W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 117-164 (2000).
Who is taking a "hard look" at the environmental impact of timber
sales. Susan Gedrick Tuozzolo. 10 Vill Envtl L J 547-584 (1999).
Wildlife protection and public welfare doctrine. David P. Gold.
27 Colum J Envtl L 633-668 (2002).
Wrong war, with the wrong enemy, at the wrong time: the coming
battle over the Military Land Withdrawal Act and an experiment in
privatizing the regulation of public lands. Darrin Hostetler. 29
Envtl L 303 (Summer 1999).
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
1999 - the year in review (environmental law issues). Craig N.
Johnston. 30 Envtl L Rep 10173-10192 (2000).
All the President's acts: the APA, NAFTA, and NEPA, which one
should matter when it comes to the environment. Kyle William
Arthur La Londe. 9 Envtl Law 495-519 (2003).
Annual survey of land use literature. Stuart L. Deutsch, A. Dan
Tarlock. 23 Zoning & Plan L Rep 49-63 (2000).
Braving the waters of Supreme Court takings jurisprudence: will
the Fifth Amendment protect western water rights from federal
environmental regulation. Marcus J. Lock. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
76-110 (2000).
Candidate in search of an environmental theme: promote the public
trust. Peter Manus. 19 Stan Envtl L J 315-369 (2000).
Citizen suits against tribal governments and tribal officials
under federal environmental laws. Michael P. O'Connell. 36 Tulsa
L J 335-379 (2000).
Clean and healthful environment and original intent. C.B.
McNeil. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 83-95 (2001).
Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. J.B.
Ruhl, James Salzman. 53 Stan L Rev 607 (2000).
Current global environment outlook: how is industry doing in
meeting the Rio declaration goals. Helene Genot, Dixie Lee
Laswell, A. Dan Tarlock. 32 John Marshall L Rev 289-317 (1999).
Damage control: a field guide to important euphemisms in
environmental law. Oliver A. Houck. 15 Tul Envtl L J 129-132
(2001).
District of Columbia Circuit's new found vigilance over costly
regulations affecting the petroleum refining industry. Stuart
O'Neal. 12 Vill Envtl L J 269-293 (2001).
Earning deference: reflections on the merger of environmental and
land-use law. Michael Allen Wolf. 32 Envtl L Rep 11190-11199
(2002).
Environmental law. Scott D. Deatherage, Jennifer Hodgkins, Becky
Jolin, Matthew Knifton, A. Kay Roska, Elizabeth Webb. 55 SMU L
Rev 979-1033 (2002).
Environmental law. Jennifer Hodgkins. 33 Tex Tech L Rev 845-880
(2002).
Environmental law. Scott D. Deatherage, Scott F. Wendorf. 52 SMU
L Rev 1105-1142 (1999).
Environmental law. Scott D. Deatherage, Matthew J. Knifton,
Scott F. Wendorf. 53 SMU L Rev 965-993 (2000).
Environmental law - Clean Water Act - the Supreme Court scales
back the Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction over "navigable
waters" under the Clean Water Act. Margaret A. Johnston. 24 U
Ark Little Rock L Rev 329-358 (2002).
Environmental law and the general welfare. Oliver A. Houck. 19
Pace Envtl L Rev 675-686 (2002).
Environmental law at the turn of the century: a reportorial
fragment of contemporary history. Joseph L. Sax. 88 Cal L Rev
2375-2402 (2000).
Equitable defenses against the government in the natural
resources and environmental law context. Mary V. Laitos, Amy E.
Mang, Danielle V. Smith. 17 Pace Envtl L Rev 273-323 (2000),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Expanding public trust doctrine: a warning to environmentalists
and policy makers. Geoffrey R. Scott. 10 Fordham Envtl L J 1-70
(1998).
Farms, their environmental harms, and environmental law. J.B.
Ruhl. 27 Ecology L Q 263-349 (2000).
Federal environmental administrative law pathfinder. Scott
Larson. 22 Leg Reference Services Q 19-28 (2003).
Federal environmental law in the "new" federalism era. Robert L.
Glicksman, Stephen R. McAllister. 30 Envtl L Rep 11122-11143
(2000).
Future of environmental "rule of law" litigation: and there is
one. A. Dan Tarlock. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 611-617 (2002).
Greening of America and the graying of United States
environmental law: reflections on environmental law's first three
decades in the United States. Richard J. Lazarus. 20 Va Envtl L
J 75-106 (2001).
How 'total' are 'total maximum daily loads'? Legal issues
regarding the scope of watershed-based pollution control under
the Clean Water Act. Michael M. Wenig. 12 Tulane Envtl L J
87-187 (1998).
Integrating ecosystem services into environmental law: a case
study of wetlands mitigation banking. R. Juge Gregg, J.B. Ruhl.
20 Stan Envtl L J 365-392 (2001).
Kyoto protocol on climate change and the challenges to its
implementation: a commentary. Ved P. Nanda. 10 Colo J Int'l
Envtl L & Pol'y 319-343 (1999).
Litigation process in the development of environmental law.
David Sive. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 727-753 (2002).
Metrics of constitutional amendments and why proposed
environmental quality amendments don't measure up. J.B. Ruhl. 74
Notre Dame L Rev 245-281 (1999).
Miccosukee Indians and environmental law: a confederacy of hope.
William H. Rodgers, Jr.. 31 Envtl L Rep 10918-10927 (Aug 2001).
Mitigation banking as an endangered species conservation tool.
Michael J. Bean, Lynn E. Dwyer. 30 Envtl L Rep 10537-10556
(2000).
Multinational corporations and compliance with international
regulations relating to the petroleum industry. Emeka Duruigbo.
7 Ann Surv Int'l & Comp L 101-146 (2001).
New nonimpairment policy projected for the national park system.
William J. Lockhart. 30 Envtl L Rep 10704-10720 (2000).
On revolution and wetland regulations. Michael J. Gerhardt. 90
Geo L J 2143-2174 (2002).
Past and future of environmental law. James L. Huffman. 30 Envtl
Law 23 (2000).
Ranking the environmental law, natural resources law, and land
use planning journals: a survey of expert opinion. Gregory Scott
Crespi. 23 William & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 273-297 (1998).
Recent developments in land use and environmental law. . 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 207-233 (1999).
Recent developments in land use and environmental law. . 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 323-339 (2000).
Reconstitution of property: property as a web of interests.
Craig Anthony Arnold. 26 Harv Envtl L Rev 281-364 (2002).
Regulatory traffic jams. J.B. Ruhl, James Salzman, Kai-Sheng
Song. 2 Wyo L Rev 253-289 (2002).
School trust lands: the land manager's dilemma between
educational funding and environmental conservation, a Hobson's
choice. Sean E. O'Day. 8 NYU Envtl L J 163-235 (1999).
Superfund program at its 20th anniversary. John Quarles, Michael
W. Steinberg. 31 Envtl L Rep 10706-10711 (2001).
Tragically difficult: the obstacles to governing the commons.
Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 30 Envtl L 241-278 (2000).
Tulk v. Moxhay and Texas environmental law: land use restrictions
under the Texas risk reduction program. Jeffrey M. Gaba. 55 SMU
L Rev 179-195 (2002).
Twenty years of environmental law: role reversals between
Congress and the executive, judicial activism undermining the
environment, and proliferation of environmental/anti groups.
Michael C. Blumm. 20 Va Envtl L J 5-15 (2001).
Un-Locke-ing a "just right" environmental regime: overcoming the
three bears of international environmentalism - sovereignty,
Locke, and compensation. Anne C. Dowling. 26 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 891-959 (2002).
Unfinished stories. Oliver A. Houck. 73 U Colo L Rev 867-942
(2002).
Using property rights to attack environmental protection. Joseph
L. Sax. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 715-726 (2002).
Water, water everywhere, but too few drops to drink: the coming
fresh water crisis and international environmental law. Stephen
C. McCaffrey. 28 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 325 (2000).
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY
Choice of law issue for corporate successor liability under
CERCLA in North Shore Gas Company v. Salomon, Inc.: another
opinion sidesteps the issue. Jay W. Warren. 16 J Nat Resources &
Envtl l 321-331 (2001-02).
Conducting a successful internal environmental investigation.
Jay G. Martin. 6 Envtl Law 673-761 (2000), reprinted in 38 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Dam owner's guide to retirement planning: assessing owner
liability for downstream sediment flow from obsolete dam.
Catherine C. Engberg. 21 Stan Envtl L J 177-222 (2002).
Environmental claims under continuing injury theories in
Colorado. Arthur P. Mizzi. 29 Colo Law 111(3) (July 2000).
Expensing of environmental remediation costs: a primer. Spence
L. Wise. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 319-327 (2002).
Implications of proposed CERCLA reforms for recoveries of natural
resource damages. Suellen Keiner. 28 Envtl L Rep 10089-10096
(1998).
Liability and organizational choice. Richard R.W. Brooks. 45 J L
& Econ 91-125 (2002).
Managing future liability at petroleum impacted sites through
proactive strategic environmental baselining. Gregory S.
Douglas, Scott A. Stout, Allen D. Uhler. 14 Envtl Claims J
201-227 (2002).
Measuring justice for nature: issues in evaluating and litigating
natural resource damages. James Peck. 14 J Land Use & Envtl L
275-306 (1999).
Mythical giant: Clean Water Act section 401 and nonpoint source
pollution. Kristi Johnson. 29 Envtl L 417 (1999).
Practical approach to allocating environmental liability and
stabilizing foreign investment in the energy sectors of
developing countries. Michelle Flores. 12 Colo J Int'l Envtl L &
Pol'y 141-163 (2001).
Recent developments in mountaintop removal mining: West Virginia
rivers are not the coal industry's private dump. Benjamin
Diamond. 6 Envtl Law 891-912 (2000).
Restoring inactive and abandoned mine sites: a guide to managing
environmental liabilities. Jeffrey A. Kodish. 16 J Envtl L &
Litig 381-420 (2001).
State liability for environmental violations: the U.S. Supreme
Court's "new" federalism. Robert L. Glicksman, Stephen R.
McAllister. 29 Envtl L Rep 10665-10681 (1999).
Thorny gift: analysis of EPA's intent to empower Indian tribal
governments with Clean Air Act regulatory authority over nontribal lands and immunize tribal govt's from CAA citizen suits.
O. Wes J. Layton. 7 Envtl Law 225-294 (2001).
Tulsequah Chief Mine and the fate of the Taku river. Carolyn R.
Herb. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 107-120 (2000).
Valuing the environment: courts' struggles with natural resource
damages. Dale B. Thompson. 32 Envtl L 57(33) (2002).
Voluntary environmental reporting: does it matter to investors.
Zabihollah Rezaee, Lawrence C. Smith, L. Murphy Smith. 50 Oil Gas
& Energy Q 165-178 (2001).
ESCHEAT
Unclaimed property.
(Sept/Oct 1999).
Cynthia D. Hardin. 44 Landman 23-25
ESTOPPEL
Equitable defenses against the government in the natural
resources and environmental law context. Mary V. Laitos, Amy E.
Mang, Danielle V. Smith. 17 Pace Envtl L Rev 273-323 (2000),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
ETHICS
Asserting a traditional environmental ethic: recent developments
in environmental regulation involving Native American Tribes.
Allison M. Dussias. 33 New Eng L Rev 653-666 (1999).
Economics and ethics of land reform: A critique of the pontifical
council for justice and peace's "toward a better distribution of
land: The challenge of agrarian reform. Walter Block, Guillermo
Yeatts. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 37-69 (1999-2000).
Environmental justice and procedural safeguards: the ethics of
environmental restoration. Kristin Schrader-Frechette, Sean
Walsh. 42 Ariz L Rev 525-540 (2000).
Ethical dilemmas: a practical look at how we get ourselves into
these messes, and how to get out of them. Deborah L. Goetz. 46
Landman 71-83 (July/Aug 2001).
Why ethics. Owen M. Barnhill. 44 Landman 35-39 (Nov/Dec 1999).
EUROPE
Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations in European
waters: the end of a decade of indecision. John Woodliffe. 14
Int'l J Marine & Coastal L 101-123 (1999).
Energy trading in Europe: a post-Barcelona update on the
liberalisation of the E.C. energy markets. Charles Bankes. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 203-209 (No. 9, 2002).
Environmental aid in the European electricity market: veni, vidi,
vici. Csaba Markus. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 237-242 (No.
9, 2002).
European environmental law goes offshore. Stephen Tromans. 2
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 75-77 (February 2000).
Hydro-diplomacy in south Asia: the conclusion of the Mahakali and
Ganges river treaties. Surya P. Subedi. 93 Am J Int'l L 953-962
(1999).
Impact of EU environmental legislation on the extractive
industry. Thomas Reimer. 29 Int'l Bus Law 51(3) (2001).
Managing the Elbe River Basin: will a renewed era of development
frustrate historical attempts to employ a watershed approach.
Jason S. Wells. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 1-28 (2002).
New developments in E.U. legislation and application of
competition rules to interconnectors. Ricardo Celli, Christian
Riis-Madsen. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 177-183 (No. 8,
2002).
Rights to minerals in Sweden: current situation from an
historical perspective. Eva Liedholm Johnson. 19 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 278-286 (2001).
Ukrainian law on oil and gas exploration and production. Taras
Dumych, Dimitry Serdyuk, B.C. Toms. 2003 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 21-28 (No. 1, 2003).
Why Kosovo? It's the oil. Marjorie Cohn. 56 Nat'l Law Guild Prac
69-73 (1999).
EXPLORATION
Avoiding typical negotiation blunders. Daniel Johnston. 22
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 84-88 (2003).
Morphology and structure of buried impact craters. P. Jan
Cannon. 45 Landman 35-41 (May/June 2000).
EXPROPRIATION
"Just compensation" or just a windfall? do sales of pipeline
servitudes provide valid, reliable comparables for determination
of just compensation in pipeline expropriation. Gregory Anding,
Robert Dille. 45 Loyola L Rev 381-393 (1999).
FEDERAL / STATE RELATIONS
Analyzing conflicts between Indian treaty rights and federal
conservation regulations: are state regulation standards
appropriate. Elizabeth Roat. 84 Marq L Rev 701-721 (2001).
Braving the waters of Supreme Court takings jurisprudence: will
the Fifth Amendment protect western water rights from federal
environmental regulation. Marcus J. Lock. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
76-110 (2000).
Can't get no satisfaction: securing water for federal and tribal
lands in the West. Reed D. Benson. 30 Envtl L Rep 11056-11060
(2000).
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce Kramer. 33 Urb Law 561-661 (2001).
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce M. Kramer. 2000 Inst Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain
1-1(30).
Federal and Pacific Northwest state water laws pertaining to
dairies. Erica N. Hartliep. 37 Idaho L Rev 681-711 (2001).
Federal government as a useful enemy: perspectives on the Bush
energy/environmental agenda from the Texas oilfields. Jacqueline
Lang Weaver. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 1-48 (2001).
Federal government must pay for water to protect species under
the Endangered Species Act. Deborah Curran. 29 Ecology L Q
421(6) (2002).
Federal reserved water rights doctrine under the Wilderness Act:
Is it finally here to stay. Kelly J. Latimer. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 335-356 (2000).
Federal water policy: an idea whose time will (finally) come.
Janet C. Neuman. 20 Va Envtl L J 107-118 (2001).
Federal-state decisionmaking on water: applying lessons learned.
David J. Hayes. 32 Envtl L Rep 11253-11262 (2002).
How did we get here? Looking to history to understand conflicts
in public land governance today. Karin P. Sheldon. 23 Pub Land &
Resources L Rev 1-20 (2002), reprinted in 40 Public Land &
Resources L Dig (2003).
Irrigated desert and imperiled salmon: "reclaiming" illegally
spread water via the Endangered Species Act. Peter M. Lacy. 4
Denv U Water L Rev 351-396 (2001).
Metamorphosis of western water policy: have federal laws and
local decisions eclipsed the states' role. David H. Getches. 20
Stan Envtl L J 3-72 (2001).
NEPA and oil and gas development on federal lands: a primer for
landmen. A. John Davis, Constance Lundberg. 47 Landman 47-61
(Jan/Feb 2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2002).
New national defense water right - an alternative to federal
reserved water rights for military installations. Eric S.
Binkley, Michael J. Cianci, Jr., James F. Williams. 48 Air Force
L Rev 159-184 (2000).
Plan of action: A new alternative to traditional school trust
land exchanges in the West. Holly Chamberlain. 23 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 241-268 (2003).
River runs through it: an analysis of the implications of Solid
Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps
of Engineers on the Clean Water Act and fed envtl law. David E.
Kunz. 9 Envtl Law 463-493 (2003).
Role of deterrence-based enforcement in a 'reinvented' state/
federal relationship: the divide between theory and reality.
David L. Markell. 24 Harv Envtl L Rev 1-114 (2000).
Role of state conservation plans in the listing of endangered and
threatened species. Harriet Hensley. 42 Advoc 8(5) (1999).
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court: Rejecting legislative
favoritism in water right allocations. Sean E. O'Day. 4 Denv U
Water L Rev 29-75 (2000).
Scope of federal authority under the Endangered Species Act:
implications for local land use planning. Jacalyn R. Fleming. 65
Alb L Rev 497(41) (2001).
State and federal command-and-control regulation of emissions
from fossil-fuel electric power generating plants. Arnold W.
Reitze, Jr.. 32 Envtl L 369(65) (2002).
Water law - wilderness areas and federal reserved water rights:
unlimited appropriation of unallocated water endorsed by Idaho
court. R. Clark Miller. 35 Land & Water L Rev 375-394 (2000).
Water rights and Gila River III: the Winters doctrine goes
underground. E. Brendan Shane. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 397-417
(2001).
Water rights for new federal land conservation programs: a turnof-the-century evaluation. John D. Leshy. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
271-289 (2001).
What's in a name...gas gathering or transmission. Rayanne
Griffin Tobey, Maria Mercedes Seidler. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n
Rev 311-326 (No. 11, 1999).
Who needs standing? Using California's unfair competition law to
bring Federal Clean Water Act claims in state court. Shaye
Dively-Coyne. 7 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 127-139 (2001).
FEDERAL ONSHORE OIL AND GAS LEASING REFORM ACT OF 1987
Federal onshore leases and federal exploratory units simplified.
Robin Forte. 48 Landman 51-56 (Mar/Apr 2003), reprinted in 43 No.
1 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Journal (2006).
FEDERALISM
Bragg v. W. Va. Coal Ass'n and the unfortunate limitation of
citizen suits against the state in cooperative federalism
regimes. Margo Hasselman. 29 Ecology L Q 205(25) (2002).
Can the "clear skies initiative" reduce the coordination failure
in new source review and cooperative federalism under the Clean
Air Act. Todd B. Adams. 16 Tulane Envtl L J 127-165 (2002).
Clearing the muddy waters? an examination of SWANCC and the
implications for wetlands protection and the administrative
state. Brandon A. Van Balen. 36 Wake Forest L Rev 845-870
(2001).
Commerce clause pendulum: will federal environmental law survive
in the post-SWANCC epoch of "new federalism". Jamie Y. Tanabe.
31 Envtl L 1051(38) (2001).
Court's use of the implicit divestiture doctrine to implement its
imperfect notion of federalism in Indian country. Alex Tallcheif
Skibine. 36 Tulsa L J 267-304 (2000).
Court, the Clean Water Act, and the Constitution: SWANCC and
beyond. William Funk. 31 Envtl L Rep 10741-10772 (2001).
Economics of environmental regulation by licensing: an assessment
of recent changes to the wetland permitting process. David
Sunding, David Zilberman. 42 Nat Resources J 59-90 (2002).
Federal environmental law in the "new" federalism era. Robert L.
Glicksman, Stephen R. McAllister. 30 Envtl L Rep 11122-11143
(2000).
Federalism and environmental regulation: a public choice
analysis. Richard L. Revesz. 115 Harv L Rev 553-641 (2001).
History of overfiling under RCRA, the CWA, and the CAA prior to
Harmon, Smithfield, and CLEAN. Jerry Organ. 30 Envtl L Rep
10615-10632 (2000).
Lesson for conservation from pollution control law: cooperative
federalism for recovery under the Endangered Species Act. Robert
L. Fischman, Jaelith Hall-Rivera. 27 Colum J Envtl L 45-172
(2002).
Navigating federalism: the missing statutory analysis in Solid
Waste Agency v. Army Corps of Engineers. Robin Kundis Craig. 31
Envtl L Rep 10508-10527 (2001).
Smart growth and sustainable development: threads of a national
land use policy. Patricia E. Salkin. 36 Val U L Rev 381-412
(2002).
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers: isolated waters, migratory birds, statutory and
constitutional interpretation. Edward A. Fitzgerald. 43 Nat
Resources J 11-76 (2003).
State liability for environmental violations: the U.S. Supreme
Court's "new" federalism. Robert L. Glicksman, Stephen R.
McAllister. 29 Envtl L Rep 10665-10681 (1999).
Supreme Court's new federalism: the authority of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers does not extend over isolated intrastate
wetlands under the migratory bird rule. Paul Edward Svensson. 19
Pace Envtl L Rev 165-195 (2001).
TRU cooperative regulatory federalism: radioactive waste
transportation safety in the west. Bernard P. Haggerty. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 41-72 (2002).
Wisconsin v. EPA: tribal empowerment and state powerlessness
under section 518(e) of the Clean Water Act. Paul M. Drucker. 5
Univ of Denver Water L Rev 323-394 (2002).
FINANCING
Avoiding liability for human rights violations in project
finance. Eric Marcks. 22 Energy L J 301-333 (2001).
FINANCING - OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT
Reserve-based financing of oil and gas interests on the outer
continental shelf. O. Foerster Schully III. 47 Landman 41-56
(Sept/Oct 2002).
FINANCING - OIL AND GAS
Analysis of oil and gas stock returns with benchmark ratios.
Hugh Grove, Tommi Johnsen, Ron Rizzuto. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin
Mgmt J 73-85 (1999).
Environmental impacts of international finance corporation
lending and proposals for reform: A case study of conservation
and oil development in the Guatemalan Peten. Ian A. Bowles,
Cyril F. Kormos, James D. Nations, Conrad C.S. Reining, Amy B.
Rosenfeld. 29 Envtl L 103 (Spring 1999).
Forecasting cash flow from operations for oil and gas firms: full
cost versus successful efforts. Kevin T. Berry, David O'Bryan,
Jeffrey J. Quirin. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 745-755 (2003).
Fraudulent financial reporting in the oil and gas industry. Mark
S. Beasley, Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson. 50 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 795-804 (2002).
Oil and gas finance under revised UCC Article 9. Alvin C.
Harrell. 33 Tex Tech L Rev 31-57 (2001).
Reserve-based financing of oil and gas interests on the outer
continental shelf. O. Foerster Schully III. 47 Landman 41-56
(Sept/Oct 2002).
FORCE MAJEURE
Force majeure and take or pay contracts for power stations: the
buyer's perspective. Guy Hardaker. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 163-166 (No. 7, 2000).
FOREIGN LAW - GENERALLY
Litigating problems that arise from natural resources
exploitation in foreign courts: impediments to justice.
Akpan. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 55-78 (2002).
George S
FOREIGN LAW - MINING
Limestone quarrying - extant 1947 - planning permission imposition of conditions - whether environmental impact
assessment required. Andrew Cotterell, Genevieve Kirkwood,
Michael Purdue. J Plan & Env't L 616-622 (July 1999).
FOREST SERVICE
Forest Service, water yield and community stability: defining the
contours of an agency commitment to include land grant
communities in the timber management process. Brett Olsen. 39
Nat Resources J 819-843 (1999).
Ninth Circuit perpetuates the Forest Service's mismanagement of
public range land. Jason Barbeau. 13 Tulane Envtl L J 169-177
(1999).
Prescriptive laws, uncertain science, and political stories:
forest management in the Sierra Nevada. Dave Owen. 29 Ecology L
Q 747-804 (2002).
Taking the "hard look": 9th circuit review of Forest Service
actions under NEPA, NFMA, and NHPA. Loretta V. Chandler. 4 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 204-228 (2000).
United States Forest Service's response to biodiversity science.
Greg D. Corbin. 29 Envtl L 377 (1999).
FORFEITURE
Abandon or not to abandon: what constitutes voluntary abandonment
in the wake of Scott v. McTiernan. Nicole C. Nachtigal. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 247-257 (2001).
FRANCE
Energy market in France - a commencement in two stages part 2:
the gas market, a timid and late start. Anne-Laure
Bernard-Bouissieres, Charles-Henri Calla. 2002 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 132-137 (No. 6, 2002).
French gas market in the age of competition. Boris Martor,
Olivier Ribot. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 79-93 (No. 3,
2000).
Holding mining titles from civil law countries on trust: an
unpredictable and risky exercise. Alexis Blois, Bertrand
Montembault-Heveline. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 131-141
(2000).
Mining industry and environmental regulations in New Caledonia.
Guillaume P Blanc. 5 Australasian J Nat Resources L & Pol'y
225-254 (1998).
Recent changes in the institutional and legal framework for the
mining industry in New Caledonia. Guillaume P. Blanc. 2002 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 146-152 (No. 6, 2002).
Recent developments in gas and electricity law in France.
Charles-Henri Cagniart, Thierry Lauriol. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 75-76 (No. 4, 2001).
FRAUD
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Financial statement fraud: after Enron and Dynergy. Nicholas G.
Apostolou, D. Larry Crumbley. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 371-386
(2002).
Fraudulent financial reporting in the oil and gas industry. Mark
S. Beasley, Joseph V. Carcello, Dana R. Hermanson. 50 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 795-804 (2002).
GAS BALANCING
Gas balancing issues. Mark D. Christiansen. 19 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 30-51 (2000).
GENERAL
Conflicts between surface owners and mineral lessees. Rick D.
Davis, Jr.. 48 Landman 15(27) (Nov/Dec 2003), reprinted in 41 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2004).
Drafting the lease to reduce conflicts over surface rights.
Joseph B.C. Fitzsimons. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 75-94
(2003).
Energy - the big picture. Gavin Longmuir. 49 Landman 41-54
(May/June 2004).
Governing western mineral resources: the emergence of
collaboration. Ric Richardson. 43 Nat Resources J 561-586
(2003).
Monumental legacy of the Antiquities Act of 1906. Mark
Squillace. 37 Ga L Rev 473-610 (2003).
Regulatory takings - recent developments affecting mineral
resources. David R. Little. 48 Landman 35-46 (Sept/Oct 2003),
reprinted in 41 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2004).
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Geological and geophysical costs: a disincentive legacy for the
oil and gas industry. Wray E. Bradley, Patrick A. Hennessee. 49
Oil Gas & Energy Q 767-782 (2001).
GEOLOGY
Landman's contribution in a co2 flood project. Fred E. Schantz.
45 Landman 57-63 (Mar/Apr 2000).
Postle field co2 project phase II - land responsibilities - a
firsthand viewpoint.
2000).
Fred E. Schantz. 45 Landman 57-64 (July/Aug
GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION
Geological and geophysical costs: a disincentive legacy for the
oil and gas industry. Wray E. Bradley, Patrick A. Hennessee. 49
Oil Gas & Energy Q 767-782 (2001).
GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES
Geothermal energy: is it attractive enough to draw investors for
construction of geothermal electric plants. Kaveh Badlei. 7
Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 109-121 (2001).
In hot water: can Idaho's ground water laws adequately govern low
temperature geothermal resources. Laura MacGregor Bettis. 39
Idaho L Rev 113-142 (2002).
Rosette Inc v. United States: Is the United States full of hot
air when it comes to reservation of geothermal resources as a
mineral. Steven R. McNutt. 8 Great Plains Nat Resources J 44-55
(2003).
GERMANY
Implementation of the gas directive in Germany. Gunther Kuhne.
2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 241-244 (No. 10, 2000).
Managing the Elbe River Basin: will a renewed era of development
frustrate historical attempts to employ a watershed approach.
Jason S. Wells. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 1-28 (2002).
Negotiated third party access in Germany: electricity and gas.
Achim R Borner. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 27-39 (2002).
GOLD
From commons to claims: property rights in the California Gold
Rush. Andrea McDowell. 44 Yale J L & Human 1-72 (2002),
reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
GOLD MINING
All that's gold may not glitter. John Dwight Ingram. 18 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 371 (2000).
Constructive conquest in the courts: a legal history of the
Western Shoshone lands struggle - 1861 to 1991. John D.
O'Connell. 42 Nat Resources J 765-799 (2002).
Julietta gold mining project: lessons for project finance in
emerging markets. Ian R. Coles. 24 Fordham Int'l L J 1052-1063
(2001).
GRAZING
Conflict in the forests, in the waters, and on the ranges of the
West. Anita P. Miller. 32 Urban Law 859-875 (2000).
Diamond Bar Cattle Co. v. United States: Holders of state water
rights on federal lands do not also hold property interests to
graze those lands. Mark J. Baas. 4 Great Plains Nat Resources J
296-311 (2000).
Grazing our school endowment lands: Idaho Watersheds Project v.
State Board of Land Commissioners. Laura Scales. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 385-411 (2000).
Is there a middle ground? One approach to resolution of land
disputes in the Northwest. Cory R. Gangle. 64 Mont L Rev 493-517
(2003).
Livestock ranching and traditional culture in northern New
Mexico. Alice McSweeney, Carol Raish. 41 Nat Resources J 713-730
(2001).
Management of grazing: where do we go from here. Chris
Killingsworth, Mark Miller. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L
607-611 (2001).
Pegasus, workhorse, or trojan horse? a case study of the use of
the NEPA process in grazing use decisions on Bureau of Land
Management lands in Wyoming. Alan C. Schroeder, Valentine D.
Sworts. 3 Wyo L Rev 3-104 (2003).
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior:
challenging the evolution of public lands grazing regulations.
Shannon Rigsby. 5 Great Plains Nat Resources J 161-176 (2001).
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt: Tenth Circuit decides that the
Taylor Grazing Act "breathes discretion at every pore". Alisha
Molyneux. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 132-144 (2000).
Ride 'em cowboy: a critical look at BLM's proposed new grazing
regulations. Jospeh M. Feller. 34 Envtl L 1123(20) (2004).
Supreme Court rules against ranchers, upholds grazing regulation
amendments. Ryan Waterman. 28 Ecology L Q 552 (2001).
Uncertainty surrounding grazing and Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act: predicting the outcome. Daryl G. Ward. 13 BYU J Pub L
391-407 (1998).
GROUNDWATER (See also WATER)
Property rights in groundwater - some lessons from the Kansas
experience. John C. Peck. 12 Kan J L & Public Pol'y 493-520
(2003).
GUATEMALA
Environmental impacts of international finance corporation
lending and proposals for reform: A case study of conservation
and oil development in the Guatemalan Peten. Ian A. Bowles,
Cyril F. Kormos, James D. Nations, Conrad C.S. Reining, Amy B.
Rosenfeld. 29 Envtl L 103 (Spring 1999).
GULF OF MEXICO
Access to our backyard reserves: a final resolution of the
western Gulf of Mexico's maritime boundaries. Dabney Welsh. 23
Hous J Int'l L 609 (2001).
HYDROPOWER
Avoiding dam breaching through offsite mitigation: NMFS's 2000
biological opinion on Columbia Basin hydroelectric operations.
Michael C. Blumm, Melissa Powers. 32 Envtl L 241(55) (2002).
Decline of the hydropower czar and the rise of agency pluralism
in hydroelectric licensing. Michael C. Blumm, Viki A. Nadol. 26
Colum J Envtl L 81-130 (2001).
Swanson Mining reconsidered: is Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act constitutional under the Supreme Court's commerce
clause jurisprudence. Jeff L. Massey. 8 Hastings W Nw J Envtl L
& Pol'y 95-107 (2001).
Taking nature into account: observations about the changing role
of analysis and negotiation in hydropower re-licensing. Kurt
Stephenson. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 473-492 (2000).
IMPLIED COVENANTS
Application of the discovery rule to damages arising out of oil
and gas leases. Melanie Martin. 31 St Mary's L J 199-233 (2001).
Implied marketing covenant in oil and gas leases: the producer's
perspective. Scott Lansdown. 31 St. Mary's L J 297-358 (2000),
reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Mutual benefit implied covenant for oil and gas royalty owners.
John Burritt McArthur. 41 Nat Resources J 795-883 (2001).
Natural gas royalties - lessor vs. lessee and the implied
covenant to market. Jeff King. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
17-29 (2000).
Natural gas royalties: lessor vs. lessee and the implied covenant
to market. Jeff King. 63 Tex BJ 854(6) (Oct 2000).
INDEMNIFICATION
Injuries to third parties arising from oil & gas operations: An
analytical framework for examining indemnity and additional
insured issues. Patrick S. Gerald, Holly B. Williams. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 21-35 (1999-2000).
Transferring risk by contractual indemnity: a view from oil and
energy. Lynn M. Luker, Jeanette H. Quay. 65 Def Couns J 371
(July 1998).
INDIA
Implementing the report of the World Commission on Dams: a case
study of the Narmada Valley in India. Shripad Dharmadhikary. 16
Am U Int'l L Rev 1591-1630 (2001).
India's tax act impacts foreign companies operating in natural
resources sector. Ramesh Bangera, Sapan Parekh. 21 Tax Notes
Int'l 2759-2761 (2000).
Iran - Pakistan - India gas pipeline - economy competes with
politics. Anees Jillani, Farhana Khan. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 152-158 (No. 7, 2001).
Legal aspects of oil and gas projects in India. Dimple S. Bath.
18 Austl Mining & Petroleum L J 221-240 (1999).
Liability of companies in Myanmar for the infringements of
foreign contractors. Alec Christie. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 130-132 (No. 5, 2000).
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
INDIAN CULTURE
Asserting a sovereign servitude to protect habitat of imperiled
species. Mary Christina Wood. 25 Vt L Rev 355-448 (2001).
Bear's Lodge or Devil's Tower: intercultural relations, legal
pluralism, and the management of sacred sites on public lands.
Lloyd Burton, David Ruppert. 8 Cornell J L & Pub Pol'y 201-247
(1999).
Can cowboys become Indians? Protecting western communities as
endangered cultural remnants. A. Dan Tarlock. 31 Ariz St L J
539-582 (1999).
Clash of stories at Chimney Rock: a narrative approach to
cultural conflict over Native American sacred sites on public
land. Howard J. Vogel. 41 Santa Clara L Rev 757-806 (2001).
Control of cultural property as human rights law. Sherry Hutt,
C. Timothy McKeown. 31 Ariz St L J 363-389 (1999).
Cultural heritage of American Indian tribes and the preservation
of biological diversity. Dean B. Suagee. 31 Ariz St L J 483-538
(1999).
Cultural tug of wars: an analysis of the legal issues involving
the NPS proposed rule to allow taking of Golden Eagles at Wupatki
National Monument for religious purposes. Brent Gunson. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 399-433 (2002).
Devil's Tower, Rainbow Bridge, and the uphill battle facing
Native American religion on public lands. Charles H. Bonham. 20
L & Ineq: J Theory & Practice 157-202 (2002).
Endangered Species Act and Indian treaty rights: a fresh look.
Conrad A. Fjetland. 13 Tulane Envtl L J 45-70 (1999).
Ensuring the full freedom of religion on public lands: Devils
Tower and the protection of Indian sacred sites. George Linge.
27 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 307-339 (2000).
Evaluation of the effectiveness of cultural resource laws in
criminal prosecution for theft of archeological and cultural
resources from federal lands. Glenna J. Sheveland. 28 New Eng J
on Crim & Civ Confinement 27-60 (2002).
First Amendment's unfulfilled promise in protecting Native
American sacred sites: Is the National Historical Preservation
Act a better alternative. Peter J. Gardner. 47 SD L Rev 68-84
(2002).
Government managed shrines: protection of Native American sacred
site worship. Shawna Lee. 35 Val U L Rev 265-308 (2000).
Intrinsic value and cultural preservation (Response to article by
Sarah Harding in this issue). James W. Nickel. 31 Ariz St L J
355-361 (1999).
Land is itself a sacred, living being: Native American sacred
site protection on federal public lands amidst the shadows of
Bear Lodge. Joel Brady. 24 Am Ind L Rev 153-186 (1999).
Miccosukee Indians and environmental law: a confederacy of hope.
William H. Rodgers, Jr.. 31 Envtl L Rep 10918-10927 (Aug 2001).
Native American consultation in resource development on federal
lands. Connie Rogers. 31 Colo Law 113(6) (2002).
Privileging claims to the past: ancient human remains and
contemporary cultural values. Rebecca Tsosie. 31 Ariz St L J
583-677 (1999).
Property rights and environmental protection: is this land made
for you and me. Joan C. McGregor. 31 Ariz St L J 391-437 (1999).
Protecting the cultural and natural heritage: finding common
ground. Catina Drywater, Lakshman Guruswamy, Jason C. Roberts.
34 Tulsa L J 713-744 (1999).
Protection of cultural resources on public lands: federal
statutes and regulations. Sandra B. Zellmer. 31 Envtl L Rep
10689-10705 (2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2002).
Resource development and human rights: a look at the case of the
Lubicon Cree Indian Nation of Canada. Andrew Huff. 10 Colo J
Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 161-194 (1999).
Sacred places: Indian rights after the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Dune Lankard. 10 Fordham Envtl L J 371-377 (1999).
Sustaining geographies of hope: cultural resources on public
lands. Sandra B. Zellmer. 73 U Colo L Rev 413-519 (2002).
There is hope: a few thoughts on Indian law. Kevin Gover. 24 Am
Ind L Rev 219-228 (1999).
Upper Klamath Lake and the section 106 process: undertakings,
areas of potential effect, and federal responsibility. Kelly
Kritzer. 39 Willamette L Rev 759-778 (2003).
Value, obligation and cultural heritage. Sarah Harding. 31 Ariz
St L J 291-354 (1999).
INDIAN LANDS
A retrospective view of Indian law during the first term of the
Bush-Cheney administration. Thomas L. Sansonetti. Nat Res Dev in
Indian Country 5-1(6) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Accessing Indian lands for mineral development. Colby L. Branch.
Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 3-1(46) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Agency roles in oil and gas development on Indian lands. Stephen
L. Simpson. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 6-1(19) (Rocky Mt Min L
Fdn 2005).
American Indian law - tribal lands - an Indian tribe that holds
title to land by transfer under ANCSA may not impose business tax
when its land is not Indian Country within statutory definition.
Stacy Belisle. 76 U Det Mercy L Rev 903-926 (1999).
Analyzing conflicts between Indian treaty rights and federal
conservation regulations: are state regulation standards
appropriate. Elizabeth Roat. 84 Marq L Rev 701-721 (2001).
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil: Canadian and Gwich' in
Indian legal responses to 1002 area development. Michael T.
Delcomyn. 24 N Ill U L Rev 789-819 (2004).
Arizona Supreme Court designates reservations as permanent
homelands and adopts a balancing approach to quantifying reserved
rights. Debbie Shosteck. 29 Ecology L Q 449(7) (2002).
Balance of power in Indian country - the court, the states, the
tribes: how will jurisdiction be defined. Kevin Gover. Nat Res
Dev in Indian Country 10-1(26) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Basics of successful natural resource development projects in
Indian country. Michael P. O'Connell. Nat Res Dev in Indian
Country 1-1(44) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Can't get no satisfaction: securing water for federal and tribal
lands in the West. Reed D. Benson. 30 Envtl L Rep 11056-11060
(2000).
Canadian aboriginal law update: establishing certainty for mining
and exploration. Thomas Isaac. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country
14-1(42) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Citizen suits against tribal governments and tribal officials
under federal environmental laws. Michael P. O'Connell. 36 Tulsa
L J 335-379 (2000).
Cobell v. Norton update. Lawrence Jensen. Nat Res Dev in Indian
Country 13C-1(2) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Compatibility of the Federal Trust Responsibility with selfdetermination of Indian tribes: reflections on development of the
Federal Trust Responsibility in the twenty-first century. Reid
Peyton Chambers. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 13A-1(43) (Rocky
Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Constructive conquest in the courts: a legal history of the
Western Shoshone lands struggle - 1861 to 1991. John D.
