8/3/2015 49th Annual Meeting Disclosure Strategies to Improve Safety: What Really Works I do not have a vested interest in or affiliation with any corporate organization offering financial support or grant monies for this continuing education activity, or any affiliation with an organization whose philosophy could potentially bias my presentation Natasha Nicol, Pharm D, FASHP Director, Global Patient Safety Affairs Cardinal Health OWNING CHANGE: Taking Charge of Your Profession Objectives TMI time! Discuss the strategies recognized in the literature for improving patient safety Describe how to conduct an effective root cause analysis Define a just culture and how it is necessary in order to improve safety Discuss just culture implementation strategies List the steps to take when conducting an event investigation in order to understand how to prevent future errors I am a pharmacist; I was a technician for 9 years I love to travel I buy most of my (limited) wardrobe at consignment shops and drive my trucks until they have 300,000 miles I have made mistakes in my life Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture by AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) “Medicine used to be simple, ineffective, and relatively safe. Now it is complex, effective, and potentially dangerous” Only 44% of employees are confident they wouldn’t be punished if they reported an error -Sir Cyril Chantler https://www.flickr.com/photos/uclnews/8005869769/; accessed 6.22.15 10:31 am 1 8/3/2015 Emily Jerry – 2006, Ohio 17-year-old Jesica – 2003, Duke http://www.dukechronicle.com/blogs/bigblog/posts/2009/12/29/number-7-problems-duke-university-healthsystem#.VZA-r_lViko; accessed 6-22-15 2:36 pm 15-year old Lewis Blackman – 2000, MUSC Wikipedia says: Rhode Island = wrong side brain surgery (x3) Common estimates for sustained attention to a freely chosen task range from about five minutes for a two-year-old child, to a maximum of around 20 minutes in older children and adults. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_span (accessed 1-28-14 @ 6:18pm) 58-year old Jeanette McAllister 1997, Florida https://www.google.com/#q=pictures+of+Rhode+Island+Hospital; accessed 6-22-15 1:50 pm 12 2 8/3/2015 Is the healthcare industry alone? California Commuter Train Wreck - 2008 25 dead http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34978572/ns/us_news-life/t/ntsb-blames-texting-deadly-calif-rail-crash/ 14 Philadelphia Amtrak - 2015 8 dead http://nypost.com/2015/05/13/wells-fargo-exec-tech-ceo-confirmed-dead-in-amtrak-crash/; accessed 6.22.15 10:36 am I-35W Minneapolis bridge collapse 2007 Zip line accident Patricia – Maui, Hawaii 2014 http://mauinow.com/2014/05/01/maui-zipline-incident-under-investigation/; accessed 6-22-15 2:11 pm http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=129016466; accessed 6-22-15 2:15 pm Number of US bridges in danger of collapse: >7,700 13 dead Source: 2013 Federal analysis http://streets.mn/2012/08/01/five-years-after-the-bridge-collapse-transportation-priorities-are-even-worse/35w-bridge-collapse/; accessed 6.22.15 10:40 am 3 8/3/2015 Massey Mine Explosion - 2010 Arizona - 2014 http://www.topicboss.com/topic/massey-coal-mine/ 29 dead 19 http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/apr2010/mine-a12.shtml http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/26/us/arizona-girl-fatal-shooting-accident/; accessed 3-5-15 4:15 pm What we all have in common January 21, 2011 Fallible humans and human behaviors Imperfect systems Potential for faulty equipment A set of values (individual and/or corporate) 21 Great systems everywhere 22 …and some not so great… (including airport bathrooms!) 23 24 4 8/3/2015 Human Factors… Obviously a Mom Creating a Just Culture: where do you start? Just Culture definition Workers trust each other, are rewarded for providing safety information, and are clear about their responsibilities regarding safe behavioral choices. There is a shared accountability. 