Building Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary
Program Type
Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP) - Regular
Setting
Suburban
Assessment Name
Silver Lake Elementary (34603) 10-02-14 - EEA
Assessment Date (on-site; non-EEA)
2015-01-06
Kitchen Type
Warming Kitchen
Cost Set:
2015
Building Name
Silver Lake Elementary
Building IRN
34603
Building Address
2970 Overlook Road
Building City
Cuyahoga Falls
Building Zipcode
44224
Building Phone
(330) 920-3632
Acreage
7.50
Current Grades:
K-5
Teaching Stations
20
Number of Floors
2
Student Capacity
301
Current Enrollment
251
Enrollment Date
2009-04-15
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.
Number of Classrooms
14
Historical Register
NO
Building’s Principal
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Building Type
Elementary
Next Page
Building Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary
Page 1
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Building Pictures - Cuyahoga Falls City(43836) - Silver Lake Elementary(34603)
North elevation photo:
East elevation photo:
South elevation photo:
West elevation photo:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
37,606 Total Existing Square Footage
1927,1946,1950,1956 Building Dates
K-5 Grades
251 Current Enrollment
20 Teaching Stations
7.50 Site Acreage
Silver Lake Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, and originally constructed in 1927, is a two story, 37,606 square foot brick and stone
school building located in a suburban residential setting. The existing facility features a conventionally partitioned design, and does not utilize modular buildings. The structure of
the overall facility contains a brick veneer with stone and painted wood trim accents on a masonry bearing wall type exterior wall construction, with glazed block, plaster, and wood
paneling type wall construction in the interior. The first and second floor system of the overall facility consists of precast concrete planks with concrete topping type construction.
The roof structure of the 1927 Original Construction is wood deck on wood rafter type construction. The roof structure of the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions is steel deck on steel
joist type construction. The roofing system of the 1927 Original Construction is a combination of a fully adhered EPDM roof over the entry portico, asphalt shingles on the sloped
areas, and asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat over the flat areas that were installed in 1999. The roofing system of the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions is an asphalt
built-up roof with gravel wear coat that was installed in 1999. The ventilation system of the building is adequate to meet the needs of the users. The Classrooms are undersized in
terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The
electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has a non-compliant automatic and manual fire alarm
system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building contains asbestos and other hazardous materials. The overall building is not
compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 7.5 acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property, playgrounds, and play areas are not
fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is good to fair. There is no dedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for
staff, visitors and community events is adequate.
No Significant Findings
Building Pictures - Cuyahoga Falls City(43836) - Silver Lake Elementary(34603)
Page 2
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Previous Page
Next Page
Building Pictures - Cuyahoga Falls City(43836) - Silver Lake Elementary(34603)
Page 3
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Building Construction Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Name
Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet Non OSDM Addition
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 no
Classroom Addition 1946 no
1
12,027 no
Classroom Addition 1950 no
1
1,364 no
Classroom Addition 1956 no
1
7,564 no
Previous Page
Next Page
Building Construction Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 4
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Building Component Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Addition
Auditorium
Agricultural
Primary
Media Vocational Student
Indoor
Adult
Board Outside
Auxiliary
Fixed
Corridors Education
Kitchen Natatorium
Gymnasium Center
Space
Dining
Tracks Education Offices Agencies Gymnasium
Seating
Lab
Original
Construction
(1927)
1632
Classroom
Addition (1946)
3738
2690
913
2,690
913
1317
772
1,317
772
Classroom
Addition (1950)
Classroom
Addition (1956)
Total
1559
0
Master Planning
Considerations
6,929
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Due to the proximity to the property lines there is limited room for expansion, with the exception of the south side of the site. There is also
the potential to infill the existing courtyard to gain additional square footage.
Previous Page
Next Page
Building Component Information - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 5
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Existing CT Programs for Assessment
Next Page
Previous Page
Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet
No Records Found
Legend:
Not in current design manual
In current design manual but missing from assessment
<Untitled>
Page 6
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Building Summary - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
Name:
Silver Lake Elementary
Contact:
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Phone:
(330) 920-3632
Address: 2970 Overlook Road
Cuyahoga Falls,OH 44224
Bldg. IRN: 34603
Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Date Prepared: 2015-01-06
By:
Bernie Merritt
Date Revised: 2015-01-22
By:
Dave Gandee
Current Grades
K-5
Acreage:
7.50
Proposed Grades
N/A
Teaching Stations:
20
Current Enrollment
251
Classrooms:
14
Projected Enrollment
N/A
CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Section
Cover Sheet
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
Classroom Addition 1946 no
1
12,027 3.0 Plant Maintainability
Addition
Classroom Addition
1950 no
1
Classroom Addition
1956 no
1
1,364 4.0 Building Safety and Security
7,564 5.0 Educational Adequacy
37,606 6.0 Environment for Education
LEED Observations
Total
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
—
—
—
100
70
70%
200
97
49%
Poor
100
53
53%
Borderline
200
102
51%
Borderline
200
103
52%
Borderline
200
125
63%
Borderline
—
—
—
—
—
—
1000
550
55%
*HA
= Handicapped Access
*Rating
=1 Satisfactory
Commentary
=2 Needs Repair
Total
=3 Needs Replacement
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
—
Satisfactory
—
—
Borderline
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
Cost Set: 2015
-
Rating
Dollar C=Under Contract
Assessment C
$1,283,116.72 - Renovation Cost Factor
104.05%
A. Heating System
3
B. Roofing
3
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
2
D. Electrical Systems
3
$8,732,930.12
$260,619.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
$23,803.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
$610,345.38 - requested from a Master Plan.
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
3
$369,642.00 -
F. Windows
2
$22,848.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation
2
$59,160.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
2
$424,327.25 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
2
$7,380.00 -
J. General Finishes
3
$1,074,473.20 -
K. Interior Lighting
3
$188,030.00 -
L. Security Systems
3
$107,177.10 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
3
$37,606.00 -
N. Fire Alarm
3
$56,409.00 -
O. Handicapped Access
2
$411,753.00 -
P. Site Condition
2
$279,051.40 -
Q. Sewage System
1
$0.00 -
R. Water Supply
1
$0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors
3
$11,100.00 -
T. Hazardous Material
3
$468,642.60 -
U. Life Safety
3
$365,991.45 -
V. Loose Furnishings
3
$188,030.00 -
W. Technology
3
$495,647.08 -
X. Construction Contingency /
Non-Construction Cost
-
$1,647,860.91 -
Total
$8,393,013.09
Previous Page
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 7
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Original Construction (1927) Summary
District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
Name:
Silver Lake Elementary
Contact:
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Phone:
(330) 920-3632
Address: 2970 Overlook Road
Cuyahoga Falls,OH 44224
Bldg. IRN: 34603
Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Date Prepared: 2015-01-06
By:
Bernie Merritt
Date Revised: 2015-01-22
By:
Dave Gandee
Current Grades
K-5
Acreage:
7.50
Proposed Grades
N/A
Teaching Stations:
20
Current Enrollment
251
Classrooms:
14
Projected Enrollment
N/A
CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Section
Cover Sheet
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
Classroom Addition
1946 no
1
12,027 3.0 Plant Maintainability
Addition
Classroom Addition
1950 no
1
Classroom Addition
1956 no
1
1,364 4.0 Building Safety and Security
7,564 5.0 Educational Adequacy
37,606 6.0 Environment for Education
LEED Observations
Total
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
—
—
—
100
70
70%
200
97
49%
Poor
100
53
53%
Borderline
200
102
51%
Borderline
200
103
52%
Borderline
200
125
63%
Borderline
—
—
—
—
—
—
1000
550
55%
*HA
= Handicapped Access
*Rating
=1 Satisfactory
Commentary
=2 Needs Repair
Total
=3 Needs Replacement
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
—
Satisfactory
—
—
Borderline
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
Cost Set: 2015
-
Rating
Dollar C=Under Contract
Assessment C
$568,132.12 - Renovation Cost Factor
104.05%
A. Heating System
3
B. Roofing
3
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
2
D. Electrical Systems
3
$4,387,753.04
$51,925.00 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
$13,325.50 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
$270,245.73 - requested from a Master Plan.
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
3
$157,457.00 -
F. Windows
2
$19,232.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation
2
$57,000.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
2
$205,338.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
2
$4,200.00 -
J. General Finishes
3
$657,244.00 -
K. Interior Lighting
3
$83,255.00 -
L. Security Systems
3
$47,455.35 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
3
$16,651.00 -
N. Fire Alarm
3
$24,976.50 -
O. Handicapped Access
2
$127,781.00 -
P. Site Condition
2
$167,582.10 -
Q. Sewage System
1
$0.00 -
R. Water Supply
1
$0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors
3
$5,100.00 -
T. Hazardous Material
3
$406,915.10 -
U. Life Safety
3
$202,487.95 -
V. Loose Furnishings
3
$83,255.00 -
W. Technology
3
$219,460.18 -
X. Construction Contingency /
Non-Construction Cost
-
$827,947.39 -
Total
$4,216,965.92
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 8
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Classroom Addition (1946) Summary
District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
Name:
Silver Lake Elementary
Contact:
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Phone:
(330) 920-3632
Address: 2970 Overlook Road
Cuyahoga Falls,OH 44224
Bldg. IRN: 34603
Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Date Prepared: 2015-01-06
By:
Bernie Merritt
Date Revised: 2015-01-22
By:
Dave Gandee
Current Grades
K-5
Acreage:
7.50
Proposed Grades
N/A
Teaching Stations:
20
Current Enrollment
251
Classrooms:
14
Projected Enrollment
N/A
CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Section
Cover Sheet
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
Classroom Addition 1946 no
1
12,027 3.0 Plant Maintainability
Addition
Classroom Addition
1950 no
1
Classroom Addition
1956 no
1
1,364 4.0 Building Safety and Security
7,564 5.0 Educational Adequacy
37,606 6.0 Environment for Education
LEED Observations
Total
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
—
—
—
100
70
70%
200
97
49%
Poor
100
53
53%
Borderline
200
102
51%
Borderline
200
103
52%
Borderline
200
125
63%
Borderline
—
—
—
—
—
—
1000
550
55%
*HA
= Handicapped Access
*Rating
=1 Satisfactory
Commentary
=2 Needs Repair
Total
=3 Needs Replacement
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
—
Satisfactory
—
—
Borderline
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
Cost Set: 2015
-
Rating
Dollar C=Under Contract
Assessment C
$410,361.24 - Renovation Cost Factor
104.05%
A. Heating System
3
B. Roofing
3
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
2
D. Electrical Systems
3
$2,475,212.68
$80,872.80 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
$6,013.50 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
$195,198.21 - requested from a Master Plan.