O'Connell. 42 Nat Resources J 765-799 (2002).
Contracting with Indian tribes and resolving disputes: covering
the basics. Neil G. Westesen. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country
11A-1(66) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Court's use of the implicit divestiture doctrine to implement its
imperfect notion of federalism in Indian country. Alex Tallcheif
Skibine. 36 Tulsa L J 267-304 (2000).
Cultural heritage of American Indian tribes and the preservation
of biological diversity. Dean B. Suagee. 31 Ariz St L J 483-538
(1999).
Dark side of efficiency: Johnson v. M'Intosh and the
expropriation of American Indian lands. Eric Kades. 148 U Pa L
Rev 1065-1190 (2000).
Developing the mineral res on the "rez" the new Indian gas
royalty regulations: is it still a matter of trust. James E.
Glaze. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 36-69 (2003).
Developing the mineral res on the "rez" the new Indian gas
royalty regulations: is it still a matter of trust. James E.
Glaze. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 95-131 (2003).
Due process and public participation in tribal environmental
programs. John P. Lowndes, Dean B. Suagee. 13 Tulane Envtl L J
1-43 (1999).
Easements on tribal sovereignty. Todd Miller. 26 Am Ind L Rev
105-131 (2001).
Environmental permitting, tribal "TAS" status under federal
environmental laws and impacts on mineral development. William
C. Scott. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 18-1(38) (Rocky Mt Min L
Fdn 2005).
Federal Indian law. Heather A. Weckbaugh. 76 DU L Rev 845-875
(1999).
Federal Trust Responisbility and tribal - private natural
resource development. Lynn H. Slade. Nat Res Dev in Indian
Country 13B-1(46) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Filling in the blank spots on Powell's and Stegner's maps: the
role of modern Indian tribes in western watersheds. Charles
Wilkinson. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 41-56 (2003).
Future of Devils Lake: is justice delayed justice denied. Emilee
O. Harren. 78 ND L Rev 355-379 (2002).
Give or take an acre: property norms and the Indian Land
Consolidation Act. Katheleen R. Guzman. 85 Iowa L Rev 595-662
(2000).
High level nuclear waste on Indian reservations: pushing the
tribal sovereignty envelope to the edge. Alex Tallchief Skibine.
21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 287-316 (2001).
History and interpretation of the great case of Johnson v.
M'Intosh. Eric Kades. 19 L & Hist Rev 67-116 (2001).
Idaho v. United States: taking a wrong turn in the jurisprudence
of the Equal Footing Doctrine. Steven O. Anderson. 38 Idaho L
Rev 667-705 (2002).
Indian aboriginal and reserved water rights, an opportunity lost.
John B. Carter. 64 Mont L Rev 377-383 (2003).
Indian burial sites unearthed: the misapplication of the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Lucas Ritchie.
26 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 71-96 (2005).
Indian country after ANCSA: divesting tribal sovereignty by
interpretation. Erin Goff Chrisbens. 76 DU L Rev 307-329 (1998).
Indian lands - surface access and use. Colby L. Branch. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 7-1(38) (2005).
Indian natural resource issues in an orderly system. P.S.
Deloria. 41 Nat Resources J 549-559 (2001).
Indian Tribal Energy Development and Self-determination Act of
2005: Opportunities for cooperative ventures. Scot W. Anderson.
Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 8-1(28) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Indian wars: efforts to resolve Western Shoshone land and treaty
issues and to distribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgment
Fund. Thomas E. Luebben, Cathy Nelson. 42 Nat Resources J
801-833 (2002).
Interpreting Indian country in State of Alaska v. Native Village
of Venetie. Kristen A. Carpenter. 35 Tulsa L J 73-161 (1999).
Issues for consideration in negotiating contracts for mineral
development between tribes and non-Indians. Ryan C. Rusche. Nat
Res Dev in Indian Country 11B-1(18) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Labor and employment issues in Indian Country: a non-Indian
business perspective. Walter E. Stern. Nat Res Dev in Indian
Country 15-1(46) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Land is itself a sacred, living being: Native American sacred
site protection on federal public lands amidst the shadows of
Bear Lodge. Joel Brady. 24 Am Ind L Rev 153-186 (1999).
Mary and Carrie Dann v. United States at the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights: victory for Indian land rights and
the environmental. Julie Fishel, Deborah Schaaf. 16 Tulane Envtl
L J 175-187 (2002).
Ninth Circuit errs again: the Quiet Title Act as a bar to
judicial review. John Athens, Jr.. 19 Alaska L Rev 433(28)
(2002).
Non-intercourse Act and statutory restrictions on tribal resource
development and contracting. Thomas H. Shipps. Nat Res Dev in
Indian Country 2-1(20) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Perfecting and enforcing liens and other impediments to lending
in Indian country. Phillip R. Clark, Lynn P. Hendrix. Nat Res
Dev in Indian Country 4-1(47) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Playing reindeer games: Native Alaskans and the federal trust
doctrine. Terese Dillingham. 26 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 649-685
(1999).
Property rights and environmental protection: is this land made
for you and me. Joan C. McGregor. 31 Ariz St L J 391-437 (1999).
Protection of indigenous peoples' rights over land and natural
resources under the Inter-American human rights system. S. James
Anaya, Robert A. Williams, Jr.. 14 Harv Hum Rts J 33-86 (2001).
Race, ethnicity, and natural resources in the United States: a
review. John Schelhas. 42 Nat Resources J 723-763 (2002).
Reaching regional consensus: examining United States Native
American property rights in light of recent international
developments. Kirsten M. Hetzel. 10 Tulane J Int'l & Comp L
307-331 (2002).
Recognizing and preserving native American treaty usufructs in
the Supreme Court: the Mille Lacs case. Michael R. Newhouse. 21
Pub Land & Resources L Rev 169-200 (2000).
Regarding the application of the Endangered Species Act to
treaty-reserved rights of the Confederated Tribes of the Columbia
River. Raj Mehta, Nicholas K. Rohner. 26 Am Ind L Rev 287-303
(2002).
Removing the Eleventh Amendment barrier: defending Indian land
title against state encroachment. Lauren E. Rosenblatt. 78 Tex L
Rev 719-759 (2000).
Retelling allotment: Indian property rights and the myth of
common ownership. Kenneth H. Bobroff. 54 Vand L Rev 1559-1623
(2001).
Revisiting Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe: Robert Nordhaus and
sovereign Indian control over natural resources on reservations.
G. Emlen Hall, Robert J. Nordhaus, Anne Alise Rudio. 43 Nat
Resources J 223-284 (2003).
Rights of way on Native American lands. Mark Murray. 49 Landman
27-30 (Sept/Oct 2004).
Road less traveled - implications of the Goodman Oil decision.
Karen L. Spinola. 38 Idaho L Rev 637-666 (2002).
Sacred sites and cultural resource protection: implications for
mineral development on - and off - Indian lands. Stan N. Harris,
Carla Mattix. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 7-1(44) (Rocky Mt Min
L Fdn 2005).
Simplifying the Indian trust responsibility. Rodina Cave. 32
Ariz St L J 1399-1422 (2000).
Southern Ute: Trial Court to Supreme Court. Jill M. Harrison,
Elizabeth A. McClanahan. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 247-265
(2000-01).
Supreme Court reviews mineral and gas conveyances to surface
patentees and Southern Ute Indian Tribe. Becki J. Lesser. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 125-131 (2000).
Taking Indian land into trust. Mary Jane Sheppard. 44 SD L Rev
681-698 (1999).
Tribal governments and the protection of watersheds and wetlands
in Indian country. James J. Havard, Dean B. Suagee. 13 St.
Thomas L Rev 35-64 (2000).
Tribal reserved water rights: a tale of two basins - litigation
versus negotiation of reserved water compacts and how different
approaches affect min dev and water availability on Indian land.
Richard K. Aldrich. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 17-1(23) (Rocky
Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
Tribal taxation of mineral resource development after Atkinson.
Charles G. Cole. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 12-1(36) (Rocky Mt
Min L Fdn 2005).
United States' indispensability in Indian land claims: the proper
application of Provident Tradesmens. Aaron L. Pawlitz. 45 St.
Louis U L J 1349-1387 (2001).
Ute Indians not entitled to gases under the Coal Lands Acts of
1909 and 1910. Anita Starchman Bryant. 27 Ecology L Q 799-818
(2000).
Water development in Indian Country: current issues involving
Indian country water resources. Scott B. McElroy. Nat Res Dev in
Indian Country 16-1(22) (Rocky Mt Min L Fdn 2005).
When kachinas and coal collide: can cultural resources law rescue
the Hopi at Black Mesa. Katosha Belvin Nakai. 35 Ariz St L J
1283-1330 (2003).
Wind power and other renewable energy projects: the new wave of
power project development on Indian lands. Richard D. Deutsch,
Kevin L. Shaw. Nat Res Dev in Indian Country 9-1(35) (Rocky Mt
Min L Fdn 2005).
INDIAN WATER RIGHTS
Arizona Supreme Court designates reservations as permanent
homelands and adopts a balancing approach to quantifying reserved
rights. Debbie Shosteck. 29 Ecology L Q 449(7) (2002).
Arizona supreme court rejects practicably irrigable acreage
standard for allocating Indian water rights. E. Brendan Shane. 5
Denv U Water L Rev 500-503 (2002).
Bureaucrats and Indians in a contemporary colonial encounter.
Wendy Nelson Espeland. 26 Law & Soc Inquiry.
Can cowboys become Indians? Protecting western communities as
endangered cultural remnants. A. Dan Tarlock. 31 Ariz St L J
539-582 (1999).
Can't get no satisfaction: securing water for federal and tribal
lands in the West. Reed D. Benson. 30 Envtl L Rep 11056-11060
(2000).
Changing legal regimes and the allocation of water between two
California rivers. Ruth Langridge. 42 Nat Resources J 283-330
(2002).
Clear the muddy waters: tribal regulatory authority under section
518 of the Clean Water Act. Regina Cutler. 29 Envtl L 721
(1999).
Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the
federal Indian trust responsibility. Harold Shepherd. 31 Envtl L
901(49) (2001).
Congressman John J. Rhodes and representation: the case of Native
American water rights. Mark A. Weitz. 12 W Legal Hist 77-100
(1999).
Filling in the blank spots on Powell's and Stegner's maps: the
role of modern Indian tribes in western watersheds. Charles
Wilkinson. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 41-56 (2003).
History, Indian rights, and natural values. Carl Ullman. 19
Envtl F 51(2) (2002).
Hopi Tribe and water: preserving the future. Wayne Taylor, Jr..
56 Nat'l Law Guild Prac 37-41 (1999).
Indian reserved water rights in the Missouri River basin. Peter
Capossela. 6 Great Plains Nat Resources J 131-161 (2002).
Indian tribal sovereignty and water resources: Watersheds,
ecosystems and tribal co-management. Edmund J. Goodman. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 185-221 (2000).
Indian water rights, the Missouri river, and the administrative
process: what are the questions. John H. Davidson. 24 Am Ind L
Rev 1-20 (1999).
Inherent tribal sovereignty and the Clean Water Act: the effect
of tribal water quality standards on non-Indian land located both
within and outside reservation boundaries. Andrea K. Leisy. 29
Golden Gate U L Rev 139-180 (1999).
Interstate marketing of Indian water rights: the impact of the
Commerce Clause. Chris Seldin. 87 Cal L Rev 1545 (1999).
Irrigated Eden: tales of the many Snake Rivers. Dale D. Goble.
36 Idaho L Rev 523-528 (2000).
Judicial termination of treaty water rights: the Snake River
case. Michael C. Blumm, Dale D. Goble, Judith V. Royster, Mary
Cristina Wood. 36 Idaho L Rev 449-477 (2000).
Measure of Indian water rights: the Arizona homeland standard,
Gila River adjudication. Barbara A. Cosens. 42 Nat Resources J
835-872 (2002).
Navajo-Gallup project: Legality of intrastate/interbasin
diversions under the Colorado River Compact. John Ruple. 24 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 475-510 (2004).
Protecting tribal waters: the Clean Water Act takes over where
tribal sovereignty leaves off. Robert Erickson. 15 Tulane Envtl
L J 425-442 (2002).
Public lands and waters: who will prevail - man or beast. Anita
P. Miller. 31 Urban Law 883-899 (1999).
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court: Rejecting legislative
favoritism in water right allocations. Sean E. O'Day. 4 Denv U
Water L Rev 29-75 (2000).
Struggle among the states, the federal government, and federally
recognized Indian tribes to establish water quality standards for
waters located on reservations. Kathleen A. Kannler. 15 Geo
Int'l Envtl L Rev 53-77 (2002).
Trust doctrine and the Clean Water Act: the Environmental
Protection Agency's duty to enforce tribal water quality
standards against upstream polluters. Kevin H. Kono. 80 Or L Rev
677-716 (2001).
Winters in the East: tribal reserved rights to water in riparian
states. Judith V. Royster. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev
169-201 (2000).
Wisconsin v. EPA: tribal empowerment and state powerlessness
under section 518(e) of the Clean Water Act. Paul M. Drucker. 5
Univ of Denver Water L Rev 323-394 (2002).
INDONESIA
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
Mining law and policy in Indonesia: issues in current practice
that need reform. Balbir Bhasin, Jennifer McKay. 19 J Energy &
Nat Resources L 329-343 (2001).
Mining law and policy in Indonesia: reforms of the contract of
work model to promote foreign direct investment and
sustainability. Balbir Bhasin, Jennifer McKay. 21 Australian Min
& Petroleum L J 77-94 (2002).
New Indonesian oil and gas law. Mark Newbery. 20 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 355-363 (2002).
Oil and gas law - Indonesian style. Timothy M. Pitt. 2000 Energy
L & Tax'n Rev 228-230 (No. 9, 2000).
INSTREAM FLOW
1969 Act and environmental protection. Lori Potter. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 70-79 (1999).
Choreographing NGO strategies to protect instream flows. Lynne
Marie Paretchan. 42 Nat Resources J 33-57 (2002).
Confluence of a river and a community: An experiment with
community-based watershed management in southwestern Colorado.
Sean T. McAllister. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 287-338 (2000).
Law as catalyst: a new agenda for a traditional water resource
appropriator at Phantom Canyon, Colorado. Annie Epperson, David
M. Freeman. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 39-67 (2002).
INSURANCE
Injuries to third parties arising from oil & gas operations: An
analytical framework for examining indemnity and additional
insured issues. Patrick S. Gerald, Holly B. Williams. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 21-35 (1999-2000).
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Intellectual property - what it is and why it is important to
land professionals. Ted M. Anthony. 47 Landman 41-46 (July/Aug
2002).
INTERNATIONAL
Recipe for a Tex-Mex pipeline project: considerations in
permitting a cross-border gas transportation project. Kenneth S.
Culotta. 39 Tex Int'l L J 287-326 (2004).
Structuring mineral exploration and development joint ventures in
Latin America - an overview. Brooke MacDonald. 17 NYSBA Int'l L
Practicum 72-94 (2004).
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998: can the United States
really protect the world's resources, the need for a binding
international treaty convention on forests. Jennifer A.
Loughrey. 14 Emory Int'l L Rev 315-384 (2000).
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT
Review of the concept of security and mineral tenure: issues and
challenges. Elizabeth Bastida. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L
31-43 (2001).
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Adoption of international environmental standards by
transnational oil companies: reducing the impact of oil
operations in emerging economies. Alexandra S Wawryk. 20 J
Energy & Nat Resources L 402-434 (2002).
Aspects of international petroleum agreements. Don Greenfield,
Bob Rooney. 37 Alta L Rev 352-386 (1999).
Conflict between the establishment and operation of offshore oil
installations, navigation and other uses of the sea in
international law: part I. Hossein Esmaeili. 2002 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 286-290 (No. 11, 2002).
Conflict between the establishment and operation of offshore oil
installations, navigation and other uses of the sea in
international law; Part 2. Hossein Esmaeili. 2002 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 293-300 (No. 12, 2002).
Dams, international rivers, and riparian states: an analysis of
the recommendations of the World Commission on dams. Salman M.A.
Salman. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1477-1505 (2001).
Evolution of an international water resources management regime
in the Mekong river basin. Greg Browder, Leonard Ortolano. 40
Nat Resources J 499-531 (2000).
Evolution of international law on the decommisssioning of oil and
gas installations. Mark Osa Igiehon, Patricia Park. 2001 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 199-212 (No. 9, 2001).
From Schweizerhale to Baia Mare: the continuing failure of
international law to protect Europe's rivers. Aaron Schwabach.
19 Va Envtl L J 431-461 (2000).
Highlights of key revisions - 2002 AIPN model form international
operating agreement. Michael Bolton, Philip Weems. 2003 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 169-184 (No. 6, 2003).
Historical and physical international boundaries in borderlands
water conflicts: a commentary. G. Emlen Hall. 40 Nat Resources J
865-871 (2000).
How well can international water allocation regimes adapt to
global climate change. A. Dan Tarlock. 15 J Land Use & Envtl L
423-449 (2000).
International dispute resolution: drafting mediation, choice of
forum and arbitration clauses. R. Doak Bishop, Mont P. Hoyt.
2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 7-15 (No. 1, 2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
International groundwaters: The upper San Pedro River basin case.
Hector M. Arias. 40 Nat Resources J 199-221 (2000).
International law and the waters of the Euphrates and Tigris.
Yonatan Lupu. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 349 (2001).
International law as an interpretive force in federal Indian law.
. 116 Harv L Rev 1751-1773 (2003).
International river basin management: data and information
exchange under international law and the case of the Mekong River
Basin. Jonathan Chenoweth. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 142-158
(2000).
Internationalization of wildlife and efforts towards its
management: a conceptual framework and the historical record.
Mark Giordano. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 607-627 (2002).
Introduction: World Commission on Dams report, Dams and
Development. Kader Asmal. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1411-1433 (2001).
Legal regime for use and protection of international watercourses
in the Southern African region: evolution and context. Salman
M.A. Salman. 41 Nat Resources J 981-1022 (2001).
Legal response to the world's water crisis: what legacy from the
Hague? What future in Kyoto. Patricia Jones, Salman M.A. Salman,
Patricia Wouters. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 418-425 (2001).
Litigating problems that arise from natural resources
exploitation in foreign courts: impediments to justice. George S
Akpan. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 55-78 (2002).
Mining of internationally shared aquifers: the El Paso - Juarez
case. Octavio E. Chavez. 40 Nat Resources J 237-260 (2000).
Multinational corporations and compliance with international
regulations relating to the petroleum industry. Emeka Duruigbo.
7 Ann Surv Int'l & Comp L 101-146 (2001).
Nile river: potential for conflict and cooperation in the face of
water degradation. Kristin Wiebe. 41 Nat Resources J 731-754
(2001).
Operator's limitation of liability under the 1995 AIPN model form
international operating agreement - have we gone too far. P.
Sean Murphy, Jonathan Sutcliffe. 47 Landman 43-53 (May/June
2002).
Overview of the U.N. Convention on the law of non-navigational
uses of international watercourses. Stephen C. McCaffrey. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 57-73 (2000).
Past and future legal framework of the Nile River Basin.
Christina M. Carroll. 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 269-304 (1999).
Practical guide for drafting international arbitration clauses.
R. Doak Bishop. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 16-40 (No. 1,
2000).
Protection of offshore oil rigs in international law (part I).
Hossein Esmaeili. 18 Austl Mining & Petroleum L J 241-252 (1999).
Safeguarding international river ecosystems in times of scarcity.
A. Dan Tarlock. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 231-272 (2000).
Sources of funds and risk management for international energy
projects. David Blumenthal. 16 Berkeley J Int'l L 267 (Spring
1998).
South Africa's water and dam safety legislation: a commentary and
analysis on the impact of the World Commission on Dam's Report,
Dams and Development. Robyn Stein. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1573-1590
(2001).
Stabilization clauses in international petroleum transactions.
Margarita T.B. Coale. 30 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 217(21) (2002).
Transboundary groundwater on the U.S. - Mexico border: Is the
glass half full, half empty, or even on the table. Helen Ingram.
40 Nat Resources J 185-188 (2000).
Transboundary jurisdiction and watercourse law: China, Kazakhstan
and the Irtysh. Eric W. Sivers. 37 Tex Int'l L J 1-42 (2002).
Un-Locke-ing a "just right" environmental regime: overcoming the
three bears of international environmentalism - sovereignty,
Locke, and compensation. Anne C. Dowling. 26 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 891-959 (2002).
Use of a trilateral network: an activist's perspective on the
formation of the World Commission on Dams. Patrick McCully. 16
Am U Int'l L Rev 1453-1475 (2001).
Water in the U.S. - Mexico border area. Bill Hume. 40 Nat
Resources J 189-197 (2000).
Water, water everywhere, but too few drops to drink: the coming
fresh water crisis and international environmental law. Stephen
C. McCaffrey. 28 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 325 (2000).
What happens next is up to you: human rights at risk in dams and
development. Uprends Baxi. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1507-1529 (2001).
Why is there no international forestry law? an examination of
international forestry regulation, both public and private.
Ronnie D. Lipschutz. 19 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y 153 (Summer 2001).
INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES
Current developments in production sharing contracts and
international petroleum concerns. Daniel Johnston. 18 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 148-167 (1999).
Role of international parks in promoting species retention and
biodiversity. Jarrod H. Becker. 29 Syracuse J Int'l L & Com
371-399 (2002).
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Global trade rules and the world's forests: taking stock of the
World Trade Organization's implications for forests. Nathalie
Chalifour. 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 575-616 (2000).
National incentives to protect natural resources: preserving
their place in international trade. Paul S. Kibel. 29 Envtl L
Rep 10411-10417 (1999).
Role of eco-labels in international trade: can timber
certification be implemented as a means to slowing deforestation.
Teresa Hock. 12 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 347-365 (2001).
INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT
Can state regulation of renewable electricity achieve
discriminatory effects on interstate trade without triggering the
dormant commerce clause. Michael S. Gray. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q
1-27 (2002).
Interstate marketing of Indian water rights: the impact of the
Commerce Clause. Chris Seldin. 87 Cal L Rev 1545 (1999).
Legal and contractual issues relating to interstate gas pipelines
in emerging nations. Blanche Sas. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 70-81 (No. 4, 2002).
Protecting intrastate threatened species: does the Endangered
Species Act encroach on traditional state authority and exceed
the outer limits of the commerce clause. Bradford C. Mank. 36 Ga
L Rev 723-795 (2002).
Swanson Mining reconsidered: is Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act constitutional under the Supreme Court's commerce
clause jurisprudence. Jeff L. Massey. 8 Hastings W Nw J Envtl L
& Pol'y 95-107 (2001).
Transnational energy litigation & ADR methods. . 36 Tex Int'l L J
2-10 (2001).
IRON
Minnesota taconite production tax: an alternative index. Dena
Draskovich, Howard Haas, Peter Kakela. 16 J Nat Resources & Envtl
L 43-58 (2001-02).
IRRIGATION
Arkansas river compact. Dennis M. Montgomery, David W. Robbins.
5 Denv U Water L Rev 58-103 (2001).
Law as catalyst: a new agenda for a traditional water resource
appropriator at Phantom Canyon, Colorado. Annie Epperson, David
M. Freeman. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 39-67 (2002).
Measure of Indian water rights: the Arizona homeland standard,
Gila River adjudication. Barbara A. Cosens. 42 Nat Resources J
835-872 (2002).
Who controls New Mexico's acequias? Acequia government and Wilson
v. Denver. Christopher J. DeLara. 40 Nat Resources J 727-753
(2000).
ITALY
First indications on the implementation in Italy of the gas
directive. Alessandro Bossi, Ivo Formigaro, Paolo Grondona. 2000
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 126-130 (No. 5, 2000).
JOINT EXPLORATION AGREEMENTS
Avoiding typical negotiation blunders. Daniel Johnston. 22
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 84-88 (2003).
JOINT OPERATING AGREEMENTS
Joint operating agreement: purposes and recent decisions
interpreting its provisions. Terry J. Barker. 45 Landman 13-16
(Sept/Oct 2000).
Kansas oil and gas law: defining the duty between participants in
a joint operating agreement. Richard James. 39 Washburn L J
128-142 (1999).
Operator's limitation of liability under the 1995 AIPN model form
international operating agreement - have we gone too far. P.
Sean Murphy, Jonathan Sutcliffe. 47 Landman 43-53 (May/June
2002).
Prudent operator standard: applications beyond the oil and gas
lease. Gary B. Conine. 41 Nat Resources J 23-76 (2001),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
So you're tired of your operator, what are you going to do about
it. Thomas A. Taylor. 46 Landman 21(12) 2001.
Using the web to determine the reasonableness of payments to
royalty owners and non-operators. Christopher K. Alguire,
Jonathan E. Ellis. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 18-35 (2003).
JOINT VENTURES
Cancellation of indebtedness rules for pass - through entities:
new decisions, challenges, and opportunities. Gregory A. Carnes,
Giles Sutton. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 445-458 (2000).
Fiduciary responsibilities to venture partners. Joseph E. Berg,
III, Dennis Keeley, Kerry Shapiro. 44 Landman 47-57 (Sept/Oct
1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Strategic alliances in a global economy: selected factors and
considerations in drafting successful joint venture agreements.
Jay G. Martin. 12 Int'l Q 591-615 (2000).
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Judicial enforcement of forest plans in the wake of Ohio
Forestry. Trent Baker. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 81-107
(2000).
Judicial review and environmental analysis under NEPA: "timing is
everything". Suzanne O. Snowden. 33 Envtl L Rep 10050-10061
(2003), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
Judicial termination of treaty water rights: the Snake River
case. Michael C. Blumm, Dale D. Goble, Judith V. Royster, Mary
Cristina Wood. 36 Idaho L Rev 449-477 (2000).
Ninth Circuit errs again: the Quiet Title Act as a bar to
judicial review. John Athens, Jr.. 19 Alaska L Rev 433(28)
(2002).
No time is the right time: the Supreme Court's use of ripeness to
block judicial review of forest plans for environmental
plaintiffs. Eacata Desiree Gregory. 75 Chi-Kent L Rev 613-638
(2000).
Recent judicial developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers.
Geoffrey D. Baker, Catherine A. Crang. 37 Alta L Rev 439-483
(1999).
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the Oregon trilogy. Charlton H.
Bonham. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 109-143 (2000).
JURISDICTION
Environmental law - Clean Water Act - the Supreme Court scales
back the Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction over "navigable
waters" under the Clean Water Act. Margaret A. Johnston. 24 U
Ark Little Rock L Rev 329-358 (2002).
Idaho nibbles at Montana: carving out a third exception for
tribal jurisdiction over environmental and natural resource
management. H. Scott Althouse. 31 Envtl L 721 (2001).
Local governmental jurisdiction of oil and gas operations - is
there still a home court advantage. Michael J. Wozniak. 48
Landman 49-56 (July/Aug 2003).
LAND EXCHANGES
Continued cartographic chaos or a new paradigm in public land
reconfiguration? The effect of new laws authorizing limited sales
of public land. Nicholas G. Vaskov. 20 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y
79(29) (2002).
Economics and ethics of land reform: A critique of the pontifical
council for justice and peace's "toward a better distribution of
land: The challenge of agrarian reform. Walter Block, Guillermo
Yeatts. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 37-69 (1999-2000).
Federal ownership and management of America's public lands
through land exchanges. Ryan M. Beaudoin. 4 Great Plains Nat
Resources J 229-260 (2000), reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2001).
National forest land exchanges and the growth of Vail and other
gateway communities. John W. Ragsdale, Jr.. 31 Urban Law 1-45
(1999).
LAND STATUS
Conservation easements and the public good: preserving the
environment on private lands. Peter M. Morrisette. 41 Nat
Resources J 373-426 (2001).
Land trust risk management of legal defense and enforcement of
conservation easements: potential solutions. Jessica E. Jay. 6
Envtl Law 441-501 (2000).
Theories of land tenure and the charismatic line in Mason &
Dixon. Robert L. McLaughlin. 24 Okla City U L Rev 799-813
(1999).
LAND USE PLANNING AND REGULATION
2002 land use ADR report. Jonathan Davidson, Susan Trevarthen.
34 Urb Law 919-926 (2002).
2002 ZiPLeRs: the eights annual Zoning and Planning Law Report
land use decision awards. Dwight H. Merriam. 25 Zoning & Plan L
Rep 85-91 (2002).
Analysis of Northwest Forest Plan land use allocations. Michael
C. Soules. 42 Nat Resources J 353-383 (2002).
Annual survey of land use law literature. David Callies, A. Dan
Tarlock. 25 Zoning & Plan L Rep 65-72 (2002).
Annual survey of land use literature. David L. Callies, A. Dan
Tarlock. 24 Zoning & Plan L Rep 81-88 (2001).
Annual survey of land use literature. Stuart L. Deutsch, A. Dan
Tarlock. 22 Zoning & Plan L Rep 49-60 (1999).
Annual survey of land use literature. Stuart L. Deutsch, A. Dan
Tarlock. 23 Zoning & Plan L Rep 49-63 (2000).
Before and after valuation of conservation easements.
Christopher J. Kayser. 27 J Real Estate Tax'n 184-207 (2000).
Changing economic role of natural landscapes in the West: moving
beyond an extractive and tourist perspective. Thomas Michael
Power. 31 Envtl L Rep 10438-10451 (2001).
Comment on John Harte's paper, "Land use, biodiversity, and
ecosystem integrity...". Joseph L. Sax. 27 Ecology L Q 1003
(2001).
Concurrency laws: water as a land-use regulation. Adam Strachan.
21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 435-460 (2001).
Connecting land, water, and growth. Lora A. Lucero, A. Dan
Tarlock. 34 Urb Law 971-979 (2002).
Conservation easements and the public good: preserving the
environment on private lands. Peter M. Morrisette. 41 Nat
Resources J 373-426 (2001).
Conservation easements: important tools to preserve land.
Richard J. Langer, Johanna J. Londeon. 75 Wis Law 10(9) (2002).
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce Kramer. 33 Urb Law 561-661 (2001).
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce M. Kramer. Inst on Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain
1-1(24) (2002).
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce M. Kramer. 2000 Inst Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain
1-1(30).
Custom and public trust: background principles of state property
law. David L. Callies. 30 Envtl L Rep 10003-10023 (2000).
Earning deference: reflections on the merger of environmental and
land-use law. Michael Allen Wolf. 32 Envtl L Rep 11190-11199
(2002).
Enforcement of nonpoint source water pollution control and
abatement measures applicable to federal facilities, activities
and land management practices under federal and state law.
Steven J. Hipfel. 8 Envtl Law 75-145 (2001).
Environmental law, land use, and zoning. Robert A. Lawton. 11
Widener J Pub L 213-224 (2002).
Examination of court opinions on the enforcement and defense of
conservation easements and other conservation and preservation
tools: themes and approaches to date. Jessica E. Jay, Melissa K.
Thompson. 78 U Denv L Rev 373-412 (2001).
From Grand Staircase to Grand Canyon parashant: Is there a
monumental future for the BLM. Bruce Babbitt. 3 Denv U Water L
Rev 223-230 (2000).
From old-growth forests to old-growth grasslands: managing
rangelands for structure and function. David E. Brown, Joseph
Feller. 42 Ariz L Rev 319-341 (2000).
Harte panel: questions and answers (habitat and ecosystem
protection). . 27 Ecology L Q 1015 (2001).
How did we get here? Looking to history to understand conflicts
in public land governance today. Karin P. Sheldon. 23 Pub Land &
Resources L Rev 1-20 (2002), reprinted in 40 Public Land &
Resources L Dig (2003).
Justice for the earth in the twenty-first century - restoring the
natural landscape of the American West. Debra L. Donahue. 1 Wyo
L Rev 373-401 (2001).
Land conservation and restoration: moving to the landscape level.
David T. Hayes. 21 Va Envtl L J 115-128 (2002).
Land trust risk management of legal defense and enforcement of
conservation easements: potential solutions. Jessica E. Jay. 6
Envtl Law 441-501 (2000).
Land use and biodiversity (response to article by John Harte in
this issue. Christopher D. Stone. 27 Ecology L Q 967 (2001).
Land use, biodiversity, and ecosystem integrity: the challenge of
preserving Earth's life support system. John Harte. 27 Ecology L
Q 929 (2001).
Land use, land abuse and land re-use: a framework for the
implementation of TMDLs for nonpoint source polluted waterbodies.
Paula J. Lebowitz. 29 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 97-133 (2002).
Land use, science, and spirituality: the search for a true and
lasting relationship with the land. Charles Wilkinson. 21 Pub
Land & Resources L Rev 1-24 (2000).
Litigating ethics issues in land use: 2000 trends and decisions.
Patricia E. Salkin. 33 Urb Law 687-704 (2001).
National forest land exchanges and the growth of Vail and other
gateway communities. John W. Ragsdale, Jr.. 31 Urban Law 1-45
(1999).
Native American consultation in resource development on federal
lands. Connie Rogers. 31 Colo Law 113(6) (2002).
New AAPL model form master land services contract now available.
Michael E. Curry, Arnold L. Schulberg. 46 Landman 11-17 (July/Aug
2001).
New agrarianism: land, culture, and the community of life. Eric
T. Freyfogle. 33 Envtl L Rep 10023-10032 (2003).
Partial takings claim, ownership rights in land and urban
planning practice: the emerging dichotomy between uncompensated
regulation and compensable benefit extraction under the Fifth.
Edward H. Ziegler. 22 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-18 (2002).
PDRs and TDRs: land preservation tools in a universe of voluntary
and compulsory land use planning tools. Theodore A. Feitshans. 7
Drake J Agric L 305-340 (2002).
Planning milagros: environmental justice and land use regulation.
Craig Anthony Arnold. 76 DU L Rev 1-153 (1998).
Private land made (too) simple. Eric T. Freyfogle. 33 Envtl L
Rep 41-55 (2003).
Promoting agricultural development through land use planning
limits. John C. Becker. 36 Real Prop Prob & Tr J 619-671 (2002).
Property rights and the maintenance of wildlife habitat: the case
for conservation land transactions. Federico Cheever. 38 Idaho L
Rev 431-451 (2002).
Proposal for a Missouri River corridor trust. John E. Thorson.
23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 77-99 (2002).
Ranking the environmental law, natural resources law, and land
use planning journals: a survey of expert opinion. Gregory Scott
Crespi. 23 William & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 273-297 (1998).
Recent developments in land use and environmental law. . 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 207-233 (1999).
Recent developments in land use and environmental law. . 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 323-339 (2000).
Recent trend for environmental compliance provides new
opportunities for land and water use at brownfields and other
contaminated sites. Robert G. Knowlton, Jeffrie Minier. 41 Nat
Resources J 919-943 (2001).
Regionalism in the west: an inventory and assessment. Craig
Fitch, Will Harmon, Matthew McKinney. 23 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 101-191 (2002).
Ripeness doctrine in regulatory takings litigation. Gordon C.
Strachan, Adam Strachan. 22 J Land Resources & Envtl L 19-40
(2002).
Rise of urban archipelagoes in the American West: a new
reservation policy. James R. Rasband. 31 Envtl L 1 (2001).
Scope of federal authority under the Endangered Species Act:
implications for local land use planning. Jacalyn R. Fleming. 65
Alb L Rev 497(41) (2001).
Shift to privatization in land conservation: a cautionary essay.
Sally K. Fairfax, Leigh Raymond. 42 Nat Resources J 599-639
(2002).
Smart growth and sustainable development: threads of a national
land use policy. Patricia E. Salkin. 36 Val U L Rev 381-412
(2002).
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional
Planning Agency: is there a there there. Joel R. Burcat, Julia
M. Glencer. 32 Envtl L Rep 11212-11220 (2002).
Terra firma of terra incognita? Western land use, hazardous
waste, and the devolution of U.S. federal environmental programs.
Kris Wernstedt. 40 Nat Resources J 157-183 (2000).
This year in federalism. Peter A. Buchsbaum. 34 Urb Law 893-899
(2002).
Threats to the continued existence of conservation easements.
Jeffrey M. Tapick. 27 Colum J Envtl L 257-296 (2002).
Three questions for agriculture about the environment. J.B.
Ruhl. 17 J Land Use & Envtl L 395-408 (2002).
Too much or too little - water management and the land use
planning system. Stephen Tromans. J Plan & Env't L 64-78 (Dec
15, 2001).
Tragedy of fragmentation. Eric T. Freyfogle. 32 Envtl L Rep
11321-11332 (2002).
Transfer of development rights as an option for land preservation
in a historic New Mexico community: La Cienega Valley, Santa Fe
County, New Mexico. C. Ageton, W. Fleming, A. Jandacek, J.
Marmon, R. Messenger, S. Moeller, D. Myers-Taylor, J. Rivera, M.
Santelli, L. Vitela. 41 Nat Resources J 427-443 (2001).
Transformation on public lands. Thomas A. Carr, Jan G. Laitos.
26 Ecology L Q 140 (May 1999).
Tree preservation methods: zoning regulation vs. conservation
servitude. R. Scott Wilder. 14 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 253-269
(1998-99).
Tulk v. Moxhay and Texas environmental law: land use restrictions
under the Texas risk reduction program. Jeffrey M. Gaba. 55 SMU
L Rev 179-195 (2002).
Uncertain waters and contested lands: excavating the layers of
Colorado's legal past. Tom I. Romero II. 73 U Colo L Rev 521-585
(2002).
Use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner
groups: Is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax
dollars. R.A. Kluender, J.C. Pickett, T.L. Walkingstick. 39 Nat
Resources J 799-818 (1999).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, III. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-72 (1999).
Using smart growth to achieve sustainable land use policies.
Patricia E. Salkin. 32 Envtl L Rep 11385-11406 (2002).
Water rights for new federal land conservation programs: a turnof-the-century evaluation. John D. Leshy. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
271-289 (2001).
What does the Grand Staircase - Escalante mean for land
protection in the West? Resource development and ecological
protection. Gary C. Bryner. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L
567-580 (2001).
When forever proves fleeting: the condemnation and conversion of
conservation land. Robert H. Levin. 9 NYU Envtl L J 592-637
(2001).
LANDMEN
Get me what I want no matter what I say: the landman's role in
negotiating and closing transactions that preserve the value
perceived by the technical staff. Milam Randolph Pharo. 48
Landman 25-31 (Sept/Oct 2003), reprinted in 41 Pub Land &
Resources L Dig (2004).
LATIN AMERICA
Environmental law in Latin America and the Caribbean: overview
and assessment. Lila Katz De Barrera-Hernandez, Alistair R.
Lucas. 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 207-245 (1999).
Gas-to-energy: structuring downstream projects. John L. Keffer,
Marisa Reuter. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 100-111 (No. 5,
2002).
Review of the concept of security and mineral tenure: issues and
challenges. Elizabeth Bastida. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L
31-43 (2001).
LEASES
Royalty clauses in gas leases: what can lessors deduct now.
Lindsey Warren. 20 Preventive L Rep 23-28 (2002).
LIABILITY
Avoiding liability for human rights violations in project
finance. Eric Marcks. 22 Energy L J 301-333 (2001).
But you said we could do it!: oil companies' liability for the
unintended consequence of MTBE water contamination. Carrie L.
Williamson. 29 Ecology L Q 315(31) (2002).
Closing the book on CERCLA section 107 "joint and several" claims
by liable private parties. Shane Swindle, Karl Tilleman. 18 Va
Envtl L J 159-182 (1999).
Injuries to third parties arising from oil & gas operations: An
analytical framework for examining indemnity and additional
insured issues. Patrick S. Gerald, Holly B. Williams. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 21-35 (1999-2000).
Operator's limitation of liability under the 1995 AIPN model form
international operating agreement - have we gone too far. P.
Sean Murphy, Jonathan Sutcliffe. 47 Landman 43-53 (May/June
2002).
Precontractual agreements in the energy and natural resources
industries - legal implications and basis for liability (civil,
common law and Islamic law). Mirian Kene Omalu. J Bus L 303-331
(2000).
Spreading the liability net: overcoming agricultural exemption
with EPA's proprosed co-permitting regulation under the Clean
Water Act. Rebecca P. Lewandowsi. 27 Vt L Rev 149-175 (2002).