27 Consoling – Human Error Types of behavior involved in errors • Human Error: an inadvertent action; inadvertently doing other than what should have been done; slip, lapse, mistake • A Conversation to Learn • Help by comforting the employee • At-Risk Behavior: a behavioral choice that increases risk where risk is not recognized, or is mistakenly believed to be justified • Reckless Behavior: a behavioral choice to consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk • Manager also investigates the system and makes changes as appropriate ***The employee made the mistake, not the choice 29 30 5 8/3/2015 Repetitive Human Error: Counseling Risky Business Do you text and drive? Take action: let the employee know that performance is unacceptable 31 32 It’s all about the perception of risk Coaching at-risk behavior http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2127859/Like-father-like-son-Baby-Bob-Irwin-feeds-alligators-late-daddySteve-s-animal-park-aged-just-EIGHT.html Create a learning opportunity: - understand their point of view - describe the at-risk behavior - explain how this behavior isn’t aligned with our values - create an action plan 33 34 Drinking and Driving – clearly Reckless Question to ponder Reckless Behavior is a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk Is it ever ok to knowingly violate a rule? 35 >13,000 deaths per year 36 6 8/3/2015 Managing reckless behavior We need a Learning Culture Disciplinary action Punishment Punitive action Learn about errors and the behavioral choices behind them Learn where the system is weak Learn why people drift Yes, I said “punitive” !!!!! 37 38 39 40 Public perception…. or truth? Administrative Walk-rounds It Happened Here Promotes a Just Culture Where else should leadership spend their time? Ask questions of employees and patients Invite them to be a part of the solution Provide immediate feedback 41 Newsletter describing events and steps taken to mitigate/prevent recurrence Promotes reporting Provides feedback (elusive in healthcare) 42 7 8/3/2015 Designing more reliable systems: Creating Safer Systems Identify and minimize risks Understand and accept: perfection is NOT possible Systems can be designed to be more reliable (but we need to be able to learn) Manage human factors (humans will never be perfect) Ensure skills/competency Standardization and protocols Automation of tasks Introduce barriers Introduce redundancy 43 Good: System of vehicles and highways 44 Poor system - nonsensical Forcing functions = can’t fit diesel nozzle Barriers = concrete barriers Redundancy = frontage roads Recovery = air bags Error-reduction Strategies: People Rules and policies Education Information Performance shaping factors (checklists, reminders) Standardization and protocols Excellent system design Phone below that automatically dials the number! 8 8/3/2015 Poor (husband) system Investigation of Events Do not regard an event as “something to be fixed” An event is an opportunity to understand risks - system - behavioral Keep in mind, the system is comprised of sometimes: - faulty equipment - imperfect processes - fallible humans http://wellthisiswhatithink.com/tag/yass-mcdonalds-billboard/; accessed 6.22.15 10:50 am Personal Performance Shaping Factors Questions to ask 50 What happened? What normally happens? What does procedure require? Why did it happen? How were you managing it? These must be managed when designing systems Affect the rate of human error (and at-risk behavior): Stress Fatigue Environmental distractions design Communication Procedural 51 Scenario Avoid Severity Bias Harm vs. no harm How do you handle the situation? “no harm, no foul” doesn’t work in a Just Culture The NICU nurse goes to the automated cabinet to retrieve heparin 1,000 units/ml for her patient. Without looking into the bin, she grabs a vial. She draws up the medication and administers it to the patient. Unbeknownst to her, the pharmacy technician had refilled the bin incorrectly with 10,000 unit/ml heparin. 53 9 8/3/2015 Step 1: Identify the undesirable outcome Are there more than one? Step 2: Begin looking for causes Patient given wrong dose of heparin What happened? What normally happens? What does procedure require? RN drew up wrong med and administered it Step 3: Build a cause and effect diagram Begin with placing the outcome(s) on the right side of the page Build the diagram from right to left (include all information that could be causal) Ensure all causes have a reasonable link to their effect (can you prove it?) (cause of the behavioral choice) (behavioral choice) RN drew up wrong med and administered it (human error) Patient given wrong dose of heparin (outcome) (cause of the human error) Step 4: Explain the human error(s) What behaviors were exhibited? - Human error (any performance shaping factors increasing chance for error?) - At-risk - Reckless Every human error should have a preceding cause (cause of the behavioral choice) RN did not read the label on drug (behavioral choice) RN drew up wrong med and administered it (human error) Patient given wrong dose of heparin Pharmacy stocked the drug incorrectly (outcome) (cause of the human error) 