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
3
$107,189.00 -
F. Windows
2
$2,056.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation
2
$2,160.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
2
$123,853.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
2
$2,100.00 -
J. General Finishes
3
$247,946.00 -
K. Interior Lighting
3
$60,135.00 -
L. Security Systems
3
$34,276.95 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
3
$12,027.00 -
N. Fire Alarm
3
$18,040.50 -
O. Handicapped Access
2
$247,982.00 -
P. Site Condition
2
$63,706.90 -
Q. Sewage System
1
$0.00 -
R. Water Supply
1
$0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors
3
$6,000.00 -
T. Hazardous Material
3
$34,752.70 -
U. Life Safety
3
$38,486.40 -
V. Loose Furnishings
3
$60,135.00 -
W. Technology
3
$158,515.86 -
X. Construction Contingency /
Non-Construction Cost
-
$467,060.44 -
Total
$2,378,868.50
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 9
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Classroom Addition (1950) Summary
District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
Name:
Silver Lake Elementary
Contact:
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Phone:
(330) 920-3632
Address: 2970 Overlook Road
Cuyahoga Falls,OH 44224
Bldg. IRN: 34603
Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Date Prepared: 2015-01-06
By:
Bernie Merritt
Date Revised: 2015-01-22
By:
Dave Gandee
Current Grades
K-5
Acreage:
7.50
Proposed Grades
N/A
Teaching Stations:
20
Current Enrollment
251
Classrooms:
14
Projected Enrollment
N/A
CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Section
Cover Sheet
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
Classroom Addition 1946 no
1
12,027 3.0 Plant Maintainability
Addition
Classroom Addition 1950 no
1
Classroom Addition
1
1956 no
1,364 4.0 Building Safety and Security
7,564 5.0 Educational Adequacy
37,606 6.0 Environment for Education
LEED Observations
Total
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
—
—
—
100
70
70%
200
97
49%
Poor
100
53
53%
Borderline
200
102
51%
Borderline
200
103
52%
Borderline
200
125
63%
Borderline
—
—
—
—
—
—
1000
550
55%
*HA
= Handicapped Access
*Rating
=1 Satisfactory
Commentary
=2 Needs Repair
Total
=3 Needs Replacement
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
—
Satisfactory
—
—
Borderline
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
Cost Set: 2015
-
Rating
Dollar C=Under Contract
Assessment C
$46,539.68 - Renovation Cost Factor
104.05%
A. Heating System
3
B. Roofing
3
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
2
D. Electrical Systems
3
$271,355.11
$18,004.80 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
$682.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
$22,137.72 - requested from a Master Plan.
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
3
$17,048.00 -
F. Windows
2
$600.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation
2
$0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
2
$23,871.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
2
$480.00 -
J. General Finishes
3
$22,035.20 -
K. Interior Lighting
3
$6,820.00 -
L. Security Systems
3
$3,887.40 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
3
$1,364.00 -
N. Fire Alarm
3
$2,046.00 -
O. Handicapped Access
2
$1,920.00 -
P. Site Condition
2
$8,072.60 -
Q. Sewage System
1
$0.00 -
R. Water Supply
1
$0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors
3
$0.00 -
T. Hazardous Material
3
$4,918.40 -
U. Life Safety
3
$4,364.80 -
V. Loose Furnishings
3
$6,820.00 -
W. Technology
3
$17,977.52 -
X. Construction Contingency /
Non-Construction Cost
-
$51,203.37 -
Total
$260,792.99
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 10
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Classroom Addition (1956) Summary
District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
Name:
Silver Lake Elementary
Contact:
Ms. Rachael Seifert
Phone:
(330) 920-3632
Address: 2970 Overlook Road
Cuyahoga Falls,OH 44224
Bldg. IRN: 34603
Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Date Prepared: 2015-01-06
By:
Bernie Merritt
Date Revised: 2015-01-22
By:
Dave Gandee
Current Grades
K-5
Acreage:
7.50
Proposed Grades
N/A
Teaching Stations:
20
Current Enrollment
251
Classrooms:
14
Projected Enrollment
N/A
CEFPI Appraisal Summary
Section
Cover Sheet
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site
Original Construction 1927 no
2
16,651 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
Classroom Addition 1946 no
1
12,027 3.0 Plant Maintainability
Addition
Classroom Addition
1950 no
1
Classroom Addition 1956 no
1
1,364 4.0 Building Safety and Security
7,564 5.0 Educational Adequacy
37,606 6.0 Environment for Education
LEED Observations
Total
Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
—
—
—
100
70
70%
200
97
49%
Poor
100
53
53%
Borderline
200
102
51%
Borderline
200
103
52%
Borderline
200
125
63%
Borderline
—
—
—
—
—
—
1000
550
55%
*HA
= Handicapped Access
*Rating
=1 Satisfactory
Commentary
=2 Needs Repair
Total
=3 Needs Replacement
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
—
Satisfactory
—
—
Borderline
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
Cost Set: 2015
-
Rating
Dollar C=Under Contract
Assessment C
$258,083.68 - Renovation Cost Factor
A. Heating System
3
B. Roofing
3
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
2
D. Electrical Systems
3
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
3
$87,948.00 -
F. Windows
2
$960.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation
2
$0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
2
$71,264.75 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
2
$600.00 -
J. General Finishes
3
$147,248.00 -
K. Interior Lighting
3
$37,820.00 -
L. Security Systems
3
$21,557.40 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
3
$7,564.00 -
N. Fire Alarm
3
$11,346.00 -
O. Handicapped Access
2
$34,070.00 -
P. Site Condition
2
$39,689.80 -
Q. Sewage System
1
$0.00 -
R. Water Supply
1
$0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors
3
$0.00 -
T. Hazardous Material
3
$22,056.40 -
U. Life Safety
3
$120,652.30 -
V. Loose Furnishings
3
$37,820.00 -
W. Technology
3
$99,693.52 -
X. Construction Contingency /
Non-Construction Cost
-
$301,649.70 -
Total
104.05%
$1,598,609.29
$109,816.40 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied)
$3,782.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
$122,763.72 - requested from a Master Plan.
$1,536,385.67
Main Assessment Menu - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603)
Page 11
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
A. Heating System
Description:
The existing system for the 1927 Original Construction is a natural gas fired steam boiler type system, installed in 1927, and is in fair to poor
condition. The systems in the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions are an extension of that found in the 1951 Original Construction. 2-pipe vs. 4-pipe
designations are not applicable in this facility, as no central air conditioning is provided. The two (2) cast iron boilers, manufactured by Peerless,
were installed in 1999 and are in fair condition. Steam is distributed to terminal units consisting of unit ventilators, cabinet heaters, unit heaters,
air handlers, radiators. The terminal equipment is original to each addition and is in fair to poor condition. The system does not comply with the 15
CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic type system
temperature controls are original to each addition with incremental upgrades and are in fair condition. The system does not feature individual
temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. The overall system does not feature any central energy recovery systems. The facility
is not equipped with louvered interior doors to facilitate Corridor utilization as return air plenums. The existing system in the Gymnasium is
ducted, but the ductwork cannot be integrated into a possible future system due to arrangement, air volume, and routing of existing ductwork. The
existing system in the remainder of the overall facility is not ducted, except for the Basement, and floor to structural deck heights will
accommodate the installation of properly sized ductwork for a future Ohio School Design Manual approved system. The existing system in the
Basement is not ducted, but floor to structural deck heights will not accommodate the installation of properly sized ductwork for a future Ohio
School Design Manual approved system. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long term
life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is not equipped with a central air conditioning system. The site does not
contain underground fuel tanks.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design
Manual standards. Convert the overall facility, except for the Gymnasium to a ducted system to facilitate efficient exchange of conditioned air.
Replace existing ductwork in the remainder of the overall facility to facilitate efficient exchange of conditioned air with pricing included in
conversion to ducted system replacement. Provide architectural soffits in the Basement of the facility to accommodate the installation of ductwork,
with funding provided in conversion to ducted system replacement.
Item
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
HVAC System
Replacement:
Convert To
Ducted System
$26.12sq.ft.
$8.00sq.ft.
Sum:
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
$410,361.24
$46,539.68
$258,083.68
$1,283,116.72$568,132.12
Natural Gas Fired Steam Boilers
Comments
$982,268.72(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration
of piping layout and new controls, air conditioning)
$300,848.00(includes costs for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings,
soffits, etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC System
Replacement if the existing HVAC system is
non-ducted)
Steam Radiators
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 12
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
B. Roofing
Description:
The roof over the 1927 Original Construction is a combination of a fully adhered EPDM roof over the entry portico, asphalt shingles on the sloped
areas, and asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat system over the flat areas that was installed in 1999, and is in fair condition. The roof over
the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions is an asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat system that was installed in 1999, and is in fair condition.
There are no District reports of current leaking. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was
gained by access roof hatch with access ladder and exterior access ladders that are in fair to poor condition. Fall safety protection cages are not
required, and are not provided. There were observations of standing water on the roof. Metal and clay tile cap flashings and stone copings are in
fair to poor condition. Roof storm drainage for the 1927 Original Construction is addressed through a system of gutters and downspouts, which
are properly located, and in good to fair condition. Roof storm drainage for the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions is addressed through a system of
roof drains and downspouts, which are properly located, and in good condition. The roof is equipped with overflow roof drains in sufficient quantity
and in good condition. No problems requiring attention were encountered with any roof penetrations. There are not any covered walkways
attached to this structure.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
The roof over the overall facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines due to condition. The roof access hatch and
access ladders require replacement due to condition. 10-02-14 Update: Original assessment did not include roof replacement for the 1950
Addition. Revise to include replacing the roof on the 1950 Addition with built-up asphalt system.
Item
Asphalt Shingle:
Built-up Asphalt:
Membrane (all types):
Cost
Unit
$3.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$13.20sq.ft.
(Qty)
$8.70sq.ft.
(Qty)
$18.40ln.ft.
Whole
Building
Original Construction Classroom Addition Classroom Addition Classroom Addition Sum
Comments
(1927)
(1946)
(1950)
(1956)
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
2,047 Required
$6,141.00
2,972 Required
242 Required
Other: Roof Ladder
10 Required
Sum:
1,364 Required
7,721 Required
184 Required
Repair/replace cap flashing
and coping:
Roof Access Hatch:
$2,000.00each
$50.00ln.ft.