LITIGATION
Arizona supreme court rejects practicably irrigable acreage
standard for allocating Indian water rights. E. Brendan Shane. 5
Denv U Water L Rev 500-503 (2002).
Barriers to successful environmental and natural resources
litigation: Tenth Circuit approaches to standing and agency
discretion. Andrew C. Lillie. 78 U Denv L Rev 193-229 (2000).
Basic themes for regulatory takings litigation. J. Peter Byrne.
29 Envtl L 811 (1999).
Class action litigation comes to the oil patch. Charles W.
Schwartz. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 63-104 (2001), reprinted
in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Common issues and remedies: what do you do when a good thing goes
bad. W. Stephen Rodgers. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 68-90
(2002).
Current issues involving the statute of limitations. Ernest E.
Smith. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 25-46 (2001).
Discussion of McMahon Foundation vs. Amerada Hess - the oil
antitrust litigation. Ronald O. Holman. 45 Landman 43-47
(Sept/Oct 2000).
Environmental perspective on large ecosystem restoration
processes and the role of market, litigation, and regulation.
Daniel F. Luecke. 42 Ariz L Rev 395-432 (2000).
Evaluating market transactions, litigation, and regulation as
tools for implementing environmental restoration. Bonnie G.
Colby. 42 Ariz L Rev 381-394 (2000).
Future of environmental "rule of law" litigation: and there is
one. A. Dan Tarlock. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 611-617 (2002).
Litigating ethics issues in land use: 2000 trends and decisions.
Patricia E. Salkin. 33 Urb Law 687-704 (2001).
Litigating problems that arise from natural resources
exploitation in foreign courts: impediments to justice. George S
Akpan. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 55-78 (2002).
Litigation process in the development of environmental law.
David Sive. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 727-753 (2002).
Litigator's perspective: the Montana TMDL litigation. Jack R.
Tuholske. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 3-17 (2001).
Plaintiff's perspective: class actions in royalty cases. James
L. Reed, Jr.. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 47-62 (2001),
reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Protecting the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness: litigation
and legislation. Richard A. Duncan, Kevin Proescholdt. 76 DU L
Rev 621-658 (1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2000).
Public lands and waters: who will prevail - man or beast. Anita
P. Miller. 31 Urban Law 883-899 (1999).
Public lands litigation in the geography of hope. Sylvia Quasi,
Lois J. Schiffer. 1 Wyo L Rev 413-425 (2001).
Quiet title actions: the Swiss army knife of litigation. Richard
W. Harris. 47 Landman 61-69 (July/Aug 2002).
Resource development and human rights: a look at the case of the
Lubicon Cree Indian Nation of Canada. Andrew Huff. 10 Colo J
Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 161-194 (1999).
Royalty valuation: calculating freight in a marketable-product
jurisdiction. Owen L. Anderson. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
12-43 (2000).
State certification of inchoate water rights on the Upper Lost
River: a prelude to the Klamath adjudication. Peter G. Scott. 13
J Envtl L & Litig 475-508 (1998).
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
1969 Act's contributions to local governmental water suppliers.
Austin C. Hamre, David F. Jankowski, David C. Taussig. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 20-38 (1999).
Counties wresting control: local responses to California's
statewide water market. Caitlin Dyckman, Ellen Hanak. 6 Denv U
Water L Rev 490-518 (2003).
Earning deference: reflections on the merger of environmental and
land-use law. Michael Allen Wolf. 32 Envtl L Rep 11190-11199
(2002).
Here is a land where life is written in water: re-writing western
water law in the 21st century. Jeffrey J. Clayton. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 525-544 (2002).
Local management of natural resources: should local governments
be able to keep oil out. Sierra B. Weaver. 26 Harv Envtl L Rev
231-267 (2002).
Persistence of Powell: the idea of watersheds and participatory
democracy. Donald Snow. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 31-40
(2003).
Potential role of local governments in watershed management. A.
Dan Tarlock. 32 Envtl L Rep 11273-11283 (2002).
Sustaining traditional community values. Louise Liston. 21 (2B)
J Land Resources & Envtl L 585-592 (2001).
MARKET VALUE
U.S. west coast petroleum industry in the 1990s: isolated or
globally integrated. Ronald D. Ripple. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q
105-137 (2001).
Value of reserves-in-the-ground. Daniel Johnston. 21 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 120-132 (2002).
MARKETING
Criteria for the determination of abuse of dominant positions in
network distribution of gas and electricity. Kurt Markert. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 21-24 (No. 2, 2002).
Electric power points - standardizing wholesale markets for
energy. David E. Dismukes, K.E. Hughes, II. 51 Oil Gas & Energy
Q 207-225 (2002).
MARKETING - NATURAL GAS
Natural gas royalties: lessor vs. lessee and the implied covenant
to market. Jeff King. 63 Tex BJ 854(6) (Oct 2000).
State of the energy industry. Gary C. Evans. 46 Landman 33-41
(Nov/Dec 2001).
What accountants need to know about natural gas marketing. Linda
M. Nichols. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 561-565 (2001).
MARKETING - OIL AND GAS
Implied marketing covenant in oil and gas leases: the producer's
perspective. Scott Lansdown. 31 St. Mary's L J 297-358 (2000),
reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Marketing affiliates: differences in royalty valuation analysis
under MMS regulations and state case law. Norma Rosner Iacovo.
20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 35-89 (2001).
Oil & gas market, sector & company relative strength congruity
trading theory (MSCRSCTT): an internet automation approach
applied to Chevron Corporation's stocks. Sara F. Rushinek, Avi
Rushinek. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 671-682 (2000).
This little company went to market: IPAA v. DeWitt and the duty
to market federal oil and gas production at no cost to the
lessor. Sarah L. Inderbitzin. 54 Admin L Rev 1167-1212 (2002).
MARKETING - WATER
Counties wresting control: local responses to California's
statewide water market. Caitlin Dyckman, Ellen Hanak. 6 Denv U
Water L Rev 490-518 (2003).
Emerging markets in water: a comparative institutional analysis
of the Central Valley and Colorado - Big Thompson projects.
Janis M. Carey, David L. Sunding. 41 Nat Resources J 283-328
(2001).
Importance of getting names right: the myth of markets for water.
Joseph W. Dellapenna. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 317-377
(2000).
Interstate marketing of Indian water rights: the impact of the
Commerce Clause. Chris Seldin. 87 Cal L Rev 1545 (1999).
Lessons from the development of western water law for emerging
water markets: common law vs. central planning. Andrew P.
Morriss. 80 Or L Rev 861-946 (2001).
Marketing western water: can a process based geographic
information system improve reallocation decisions. David
Brookshire, Michael Campana, Janie Chermak, Bradley Cullen, Kirk
Gregory, Kate Krause, Olen Paul Matthews, Louis Scuderi, Seth
Snell. 41 Nat Resources J 329-371 (2001).
Markets for nature. Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl
L & Pol'y Rev 261-315 (2000).
Protecting public values in a water market setting: improving
water markets to increase economic efficiency and equity.
Charles W. Howe. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 357-372 (2000).
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Business combinations: recent changes in accounting standards
illustrated through two mergers. C.P. Carter, George E. Nogler.
51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 81-91 (2002).
Competitive effects of mergers and acquisitions of exploration
drilling contractors on the global mineral exploration industry.
Colin Roberts. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 317-328 (2001).
Deregulation and merger enforcement in the natural gas industry.
David Balto, James Mongoven. 69 Antitrust L J 527-568 (2001).
Mergers decrease exploration. Michael T. Halbouty. 47 Landman
33(1) (Sept/Oct 2002).
SFAS 141 and 142: relevance to prior and future mergers and
acquisitions in the oil, gas, and energy industry. Cal
Christian, Mark McCarthy, Douglas K. Schneider. 21 Petroleum Acct
& Fin Mgmt J 53-62 (2002).
METHANE
Coal versus gas: Who gets the mine, and who gets the shaft.
Peter A. Bjork, Steven E. Marlin. 46 Landman 55-69 (March/April
2001).
Coalbed methane primer. Randy Allen. 47 Landman 25-32 (Mar/Apr
2002).
Debunking the natural gas "clean energy" myth: coalbed methane on
Wyoming's Powder River Basin. Amy W. Beatie, Thomas F. Darin. 31
Envtl L Rep 10566-10602 (2001).
Deluge: Potential solutions to emerging conflicts regarding onlease and off-lease surface damage caused by coal bed methane
production. M. Kristeen Hand, Kyle R. Smith. 1 Wyo L Rev 661-693
(2001).
Did the Eleventh Circuit crack "frac?" Hydraulic fracturing after
the court's landmark LEAF decision (Legal Environmental
Assistance Foundation). Markus G. Puder. 18 Va Envtl L J 507-554
(1999).
Final solution to the battle over ownership of coalbed methane
gas. Laura D. Windsor. 17 Ga St U L Rev 893-920 (2001).
Legal considerations in the development of coalbed methane.
Michael J. Laffin. 39 Alta L Rev 127-151 (2001).
Quandary or quest: Problems of developing coalbed methane as an
energy resource. Kathy Jean Flaherty. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl
L 71-105 (1999-2000), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2000).
Solicitor's opinion updating Maynard and McElroy's articles (that
appeared in Volume 2 of this review). John Leshy. 3 Denv U Water
L Rev 94-97 (1999).
Southern Ute: Trial Court to Supreme Court. Jill M. Harrison,
Elizabeth A. McClanahan. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 247-265
(2000-01).
MEXICO
Andrade Mesa wetlands of the all-American canal. Yamilett
Carrillo-Guerrero, Jaqueline Garcia-Hernandez, Kara Gillon,
Edward P. Glenn, Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta, Pamela L. Nagler,
Francisco Zamora-Arroyo, Enrique Zamora-Hernandez. 42 Nat
Resources J 899-914 (2002).
Applied and theoretical aspects of binational watershed councils
(consejos de cuencas) in the U.S. - Mexico borderlands.
Christopher P. Brown, Stephen Mumme. 40 Nat Resources J 895-929
(2000).
Border farmers, water contamination, and the NAAEC environmental
side accord to NAFTA. Margaret Wilder. 40 Nat Resources J
873-894 (2000).
Conservation connections in a fragmented desert environment: the
U.S. - Mexico border. Susan Lieberman Goodwin. 40 Nat Resources
J 989-1016 (2000).
Criminal and civil remedies for transboundary water pollution.
Kristi Fettig. 15 Transnat'l Law 117-154 (2002).
Defining hydrocommons governance along the border of the
Californias: a case study of transbasin diversions and water
quality in the Tijuana - San Diego metropolitan region. Suzanne
M. Michel. 40 Nat Resources J 931-972 (2000).
Focus on a binational watershed with a view toward fostering a
cross-border dialogue. Elaine Moore Hebard. 40 Nat Resources J
281-340 (2000).
Great impact of NAFTA in the energy sector: a Mexican
perspective. Jorge Jimenez. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L
159-194 (2000).
Historical and physical international boundaries in borderlands
water conflicts: a commentary. G. Emlen Hall. 40 Nat Resources J
865-871 (2000).
Implications of sustained drought for transboundary water
management in Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora. Rebecca H.
Carter, Barbara J. Morehouse, Terry W. Sprouse. 40 Nat Resources
J 783-817 (2000).
Legal considerations as to the petrochemical industry in Mexico.
Alejandro Lopez-Velards. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 193-198
(No. 8, 2002).
Legal environmental issue of energy projects in Mexico. Paolo
Solano. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 63-69 (No. 4, 2002).
Lining of the all - American canal: the forgotten voices.
Alfonso Cortez-Lara, Maria Rosa Garcia-Acevedo. 40 Nat Resources
J 261-279 (2000).
Mexico's gas liberalisation not enough: the need for further
reform. Rogelio Lopez-Velarde. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev
239-244 (No. 9/10, 1999).
Mexico: ready for LNG. Rogelio Lopez-Velarde. 2002 Int'l Energy
L & Tax'n Rev 40-45 (No. 3, 2002).
Minute 242 and beyond: Challenges and opportunities for managing
transboundary groundwater on the Mexico - U.S. border. Stephen
P. Mumme. 40 Nat Resources J 341-378 (2000).
New regulation of domestic natural gas supply contracts in
Mexico. Amanda Valdez. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 133-136
(No. 6, 2000).
Prospect for further energy privatization in Mexico. Ewell E.
Murphy, Jr.. 36 Tex Int'l L J 75-97 (2001).
Quitobaquito desert pupfish, an endangered species within Organ
Pipe Cactus National Monument: Historical significance and
management challenges. Charles W. Conner, Gina Pearson. 40 Nat
Resources J 379-410 (2000).
Reconsidering the doctrine of discovery: Spanish land acquisition
in Mexico (1521-1821).. Ali Friedberg. 17 Wis Int'l L J 87-108
(1999).
Two nations, one river: managing ecosystem conservation in the
Colorado river delta. Michael J. Cohen, Edward P. Glenn, Daniel
F. Luecke, Jennifer Pitt, Carlos Valdes-Casillas. 40 Nat
Resources J 819-864 (2000).
U.S. - Mexico borderland water conflicts and institutional
change: a commentary. Vivienne Bennett, Lawrence A. Herzog. 40
Nat Resources J 973-988 (2000).
Water along the border: an introduction to "water issues in the
U.S. - Mexico borderlands. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J
755-758 (2000).
Water use and cultural conflict in 19th century northwestern new
Spain and Mexico. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J 759-781
(2000).
MIDDLE EAST
Caspian Sea legal regime, pipeline diplomacy, and the prospects
for Iran's isolation from the oil and gas frenzy: reconciling
Tehran's legal options with its geopolitical realities. Faraz
Sanei. 34 Vand J Transnat'l L 681 (2001).
Government failure and public indifference: a portrait of water
pollution in Israel. Rachelle Adam. 11 Colo J Int'l Envtl L &
Pol'y 257-376 (2000).
Independent power projects in Iran. David Laurence. 2002 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 255-260 (No. 10, 2002).
Iran - Pakistan - India gas pipeline - economy competes with
politics. Anees Jillani, Farhana Khan. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 152-158 (No. 7, 2001).
Iran as a transportation corridor for Azerbaijan's oil to the
international market. Emmanuel Karagiannis. 2001 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 148-151 (No. 7, 2001).
Iran, Caspian Energy and U.S. sanctions policy after September
11, 2001. Emmanuel Karagiannis. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
245-249 (No. 10, 2002).
Iranian buyback concession: the principle and the prospects.
Jacinta Jackson, Peter Roberts. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
159-161 (No. 7, 2001).
Iranian oil and gas: a legal framework. Rahail Ali. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 295-301 (No. 11, 1999).
Will oil be cut off again? It's less likely now, many experts
say. Kenneth Bredemeier. 47 Landman 23-24 (Sept/Oct 2002).
MINE OPERATIONS
Restoring inactive and abandoned mine sites: a guide to managing
environmental liabilities. Jeffrey A. Kodish. 16 J Envtl L &
Litig 381-420 (2001).
MINERAL DEVELOPMENT
Common issues and remedies: what do you do when a good thing goes
bad. W. Stephen Rodgers. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 68-90
(2002).
Proposal for a Missouri River corridor trust. John E. Thorson.
23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 77-99 (2002).
Rivers and streams: potential impact of proposed water quality
standards on mineral development. Anthony P. Tokarz. 14 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 187-204 (1998-99).
Taxes and nonrenewable resources: the impact on exploration and
development. Jeff Strand. 55 SMU L Rev 1683-1752 (2002).
MINERAL ESTATES
Coal versus gas: Who gets the mine, and who gets the shaft.
Peter A. Bjork, Steven E. Marlin. 46 Landman 55-69 (March/April
2001).
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 44 Landman 41-57
(Nov/Dec 1999).
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 45 Landman 45-64
(Jan/Feb 2000).
Tension beneath the surface: the evolving relationship between
surface and mineral estates. Robert E. Witwer. 30 Colo Law 67(2)
(2001).
MINERAL EXPLORATION
Competitive effects of mergers and acquisitions of exploration
drilling contractors on the global mineral exploration industry.
Colin Roberts. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 317-328 (2001).
Mineral extraction: a question of interpretation. Alexander D.
Winterton. J Plan & Env't L 783-788 (Sept 1999).
Taxes and nonrenewable resources: the impact on exploration and
development. Jeff Strand. 55 SMU L Rev 1683-1752 (2002).
MINERAL INTERESTS
Common problems in the interpretation of deeds and conveyances.
Timothy C. Dowd. 48 Landman 67-75 (Mar/Apr 2003).
Recent developments in surface mining: an examination of Black
Mountain and Bragg v. Robertson. Mickey Webster. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 267-300 (2000-01).
MINERAL LAW
Lawyers, power, and reform: the legal
broad form mineral deed. Dean Hill
(1999).
Oil, gas and mineral law. Richard F.
1219-1269 (2002).
Oil, gas and mineral law. Richard F.
1323-1336 (1999).
campaign to abolish the
Rivkin. 66 Tenn L Rev 467-498
Brown. 55 SMU L Rev
Brown. 52 SMU L Rev
MINERAL LEASES
Little saltwater disposal on the wound: the Louisiana supreme
court's decision in Corbello v. Shell Oil Company. Michael G.
Durand, Gary P. Kraus, Brent G. Sonnier. 48 Landman 55-66
(May/June 2003).
Marking the path post-Cotton: the Supreme Court reaffirms dual
taxation in Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians. Heather G.
Pennington. 14 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 271-287 (1998-99).
MINERAL RIGHTS
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 44 Landman 41-57
(Nov/Dec 1999).
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 45 Landman 45-64
(Jan/Feb 2000).
Do Texas landmen need to obtain a private investigator's license.
Bruce Bigelow. 47 Landman 9-11 (Jan/Feb 2002).
Final solution to the battle over ownership of coalbed methane
gas. Laura D. Windsor. 17 Ga St U L Rev 893-920 (2001).
Lawyers, power, and reform: the legal campaign to abolish the
broad form mineral deed. Dean Hill Rivkin. 66 Tenn L Rev 467-498
(1999).
Oil and gas: top - leasing - unethical claim-jumping or prudent
business practice. Marichiel Lewis. 52 Okla L Rev 127-143
(1999).
Seismic access issues. Christopher B. Manderville, Allan D.
Nielsen. 40 Alta L Rev 1-18 (2002).
Subterranean land law: rights below the surface of land. Jean
Howell. 53 N Ireland Leg Q 268-287 (2002).
Who owns the earth. Margaret Cronin Fisk. 8 Corp Couns 60
(2001).
MINERALS
Current tax policy issues in the optimum development of minerals
resources sector in select countries of Eurasia. Daniel A. Witt.
21 Tax Notes Int'l 1349-1370 (2000).
MINING
Adverse possession of severed mineral interests and the need for
statutory guidance (Texas). Christopher M. Alspach. 37 Tex Tech
L Rev 1073-1130 (2005).
All that's gold may not glitter. John Dwight Ingram. 18 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 371 (2000).
Alternatives in accretion: why there is not yet an appropriate
solution to the application of accretion law to mineral estates.
Daniel K. Brough. 2004 BYU L Rev 169-207 (2004).
Antarctic mining regimes: an appreciation of the attainable.
David W. Floren. 16 J Envtl L & Litig 467-513 (2001).
Between a hard rock and a hard place: politics, midnight
regulations and mining. Andrew Dorchak, Roger E. Meiners, Andrew
P. Morriss. 53 Admin L Rev 551-606 (2003).
Confluence of a river and a community: An experiment with
community-based watershed management in southwestern Colorado.
Sean T. McAllister. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 287-338 (2000).
Contemporary seabed mining regime: a critical analysis of the
mining regulations promulgated by the International Seabed
Authority. Jason C. Nelson. 16 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y
27-75 (2005).
Enlibra doctrine and preserving the unique rural cultures of the
West. Jeffrey B. Teichert. 13 Utah B J 10(6) (Jan 2000).
Ensuring long-term protection of water quality at Colorado mine
sites. Roger Flynn, Jeffrey C. Parsons. 30 Colo Law 83(5)
(2001).
Fiduciary responsibilities to venture partners. Joseph E. Berg,
III, Dennis Keeley, Kerry Shapiro. 44 Landman 47-57 (Sept/Oct
1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
From Corbello to Castex: the mineral lessee's obligation to
restore in Louisiana. Boyd Bryan. 50 Landman 47-54 (Mar/Apr
2005).
Groundwater conservation and coalbed methane development in the
Powder River basin. Samantha Bohrman. 24 L & Ineq: J of Theory &
Prac 181-211 (2006).
Hardrock homesteads: free access and the General Mining Law of
1872. Andrew Dorchak, Roger E. Meiners, Andrew P. Morriss. 24 J
Energy & Nat Resources L 255-280 (2006).
Hardrock mining and the environment: issues of federal
enforcement and liability. John F. Seymour. 31 Ecology L Q
795-956 (2004).
Homesteading rock: a defense of free access under the General
Mining Law of 1872. Andrew Dorchak, Roger E. Meiners, Andrew P.
Morriss. 34 Envtl L 745(63) (2004).
Impact of EU environmental legislation on the extractive
industry. Thomas Reimer. 29 Int'l Bus Law 51(3) (2001).
Legal aspects of creating security interests over mining titles
in the states parties to OHBLA. Thierry M Lauriol. 19 J Energy &
Nat Resources L 201-219 (2001).
Legal framework for analyzing multiple surface use issues. Bruce
M. Kramer. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 2-1(57) (2005).
Mining operations: the receding-face doctrine. Michael J.
Goldberg. 33 Tax Adviser 97(3) (2002).
Multi-faceted approach to the regulation of cyanide in gold
mining operations. Christine R. Thompson. 29 Suffolk Transnat'l
L Rev 79-111 (2005).
National Mining Association v. Army Corps of Engineers. Douglas
E. Morrison. 27 Ecology L Q 649-671 (2000).
New border war: CBM development in the Powder River Basin of
Wyoming and Montana. Eric Waeckerlin. 26 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 149-162 (2005).
Norbeck exception: mining on some public domain lands in the
Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota can be prohibited by
The Department of Agriculture. Jamie C. Thompson, III. 4 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 184-203 (2000).
Regulatory minefield: can the Department of Interior say "no" to
hardrock mine. Christine Knight. 73 U Colo L Rev 619-671 (2002).
Riches of the desert: can the Bureau of Land Management reject a
mining operation based on historic and cultural concerns. Shaye
Dively. 32 Envtl L Rep 10603-10610 (2002).
Right to say no: federal authority over hardrock mining on public
lands. Roger Flynn, Jeffrey C. Parsons. 16 J Envtl L & Litig
249-329 (2001).
Sand wars: mineral reservation policies lead the Supreme Court to
determine whether sand is a valuable mineral in the Nevada
desert. James L. Ryan. 37 Loy U Chi L J 213-278 (2005).
So you want to ban mountaintop mining? You may have to put your
money where your mouth is. Stephanie Rene Timmermeyer. 103 W Va
L Rev 387-404 (2001).
Stuck between a rock and a hard place: the United States Supreme
Court misapplies statutory construction precedent. John
Vaterlaus. 38 Creighton L Rev 1263-1315 (2005).
Water and coal mining in Appalachia: applying the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and the Clean Water Act.
Robert E. Beck. 106 W Va L Rev 629-708 (2004).
West Virginia's seemingly eternal struggle for a fiscally and
environmentally adequate coal mining reclamation bonding program.
Craig B. Giffin. 107 W Va L Rev 105-185 (2004).
Who owns coalbed methane in West Virginia. S. Ryan White. 107 W
Va L Rev 603-624 (2005).
Wilderness Act's impact on mining activities: policy versus
practice. Kenneth D. Hubbard, Marily Nixon, Jeffrey A. Smith. 76
DU L Rev 591-609 (1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L
Dig (2000).
MINING CLAIMS
Mining claims on federal lands. Robert G. Pruitt, Jr.. 46
Landman 13-19 (Nov/Dec 2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land &
Resources L Dig (2002).
MINING LAW
1872 mining law for the new millenium. Sam Kalen. 71 U Colo L
Rev 343-396 (2000).
43 CFR 3809 rulemaking and its relationship to the mining law
debate. Debra W. Struhsacker. 48 Landman 41-45 (May/June 2003).
Brief history of the Nevada law of mining. Earl M. Hill. 7 Nev
Law 12-14 (1999).
Federal legislative and administrative assault on Nevada's mining
industry. Thomas P. Erwin. 7 Nev Law 21(4) (1999).
Introduction to mining law. Richard W. Harris. 7 Nev Law 15-17
(1999).
Mountaintop mining and U.S. EPA's proposed rule change: a giant
step backward for the Clean Water Act. Daniel L. Rosenberg. 30
Envtl L Rep 11175-11180 (2000).
Reconciling natural law and legal positivism in the deep seabed
mining provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Arcangelo Travaglini. 15 Temple Int'l & Comp L J 313-334 (2001).
Sad but significant. Roger Jeppson. 7 Nev Law 18-20 (1999).
MINING LAW - HISTORY
Cleaning up at the tracks: Superfund meets rails-to-trails.
Clifford J. Villa. 25 Harv Envtl L Rev 481-534 (2001).
Crown jewel decision: recognizing the mining law's inherent
limits. Nicole Rinke. 27 Ecology L Q 819-839 (2000).
Perfect storm - how the mining industry was swamped. Robley E.
Berry. 46 Landman 63-66 (July/Aug 2001).
NATIONAL FOREST MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1976
National Forest Management Act: Law of the forest in the year
2000. Susan Anderson, Steven Newman, Angie Oakes, Margaret
Plane, Steven J. Vuyovich, Teresa Welch, Daniel Wendel. 21 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 151-218 (2001).
NATIONAL FORESTS
"Forest must come first": Gifford Pinchot's conservation ethic
and the Gifford Pinchot National Forest - the ideal and the
reality. Susan Jane M. Brown. 11 Fordham Envtl L J 137-205
(1999).
Administrative wilderness: protecting our national forestlands in
contravention of congressional intent and public policy. Brandon
Dalling. 42 Nat Resources J 385-413 (2002).
Analysis of Northwest Forest Plan land use allocations. Michael
C. Soules. 42 Nat Resources J 353-383 (2002).
Carbon sinks and the preservation of old-growth forests under the
Kyoto Protocol. Dayna Nadine Scott. 10 J Envtl L & Prac 105-145
(2001).
Conservation on the cusp: the reformation of national forest
policy in the Sierra Nevada. Lawrence Ruth. 18 UCLA J Envtl L &
Pol'y 1-97 (2000).
Critical evaluation of the development and implementation of
forest preservation strategies. Ryan K. McKain. 15 Conn J Int'l
L 235-259 (2000).
Delegation of law-making authority to the United States Forest
Service: implications in the sruggle for National Forest
management. Michael J. Mortimer. 54 Admin L Rev 907-982 (2002).
Ecological and economic sustainability. Larry E. Craig. 18 Envtl
F 63(2) (May/June 2001).
Equitably treating individual Washington state forest trusts
through consolidated management: a conceptual approach. B. Bruce
Bare, Bruce R. Lippke, Weihuan Xu. 40 Nat Resources J 479-497
(2000).
Failure of watershed analysis under the Northwest Forest Plan: a
case study of the Gifford Pinchot National Forest. Brent Foster.
5 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 337-358 (1999).
Forest land taxation in the new millennium: stewardship
incentivized. David J. Colligan. 78 Denv U L Rev 413-428 (2001).
From old-growth forests to old-growth grasslands: managing
rangelands for structure and function. David E. Brown, Joseph
Feller. 42 Ariz L Rev 319-341 (2000).
Global trade rules and the world's forests: taking stock of the
World Trade Organization's implications for forests. Nathalie
Chalifour. 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 575-616 (2000).
Great experiment that failed? Evaluating the role of a "committee
of scientists" as a tool for managing and protecting our public
lands. Brian Scott Pasko. 32 Envtl L 509(40) (2002).
Is something wrong with the National Forest Management Act.
Robert Breazeale. 21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 317-330
(2001).
Judicial enforcement of forest plans in the wake of Ohio
Forestry. Trent Baker. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 81-107
(2000).
Judicial review of Forest Service decisions made pursuant to the
National Forest Management Act's substantive requirements: time
for a science court. Kristen Potter. 20 J Nat'l Assn Admin L
Judge 241-262 (2000).
Livestock ranching and traditional culture in northern New
Mexico. Alice McSweeney, Carol Raish. 41 Nat Resources J 713-730
(2001).
Local communities and the management of public forests. Michael
McCloskey. 25 Ecology L Q 624 (1998).
Location, location, location: Forest Service Administration of
the recreation residence program. Dan Gildor. 28 Ecology L Q
993(42) (2002).
National forest land exchanges and the growth of Vail and other
gateway communities. John W. Ragsdale, Jr.. 31 Urban Law 1-45
(1999).
National Forest Management Act: Law of the forest in the year
2000. Susan Anderson, Steven Newman, Angie Oakes, Margaret
Plane, Steven J. Vuyovich, Teresa Welch, Daniel Wendel. 21 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 151-218 (2001).
New regs will not insure sustainability. Michael Axline. 18
Envtl F 62(2) (May/June 2001).
No time is the right time: the Supreme Court's use of ripeness to
block judicial review of forest plans for environmental
plaintiffs. Eacata Desiree Gregory. 75 Chi-Kent L Rev 613-638
(2000).
Ohio Forestry and what it means for the future. Barton J. Birch.
37 Idaho L Rev 141-166 (2000).
Redwoods, junk bonds, and tools of cosa nostra: a visit to the
dark side of the headwaters controversy. Gideon Kanner. 30 Envtl
L Rep 10756-10770 (2000).
Regulation of logging on private land in California under
Governor Gray Davis. Kathy Bailey, Thomas N. Lippe. 31 Golden
Gate U L Rev 351-431 (2001).
Roadless area conservation goal: a year of trials for the stalled
regulation. Christine M. Ensley. 8 Envtl Law 639-661 (2002).
Roadless area conservation: how the "roadless rule" affects
America's forestland. Alison S. Hoyt. 14 Tul Envtl L J 525-547
(2001).
Seeing the forest through the eyes of a hawk: an evaluation of
recent efforts to protect northern Goshawk populations in
southwestern forests. James Peck. 40 Nat Resources J 125-156
(2000).
Spirit of '76: Does President Clinton's roadless lands directive
violate the spirit of the National Forest Management Act of 1976.
Jennifer L. Sullivan. 17 Alaska L Rev 127-159 (2000).
Stumbling to Johannesburg: the United States' haphazard progress
toward sustainable forestry law. Robert L. Fischman. 32 Envtl L
Rep 10291-10306 (2002).
Sustainability is mandated by the law. James R. Lyons. 18 Envtl
F 65(2) (May/June 2001).
Tree preservation ordinances: sacrificing private timber rights
on the diminutive altar of public benefit. Brian E. Daughdrill,
Kathryn M. Zickert. 52 Mercer L Rev 705-729 (2001).
Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998: can the United States
really protect the world's resources, the need for a binding
international treaty convention on forests. Jennifer A.
Loughrey. 14 Emory Int'l L Rev 315-384 (2000).
Trust for all the people: rethinking the management of
Washington's state forests. Daniel Jack Chasan. 24 Seattle U L
Rev 1-48 (2000).
Use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner
groups: Is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax
dollars. R.A. Kluender, J.C. Pickett, T.L. Walkingstick. 39 Nat
Resources J 799-818 (1999).
Why is there no international forestry law? an examination of
international forestry regulation, both public and private.
Ronnie D. Lipschutz. 19 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y 153 (Summer 2001).
NATIONAL PARKS
2002 recommended web sites for national parks and Florida parks.
John T. Cardillo. 17 J Land Use & Envtl L 465-477 (2002).
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980: how
ANILCA's provisions on consumptive uses affect backcountry
planning in Alaska national park areas. Andrea K. Hansen. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 435-461 (2002).
Arizona monuments: the controversy over President Clinton's new
designations under the Antiquities Act. James Peck. 36 Ariz
Att'y 10(7) (2000).
Case study in the intersection of law and science: the 1999
report of the Committee of Scientists. Charles F. Wilkinson. 42
Ariz L Rev 307-318 (2000).
Cultural tug of wars: an analysis of the legal issues involving
the NPS proposed rule to allow taking of Golden Eagles at Wupatki
National Monument for religious purposes. Brent Gunson. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 399-433 (2002).
Culture v. conservation: does a proposed special regulation
threaten the integrity of the National Park System. Todd L.
Tisdale. 29 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 111-141 (2001).
Evicting people from nature: indigenous land rights and national
parks in Australia, Russia, and the United States. David
Ostergren, Robert Poirier. 42 Nat Resources J 331-351 (2002).
FAA tarnishes a national park - the Second Circuit ignores
congressional intent and contradicts its own holding in Natural
Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Marsh. Erwin Caban. 67 J Air
L & Commerce 1015-1021 (2002).
Funding our national parks in the 21st century: will we be able
to preserve and protect our embattled national parks. Richard J.
Ansson, Jr.. 11 Fordham Envtl L J 1-58 (1999).
Maine's North Woods: environmental justice and the National Park
proposal. Bonnie Docherty. 24 Harv Envtl L Rev 539-561 (2000).
National Park and Conservation Ass'n v. Stanton: the Niobrara
River's Wild and Scenic river designation environmental impact
statement and general management plan. James Rogers. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 177-194 (2001).
Nature, knowledge and profit: the Yellowstone bioprospecting
controversy and the core purposes of America's national parks.
Holly Doremus. 26 Ecology L Q 401 (August 1999).
New nonimpairment policy projected for the national park system.
William J. Lockhart. 30 Envtl L Rep 10704-10720 (2000).
Protected areas and intergovernmental cooperation in the St.
Elias region. Ryan K. Danby, D. Scott Slocombe. 42 Nat Resources
J 247-282 (2002).
Protecting and preserving our national parks in the twenty first
century: are additional reforms needed above and beyond the
requirements of the 1998 National Parks Omnibus Mgmt Act.
Richard J. Ansson, Jr., Dalton L. Hooks, Jr.. 62 Mont L Rev
213-268 (2001).
Reform in the National Park system: Is vision 2020 enough.
Denise M. Visconti. 23 Seton Hall Legis J 409-441 (1999).
Role of international parks in promoting species retention and
biodiversity. Jarrod H. Becker. 29 Syracuse J Int'l L & Com
371-399 (2002).
Whole world is jumpable, except for national parks. Alison
Brooke Rubenstein. 8 U Balt J Envtl L 150-175 (2001).
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES
Frozen assets? Alaskan oil's threat to national energy security.
L. Hunter Lovins, Amory Lovins. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
135-139 (No. 7, 2001).
Now is the time to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Linda Nichols. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 463-468 (2003).
Protected areas and intergovernmental cooperation in the St.
Elias region. Ryan K. Danby, D. Scott Slocombe. 42 Nat Resources
J 247-282 (2002).
NATURAL GAS
Changing markets and contracts of the LNG business. Paul
Griffin. 21 J Energy & Nat Resources L 85-96 (2003).
Debunking the natural gas "clean energy" myth: coalbed methane on
Wyoming's Powder River Basin. Amy W. Beatie, Thomas F. Darin. 31
Envtl L Rep 10566-10602 (2001).
Deregulation and merger enforcement in the natural gas industry.
David Balto, James Mongoven. 69 Antitrust L J 527-568 (2001).
Joint development of common offshore oil and gas deposits: "mere"
state practice or customary international law. David M. Ong. 93
Am J Int'l L 771-804 (1999).
Limitations on access to public lands and its effect on the
potential supply of natural gas in the United States. . 46
Landman 45-53 (July/Aug 2001).
New Venezuelan legal regime for natural gas:a hopeful new
beginning. Adriana Lezcano, Uisdean R. Vass. 36 Tex Int'l L J
99-139 (2001).
OCS access - impacts and issues - striking a balance:
environmental issues, supply concerns and the U.S. outer
continental shelf. Nicholas Graham. 51 Landman 51-55 (May/June
2006).
Overview of issues common to structuring, negotiating and
documenting LNG projects. Philip R. Weems. 2000 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 189-201 (No. 8, 2000).
Report of the natural gas regulation committee. . 24 Energy L J
231-259 (2003).
Report of the natural gas regulation committee. . 22 Energy L J
451-458 (2001).
Royalty clauses in gas leases: what can lessors deduct now.
Lindsey Warren. 20 Preventive L Rep 23-28 (2002).
NATURAL GAS AGREEMENTS
Mobile-Sierra rule: its illustrious past and uncertain future.
Carmen L. Gentile. 21 Energy L J 353-388 (2000).
Transnational gas projects and their agreement: part II. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 138-145 (No. 6, 2002).
Transnational gas projects and their agreements: part I. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 117-126 (No. 5, 2002).
Transnational gas projects and their agreements: part III. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 166-174 (No. 7, 2002).
NATURAL GAS DEREGULATION
General Motors Corporation v. Tracy. C. Adam Buck. 20 Energy L J
345-356 (1999).
Mobile-Sierra rule: its illustrious past and uncertain future.
Carmen L. Gentile. 21 Energy L J 353-388 (2000).
Natural gas deregulation in Georgia: a market in transition.
Charles T. Autry, Roland F. Hall. 8 Ga Bar J 19(9) (Dec 2002).
What can we expect from restructuring in natural gas
distribution. Jeffrey J. Leitzinger, Steve Ostrover. 21 Energy L
J 51-77 (2000).
NATURAL GAS PRICING
Criteria for the determination of abuse of dominant positions in
network distribution of gas and electricity. Kurt Markert. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 21-24 (No. 2, 2002).
Price discovery and behavior in crude, gasoline, and heating oil
futures. Bahram Adrangi, Arjun Chatrath. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q
279-300 (2002).
U.S. transfer pricing and oil royalties: a cautionary tale.
Henry M. Banta, Lee Ellen Helfrich, JeanAne M. Jiles, Martin
Lobel. 19 Tax Notes Int'l 177-189 (1999).
U.S. west coast petroleum industry in the 1990s: isolated or
globally integrated. Ronald D. Ripple. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q
105-137 (2001).
Why oil prices need to rise: the illusions of oilfield costs and
technology. Matthew R. Simmons. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 231-250
(1999).
NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
Natural gas liquid allocations. Rick K. Wamsley. 19 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-16 (2000).
NATURAL GAS PURCHASE CONTRACTS
Gas balancing issues. Mark D. Christiansen. 19 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 30-51 (2000).
NATURAL GAS SALES CONTRACTS
Fairness is in the eye of the beholder: the conflicting
interpretations of the correct measure of damages for breach of
natural gas contracts containing take-or-pay provisions. Rodrick
J. Coffey. 14 BYU J Pub L 151-171 (1999).
NATURAL GAS STORAGE
Gas directive and the implications for offshore pipelines in the
North Sea. Martha M. Roggenkamp. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
120-131 (No. 6, 2001).
Selected issues in federal condemnations for underground natural
gas storage rights: valuation methods, inverse condemnations, and
trespass. Steven D. McGrew. 51 Case W Res L Rev 131-185 (2000).
NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES
Business dilemma: 21st century natural resource damage
liabilities for 20th century industrial progress. Stacy Lynn
Bettison, E. Lynn Grayson, Christine Picker, Steven M. Siros. 31
Envtl L Rep 11356-11379 (2001).
Environmental rights of indigenous peoples under the Alien Tort
Claims Act, the public trust doctrine and corporate ethics, and
environmental dispute resolution. John Alan Cohan. 20 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 133(53) (2002).
Implications of proposed CERCLA reforms for recoveries of natural
resource damages. Suellen Keiner. 28 Envtl L Rep 10089-10096
(1998).
May be silly, but it's not an answer: the need to accept
contingent valuation methodology in natural resource damage
assessments. Miriam Montesinos. 26 Ecology L Q 48 (1999).
Measuring justice for nature: issues in evaluating and litigating
natural resource damages. James Peck. 14 J Land Use & Envtl L
275-306 (1999).
NRD trustees: to what extent are they truly trustees. Laura
Rowley. 28 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 459-495 (Winter/Spring 2001).
Valuing the environment: courts' struggles with natural resource
damages. Dale B. Thompson. 32 Envtl L 57(33) (2002).