10 8/3/2015 Step 5: Explain the violations What were the perception(s) of risk? Every at-risk behavior should have a preceding cause System performance shaping factors? Every system deviation should have a preceding cause Individual performance shaping factors? Determine the causes Probable Cause RN always got right heparin from this pocket; felt no need to read label (cause of the behavioral choice) RN did not read the label on drug (behavioral choice) Direct Cause RN drew up wrong med and administered it (human error) Patient given wrong dose of heparin Why? Pharmacy stocked the drug incorrectly (outcome) (cause of the human error) Step 6: Explain any mechanical failures Was it reasonable to expect this failure? Why/why not? Step 7: Describe direct and potential causes Step 8: Applying the Algorithm Remove any data that is non-causal A caused B (direct) A increased the likelihood of B (potential) Ensure biases are removed Just Culture Algorithm Take each person involved through the Just Culture Algorithm 11 8/3/2015 Event Building your diagram A nurse did not scan the wristband that was on the patient in bed A for positive identification during a med pass, she scanned a sticker. The patient received bed B’s hydromorphone. The patient in bed A had an anaphylactic response, had to be intubated and treated with naloxone, and was transferred to ICU. The patient fully recovered with no permanent harm. Upon further investigation, the nurse indicated she always keeps stickers on the charts to use because the wristbands rarely scan. Outcome: patient received unauthorized medication Human error: did not scan patient (drifting? risky?) Cause of the human error: Equipment Find failure out what about the equipment failed and why System RN not adequate forced to create a work-around Find out why RCA2 = In the Interest of Safety Find the causes It is the causes of the error that give us the data we need in order to begin to work on and build riskreduction strategies 69 More name dropping….. National Patient Safety Foundation 72 RCA2: Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm Big names on the core working group and expert advisors: Rollin J. “Terry” Fairbanks MD, MS, FACEP, CPPS Director, National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare and Simulation Training & Education Lab, MedStar Institute for Innovation, MedStar Health Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University John Frost President, Safety Engineering Services Inc. Member, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, ScD (hon), DPS (hon) President, Institute for Safe Medication Practices John S. Carroll Professor of Organization Studies and Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Co-Director, Lean Advancement Initiative at MIT 71 12 8/3/2015 Most important message: 73 What this document helps you do: 74 It cannot be over-emphasized that if actions resulting from an RCA2 are not implemented and measured to demonstrate their success in preventing or reducing the risk of patient harm in an effective and sustainable way, then the entire RCA2 activity will have been a waste of time and resources. Download the report FREE! Triage adverse events and close calls/near misses Identify the appropriate RCA2 team size and membership Establish RCA2 schedules for execution Use tools provided to facilitate the RCA2 analysis Identify effective actions to control or eliminate system vulnerabilities Develop Process/Outcome Measures to verify that actions worked as planned Use tools provided for leadership to assess the quality of the RCA2 process In the interest of equality….. 76 www.npsf.org/RCA2 YES! There were women involved in this effort! What does this become? https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_goose; accessed 6-22-15 2:16 pm http://www.acuteaday.com/blog/tag/goslings/; accessed 6-22-15 2:15 pm Which then becomes…. 13 8/3/2015 THIS!!!!! Know the facts! http://www.zdnet.com/article/scientists-channel-bird-brains-to-prevent-aircraft-collisions/; accessed 6-23-15 2:23 pm http://icwdm.org/handbook/birds/CanadaGeese/humanhealth.aspx; accessed 6-23-15 2:27 pm Questions – did you learn anything? 1. 2. 3. And now FREE TIME! T/F Severity bias should be avoided when investigating an event. T/F Only events with harm should be thoroughly investigated. Choose the correct statement(s): a. b. c. To begin a cause and effect diagram, begin with the outcome The outcome is the level of harm that occurred It is the causes of the errors and behaviors that allow us to begin to build risk reduction strategies 14