5,824 Required
190 Required
288 Required
1 Required
$260,619.00 $51,925.00
10 Required
$80,872.80
12 Required
$18,004.80
Asphalt Shingle and EPDM Roof Over the 1927 Original Construction
$236,029.20
$1,600.80(unless under
10,000 sq.ft.)
$13,248.00
$2,000.00(remove and
replace)
$1,600.00Replace roof access
ladder
$109,816.40
Non-Compliant Roof Ladder At the 1946 Addition
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 13
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
Description:
The overall facility is not equipped with a central air conditioning system. Window units are provided in several Classroom locations. The
ventilation system in the overall facility consists of unit ventilators, original to each addition and in fair to poor condition, providing fresh air to
Classrooms, and unit ventilators and air handlers, original to each addition and in fair to poor condition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous
spaces such as the Gymnasium, Student Dining, and Media Center. Relief air venting is provided by transfer grilles to Corridors, unit ventilators,
air handlers, and central relief fans. The ventilation system does not meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement.
The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are not
required in this facility. Exhaust systems for Restrooms, Storage Rooms, Custodial Closets, Maintenance Workrooms, Kitchen Dry Food Storage,
Locker Rooms, P.E. Workroom & Storage, and Art Rooms are inadequately placed, and in poor condition. The Art Program is equipped with a
kiln, and the existing kiln ventilation system is inadequate.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.
Replace the existing general building exhaust system. Provide the existing Art Program the required kiln ventilation system.
Item
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
Original ConstructionClassroom
(1927)
Addition (1946)
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1 Required
Required
Required
Kiln Exhaust System:
$5,000.00each
Other: General Building
$0.50sq.ft.
Exhaust System
Sum:
$23,803.00 $13,325.50
$6,013.50
Classroom
Addition (1950)
1,364 ft²
Classroom
Addition (1956)
7,564 ft²
Required
Required
$682.00
$3,782.00
Unit Ventilator
Sum
Comments
$5,000.00
$18,803.00Replace the existing general
building exhaust system.
Air Handler Unit
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 14
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
D. Electrical Systems
Description:
The electrical system provided to the 1927 Original Construction is a 120/208 volts, 600 amp, 3 phase and 4 wire system installed in 1927, and is
in poor condition. The systems in the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions are an extension of that found in the 1951 Original Construction. Power is
provided to the school by a single City of Cuyahoga Falls owned, pole-mounted transformer located at the corner of the existing parking area, and
in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1927, with upgrades in 1999, is in fair condition, but cannot be expanded to add additional
capacity. The Classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical Classroom contains four (4) general purpose outlets,
zero (0) dedicated outlets for each Classroom computer, and zero (0) dedicated outlets for each Classroom television. Some Classrooms are
equipped with as many as six (6) general purpose outlets, while others are equipped with as few as three (3) general purpose outlets. There are
not any spaces that have no electrical outlets. The Corridors are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. Adequate GFI
protected exterior outlets are not provided around the perimeter of the building. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator.
Adequate lightning protection safeguards are not provided. Stage lighting power system including control panel, breakers, and dimmers is
inadequately provided, in fair condition and does not meet OSDM requirements. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design
Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facility’s future needs.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
The entire electrical system requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for overall capacity and Classroom capacity
due to age, condition, lack of OSDM-required features, and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. Provide an emergency
generator, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Provide adequate lightning protection safeguards in the overall facility,
including associated grounding system, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Provide control panel, dimmers, and breakers
to support the Stage lighting system, with funding included in the electrical system replacement.
Item
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
System
$16.23sq.ft.
Replacement:
Sum:
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
$610,345.38 $270,245.73
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950)Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
Required
Required
Required
$195,198.21
$22,137.72
$122,763.72
Main Electrical Distribution Panel
Comments
$610,345.38(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for
life safety systems. Does not include telephone or data or
equipment) (Use items below ONLY when the entire system
is NOT being replaced)
Pole Mounted Transformer
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 15
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
Description:
The service entrance is not equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer. A water treatment system is not provided, though none is
needed. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is galvanized and copper, is original to each addition, and is in fair condition. The
waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron and galvanized, is original to each addition, and is in fair condition. The facility is equipped with 2
Bradford White 40 gallon natural gas water heaters, installed in 1999, and in good to fair condition. The overall facility contains 2 Large Group
Restrooms for boys, 2 Large Group Restrooms for girls, 1 Locker Room Restroom for boys, 1 Locker Room Restroom for girls, 0 Locker Room
Restrooms for staff, 0 Kitchen Restrooms, 1 Health Clinic Restroom, 3 Restrooms associated with Kindergarten / Pre-K Classrooms / Specialty
Classrooms, and 3 Restrooms for staff. Boys’ Large Group Restrooms contain 4 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve toilets, 6 non-ADA (3 wall / 3
floor) mounted (3 flush valve / 3 central flush) urinals, as well as 4 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Girls’ Large Group Restrooms contain 9
non-ADA floor mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 4 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Boys’ Locker Room Restrooms contain 1 non-ADA
floor mounted flush valve toilet, 1 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve urinal, 1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatory, as well as 3 non-ADA showers.
Girls’ Locker Room Restrooms contain 2 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve toilets, 2 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories, as well as 3 non-ADA
showers. Staff Restrooms contain 4 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 3 non-ADA countertop mounted lavatories. Condition of
fixtures is fair to poor. The facility is equipped with 2 non-ADA drinking fountains, as well as 3 ADA electric water coolers, in fair to poor condition.
Elementary Classrooms are not equipped with required lavatory mounted type drinking fountains. Special Education Classroom is not equipped
with the required Restroom facilities. Kitchen is not equipped with the required Restroom facilities. Health Clinic is equipped with the required
Restroom which contains 1 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 1 non-ADA countertop mounted lavatories, and fixtures are in
fair to poor condition. Kindergarten / Pre-K Classrooms are equipped with Restroom facilities which contain 5 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve
toilets, 1 non-ADA floor mounted flush valve urinal, as well as 3 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories, and fixtures are in fair to poor condition.
Kitchen fixtures consist of two (2) triple-compartment sinks, one (1) hand sink, and one (1) dishwashing unit with built-in Hatco water heater,
which are in fair condition. The Kitchen is equipped with two (2) unsatisfactory grease interceptors due to age, condition, and insufficient capacity.
The Kitchen is not provided the required 140 degree hot water supply. CONTINUED
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Replace galvanized water supply piping in the overall facility with copper piping due to age and condition. Replace sanitary waste piping in the
overall facility due to age and condition. To facilitate the school’s compliance with OBC and OSFC requirements, provide 16 lavatory mounted
type drinking fountains. Due to age, condition, and OSFC standards, replace 18 lavatories, 26 toilets, 8 urinals, and 3 electric water coolers. See
Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. See Item J for provisions on Kitchen related equipment. Provide the service
entrance with a reduced pressure back flow preventer. Replace the Kitchen grease trap interceptors due to age, condition, and insufficient
capacity. Provide the Kitchen with a water booster heater. Provide 2 additional exterior wall hydrants. Replace the existing Custodial Closet
service sinks due to age and condition.
Item
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
1 Required
Required
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
Back Flow Preventer:
Domestic Supply
Piping:
Sanitary Waste
Piping:
Toilet:
Urinal:
Sink:
Electric water cooler:
Other: Exterior Wall
Hydrants
Other: Kitchen
Grease Trap
Other: Kitchen Water
Heater
Other: Lavatory
Mounted Type
Drinking Fountain
Other: Service Sink
$5,000.00unit
$3.50sq.ft.
Required
Required
Required
$5,000.00
$131,621.00(remove / replace)
Required
Required
Required
Required
$131,621.00(remove / replace)
$1,500.00unit
$1,500.00unit
$1,500.00unit
$3,000.00unit
$1,400.00per
unit
$5,000.00per
unit
$5,100.00per
unit
$1,500.00per
unit
6 Required
1 Required
3 Required
1 Required
2 Required
10 Required
3 Required
3 Required
$500.00per
unit
1 Required
1 Required
$3.50sq.ft.
Sum:
Facility Assessment
10 Required
3 Required
4 Required
1 Required
1 Required
1 Required
$39,000.00(remove / replace) See Item O
$6,000.00(remove / replace)
$10,500.00(remove / replace)
$9,000.00(double ADA)
$2,800.00Provide 2 additional exterior wall hydrants.
$5,000.00Replace the Kitchen grease trap interceptors
due to age, condition, and insufficient capacity.
$5,100.00Provide the Kitchen with a water booster heater.
1 Required
$369,642.00 $157,457.00
Comments
$107,189.00
5 Required
4 Required
1 Required
$17,048.00
Page 16
$22,500.00To facilitate the school’s compliance with OBC
and OSFC requirements, provide 16 lavatory
mounted type drinking fountains.
$1,500.00Replace the existing Custodial Closet service
sinks due to age and condition.
$87,948.00
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Wall Hung Central Flush Urinals
Floor Mounted Flush Valve Toilet
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 17
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
F. Windows
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double glazed insulated glazing type window systems. The
window system in the 1927 Original Construction was installed in 1982 and is good to fair condition. The window system in the 1946, 1950 and
1956 Additions was installed in 1999, and is in good condition. Window system seals are in good condition, with no air and water infiltration being
experienced. Window system hardware is in good condition. The window system features surface mounted blinds and shades, which are in good
to fair condition. The window system in the 1927 Original Construction is not equipped with insect screens on operable windows. The window
system in the 1946, 1950 and 1956 Additions is equipped with insect screens on operable window, which are in good condition. This facility is not
equipped with any curtain wall systems. This facility does not feature any glass block windows. The majority of exterior doors in the overall facility
are equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with double glazed insulated glazing, in good condition. The main
entry door to the 1927 Original Construction is equipped with wood frame sidelights and transom with single pane glazing, in fair condition. The
school does not contain skylights. Window security grilles are not provided for the majority of ground floor windows. Security grilles are provided
for two ground floor windows in the 1946 Addition, and are in good condition. There is no Greenhouse associated with this school.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide insect screens for operable windows in the 1927 Original Construction. Replace defective surface mounted blinds and shades as
required through the overall facility. Recaulking of perimeter joints of all exterior windows in the 1927 Original Construction is addressed in Item
H. Replace single pane glazing in the 1927 Original Construction main entry sidelights and transom.
Item
Cost
Unit
Other: Provide Window
$8.00sq.ft.