NATURAL RESOURCES
Bibliography. Rona Carstairs, Mairi Robb. 17 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 387-416 (1999).
Broadscale assessments and ecosystem management: four
perspectives. Lance R. Clark, Kent Connaughton, Joan Frey, Susan
Giannettino. 21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 331-348 (2001).
Clark panel: questions and answers. . 27 Ecology L Q 1175 (2001).
Environmental and natural resources provisions in state
constitutions. Bret Adams, Alison Garner. 22 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 73-270 (2002).
Equitable defenses against the government in the natural
resources and environmental law context. Mary V. Laitos, Amy E.
Mang, Danielle V. Smith. 17 Pace Envtl L Rev 273-323 (2000),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Fair division of natural resources. David A. Anderson. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 227-245 (2000-01).
Federal consistency requirements of the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972: it's time to repeal this fundamentally flawed
legislation. Bruce Kuhse. 6 Ocean & Coastal L J 77-108 (2001).
Fragmentation of public domain law and policy: an alternative to
the "shift-to-retention" thesis. Sally K. Fairfax, Leigh
Raymond. 39 Nat Resources J 649-753 (1999).
Future of the Antiquities Act. James R. Rasband. 21 (2B) J Land
Resources & Envtl L 619-634 (2001).
Idaho nibbles at Montana: carving out a third exception for
tribal jurisdiction over environmental and natural resource
management. H. Scott Althouse. 31 Envtl L 721 (2001).
Indian natural resource issues in an orderly system. P.S.
Deloria. 41 Nat Resources J 549-559 (2001).
Irrationality of economic rationality in the restoration of
natural resources. James L. Nicoll. 42 Ariz L Rev 463-481
(2000).
Law of public participation in global energy and resources
development: a new IBA book. Alastair R Lucas, George (Rock)
Pring, Donald N Zillman. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 79-83
(2002).
National incentives to protect natural resources: preserving
their place in international trade. Paul S. Kibel. 29 Envtl L
Rep 10411-10417 (1999).
Natural resources. Patrick F. Higle. 24 U Ark Little Rock L Rev
513-521 (2002).
Natural resources and the White Commission report. Carl Tobias.
79 Oregon L Rev 619-646 (2000).
Natural resources, tax, and other miscellaneous areas. Charles
C. Bailey. 62 Tex B J 788(5) (Sept. 1999).
Navigating the river of our future: the Rio Poco-Grande. William
deBuys. 41 Nat Resources J 265-281 (2001).
Our sedimentation boxes runneth over: public lands soil law as
the missing link in holistic natural resource protection. Peter
M. Lacy. 31 Envtl L 433 (2001).
Performance indicators for natural resource and environmental
policy: contributions from American institutional law and
economics. Michael D. Kaplowitz, Nicholas Mercuro. 11 Duke Envtl
L & Pol'y Forum 139 (2000).
Precontractual agreements in the energy and natural resources
industries - legal implications and basis for liability (civil,
common law and Islamic law). Mirian Kene Omalu. J Bus L 303-331
(2000).
Protection of indigenous peoples' rights over land and natural
resources under the Inter-American human rights system. S. James
Anaya, Robert A. Williams, Jr.. 14 Harv Hum Rts J 33-86 (2001).
Public trust and distrust: the theoretical implications of the
public trust doctrine for natural resource management. Erin
Ryan. 31 Envtl L 477 (2001).
Race, ethnicity, and natural resources in the United States: a
review. John Schelhas. 42 Nat Resources J 723-763 (2002).
Ranking the environmental law, natural resources law, and land
use planning journals: a survey of expert opinion. Gregory Scott
Crespi. 23 William & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 273-297 (1998).
Regionalism in the west: an inventory and assessment. Craig
Fitch, Will Harmon, Matthew McKinney. 23 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 101-191 (2002).
Regulatory takings: a historical overview and legal analysis for
natural resource management. Susan M. Stedfast. 29 Envtl L 881
(1999).
Restoration affecting native resources: the place of native
ecological science. Catherine A. O'Neill. 42 Ariz L Rev 343-380
(2000).
Revisiting Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe: Robert Nordhaus and
sovereign Indian control over natural resources on reservations.
G. Emlen Hall, Robert J. Nordhaus, Anne Alise Rudio. 43 Nat
Resources J 223-284 (2003).
Saving Snake River water and salmon simultaneously: the
biological, economic, and legal case for breeching the lower
Snake River dams, lowering JD reservoir, and restoring
natural.... Michael C. Blumm, Laird J. Lucas, Don B. Miller,
Daniel J. Rohlf, Glen H. Spain. 28 Envtl L 997(1) (1998).
Searching for sustainability. Walter P. Falcon. 27 Ecology L Q
1163 (2001).
Tragically difficult: the obstacles to governing the commons.
Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 30 Envtl L 241-278 (2000).
Transition toward sustainability. William C. Clark. 27 Ecology L
Q 1021 (2001).
Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969: A
western slope perspective on the first thirty years. Sherry A.
Caloia, Mark E. Hamilton, Jefferson V. Houpt. 3 Denv U Water L
Rev 39-57 (1999).
Wildlife: our most valuable public resource. Elizabeth Furse. 6
Animal L I-IV (Annual 2000).
NAVIGABLE WATERS
"Right" to float through private property in Colorado: dispelling
the myth. John R. Hill, Jr.. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 331-350
(2001).
Cows, canoes, and commerce law: how the concept of navigability
provides an answer if you know which question to ask. J.W.
Looney, Steven G. Zraick. 25 U Ark Little Rock L Rev 175-189
(2002).
Evolution of the public trust doctrine and the degradation of
trust resources: courts, trustees and political power in
Wisconsin. Melissa Kwaterski Scanlan. 27 Ecology L Q 135 (2000).
Legal underpinnings of the right to float through private
property in Colorado: a reply to John Hill. Kathy Kanda, Steven
Marlin, Lori Potter. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 457-499 (2002).
Navigability and public use: charting a course up the Sandy
River. Jennie Bricker. 38 Willamette L Rev 93-136 (2002).
OPA's reach: the geographic scope of "navigable waters" under the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Kevin Batik. 21 Rev Litig 419-453
(2002).
Revised definition of "discharge of dredged material": its
legality, practicability, and impact on wetlands protection.
William S. Pufko. 9 Envtl Law 187-252 (2002).
NEGOTIATION
Negotiation: the process of the art. Andrew B. Derman, N.E. Skip
Maryan. 46 Landman 27-39 (Sept/Oct 2001).
NETHERLANDS
New mining act for the Netherlands - the end of a 200-year
debate. Martha Roggenkamp, Christiaan Verwer. 2003 Int'l Energy
L & Tax'n Rev 185-192 (No. 6, 2003).
Reform of Dutch mining legislation. Christiaan Verwer. 1999 Oil
& Gas L & Tax'n Rev 367-370 (No. 12, 1999).
Unitisation disputes: do "pendulum procedures" offer fairness in
equity redeterminations. Alan Steele-Nicholson. 2001 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 234-240 (No. 10, 2001).
NEW ZEALAND
Core values and water resources. W.M. Karaitiana. New Zealand L
J 337(5) (1999).
Geothermal resources in New Zealand: a legal history. Richard P.
Boast. 6 Canterbury L Rev 1-24 (Annual 1995).
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
Resource management: public and private costs. Owen McShane. New
Zealand L J 27(5) (Feb 2002).
NIGERIA
Compensation for damage arising from oil operations: Shell
Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria v. Ambah revisited.
Kaniye S. A. Ebeku. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 155-163 (No.
7, 2002).
Compensation for damage arising from oil operations: Shell
Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria v. Ambah revisited - a
rejoinder. Olawale Animashaun. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
164-165 (No. 7, 2002).
Environmental regulation in the Nigerian mining industry: past,
present and future. N L Usman. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L
230-243 (2001).
Environmental rights, pipeline vandalisation and conflict
resolution in Nigeria. Lawrence Atsegbua. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 89-92 (No. 5, 2001).
How can Nigeria develop a domestic market for its gas. Adeoye
Adefulu. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 99-103 (No. 4, 2000).
Impediments to expansion: Why is the upstream sector of Nigeria's
petroleum industry not growing. Bode Agoro. 19 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 16-30 (2001).
Legal issues arising from the termination of oil prospecting
licences by the Nigerian government. Abba Kolo. 19 J Energy &
Nat Resources L 164-175 (2001).
NDDC - another shot at infrastructural development of Nigeria's
oil producing areas. Emeka Chianu. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 214-218 (No. 9, 2001).
New regime for solid mineral development in Nigeria. O A
Odiase-Alegimenlen. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 344-363 (2001).
Nigeria licensing: notes for prospective bidders. Edward
Vera-Cruz. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 301-306 (2000).
Nigeria's LNG project: developments, prospects and challenges.
Bode Agoro. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 85-88 (No. 5, 2001).
Nigeria: new legislation for the deep offshore and inland basin
operations. Chika Onwuekwe, Victor Onyenkpa. 1999 Oil & Gas L &
Tax'n Rev 307-310 (No. 11, 1999).
Nigerian oil industry privatisation process: an alternative.
Bode Agoro. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 225-227 (No. 9,
2000).
Nigerian privatisation legislation and its implications for the
Nigerian energy industry. Adeoye Adefulu. 2000 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 219-224 (No. 9, 2000).
Recent legislative developments in production sharing contracts
in Nigeria. Chijioke E. Emole. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
72-74 (February 2000).
Recent legislative developments in production sharing contracts
in Nigeria. Chijioke E. Emole. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
72-74 (No. 2, 2000).
Resource control. Lawrence Atsegbua. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 261-263 (No. 10, 2002).
Review of the Niger-Delta Development Commission Act 2000.
Adewale Ajayi. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 58-59 (No. 3,
2001).
Section 18(4B) of Nigeria's Petroleum Profits Tax Act impacts
investors in oil industry. Chika B. Onwuekwe, Lekan Salami. 22
Tax Notes Int'l 712-715 (2001).
Tax implications of recent developments in the Nigerian oil and
gas industry. Adewale Ajayi. 30 Tax Notes Int'l 381-383 (2003).
Withholding tax administration in Nigeria: the oil and gas
industry in perspective. Adewale Ajayi, Chika B. Onwuekwe. 21
Tax Notes Int'l 2607-2615 (2000).
Withholding tax administration in Nigeria: the oil and gas
industry in perspective. Adewale Ajayi, Chika B. Onwuekwe. 2001
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 95-101 (No. 5, 2001).
NORTH SEA
Coming of age - the UKOITC North Sea memorandum. Peter Landon.
1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 274-279 (No. 9/10, 1999).
Gas directive and the implications for offshore pipelines in the
North Sea. Martha M. Roggenkamp. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
120-131 (No. 6, 2001).
Taxing North Sea oil. John H. Bartlett. 2002 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 267-280 (No. 11, 2002).
OCEAN RESOURCES
So your client wants to engage in deep seabed mining. Houston
Putnam Lowry. 5 ILSA J Int'l & Comp L 325-329 (1999).
OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT
1979 and 1990 Malaysia - Thailand joint development agreements: a
model for international legal co-operation in common offshore
petroleum deposits. David M. Ong. 14 Int'l J Marine & Coastal L
207-246 (1999).
Conflict between the establishment and operation of offshore oil
installations, navigation and other uses of the sea in
international law: part I. Hossein Esmaeili. 2002 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 286-290 (No. 11, 2002).
Conflict between the establishment and operation of offshore oil
installations, navigation and other uses of the sea in
international law; Part 2. Hossein Esmaeili. 2002 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 293-300 (No. 12, 2002).
Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations in European
waters: the end of a decade of indecision. John Woodliffe. 14
Int'l J Marine & Coastal L 101-123 (1999).
Deferred and lost off-shore production: what you can and cannot
recover. Steve Roberts. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 256-258
(No. 11, 2001).
Environmental protest and the law. Stephen Tromans. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 342-348 (No. 12, 1999).
Environmental regulation of the UK offshore oil and gas industry.
Jeremy Rowan-Robinson. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 267-283
(2000).
European environmental law goes offshore. Stephen Tromans. 2
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 75-77 (February 2000).
Joint development of common offshore oil and gas deposits: "mere"
state practice or customary international law. David M. Ong. 93
Am J Int'l L 771-804 (1999).
Offshore construction projects - disputes and their resolution.
Mark Morrison, Alex Panayides. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
113-119 (No. 6, 2001).
Offshore gumbo: NTLs, FPSOs, OMM, MMS-2005, OSFR, DWWR, SOOs,
SOPs, etc. - current offshore regulatory and due diligence issues
for the land professional. Jonathan A. Hunter. 46 Landman 47-58
(May/June 2001).
Protection of offshore oil rigs in international law (part I).
Hossein Esmaeili. 18 Austl Mining & Petroleum L J 241-252 (1999).
Regulation of offshore petroleum activites in Ireland. James
Bruining, Michael O'Connor. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 132-142
(2001).
Solicitor's opinion updating Maynard and McElroy's articles (that
appeared in Volume 2 of this review). John Leshy. 3 Denv U Water
L Rev 94-97 (1999).
OIL & GAS (See also 0&G Royalties, Royalties,Private and Royalty Valuation
Management, Federal & Indian]}
AAPL Model Form Operating Agreement after Cone v. Fagadau - where
are we now. Michel E. Curry. 48 Landman 15-21 (July/Aug 2003).
Coalbed methane development: the costs and benefits of an
emerging energy resource. Gary C. Bryner. 43 Nat Resources J
519-560 (2003).
Coalbed methane: degasification, not ventilation, should be
required. Wendy B. Davis. 2 Appalachian J L 25-35(2003).
Comparative analysis of the influence of the rule of capture on
oil and gas conservation legislation in Texas and Oklahoma.
Stuart T. MacDonald. 52 Oil Gas & Energy Q 289-314 (2003).
Energy and flexibility in technology. William B. Joyce. 52 Oil
Gas & Energy Q 387-395 (2003).
Issues, opportunities, and pitfalls in like-kind exchanges of oil
and gas properties. Robert McCann, Robert Pulliam. 22 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 102-121 (2003).
Judging made too easy: the judicial exaggeration of exculpatory
and liability-limiting clauses in the oilfield's operator
fiduciary cases. John Burritt McArthur. 56 SMU L Rev 925-974
(2003).
Liquefied natural gas: regulation in a competitive natural gas
market. Gearold L. Knowles. 24 Energy L J 293-319 (2003).
Local governmental jurisdiction of oil and gas operations - is
there still a home court advantage. Michael J. Wozniak. 48
Landman 49-56 (July/Aug 2003).
Marketable condition rule. Scott Lansdown. 44 S Tex L Rev
667-707 (2003), reprinted in 41 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2004).
Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002. Susan A. Moore, Theresa
I. Zolet. 24 Energy L J 107-130 (2003).
Purchase and sale agreement checklist. Arthur J. Wright. 48
Landman 41-49 (Nov/Dec 2003).
Stopping fraud in the oil patch. D. Larry Crumbley, Santanu
Mitra. 52 Oil Gas & Energy Q 19-34 (2003).
Waste or wasted? Rethinking the regulation of coalbed methane
byproduct water in the Rocky Mountains: a comparative analysis of
approaches to coalbed methane produced water quantity legal.
Thomas F. Darin. 17 J Envtl L & Litig 281-341 (2002).
OIL & GAS ROYALTIES
Post-production deductions from royalty. Edward B. Poitevent,
II. 44 S Tex L Rev 709-764 (2003).
Post-production deductions from royalty governing natural gas.
Edward B. Poitevent, II. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 34-57
(2003).
Wrestling with clouds - calculating royalties under new implied
covenants of marketability. Keith D. Tooley. 48 Landman 15-21
(Sept/Oct 2003).
OIL AND GAS
1989 AAPL Model Form Operating Agreement: Why are you not using
it. Isabel Amadeo, Andrew B. Derman. 49 Landman 21-37 (Mar/Apr
2004).
Actual share repurchases and capital gains in the oil and gas
industry. Thomas G. Noland, Kenneth M. Washer. 51 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 93-100 (2002).
Aftermath of the Pool case. Laura Burney. 50 Landman 11-26
(Nov/Dec 2005).
Allocation of production, confusion of goods & issues on the edge
of pooling. George A. Snell III. 49 Landman 13-26 (Jan/Feb
2004).
Appropriateness of imposing common carrier status on interstate
natural gas pipelines. John P. Gregg, William A. Mogel. 25
Energy L J 21-56 (2004).
Balancing of coal and coalbed methane interests within the
coalbed methane statutory schemes of Virginia, West Virginia and
Kentucky. Sharon O. Flanery, Leslie R. Miller-Stover. 19 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 137-191 (2004-05).
Bankruptcy issues in oil and gas. David W. Elmquist. 45 Landman
33-44 (Jan/Feb 2000).
Battle between the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
and local governments: a call for a new comprehensive approach.
Angela Neese. 76 U Colo L Rev 561-597 (2005).
Beyond the standard lease form - selected oil & gas lease issues.
Richard D. Watt. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil
Plays 11-1(11) (2004).
Canada's role in the United States' oil and gas supply security:
oil sands, Arctic gas, NAFTA, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol
impacts. Alastair R. Lucas. 25 Energy L J 403-429 (2004).
Class action litigation comes to the oil patch. Charles W.
Schwartz. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 63-104 (2001), reprinted
in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Coalbed methane development in the intermountain West: producing
energy and protecting water. Gary Bryner. 4 Wyo L Rev 541-557
(2004), reprinted in 41 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation
Journal (2004).
Coalbed methane ownership rights in Wyoming. Bobbier Johnson. 8
Great Plains Nat Resources J 46-54 (2004).
Coalbed natural gas in the Powder River Basin. Joseph C.
Icenogle. 49 Landman 11-17 (July/Aug 2004).
Confused state of oil and gas royalty check stub law. Mark D.
Christiansen. 17 Tex Oil & Gas L J 13-21` (2003).
Contracts, combination, conspiracies, and conservation: antitrust
in oil unitization and the intertemporal problem. Chiawen C.
Kiew. 99 Nw U L Rev 931-970 (2005).
Contracts, combination, conspiracies, and conservation: antitrust
in oil unitization and the intertemporal problem. Chiawen C.
Kiew. 99 Nw U L Rev 931-970 (2005).
Controlling water pollution from coalbed methane drilling: an
analysis of discharge permit requirements. Sharon Buccino, Steve
Jones. 4 Wyo L Rev 559-583 (2004).
Cooperative environmental assessments: their increasing role in
oil and gas projects. Judith Hanebury. 24 Dalhousie L J 87-106
(2001).
Corbello v. Iowa Production - lessons learned from Louisiana.
Covert J. Geary. 50 Landman 11-23 (Sept/Oct 2005).
Current issues involving the statute of limitations. Ernest E.
Smith. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 25-46 (2001).
Deciding to tolerate ambiguity: Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co. and
"at the well" language to determine royalty allocation in oil and
gas leases. Lisa-Marie France. 56 Ark L Rev 903-928 (2004).
Demanding beneficial use: opportunities and obligations for
Wyoming regulators in coalbed methane. Kate Fox, Anne MacKinnon.
6 Wyo L Rev 369-399 (2006).
Determining "marketable product" for gas royalty valuation in
Oklahoma. Frederick M. Scott. 49 Landman 35-40 (May/June 2004).
District of Columbia Circuit's new found vigilance over costly
regulations affecting the petroleum refining industry. Stuart
O'Neal. 12 Vill Envtl L J 269-293 (2001).
Drilling and operating in the urban jungle. James P. Wason. Dev
Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 2-1(52) (2004).
Drilling in the cities and towns: rights and obligations of
lessees, royalty owners, and surface owners in an urban
environment. Bruce M. Kramer. 23 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
58-80 (2004).
Drilling in the cities and towns: rights and obligations of
lessees, royalty owners, and surface owners in an urban
environment. Bruce M. Kramer. 23 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
39-71 (2004).
Environmental justice risks in the petroleum industry. Walter
Block, Roy Whitehead, Jr.. 24 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 67-88
(2000).
Evaluating the jurisprudential bases for ascertaining or defining
coalbed methane ownership. David E. Pierce. 4 Wyo L Rev 607-628
(2004), reprinted in 41 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation
Journal (2004).
Expansion of the Barnett Shale Play Fort Worth Basin - Texas.
David F. Martineau. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil
Plays 5-1(23) (2004).
Exploring the origins of royalty disputes. David E. Pierce. 23
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 72-111 (2004).
Federal government as a useful enemy: perspectives on the Bush
energy/environmental agenda from the Texas oilfields. Jacqueline
Lang Weaver. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 1-48 (2001).
Gathering and other post-production facilities - a producer's
perspective. Arthur J. Wright. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern
Gas & Oil Plays 13-1(57) (2004).
Information effects associated with the GCOs in the oil and gas
industry: contagion or competitive. K. Michael Casey, Mark
Schaub, Anita B. Williams. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 731-743 (2003).
Interpreting the royalty obligation by looking at the express
language: what a novel idea. Bruce M. Kramer. 35 Tex Tech L Rev
223-263 (2004).
Irretrievable breakdown? A review of operator/contractor
relationships in the offshore oil and gas industry. Helen
Franklin. 23 J Energy & Nat Resources L 1-14 (2005).
Land rustling Texas style and recent efforts to corral the
rustlers. Thomas A. Zabel. 51 Landman 15-29 (May/June 2006).
Legal and policy dilemma of offshore oil and gas development.
Kim Harb. 19 Nat Resources & Env't 23(5) (2004).
Like-kind exchanges: the basics and beyond. Andrew F. Gelson. 24
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 26-51 (2005).
Local government regulation in Texas. Dwight A. "Ike" Shupe.
Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use
in Mineral Extraction Operations 13B-1(22) (2005).
Local land use regulation of oil & gas development. Alison E.
Barry. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 3-1(37)
(2004).
Local regulation of oil & gas development in Colorado. Ken
Wonstolen. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 13A-1(9) (2005).
Local regulation of oil and gas operations: don't all homeowners
want a pumpjack in their backyard. Bruce Kramer. 41 Rocky Mt Min
L Fdn J 213-264 (No. 2, Fall 2004).
Local regulation of oil and gas operations: the Rockies
experience. David R. Little. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern
Gas & Oil Plays 7-1(22) (2004).
Local regulation of oil and gas operations: the Texas experience.
Sarah Fullenwider, Martin Garza, Dorothy G. Palumbo, Julie
Smith. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 6-1(180)
(2004).
Managing environmental liability when acquiring oil and gas
properties. Boyd A. Bryan. 49 Landman 37-50 (Sept/Oct 2004),
reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J 185-216 (No. 1, 2005).
Managing the risk of sanctions in the global oil & gas industry:
corporate response under political, legal and commercial
pressures. Thomas W. Walde. 36 Tex Int'l L J 183-229 (2001).
Minority of one? The reasons to reject the Texas Supreme Court's
recent abandonment of the duty to market in market-value leases.
John Burritt McArthur. 37 Tex Tech L Rev 271-325 (2005).
Mixing surface development with oil and gas operations - part I.
Carleton Ekberg, Polly Jessen. 34 Colo Law 11-22 (May 2005).
Model contracts: a survey of the global petroleum industry. A.
Timothy Martin. 22 J Energy & Nat Resources L 281-339 (2004).
Multi-layered, and sequential, state and local barriers to
extractive resource development. Elizabeth H. Getches, Jan G.
Laitos. 23 Va Envtl L J 1-41 (2004).
Multinational corporations and compliance with international
regulations relating to the petroleum industry. Emeka Duruigbo.
7 Ann Surv Int'l & Comp L 101-146 (2001).
Municipal regulatory authority vis-a-vis mineral development in
Texas. Bryn Meredith, E. Allen Taylor, Jr.. Dev Issues &
Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 4-1(10) (2004).
NAPE online brings e-commerce to the oil and gas industry. James
R. McNeil. 45 Landman 22-24 (Jan/Feb 2000).
Natural gas gathering line safety regulation: potential impact on
oil and gas development. W. Jonathan Airey. Dev Issues &
Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 14-1(32) (2004).
New COPAS 2005 accounting procedure. Mike Cougevan, Al E.
McClellan. 51 Landman 37-50 (May/June 2006).
New era for petroleum exploration licensing. Daniel Johnston. 24
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 92-100 (2005).
North American energy policy and the role of offshore production
and exploration. Tanner Trimble. 50 Landman 39-44 (May/June
2005).
OCS access - impacts and issues - striking a balance:
environmental issues, supply concerns and the U.S. outer
continental shelf. Nicholas Graham. 51 Landman 51-55 (May/June
2006).
Oil & gas law: royalty valuation: burdening lessees with an
implied duty to deliver gas to a marketable location. Adam
Marshall. 56 Okla L Rev 233-258 (2003).
Oil and gas documents affecting title - (Part I). H. Martin
Gibson. 50 Landman 37-50 (July/Aug 2005).
Oil and gas documents affecting title - Part II. H. Martin
Gibson. 50 Landman 43-60 (Sept/Oct 2005).
Oil and gas documents affecting title - part III. H. Martin
Gibson. 50 Landman 41-59 (Nov/Dec 2005).
Operation executive freedom (of contract): following the
executive's fiduciary obligation from Manges to Magruder in
mineral leasing. John B. Fowles. 2004 BYU L Rev 235-282 (2004).
Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. Kamyar
Mehdiyoun. 94 Am J Int'l L 179-189 (2000).
Piecemeal legislative proposals: an inappropriate approach to
managing offshore oil drilling. Lynn S. Sletto. 33 Golden Gate U
L Rev 557-588 (2003).
Political mobilization, venue change, and the coal bed methane
conflict in Montana and Wyoming. Robert J. Duffy. 45 Nat
Resources J 409-440 (2005).
Post-production deductions from royalty governing natural gas.
Edward B. Poitevent, II. 23 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 24-57
(2004).
Privatization in the international petroleum industry: the
interplay between politics, economics, and reliance. John E.
Rhea. 33 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 609(31) (2005).
Production in "paying quantities" - a fresh look. Patrick S.
Ottinger. 65 La L Rev 635-676 (2005).
Questioning the rule of capture metaphor for nineteenth century
public land law: a look at R.S. 2477. James R. Rasband. 35 Envtl
L 1005(43) (2005).
Recent developments in pipeline condemnation law. Thomas J.
Forestier. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays
12-1(85) (2004).
Reconstituting the natural gas industry from wellhead to
burnertip. Richard J. Pierce, Jr.. 25 Energy L J 57-112 (2004).
Reflections on the oil, gas, and energy resources law section. .
68 Tex BJ 848(4) (Oct 2005).
Remedies for defrauded purchasers of oil and gas interests under
the securities laws. Nelson S. Ebaugh. 51 Landman 53-62
(July/Aug 2006).
Reporting issues for year 2000 in the oil and gas industry.
Luann Bean, Bill D. Jarnagin, Charles Nichols. 18 Petroleum Acct
& Fin Mgmt J 111-128 (1999).
Reporting non-GAAP earnings in the oil and gas industry: a
preliminary investigation and analysis. Tracy S. Manly, Jason
Rodrigue. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 101-114 (2002).
Restatement (First) of the oilfield operator's fiduciary duty.
John Burritt McArthur. 45 Nat Resources J 587-776 (2005).
Restoring investor confidence through improved reserves,
estimation and reporting. D. Ronald Harrell, John E. Hodgin. 51
Landman 27-37 (Mar/Apr 2006).
Role of captives and the rule of capture. Lea VanderVelde. 35
Envtl L 649(23) (2005).
Royalty issues created by marketing through affiliates: some
problems and perspectives. Craig A. Haynes. 24 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 1-25 (2005).
Rule of capture - an oil and gas perspective. Owen L. Anderson,
Bruce M. Kramer. 35 Envtl L 899(56) (2005).
Rule of capture and the economic dynamics of natural resource use
and survival under open access management regimes. Jason Scott
Johnston. 35 Envtl L 855(44) (2005).
Runsheet 101. Randall K. Sadler. 51 Landman 61-69 (Mar/Apr
2006).
Section 1031 like-kind exchanges: deferred exchanges of oil, gas,
and other mineral properties. David P. Goad, J.F. Howell, III.
68 Tex BJ 824(5) (Oct 2005).
Securities liability in the oil patch - a trap for the unwary.
Arthur J. Wright. 49 Landman 11-17 (May/June 2004).
Stabilization clauses in international petroleum transactions.
Margarita T.B. Coale. 30 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 217(21) (2002).
Swift rise of coalbed methane mining in the West: requiring a
careful analysis before development starts. Erin Arnold, Jr.. 25
J Land Resources & Envtl L 119-130 (2005).
Take-or-pay royalties, the trust doctrine and the Shoshone case.
Christopher S. Kulander. 29 Am Indian L Rev 101-125 (2005).
Takings litigation - compensable regulatory takings in Texas.
Dwight Shupe. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays
8-1(49) (2004).
Taxation of oil and gas in the United States 1970-1997. Mitch
Kunce, William E. Morgan. 45 Nat Resources J 77-101 (2005).
Temporary cessation of production doctrine: litigating cessation
of production and termination of oil and gas leases... what the
heck does "or the like" mean anyway. Lynette S. Wilson. 35 Tex
Tech L Rev 311-345 (2004).
Ten things landmen do to irritate their lawyers. John C.
Heymann. 68 Tex BJ 842(6) (Oct 2005).
The new AAPL form 610 JOA coalbed methane checklist: making the
list and how to check it twice. Fred MacDonald. 51 Landman 31-47
(July/Aug 2006).
Three cases/four tales: commons, capture, the public trust, and
property in land. Dale E. Goble. 35 Envtl L 807(47) (2005).
Update on the regulation and development of methane produced from
coal formations. Gregory R. Danielson, Jon Tjornehoj. Dev Issues
& Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 9-1(30) (2004).
Web resources for the oil, gas and energy industry. Steve
Olshewsky, L. Murphy Smith. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 883-896 (2001).
What has become of due diligence. Linda Ensley. 50 Landman 53-55
(July/Aug 2005).
What oil and gas companies need to know about unclaimed property:
a primer for the industry. Anthony Andreoli, G. Samuel
Schaunaman, Frank D. Spiegelberg. 50 Landman 11-19 (July/Aug
2005).
Wyoming's Powder River Basin: a study in federal royalty
valuation. Drake D. Hill, Thomas F. Reese. 4 Wyo L Rev 629-642
(2004).
OIL AND GAS AGREEMENTS
Aspects of international petroleum agreements. Don Greenfield,
Bob Rooney. 37 Alta L Rev 352-386 (1999).
Limitations Act and oil and gas transactions. Allan D. Nielsen,
Darwin A. Schofer. 37 Alta L Rev 285-301 (1999).
Rights of first refusal in oil and gas transactions: a
progressive analysis. Clifford D. Johnson, David J. Stanford. 37
Alta L Rev 316-351 (1999).
Selected issues in purchase and sale agreements for oil and gas
properties. Arthur J. Wright. 48 Landman 25-40 (Jan/Feb 2003),
reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
Self-enforcing provisions of oil and gas unit operating
agreements: theory and evidence. Gary D. Libecap, James L.
Smith. 15 J L Econ & Org 526-548 (1999).
Stattory and contractual indemnification and forum selection,
including the Oil Patch. Edward S. Johnson, Cindy T. Matherne.
24 Tul Mar L J 85-124 (1999).
OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT
Environmental impacts of international finance corporation
lending and proposals for reform: A case study of conservation
and oil development in the Guatemalan Peten. Ian A. Bowles,
Cyril F. Kormos, James D. Nations, Conrad C.S. Reining, Amy B.
Rosenfeld. 29 Envtl L 103 (Spring 1999).
Environmental protest and the law. Stephen Tromans. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 342-348 (No. 12, 1999).
Interest group competition and the Alaska Native Land Claims
Settlement Act. John R. Boyce, Mats A.N. Nilsson. 39 Nat
Resources J 755-798 (1999).
Key concerns of governments and oil companies: alignment of
interests. Daniel Johnston. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-12
(2000).
NEPA and oil and gas development on federal lands: a primer for
landmen. A. John Davis, Constance Lundberg. 47 Landman 47-61
(Jan/Feb 2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2002).
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION
Access to our backyard reserves: a final resolution of the
western Gulf of Mexico's maritime boundaries. Dabney Welsh. 23
Hous J Int'l L 609 (2001).
Accounting for site closure and environmental costs: a new maze
of standards and requirements. Charlotte J. Wright. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 481-494 (2000).
Benchmark performance ratios for oil and gas industry
independents 1999 and 2000. Hugh Grove, Tommi Johnsen, C.W.
MacLeod, Ron Rizzuto. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 10-24
(2001).
Canadian finance minister proposes amendments to resource tax
regime. Brian R. Carr, Christopher P. Moser. 19 Tax Notes Int'l
797-800 (1999).
Debunking the natural gas "clean energy" myth: coalbed methane on
Wyoming's Powder River Basin. Amy W. Beatie, Thomas F. Darin. 31
Envtl L Rep 10566-10602 (2001).
Deferred and lost off-shore production: what you can and cannot
recover. Steve Roberts. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 256-258
(No. 11, 2001).
How hedging and futures relate to exploration, production and
landmen. Bryan Guderian. 46 Landman 11-18 (Sept/Oct 2001).
Mergers decrease exploration. Michael T. Halbouty. 47 Landman
33(1) (Sept/Oct 2002).
Pending energy crisis: would a new oil and gas tax system help.
Frank M. Burke. 90 Tax Notes 1097-1099 (2001).
Production - sharing agreements: the commercial implications of
their development. Martyn R. David, Susan Hodgshon. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 302-306 (No. 11, 1999).
Reduce asset impairments reported under SFAS 121. Jeff P. Boone,
Teddy L. Coe. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-9 (2001).
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (February
2000).
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (No. 2,
2000).
Transnational corporate behavior and its disparate and unjust
effects on the indigenous cultures and the environment of
developing nations: Jota v. Texaco, a case study. Scott Holwick.
11 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 183-221 (2000).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, III. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-72 (1999).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith III. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
67-105 (2000).
OIL AND GAS INTERESTS
Oil and gas title searches and notice under the Surface
Development Notification Act. Richard H. Bate. 31 Colo Law
113-119 (Oct 2002).
Ownership of transmigratory minerals, Utah and zebras: proof that
oil and gas ownership law needs reform. Jared C. Bennett. 21
(2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 349-396 (2001).
OIL AND GAS LAW
Comparative review of oil and gas law in Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, New Mexico, Mississippi & Louisiana. Tom Daily,
Timothy Dowd, John McDavid, Gregory Nibert, Richard Revels,
George Snell. 47 Landman 33-120 (Nov/Dec 2002).
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 44 Landman 41-57
(Nov/Dec 1999).
Comparison of oil and gas law in Texas and California. James M.
Day, Jr., Sean B. Murphy, George A. Snell, III. 45 Landman 45-64
(Jan/Feb 2000).
Developments in non-regulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
48 Landman 11-22 (May/June 2003).
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Emerging "duty of fair dealing" in contract interpretation.
Nathan R. Coleman. 40 Washburn L J 561-592 (2001).
From a legal perspective. Laura Burney. 47 Landman 23-27
(Jan/Feb 2002).
From wellhead to gas pump: new oil and gas laws. Allan W. Dees,
Benjamin W. Sebree. 64 Tex B J 809(5) (September 2001).
Kansas oil and gas law: defining the duty between participants in
a joint operating agreement. Richard James. 39 Washburn L J
128-142 (1999).
Oil, gas and mineral law. Richard F. Brown. 55 SMU L Rev
1219-1269 (2002).
Oil, gas and mineral law. Richard F. Brown. 52 SMU L Rev
1323-1336 (1999).
Surface use by mineral owner: how much accommodation is required
under current oil and gas law. Christopher M. Alspach. 55 Okla L
Rev 89-119 (2002), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2003).
OIL AND GAS LEASES
Application of the discovery rule to damages arising out of oil
and gas leases. Melanie Martin. 31 St Mary's L J 199-233 (2001).
Background history of directional drilling in Michigan.
Christine A. Klein. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L 173-176
(2002).
Basics of directional drilling. Harold Fitch. 2002 L Rev Mich St
Univ-Detroit C L 177-185 (2002).
Benefits of and legal authority for directional drilling under
the Great Lakes. Daniel L. Pulter. 2002 L Rev Mich St
Univ-Detroit C L 193-206 (2002).
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Directional drilling from the Great Lakes shoreline: not worth
the risk. Tanya Cabala. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L
207-212 (2002).
Directional drilling: a flawed policy places resources at risk.
James Clift. 2002 L Rev Mich St Univ-Detroit C L 187-192 (2002).
Discovery rule: should oil and gas leases be different. Jennifer
N. Cooper. 38 Hous L Rev 1283-1312 (2001).
Federal oil & gas leasing - a summary of leasing & problems.
Mark Dolar, Lane Lasrich. 48 Landman 28-29 (May/June 2003).
Have you ever wondered? What is alternative dispute resolution
and what relevance does it have to me as a landman. Bill
Patterson. 45 Landman 11-12 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Implied marketing covenant in oil and gas leases: the producer's
perspective. Scott Lansdown. 31 St. Mary's L J 297-358 (2000),
reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Interpreting mineral and royalty deeds: the legacy of the
one-eighth royalty and other stories. Laura H. Burney. 33 St
Mary's L J 1-55 (2001).
Kansas oil and gas law: defining the duty between participants in
a joint operating agreement. Richard James. 39 Washburn L J
128-142 (1999).
Landman's contribution in a co2 flood project. Fred E. Schantz.
45 Landman 57-63 (Mar/Apr 2000).
Little saltwater disposal on the wound: the Louisiana supreme
court's decision in Corbello v. Shell Oil Company. Michael G.
Durand, Gary P. Kraus, Brent G. Sonnier. 48 Landman 55-66
(May/June 2003).
Midstream assets: issues emerging from a changing business. J.
Jay Park. 38 Alta L Rev 47-73 (2000).
Mobil Oil Exploration, environmental protection, and contract
repudiation: It's time to recognize the public trust in the Outer
Continental Shelf. Robin Kundis Craig. 30 Envtl L Rep
11104-11121 (2000).
Natural gas royalties - lessor vs. lessee and the implied
covenant to market. Jeff King. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
17-29 (2000).
Oil and gas. George Arceneaux. 46 Loyola L Rev 1-20 (2000).
Oil and gas: lessor's distant beacon of hope - will Oklahoma see
it. Stephen Joseph Capron. 52 Okla L Rev 145-161 (1999).
Oil and gas: top - leasing - unethical claim-jumping or prudent
business practice. Marichiel Lewis. 52 Okla L Rev 127-143
(1999).
Postle field co2 project phase II - land responsibilities - a
firsthand viewpoint. Fred E. Schantz. 45 Landman 57-64 (July/Aug
2000).
Precedent trap and the irrational persistence of the Vela rule.
John Burritt McArthur. 39 Houston L Rev 979-1031 (2002).
Preservation of overriding royalties - now you see them, now you
don't. John R. Woodward. 45 Landman 51-62 (Sept/Oct 2000).
Producers, royalty owners, and Enron. Allen D. Cummings. 65 Tex
B J 57(2) (Jan 2002).
Prudent operator standard: applications beyond the oil and gas
lease. Gary B. Conine. 41 Nat Resources J 23-76 (2001),
reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Recent cases on the calculation of royalties on First Nations'
lands. Nigel Bankes, L. Douglas Rae. 38 Alta L Rev 258-293
(2000).
Recent judicial and legislative developments affecting
measurement and payment of royalties on private leases.
Jacqueline Lang Weaver. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 38-71
(2002).
Rule to spare them reasoning: California courts of appeal "find"
that oil and gas leases are to be interpreted liberally in favor
of the lessor and strictly against the lessee. John Quirk. 18
Cal Real Prop J 27(33) (2000).
Significant lease acquisition issues from the landowner's
perspective. Dan C. Perry. 47 Landman 65-79 (Mar/Apr 2002).
Supreme Court orders federal government to return more than $150
million to oil companies. H. David Gold. 28 Ecology L Q 550-552
(2001).
