LOGO Economics of Contract LawⅡ

advertisement
LOGO
Economics of Contract LawⅡ
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
Painting Sale I
 You value my unfinished painting at $1000
 We agree on a sale price of $600 upfront
 Crazy cousin makes $5000 offer
Buyer
Painter
Buy
Don’t Buy
Perform
600, 400
------
Breach
-400,
4600,5400
5600,
-400
600
------
 What are Expectation Damages?
 DE = $1000
 What if D = $6000
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
Painter breaches and it is efficient
Painter performs though breach is efficient
山东大学
Painting Sale II





You value my unfinished painting at $1000
We agree on a sale price of $600 upfront
Crazy cousin makes $5000 offer
Assume simple DE
Buyer purchases frame for $50 which raises value
of painting to $1200
Buyer
Painter
Rely
Don’t Rely
Perform
600, 550
600, 400
Breach
4400, 550
4600, 400
Whether painter performs or not, reliance makes you better off
But, is reliance efficient?
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
4th Purpose of Contract Law is to secure
optimal reliance.
If Expected Gain from Reliance > Cost of Reliance
then Reliance is efficient
p = probability of performance
∆V = increase in value of performance due to reliance
c = cost of reliance
If p(∆V) > C then reliance is efficient
Painter ex:
∆V = 200
c = 50
When the probability of performance is high,
more reliance tends to be efficient
 p* = 0.25
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
4th Purpose of Contract Law is to secure
optimal reliance.
 Warning: if my damages cover your benefit
whether or not it’s efficient, then you’ll always
spend on reliance (over-reliance)
 Solution: Perfection Expectations Damages
 damages needed to restore the promisee had the
promise been kept, and had he relied the optimal
amount
 Foreseeability Doctrine
 “Reasonably expected” reliance
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
Hadley v Baxendale (1854)
 Hadley ran a mill and crankshaft broke
 Baxendale was to deliver it to engineers
 Delayed one week (used boat rather than rail)
 Hadley sued for week’s worth of lost profits
 Court ruled lost profits were not foreseeable
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
5th Purpose of Contract Law is to minimize
transaction costs of negotiating contracts by
supplying efficient default rules
 Gaps: contract is silent about risks
 Inadvertent gaps: not foreseeable
 Deliberate gaps: remote risks
Cost of allocating a risk > Expected cost of allocating a loss  leave gap
Cost of allocating a risk < Expected cost of allocating a loss  fill gap
 Default rules
 Compute hypothetical bargain
• Who can bear risk at lowest cost?
• Adjust price of the contract
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
Perfect Contracts and Market Failures
 Perfect Contract
 All risks is efficiently allocated
 All relevant information is communicated
 All resources allocated to those who value it the most
 Individual Irrationality
 Incompetence
 Dire constraints
• Necessity
• Duress
 Transactions Costs
Exceptions to
perfect contracts
 Spillovers
 Asymmetric information
 Monopoly
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
6th Purpose of Contract Law is to foster enduring
relationships, which solve the problem of cooperation
with less reliance on the courts to enforce contracts
 Coffee shop and the forgotten wallet
 Prisoner’s Dilemma
 One-shot game: DS is to cheat
 Repeated game: Cooperative outcome is Pareto Optimal
“tit-for-tat” strategy
“Rarely will buyers leave saying they bought the wrong
goods at too high
a price. Our
goal is
to make them eager to
NY Diamond
Dealer’s
Club
come back. We offer a source which provides a competitive
edge, all of which translates directly into increased profits.”
 Endgame Problem
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
Peevyhouse v Garland Coal (1962)
 Peevyhouse owned farm in Oklahoma
 Garland contracted to strip-mine coal
 Contract specified that Garland would take steps to restore
land to previous condition
 Garland breached
 Peevyhouse sued for $25,000
 Restorative costs were estimated to be $29,000 at trial
 Garland showed that “diminished value” of farm was only $300
 Original jury awarded $5000 to Peevyhouse
 OK Supreme Court reduced damages to $300
 Efficient breach?
 Dissent: specific performance was warranted, otherwise no
formation would have occurred
www.econ.sdu.edu.cn
山东大学
Download