Screens
(Qty)
Other: Replace Defective
$8.00sq.ft.
Surface Mounted Blinds and
(Qty)
Shades
Other: Replace Transoms $28.00sq.ft.
and Sidelights
(Qty)
Sum:
Whole
Building
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
770 Required
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
1,543 Required
257 Required
75 Required
120 Required
$2,056.00
$600.00
$960.00
26 Required
$22,848.00 $19,232.00
Typical Windows in the 1927 Original Construction
Comments
$6,160.00Provide insect screens for operable
windows in the 1927 Original Construction.
$15,960.00Replace defective surface mounted blinds
and shades as required in through the
overall facility.
$728.00Replace single pane glazing in the 1927
Original Construction main entry sidelights
and transom.
Typical Classroom Windows in the 1950 and 1956 Additions
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 18
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
G. Structure: Foundation
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with masonry and concrete foundation walls on concrete footings. One area of differential settlement and cracking
was observed at the southwest corner of the 1946 Addition. The foundations in the overall facility are in fair condition. The District reports that
there has been past leaking at the exterior stairs next to the Boiler Room in the 1927 Original Construction. A site drainage deficiency was noted
at the perimeter of the 1946 Addition that is contributing to the foundation settlement.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide drainage tile system for the existing roof drains from on the west side of the 1946 Addition. Address foundation leaking issue at the
exterior Boiler Room wall in the 1927 Original Construction. 10-02-14 Update: There is significant water damage and water infiltration at the
foundation along the South elevation West elevation (main entry). Revise "Foundation Leaking Issue" line item quantity from 200 sf to 600 sf and
cost/sf from $50/sf to $95/sf to excavate, provide under drains water proofing of foundation wall.
Item
Cost
Unit
Whole
Building
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Drainage Tile Systems / $18.00ln.ft.
Foundation Drainage:
Other: Address
$95.00sq.ft.
600 Required
Foundation Leaking
(Qty)
Issues
Sum:
$59,160.00 $57,000.00
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
120 Required
Comments
$2,160.00(include excavation and backfill)
$57,000.00Address foundation leaking issue at the
exterior Boiler Room wall in the 1927 Original
Construction.
$2,160.00
$0.00
$0.00
Location of Leaking in the 1927 Original Construction Boiler Room
Exterior Wall at Grade
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 19
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
Description:
The overall facility has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed locations of deterioration, and is in good to fair
condition. The exterior masonry does not contain control joints and none are needed as there is no indication of exterior masonry cracking or
separation. The school does not contain expansion joints, and none are needed as there is no indication of exterior masonry cracking or
separation. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration and locations of
staining. Architectural exterior accent materials consist of stone and painted wood trim which are in fair condition. Interior walls are glazed block,
plaster and wood paneling and are in fair condition. Interior masonry does not contain control joints, and none are needed as there is no
indication of cracking or separation. The window sills in the 1927 Original Construction are brick and are in good to fair condition. The window sills
in the 1946, 1950 and 1956 Additions are stone and are in good condition. The exterior lintels are steel, and are rusting and in fair condition.
Chimneys are in fair condition and require masonry tuckpointing, cleaning and sealing. Canopies and soffits over entrances are plaster type
construction, and are in good to fair condition. A loading dock has not been provided to facilitate unloading of trucks and receipt of product /
supplies / food stuffs. The stone and clay tile copings at roof lines are in fair condition and require repointing. The wood columns at the main entry
to the 1927 Original Construction are deteriorating and require replacement.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall facility. Provide masonry repairs as required through the
overall facility. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing and caulking as required through the overall facility. Prep and paint exposed steel lintels
through the overall facility. Prep and paint wood cornices and trim in the 1927 Original Construction and the 1956 Addition. Repoint stone copings
in 1927 Orginal Construction and the 1946 and 1956 Additions. Repoint stone window sills in the 1946, 1950 and 1956 Additions. Repoint brick
window sills in the 1927 Original Construction. Replace clay tile copings as required in the 1927 Original Construction. Replace wood columns at
the 1927 Original Construction main entry. Replace perimeter window sealant in the 1927 Original Construction. Provide masonry infill for unit
ventilator openings in exterior walls. Prep and paint exterior plaster soffits. 10-02-14 Update: Steel Lintels rusted and deteriorated and should be
replaced. Provide for lintel replacement. Wood Cornice and Facia deteriorated. Provide budget to replace wood Cornice and Facia with Fypon of
same profile. Reduce ’’Prep and Paint Cornice and Trim’’ line item from 1,512 lf to 200 lf.
Item
Cost
Unit
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
3,807 Required
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
9,518 Required
10,296 Required 2,218 Required 6,082 Required $42,171.00(wall surface)
9,518 Required
10,296 Required 2,218 Required 6,082 Required $28,114.00(wall surface)
1,960 Required
165 Required
2,712 Required 632 Required
62 Required
20 Required
$12.75sq.ft.
(Qty)
$12.75sq.ft.
(Qty)
$8.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$8.00ln.ft.
48 Required
25 Required
2,855 Required
3,089 Required 445 Required
241 Required
168 Required
230 Required
130 Required
$8.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
200 Required
Tuckpointing:
$5.25sq.ft.
(Qty)
Exterior Masonry
$1.50sq.ft.
Cleaning:
(Qty)
Exterior Masonry Sealing:
$1.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
Exterior Caulking:
$5.50ln.ft.
Lintel Replacement:
$250.00ln.ft.
Other: Masonry Infill
Other: Masonry Repairs
Other: Prep and Paint
Soffits
Other: Prep and Paint
Steel Lintels
Other: Prep and Paint
Wood Trim and Cornices
Whole
Building
4,118 Required 665 Required
36 Required
1,825 Required $54,678.75(wall surface)
1,736 Required $38,720.00(removing and replacing)
40 Required
$71,750.00(total removal and replacement including
pinning and shoring)
14 Required
$1,236.75Provide masonry infill for unit ventilator
openings in exterior walls.
1,216 Required $96,963.75Provide masonry repairs as required
through the overall facility.
$3,272.00Prep and paint exterior plaster soffits.
60 Required
896 Required
Other: Recaulk
$2.50ln.ft.
Perimeter Window Joints
Other: Replace Clay Tile
$25.00ln.ft.
Copings
Other: Replace Entry
$2,500.00each
Columns
Other: Replace Wood
$35.00ln.ft.
Cornice and Facia
Other: Repoint Brick Sills
$7.50ln.ft.
2,514 Required
230 Required
0 Required
Other: Repoint Stone
Copings
$7.50ln.ft.
490 Required
402 Required
Other: Repoint Stone
Window Sills
Sum:
$7.50ln.ft.
Facility Assessment
10 Required
60 Required
4 Required
1,256 Required
$424,327.25 $205,338.00
420 Required
130 Required
36 Required
60 Required
$123,853.00
$23,871.50
$71,264.75
Page 20
Comments
$3,648.00Prep and paint exposed steel lintels
through the overall facility.
$8,768.00Prep and paint wood cornices and trim in
the 1927 Original Construction and the
1956 Addition.
$6,285.00Replace perimeter window sealant in the
1927 Original Construction.
$1,500.00Replace clay tile copings as required in
the 1927 Original Construction.
$10,000.00Replace wood columns at the 1927
Original Construction main entry.
$43,960.00Replace Wood Cornice and Facia with
Fypon of same profile
$1,725.00Repoint brick window sills in the 1927
Original Construction.
$9,840.00Repoint stone copings in 1927 Orginal
Construction and the 1946 and 1956
Additions.
$1,695.00Repoint stone window sills in the 1946,
1950 and 1956 Additions.
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Masonry Condition in the 1948 Addition
Wood Column at the 1927 Original Construction Entry
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 21
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
Description:
The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab-on-grade type construction, and is in fair condition due to cracking of
the floor slab in the southwest corner of the 1946 Addition. There is a tunnel space located under the Corridors of the 1946 Addition with
cast-in-place reinforced concrete type construction, and is in good condition. The floor construction of the first and second floors of the overall
facility precast concrete planks with concrete topping type construction, and is in good to fair condition due to some cracks in the Corridors.
Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in required renovations, except in
the basement, where architectural soffits will be required. The roof construction of the 1927 Original Construction is wood deck on wood rafter
type construction, and is in good condition. The roof construction of the 1946, 1950, and 1956 Additions is steel deck on steel joist type
construction, and is in good condition.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Repair cracks in the 1927 Original Construction and 1946 Addition concrete slab. Repair cracks in the 1950 and 1956 Additions elevated floor
slabs. Refer to Item U for pricing of fire suppression system for wood structures. Refer to Item A for funding of architectural soffits to
accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work.
Item
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
Other: Floor Crack Repair and $60.00ln.ft.
Refinish
Sum:
$7,380.00
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
70 Required
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
35 Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
8 Required
Classroom Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
10 Required
$4,200.00
$2,100.00
$480.00
$600.00
Wood Roof Structure Over the 1927 Original Construction
Sum
Comments
$7,380.00Repair cracks in
slab.