Temporary cessation of production: the panhandle cases. Ernest
E. Smith. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-17 (2003).
Texas v. ExxonMobil: a bounty hunter's dream or has the state
grabbed a tiger by its tail. Bill Patterson. 46 Landman 54-57
(2001).
This little company went to market: IPAA v. DeWitt and the duty
to market federal oil and gas production at no cost to the
lessor. Sarah L. Inderbitzin. 54 Admin L Rev 1167-1212 (2002).
U.S. transfer pricing and oil royalties: a cautionary tale.
Henry M. Banta, Lee Ellen Helfrich, JeanAne M. Jiles, Martin
Lobel. 19 Tax Notes Int'l 177-189 (1999).
OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION
Interest rates and the optimal allocation of oil and gas over
time. William Joyce. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 67-75
(2001).
Iranian interests in the Caspian Sea region. H. Ghanimi Fard.
2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 162-169 (No. 7, 2001).
Production - sharing agreements: the commercial implications of
their development. Martyn R. David, Susan Hodgshon. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 302-306 (No. 11, 1999).
Rhoades oil company decision demonstrates how the phc tax can
affect oil and gas producers. Richard C. Hatfield, James Jay
Mackie. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 117-123 (2000).
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (February
2000).
Role of health and safety legislation for oil and gas activities.
Marco Reggiani. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-71 (No. 2,
2000).
Tech startups in E&P: investigating software solutions. Jim
Hoffman. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 89-93 (2003).
Temporary cessation of production: the panhandle cases. Ernest
E. Smith. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-17 (2003).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, III. 18 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-72 (1999).
Use of law to promote domestic exploration and production. Owen
L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith III. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
67-105 (2000).
OIL AND GAS WELLS
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: in the debate over drilling in
the refuge's coastal plain, the environment is the only true
loser. Sheila Weigert. 8 Envtl Law 169-187 (2001).
Did the Eleventh Circuit crack "frac?" Hydraulic fracturing after
the court's landmark LEAF decision (Legal Environmental
Assistance Foundation). Markus G. Puder. 18 Va Envtl L J 507-554
(1999).
Economics of mixed blessings. William Bornstein. 8 Envtl Law
239-263 (2001).
Hey, that's my dirt! Subsurface trespass in horizontally drilled
wells. Joy Stevens. 45 Landman 47-65 (May/June 2000), reprinted
in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Information is Alaska's greatest untapped resource. Samantha K.
Sherman. 8 Envtl Law 215-238 (2001).
Natural gas liquid allocations. Rick K. Wamsley. 19 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 1-16 (2000).
Needed: tax relief for independent producers. Linda M. Nichols.
48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 475-479 (2000).
OIL SPILLS
Practical guide to the oil spill liability trust fund claim
submission procedures. George M. Chalos. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
80-93 (1999).
OPERATING AGREEMENTS
Development of the Model Form Operating Agreement: an
interpretative accounting. John R. Reeves, J. Matthew Thompson.
54 Okla L Rev 211-283 (2001).
Duties of the operator to royalty owners. J. Robert Beatty. 20
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 43-59 (2001).
Fiduciary responsibilities to venture partners. Joseph E. Berg,
III, Dennis Keeley, Kerry Shapiro. 44 Landman 47-57 (Sept/Oct
1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Highlights of key revisions - 2002 AIPN model form international
operating agreement. Michael Bolton, Philip Weems. 2003 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 169-184 (No. 6, 2003).
Maintenance of uniform interest provision: are you at risk.
Dorsey T. Roach. 48 Landman 11-19 (Mar/Apr 2003).
Self-enforcing provisions of oil and gas unit operating
agreements: theory and evidence. Gary D. Libecap, James L.
Smith. 15 J L Econ & Org 526-548 (1999).
Subleases, overriding royalty interests and reversionary rights.
R. Thomas Jorden, Jr., Margaret D. Swords. 46 Landman 9-16
(May/June 2001).
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
Drilling through the muddied waters on the Outer Continental
Shelf: an examination of the Fifth Circuit's recent decision in
Demette v. Falcon Drilling Co.. E. Stewart Spielman. 26 Tulane
Mar L J 683-694 (2002).
Indemnity on the outer continental shelf - a practical primer.
Julia M. Adams, Karen K. Milhollin. 27 Tulane Mar L J 43-107
(2002).
Local management of natural resources: should local governments
be able to keep oil out. Sierra B. Weaver. 26 Harv Envtl L Rev
231-267 (2002).
Mobil Oil Exploration, environmental protection, and contract
repudiation: It's time to recognize the public trust in the Outer
Continental Shelf. Robin Kundis Craig. 30 Envtl L Rep
11104-11121 (2000).
Reserve-based financing of oil and gas interests on the outer
continental shelf. O. Foerster Schully III. 47 Landman 41-56
(Sept/Oct 2002).
OUTER SPACE
Discovery of lunar water: an opportunity to develop a workable
Moon Treaty. Kevin V. Cook. 11 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 647-706
(1999).
PAKISTAN
Iran - Pakistan - India gas pipeline - economy competes with
politics. Anees Jillani, Farhana Khan. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 152-158 (No. 7, 2001).
Revival of the Afghanistan pipeline: a peace dividend. Farhana
Khan. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 1-5 (No. 1, 2002).
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
PERMITS - DREDGE AND FILL
Addition by removal? National Mining limits section 404 control
of construction in wetlands. Michael Hollins. 14 J Land Use &
Envtl L 341-366 (1999).
Repeal of the Tulloch Rule: Is the tide of wetland regulation
receding. J. Richard Cheeks. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L
149-169 (1999-2000).
Revised definition of "discharge of dredged material": its
legality, practicability, and impact on wetlands protection.
William S. Pufko. 9 Envtl Law 187-252 (2002).
PERMITS - ENVIRONMENTAL
Chopping down the birds: logging and the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act. Helen M. Kim. 31 Envtl L 25 (2001).
Decline of the hydropower czar and the rise of agency pluralism
in hydroelectric licensing. Michael C. Blumm, Viki A. Nadol. 26
Colum J Envtl L 81-130 (2001).
Economics of environmental regulation by licensing: an assessment
of recent changes to the wetland permitting process. David
Sunding, David Zilberman. 42 Nat Resources J 59-90 (2002).
Land use, land abuse and land re-use: a framework for the
implementation of TMDLs for nonpoint source polluted waterbodies.
Paula J. Lebowitz. 29 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 97-133 (2002).
Regulation of wetlands: "sidecasting" and "incidental fallback"
under the CWA (Clean Water Act). Lynda J. Oswald. 29 Real Est L
J 246-255 (2001).
PERMITS - WATER
He Kanawai Pono no ka Wai (a just law for water): the application
and implications of the public trust doctrine in In re Water Use
Permit Applications. Keala C. Ede. 29 Ecology L Q 283(32)
(2002).
PIPELINES - NATURAL GAS
District court disagrees on depreciation recovery period for
gathering system. David J. Kautter. 33 Tax Adviser 8(2) (2002).
Gas directive and the implications for offshore pipelines in the
North Sea. Martha M. Roggenkamp. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
120-131 (No. 6, 2001).
Gas directive and third party transport rights - what pipeline
volumes are available. Ketil Boe Moen. 21 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 49-84 (2003).
Iran - Pakistan - India gas pipeline - economy competes with
politics. Anees Jillani, Farhana Khan. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 152-158 (No. 7, 2001).
Iran as a transportation corridor for Azerbaijan's oil to the
international market. Emmanuel Karagiannis. 2001 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 148-151 (No. 7, 2001).
Judicial battles between pipeline companies and landowners: it's
not necessarily who wins, but by how much. Laura A. Hanley. 37
Houston L Rev 125-173 (2000).
Legal and contractual issues relating to interstate gas pipelines
in emerging nations. Blanche Sas. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 70-81 (No. 4, 2002).
Legal principles surrounding the new Canadian and American Arctic
energy debate. Alexander J. Black. 23 Energy L J 81-126 (2002).
Rehabilitation of fully allocated cost: capacity utilization,
pumpability, and rate design on the Trans Alaska Pipeline System
(TAPS). William B. Tye. 67 J Transp L Logistics & Pol'y 109-161
(2000).
Revival of the Afghanistan pipeline: a peace dividend. Farhana
Khan. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 1-5 (No. 1, 2002).
What can we expect from restructuring in natural gas
distribution. Jeffrey J. Leitzinger, Steve Ostrover. 21 Energy L
J 51-77 (2000).
What's in a name...gas gathering or transmission. Rayanne
Griffin Tobey, Maria Mercedes Seidler. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n
Rev 311-326 (No. 11, 1999).
PIPELINES - OIL AND GAS
"Just compensation" or just a windfall? do sales of pipeline
servitudes provide valid, reliable comparables for determination
of just compensation in pipeline expropriation. Gregory Anding,
Robert Dille. 45 Loyola L Rev 381-393 (1999).
Gas directive and third party transport rights - what pipeline
volumes are available. Ketil Boe Moen. 21 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 49-84 (2003).
Hopi Tribe and water: preserving the future. Wayne Taylor, Jr..
56 Nat'l Law Guild Prac 37-41 (1999).
Judicial battles between pipeline companies and landowners: it's
not necessarily who wins, but by how much. Laura A. Hanley. 37
Houston L Rev 125-173 (2000).
Light-handed regulation. Nikol J. Schultz. 37 Alta L Rev 387-418
(1999).
Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002. Susan A. Moore, Theresa
I. Zolet. 24 Energy L J 107-130 (2003).
Precedent emerges in pipeline asset class determination: two
strikes against the IRS. Stephanie F. Watson. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 297-307 (1999).
Report of the oil pipeline regulation committee. . 24 Energy L J
261-292 (2003).
Where to put a pipe - common land use law considerations - or
what is a "lulu" or nimby. Reid C. Wilson. 45 Landman 21-28
(May/June 2000).
POLAND
Petroleum accounting in Poland. Jerzy Gierusz, Alicja Jaruga. 19
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 54-66 (2000).
POLITICS
California watershed movement: science and the politics of place.
Julie Kellner, Michael Vincent McGinnis, John T. Woolley. 42 Nat
Resources J 133-183 (2002).
Changing political landscape of hydropower project relicensing.
Sarah C. Richardson. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 499-531
(2000).
Evolution of the public trust doctrine and the degradation of
trust resources: courts, trustees and political power in
Wisconsin. Melissa Kwaterski Scanlan. 27 Ecology L Q 135 (2000).
Metrics of constitutional amendments and why proposed
environmental quality amendments don't measure up. J.B. Ruhl. 74
Notre Dame L Rev 245-281 (1999).
National incentives to protect natural resources: preserving
their place in international trade. Paul S. Kibel. 29 Envtl L
Rep 10411-10417 (1999).
Policy after politics: How should the new administration approach
public land management in the western states. Cecil D. Andrus,
John C. Freemuth. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-11 (2001).
Politics of wilderness preservation and ecological restoration.
Max Oelschlaeger. 42 Nat Resources J 235-246 (2002).
Role of domestic production in a national energy policy. Juanita
Greenfield, L. Poe Leggette, Nancy L. Pell. 21 Petroleum Acct &
Fin Mgmt J 1-7 (2002).
Separation of powers, the presidency and the environment. Robert
V. Percival. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 25-66 (2001).
Still beyond the hundredth meridian: some thoughts on hope,
progress, and politics. R. McGreggor Cawley. 23 J Land Resources
& Envtl L 1-13 (2003).
U.S. - Mexico borderland water conflicts and institutional
change: a commentary. Vivienne Bennett, Lawrence A. Herzog. 40
Nat Resources J 973-988 (2000).
Visions of western governance: Powell and his successors.
William deBuys. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 15-23 (2003).
Water along the border: an introduction to "water issues in the
U.S. - Mexico borderlands. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J
755-758 (2000).
POOLING, UNITIZATION, AND COMMUNITIZATION
Comparative review of oil and gas law in Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, New Mexico, Mississippi & Louisiana. Tom Daily,
Timothy Dowd, John McDavid, Gregory Nibert, Richard Revels,
George Snell. 47 Landman 33-120 (Nov/Dec 2002).
Maintenance of uniform interest provision: are you at risk.
Dorsey T. Roach. 48 Landman 11-19 (Mar/Apr 2003).
Voluntary pooling in Texas. Patrick J. Murphy. 45 Landman 37-46
(July/Aug 2000).
PORTUGAL
Portuguese natural gas sector and the E.U. gas directive. Diogo
Xavier Da Cunha, Catarina Tavora. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
53-57 (No. 3, 2002).
Portuguese renewable energy market. Tiago Ferreira de Matos. 23
Energy L J 495-504 (2002).
Recent developments in Portuguese energy law. Segismundo Pinto
Basto, Teresa Morais Leitao. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
73-74 (No. 4, 2001).
PREEMPTION
Blaze Construction case: An analysis of the Blaze Construction
tax cases and the implications on avoidance of taxation in Indian
country. James M. Burson. 39 Nat Resources J 845-886 (1999).
PREFERENTIAL PURCHASE RIGHTS
Joint operating agreement: purposes and recent decisions
interpreting its provisions. Terry J. Barker. 45 Landman 13-16
(Sept/Oct 2000).
PROPERTY RIGHTS
Asserting a sovereign servitude to protect habitat of imperiled
species. Mary Christina Wood. 25 Vt L Rev 355-448 (2001).
Biodiversity and the challenge of saving the ordinary. Holly
Doremus. 38 Idaho L Rev 325-354 (2002).
Biodiversity conservation and the intermixed ownership problem:
from nature reserves to collaborative processes. Robert B.
Keiter. 38 Idaho L Rev 301-324 (2002).
Biodiversity in and around McElligot's pool. Scott A. Johnson,
Sandra B. Zellmer. 38 Idaho L Rev 473-504 (2002).
Biodiversity: what are we protecting. J. Michael Scott. 38 Idaho
L Rev 297-299 (2002).
California watershed movement: science and the politics of place.
Julie Kellner, Michael Vincent McGinnis, John T. Woolley. 42 Nat
Resources J 133-183 (2002).
Constitutional law: inverse condemnation: Supreme Court gives
property owners new rights. Brent L. Slipka. 78 ND L Rev 177-200
(2002).
Economic evolution of petroleum property rights in the United
States. Gary D. Libecap, James L. Smith. 31 J Legal Stud NA
(2002).
Extermination and conservation of the American bison. Dean
Lueck. 31 J Legal Stud 609-652 (2002).
From commons to claims: property rights in the California Gold
Rush. Andrea McDowell. 44 Yale J L & Human 1-72 (2002),
reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
Give or take an acre: property norms and the Indian Land
Consolidation Act. Katheleen R. Guzman. 85 Iowa L Rev 595-662
(2000).
How good is an old water right? The application of statutory
forfeiture provisions to pre - code water rights. Keith
Hirokawa, Janet C. Neuman. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 1-28 (2000).
Illusion of perpetuity and the preservation of privately owned
lands. Julia D. Mahoney. 44 Nat Resources J 573-600 (2004).
Joseph Sax and the idea of public trust. Carol M. Rose. Issues
in Legal Scholarship NA (Oct. 8, 2003).
Lake Tahoe's temporary development moratorium: why a stitch in
time should not define the property interest in a takings claim.
Tedra Fox. 28 Ecology L Q 399 (2001).
Legal and economic issues in private land conservation. Roger E.
Meiners, Dominic P. Parker. 44 Nat Resources J 353-360 (2004).
Little fish that roared: the Endangered Species Act, state
groundwater law, and private property rights collide over the
Texas Edwards Aquifer. Todd H. Votteler. 28 Envtl L 845 (1998).
Manifesto for the radical middle. J.B. Ruhl. 38 Idaho L Rev
385-407 (2002).
Marketing biodiversity. James L. Huffman. 38 Idaho L Rev 421-430
(2002).
Overcoming unintended consequences of endangered species
regulation. Michael J. Bean. 38 Idaho L Rev 409-420 (2002).
Practice of endangered species conservation on private lands: one
federal biologist's experiences. Edward D. Koch. 38 Idaho L Rev
505-520.
Property rights and environmental protection: is this land made
for you and me. Joan C. McGregor. 31 Ariz St L J 391-437 (1999).
Property rights and the maintenance of wildlife habitat: the case
for conservation land transactions. Federico Cheever. 38 Idaho L
Rev 431-451 (2002).
Property rights vs. modern technology: finding the right balance
in a world of energy shortages. Warren J. Ludlow. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 14-1(71) (2005).
Property rights vs. modern technology: finding the right balance
in a world of energy shortages. Warren J. Ludlow. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 14-1(71) (2005).
Property rights, the market, and environmental change in 20th
century America. Eric T. Freyfogle. 32 Envtl L Rep 10254-10266
(2002).
Protection of indigenous peoples' rights over land and natural
resources under the Inter-American human rights system. S. James
Anaya, Robert A. Williams, Jr.. 14 Harv Hum Rts J 33-86 (2001).
Providing biodiversity through policy diversity. Barton H.
Thompson, Jr.. 38 Idaho L Rev 355-384 (2002).
Public property rights must prevail. Glen Spain. 19 Envtl F
50(2) (2002).
Reaching regional consensus: examining United States Native
American property rights in light of recent international
developments. Kirsten M. Hetzel. 10 Tulane J Int'l & Comp L
307-331 (2002).
Recognizing and preserving native American treaty usufructs in
the Supreme Court: the Mille Lacs case. Michael R. Newhouse. 21
Pub Land & Resources L Rev 169-200 (2000).
Reconnecting property rights to watersheds. A. Dan Tarlock. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 69-112 (2000).
Reconstitution of property: property as a web of interests.
Craig Anthony Arnold. 26 Harv Envtl L Rev 281-364 (2002).
Retelling allotment: Indian property rights and the myth of
common ownership. Kenneth H. Bobroff. 54 Vand L Rev 1559-1623
(2001).
Role of land trusts in biodiversity conservation on private
lands. Nancy A. McLaughlin. 38 Idaho L Rev 453-472 (2002).
Upper Klamath Lake and the section 106 process: undertakings,
areas of potential effect, and federal responsibility. Kelly
Kritzer. 39 Willamette L Rev 759-778 (2003).
Using property rights to attack environmental protection. Joseph
L. Sax. 19 Pace Envtl L Rev 715-726 (2002).
Water, property, and the Clean Water Act. Janis Snoey. 78 Wash L
Rev 335-366 (2003).
What's a poor land trust to do? Alternatives for dealing with an
opportunistic world. Susan F. French. 44 Nat Resources J 563-572
(2004).
Who owns the earth. Margaret Cronin Fisk. 8 Corp Couns 60
(2001).
PUBLIC LANDS
"Right" to float through private property in Colorado: dispelling
the myth. John R. Hill, Jr.. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 331-350
(2001).
43 CFR 3809 rulemaking and its relationship to the mining law
debate. Debra W. Struhsacker. 48 Landman 41-45 (May/June 2003).
A separate peace?: Utah's R.S. 2477 memorandum of understanding,
disclaimers of interest, and the future of R.S. 2477
rights-of-way in the West. Alison Suthers. 26 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 111-143 (2006).
Accommodating native American cultural activities on federal
public lands. Erik B. Bluemel. 41 Idaho L Rev 475-563 (2005).
Alaska Statehood Act does not guarantee Alaska ninety percent of
the revenue from mineral leases on federal lands in Alaska. Ivan
L. Ascott. 27 Seattle U L Rev 999-1034 (2004).
Arizona monuments: the controversy over President Clinton's new
designations under the Antiquities Act. James Peck. 36 Ariz
Att'y 10(7) (2000).
Back to the present: the Supreme Court refuses to move public
range law backward, but will the BLM move public range management
forward. Joseph M. Feller. 30 Envtl L Rep 10021-10039 (2001).
Bear's Lodge or Devil's Tower: intercultural relations, legal
pluralism, and the management of sacred sites on public lands.
Lloyd Burton, David Ruppert. 8 Cornell J L & Pub Pol'y 201-247
(1999).
Bioprospecting on public lands: should private companies
compensate the government for their use of public land resources.
Sandra Bourgasser-Ketterling. 8 J L & Pol'y 481-541 (2000).
Bird has flown: the uncertain fate of wildlife on closed military
bases. Lloyd Burton, Thomas Williams. 41 Nat Resources J 885-917
(2001).
Bureau of Land Management National Conservation Areas: legitimate
conservation or Satan's spawn. Andy Kerr, Mark Salvo. 20 UCLA J
Envtl L & Pol'y 67(11) (2002).
Bureau of Land Management's proposed surface management
regulations for locatable mineral operations: preventing or
allowing degradation of the public lands. Thomas F. Darin. 35
Land & Water L Rev 309-337 (2000).
Bush Administration's sweetheart settlement policy: a Trojan
horse strategy for advancing commodity production on public
lands. Michael C. Blumm. 34 Envtl L Rep 10397-10420 (2004).
Clash of stories at Chimney Rock: a narrative approach to
cultural conflict over Native American sacred sites on public
land. Howard J. Vogel. 41 Santa Clara L Rev 757-806 (2001).
Clean Water Act section 401: troubled waters for federal lands
permittees. William G. Meyers, III. 41 Advoc (Idaho) 20(5)
(1998).
Comments on land trusts and the choice to conserve land with full
ownership or conservation easements. Bruce Yandle. 44 Nat
Resources J 519-527 (2004).
Community perspective on the monument. Jim Matson. 21 (2B) J
Land Resources & Envtl L 557-560 (2001).
Conflict in the forests, in the waters, and on the ranges of the
West. Anita P. Miller. 32 Urban Law 859-875 (2000).
Conservation easements - preserving privately owned natural
habitats: guidance for interpreting 26 U.S.C. 170(h)(4)(A)(ii),
Glass v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 124 T.C. 258(2005).
Nicholas M. Agopian. 6 Wyo L Rev 447-477 (2006).
Conservation easements: a troubled adolescence. Nancy A.
McLaughlin. 26 J Land Resources & Envtl L 47-61 (2006).
Constructive conquest in the courts: a legal history of the
Western Shoshone lands struggle - 1861 to 1991. John D.
O'Connell. 42 Nat Resources J 765-799 (2002).
Continued cartographic chaos or a new paradigm in public land
reconfiguration? The effect of new laws authorizing limited sales
of public land. Nicholas G. Vaskov. 20 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y
79(29) (2002).
Cooperative conservation: the federalism underpinnings to public
involvement in the management of public lands. Robert D. Comer.
75 U Colo L Rev 1133-1157 (2004).
County collaboration with the BLM on the monument plan and its
roads. Joe Judd. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L 553-556
(2001).
Creating new opportunities for ecosystem restoration on public
lands: An analysis of the potential for Bureau of Land Management
lands. Steven C. Forrest. 23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 21-75
(2002).
Cultural tug of wars: an analysis of the legal issues involving
the NPS proposed rule to allow taking of Golden Eagles at Wupatki
National Monument for religious purposes. Brent Gunson. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 399-433 (2002).
Daybreak on the land: the coming of age of the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976. Roger Flynn. 29 Vt L Rev
815-845 (2005).
Dealing with wilderness. Liz Thomas. 21 (2B) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 593-598 (2001).
Devil's Tower, Rainbow Bridge, and the uphill battle facing
Native American religion on public lands. Charles H. Bonham. 20
L & Ineq: J Theory & Practice 157-202 (2002).
Diamond Bar Cattle Co. v. United States: Holders of state water
rights on federal lands do not also hold property interests to
graze those lands. Mark J. Baas. 4 Great Plains Nat Resources J
296-311 (2000).
Dynamic conservation easements: facing the problem of perpetuity
in land conservation. Duncan M. Greene. 28 Seattle U L Rev
883-923 (2005).
Ecological concepts: legal standards and public land law: an
analysis and assessment. Robert B. Keiter. 44 Nat Resources J
943-988 (2004).
Ensuring the full freedom of religion on public lands: Devils
Tower and the protection of Indian sacred sites. George Linge.
27 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 307-339 (2000).
Environmental justice and natural areas protection. Michael B.
Gerrard. 18 GP Solo & Small Firm Law 52(2) (2001).
Equitably treating individual Washington state forest trusts
through consolidated management: a conceptual approach. B. Bruce
Bare, Bruce R. Lippke, Weihuan Xu. 40 Nat Resources J 479-497
(2000).
Evaluation of the effectiveness of cultural resource laws in
criminal prosecution for theft of archeological and cultural
resources from federal lands. Glenna J. Sheveland. 28 New Eng J
on Crim & Civ Confinement 27-60 (2002).
Executive power and the public lands. Harold H. Bruff. 76 U Colo
L Rev 503-519 (2005).
Federal onshore leases and federal exploratory units simplified.
Robin Forte. 48 Landman 51-56 (Mar/Apr 2003), reprinted in 43 No.
1 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Journal (2006).
Federal ownership and management of America's public lands
through land exchanges. Ryan M. Beaudoin. 4 Great Plains Nat
Resources J 229-260 (2000), reprinted in 38 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2001).
Fragmentation of public domain law and policy: an alternative to
the "shift-to-retention" thesis. Sally K. Fairfax, Leigh
Raymond. 39 Nat Resources J 649-753 (1999).
From Grand Staircase to Grand Canyon parashant: Is there a
monumental future for the BLM. Bruce Babbitt. 3 Denv U Water L
Rev 223-230 (2000).
Future of the Antiquities Act. James R. Rasband. 21 (2B) J Land
Resources & Envtl L 619-634 (2001).
Government managed shrines: protection of Native American sacred
site worship. Shawna Lee. 35 Val U L Rev 265-308 (2000).
Grand Staircase - Escalante national monument embarking on the
new millenium: the Utah experience. Brad T. Barber. 21 (2B) J
Land Resources & Envtl L 561-566 (2001).
Grand Staircase - Escalante national monument: lessons for a
public lands peace process in Utah. Daniel McCool. 21 (2B) J
Land Resources & Envtl L 613-618 (2001).
Grazing our school endowment lands: Idaho Watersheds Project v.
State Board of Land Commissioners. Laura Scales. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 385-411 (2000).
Great experiment that failed? Evaluating the role of a "committee
of scientists" as a tool for managing and protecting our public
lands. Brian Scott Pasko. 32 Envtl L 509(40) (2002).
Growing recreational conflicts on the public lands. Murray D.
Feldman. 44 Advoc 14(3) (March 2001).
He Kanawai Pono no ka Wai (a just law for water): the application
and implications of the public trust doctrine in In re Water Use
Permit Applications. Keala C. Ede. 29 Ecology L Q 283(32)
(2002).
History and future of the conflict over wilderness designations
of BLM land in Utah. Kevin Hayes. 16 J Envtl L & Litig 203-247
(2001).
How did we get here? Looking to history to understand conflicts
in public land governance today. Karin P. Sheldon. 23 Pub Land &
Resources L Rev 1-20 (2002), reprinted in 40 Public Land &
Resources L Dig (2003).
Income tax aspects of conservation easements. C. Timothy
Lindstrom. 5 Wyo L Rev 1-57 (2005).
Is this land your land or is it my land? An overview of state of
Idaho public land ownership and transactions. Kent E. Nelson. 45
Advoc 14-17 (2002).
Judicial safeguards of federalism and the environment: Yucca
Mountain from a constitutional perspective. Jennifer L. Koester,
John C. Yoo. 75 U Colo L Rev 1317-1341 (2004).
Justice Scalia's footprints on the public lands. Bret C.
Birdsong. 83 DU L Rev 259-297 (2005).
Land is itself a sacred, living being: Native American sacred
site protection on federal public lands amidst the shadows of
Bear Lodge. Joel Brady. 24 Am Ind L Rev 153-186 (1999).
Land trusts and the choice to conserve land with full ownership
or conservation easements. Dominic P. Parker. 44 Nat Resources J
483-518 (2004).
Land use, science, and spirituality: the search for a true and
lasting relationship with the land. Charles Wilkinson. 21 Pub
Land & Resources L Rev 1-24 (2000).
Legal underpinnings of the right to float through private
property in Colorado: a reply to John Hill. Kathy Kanda, Steven
Marlin, Lori Potter. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 457-499 (2002).
Limitations on access to public lands and its effect on the
potential supply of natural gas in the United States. . 46
Landman 45-53 (July/Aug 2001).
Limited prospects for privatization of public lands: Presidio and
Valles Caldera may be as good as it gets. James L. Huffman. 44
Nat Resources J 475-482 (2004).
Livestock ranching and traditional culture in northern New
Mexico. Alice McSweeney, Carol Raish. 41 Nat Resources J 713-730
(2001).
Management of grazing: where do we go from here. Chris
Killingsworth, Mark Miller. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L
607-611 (2001).
Managing regulation by multiple levels of government: practical
suggestions. David R. Little, John R. Little, Jr.. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 5-1(14) (2005).
Managing wild horses on public lands: congressional action and
agency response. Kristen H. Glover. 79 NC L Rev 1108-1126
(2001).
Mining claims on federal lands. Robert G. Pruitt, Jr.. 46
Landman 13-19 (Nov/Dec 2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land &
Resources L Dig (2002).
Monument in a changing West. Bill Hedden. 21 (2B) J Land
Resources & Envtl L 535-541 (2001).
Monument, the plan, and beyond. Robert B. Keiter. 21 (2B) J Land
Resources & Envtl L 521-533 (2001).
Move toward participatory democracy in public land management
under NEPA: Is it being thwarted by the ESA. Lorna Jorgensen. 20
J Land Resources & Envtl L 311-333 (2000).
NEPA and oil and gas development on federal lands: a primer for
landmen. A. John Davis, Constance Lundberg. 47 Landman 47-61
(Jan/Feb 2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2002).
New competing uses: balancing recreation with preservation in
Utah's Wasatch mountains. Jay Wilkinson. 24 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 561-585 (2004).
New highways under an old law? R.S. 2477 and its implications for
the future of Utah's federal public lands. Heidi McIntosh. 18
Utah BJ 16(5) (2005).
Ninth Circuit perpetuates the Forest Service's mismanagement of
public range land. Jason Barbeau. 13 Tulane Envtl L J 169-177
(1999).
Ninth Circuit's decision: "discharging" responsibility for water
pollution on federal lands. Christina Marie Frankino. 10 Vill
Envtl L J 431-515 (1999).
Norbeck exception: mining on some public domain lands in the
Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota can be prohibited by
The Department of Agriculture. Jamie C. Thompson, III. 4 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 184-203 (2000).
Other side of the dam story: a review of Coyote Warrior. Stacey
L. Gordon. 26 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 163-171 (2005).
Our sedimentation boxes runneth over: public lands soil law as
the missing link in holistic natural resource protection. Peter
M. Lacy. 31 Envtl L 433 (2001).
Patterns of collaboration in public land issues. Steven Daniels.
21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L 549-551 (2001).
Pegasus, workhorse, or trojan horse? a case study of the use of
the NEPA process in grazing use decisions on Bureau of Land
Management lands in Wyoming. Alan C. Schroeder, Valentine D.
Sworts. 3 Wyo L Rev 3-104 (2003).
Planning the BLM's first national monument. David Williams. 21
(2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L 543-547 (2001).
Policy after politics: How should the new administration approach
public land management in the western states. Cecil D. Andrus,
John C. Freemuth. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-11 (2001).
Preservation paradox: political prestidigitation and an enduring
resource of wildness. Sandra Zellmer. 34 Envtl L 1015(75)
(2004).
Preserving monumental landscapes under the Antiquities Act.
Christine A. Klein. 87 Cornell L Rev 1333(72) (2002).
President Clinton's designation of the Grand Canyon-Parashant
National Monument: using statutory interpretation models to
determine the proper application of the Antiquities Act. Scott
Y. Nishimoto. 17 J Envtl L & Litig 51-96 (2002).
Presidio and Valles Caldera: a preliminary assessment of their
meaning for public resource management. Sally K. Fairfax, Lauren
Gwin, Lynn Huntsinger. 44 Nat Resources J 445-473 (2004).
Private wetlands and public values: "navigable waters" and the
significant nexus test under the Clean Water Act. Carey Schmidt.
26 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 97-120 (2005).
Property clause for the twenty-first century. John D. Leshy. 75
U Colo L Rev 1101-1125 (2004).
Property clause: as if biodiversity mattered. Dale D. Goble. 75
U Colo L Rev 1195-1240 (2004).
Proposal for a Missouri River corridor trust. John E. Thorson.
23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 77-99 (2002).
Protection of cultural resources on public lands: federal
statutes and regulations. Sandra B. Zellmer. 31 Envtl L Rep
10689-10705 (2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2002).
Public lands and waters: who will prevail - man or beast. Anita
P. Miller. 31 Urban Law 883-899 (1999).
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior:
challenging the evolution of public lands grazing regulations.
Shannon Rigsby. 5 Great Plains Nat Resources J 161-176 (2001).
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt: another nail in the coffin for
ranchers' claims to semi-ownership of federal lands. Mark
Epperson. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 147-160 (2001).
Public Lands Council v. Babbitt: Tenth Circuit decides that the
Taylor Grazing Act "breathes discretion at every pore". Alisha
Molyneux. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 132-144 (2000).
Public lands for the public's health. Richard A. Goodman, Marc
L. Miller. 33 Envtl L Rep 10217-10223 (2003).
Public lands litigation in the geography of hope. Sylvia Quasi,
Lois J. Schiffer. 1 Wyo L Rev 413-425 (2001).
Public lands, wilderness, and national security. Roberto Iraola.
109 Penn St L Rev 791-813 (2005).
Public water reserves: The metamorphosis of a public land policy.
James Muhn. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 67-149 (2001).
Re-examining the governing framework of the public lands. Daniel
Kemmis. 75 U Colo L Rev 1127-1132 (2004).
Recreation wars for our natural resources. Jan G. Laitos, Rachel
B. Reiss. 34 Envtl L 1091(32) (2004).
Regulatory minefield: can the Department of Interior say "no" to
hardrock mine. Christine Knight. 73 U Colo L Rev 619-671 (2002).
Relationship between science and democracy: public land policies,
regulation and management. Alex Sienkiewicz, Jack Ward Thomas.
26 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 39-69 (2005).
Report of the environment and public lands committee. . 22 Energy
L J 415-423 (2001).
Responding to hazardous substances released on federal public
lands: civilian agency authority to protect public lands using
CERCLA. Casey Scott Padgett. 7 Envtl Law 1-51 (2000).
Rethinking the perpetual nature of conservation easements. Nancy
A. McLaughlin. 29 Harv Envtl L Rev 421-521 (2005).
Right to say no: federal authority over hardrock mining on public
lands. Roger Flynn, Jeffrey C. Parsons. 16 J Envtl L & Litig
249-329 (2001).
Rise of urban archipelagoes in the American West: a new
reservation policy. James R. Rasband. 31 Envtl L 1 (2001).
Road rage and R.S. 2477: judicial and administrative
responsibility for resolving road claims on public lands. Bret
C. Birdsong. 56 Hastings L J 523-583 (2005).
Role of collaborative groups in federal land and resource
management: a legal analysis. . 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L
67-141 (2003).
Saving the nations's open spaces? A comparative analysis of
recent conservation legislation. Tracy L. Scheidtmann. 7 Envtl
Law 429-450 (2001).
Science on the ground or "dirty science"?. Suzanne Winters. 21
(2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L 599-606 (2001).
Science, judgment, and controversy in natural resource
regulation. Holly Doremus, A. Dan Tarlock. 26 Pub Land &
Resources L Rev 1-37 (2005).
Settling the wilderness. Sarah Krakoff. 75 U Colo L Rev
1159-1193 (2004).
Shaping the modern West: the role of the executive branch. John
D. Leshy. 72 U Colo L Rev 287-310 (2001).
Showdown at the OK Corral - Wyoming's challenge to U.S. supremacy
on federal split estate lands. Matt Micheli. 6 Wyo L Rev 31-51
(2006).
Simplifying the Indian trust responsibility. Rodina Cave. 32
Ariz St L J 1399-1422 (2000).
Still beyond the hundredth meridian: some thoughts on hope,
progress, and politics. R. McGreggor Cawley. 23 J Land Resources
& Envtl L 1-13 (2003).
Supreme Court's SUWA decision: more than another Lujan.
Christina S. Kalavritinos, Paul B. Smyth. 41 Rocky Mt Min L Fdn J
279-295 (No. 2, 2004).
Sustaining geographies of hope: cultural resources on public
lands. Sandra B. Zellmer. 73 U Colo L Rev 413-519 (2002).
Sustaining traditional community values. Louise Liston. 21 (2B)
J Land Resources & Envtl L 585-592 (2001).
Thinking globally, acting locally: cleaning up global aquaculture
through eco-labeling in the United States. Matthew Connolly. 26
Pub Land & Resources L Rev 121-148 (2005).
This land is our land: ranchers seek private rights in the public
rangelands. Jeffrey J. Wechsler. 21 (2A) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 461-487 (2001).
Tourism and recreation. Jean Seiler. 21 (2B) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 581-583 (2001).
Toward a civil discourse: the need in public land management.
Gloria Flora. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 25-34 (2000).
Traditional resource uses and activities: articulating values and
examining conflicts in Alaska. Jennifer L. Tomsen. 19 Alaska L
Rev 167(34) (2002).
Transfer of federal lands: compliance with section 120(h) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act. John F. Seymour. 27 Colum J Envtl L 173-255 (2002).
Transformation on public lands. Thomas A. Carr, Jan G. Laitos.
26 Ecology L Q 140 (May 1999).
Traveling in opposite directions: roadless area management under
the Clinton and Bush administrations. Robert L. Glicksman. 34
Envtl L 1143(66) (2004).
Trust principles as a tool for grazing reform: learning from four
state cases. Sally K. Fairfax, Andrea Issod. 33 Envtl L 341(58)
(2003).
Valid existing rights: legal and practical realities. David L.
Deisley. 44 Landman 17-24 (Nov/Dec 1999), reprinted in 37 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Visions of western governance: Powell and his successors.
William deBuys. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 15-23 (2003).
Western grazing: the capture of grass, ground, and government.
Debra L. Donahue. 35 Envtl L 721(86) (2005).
What does the Grand Staircase - Escalante mean for land
protection in the West? Resource development and ecological
protection. Gary C. Bryner. 21 (2B) J Land Resources & Envtl L
567-580 (2001).
Wilderness Act of 1964: A practitioner's guide. Jared C.
Bennett, Amy Rashkin, Billie Jean Siddoway, Adam Strachan, Ashley
Swallow, James Waddoups, Jeffrey J. Wechsler. 21 J Land Resources
& Envtl L 219-285 (2001).
Wrong war, with the wrong enemy, at the wrong time: the coming
battle over the Military Land Withdrawal Act and an experiment in
privatizing the regulation of public lands. Darrin Hostetler. 29
Envtl L 303 (Summer 1999).
PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE
Candidate in search of an environmental theme: promote the public
trust. Peter Manus. 19 Stan Envtl L J 315-369 (2000).
Custom and public trust: background principles of state property
law. David L. Callies. 30 Envtl L Rep 10003-10023 (2000).
Embryo, not fossil: breathing life into the public trust in
wildlife. Susan Morath Horner. 35 Land & Water L Rev 23-75
(2000).
Evolution of the public trust doctrine and the degradation of
trust resources: courts, trustees and political power in
Wisconsin. Melissa Kwaterski Scanlan. 27 Ecology L Q 135 (2000).
Expanding public trust doctrine: a warning to environmentalists
and policy makers. Geoffrey R. Scott. 10 Fordham Envtl L J 1-70
(1998).
He Kanawai Pono no ka Wai (a just law for water): the application
and implications of the public trust doctrine in In re Water Use
Permit Applications. Keala C. Ede. 29 Ecology L Q 283(32)
(2002).
Legal underpinnings of the right to float through private
property in Colorado: a reply to John Hill. Kathy Kanda, Steven
Marlin, Lori Potter. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 457-499 (2002).
Mobil Oil Exploration, environmental protection, and contract
repudiation: It's time to recognize the public trust in the Outer
Continental Shelf. Robin Kundis Craig. 30 Envtl L Rep
11104-11121 (2000).
Playing reindeer games: Native Alaskans and the federal trust
doctrine. Terese Dillingham. 26 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 649-685
(1999).
Presenting the question of the relevance of the public trust
doctrine to the total regulatory takings analysis. Daniel A.
Nussbaum. 53 SC L Rev 509-525 (2002).
Protecting "the wastes of the foreshore": the federal
navigational servitude and its origins in state public trust
doctrine. Benjamin Longstreth. 102 Colum L Rev 471-500 (2002).
Public property and the democratization of Western water law: a
modern view of the public trust doctrine. Michael C. Blumm.
Issues in Leg Scholarship NA (Oct 8, 2003).
Public trust and distrust: the theoretical implications of the
public trust doctrine for natural resource management. Erin
Ryan. 31 Envtl L 477 (2001).
Public trust argument for public access to private conservation
land. Sarah C. Smith. 52 Duke L J 629(22) (2002).
Public Trust Doctrine and groundwater rights. Erik Swenson. 53
Univ Miami L Rev 363-391 (1999).
Public trust: a fundamental doctrine of American property law.
Harrison C. Dunning. Issues in Leg Scholarship NA (Oct 8, 2003).
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court: Rejecting legislative
favoritism in water right allocations. Sean E. O'Day. 4 Denv U
Water L Rev 29-75 (2000).
Trust doctrine and the Clean Water Act: the Environmental
Protection Agency's duty to enforce tribal water quality
standards against upstream polluters. Kevin H. Kono. 80 Or L Rev
677-716 (2001).
Trust for all the people: rethinking the management of
Washington's state forests. Daniel Jack Chasan. 24 Seattle U L
Rev 1-48 (2000).
Underpinnings of the public trust doctrine: lessons from Illinois
Central Railroad. Douglas L. Grant. 33 Ariz St L J 847-885
(2001).
Variation on a theme: expanding the public trust doctrine to
include protection of wildlife. Gary Meyers. Issues in Legal
Scholarship NA (Oct 8 2003).
Who owns the sky? Clean air as a public trust. Gerald Torres. 19
Pace Envtl L Rev 515-574 (2002).
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENTS
Proper reporting of income earned between effective date and
closing date of purchase agreement. Vance C. Bryson. 21
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 110-119 (2002).
Selected issues in purchase and sale agreements for oil and gas
properties. Arthur J. Wright. 48 Landman 25-40 (Jan/Feb 2003),
reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
All mixed up about mixed waste. Rebecca Leonard. 32 Envtl L
219(19) (2002).
Nuclear arms control: the environmental dimension. Jason B.
Aamodt, Lakshman D. Guruswamy. 10 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y
267-318 (1999).
Radioactive waste and Russia's northern fleet: sinking the
principles of international environmental law. Justin Mellor. 28
Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 51-72 (1999).
Subseabed disposal of nuclear waste: an international policy
perspective. Christopher Meisenkothen. 14 Conn J Int'l L 631-658
(1999).
TRU cooperative regulatory federalism: radioactive waste
transportation safety in the west. Bernard P. Haggerty. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 41-72 (2002).
RAILROADS
Cleaning up at the tracks: Superfund meets rails-to-trails.
Clifford J. Villa. 25 Harv Envtl L Rev 481-534 (2001).
Cowcatchers, salt crystals, and pork barrels: marshaling a case
to legally derail the Union Pacific Causeway. Lance Duncan
Fitzjarrald. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 291-310 (2000).
Pipes, wires, and bicycles: rails-to-trails, utility licenses,
and the shifting scope of railroad easements from the nineteenth
to the twenty-first centuries. Jeffrey M. Hester, Danaya C.
Wright. 27 Ecology L Q 351-465 (2000).
Underpinnings of the public trust doctrine: lessons from Illinois
Central Railroad. Douglas L. Grant. 33 Ariz St L J 847-885
(2001).
REAL ESTATE
Origin and development of the rectangular survey system.
Flynn. 45 Landman 47-55 (July/Aug 2000).
Michael
RECLAMATION
Accounting for site closure and environmental costs: a new maze
of standards and requirements. Charlotte J. Wright. 48 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 481-494 (2000).
Justice for the earth in the twenty-first century - restoring the
natural landscape of the American West. Debra L. Donahue. 1 Wyo
L Rev 373-401 (2001).
RECLAMATION - MINING
Mine is a terrible thing to waste: past, present and future
reclamation efforts to correct the environmentally damaging
effects of coal mines. A. Brooke Rubenstein, David Winkowski. 13
Vill Envtl L J 189-215 (2002).
Mining and solid waste reclamation and closing costs. Spence
Wise. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 47-55 (2001).
Reclamation site and seedbed preparation for Nevada hard rock
mines. Gary A. Acordagoitia, J. Kent McAdoo. 45 Landman 35-40
(Nov/Dec 2000).
Unnecessarily hesitant good Samaritans: conducting voluntary
cleanups of inactive and abandoned mines without incurring
liability. Sean T. McAllister. 33 Envtl L Rep 10245-10264
(2003), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2003).
RECLAMATION - WATER PROJECTS
Allocating responsibility for groundwater remediation costs.
Dominique Cartron, Michael A. Francis, Barbara J. Graves, David
Jordan, Daniel B. Stephens. 23 Trial Law 159-171 (2000).
Political and legal analysis of the rise and fall of western dams
and reclamation projects. Chris Bromley. 5 Denv U Water L Rev
204-224 (2001).
RECREATION
Tourism and recreation. Jean Seiler. 21 (2B) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 581-583 (2001).
RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL
Rights of first refusal in oil and gas transactions: a
progressive analysis. Clifford D. Johnson, David J. Stanford. 37
Alta L Rev 316-351 (1999).
RIGHTS-OF-WAY
R.S. 2477 rights-of-way: the controversy continues. Randall E.
Hubbard. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 10-1(23) (2005).
Rights of way on Native American lands. Mark Murray. 49 Landman
27-30 (Sept/Oct 2004).
RISK ALLOCATION
Avoiding liability for human rights violations in project
finance. Eric Marcks. 22 Energy L J 301-333 (2001).
Return to certainty in risk assessment, management and transfer:
The journey of the Texas Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act. Thomas R.
Fox. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 18-27 (No. 1, 2001).
ROADLESS AREA REVIEW AND EVALUATION
Roadless area conservation goal: a year of trials for the stalled
regulation. Christine M. Ensley. 8 Envtl Law 639-661 (2002).
Roadless area conservation: how the "roadless rule" affects
America's forestland. Alison S. Hoyt. 14 Tul Envtl L J 525-547
(2001).
ROYALTIES
Comparative review of oil and gas law in Texas, Oklahoma,
Arkansas, New Mexico, Mississippi & Louisiana. Tom Daily,
Timothy Dowd, John McDavid, Gregory Nibert, Richard Revels,
George Snell. 47 Landman 33-120 (Nov/Dec 2002).
ROYALTIES - INDIAN LANDS
Developing the mineral res on the "rez" the new Indian gas
royalty regulations: is it still a matter of trust. James E.
Glaze. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 36-69 (2003).
ROYALTIES - MINERALS
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
Subleases, overriding royalty interests and reversionary rights.
R. Thomas Jorden, Jr., Margaret D. Swords. 46 Landman 9-16
(May/June 2001).
Using the web to determine the reasonableness of payments to
royalty owners and non-operators. Christopher K. Alguire,
Jonathan E. Ellis. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 18-35 (2003).
ROYALTIES - NATURAL GAS
Economic exchange as the requisite basis for royalty ownership of
value added in natural-gas sales. John Bratland. 41 Nat
Resources J 685-711 (2001).
Natural gas royalties - lessor vs. lessee and the implied
covenant to market. Jeff King. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
17-29 (2000).
Natural gas royalties: lessor vs. lessee and the implied covenant
to market. Jeff King. 63 Tex BJ 854(6) (Oct 2000).
Recent judicial and legislative developments affecting
measurement and payment of royalties on private leases.
Jacqueline Lang Weaver. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 38-71
(2002).
Rogers v. Westerman: "At the well" just ain't what it used to be.
Darin B. Scheer. 47 Landman 53-64 (Mar/Apr 2002).
Royalty clauses in gas leases: what can lessors deduct now.
Lindsey Warren. 20 Preventive L Rep 23-28 (2002).
ROYALTIES - OIL AND GAS
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Discussion of McMahon Foundation vs. Amerada Hess - the oil
antitrust litigation. Ronald O. Holman. 45 Landman 43-47
(Sept/Oct 2000).
Duties of the operator to royalty owners. J. Robert Beatty. 20
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 43-59 (2001).
Interpreting mineral and royalty deeds: the legacy of the
one-eighth royalty and other stories. Laura H. Burney. 33 St
Mary's L J 1-55 (2001).
Marketing affiliates: differences in royalty valuation analysis
under MMS regulations and state case law. Norma Rosner Iacovo.
20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 35-89 (2001).
Mutual benefit implied covenant for oil and gas royalty owners.
John Burritt McArthur. 41 Nat Resources J 795-883 (2001).
Plaintiff's perspective: class actions in royalty cases. James
L. Reed, Jr.. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 47-62 (2001),
reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Preservation of overriding royalties - now you see them, now you
don't. John R. Woodward. 45 Landman 51-62 (Sept/Oct 2000).
Royalty valuation: should overriding royalty interests and
nonparticipating royalty interests, whether payable in value or
in kind, be subject to same valuation standard as lease royalty.
Owen L. Anderson. 35 Land & Water L Rev 1-21 (2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
U.S. transfer pricing and oil royalties: a cautionary tale.
Henry M. Banta, Lee Ellen Helfrich, JeanAne M. Jiles, Martin
Lobel. 19 Tax Notes Int'l 177-189 (1999).
RULE OF CAPTURE
Ownership of transmigratory minerals, Utah and zebras: proof that
oil and gas ownership law needs reform. Jared C. Bennett. 21
(2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 349-396 (2001).
Rule of Capture in Texas: an outdated principle beyond its time.
Eric Opiela. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 87-115 (2002).
Texas v. ExxonMobil: a bounty hunter's dream or has the state
grabbed a tiger by its tail. Bill Patterson. 46 Landman 54-57
(2001).
Voluntary pooling in Texas. Patrick J. Murphy. 45 Landman 37-46
(July/Aug 2000).
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Azerbaijan oil and gas legislation. Zaur Baghirov. 2000 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 282-285 (No. 11, 12 2000).
Environmental protection in Kazakhstan: the new oil legislation.
Yuliya Mitrofanskaya. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 76-88 (Fall
1999).
Evicting people from nature: indigenous land rights and national
parks in Australia, Russia, and the United States. David
Ostergren, Robert Poirier. 42 Nat Resources J 331-351 (2002).
Foreign investment in Russia's oil and gas: a framework and
lessons for the future. Arina Shulga. 22 U Pa J Int'l Econ L
1067-1103 (2001).
Interrelations between the state and large businesses in Russia.
Valery A. Kryukov. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 349-357 (No. 12,
1999).
Iran as a transportation corridor for Azerbaijan's oil to the
international market. Emmanuel Karagiannis. 2001 Int'l Energy L
& Tax'n Rev 148-151 (No. 7, 2001).
Iranian interests in the Caspian Sea region. H. Ghanimi Fard.
2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 162-169 (No. 7, 2001).
Julietta gold mining project: lessons for project finance in
emerging markets. Ian R. Coles. 24 Fordham Int'l L J 1052-1063
(2001).
Kashagan and Tengiz - Castor and Pollux. Daniel Johnston. 20
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 95-119 (2001).
Kazakhstan's amended legal regime for natural resource
development: the key changes. Yuri G. Basin, Olga I. Chentsova,
Jonathan H. Hines. 2 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 52-65 (February
2000).
Kazakhstan's amended legal regime for natural resource
development: the key changes. Yuri G. Basin, Olga I. Chentsova,
Jonathan H. Hines. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 52-65 (No. 2,
2000).
Legal regime for hydrocarbon development in Uzbekistan. Jonathan
H Hines, Eric A Sievers. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 387-402
(2001).
New amendments to Russia's underground resources law. Jonathan
H. Hines, Dmitri V. Nikiforov. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L
195-201 (2000).
Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. Kamyar
Mehdiyoun. 94 Am J Int'l L 179-189 (2000).
Petroleum legislation and incentives in Russia and the former
Soviet Union. Gordon Barrows. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
31-36 (No. 2, 2002).
Pipeline development: a stabilising or destabilising factor in
Nagorno-Karabakh. Emmanuel Karagiannis. 2001 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 102-105 (No. 5, 2001).
Production sharing agreements in Russia. Dean Rolfe. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 280-284 (No. 9/10, 1999).
Radioactive waste and Russia's northern fleet: sinking the
principles of international environmental law. Justin Mellor. 28
Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 51-72 (1999).
Recent amendments to the legislation on production sharing
agreements in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan. Sergei Diyachenko,
Robert Worrall. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 137-143 (No. 6,
2000).
Regulation of energy prices in the Czech Republic. Iva
Martinkova. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 199-200 (No. 8,
2002).
Turkmenistan's oil and gas sector: Overview of the legal regime
for foreign invesment. Jonathan H. Hines, James B. Varanese.
2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 1-10 (No. 1, 2001).
Turkmenistan's oil and gas sector: overview of the legal regime
for foreign investment. Jonathan H Hines, James B Varanese. 19 J
Energy & Nat Resources L 44-63 (2001).
SCHOOL LANDS
Condemnation without compensation: How environmental eminent
domain diminishes the value of Montana's school trust lands.
Michael J. Mortimer. 8 Dickinson J Envtl L & Pol'y 243-271
(1999).
Grazing our school endowment lands: Idaho Watersheds Project v.
State Board of Land Commissioners. Laura Scales. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 385-411 (2000).
Plan of action: A new alternative to traditional school trust
land exchanges in the West. Holly Chamberlain. 23 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 241-268 (2003).
School trust lands: the land manager's dilemma between
educational funding and environmental conservation, a Hobson's
choice. Sean E. O'Day. 8 NYU Envtl L J 163-235 (1999).
SEABED MINING
Reconciling natural law and legal positivism in the deep seabed
mining provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Arcangelo Travaglini. 15 Temple Int'l & Comp L J 313-334 (2001).
So your client wants to engage in deep seabed mining. Houston
Putnam Lowry. 5 ILSA J Int'l & Comp L 325-329 (1999).
SECONDARY RECOVERY OF OIL
Prospecting for oil at the court house: recovery for drainage
caused by secondary recovery operations. Ana Boswell Stephens.
50 Ala L Rev 603-622 (1999).
SECURITY INTERESTS
Legal aspects of creating security interests over mining titles
in the states parties to OHBLA. Thierry M Lauriol. 19 J Energy &
Nat Resources L 201-219 (2001).
SEISMIC DATA
Bright spots: what do they mean.
(2001).
Sandi Barber. 46 Landman 33-36
Seismic access issues. Christopher B. Manderville, Allan D.
Nielsen. 40 Alta L Rev 1-18 (2002).
SEVERED MINERALS
Literature review of severed minerals, split estates, rights of
access, and surface use in mineral extraction operations. Jan G.
Laitos. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 1B-1(7) (2005).
Severed minerals: restrictive covenants as restrictions on
surface use by the mineral owner. Susan Hlywa Topp. Severed
Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in
Mineral Extraction Operations 9B-1(8) (2005).
Split estates under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
Stephen F. Sorensen. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of
Access, & Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 6A-1(17)
(2005).
SINGAPORE
Liberalisatin of the gas and electricity industries in Singapore.
Arman Galledari. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 250-254 (No.
10, 2002).
Singapore issues regulation on bond market, oil-trading tax
incentives. Linda L. Ng. 22 Tax Notes Int'l 2671-2673 (2001).
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
All mixed up about mixed waste. Rebecca Leonard. 32 Envtl L
219(19) (2002).
Business dilemma: 21st century natural resource damage
liabilities for 20th century industrial progress. Stacy Lynn
Bettison, E. Lynn Grayson, Christine Picker, Steven M. Siros. 31
Envtl L Rep 11356-11379 (2001).
Closing the book on CERCLA section 107 "joint and several" claims
by liable private parties. Shane Swindle, Karl Tilleman. 18 Va
Envtl L J 159-182 (1999).
Colorado district court strengthens EPA's enforcement ability for
hazardous waste violations. Kristi Hughes. 29 Ecology L Q 431(5)
(2002).
Federalism and environmental regulation: a public choice
analysis. Richard L. Revesz. 115 Harv L Rev 553-641 (2001).
High level nuclear waste on Indian reservations: pushing the
tribal sovereignty envelope to the edge. Alex Tallchief Skibine.
21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 287-316 (2001).
Mining and solid waste reclamation and closing costs. Spence
Wise. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 47-55 (2001).
Mountaintop mining and U.S. EPA's proposed rule change: a giant
step backward for the Clean Water Act. Daniel L. Rosenberg. 30
Envtl L Rep 11175-11180 (2000).
Recent developments in mountaintop removal mining: West Virginia
rivers are not the coal industry's private dump. Benjamin
Diamond. 6 Envtl Law 891-912 (2000).
Regulation by the bootstrap: contingent management of hazardous
wastes under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Jeffrey
M. Gaba. 18 Yale J on Reg 85-127 (2001).
Responding to hazardous substances released on federal public
lands: civilian agency authority to protect public lands using
CERCLA. Casey Scott Padgett. 7 Envtl Law 1-51 (2000).
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers: isolated waters, migratory birds, statutory and
constitutional interpretation. Edward A. Fitzgerald. 43 Nat
Resources J 11-76 (2003).
Subseabed disposal of nuclear waste: an international policy
perspective. Christopher Meisenkothen. 14 Conn J Int'l L 631-658
(1999).
Terra firma of terra incognita? Western land use, hazardous
waste, and the devolution of U.S. federal environmental programs.
Kris Wernstedt. 40 Nat Resources J 157-183 (2000).
TRU cooperative regulatory federalism: radioactive waste
transportation safety in the west. Bernard P. Haggerty. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 41-72 (2002).
Uranium mining: use and disposal law in Australia: the case for a
cradle-to-grave philosophy. Chris McGrath. 17 Envtl & Plan L J
502 (2000).
Who owns the earth. Margaret Cronin Fisk. 8 Corp Couns 60
(2001).
SOUTH AFRICA
Legal regime for use and protection of international watercourses
in the Southern African region: evolution and context. Salman
M.A. Salman. 41 Nat Resources J 981-1022 (2001).
South Africa's new democratic water legislation: national
government's role as public trustee in dam building and
management activities. Robyn Stein. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources
L 284-295 (2000).
South Africa's proposed mining royalty regime - a critique.
Marius van Blerck. 39 Tax Notes Int'l 45-48 (2003).
South Africa's water and dam safety legislation: a commentary and
analysis on the impact of the World Commission on Dam's Report,
Dams and Development. Robyn Stein. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1573-1590
(2001).
South Africa: electricity and gas. Kurt Pakendorf. 2000 Int'l
Energy L & Tax'n Rev 202-206 (No. 8, 2000).
South and central Africa: a review of petroleum legislation and
incentives. Gordon H. Barrows. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
47-52 (No. 3, 2001).
Sweet fruits of victory: the South African 2001 budget and the
South African economy and energy related issues. Peter Slack.
2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 143-147 (No. 7, 2001).
Tax bill targets South Africa's mining sector. Marius van
Blerck. 29 Tax Notes Int'l 1200-1202 (2003).
Transboundary energy security: emerging legal and institutional
framework for electricity trading in Southern Africa. Kishor
Uprety. 20 J Energy & Nat Resources L 379-401 (2002).
SPAIN
Financial accounting and reporting in extractive industries:
evidence from Spanish oil companies. Bernabe Escobar, Manuel
Garcia-Ayuso, Jose Angel Perez. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
1-11 (2000).
Mine disaster threatens Spain's Donana National Park. Jerrold
Long. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 310-322 (1998).
Network access in Spain. Luis Pastor Ridruejo. 2000 Int'l Energy
L & Tax'n Rev 120-125 (No. 5, 2000).
Spanish law of waters in the United States: from Alfronso the
Wise to the present day. Eric B. Kunkel. 32 McGeorge L Rev
341-384 (2001).
Water use and cultural conflict in 19th century northwestern new
Spain and Mexico. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J 759-781
(2000).
STATE LANDS
Managing state trust lands for ecosystem health: the case of
Washington State's range and agricultural lands. Gregory A.
Hicks. 6 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 1-28 (1999).
STATUTES OF LIMITATION
Current issues involving the statute of limitations. Ernest E.
Smith. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 25-46 (2001).
STRIP MINING
Bragg v. W. Va. Coal Ass'n and the unfortunate limitation of
citizen suits against the state in cooperative federalism
regimes. Margo Hasselman. 29 Ecology L Q 205(25) (2002).
SUBMERGED LANDS
Joint development of common offshore oil and gas deposits: "mere"
state practice or customary international law. David M. Ong. 93
Am J Int'l L 771-804 (1999).
Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. Kamyar
Mehdiyoun. 94 Am J Int'l L 179-189 (2000).
Subseabed disposal of nuclear waste: an international policy
perspective. Christopher Meisenkothen. 14 Conn J Int'l L 631-658
(1999).
Supreme Court's analysis in Idaho v. Couer d'Alene tribe of Idaho
: is the Young exception to the Eleventh Amendment inapplicable
to Indian tribe claims. Randy L. Meyer. 30 Univ Toledo L Rev
131-158 (1998).
SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1986
Cleaning up at the tracks: Superfund meets rails-to-trails.
Clifford J. Villa. 25 Harv Envtl L Rev 481-534 (2001).
SUPPLY CONTRACTS
Criteria for the determination of abuse of dominant positions in
network distribution of gas and electricity. Kurt Markert. 2002
Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 21-24 (No. 2, 2002).
SURFACE ESTATES
Coal versus gas: Who gets the mine, and who gets the shaft.
Peter A. Bjork, Steven E. Marlin. 46 Landman 55-69 (March/April
2001).
Deluge: Potential solutions to emerging conflicts regarding onlease and off-lease surface damage caused by coal bed methane
production. M. Kristeen Hand, Kyle R. Smith. 1 Wyo L Rev 661-693
(2001).
Surface mining and the continuing battle between surface and
subsurface property owners: A look at South Dakota Mining
Association v. Lawrence County. Kevin J. Smith. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 1-19 (1999-2000).
Tension beneath the surface: the evolving relationship between
surface and mineral estates. Robert E. Witwer. 30 Colo Law 67(2)
(2001).
SURFACE MINING
43 CFR 3809 rulemaking and its relationship to the mining law
debate. Debra W. Struhsacker. 48 Landman 41-45 (May/June 2003).
Bureau of Land Management's proposed surface management
regulations for locatable mineral operations: preventing or
allowing degradation of the public lands. Thomas F. Darin. 35
Land & Water L Rev 309-337 (2000).
Exhaustion Doctrine should not be a doctrine with exceptions.
Rebecca L. Donnellan. 103 W Va L Rev 361-386 (2001).
Recent developments in surface mining: an examination of Black
Mountain and Bragg v. Robertson. Mickey Webster. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 267-300 (2000-01).
Surface mining and the continuing battle between surface and
subsurface property owners: A look at South Dakota Mining
Association v. Lawrence County. Kevin J. Smith. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 1-19 (1999-2000).
SURFACE RIGHTS
Supreme Court reviews mineral and gas conveyances to surface
patentees and Southern Ute Indian Tribe. Becki J. Lesser. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 125-131 (2000).
SURFACE USE
Developments in nonregulatory oil and gas law. Ernest E. Smith.
45 Landman 47-58 (Nov/Dec 2000).
Legal framework for analyzing multiple surface use issues. Bruce
M. Kramer. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, &
Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 2-1(57) (2005).
Negotiating a surface use agreement for private lands. David
Patton. Dev Issues & Conflicts in Modern Gas & Oil Plays 10-1(50)
(2004).
Oil and gas title searches and notice under the Surface
Development Notification Act. Richard H. Bate. 31 Colo Law
113-119 (Oct 2002).
Surface use agreements. Christopher G. Hayes. Severed Minerals,
Split Estates, Rights of Access, & Surface Use in Mineral
Extraction Operations 15-1(8) (2005).
Surface use by mineral owner: how much accommodation is required
under current oil and gas law. Christopher M. Alspach. 55 Okla L
Rev 89-119 (2002), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2003).
SURFACE USE & SEVERED MINERALS
Split-estate: communication and education versus legislation.
Drake D. Hill, P.Jaye Rippley. 4 Wyo L Rev 585-605 (2004).
SURFACE USE & SPLIT ESTATES
Journey through mineral estate dominance, the Accomodation
Doctrine, and beyond: why Texas is ready to take the next step
with a Surface Damage Act. Andrew M. Miller. 40 Houston L Rev
461-497 (2003).
Split estates under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
Stephen F. Sorensen. Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of
Access, & Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations 6A-1(17)
(2005).
TAKE-OR-PAY
Fairness is in the eye of the beholder: the conflicting
interpretations of the correct measure of damages for breach of
natural gas contracts containing take-or-pay provisions. Rodrick
J. Coffey. 14 BYU J Pub L 151-171 (1999).
Force majeure and take or pay contracts for power stations: the
buyer's perspective. Guy Hardaker. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n
Rev 163-166 (No. 7, 2000).
Oil and gas: lessor's distant beacon of hope - will Oklahoma see
it. Stephen Joseph Capron. 52 Okla L Rev 145-161 (1999).
TAKING IN KIND
Royalty valuation: should overriding royalty interests and
nonparticipating royalty interests, whether payable in value or
in kind, be subject to same valuation standard as lease royalty.
Owen L. Anderson. 35 Land & Water L Rev 1-21 (2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
TAKINGS CLAUSE
"Just compensation" or just a windfall? do sales of pipeline
servitudes provide valid, reliable comparables for determination
of just compensation in pipeline expropriation. Gregory Anding,
Robert Dille. 45 Loyola L Rev 381-393 (1999).
Annual survey of land use literature. Stuart L. Deutsch, A. Dan
Tarlock. 23 Zoning & Plan L Rep 49-63 (2000).
Basic themes for regulatory takings litigation. J. Peter Byrne.
29 Envtl L 811 (1999).
Braving the waters of Supreme Court takings jurisprudence: will
the Fifth Amendment protect western water rights from federal
environmental regulation. Marcus J. Lock. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
76-110 (2000).
Candidate in search of an environmental theme: promote the public
trust. Peter Manus. 19 Stan Envtl L J 315-369 (2000).
Constitutional and takings developments with respect to wetlands
and endangered species legislation. Edgar B. Washburn. 2001 Inst
Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain 12-2(26) (2001).
Federal government must pay for water to protect species under
the Endangered Species Act. Deborah Curran. 29 Ecology L Q
421(6) (2002).
Give or take an acre: property norms and the Indian Land
Consolidation Act. Katheleen R. Guzman. 85 Iowa L Rev 595-662
(2000).
Inverse condemnation in Idaho. Andrew Wright, Edward F. Wroe. 45
Advoc 22-24 (2002).
Lake Tahoe's temporary development moratorium: why a stitch in
time should not define the property interest in a takings claim.
Tedra Fox. 28 Ecology L Q 399 (2001).
Little fish that roared: the Endangered Species Act, state
groundwater law, and private property rights collide over the
Texas Edwards Aquifer. Todd H. Votteler. 28 Envtl L 845 (1998).
Of farmers' takes and fishes' takings: Fifth Amendment
compensation claims when the Endangered Species Act and western
water rights collide. Cori S. Parobek. 27 Harv Envtl L Rev
177-225 (2003), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2003).
Partial takings claim, ownership rights in land and urban
planning practice: the emerging dichotomy between uncompensated
regulation and compensable benefit extraction under the Fifth.
Edward H. Ziegler. 22 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-18 (2002).
Pondering Palazzolo: why do we continue to ask the wrong
questions. Michael Allan Wolf. 32 Envtl L Rep 10367-10374
(2002).
Regulatory takings, methodically. Eric T. Freyfogle. 31 Envtl L
Rep 10313-10321 (2001).
Regulatory takings: a historical overview and legal analysis for
natural resource management. Susan M. Stedfast. 29 Envtl L 881
(1999).
Ripeness doctrine in regulatory takings litigation. Gordon C.
Strachan, Adam Strachan. 22 J Land Resources & Envtl L 19-40
(2002).
Shaken, not stirred: has Tahoe-Sierra settled or muddied the
regulatory takings waters. Nissa Laughner, Danaya C. Wright. 32
Envtl L Rep 11177-11189 (2002).
Temporary insanity: the long tale of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation
Council and its quiet ending in the United States Supreme Court.
J. David Breemer. 71 Fordham L Rev 1-55 (2002).
Tree preservation ordinances: sacrificing private timber rights
on the diminutive altar of public benefit. Brian E. Daughdrill,
Kathryn M. Zickert. 52 Mercer L Rev 705-729 (2001).
Turning of the tide: the Tahoe-Sierra regulatory takings
decision. John D. Echeverria. 32 Envtl L Rep 11235-11252 (2002).
Underpinnings of the public trust doctrine: lessons from Illinois
Central Railroad. Douglas L. Grant. 33 Ariz St L J 847-885
(2001).
Valuation of minerals in takings cases. Rebekah King. 42 Nat
Resources J 185-210 (2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2002).
Water, property, and the Clean Water Act. Janis Snoey. 78 Wash L
Rev 335-366 (2003).
TAX EQUITY AND FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1982
Current developments in production sharing contracts and
international concerns: retrospective government take - not a
perfect statistic. Daniel Johnston. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt
J 101-108 (2002).
TAXATION - COAL
Tax incentive credits: do they work. Stephen Jakubowski, Gary
Saunders. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 661-669 (2000).
TAXATION - DEPLETION
Elimination of depletion deduction for fossil fuels. Wendy B.
Davis. 26 Seattle U L Rev 197-211 (2002).
What depletion methods of natural resources for income tax
purposes are most prevalent throughout the world. Sarah
Bloesser, Jack R. Fay. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 567-582 (2003).
TAXATION - FOREIGN
Environmental taxation: The U.K.'s proposed climate change levy.
Sidney A. Price. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 335-341 (No. 12,
1999).
TAXATION - INDIAN LANDS
American Indian law - tribal lands - an Indian tribe that holds
title to land by transfer under ANCSA may not impose business tax
when its land is not Indian Country within statutory definition.
Stacy Belisle. 76 U Det Mercy L Rev 903-926 (1999).
Blaze Construction case: An analysis of the Blaze Construction
tax cases and the implications on avoidance of taxation in Indian
country. James M. Burson. 39 Nat Resources J 845-886 (1999).
Marking the path post-Cotton: the Supreme Court reaffirms dual
taxation in Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians. Heather G.
Pennington. 14 J Nat Resources & Envtl L 271-287 (1998-99).
Road less traveled - implications of the Goodman Oil decision.
Karen L. Spinola. 38 Idaho L Rev 637-666 (2002).
Road less traveled: the implications of the Goodman Oil decision.
Julie Kane. 44 Advoc (Idaho) 19(4) (2001).
Tax stategies for maximizing depreciation, including deductions
for Indian reservation property - 2001 and beyond. Robert D.
Pulliam. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 91-100 (2002).
TAXATION - MINERALS
Current tax policy issues in the optimum development of minerals
resources sector in select countries of Eurasia. Daniel A. Witt.
21 Tax Notes Int'l 1349-1370 (2000).
TAXATION - MINING
Mining activities are ruled to be a for-profit activity: a
primer. D. Larry Crumbley, Rebekah Sheely. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q
783-793 (2002).
Minnesota taconite production tax: an alternative index. Dena
Draskovich, Howard Haas, Peter Kakela. 16 J Nat Resources & Envtl
L 43-58 (2001-02).
Taxes and nonrenewable resources: the impact on exploration and
development. Jeff Strand. 55 SMU L Rev 1683-1752 (2002).
TAXATION - NATURAL GAS
Current status of depreciation of pipeline gathering systems.
Patrick Hennessee. 80 Taxes: Tax Mag 49(5) (2002).
District court disagrees on depreciation recovery period for
gathering system. David J. Kautter. 33 Tax Adviser 8(2) (2002).
General Motors Corporation v. Tracy. C. Adam Buck. 20 Energy L J
345-356 (1999).
TAXATION - NATURAL RESOURCES
Evidence on the effectiveness of using tax credits to promote
energy conservation. Michael R. Kinney, Kathryn A.S. Lancaster,
Jack Robison. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 339-367 (2001).
Host of tax initiatives await uncertain energy legislation.
Patti Mohr. 91 Tax Notes 1946-1949 (2001).
House taxwriters - treasury discuss land conservation tax
incentives. Patti Mohr, Warren Rojas. 95 Tax Notes 812-814
(2002).
Natural resources. . 52 Tax Law 1125-1131 (1999).
Natural resources, tax, and other miscellaneous areas. Charles
C. Bailey. 62 Tex B J 788(5) (Sept. 1999).
New rev rul says "timmm-berr" to built-in gains tax for natural
resource companies. Greg W. Smith, Horacio Sobol. 96 J Tax'n
46(6) (2002).
What depletion methods of natural resources for income tax
purposes are most prevalent throughout the world. Sarah
Bloesser, Jack R. Fay. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 567-582 (2003).
TAXATION - OIL AND GAS
Average cost method a permissible inventory method for federal
income tax purposes in the oil and gas industry. Larry Walter,
Bill Wilson. 22 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 70-83 (2003).
Cancellation of indebtedness rules for pass - through entities:
new decisions, challenges, and opportunities. Gregory A. Carnes,
Giles Sutton. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 445-458 (2000).
Critical review of Georgian oil and gas tax legislation.
Delphine Nougayrede. 23 Tax Notes Int'l 1225-1230 (2001).
Federal income tax incentives for the oil and gas industry 19912000. H. Wayne Cecil. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 757-762 (2003).
Geological and geophysical costs: a disincentive legacy for the
oil and gas industry. Wray E. Bradley, Patrick A. Hennessee. 49
Oil Gas & Energy Q 767-782 (2001).
How do countries throughout the world compare in regards to the
types of inventory valuation methods accepted for tax purposes.
Jack R. Fay. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 355-369 (2002).
Needed: tax relief for independent producers. Linda M. Nichols.
48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 475-479 (2000).
Pending energy crisis: would a new oil and gas tax system help.
Frank M. Burke. 90 Tax Notes 1097-1099 (2001).
Recent changes affecting the credit for increasing research
expenditures. Sarah Berel-Harrop, Christy Mangum, Darshan
Wadhwa. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 263-277 (2002).
Rhoades oil company decision demonstrates how the phc tax can
affect oil and gas producers. Richard C. Hatfield, James Jay
Mackie. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 117-123 (2000).
Shelf corporations and the code: much ado about almost nothing.
Robert E. Blatz, Jr.. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 1-45 (2001).
Tax incentive credits: do they work. Stephen Jakubowski, Gary
Saunders. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 661-669 (2000).
Tax stategies for maximizing depreciation, including deductions
for Indian reservation property - 2001 and beyond. Robert D.
Pulliam. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 91-100 (2002).
Tax update for oil and gas firms: a new wrinkle in the
depreciation rules for MACRS property acquired in like-kind
exchanges or involuntary conversions. Cheryl T. Metrejean,
Suzanne Pinac Ward, Dan R. Ward. 20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
28-42 (2001).
Taxing North Sea oil. John H. Bartlett. 2002 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 267-280 (No. 11, 2002).
World-wide comparisons of corporate income taxes. Jack R. Fay.
49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 683-703 (2001).
TAXATION - TIMBER
Calculations of gains and losses from timber related
transactions. Darwin L. King, Kristin M. Warner. 51 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 549-565 (2003).
Forest land taxation in the new millennium: stewardship
incentivized. David J. Colligan. 78 Denv U L Rev 413-428 (2001).
Rise and fall of a Mississippi lumber company: lessons learned
from early 20th century accounting records. Shawn Mauldin,
Joseph L. Morris. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 459-474 (2001).
Surviving a timber tax audit. Darwin L. King. 51 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 157-171 (2002).
Timber accounting and tax considerations part 1 - the basics.
Darwin L. King. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 625-640 (2000).
Timber accounting and tax considerations part 2 - beyond the
basics. Darwin L. King. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 59-87 (2000).
Timber sales and form 1099 requirements. Daryl V. Burckel, Zoel
W. Daughtrey, Mike P. Watters. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 459-468
(2000).
Timber tax research process. Darwin L. King. 50 Oil Gas & Energy
Q 821-835 (2002).
Timber tax update. Darwin L. King. 50 Oil Gas & Energy Q 475-483
(2001).
Timber taxation: twenty percent tax rate makes timber more
attractive. James E. Williamson. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q 251-273
(1999).
Use of forestry incentives by nonindustrial forest landowner
groups: Is it time for a reassessment of where we spend our tax
dollars. R.A. Kluender, J.C. Pickett, T.L. Walkingstick. 39 Nat
Resources J 799-818 (1999).
TAXATION - WATER
Market-based approach to the protection of instream flow:
allowing a charitable contribution deduction for the donation of
a conservation easement in water rights. Kelly A. Cole. 6
Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 325-331 (2000).
TECHNOLOGY - OIL AND GAS
Bright spots: what do they mean. Sandi Barber. 46 Landman 33-36
(2001).
Morphology and structure of buried impact craters. P. Jan
Cannon. 45 Landman 35-41 (May/June 2000).
TECHNOLOGY - WATER
New water agenda: restoration, deconstruction, and the limits to
consensus. Marc Reisner. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-13
(2000).
THAILAND
1979 and 1990 Malaysia - Thailand joint development agreements: a
model for international legal co-operation in common offshore
petroleum deposits. David M. Ong. 14 Int'l J Marine & Coastal L
207-246 (1999).
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
TIMBER
Calculations of gains and losses from timber related
transactions. Darwin L. King, Kristin M. Warner. 51 Oil Gas &
Energy Q 549-565 (2003).
Case study on successes and failures in challenging logging
activities with adverse cumulative effects on fish and wildlife.
Laura Hartt. 32 Envtl L 671(46) (2002).
Chopping down the birds: logging and the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act. Helen M. Kim. 31 Envtl L 25 (2001).
Conflict in the forests, in the waters, and on the ranges of the
West. Anita P. Miller. 32 Urban Law 859-875 (2000).
Forest Service, water yield and community stability: defining the
contours of an agency commitment to include land grant
communities in the timber management process. Brett Olsen. 39
Nat Resources J 819-843 (1999).
Illegal traffic of timber in Cambodia. Jennifer Lynn Peters.
Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 102-112 (1999).
Judicial enforcement of forest plans in the wake of Ohio
Forestry. Trent Baker. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 81-107
(2000).
Maintaining records for timber activities. Darwin L. King. 49
Oil Gas & Energy Q 665-682 (2001).
Roadless area conservation goal: a year of trials for the stalled
regulation. Christine M. Ensley. 8 Envtl Law 639-661 (2002).
Role of eco-labels in international trade: can timber
certification be implemented as a means to slowing deforestation.
Teresa Hock. 12 Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 347-365 (2001).
Seeing the forest and the trees: the Minnesota timber harvesting
GEIS applied in Potlatch and Boise Cascade. Thaddeus R.
Lightfoot. 29 Wm Mitchell L Rev 437-497 (2002).
Special use valuation and its applicability to timber. Ted D.
Englebrecht, Alisha Kesner-Gray. 29 Real Est Tax'n 4(10) (2001).
Timber accounting and tax considerations part 2 - beyond the
basics. Darwin L. King. 49 Oil Gas & Energy Q 59-87 (2000).
Timber certification: an alternative solution to the destruction
of Chilean forests. Hale E. Sheppard. 14 J Envtl L & Litig
301-350 (1999).
Timber industry perspective: TMDLs and forestry, trying to make a
square peg round. Brian Sugden. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev
47-60 (2001).
Tough duty: U.S. - Canada softwood lumber relations in 2001.
Monte Mills. Colo J Int'l Envtl L & Pol'y 101-110 (2001).
Transaction costs and the collection of information: presale
measurement on private timber sales. Keith B. Leffler, Ian A.
Munn, Randal R. Rucker. 16 J L Econ & Org 166-188 (2000).
Who is taking a "hard look" at the environmental impact of timber
sales. Susan Gedrick Tuozzolo. 10 Vill Envtl L J 547-584 (1999).
Who is the Ninth Circuit really protecting with section 10 of the
Endangered Species Act. Dina Timber. 13 Vill Envtl L J 263-286
(2002).