Crack In the Floor Slab In the Southwest Classroom Of the 1946 Addition
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 22
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
J. General Finishes
Description:
The 1927 Original Construction features conventionally partitioned Classrooms with VAT flooring, plaster ceilings, as well as plaster wall finishes,
and they are in fair to poor condition. The 1927 Original Construction has Corridors with terrazzo flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as
plaster and painted brick wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The 1946, 1950, and 1956 Addition features conventionally partitioned
Classrooms with VAT, VCT, and carpet flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as glazed block and plaster wall finishes, and they are in fair to
poor condition. The 1946, 1950, and 1956 Addition has Corridors with terrazzo flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as glazed block and
plaster wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Restrooms with terrazzo flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as
glazed block and plaster wall finishes, and they are in fair to poor condition. Toilet partitions are metal, and are in poor condition. Classroom
casework in the overall facility is wood type construction with plastic laminate or wood tops, is adequately provided, and in poor condition. The
typical Classroom contains 26 lineal feet of casework, and Classroom casework provided ranges from 16 to 32 feet. Classrooms are provided
with adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards, which are in fair to poor condition. The Classroom storage cubbies and coat hooks,
located in the Classrooms, are adequately provided, and in poor condition. The Art program is equipped with a kiln in fair to poor condition, and
existing kiln ventilation is inadequate. The facility is equipped with wood non-louvered interior doors that are flush recessed without proper ADA
hardware and clearances, and in poor condition. The Gymnasium spaces have wood flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as plaster and wood
panel wall finishes, and they are in fair to poor condition. Wood Gymnasium flooring has been well maintained, will accommodate no future
sandings and refinishings, and is rated at an advanced stage of its product lifecycle. Gymnasium fixed stands are wood type construction in poor
condition. Gymnasium basketball backboards are fixed type, and are in poor condition. The Media Center, located in the 1927 Original
Construction, has carpet flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as plaster wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Student Dining, located in
the 1927 Original Construction, has VAT flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, as well as plaster and glazed block wall finishes, and they are in fair to
poor condition. OSDM-required fixed equipment for Stage is inadequately provided, and in poor condition. The existing Kitchen is full service, is
undersized based on current enrollment, and the existing Kitchen equipment, installed in the 1950’s, and is in poor condition. The Kitchen hood is
in poor condition, and is not equipped with the required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang on all
three exposed sides of the cooking equipment is not provided by the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is not of proper construction material
and/or installed as required by the OSDM and OBMC. Reach-in coolers and freezers are located within the Kitchen spaces, and are in fair to poor
condition.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, I, K, L, M, N, T, U, and due to
condition. Provide for repairs to terrazzo flooring due to condition. Provide for the replacement of interior doors due to condition. Other doors are
funded in Item O due to opening expansion. Provide for the replacement of Kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Provide for the
replacement of the Kitchen exhaust hood due to age and condition. Provide for the replacement of toilet partitions due to condition. Provide for
the replacement of toilet accessories due to condition. Provide for the replacement of Gymnasium seating due to condition. Provide for the
replacement of Gymnasium wood floors due to product lifecycle. Provide for the replacement of Gymnasium basketball goals due to condition.
Provide for the replacement of the Art Program kiln due to condition. Provide for the replacement of hard plaster due to work in Item T.
Item
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
Classroom
Classroom
Addition (1946) Addition
12,027 ft²
(1950)
1,364 ft²
Required
Required
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1956)
7,564 ft²
$1,000.00per
stall
$0.20sq.ft.
3 Required
10 Required
7 Required
Required
Required
Required
$1,300.00each
24 Required
10 Required
4 Required
$25.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$6,500.00each
300 Required
2 Required
$13,000.00(electric)
$110.00per
seat
Art Program Kiln:
$2,750.00each
Hard Plaster
$9.00sq.ft.
Replacement
(Qty)
Kitchen Exhaust Hood: $56,000.00per
unit
Total Kitchen Equipment
$190.00sq.ft.
Replacement:
(Qty)
251 Required
$27,610.00(based on current enrollment)
Other: Gymnasium
Wood Floors
Sum:
2,690 Required
Complete Replacement
of Finishes (excludes
casework) (Elementary):
Toilet Partitions:
Toilet Accessory
Replacement
Door, Frame, and
Hardware:
Terrazzo Floor Repair
Basketball Backboard
Replacement
Bleacher Replacement
Facility Assessment
Cost
Unit Whole
Building
$11.80sq.ft.
$30.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
Required
Comments
$443,750.80(elementary, per building area, with removal of
existing)
$20,000.00(removing and replacing)
$7,248.40(per building area)
$49,400.00(non-ADA)
$7,500.00(floor area affected; max. area to be 300 sf)
1 Required
$2,750.00
9,888 Required 8,958 Required660 Required 4,920 Required$219,834.00(Hazardous Material Replacement Cost - See
T.)
1 Required
$56,000.00(includes fans, exhaust & ductwork)
772 Required
$1,074,473.20$657,244.00
$146,680.00(square footage based upon only existing area
of food preparation, serving, kitchen storage
areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and
removal of existing kitchen equipment)
$80,700.00Provide for the replacement of Gymnasium
wood floors due to product lifecycle.
$247,946.00
$22,035.20
Page 23
$147,248.00
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Typical Corridor Finishes in the 1927 Original Construction
Typical Corridor Finishes in the 1946 Addition
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 24
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
K. Interior Lighting
Description:
The typical Classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Classroom
fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 41 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical
Corridors in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 suspended and T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching.
Corridor fixtures are in good to fair condition, providing an average illumination of 21 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the
OSDM. The Gymnasium spaces are equipped with surface mount metal halide type lighting, in fair condition, providing an average illumination of
33 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture
type lighting in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 59 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The
Student Dining spaces are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Student Dining
fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 45 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Kitchen
spaces are equipped with T-12 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Kitchen fixtures are in fair to poor
condition, providing an average illumination of 66 FC, which is less than the 75-80 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Service Areas in the
overall facility are equipped with incandescent and T-12 1x4 suspended fluorescent fixture type lighting in poor condition, providing inadequate
illumination. The typical Administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 suspended fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair
condition, providing inadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not compliant with Ohio
School Design Manual requirements due to age, condition, inadequate lighting levels, lack of multi-level switching, the utilization of incandescent
fixtures, and the utilization of T-12 fluorescent fixtures.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to age, condition, inadequate lighting levels, lack of multilevel switching, the utilization of
incandescent fixtures, the utilization of T-12 fixtures), and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, J, and U.
Item
Cost Unit Whole
Building
Complete Building Lighting
Replacement
Sum:
$5.00sq.ft.
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
$188,030.00 $83,255.00
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
Required
$60,135.00
$6,820.00
Student Dining Fluorescent Light Fixtures
Classroom Addition Sum
Comments
(1956)
7,564 ft²
Required
$188,030.00Includes demo of
existing fixtures
$37,820.00
Corridor Fluoresent Light Fixtures
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 25
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
L. Security Systems
Description:
The overall facility contains a Honeywell motion sensor type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are inadequately provided in main
entries, central gathering areas, offices, main Corridors, and spaces where 6 or more computers are located. Exterior doors are not equipped with
door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is provided. Compliant color CCTV cameras are not provided at main entry areas, parking lots,
central gathering areas, and main Corridors. A compliant computer controlled access control system integrating alarms and video signals, with
appropriate UPS backup, is not provided. The system is not equipped with card / biometric readers. The security system is inadequately provided
throughout, and the system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Existing playground fencing is not fully compliant
with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with surface mounted HID high pressure sodium /
mercury vapor entry lights in fair condition. Pedestrian walkways are not illuminated. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas are not illuminated.
The exterior site lighting system provides inadequate coverage.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide complete replacement of exterior site
lighting system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide playground fencing to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines,
funding included in complete replacement of security system.
Item
Cost Unit Whole
Building
$1.85sq.ft.
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
Required
Security System:
Exterior Site
Lighting:
Sum:
$1.00sq.ft.
Required
Required
Required
Required
$34,276.95
$3,887.40
$21,557.40
$107,177.10 $47,455.35
Security System Motion Detection Device
Sum
Comments
$69,571.10(complete, area of
building)
$37,606.00(complete, area of
building)
Surface Mounted HID High Pressure Sodium Light Fixture
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 26
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of non compliant plastic construction exit signs, as well as
OSDM compliant red lettered, cast aluminum construction, and LED illuminated exit signs and the system is in fair condition. The facility is not
adequately equipped with emergency egress floodlighting, and the system is in fair condition. The system is not provided with appropriate battery
backup and emergency generator on separate circuits. The system is inadequately provided throughout, and does not meet Ohio School Design
Manual and Ohio Building Code requirements.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item
Cost Unit Whole
Building
Emergency/Egress
Lighting:
Sum:
$1.00sq.ft.
$37,606.00
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
Required
$16,651.00
$12,027.00
$1,364.00
$7,564.00
Emergency Egress Light Fixture
Sum
Comments
$37,606.00(complete, area of
building)
Non-compliant Illuminated Exit Sign
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 27
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
N. Fire Alarm
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with an addressable Gamewell Flex 610 fire alarm system, installed in 1999, and in fair condition, consisting of
manual pull stations, smoke detectors, and horn and strobe indicating devices. The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The
system is not equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating devices, and smoke detectors. The system is not equipped with any flow
switches, tamper switches, or heat sensors. The system thus will not support future fire suppression systems. The system is not adequately
provided throughout, and does not have additional zone capabilities. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA, and Ohio
School Design Manual requirements.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of fire alarm system to meet OBC, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item
Cost Unit Whole
Building
Fire Alarm
System:
Sum:
$1.50sq.ft.
$56,409.00
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
Required
$24,976.50
$18,040.50
$2,046.00
Fire Alarm System Manual Pull Station and Horn and Strobe Indication Device
Classroom Addition Sum
Comments
(1956)
7,564 ft²
Required
$56,409.00(complete new system, including
removal of existing)
$11,346.00
Fire Alarm System Smoke Detection Device
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 28
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
O. Handicapped Access
Description:
At the site, there is not an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloading
zone to the main entrance of the school due to steps at the entrance. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The
exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is compromised by steps or steep ramps.
Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power
assist door. Playground layout and equipment are mostly compliant, including two areas with poured-in-place rubber safety surfacing. On the
interior of the building, space allowances and reach ranges are not compliant. There is an accessible route through the building which does
include protruding objects. Ground and floor surfaces are compliant. Steps and stairwells do not meet all ADA requirements, and are insufficient
due to handrails and space allowances at entries to steps. Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by non-compliant steps at
the stage in fair condition. Access to the Stage is not facilitated by a chair lift or ramp. Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated
by four non-compliant stairwells in fair condition, and seven non-compliant steps in fair condition. Special provisions for floor level changes in this
two story structure are insufficient due to lack of ramps, lifts or elevators. This multistory building does not have a compliant elevator that
accesses every floor. Interior doors of the overall facility are fully recessed, are not provided adequate clearances, and are not provided with
ADA-compliant hardware. 15 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and none are currently provided. 15 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and
none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 4 are currently provided. No ADA-compliant showers are required for this
grade level, and none are currently provided. 2 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 4 are currently provided. Toilet partitions
are metal, and do not provide appropriate ADA clearances even though ADA accessories are often mounted in some restrooms in an attempt to
provide access. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. Mirrors do not meet ADA requirements for mounting
heights. Health Clinic Restroom is not compliant with ADA requirements due to lack of appropriate ADA clearances and ADA-compliant
accessories. Kitchen and Special Education Restrooms are not provided. ADA signage is provided on both the interior and the exterior of the
building.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide 2 ADA-compliant power assist door openers, 1 elevator, 1 chair lift, 4 exterior ramps, 8 toilets, 8 sinks, 6 toilet partitions with toilet
accessories, 18 doors and frames in the overall facility to facilitate the school’s meeting of ADA requirements. Replace handrails at steps to the
Stage with ADA compliant handrails. Remount 8 mirrors for ADA compliance. Enlarge and reconfigure new single ADA Toilet Rooms for the
Health Clinic, 3 Staff, and 1 shared Toilet Room between the Kindergarten Classrooms, including 5 toilets, 5 sinks and 5 sets of ADA
accessories. Add 2 new single ADA Toilet Room for the Special Education Classroom and Kitchen, including 2 toilets, 2 sinks, and 2 sets of ADA
accessories. Toilet partitions issues are corrected in Item J. ADA compliant sink base casework in the Classrooms is corrected in Item J. For
interior doors that are not being replaced under this Item, door hardware to be replaced with funding provided in Item J. Stairwells are corrected in
Item U. 10-02-14 Update: Change handicapped restroom conversion allowance from $10,000 for each restroom to $16,761.00 for each restroom.