TITLE
American Indian law - tribal lands - an Indian tribe that holds
title to land by transfer under ANCSA may not impose business tax
when its land is not Indian Country within statutory definition.
Stacy Belisle. 76 U Det Mercy L Rev 903-926 (1999).
Dark side of efficiency: Johnson v. M'Intosh and the
expropriation of American Indian lands. Eric Kades. 148 U Pa L
Rev 1065-1190 (2000).
Negotiation and native titles: why common law courts are not
proper fora for determining native land title issues. Geoffrey
Robert Schiveley. 33 Vanderbilt J Transnat'l L 427 (2000).
Oil and gas title searches and notice under the Surface
Development Notification Act. Richard H. Bate. 31 Colo Law
113-119 (Oct 2002).
Origin and development of the rectangular survey system. Michael
Flynn. 45 Landman 47-55 (July/Aug 2000).
Pipes, wires, and bicycles: rails-to-trails, utility licenses,
and the shifting scope of railroad easements from the nineteenth
to the twenty-first centuries. Jeffrey M. Hester, Danaya C.
Wright. 27 Ecology L Q 351-465 (2000).
Removing the Eleventh Amendment barrier: defending Indian land
title against state encroachment. Lauren E. Rosenblatt. 78 Tex L
Rev 719-759 (2000).
TITLE EXAMINATION
Common title issues: An Oklahoma perspective. Timothy C. Dowd.
44 Landman 33-46 (Sept/Oct 1999).
Negotiating title defects. Linda Ensley. 44 Landman 26-27
(Sept/Oct 1999).
Primer on conducting oil and gas operations in the northern Rocky
Mountain states: a strange new world. John R. Lee. 38 Alta L Rev
74-110 (2000).
Quiet title actions: the Swiss army knife of litigation. Richard
W. Harris. 47 Landman 61-69 (July/Aug 2002).
Texas title standards and recent cases. H. Martin Gibson. 48
Landman 61-80 (Jan/Feb 2003).
TITLE ISSUES
After acquired title revisited. Donald G. Sinex, Susan A.
Stanton. 50 Landman 13-21 (Mar/Apr 2005), reprinted in 42 Rocky
Mt Min L Fdn J No. 2 (2005).
TONGASS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN
Spirit of '76: Does President Clinton's roadless lands directive
violate the spirit of the National Forest Management Act of 1976.
Jennifer L. Sullivan. 17 Alaska L Rev 127-159 (2000).
TRANSPORTATION - NATURAL GAS
Gas directive and third party transport rights - what pipeline
volumes are available. Ketil Boe Moen. 21 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 49-84 (2003).
Municipal intervention in natural gas supply: the quest for
better weather based gas consumption models in west Texas.
William Buchanan, Paul Hodges, John Theis. 48 Oil Gas & Energy Q
351-362 (1999).
Transnational gas projects and their agreement: part II. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 138-145 (No. 6, 2002).
Transnational gas projects and their agreements: part I. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 117-126 (No. 5, 2002).
Transnational gas projects and their agreements: part III. Paul
Griffin. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 166-174 (No. 7, 2002).
TRANSPORTATION - OIL AND GAS
Gas directive and third party transport rights - what pipeline
volumes are available. Ketil Boe Moen. 21 J Energy & Nat
Resources L 49-84 (2003).
TRANSPORTATION - WATER
What the report of the world commission on dams might mean for
the United States water community. A. Dan Tarlock. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 225-232 (2001).
TRESPASS
Environmental protest and the law. Stephen Tromans. 1999 Oil &
Gas L & Tax'n Rev 342-348 (No. 12, 1999).
Hey, that's my dirt! Subsurface trespass in horizontally drilled
wells. Joy Stevens. 45 Landman 47-65 (May/June 2000), reprinted
in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
TRIBAL GOVERNMENT
Citizen suits against tribal governments and tribal officials
under federal environmental laws. Michael P. O'Connell. 36 Tulsa
L J 335-379 (2000).
Clear the muddy waters: tribal regulatory authority under section
518 of the Clean Water Act. Regina Cutler. 29 Envtl L 721
(1999).
Court's use of the implicit divestiture doctrine to implement its
imperfect notion of federalism in Indian country. Alex Tallcheif
Skibine. 36 Tulsa L J 267-304 (2000).
Decontextualizing federal Indian law: the Supreme Court's 1997-98
term. Judith V. Royster. 34 Tulsa L J 329-346 (1999).
Due process and public participation in tribal environmental
programs. John P. Lowndes, Dean B. Suagee. 13 Tulane Envtl L J
1-43 (1999).
Empowering tribes - the District of Columbia Circuit upholds
tribal authority to regulate air quality throughout reservation
lands. Kristina Marie Reader. 12 Vill Envtl L J 295-330 (2001).
Idaho nibbles at Montana: carving out a third exception for
tribal jurisdiction over environmental and natural resource
management. H. Scott Althouse. 31 Envtl L 721 (2001).
Indian country after ANCSA: divesting tribal sovereignty by
interpretation. Erin Goff Chrisbens. 76 DU L Rev 307-329 (1998).
Inherent tribal sovereignty and the Clean Water Act: the effect
of tribal water quality standards on non-Indian land located both
within and outside reservation boundaries. Andrea K. Leisy. 29
Golden Gate U L Rev 139-180 (1999).
Protecting tribal waters: the Clean Water Act takes over where
tribal sovereignty leaves off. Robert Erickson. 15 Tulane Envtl
L J 425-442 (2002).
Redesigning tribal trust law under section 164(c) of the Clean
Air Act. Ann Juliano. 35 Tulsa L J 37-54 (1999).
Reservation of rights: a practitioner's guide to Indian law in
Nevada. Gabriel S. Galanda. 10 Nev Law 23-26 (2002).
Struggle among the states, the federal government, and federally
recognized Indian tribes to establish water quality standards for
waters located on reservations. Kathleen A. Kannler. 15 Geo
Int'l Envtl L Rev 53-77 (2002).
Thorny gift: analysis of EPA's intent to empower Indian tribal
governments with Clean Air Act regulatory authority over nontribal lands and immunize tribal govt's from CAA citizen suits.
O. Wes J. Layton. 7 Envtl Law 225-294 (2001).
Tribal governments and the protection of watersheds and wetlands
in Indian country. James J. Havard, Dean B. Suagee. 13 St.
Thomas L Rev 35-64 (2000).
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Oil and gas finance under revised UCC Article 9.
Harrell. 33 Tex Tech L Rev 31-57 (2001).
Alvin C.
UNITED KINGDOM
Acquisitions and disposals on the U.K. continental shelf: an
introduction. Rob Patterson. 2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
248-255 (2001).
Analysis of recent developments in the regulation of UK oil and
gas companies. Suzanne G. M. Fifield, Alex Russell. 19 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 13-29 (2000).
Climate change levy relating to electricity generated in combined
heat and power stations. Charles Yorke. 2002 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 210-215 (No. 9, 2002).
Coming of age - the UKOITC North Sea memorandum. Peter Landon.
1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 274-279 (No. 9/10, 1999).
Developments in UK standard oil accounting procedures (SOAPs).
Alex Russell, Parulian Sihotang. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
18-37 (2002).
Environmental regulation of the UK offshore oil and gas industry.
Jeremy Rowan-Robinson. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 267-283
(2000).
Environmental taxation: The U.K.'s proposed climate change levy.
Sidney A. Price. 1999 Oil & Gas L & Tax'n Rev 335-341 (No. 12,
1999).
Investigation of the impact of the issuance of FRS 12 provisions,
contingent liabilities and contingent assets on the share prices
of the UK oil and gas companies. Juliana Jetty, Alex Russell. 21
Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 28-52 (2002).
Issues for new entrants to the UKCS - a legal analysis.
Elizabeth Pennington. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 281-285
(No. 11, 2002).
Limestone quarrying - extant 1947 - planning permission imposition of conditions - whether environmental impact
assessment required. Andrew Cotterell, Genevieve Kirkwood,
Michael Purdue. J Plan & Env't L 616-622 (July 1999).
Mineral extraction: a question of interpretation. Alexander D.
Winterton. J Plan & Env't L 783-788 (Sept 1999).
Mineral royalties and trusts. Jonathan Edwards. 149 Tax'n
496-497 (2002).
Oil and gas contracts in the UKCS - how to survive them. Judith
Aldersey-Williams, Penelope Warne. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L
302-316 (2001).
Planning status of land - clay working - mineral sites. Andrew
Cotterell, Genevieve Kirkwood, Michael Purdue. J Plan & Env't L
633-644 (July 1999).
Quarry - IDO permission - scheme of conditions - part of site
worked out - effect of scheme - construction of statutory
provisions. Andrew Cotterell, Genevieve Kirkwood, Michael
Purdue. J Plan & Env't L 622-633 (July 1999).
Recent developments in energy law in Ireland. Patrick McGovern.
2001 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev 66-72 (No. 4, 2001).
Regulation of offshore petroleum activites in Ireland. James
Bruining, Michael O'Connor. 19 J Energy & Nat Resources L 132-142
(2001).
Section 96 and schedule 13 of the Environment Act 1995 determination of conditions on mineral planning permission commencement of development - breach of planning condition.
Janet Briscoe, Andrew Cotterell, Martin Edwards. J Plan & Env't L
711-726 (July 2000).
Subterranean land law: rights below the surface of land. Jean
Howell. 53 N Ireland Leg Q 268-287 (2002).
Taking stock of change. Peter Landon. 2000 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 257-265 (No. 11, 12 2000).
U.K. offshore health and safety legislation: proposals to charge
for inspection activities. Peter Robinson. 1999 Oil & Gas L &
Tax'n Rev 253-256 (No. 9/10, 1999).
UNITIZATION
Unitization. Andrew Derman. 47 Landman 9-15 (July/Aug 2002).
Unitization - a mathematical formula to calculate
redeterminations. Peter B. Derman, Andrew B. Derman. 48 Landman
51-56 (Jan/Feb 2003).
URANIUM
Final word on depleted uranium. Dan Fahey. 25 Fletcher Forum
World Aff 189-201 (2001).
McArthur river uranium mine environmental assessment process.
Helen Cotton. 9 J Envtl L & Prac 71-91 (1999).
Uranium mining: use and disposal law in Australia: the case for a
cradle-to-grave philosophy. Chris McGrath. 17 Envtl & Plan L J
502 (2000).
VALID EXISTING RIGHTS
Valid existing rights: legal and practical realities. David L.
Deisley. 44 Landman 17-24 (Nov/Dec 1999), reprinted in 37 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
VALUATION - MINERALS
Valuation of minerals in takings cases. Rebekah King. 42 Nat
Resources J 185-210 (2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2002).
VALUATION - NATURAL RESOURCES
May be silly, but it's not an answer: the need to accept
contingent valuation methodology in natural resource damage
assessments. Miriam Montesinos. 26 Ecology L Q 48 (1999).
Practitioner's guide to drafting conservation easements and the
tax implications. Adrian Gosch, Maureen Rudolph. 4 Great Plains
Nat Resources J 143-183 (2000).
Special use valuation and its applicability to timber. Ted D.
Englebrecht, Alisha Kesner-Gray. 29 Real Est Tax'n 4(10) (2001).
VALUATION - OIL AND GAS
Effect of Enron's bankruptcy on the valuation of companies in the
oil, gas and energy industry. Chih-Chen Lee, Ena Rose-Green,
Clark M. Wheatley. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 469-478 (2003).
How do countries throughout the world compare in regards to the
types of inventory valuation methods accepted for tax purposes.
Jack R. Fay. 51 Oil Gas & Energy Q 355-369 (2002).
Issues concerning royalty valuations and deductions. John B.
McFarland. 21 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 63-86 (2002).
Marketing affiliates: differences in royalty valuation analysis
under MMS regulations and state case law. Norma Rosner Iacovo.
20 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J 35-89 (2001).
Rogers v. Westerman: "At the well" just ain't what it used to be.
Darin B. Scheer. 47 Landman 53-64 (Mar/Apr 2002).
Royalty valuation: calculating freight in a marketable-product
jurisdiction. Owen L. Anderson. 19 Petroleum Acct & Fin Mgmt J
12-43 (2000).
Royalty valuation: should overriding royalty interests and
nonparticipating royalty interests, whether payable in value or
in kind, be subject to same valuation standard as lease royalty.
Owen L. Anderson. 35 Land & Water L Rev 1-21 (2000), reprinted in
37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Selected issues in federal condemnations for underground natural
gas storage rights: valuation methods, inverse condemnations, and
trespass. Steven D. McGrew. 51 Case W Res L Rev 131-185 (2000).
Valuation analysis of environmental disclosures in the oil and
gas industry. Gary M. Fleischman, Paul D. Hutchison. 51 Oil Gas
& Energy Q 61-80 (2002).
Value of reserves-in-the-ground. Daniel Johnston. 21 Petroleum
Acct & Fin Mgmt J 120-132 (2002).
VENEZUELA
Analysis of the new Venezuelan gas regulation. Uisdean R. Vass,
Gabriela Rachadell de Delgado. 2000 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
285-289 (No. 11,12 2000).
New Venezuelan legal regime for natural gas:a hopeful new
beginning. Adriana Lezcano, Uisdean R. Vass. 36 Tex Int'l L J
99-139 (2001).
Structure of off-shore gas business on the Plataforma Deltana in
Venezuela. Juan Carlos Andrade. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
243-244 (No. 10, 2002).
Venezuela as an opportunity for investment in the petroleum
industry. Jay G. Martin. 20 Energy L J 325-344 (1999).
Venezuelan tax treatment of gas-related activities. Jose P.
Barnola Jr.. 21 Tax Notes Int'l 2499-2513 (2000).
VIETNAM
Beyond the nation state: natural resource conflict and "national
interest" in Mekong hydropower development. Philip Hirsch. 29
Golden Gate U L Rev 399-414 (1999).
Mineral law and foreign mining investments in Vietnam: a critical
review. Guillaume P. Blanc. 2002 Int'l Energy L & Tax'n Rev
216-236 (No. 9, 2002).
Mineral royalties in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparative review.
Guillaume P. Blanc, Robert B. Parsons. 2003 Int'l Energy L &
Tax'n Rev 81-96 (No. 4, 2003).
Vietnamese water resources legislation and legal regulation of
dams: views through the World Commission on Dam's suggested
policy framework. Le Thanh Long. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1631-1694
(2001).
WATER
Avulsion and landownership rights on the Platte River. John
Maynes. 8 Great Plains Nat Resources J 63-68 (2004).
Balancing current and future demands for Colorado River water
with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act. Ethan
Shaner. 28 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 951-979 (2004).
Beyond bucks and acres: land acquisition and water. Sally K.
Fairfax, Mary Ann King. 83 Tex L Rev 1941-1984 (2005).
Can oil and water mix? The impact of water law on oil, gas, and
mineral production. Michael L. Williams. 68 Tex BJ 816(8) (Oct
2005).
Chinatown: Owens Valley and western water reallocation - getting
the record straight and what it means for water markets
(California). Gary D. Libecap. 83 Tex L Rev 2055-2089 (2005).
Climate change and water: a long-term perspective. Lisa
Graumlich. 6 Wyo L Rev 347-352 (2006).
Coase theorem and western U.S. appropriative water rights. C.
Carter Ruml. 45 Nat Resources J 169-200 (2005).
Colorado River water rights: property rights in transition.
Megan Hennessy. 71 U Chi L Rev 1661-1687 (2004).
Community acequias in Colorado's Rio Culebra watershed: a
customary commons in the domain of prior appropriation. Gregory
A. Hicks, Devon G. Pena. 74 U Colo L Rev 387-486 (2003).
Conversation about takings and water rights. John D. Leshy. 83
Tex L Rev 1985-2026 (2005).
Devil in the details: water rights and title insurance. Amy W.
Beatie, Arthur R. Kleven. 7 U Denv Water L Rev 381-406 (2004).
Dividing western waters: a century of adjudicating rivers and
streams. Dar Crammond, Andrea K. Gerlak, Ramsey Laursoo Kropf,
John E. Thorson. U Denv Water L Rev 355-461 (2005).
Dusting off the blueprint for a dryland democracy: incorporating
watershed integrity and water availability into land use
decisions. Janet C. Neuman. 35 Envtl L Rep 10236-10254 (2005).
Equitable apportionment of ecosystem services: new water law for
a new water age. J.B. Ruhl. 19 J Land Use & Envtl L 47-57
(2003).
Federal income tax consequences flowing to the landowner from the
transfer of water rights. Vicki L. Barlow, Bobby E. Jelks, Derek
W. Saunders. 52 Oil Gas & Energy Q 277-287 (2003).
Fish, farms, and the clash of cultures in the Klamath Basin.
Holly Doremus, A. Dan Tarlock. 30 Ecology L Q 279-352 (2003).
Floating on uncharted headwaters: a look at the laws governing
recreational access on waters of the intermountain West. Travis
H. Burns. 5 Wyo L Rev 561-603 (2005).
Forest Service and western water rights: an intimate portrait of
United States v. New Mexico. G. Emlen Hall. 45 Nat Resources J
979-1051 (2005).
Getting our feet wet: an introduction to water trusts. Mary Ann
King. 28 Harv Envtl L rev 495-534 (2004).
Good, the bad and the ugly: the first ten years of the Oregon
Water Trust. Janet C. Neuman. 83 Neb L Rev 432-484 (2004).
Governmental interference with the use of water: when do
unconstitutional "takings" occur. Craig Bell, James H.
Davenport. 9 U Denv Water L Rev 1-71 (2005).
Heightened notice requirements for water rights applications.
Kristin Howse Moseley. 32 Colo Law 93(3) (2003).
Hip deep: A survey of state instream flow law from the Rocky
Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. Jesse A. Boyd. 43 Nat Resources
J 1151-1216 (2003).
Historic and future challenges in western water law: the case of
Wyoming. Anne MacKinnon. 6 Wyo L Rev 291-337 (2006).
Hydrology and the administration of domestic wells in New Mexico.
W. Peter Balleau, Steven E. Silver. 45 Nat Resources J 807-852
(2005).
Interior Department's Water 2025: blueprint for balance, or just
better business as usual. Reed D. Benson. 33 Envtl L Rep
10837-10846 (2003).
Is wet growth smarter than smart growth? The fragmentation and
integration of land use and water. Craig Anthony Arnold. 35
Envtl L Rep 10152-10178 (2005).
Leasing water rights for instream flow protection: the
opportunities and impediments to improved public interest
involvement in Colorado's instream flow protection regime. Jason
S. Wells. 7 U Denv Water L Rev 309-380 (2004).
Limiting liability for long-continued breach of interstate water
allocation compacts. Douglas L. Grant. 43 Nat Resources J
373-418 (2003).
Maintaining the status quo: how institutional norms and practices
create conservative water organizations. Helen Ingram, Denise
Lach, Steve Rayner. 83 Tex L Rev 2027-2053 (2005).
Multiple-use water resources development versus natural river
functions: can the WSRA and WRDA coexist on the Missouri river.
John H. Davidson. 83 Neb L Rev 362-397 (2004).
Narrowing the local public interest criterion in Idaho water
right transfers. Robert L. Harris. 39 Idaho L Rev 713-743
(2003).
New approach in water management or business as usual? The Milk
River, Montana. Barbara A. Cosens. 18 J Envtl L & Litig 1-50
(2003).
New Corps of discovery for Missouri river management. Sandra B.
Zellmer. 83 Neb L Rev 305-361 (2004).
On regulating New Mexico's domestic wells. Frank B. Titus. 45
Nat Resources J 853-863 (2005).
Out-of-priority water use: adding flexibility to the water
apropriation system. Lawrence J. MacDonnell. 83 Neb L Rev
485-540 (2004).
Parched: the future of the Glen Canyon Dam in a drier west.
Bruce Clothworthy. 17 Utah B J 8(4) (Nov 2004).
Plan to restore the public trust uses of rivers and creeks.
Richard Ross-Collins. 83 Tex L Rev 1929-1939 (2005).
Potential role of local governments in watershed management. A.
Dan Tarlock. 20 Pace Envtl L Rev 149-176 (2002).
Prescribing the right dose of peer review for the Endangered
Species Act. J.B. Ruhl. 83 Neb L Rev 398-431 (2004).
Private means to enhance public streams. Michael F. Browning.
Colo Law 69-74 (Apr 2004).
Proposal for a model state watershed management act. Jane Adams,
Leslie Duram, Steven Kraft, Christopher Lant, Tim Loftus, J.B.
Ruhl. 33 Envtl L 929(19) (2003).
Public trust and in-stream uses. Jan S. Stevens. Issues in Leg
Scholarship NA (Oct. 8, 2003).
Rehabilitating nature: a comparative review of legal mechanisms
that encourage wetland restoration efforts. Royal C. Gardner. 52
Cath U L Rev 573-620 (2003).
Responding to water scarcity in western Canada. David R. Percy.
83 Tex L Rev 2091-2107 (2005).
River commons: a new era in U.S. water policy. Daniel McCool. 83
Tex L Rev 1903-1927 (2005).
Short term solutions, interim surplus guidelines, and the future
of the Colorado River Delta. Rudy E. Verner. 14 Colo J Int'l
Envtl L & Pol'y 241-271 (2003).
So much conflict, yet so much in common: considering the
similarities between western water law and the Endangered Species
Act. Reed D. Benson. 44 Nat Resources J 29-76 (2004).
State ex rel Martinez v. City of Las Vegas: the misuse of history
and precedent in the abolition of the Pueblo Water Rights
Doctrine in New Mexico. Martha E. Mulvany. 45 Nat Resources J
1089-1116 (2005).
Supreme Court of Colorado incorrectly excused nonuse of a senior
water right contrary to precedent establishing the owners'
actions demonstrated intent to abandon. Tessa P. Hermanson. 38
Creighton L Rev 1221-1261 (2005).
Supreme Court of science speaks on water rights: the National
Academy of Sciences Columbia River report and its water policy
implications. Reed D. Benson. 35 Envtl L 85(50) (2005).
Sustainable development and private global governance. Douglas
A. Kysar. 83 Tex L Rev 2110-2166 (2005).
Sustaining the unsustainable: development of the Denver Basin
Aquifers. Eric Ryan Potyondy. 9 U Denv Water L Rev 121-157
(2005).
Taking cover: Fifth Amendment takings jurisprudence as a tool for
resolving water disputes in the American West. Jeffrey A.
Wilcox. 55 Hastings L J 477-508 (2003).
Two lost books in the water quality trilogy: the elusive
objectives of physical and biological integrity. Robert W.
Adler. 33 Envtl L 29(49) (2003).
Water and coal mining in Appalachia: applying the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and the Clean Water Act.
Robert E. Beck. 106 W Va L Rev 629-708 (2004).
Water and the West. Bill Bradley. 6 Wyo L Rev 339-345 (2006).
Water dispute resolution in the West: process elements for the
modern era in basin-wide problem solving. Barbara Cosens. 33
Envtl L 949(70) (2003).
Water giant awakes: an overview of water law in Brazil. Antonio
Herman Benjamin, Claudia Lima Marques, Catherine Tinker. 83 Tex L
Rev 2185-2244 (2005).
Water issues during the first term of the Bush-Cheney
administration. Thomas L. Sansonetti. 6 Wyo L Rev 353-366
(2006).
Water law in a democratic South Africa: a county case study
examining the introduction of a public rights system. Robyn
Stein. 83 Tex L Rev 2167-2183 (2005).
Water law reform in West Virginia: the broader context. A. Dan
Tarlock. 106 W Va L Rev 495-538 (2004).
Water scarcity and its impact on water rights: a real concern for
multinational companies. Vail T. Thorne. 33 Envtl L Rep
10617-10625 (2003).
Water scarcity, marketing, and privatization. Robert Glennon. 83
Tex L Rev 1873-1902 (2005).
Water wrongs: why can't we get it right the first time. David
Getches. 34 Envtl L 1(20) (2004), reprinted in 42 Rocky Mt Min L
Fdn J No. 2 (2005).
Western common law of tributary groundwater: implications for
Nebraska. J. David Aiken. 83 Neb L Rev 541-595 (2004).
What happens when a wetland mitigation bank goes bankrupt. Royal
C. Gardner, Theresa J. Pulley Radwan. 35 Envtl L Rep 10590-10604
(2005).
Where has all the water gone? Water marketing and the Colorado
River delta. David Parrish. 13 Transnat'l L & Contemp Probs
369-396 (2003).
WATER LAW
"Right" to float through private property in Colorado: dispelling
the myth. John R. Hill, Jr.. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 331-350
(2001).
A-Lp lite: a compromise project that fulfills the United States'
trust responsibility in an environmentally responsible manner.
Scott B. McElroy, Stanley M. Pollack. 41 Nat Resources J 639-652
(2001).
Adaptive management: how water law needs to change. Janet C.
Neuman. 31 Envtl L Rep 11432-11437 (2001).
Article update - Second update to Colorado water law: an
historical overview. Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
111-145 (2000).
Bureaucrats and Indians in a contemporary colonial encounter.
Wendy Nelson Espeland. 26 Law & Soc Inquiry.
California watershed movement: science and the politics of place.
Julie Kellner, Michael Vincent McGinnis, John T. Woolley. 42 Nat
Resources J 133-183 (2002).
Colorado river delta. Paul D'Amours. Colo J Int'l Envtl L &
Pol'y 183-191 (2000).
Concurrency laws: water as a land-use regulation. Adam Strachan.
21 (2A) J Land Resources & Envtl L 435-460 (2001).
Confluence of a river and a community: An experiment with
community-based watershed management in southwestern Colorado.
Sean T. McAllister. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 287-338 (2000).
Contractual discretion and the Endangered Species Act: can the
Bureau of Reclamation reallocate federal project water for
endangered species in the Middle Rio Grande. Joan E. Drake. 41
Nat Resources J 487-527 (2001).
Dams, international rivers, and riparian states: an analysis of
the recommendations of the World Commission on dams. Salman M.A.
Salman. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1477-1505 (2001).
Decommissioning Glen Canyon Dam: the key to Colorado River
ecosystem restoration and recovery of endangered species. Steven
W. Carothers, Dorothy A. House. 42 Ariz L Rev 215-257 (2000).
Diminished need for citizen suits to enforce the Clean Water Act.
Patrick S. Cawley. 25 J Legis 181-194 (1999).
Discovery of lunar water: an opportunity to develop a workable
Moon Treaty. Kevin V. Cook. 11 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 647-706
(1999).
Do conservation easements and water mix (in Colorado). Peter D.
Nichols. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 504-524 (2002).
Dust bowl blues: saving and sharing the Ogallala aquifer. Robert
R.M. Verchick. 14 J Envtl L & Litig 3-23 (1999).
Endangered Species Act enforcement and western water law. Jennie
L. Bricker, David E. Filippi. 30 Envtl L 735 (2000), reprinted in
38 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2001).
Energy and water - a presentation given at the 15th Camden
conference. Matthew R. Simmons. 47 Landman 27-35 (May/June
2002).
Evolution of an international water resources management regime
in the Mekong river basin. Greg Browder, Leonard Ortolano. 40
Nat Resources J 499-531 (2000).
Federal and Pacific Northwest state water laws pertaining to
dairies. Erica N. Hartliep. 37 Idaho L Rev 681-711 (2001).
Federal water policy: an idea whose time will (finally) come.
Janet C. Neuman. 20 Va Envtl L J 107-118 (2001).
Federal-state decisionmaking on water: applying lessons learned.
David J. Hayes. 32 Envtl L Rep 11253-11262 (2002).
Future of appropriation in the new West. A. Dan Tarlock. 41 Nat
Resources J 769-793 (2001), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources
L Dig (2002).
Here is a land where life is written in water: re-writing western
water law in the 21st century. Jeffrey J. Clayton. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 525-544 (2002).
Historical development of Nevada water law. Sylvia Harrison. 5
Denv U Water L Rev 148-182 (2001).
How well can international water allocation regimes adapt to
global climate change. A. Dan Tarlock. 15 J Land Use & Envtl L
423-449 (2000).
Integrating ESA goals into a larger context: the lessons of
Animas-La Plata. David J. Hayes. 41 Nat Resources J 627-638
(2001).
International law and the waters of the Euphrates and Tigris.
Yonatan Lupu. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 349 (2001).
International river basin management: data and information
exchange under international law and the case of the Mekong River
Basin. Jonathan Chenoweth. 18 J Energy & Nat Resources L 142-158
(2000).
Irrigated desert and imperiled salmon: "reclaiming" illegally
spread water via the Endangered Species Act. Peter M. Lacy. 4
Denv U Water L Rev 351-396 (2001).
Legal response to the world's water crisis: what legacy from the
Hague? What future in Kyoto. Patricia Jones, Salman M.A. Salman,
Patricia Wouters. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 418-425 (2001).
Legal underpinnings of the right to float through private
property in Colorado: a reply to John Hill. Kathy Kanda, Steven
Marlin, Lori Potter. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 457-499 (2002).
Metamorphosis of western water policy: have federal laws and
local decisions eclipsed the states' role. David H. Getches. 20
Stan Envtl L J 3-72 (2001).
Navigating the negotiation of streambed alteration agreements.
R.J. Comer. 24 LA Law 13(6) (2002).
New directions in western water law: conflict or collaboration.
Sarah B. Adler, Sarah B. Van de Wetering. 20 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 15-40 (2000).
No success like failure: the Platte River collaborative watershed
planning process. John D. Echeverria. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 559-604 (2001).
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation's San
Pedro report: a case study and analysis of the CEC. Frona M.
Powell. 6 Envtl Law 809-838 (2000).
Open meetings and open records laws: A primer for Colorado water
conservancy districts. Lee A. Miller. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
273-286 (2000).
Overview of the U.N. Convention on the law of non-navigational
uses of international watercourses. Stephen C. McCaffrey. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 57-73 (2000).
Past and future legal framework of the Nile River Basin.
Christina M. Carroll. 12 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 269-304 (1999).
Political and legal analysis of the rise and fall of western dams
and reclamation projects. Chris Bromley. 5 Denv U Water L Rev
204-224 (2001).
Potential role of local governments in watershed management. A.
Dan Tarlock. 32 Envtl L Rep 11273-11283 (2002).
Putting rivers back in the landscape: the revival of watershed
management in the United States. A. Dan Tarlock. 6 Hastings W-Nw
J Envtl l & Pol'y 167-195 (2000).
Raiders of the lost aquifer? Or, the beginning of the end to
fifty years of conflict over the Texas Edwards Aquifer. Todd H.
Votteler. 15 Tulane Envtl L J 257-334 (2002).
Reconnecting property rights to watersheds. A. Dan Tarlock. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 69-112 (2000).
Regulated riparian model water code: blueprint for twenty first
century water management. Robert E. Beck. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 113-167 (2000).
Regulating watershed restoration: why the perfect permit is the
enemy of the good project. Keith Rizzardi. 27 Nova L Rev 51-83
(2002).
Rule of Capture in Texas: an outdated principle beyond its time.
Eric Opiela. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 87-115 (2002).
Safeguarding international river ecosystems in times of scarcity.
A. Dan Tarlock. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 231-272 (2000).
Sample problem. Roberta Haley Savage. 19 Envtl Forum 26(6)
(2002).
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the art of
compromise: the evolution of a reasonable and prudent alternative
for the Animas-La Plata project. Hannah Gosnell. 41 Nat
Resources J 561-626 (2001).
Selections of poetry by Justice Greg Hobbs. Greg Hobbs. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 545-550 (2002).
Substitute supply plans: recent water law developments. Michael
F. Browning. 31 Colo Law 67(6) (2002).
Third update to Colorado water law: an historical overview.
Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 116-136 (2002).
This land is our land: ranchers seek private rights in the public
rangelands. Jeffrey J. Wechsler. 21 (2A) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 461-487 (2001).
Thy neighbor's water: a water rights lawyer declares war over the
use of the San Joaquin River. Dennis Pfaff. 21 Cal Law 57(7)
(2001).
Too much or too little - water management and the land use
planning system. Stephen Tromans. J Plan & Env't L 64-78 (Dec
15, 2001).
Transboundary jurisdiction and watercourse law: China, Kazakhstan
and the Irtysh. Eric W. Sivers. 37 Tex Int'l L J 1-42 (2002).
Uncertain waters and contested lands: excavating the layers of
Colorado's legal past. Tom I. Romero II. 73 U Colo L Rev 521-585
(2002).
Undamning Glen Canyon: lunacy, rationality, or prophecy. Scott
K. Miller. 19 Stan Envtl L J 120-207 (2000).
Use preferences for water. Robert E. Beck. 76 ND L Rev 753-784
(2000), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Wading into the water market: the first five years of the Oregon
Water Trust. Cheyenne Chapman, Janet C. Neuman. 14 J Envtl L &
Litig 135-184 (1999).
Water conservation incentives for New Mexico: policy and
legislative alternatives. William M. Fleming, G. Emlen Hall. 40
Nat Resources J 69-91 (2000).
Water, population growth, and endangered species in the West.
Holly Doremus. 72 U Colo L Rev 361-414 (2001).
Water, water everywhere, but too few drops to drink: the coming
fresh water crisis and international environmental law. Stephen
C. McCaffrey. 28 Denv J Int'l L & Pol'y 325 (2000).
Watersheds and the integration of U.S. water law and policy:
bridging the great divides. Robert W. Adler, Michele Straube. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 1-67 (2000).
We don't do groundwater: a morsel of California legal history.
Joseph L. Sax. 6 U Denv Water L Rev 269-317 (2003).
West Virginia's antidegradation policy for state waters: from
theoretical construct to implementation procedures. M. Ann
Bradley, Joseph M. Dawley. 102 W Va L Rev 331-359 (2001).
What the report of the world commission on dams might mean for
the United States water community. A. Dan Tarlock. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 225-232 (2001).
Who controls New Mexico's acequias? Acequia government and Wilson
v. Denver. Christopher J. DeLara. 40 Nat Resources J 727-753
(2000).
Who needs standing? Using California's unfair competition law to
bring Federal Clean Water Act claims in state court. Shaye
Dively-Coyne. 7 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 127-139 (2001).
WATER POLLUTION / WATER QUALITY
1969 Act and environmental protection. Lori Potter. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 70-79 (1999).
Aquifer storage and recovery in the Columbia Basin: the need for
legislative action. Peter G. Scott. 21 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 35-79 (2000).
Border farmers, water contamination, and the NAAEC environmental
side accord to NAFTA. Margaret Wilder. 40 Nat Resources J
873-894 (2000).
But you said we could do it!: oil companies' liability for the
unintended consequence of MTBE water contamination. Carrie L.
Williamson. 29 Ecology L Q 315(31) (2002).
Clean Water Act section 305(b): a potential vehicle for
incorporating economics into the "TMDL" and water quality
standards-setting processes. Melissa Thorme. 13 Tulane Envtl L J
71-94 (1999).
Clean Water Act section 401: troubled waters for federal lands
permittees. William G. Meyers, III. 41 Advoc (Idaho) 20(5)
(1998).
Clean Water Act TMDL program V: aftershock and prelude. Oliver
A. Houck. 32 Envtl L Rep 10385-10419 (2002).
Confluence of a river and a community: An experiment with
community-based watershed management in southwestern Colorado.
Sean T. McAllister. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 287-338 (2000).
Controlling nonpoint source water pollution: is help on the way
(from the courts or EPA). Robert W. Adler. 31 Envtl L Rep
10270-10282 (2001).
Court, the Clean Water Act, and the Constitution: SWANCC and
beyond. William Funk. 31 Envtl L Rep 10741-10772 (2001).
Criminal and civil remedies for transboundary water pollution.
Kristi Fettig. 15 Transnat'l Law 117-154 (2002).
Decommissioning Glen Canyon Dam: the key to Colorado River
ecosystem restoration and recovery of endangered species. Steven
W. Carothers, Dorothy A. House. 42 Ariz L Rev 215-257 (2000).
Defining hydrocommons governance along the border of the
Californias: a case study of transbasin diversions and water
quality in the Tijuana - San Diego metropolitan region. Suzanne
M. Michel. 40 Nat Resources J 931-972 (2000).
Enforcement of nonpoint source water pollution control and
abatement measures applicable to federal facilities, activities
and land management practices under federal and state law.
Steven J. Hipfel. 8 Envtl Law 75-145 (2001).
Ensuring long-term protection of water quality at Colorado mine
sites. Roger Flynn, Jeffrey C. Parsons. 30 Colo Law 83(5)
(2001).
EPA's approach to endangered species protection in state clean
water act programs. Elizabeth Rosen. 30 Envtl L 447 (2000).
EPA's proposed CAFO regulations fall short of ensuring the
integrity of our nation's waters. Michael Steeves. 22 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 367-397 (2002).
Evolution of water pollution control in the United States state, local, and federal efforts, 1789-1972. William L Andreen.
22 Stan Envtl L J 145-200 (2003).
Extending Winters to water quality: allowing groundwater for
hatcheries. Amy Choyce Allison. 77 Wash L Rev 1193-1226 (2002).
Failure of EPA's water quality reforms: from environment enhancing competition to uniformity and polluter profits. Roger
E. Meiners, Andrew P. Morriss, Bruce Yandle. 20 UCLA J Envtl L &
Pol'y 25(42) (2002).
Final frontier. Oliver A. Houck. 29 Envtl L Rep 10469-10486
(1999).
Government failure and public indifference: a portrait of water
pollution in Israel. Rachelle Adam. 11 Colo J Int'l Envtl L &
Pol'y 257-376 (2000).
How 'total' are 'total maximum daily loads'? Legal issues
regarding the scope of watershed-based pollution control under
the Clean Water Act. Michael M. Wenig. 12 Tulane Envtl L J
87-187 (1998).
Inherent tribal sovereignty and the Clean Water Act: the effect
of tribal water quality standards on non-Indian land located both
within and outside reservation boundaries. Andrea K. Leisy. 29
Golden Gate U L Rev 139-180 (1999).
Integrated approaches to water pollution: lessons from the Clean
Air Act. Robert W. Adler. 23 Harv Envtl L Rev 203-295 (1999).
Is there power in the Australian constitution to make federal
laws for water quality. Jennifer McKay, Anthony Moeller. 17
Envtl & Plan L J 294 (2000).
Keeping clean waters clean: making the Clean Water Act's
antidegradation policy work. John A. Chilson. 32 U Mich J L
Reform 545-571 (1999).
Knowing when to say when to hog waste: do state lagoon
regulations adequately protect ground water in Kansas. Keynen J.
Wall. 11 Kan J L & Pub Pol'y 113-139 (2001).
Land use, land abuse and land re-use: a framework for the
implementation of TMDLs for nonpoint source polluted waterbodies.
Paula J. Lebowitz. 29 BC Envtl Aff L Rev 97-133 (2002).
Lesson for conservation from pollution control law: cooperative
federalism for recovery under the Endangered Species Act. Robert
L. Fischman, Jaelith Hall-Rivera. 27 Colum J Envtl L 45-172
(2002).
Litigator's perspective: the Montana TMDL litigation. Jack R.
Tuholske. 22 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 3-17 (2001).
Missouri River and adaptive management: protecting ecological
function and legal process. John H. Davidson, Thomas Earl Geu.
80 Neb L Rev 816-890 (2001).
Moving beyond "jeopardy": water quality standards and the
conservation and recovery of endangered aquatic species. Andrew
C. Hanson. 20 Va Envtl L J 431-482 (2001).
Mythical giant: Clean Water Act section 401 and nonpoint source
pollution. Kristi Johnson. 29 Envtl L 417 (1999).
National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: the
Clean Water Act is the new battleground in an effort to save
anadromous fish. Scott Johnson. 31 U Tol L Rev 301-322 (2000).
New directions in western water law: conflict or collaboration.
Sarah B. Adler, Sarah B. Van de Wetering. 20 J Land Resources &
Envtl L 15-40 (2000).
Ninth Circuit's decision: "discharging" responsibility for water
pollution on federal lands. Christina Marie Frankino. 10 Vill
Envtl L J 431-515 (1999).
Quitobaquito desert pupfish, an endangered species within Organ
Pipe Cactus National Monument: Historical significance and
management challenges. Charles W. Conner, Gina Pearson. 40 Nat
Resources J 379-410 (2000).