Add Allowance of $25,707.00 for converting space to handicapped accessible Family Restroom.
Item
Cost
Unit
Ramps:
$40.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
Lifts:
$15,000.00unit
Elevators:
$42,000.00each
Toilet/Urinals/Sinks:
$1,500.00unit
ADA Assist Door & Frame: $7,500.00unit
Replace Doors:
$5,000.00leaf
Replace Doors:
Whole
Building
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
115 Required
4 Required
1 Required
Other: Add Handrails
68 Required
Facility Assessment
Classroom
Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
4 Required
1 Required
4 Required
4 Required
2 Required
1 Required
4 Required
$411,753.00 $127,781.00
Comments
$15,000.00(complete)
$126,000.00(per stop, $84,000 minimum)
$24,000.00(replacement ADA)
$15,000.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)
$50,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood
door, HM frame, door/light, includes
hardware)
$40,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to
accommodate ADA standards when door
opening is set back from edge of corridor and
cannot accommodate a wheelchair.)
$2,280.00
$25,707.00Add Family Rest Room to meet ADA
requirements (includes fixtures, walls, door
and hardware, floor drain, and supply lines
from nearby existing Restroom).
$1,360.00Add/Replace ADA Compliant handrails at the
steps to the Stage
$100,566.00Enlarge existing Restroom to meet ADA
requirements
2 Required
$247,982.00
Sum
$11,840.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete)
8 Required
2 Required
$16,761.00each
3 Required
8 Required
6 Required
Remount Restroom Mirrors
$285.00per
to Handicapped Height:
restroom
Other: Add Accessible
$25,707.00each
Family Restroom
Other: Enlarge existing
Restroom to meet ADA
requirements
Sum:
Classroom
Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
48 Required
1 Required
$5,000.00leaf
$20.00ln.ft.
Classroom
Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
133 Required
$1,920.00
Page 29
$34,070.00
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Typical Classroom Corridor
Typical Stairwell
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 30
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
P. Site Condition
Description:
The 7.5 acre flat site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree, shrub, and floral landscaping. There are no outbuildings.
There are no apparent problems with erosion or ponding. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A single entrance onto the site
impedes proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one way bus traffic is not provided. There is a curbside bus loading and
unloading zone behind the school, which is not separated from other vehicular traffic. Staff and visitor parking is facilitated by an asphalt parking
lot in fair condition, containing 38 parking places, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The site and
parking lot drainage design, consisting of sheet drainage and trench drains, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with
parking lot ponding were observed. Concrete asphalt curbs in good condition are appropriately placed. Concrete and brick sidewalks are properly
sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in good condition. Trash pick-up and service drive pavement is not
heavy duty and is in poor condition, and is equipped with a concrete pad area for dumpsters, which is in good condition. The exterior stairs are in
poor condition and feature non-compliant handrails and guardrails. Site fencing is not provided. The play areas are separated from vehicular
traffic by concrete curbing and landscaping. The playground equipment is primarily constructed of coated steel and high density plastic, is in good
to fair condition, placed to provide compliant fall zones, and on a non-compliant pea gravel soft surface of sufficient and on a compliant rubber
solid surface, with a basketball court being provided on an asphalt surface. The playground area is equipped with tables and benches in good
condition. The athletic facilities are comprised of baseball field and a multipurpose field, and are in good condition. Site features are suitable for
outdoor instruction, which is enhanced through the District’s provision of benches and picnic table. Due to the proximity to the property lines there
is limited room for expansion, with the exception of the south side of the site. There is also the potential to infill the existing courtyard to gain
additional square footage.
Rating:
2 Needs Repair
Recommendations:
Provide a dedicated and separated bus loading and unloading zone on the site. Provide for replacement of exterior stair due to condition.
Replace exterior handrail/guardrails due to condition. Provide for the replacement of the asphalt wear layer due to condition. Provide for the
replacement of asphalt pavement at the hard surface play area. Provide additional Playground mulch as the soft surface material to allow for a
sufficient depth. Provide site contingency allowances for unforeseen conditions. 10-02-14 Update: Side stairwell @ SE Corner of building (leading
down to media center) needs replaced and a larger catch basin and drain installed to prevent storm water from entering the lower level of
building. Add allowance to rebuild stairwell and install better storm drainage.
Item
Replace Existing Asphalt
Paving (heavy duty):
Asphalt Paving / New Wearing
Course:
Bus Drop-Off for Elementary
Exterior Hand / Guard Rails:
Provide Soft Surface
Playground Material:
Replace Concrete Steps:
Base Sitework Allowance for
Unforeseen Circumstances
Cost
Unit
$30.60sq. yard
Original
Classroom
Construction
Addition
(1927)
(1946)
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,051 Required 764 Required
$19.00sq. yard
490 Required
$110.00per
student
132 Required
$43.00ln.ft.
$30.00sq. yard
32 Required
212 Required
$32.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$50,000.00allowance
Sitework Allowance for
$1.50sq.ft.
Unforeseen Circumstances for
buildings between 0 SF and
100,000 SF
Other: Rebuild NE Stairwell
$26,895.00allowance
Sum:
Facility Assessment
Whole
Building
Classroom
Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
96 Required
Classroom
Sum
Comments
Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
478 Required $73,103.40(including drainage / tear out for heavy
duty asphalt)
356 Required 45 Required 223 Required $21,166.00(includes minor crack repair in less than
5% of paved area)
96 Required 12 Required 60 Required $33,000.00(Number of students should be
rounded up to the nearest 100. $5500
per bus; 40 students per bus; 80% of
elementary school students riding)
8 Required
8 Required
$2,064.00
154 Required 19 Required 96 Required $14,430.00
62 Required
$1,984.00
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
Required
$279,051.40 $167,582.10
$50,000.00Include this and one of the next two.
(Applies for whole building, so only one
addition should have this item)
$56,409.00Include this one or the next. (Each
addition should have this item)
$26,895.00Rebuild NE stairwell to include installing
new catch basin and storm drainage.
$63,706.90
Page 31
$8,072.60
$39,689.80
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Asphalt Pavement at Hard Surface Play Area
Playground Equipment
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 32
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
Q. Sewage System
Description:
The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the city system, and is in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the school
district or noted during the physical assessment.
Rating:
1 Satisfactory
Recommendations:
Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1927)Classroom Addition (1946)Classroom Addition (1950)Classroom Addition (1956)SumComments
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
Sum:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Sanitary Waste Piping
Kitchen Grease Trap Interceptor
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 33
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
R. Water Supply
Description:
The domestic water supply system is tied in to the city system, features 2" service and 1 1/2" water meter, and is in fair condition. The District was
not able to provide water supply flow test data. The existing domestic water service appears to meet the facility’s current needs. The facility is not
equipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The
domestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system does not provide adequate pressure and
capacity for the future needs of the school.
Rating:
1 Satisfactory
Recommendations:
Provide a new city water supply line of adequate capacity to support the existing needs of the facility, as well as a future automated fire
suppression system. Funding provided in Item U.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1927)Classroom Addition (1946)Classroom Addition (1950)Classroom Addition (1956)SumComments
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
Sum:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Incoming Domestic Water Service Line
Incoming Domestic Water Service Meter
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 34
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
S. Exterior Doors
Description:
Typical exterior doors in the overall facility are hollow metal, installed on hollow metal frames, and are in fair condition. Typical exterior hollow
metal doors feature no vision panels. Entrance door in the 1927 Original Construction is wood type construction, installed on wood frame, and in
fair condition. Entrance doors in the 1946, 1950 and 1956 Additions are FRP type construction, installed on aluminum frames, and in good
condition. The main entry door in the 1927 Original Construction features single pane glazed tempered vision panels. Entrance doors in the 1946,
1950 and 1956 Additions feature insulated tempered vision panels. There are no overhead doors in the facility.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Replace all exterior hollow metal doors, due to poor condition. Replace exterior wood entry door in the 1927 Original Construction, due to
condition. Replacement of single glazed transoms and sidelights is addressed in Item F. Replace fire door identified in item T.
Item
Cost
Unit
Whole
Building
Door Leaf/Frame and $2,000.00per
Hardware:
leaf
Fire Door Replacement $1,100.00each
Sum:
Original Construction Classroom Addition Classroom Addition Classroom Addition Sum
Comments
(1927)
(1946)
(1950)
(1956)
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
2 Required
3 Required
$10,000.00(includes removal of existing)
1 Required
$11,100.00 $5,100.00
$1,100.00(Hazardous Material
Replacement Cost - See T.)
$6,000.00
Wood Entry Door in the 1927 Original Construction
$0.00
$0.00
Hollow Metal Doors in the 1946 Addition
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 35
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
T. Hazardous Material
Description:
The School District did not provide an AHERA three year reinspection reports, or other documents regarding hazardous materials. An Enhanced
Environmental Hazards Assessment (EEHA) will need to be conducted in order to establish abatement budgets. (Vinyl asbestos floor tile and
mastic, hard plaster, and fire doors containing hazardous materials are located in the overall facility in fair to poor condition. These materials were
open to observation and found to be in friable and non-friable condition with moderate damage. There are no underground storage tanks on the
site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the overall facility, as noted in the attached Environmental Hazards
Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.
Item
Cost
Environmental Hazards Form
Estimated Cost For Abatement
Contractor to Perform Lead
Mock-Ups
Special Engineering Fees for LBP
Mock-Ups
Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Recycling/Incineration
Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in
Walls/Ceilings)
Dismantling of
Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
Hard Plaster Removal
Fire Door Removal
Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for
access)
Resilient Flooring Removal, Including
Mastic
Sink Undercoating Removal
Other: EHA Other Hazard
Sum:
Unit
Whole
Building
$1.00per
unit
$1.00per
unit
$0.10sq.ft.