Recent developments in surface mining: an examination of Black
Mountain and Bragg v. Robertson. Mickey Webster. 15 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 267-300 (2000-01).
Repeal of the Tulloch Rule: Is the tide of wetland regulation
receding. J. Richard Cheeks. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L
149-169 (1999-2000).
Restoring polluted waters with public values. Wendy E. Wagner.
25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 429-471 (2000).
Rivers and streams: potential impact of proposed water quality
standards on mineral development. Anthony P. Tokarz. 14 J Nat
Resources & Envtl L 187-204 (1998-99).
Role of mitigation and conservation measures in achieving
compliance with environmental regulatory statutes: lessons from
Section 316 of the Clean Water Act. Thomas J. Schoenbaum,
Richard B. Stewart. 8 NY U Envtl L J 237-331 (2000).
Salmon and water temperature: taking endangered species seriously
in establishing water quality standards. Craig N. Johnston. 33
Envtl L 151(22) (2003).
Sample problem. Roberta Haley Savage. 19 Envtl Forum 26(6)
(2002).
Searching for Cibola: community-based environmental restoration
in the Colorado River watershed. Peter W. Culp, C. Luther
Propst. 42 Ariz L Rev 259-285 (2000).
Spreading the liability net: overcoming agricultural exemption
with EPA's proprosed co-permitting regulation under the Clean
Water Act. Rebecca P. Lewandowsi. 27 Vt L Rev 149-175 (2002).
Struggle among the states, the federal government, and federally
recognized Indian tribes to establish water quality standards for
waters located on reservations. Kathleen A. Kannler. 15 Geo
Int'l Envtl L Rev 53-77 (2002).
Supreme Court struggles with damage assessment in water dispute
as interstate compact breaks down. H. David Gold. 29 Ecology L Q
427(4) (2002).
TMDL program: land use and other implications. Ron Jones, Jim
Vergura. 6 Drake J Agric L 317-331 (2001).
TMDLs for nonpoint sources in Kentucky: the potential impact of
Pronsolino v. Marcus. Monica Dias, Henry L. Stephens, Jr.. 16 J
Nat Resources & Envtl L 1-41 (2001-02).
Uncertain waters and contested lands: excavating the layers of
Colorado's legal past. Tom I. Romero II. 73 U Colo L Rev 521-585
(2002).
Upholding tribal rights to exercise civil regulatory authority
over non-Indian lands on reservations. Lauren B. Fechter. 5
Envtl Law 871-888 (1999).
Water, property, and the Clean Water Act. Janis Snoey. 78 Wash L
Rev 335-366 (2003).
Watersheds and the integration of U.S. water law and policy:
bridging the great divides. Robert W. Adler, Michele Straube. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 1-67 (2000).
West Virginia's antidegradation policy for state waters: from
theoretical construct to implementation procedures. M. Ann
Bradley, Joseph M. Dawley. 102 W Va L Rev 331-359 (2001).
What a criminal needs to know under Section 309(C)(2) of the
Clean Water Act: how far does "knowingly" travel. Thomas Richard
Uiselt. 8 Envtl Law 303-368 (2002).
When voluntary, incentive-based controls fail: structuring a
regulatory response to agricultural nonpoint source water
pollution. Douglas R. Williams. 9 Wash U J L & Pol'y 21-121
(2002).
Wisconsin v. EPA: tribal empowerment and state powerlessness
under section 518(e) of the Clean Water Act. Paul M. Drucker. 5
Univ of Denver Water L Rev 323-394 (2002).
WATER RESOURCES
Administrative versus legislative management: The impact of
discretion on water resource management in the West. Jeffrey S.
Ashley. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 223-243 (2000).
Applied and theoretical aspects of binational watershed councils
(consejos de cuencas) in the U.S. - Mexico borderlands.
Christopher P. Brown, Stephen Mumme. 40 Nat Resources J 895-929
(2000).
Aquifer storage and recovery in the Columbia Basin: the need for
legislative action. Peter G. Scott. 21 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 35-79 (2000).
Arkansas river compact. Dennis M. Montgomery, David W. Robbins.
5 Denv U Water L Rev 58-103 (2001).
Article update - Synopsis of major documents and events relating
to the Colorado river. Felix L. Sparks. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
342-356 (2000).
Beneficial use, waste, and forfeiture: the inefficient search for
efficiency in western water use. Janet C. Neuman. 28 Envtl L 919
(1998).
Blind man and the elephant: describing drought in Colorado.
Sarah Klahn. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 519-540 (2003).
Broadening U.S. water resources project planning and evaluation.
Jeffrey W. Jacobs. 42 Nat Resources J 21-31 (2002).
Bureaucrats and Indians in a contemporary colonial encounter.
Wendy Nelson Espeland. 26 Law & Soc Inquiry.
Central Utah project. Jeffrey Ashley, Robert L. Jones. 22 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 273-307 (2002).
Colorado's 1969 Adjudication and Administration Act: settling in.
Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 1-19 (1999).
Continuing saga of rippling puddles, small handles and links of
chains. Elizabeth A. Roche. 13 Vill Envtl L J 119-155 (2002).
Contractual discretion and the Endangered Species Act: can the
Bureau of Reclamation reallocate federal project water for
endangered species in the Middle Rio Grande. Joan E. Drake. 41
Nat Resources J 487-527 (2001).
Costilla creek compact. Kenneth W. Knox. 6 Denv U Water L Rev
453-489 (2003).
Counties wresting control: local responses to California's
statewide water market. Caitlin Dyckman, Ellen Hanak. 6 Denv U
Water L Rev 490-518 (2003).
Cowcatchers, salt crystals, and pork barrels: marshaling a case
to legally derail the Union Pacific Causeway. Lance Duncan
Fitzjarrald. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 291-310 (2000).
Creative programs and projects to increase water supply
mitigation and mitigation banking: strategies for meeting new
supply needs in Oregon's Deschutes Basin. Martha O. Pagel. 6
Denv U Water L Rev 29-38 (2002).
Dam policy: the emerging paradigm of restoration. Christine A.
Klein. 31 Envtl L Rep 10486-10500 (2001).
Deep trouble: options for managing the hidden threat of aquifer
depletion in Texas. Ronald Kaiser, Frank Skillern. 32 Tex Tech L
Rev 249-304 (2001).
Developing a water supply in Colorado: The role of an engineer.
Daniel S. Young. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 373-390 (2000).
Dust bowl blues: saving and sharing the Ogallala aquifer. Robert
R.M. Verchick. 14 J Envtl L & Litig 3-23 (1999).
Emerging markets in water: a comparative institutional analysis
of the Central Valley and Colorado - Big Thompson projects.
Janis M. Carey, David L. Sunding. 41 Nat Resources J 283-328
(2001).
Environmental water account: the California experience. Alf W.
Brandt. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 426-456 (2002).
Federal water policy: an idea whose time will (finally) come.
Janet C. Neuman. 20 Va Envtl L J 107-118 (2001).
Forest Service, water yield and community stability: defining the
contours of an agency commitment to include land grant
communities in the timber management process. Brett Olsen. 39
Nat Resources J 819-843 (1999).
Fresh water: toward a sustainable future. Robert W. Adler. 32
Envtl L Rep 10167-10189 (2002).
Hydro-diplomacy in south Asia: the conclusion of the Mahakali and
Ganges river treaties. Surya P. Subedi. 93 Am J Int'l L 953-962
(1999).
Implications of sustained drought for transboundary water
management in Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora. Rebecca H.
Carter, Barbara J. Morehouse, Terry W. Sprouse. 40 Nat Resources
J 783-817 (2000).
Indian tribal sovereignty and water resources: Watersheds,
ecosystems and tribal co-management. Edmund J. Goodman. 20 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 185-221 (2000).
Institutions and conjunctive water management among three western
states. William Blomquist, Tanya Heikkila, Edella Schlager. 41
Nat Resources J 653-683 (2001).
Introduction: World Commission on Dams report, Dams and
Development. Kader Asmal. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1411-1433 (2001).
La Plata river compact: administration of an ephemeral river in
the arid southwest. Kenneth W. Knox. 5 Denv U Water L Rev
104-121 (2001).
Legal regime for use and protection of international watercourses
in the Southern African region: evolution and context. Salman
M.A. Salman. 41 Nat Resources J 981-1022 (2001).
Legal response to the world's water crisis: what legacy from the
Hague? What future in Kyoto. Patricia Jones, Salman M.A. Salman,
Patricia Wouters. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 418-425 (2001).
Marketing western water: can a process based geographic
information system improve reallocation decisions. David
Brookshire, Michael Campana, Janie Chermak, Bradley Cullen, Kirk
Gregory, Kate Krause, Olen Paul Matthews, Louis Scuderi, Seth
Snell. 41 Nat Resources J 329-371 (2001).
Markets, mechanisms, institutions, and the future of water.
David W. Yoskowitz. 31 Envtl L Rep 10237- 10243 (2001).
Metamorphosis of western water policy: have federal laws and
local decisions eclipsed the states' role. David H. Getches. 20
Stan Envtl L J 3-72 (2001).
Middle Rio Grande regional water resource planning: the pitfalls
and the promises. James M. Burson. 40 Nat Resources J 533-567
(2000).
Mining of internationally shared aquifers: the El Paso - Juarez
case. Octavio E. Chavez. 40 Nat Resources J 237-260 (2000).
Navigating the river of our future: the Rio Poco-Grande. William
deBuys. 41 Nat Resources J 265-281 (2001).
Necessity of preventing unilateral responses to water scarcity the next major threat against mankind this century. Leticia M.
Diaz, Barry Hart Dubner. 9 Cardozo J Int'l & Comp L 1-40 (2001).
New water agenda: restoration, deconstruction, and the limits to
consensus. Marc Reisner. 20 J Land Resources & Envtl L 1-13
(2000).
Nile river: potential for conflict and cooperation in the face of
water degradation. Kristin Wiebe. 41 Nat Resources J 731-754
(2001).
Persistence of Powell: the idea of watersheds and participatory
democracy. Donald Snow. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 31-40
(2003).
Perspectives of a manager of the "pasturage lands between":
comparing current notions of community based watershed groups
with Powell's proposal for hydrographic districts. Ann J.
Morgan. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 25-30 (2003).
Power crisis relief via the Department of Water Resources. Holly
Jo Bohannan. 33 McGeorge L Rev 374-385 (2002).
Practically irrigable acreage standard: a poor partner for the
West's water future. Elizabeth Weldon. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 203-231 (2000).
Principles for water. Terry L. Anderson, Andrew P. Morriss,
Bruce Yandle. 15 Tulane Envtl L J 335-363 (2002).
Protecting public values in a water market setting: improving
water markets to increase economic efficiency and equity.
Charles W. Howe. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 357-372 (2000).
Public water reserves: The metamorphosis of a public land policy.
James Muhn. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 67-149 (2001).
Raiders of the lost aquifer? Or, the beginning of the end to
fifty years of conflict over the Texas Edwards Aquifer. Todd H.
Votteler. 15 Tulane Envtl L J 257-334 (2002).
Recent developments concerning state engineer rulemaking
authority for the South Platte River basin. Mike Shimmin. 6 Denv
U Water L Rev 549-556 (2003).
Recent trend for environmental compliance provides new
opportunities for land and water use at brownfields and other
contaminated sites. Robert G. Knowlton, Jeffrie Minier. 41 Nat
Resources J 919-943 (2001).
Regionalism in the west: an inventory and assessment. Craig
Fitch, Will Harmon, Matthew McKinney. 23 Pub Land & Resources L
Rev 101-191 (2002).
Rio Grande compact of 1938. William A. Paddock. 5 U Denv Water L
Rev 1-57 (2001).
Saving Snake River water and salmon simultaneously: the
biological, economic, and legal case for breeching the lower
Snake River dams, lowering JD reservoir, and restoring
natural.... Michael C. Blumm, Laird J. Lucas, Don B. Miller,
Daniel J. Rohlf, Glen H. Spain. 28 Envtl L 997(1) (1998).
Show us the money: managing our nation's estuaries. Jamie E.
Lavergne. 37 Houston L Rev 219-252 (2000).
South Africa's water and dam safety legislation: a commentary and
analysis on the impact of the World Commission on Dam's Report,
Dams and Development. Robyn Stein. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1573-1590
(2001).
State certification of inchoate water rights on the Upper Lost
River: a prelude to the Klamath adjudication. Peter G. Scott. 13
J Envtl L & Litig 475-508 (1998).
States, markets and beyond: governance of transboundary water
resources. Joachim Blatter, Helen Ingram. 40 Nat Resources J
439-473 (2000).
Teddy Roosevelt on western water issues. Hamlet J. ("Chips")
Barry, III. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 541-548 (2003).
Toward comprehensive watershed - based restoration and protection
for Great Salt Lake. Robert W. Adler. 1999 Utah L Rev 99-204
(1999).
Two nations, one river: managing ecosystem conservation in the
Colorado river delta. Michael J. Cohen, Edward P. Glenn, Daniel
F. Luecke, Jennifer Pitt, Carlos Valdes-Casillas. 40 Nat
Resources J 819-864 (2000).
U.S. - Mexico borderland water conflicts and institutional
change: a commentary. Vivienne Bennett, Lawrence A. Herzog. 40
Nat Resources J 973-988 (2000).
Upper basin perspective on California's claims to water from the
Colorado River part II: the development, implementation and
collapse of California's plan to live within its basic. James S.
Lochhead. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 318-410 (2003).
Upper basin perspective on California's claims to water from the
Colorado River, Part I: the law of the river. James S. Lochhead.
4 Denv U Water L Rev 290-330 (2001).
Use of a trilateral network: an activist's perspective on the
formation of the World Commission on Dams. Patrick McCully. 16
Am U Int'l L Rev 1453-1475 (2001).
Water associations and federal protection under 7 U.S.C. 1926(b):
a proposal to repeal monopoly status. Scott Hounsel. 80 Tex L
Rev 155-191 (2001).
Water conservation incentives for New Mexico: policy and
legislative alternatives. William M. Fleming, G. Emlen Hall. 40
Nat Resources J 69-91 (2000).
Water management options for the upper San Pedro basin: Assessing
the social and institutional landscape. Robert Merideth,
Margaret Ann Moote, Robert G. Varady. 40 Nat Resources J 223-235
(2000).
Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969: A
western slope perspective on the first thirty years. Sherry A.
Caloia, Mark E. Hamilton, Jefferson V. Houpt. 3 Denv U Water L
Rev 39-57 (1999).
Water use and cultural conflict in 19th century northwestern new
Spain and Mexico. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J 759-781
(2000).
Water, population growth, and endangered species in the West.
Holly Doremus. 72 U Colo L Rev 361-414 (2001).
Watering growth in Colorado: swept along by the current or
choosing a better line. Douglas S. Kenney, Peter D. Nichols. 6
Denv U Water L Rev 411-452 (2003).
Watershed down?: the ups and downs of watershed management in the
southwest. Kara Gillon. 5 Univ of Denver Water L Rev 395-425
(2002).
Western urban water demand. David S. Brookshire, H. Stuart
Burness, Janie M. Chermak, Kate Krause. 42 Nat Resources J
872-898 (2002).
What happens next is up to you: human rights at risk in dams and
development. Uprends Baxi. 16 Am U Int'l L Rev 1507-1529 (2001).
Whisky's fer drinkin'; water's fer fightin'!" is it? Resolving a
collective action dilemma in New Mexico. John R. Brown. 43 Nat
Resources J 185-221 (2003).
Who controls the water: incorporating environmental and social
values in water resources planning. James P. Morris. 6 Hastings
W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 117-164 (2000).
WATER RIGHTS
1969 Act and environmental protection. Lori Potter. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 70-79 (1999).
1969 Act's contributions to local governmental water suppliers.
Austin C. Hamre, David F. Jankowski, David C. Taussig. 3 Denv U
Water L Rev 20-38 (1999).
Abandon or not to abandon: what constitutes voluntary abandonment
in the wake of Scott v. McTiernan. Nicole C. Nachtigal. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 247-257 (2001).
Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Company v. Peiper: interpreting
Idaho's forfeiture statute as applied to Carey Act companies.
Lonie Boens. 5 Great Plains Nat Resources J 237-246 (2001).
Ability and responsibility of state engineer regarding
reallocation of water rights. Jeffrey W. Appel. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 41-56 (2000).
Administration of the Middle Rio Grande Basin: 1956-2002. Celina
A. Jones. 42 Nat Resources J 939-968 (2002).
Arkansas water rights: review and considerations for reform. G.
Alan Perkins. 25 U Ark Little Rock L Rev 123-154 (2002).
Article update - Synopsis of major documents and events relating
to the Colorado river. Felix L. Sparks. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
342-356 (2000).
Assessing the quality of a water right. John C. Peck. 70 J Kan
Bar Ass'n 26-36 (2001).
Braving the waters of Supreme Court takings jurisprudence: will
the Fifth Amendment protect western water rights from federal
environmental regulation. Marcus J. Lock. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
76-110 (2000).
Case for adding an ecology minute to the 1944 United States Mexico water treaty. Stephen P. Mumme. 15 Tulane Envtl L J
239-256 (2002).
Central Utah project. Jeffrey Ashley, Robert L. Jones. 22 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 273-307 (2002).
Changing legal regimes and the allocation of water between two
California rivers. Ruth Langridge. 42 Nat Resources J 283-330
(2002).
Changing political landscape of hydropower project relicensing.
Sarah C. Richardson. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 499-531
(2000).
Choices and institutions in watershed management. Jon Cannon. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 379-428 (2000).
Claim and issue preclusion in water cases: what fat lady? She
sang when. Lee E. Miller. 28 Colo Law 57(4) (1999).
Colorado supreme court addresses reasonable diligence in the
continuation of a conditional water right. Darrell Brown. 3 Denv
U Water L Rev 98-104 (1999).
Colorado's 1969 Adjudication and Administration Act: settling in.
Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 1-19 (1999).
Conveyancing and collateralizing Utah water rights. R.L. Knuth.
12 Utah B J 12(17) (Dec 1999).
Critical analysis of Colorado's Water Right Determination and
Administration Act of 1969. Melinda Kassen. 3 Denv U Water L Rev
58-69 (1999).
Developing a water supply in Colorado: The role of an engineer.
Daniel S. Young. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 373-390 (2000).
Diamond Bar Cattle Co. v. United States: Holders of state water
rights on federal lands do not also hold property interests to
graze those lands. Mark J. Baas. 4 Great Plains Nat Resources J
296-311 (2000).
Environmental takings of private water rights - the case for
water privatization. Walter Block, Roy Whitehead, Jr.. 32 Envtl
L Rep 11162-11176 (2002).
Environmental water account: the California experience. Alf W.
Brandt. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 426-456 (2002).
Federal government must pay for water to protect species under
the Endangered Species Act. Deborah Curran. 29 Ecology L Q
421(6) (2002).
Federal reserved water rights doctrine under the Wilderness Act:
Is it finally here to stay. Kelly J. Latimer. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 335-356 (2000).
Great Lakes water. James M. Olson. 80 Mich B J 32(5) (Dec 2001).
Heightened notice requirements for water rights applications.
Kristin Howse Moseley. 32 Colo Law 93-95 (June 2003).
Here is a land where life is written in water: re-writing western
water law in the 21st century. Jeffrey J. Clayton. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 525-544 (2002).
How good is an old water right? The application of statutory
forfeiture provisions to pre - code water rights. Keith
Hirokawa, Janet C. Neuman. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 1-28 (2000).
Importance of getting names right: the myth of markets for water.
Joseph W. Dellapenna. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 317-377
(2000).
Interstate water allocation: a contemporary primer for eastern
states. Robert Haskell Abrams. 24 U Ark Little Rock L Rev
155-173 (2002).
Law of water allocation in the southeastern states at the opening
of the twenty-first century. Joseph W. Dellapenna. 25 U Ark
Little Rock L Rev 9-88 (2002).
Legal underpinnings of the right to float through private
property in Colorado: a reply to John Hill. Kathy Kanda, Steven
Marlin, Lori Potter. 5 Denv U Water L Rev 457-499 (2002).
Lessons from the development of western water law for emerging
water markets: common law vs. central planning. Andrew P.
Morriss. 80 Or L Rev 861-946 (2001).
Maintaining the status quo: protecting established water uses in
the Pacific northwest, despite the rules of prior appropriation.
Reed D. Benson. 28 Envtl L 881-918 (1998), reprinted in 37 Pub
Land & Resources L Dig (2000).
Market-based approach to the protection of instream flow:
allowing a charitable contribution deduction for the donation of
a conservation easement in water rights. Kelly A. Cole. 6
Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 325-331 (2000).
Marketing western water: can a process based geographic
information system improve reallocation decisions. David
Brookshire, Michael Campana, Janie Chermak, Bradley Cullen, Kirk
Gregory, Kate Krause, Olen Paul Matthews, Louis Scuderi, Seth
Snell. 41 Nat Resources J 329-371 (2001).
Markets for nature. Barton H. Thompson, Jr.. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl
L & Pol'y Rev 261-315 (2000).
Meeting Idaho's water needs through the water right transfer
process: a call for legislative reform. David P. Jones. 38 Idaho
L Rev 213-249 (2001).
Middle Rio Grande regional water resource planning: the pitfalls
and the promises. James M. Burson. 40 Nat Resources J 533-567
(2000).
Mining of internationally shared aquifers: the El Paso - Juarez
case. Octavio E. Chavez. 40 Nat Resources J 237-260 (2000).
Mojave basin physical solution: it's a good idea, but is it good
law. Rebecca Sugarman. 6 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L & Pol'y 307-321
(2000).
New national defense water right - an alternative to federal
reserved water rights for military installations. Eric S.
Binkley, Michael J. Cianci, Jr., James F. Williams. 48 Air Force
L Rev 159-184 (2000).
Of farmers' takes and fishes' takings: Fifth Amendment
compensation claims when the Endangered Species Act and western
water rights collide. Cori S. Parobek. 27 Harv Envtl L Rev
177-225 (2003), reprinted in 40 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2003).
Partial forfeiture of water rights: Oregon compromises
traditional principles to achieve flexibility. Krista Koehl. 28
Envtl L 1137(1) (1998).
Politics of California water: Owens Valley and the Los Angeles
aqueduct, 1900-1927. William L. Kahrl. 6 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L
& Pol'y 239-253 (2000).
Politics of California water: Owens Valley and the Los Angeles
aqueduct, 1900-1927. William L. Kahrl. 6 Hastings W-Nw J Envtl L
& Pol'y 255-269 (2000).
Priority: the most misunderstood stick in the bundle. Gregory J.
Hobbs, Jr.. 32 Envtl L 37(19) (2002), reprinted in 39 Pub Land &
Resources L Dig (2002).
Protecting public values in a water market setting: improving
water markets to increase economic efficiency and equity.
Charles W. Howe. 3 Denv U Water L Rev 357-372 (2000).
Public Trust Doctrine and groundwater rights. Erik Swenson. 53
Univ Miami L Rev 363-391 (1999).
Public water reserves: The metamorphosis of a public land policy.
James Muhn. 21 J Land Resources & Envtl L 67-149 (2001).
Raiders of the lost aquifer? Or, the beginning of the end to
fifty years of conflict over the Texas Edwards Aquifer. Todd H.
Votteler. 15 Tulane Envtl L J 257-334 (2002).
Reconnecting property rights to watersheds. A. Dan Tarlock. 25
Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 69-112 (2000).
Reducing the tax burden by allocating basis to assets sold.
William L. Raby. 92 Tax Notes 1325-1330 (2001).
Regulated riparian model water code: blueprint for twenty first
century water management. Robert E. Beck. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L &
Pol'y Rev 113-167 (2000).
Relic dam dislodged by a dormant doctrine: the story of
beneficial use and Savage Rapids dam. Joe S. Whitworth. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 183-203 (2001).
Restoring polluted waters with public values. Wendy E. Wagner.
25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 429-471 (2000).
Reversing the Winter's doctrine? Denying reserved water rights
for Idaho wilderness and its implications. Michael C. Blumm. 73
U Colo L Rev 173-226 (2002).
Riding the wave of federal riparianism. Heather R. Brinton. 13
Vill Envtl L J 59-92 (2002).
Rio Grande compact of 1938. William A. Paddock. 5 U Denv Water L
Rev 1-57 (2001).
Spanish law of waters in the United States: from Alfronso the
Wise to the present day. Eric B. Kunkel. 32 McGeorge L Rev
341-384 (2001).
State certification of inchoate water rights on the Upper Lost
River: a prelude to the Klamath adjudication. Peter G. Scott. 13
J Envtl L & Litig 475-508 (1998).
State water politics versus an independent judiciary: the
Colorado and Idaho experiences. Gregory J. Hobbs, Jr.. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 122-147 (2001).
Taking nature into account: observations about the changing role
of analysis and negotiation in hydropower re-licensing. Kurt
Stephenson. 25 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol'y Rev 473-492 (2000).
Tulare case: water rights, the endangered species act, and the
fifth amendment. Melinda Harm Benson. 32 Envtl L 551(37) (2002).
Upper basin perspective on California's claims to water from the
Colorado River part II: the development, implementation and
collapse of California's plan to live within its basic. James S.
Lochhead. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 318-410 (2003).
Upper basin perspective on California's claims to water from the
Colorado River, Part I: the law of the river. James S. Lochhead.
4 Denv U Water L Rev 290-330 (2001).
Use preferences for water. Robert E. Beck. 76 ND L Rev 753-784
(2000), reprinted in 39 Pub Land & Resources L Dig (2002).
Voyage of rediscovery: lessons from Lewis & Clark for Missouri
River managers. John E. Thorson. 6 Great Plains Nat Resources J
121-130 (2002).
Wading into the water market: the first five years of the Oregon
Water Trust. Cheyenne Chapman, Janet C. Neuman. 14 J Envtl L &
Litig 135-184 (1999).
Water along the border: an introduction to "water issues in the
U.S. - Mexico borderlands. Kate A. Berry. 40 Nat Resources J
755-758 (2000).
Water fallout. Tony Mauro. 22 Am Law 59 (2000).
Water for wilderness. Karin P. Sheldon. 76 DU L Rev 555-590
(1999).
Water law - wilderness areas and federal reserved water rights:
unlimited appropriation of unallocated water endorsed by Idaho
court. R. Clark Miller. 35 Land & Water L Rev 375-394 (2000).
Water rights and Gila River III: the Winters doctrine goes
underground. E. Brendan Shane. 4 Denv U Water L Rev 397-417
(2001).
Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969: A
western slope perspective on the first thirty years. Sherry A.
Caloia, Mark E. Hamilton, Jefferson V. Houpt. 3 Denv U Water L
Rev 39-57 (1999).
Water rights for new federal land conservation programs: a turnof-the-century evaluation. John D. Leshy. 4 Denv U Water L Rev
271-289 (2001).
Watering growth in Colorado: swept along by the current or
choosing a better line. Douglas S. Kenney, Peter D. Nichols. 6
Denv U Water L Rev 411-452 (2003).
Watershed democracy: recovering the lost vision of John Wesley
Powell. Donald Worster. 23 J Land Resources & Envtl L 57-66
(2003).
Watershed down?: the ups and downs of watershed management in the
southwest. Kara Gillon. 5 Univ of Denver Water L Rev 395-425
(2002).
Westerner looks at eastern water law: reconsideration of prior
appropriation in the east. George A. Gould. 25 U Ark Little Rock
L Rev 89-121 (2002).
What the report of the world commission on dams might mean for
the United States water community. A. Dan Tarlock. 5 Denv U
Water L Rev 225-232 (2001).
WATER TRANSFERS
Defining hydrocommons governance along the border of the
Californias: a case study of transbasin diversions and water
quality in the Tijuana - San Diego metropolitan region. Suzanne
M. Michel. 40 Nat Resources J 931-972 (2000).
Meeting Idaho's water needs through the water right transfer
process: a call for legislative reform. David P. Jones. 38 Idaho
L Rev 213-249 (2001).
WETLANDS
2000 recommended websites for wetlands law. I. Wes Wheeler. 15 J
Land Use & Envtl L 305-321 (2000).
Addition by removal? National Mining limits section 404 control
of construction in wetlands. Michael Hollins. 14 J Land Use &
Envtl L 341-366 (1999).
Andrade Mesa wetlands of the all-American canal. Yamilett
Carrillo-Guerrero, Jaqueline Garcia-Hernandez, Kara Gillon,
Edward P. Glenn, Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta, Pamela L. Nagler,
Francisco Zamora-Arroyo, Enrique Zamora-Hernandez. 42 Nat
Resources J 899-914 (2002).
Clearing the muddy waters? an examination of SWANCC and the
implications for wetlands protection and the administrative
state. Brandon A. Van Balen. 36 Wake Forest L Rev 845-870
(2001).
Constitutional and takings developments with respect to wetlands
and endangered species legislation. Edgar B. Washburn. 2001 Inst
Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain 12-2(26) (2001).
Continuing saga of rippling puddles, small handles and links of
chains. Elizabeth A. Roche. 13 Vill Envtl L J 119-155 (2002).
Continuing violations doctrine and the Clean Water Act: untenable
solutions and a need for reform. David S. Foster. 32 Envtl L
717(30) (2002).
Does that line in the sand include wetlands? Congressional power
and environmental protection. Philip Weinberg. 30 Envtl L Rep
10894-10900 (2000).
Economics of environmental regulation by licensing: an assessment
of recent changes to the wetland permitting process. David
Sunding, David Zilberman. 42 Nat Resources J 59-90 (2002).
Effect of SWANCC on wetlands mitigation banking. Charles A.
Cortinovis. 9 Envtl Law 253-279 (2002).
Federal regulation of isolated wetlands after SWANCC. Stephen M.
Johnson. 31 Envtl L Rep 10669-10680 (2001).
Federal regulation of isolated wetlands: to be or not to be.
Talene Nicole Megerian. 13 Vill Envtl L J 157-188 (2002).
Integrating ecosystem services into environmental law: a case
study of wetlands mitigation banking. R. Juge Gregg, J.B. Ruhl.
20 Stan Envtl L J 365-392 (2001).
Irregular regulation under section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Is
the Congress or the Army Corps of Engineers to blame. Michael J.
Mortimer. 13 J Envtl L & Litig 445-474 (1998).
Long awaited Army Corps of Engineers administrative appeal
process for wetlands permits. Heather Jenquine. 6 Envtl Law
913-932 (2000).
Losing wetlands under the nationwide permit program. William A.
Sicheri. 8 Envtl Law 619-638 (2002).
Minimal effects exemption and the regulation of headwater
wetlands under Swampbuster, with a coda on the theme of SWANCC.
Philip P. Chandler, John H. Davidson. 31 Envtl L Rep 11417-11424
(2001).
Navigating federalism: the missing statutory analysis in Solid
Waste Agency v. Army Corps of Engineers. Robin Kundis Craig. 31
Envtl L Rep 10508-10527 (2001).
No road is a "road to nowhere for long": historic site provides
standing in South Carolina wetlands permit case. Anne Elizabeth
Mjaatvedt. 10 SC Envtl L J 87-100 (2002).
On revolution and wetland regulations. Michael J. Gerhardt. 90
Geo L J 2143-2174 (2002).
Pondering Palazzolo: why do we continue to ask the wrong
questions. Michael Allan Wolf. 32 Envtl L Rep 10367-10374
(2002).
Presenting the question of the relevance of the public trust
doctrine to the total regulatory takings analysis. Daniel A.
Nussbaum. 53 SC L Rev 509-525 (2002).
Protecting the still functioning ecosystem: the case of the
Prairie Pothole wetlands. John H. Davidson. 9 Wash U J L & Pol'y
123-162 (2002).
Regulation of wetlands: "sidecasting" and "incidental fallback"
under the CWA (Clean Water Act). Lynda J. Oswald. 29 Real Est L
J 246-255 (2001).
Repeal of the Tulloch Rule: Is the tide of wetland regulation
receding. J. Richard Cheeks. 15 J Nat Resources & Envtl L
149-169 (1999-2000).
Revised definition of "discharge of dredged material": its
legality, practicability, and impact on wetlands protection.
William S. Pufko. 9 Envtl Law 187-252 (2002).
Standing alone in murky water: evaluating the Fourth Circuit's
solitary stance on federal wetlands regulation. Christopher N.
Challis. 34 Wake Forest L Rev 1179-1204 (1999).
Supreme Court's new federalism: the authority of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers does not extend over isolated intrastate
wetlands under the migratory bird rule. Paul Edward Svensson. 19
Pace Envtl L Rev 165-195 (2001).
SWANCC decision and the future of federal, state, and local
regulation of wetlands. Jeanne A. Calderon. 30 Real Est L J
303-323 (2002).
Tribal governments and the protection of watersheds and wetlands
in Indian country. James J. Havard, Dean B. Suagee. 13 St.
Thomas L Rev 35-64 (2000).
Wetland value indicators for scoring mitigation trades. James
Boyd, Dennis King, James Salzman, Lisa A. Wainger. 20 Stan Envtl
L J 413-478 (2001).
WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT OF 1968
National Park and Conservation Ass'n v. Stanton: the Niobrara
River's Wild and Scenic river designation environmental impact
statement and general management plan. James Rogers. 5 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 177-194 (2001).
Section 2(a)(ii) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968: an
underutilized tool to designate national wild and scenic rivers.
Tom Cassidy, Jack Hannon. 17 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y 145 (1999).
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the Oregon trilogy. Charlton H.
Bonham. 21 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 109-143 (2000).
WILDERNESS
Administrative wilderness: protecting our national forestlands in
contravention of congressional intent and public policy. Brandon
Dalling. 42 Nat Resources J 385-413 (2002).
America's unprotected wilderness. H. Michael Anderson, Aliki
Moncrief. 76 DU L Rev 413-447 (1999).
Changing views of what the wilderness system is all about.
Michael McCloskey. 76 DU L Rev 369-381 (1999).
Dealing with wilderness. Liz Thomas. 21 (2B) J Land Resources &
Envtl L 593-598 (2001).
Defining wilderness: from McCloskey to legislative,
administrative and judicial paradigms. Matthew J. Ochs. 76 DU L
Rev 659-679 (1999).
Economic benefits of wilderness: theory and practice. Peter
Morton. 76 DU L Rev 465-518 (1999).
Environmental entrepreneurs: keys to achieving wilderness
conservation goals. John A. Baden. 76 DU L Rev 519-534 (1999).
Federal reserved water rights doctrine under the Wilderness Act:
Is it finally here to stay. Kelly J. Latimer. 20 J Land
Resources & Envtl L 335-356 (2000).
History and future of the conflict over wilderness designations
of BLM land in Utah. Kevin Hayes. 16 J Envtl L & Litig 203-247
(2001).
Like wilderness, but need oil? Securing America's Future Energy
Act puts little between accident-prone oil companies and the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Samuel Stanke. 32 Envtl L
905(38) (2002).
Nature of wildness: exploring what wilderness really protects.
Gregory H. Aplet. 76 DU L Rev 347-367 (1999).
Politics of wilderness preservation and ecological restoration.
Max Oelschlaeger. 42 Nat Resources J 235-246 (2002).
Preserving an enduring wilderness: challenges and threats to the
National Wilderness Preservation system. George Nickas. 76 DU L
Rev 449-463 (1999).
Protected areas and intergovernmental cooperation in the St.
Elias region. Ryan K. Danby, D. Scott Slocombe. 42 Nat Resources
J 247-282 (2002).
Protecting the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness: litigation
and legislation. Richard A. Duncan, Kevin Proescholdt. 76 DU L
Rev 621-658 (1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L Dig
(2000).
Reversing the Winter's doctrine? Denying reserved water rights
for Idaho wilderness and its implications. Michael C. Blumm. 73
U Colo L Rev 173-226 (2002).
Section 2(a)(ii) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968: an
underutilized tool to designate national wild and scenic rivers.
Tom Cassidy, Jack Hannon. 17 UCLA J Envtl L & Pol'y 145 (1999).
Talking about wilderness. Federico Cheever. 76 DU L Rev 335-345
(1999).
Water for wilderness. Karin P. Sheldon. 76 DU L Rev 555-590
(1999).
Water law - wilderness areas and federal reserved water rights:
unlimited appropriation of unallocated water endorsed by Idaho
court. R. Clark Miller. 35 Land & Water L Rev 375-394 (2000).
Wilderness Act and the courts. H. Anthony Ruckel. 76 DU L Rev
611-619 (1999).
Wilderness Act's impact on mining activities: policy versus
practice. Kenneth D. Hubbard, Marily Nixon, Jeffrey A. Smith. 76
DU L Rev 591-609 (1999), reprinted in 37 Pub Land & Resources L
Dig (2000).
Wilderness in context. George Cameron Coggins, Robert L.
Glickman. 76 DU L Rev 383-411 (1999).
Wildlands Project and the rewilding of North America. Dave
Foreman. 76 DU L Rev 535-553 (1999).
WILDERNESS ACT OF 1964
Wilderness Act of 1964: A practitioner's guide. Jared C.
Bennett, Amy Rashkin, Billie Jean Siddoway, Adam Strachan, Ashley
Swallow, James Waddoups, Jeffrey J. Wechsler. 21 J Land Resources
& Envtl L 219-285 (2001).
WILDLIFE
Applying principles of sovereignty to protect imperiled wildlife
popluations. Mary Christina Wood. 37 Idaho L Rev 1-102 (2000).
Bird has flown: the uncertain fate of wildlife on closed military
bases. Lloyd Burton, Thomas Williams. 41 Nat Resources J 885-917
(2001).
Creating new opportunities for ecosystem restoration on public
lands: An analysis of the potential for Bureau of Land Management
lands. Steven C. Forrest. 23 Pub Land & Resources L Rev 21-75
(2002).
Cultural tug of wars: an analysis of the legal issues involving
the NPS proposed rule to allow taking of Golden Eagles at Wupatki
National Monument for religious purposes. Brent Gunson. 22 J
Land Resources & Envtl L 399-433 (2002).
Embryo, not fossil: breathing life into the public trust in
wildlife. Susan Morath Horner. 35 Land & Water L Rev 23-75
(2000).
Extermination and conservation of the American bison. Dean
Lueck. 31 J Legal Stud 609-652 (2002).
Internationalization of wildlife and efforts towards its
management: a conceptual framework and the historical record.
Mark Giordano. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L Rev 607-627 (2002).
Managing wild horses on public lands: congressional action and
agency response. Kristen H. Glover. 79 NC L Rev 1108-1126
(2001).
National security and wildlife protection: maintaining an
effective balance. Paul C. Kiamos. 8 Envtl Law 457-520 (2002).
Nineteenth century wildlife law: a case study of elite influence.
Thomas Lund. 32 Ariz St L J 935-984 (2001).
Norbeck exception: mining on some public domain lands in the
Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota can be prohibited by
The Department of Agriculture. Jamie C. Thompson, III. 4 Great
Plains Nat Resources J 184-203 (2000).
Property rights and the maintenance of wildlife habitat: the case
for conservation land transactions. Federico Cheever. 38 Idaho L
Rev 431-451 (2002).
Role of state conservation plans in the listing of endangered and
threatened species. Harriet Hensley. 42 Advoc 8(5) (1999).
Teddy Roosevelt on western water issues. Hamlet J. ("Chips")
Barry, III. 6 Denv U Water L Rev 541-548 (2003).
Wildlife law: a coming of age. Eric T. Freyfogle, Dale D. Goble.
33 Entl L Rep 18-28 (2003).
Wildlife protection and public welfare doctrine. David P. Gold.
27 Colum J Envtl L 633-668 (2002).
Wildlife treaties series. Mark Giordano. 14 Geo Int'l Envtl L
Rev 629-692 (2002).
Wildlife: our most valuable public resource. Elizabeth Furse. 6
Animal L I-IV (Annual 2000).
ZONING
Current decisions on state and federal law in planning and
zoning. Bruce M. Kramer. 2000 Inst Plan Zoning & Eminent Domain
1-1(30).
Where to put a pipe - common land use law considerations - or
what is a "lulu" or nimby. Reid C. Wilson. 45 Landman 21-28
(May/June 2000).