(Qty)
$15.00ln.ft.
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
EEHA Form
5,000 Required
Classroom
Classroom
Addition (1946) Addition
12,027 ft²
(1950)
1,364 ft²
EEHA Form
EEHA Form
0 Required
0 Required
$7.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$100.00each
$2.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$3.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
$100.00each
$1.00per
unit
Comments
EEHA Form
0 Required
—
$5,000.00
0 Required
$5,000.00
16,651 Required 12,027
1,364
Required
Required
350 Required 250 Required 30 Required
7,564 Required
$3,760.60
2 Required
5,000 Required 0 Required
$2,000.00each
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1956)
7,564 ft²
0 Required
200 Required
0 Required
0 Required
0 Required
50,000 Required 0 Required
0 Required
0 Required
2 Required
0 Required
0 Required
0 Required
1,400 Required 1,000 Required120 Required 800 Required
10,000 Required 9,100 Required1,364
Required
0 Required
5 Required
0 Required
3,000 Required
$468,642.60 $406,915.10
$34,752.70
Fire Door in the Corridor
$4,918.40
$12,450.00
$4,000.00
$350,000.00See J
$200.00See S
$6,640.00See J
5,400 Required $77,592.00See J
5 Required
$1,000.00
$3,000.00XRF testing for lead-based paint is
recommended for compliance with
EPA’s RRP Program.
$22,056.40
VAT in the Classrooms
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 36
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
U. Life Safety
Description:
The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are not
present. The facility features four (4) interior stair towers, which are not protected by a two hour fire enclosure. The facility does not have any
exterior stairways from intermediate floors. Handrails do not extend past the top and bottom stair risers as required by the Ohio Building Code.
Guardrails are constructed with vertical bars with more than 4’’ clearance. The Kitchen hood is in poor condition, and is not equipped with the
required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang of the cooking equipment is not provided by the
hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is not of proper construction, material, and insulation and was not installed as required by the OSDM and
OBCMC. The cooking equipment is not interlocked to shut down in the event of discharge of the fire suppression system. Fire extinguishers are
not provided in sufficient quantity. Existing fire extinguishers are inadequately spaced. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator.
The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the city system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school.
Rooms with a capacity greater than 50 occupants are equipped with adequate egress.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines and to include fire protection of the wood roof
structure and deck located over the overall facility. Provide increased water service of a capacity sufficient to support the fire suppression system,
with funding included in fire suppression funding. Provide new emergency generator, with funding provided via complete replacement of electrical
system in Item D. Provide new handrails to meet the requirements of the Ohio Building Code. Provide new guardrails to meet the requirements of
the Ohio Building Code. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair towers. Rework existing non-compliant stair tower. Provide additional
wall cabinets and fire extinguishers. Provide the new Kitchen hood with a UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system, with funding
provided in Item J. Provide the interlock to de-energize cooking equipment upon discharge of the Kitchen hood fire suppression system, with
funding provided in Item J. 10-02-14 Update: Existing 2" water service not sufficient to support sprinkler system. Provide new water service for
fire protection. 1-1/2" water meter will need to be increased in size to meet fire protection flow requirements. Replace water meter. Code
requirement to provide UL rated assembly on 1927 Original Building wood roof trusses. Add budget to provide UL rated assembly on 1927
Original Building roof Trusses. Revise fire suppression for wood trusses from 100 sf to 2,047 sf.
Item
Cost
Unit
Sprinkler / Fire
$3.20sq.ft.
Suppression System:
(Qty)
New Exterior Stair
$42,500.00per
Enclosure
level
Demo of existing stairway: $12,000.00per
level
Water Main
Handrails:
Provide Fire Extinguisher
and Wall Cabinet:
Other: Fire Suppression
System for Wood Roof
Structure
Other: Handrails /
Guardrails
Other: New Water Meter
Other: Provide UL Fire
Rated Assembly on Wood
Trusses
Sum:
Facility Assessment
$40.00ln.ft.
$5,000.00level
$585.00each
$3.25sq.ft.
(Qty)
Whole
Building
Original
Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
16,651 Required
Classroom
Classroom
Classroom
Sum
Addition (1946) Addition (1950) Addition (1956)
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
12,027
Required
1,364 Required 7,564 Required $120,339.20(includes increase of service piping, if
required)
2 Required
$170,000.00(all inclusive)
2 Required
2 Required
200 Required
2 Required
2 Required
2 Required
1 Required
2,047 Required
$34.50ln.ft.
$2,100.00each
$6.00sq.ft.
(Qty)
25 Required
1 Required
2,047 Required
$365,991.45 $202,487.95
Comments
$38,486.40
$4,364.80
Page 37
$24,000.00(per stairway, two floor minimum $12,000,
includes demo and floor construction, see
coordination comment)
$8,000.00(new)
$20,000.00
$1,755.00(includes preparation of wall to receive
recessed cabinet)
$6,652.75Provide a fire suppression system for the
wood roof structure.
$862.50Provide new guardrails to meet the
requirements of the Ohio Building Code.
$2,100.00Provide new water meter to allow for
adequate flow for new fire suppression
system.
$12,282.00Provide UL Fire Rated Assembly on
Wood Trusses
$120,652.30
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Non-compliant Guardrails
Non-compliant Handrail
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 38
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
V. Loose Furnishings
Description:
The typical Classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair to poor condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desks &
chairs, desk height file cabinets, reading tables, computer workstations, bookcases, and wastebaskets. The facility’s furniture and loose
equipment were evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the overall facility received a rating of 2 due
to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1927)Classroom Addition (1946)Classroom Addition (1950)Classroom Addition (1956)Sum
Comments
16,651 ft²
12,027 ft²
1,364 ft²
7,564 ft²
CEFPI Rating 0 to 3$5.00sq.ft.
Required
Required
Required
Required
$188,030.00
Sum:
$188,030.00 $83,255.00
$60,135.00
$6,820.00
$37,820.00
Typical Teacher Desk
Computer Work Stations
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 39
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
W. Technology
Description:
The typical Classroom is equipped with one of the required four technology data ports for student use, one voice port with a digitally based phone
system, one cable port and monitor, and a 2-way PA system that can be initiated only by the Main Office to meet Ohio School Design Manual
requirements. The majority of the Classrooms have an Infrared Classroom Amplification Technology systems. Two Classrooms have smart
boards and wall mounted projection units. The typical Classroom is not equipped with three of the required four technology data ports for student
use, one data port for teacher use, and a 2-way PA system that can be initiated by either party to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.
The facility is equipped with an outdated centralized clock system that is only used to run the school bell system. Specialized electrical / sound
system requirements of Gymnasium, Stage, Student Dining, and Music spaces are inadequately provided, and in poor condition.
OSDM-compliant computer network infrastructure is not provided. The facility does not contain a Media Distribution Center, and does not provide
Computer Labs for use by students.
Rating:
3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations:
Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.
Item
Cost
Unit
ES portion of building with total
SF < 50,000
Sum:
$13.18sq.ft.
(Qty)
Whole
Building
Original Construction
(1927)
16,651 ft²
16,651 Required
$495,647.08 $219,460.18
Classroom Addition
(1946)
12,027 ft²
12,027 Required
Classroom Addition
(1950)
1,364 ft²
1,364 Required
Classroom Addition
(1956)
7,564 ft²
7,564 Required
$158,515.86
$17,977.52
$99,693.52
Typical Classroom Teacher and Student Computers
Sum
Comments
$495,647.08
Infrared Classroom Amplification Technology System
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 40
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Facility Assessment
X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost
Renovation Costs (A-W)
7.00%
$6,745,152.18
Construction Contingency
Subtotal
16.29%
$472,160.65
$7,217,312.83
Non-Construction Costs
Total Project
$1,175,700.26
$8,393,013.09
Construction Contingency
$472,160.65
Non-Construction Costs
$1,175,700.26
Total for X.
$1,647,860.91
Non-Construction Costs Breakdown
Land Survey
0.03%
$2,165.19
Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report
0.10%
$7,217.31
Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code)
0.25%
$18,043.28
Construction Testing
0.40%
$28,869.25
Printing - Bid Documents
0.15%
$10,825.97
Advertising for Bids
0.02%
$1,443.46
Builder’s Risk Insurance
0.12%
$8,660.78
Design Professional’s Compensation
7.50%
$541,298.46
CM Compensation
6.00%
$433,038.77
Commissioning
0.60%
$43,303.88
Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services)
1.12%
$80,833.90
16.29%
$1,175,700.26
Total Non-Construction Costs
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 41
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
School Facility Appraisal
Name of Appraiser
Dave Gandee
Building Name
Silver Lake Elementary
Street Address
2970 Overlook Road
City/Town, State, Zip Code
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44224
Telephone Number(s)
(330) 920-3632
School District
Cuyahoga Falls City
Setting:
Suburban
Date of Appraisal
2015-01-06
Site-Acreage
7.50
Building Square Footage
37,606
Grades Housed
K-5
Student Capacity
301
Number of Teaching Stations
20
Number of Floors
2
Student Enrollment
251
Dates of Construction
1927,1946,1950,1956
Energy Sources:
Fuel Oil
Gas
Electric
Solar
Air Conditioning:
Roof Top
Windows Units
Central
Room Units
Heating:
Central
Roof Top
Individual Unit
Forced Air
Hot Water
Steam
Type of Construction
Exterior Surfacing
Floor Construction
Load bearing masonry
Brick
Wood Joists
Steel frame
Stucco
Steel Joists
Concrete frame
Metal
Slab on grade
Wood
Wood
Structural slab
Steel Joists
Stone
Back to Assessment Summary
School Facility Appraisal
Page 42
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
1.0 The School Site
School Facility Appraisal
Points Allocated
1.1
Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements
Points
25
10
20
16
10
8
10
8
The site is 7.5 acres compared to 13 acres recommended by the OSDM.
1.2
Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population
The School is centrally located within the district that it serves, and is easily accessible.
1.3
Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards
The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the School site.
1.4
Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs
The site is generously landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance. Lawn
areas where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope.
1.5
ES
Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas
MS
Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking
HS
Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking
10
8
Playground areas consist of coated steel and high density plastic type play equipment, which is in good to fair condition, and is located on pea gravel or solid rubber
play surface, which is not an approved soft surface material. Play equipment is ADA accessible, and includes an accessible route to equipment. Fencing is not
provided. The Playgrounds are seperate for vehicular traffic by curbing and sidewalks.
1.6
Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines
5
4
The site is gently sloped to provide positive drainage across the site. A flat area is provided to accommodate buildings, perimeter walks, vehicular circulation,
parking areas, outdoor play areas, and physical education spaces, and is desirable.
1.7
Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion
5
4
5
4
5
4
Soils appear to be stable and well drained, and no erosion was observed.
1.8
Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning
The site has been developed to accommodate outdoor learning, including benches and picnic tables to facilitate instruction.
1.9
Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and
correct slopes
Sidewalks are adequately provided to accommodate safe pedestrian circulation including designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes.
1.10
ES/MS
Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided
HS
Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community
5
4
Adequate parking is provided for faculty, staff, and community parking, and is located on asphalt pavement in fair condition.
TOTAL - The School Site
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
100
Page 43
70
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 44
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features
School Facility Appraisal
Structural
2.1
Points Allocated
Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally
Points
15
9
15
8
10
8
10
8
Entire building is not ADA-compliant.
2.2
Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight
The roofs over the entire building require replacement.
2.3
Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks
Foundations are in fair condition with an observable area of settlement.
2.4
Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration
Exterior and interior walls are in good to fair condition. Some masonry repair work is required and all masonry surfaces require cleaning and sealing.
2.5
Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow
10
8
10
8
10
4
10
4
Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.
2.6
Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria)
Building envelope meets minimum energy conservation requirements.
2.7
Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials
The building is assumed to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials.
2.8
Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes
Interior walls throughout the facility are fixed walls and are not flexible.
Mechanical/Electrical
2.9
Points Allocated
Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating
15
Points
4
Light sources are improperly placed and provide inadequate lighting in some areas. Fixtures are poorly maintained in some areas. Light fixtures do not appear to be
subject to overheating.
2.10
Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements
15
6
15
4
Internal water supply will not support a future fire suppression system, but appears to be adequate for current requirements.
2.11
Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology
applications
Classrooms have an inadequate number of outlets and data jacks for technology applications.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 45
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
2.12
Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible
10
2
10
6
Disconnect switches are not adequately provided to allow for safe servicing of equipment.
2.13
Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for
the disabled
Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and meet ADA requirements. Drinking fountains are not properly maintained.
2.14
Number and size of restrooms meet requirements
10
8
10
2
The number and size of Restrooms meet requirements.
2.15
Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements
Drainage systems for the overall facility, consisting of sanitary waste piping, are cast iron and galvanized, are original to each addition, exhibit some signs of leaking
and are in fair condition.
2.16
Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements
10
2
10
4
The fire alarm system does not meet requirements. Smoke detectors are inadequately provided. The facility is not sprinkled.
2.17
Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between
the office and instructional areas
The central intercommunication system provides unreliable two-way communication between the Administration area and all teaching areas, can only be initiated by
the Main Office, and is outdated. Equipment such as speakers, are in fair condition. Telephone system is used as an alternate method of communication with the
office.
2.18
Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage
5
2
Exterior wall hydrants are inadequately provided around the exterior of the facility.
TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features
200
97
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 46
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
3.0 Plant Maintainability
School Facility Appraisal
Points Allocated
3.1
Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance
Points
15
12
15
9
Exterior materials and finishes for doors, windows and walls are durable and require minimal maintenance.
3.2
Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care
Flooring throughout the facility consists of VCT, VAT, wood, terrazzo, and carpet, which is somewhat well maintained throughout the facility.
3.3
Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain
10
6
10
4
10
6
10
2
10
8
10
2
10
4
Acoustical tile ceilings and plaster walls are not easily cleaned or resistant to stain. Glazed block is easily cleaned and resistant to stain.
3.4
Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance
Casework is wood type construction that is original to the building, and is in poor condition.
3.5
Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality
Door hardware varies throughout the facility, does not meet ADA requirements, and keying systems are worn.
3.6
Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish
Fixtures are floor and wall mounted and are of fair to poor quality.
3.7
Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building
Custodial storage space is adequately located throughout the facility, including provisions for water and drains.
3.8
Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area
Electrical outlets are inadequately provided in Corridors and do not allow for convenient routine cleaning.
3.9
Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement
Outdoor light fixtures are inadequately provided, but are accessible for repair and replacement. Electrical outlets are inadequately provided around the exterior of the
facility.
TOTAL - Plant Maintainability
100
53
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 47
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
4.0 Building Safety and Security
School Facility Appraisal
Site Safety
4.1
Points Allocated
Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways
Points
15
6
10
8
5
4
5
2
5
3
Student loading occurs in the street, and is not separated from other vehicular traffic.
4.2
Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians
Walkways are adequately provided both on and off-site for pedestrian safety.
4.3
Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area
School signs and signals are located as required on adjacent access streets.
4.4
Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow
Student loading occurs in the street, and is not separated from other vehicular traffic.
4.5
ES
Playground equipment is free from hazard
MS
Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard
HS
Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard
Playground equipment consists of plastic coated steel and high density plastic type equipment in good to fair condition, appears to be free from hazard, and is not
located on an approved soft surface material.
Building Safety
4.6
Points Allocated
The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas
20
Points
10
Heating boilers are located in rooms that are not accessible by students. Unit ventilators and radiators are located in the Classrooms and other learning areas.
4.7
Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress
15
9
10
8
10
2
The building does have 4 stairways, which are not enclosed, and are not ADA and OBC compliant.
4.8
Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware
Exterior doors open in the direction of travel and are equipped with panic hardware.
4.9
Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits
Exit signs are on separate circuits but are inadequately provided. The facility is inadequately equipped with emergency egress light fixtures. The facility is not
equipped with an emergency generator.
4.10
Classroom doors are recessed and open outward
10
6
Classroom doors are recessed from the Corridor in the Additions and open outward without proper ADA clearances, but do not impede traffic flow in the Corridors.
4.11
Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 48
10
2
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Security systems are inadequately provided and are in fair condition.
4.12
Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition
5
4
5
3
VCT, VAT, Terrazzo, Carpet, and wood parquet flooring have been well maintained throughout the facility.
4.13
Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16
Stair treads and risers are properly designed and meet requirements. Stair risers exceed exceed 7 inches permitted by the OBC at the South exterior door.
4.14
Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury
5
3
5
4
There is no glass in the interior door systems.
4.15
Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall
Drinking fountains and electric water coolers are semi-recessed and flush mounted, extend more than eight inches from the Corridor wall, but do not impede traffic
flow in the Corridors.
4.16
Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress
5
5
Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.
Emergency Safety
4.17
Points Allocated
Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located
Points
15
2
15
8
15
9
15
4
The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm devices are not provided adequately. Fire extinguishers are inadequately provided.
4.18
There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building
There are no dead-end Corridors in the building.
4.19
Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure
The exterior walls are a masonry load bearing system. Wood rafters are located at roof of the 1927 Original Construction.
4.20
Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided
The fire alarm is equipped with automatic actuation devices and is not provided with adequate visual indicating devices.
TOTAL - Building Safety and Security
200
102
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 49
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
5.0 Educational Adequacy
School Facility Appraisal
Academic Learning Space
5.1
Points Allocated
Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards
25
Points
15
The average Classroom in the 1927 Original Construction is 580 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM. The average Classroom in the 1946, 1950, and
1956 Addition is 792 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM.
5.2
Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity
15
9
10
8
10
4
10
4
10
8
Undersized Classrooms do not allow sufficient space for effective small group activities.
5.3
Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive
noise
The Gymnasium and Music program are properly isolated from the academic learning areas to reduce distractions.
5.4
Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students
Undersized Classrooms do not permit privacy time for individual students.
5.5
Storage for student materials is adequate
Coat hooks and shelving, located in the Classroom, are inadequately provided for student storage.
5.6
Storage for teacher materials is adequate
Casework is adequately provided for storage of teacher materials.
Special Learning Space
5.7
Points Allocated
Size of special learning area(s) meets standards
15
Points
9
The Special Education Classroom is 755 SF compared to 900 SF recommended in the OSDM. Special Education Classrooms are undersized compared to
standards.
5.8
Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need
10
4
10
8
5
2
10
4
Special Education spaces are not adequately provided to meet instructional needs.
5.9
Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space
The Media Center is 913 SF compared to 879 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.10
Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction
The Gymnasium is 2,690 SF compared to 3,500-5,000 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.11
ES
Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction
MS/HS
Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 50
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Kindergarten spaces are undersized, and do not provide adequate instruction space.
5.12
Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space
5
2
The Music Room is 424 SF compared to 1,800-3,000 recommended in the OSDM. Music instruction is provided in a standard Classroom without any sound
treatment.
5.13
Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment
5
2
The Art Room is 1,088 SF compared to 1,200 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Art Room is undersized and does not provide sufficient space for storage of
supplies and equipment.
School Facility Appraisal
5.14
Points Allocated
Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment
Points
5
0
5
2
5
3
The facility is not provided with Computer Labs for student use.
5.15
Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms
No spaces have been provided adjacent to Classrooms for small groups or remedial instruction.
5.16
Storage for student and teacher material is adequate
Storage for students has not been adequately provided throughout the facility. Casework has been adequately provided for storage of teacher materials.
Support Space
5.17
Points Allocated
Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals
Points
10
8
10
4
The Teacher’s Lounge is 917 SF compared to 450-900 SF, for 8-24 staff, recommended in the OSDM.
5.18
Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food
preparation
The Kitchen space is 772 SF compared to 879 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Student Dining space is 1,317 SF compared to 3,000 SF recommended in the
OSDM. The Student Dining space has limited visual appeal with limited seating capacity.
5.19
Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the
students served
5
2
5
1
5
1
5
2
5
1
Administrative Offices are not adequately provided for Elementary School students.
5.20
Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage
There is no dedicated Counselor’s Office in this facility.
5.21
Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements
The Clinic is 126 SF compared to 370 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.22
Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors
Reception space consists of approximately 143 SF compared to 200-400 SF recommended by the OSDM.
5.23
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy
Page 51
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
The Administrative area consists of approximately 598 SF for the principal, assistant principal, secretary, Conference Room, Storage, Copy Room, and Restroom,
compared to 2,600 SF recommended by the OSDM.
TOTAL - Educational Adequacy
200
103
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 52
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
6.0 Environment for Education
School Facility Appraisal
Exterior Environment
6.1
Points Allocated
Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students
Points
15
12
10
8
The building is a historical design with standard detailing, which is aesthetically acceptable.
6.2
Site and building are well landscaped
The site is generously landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance. Lawn
areas where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope.
6.3
Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning
10
8
10
8
5
4
The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the school site.
6.4
Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather
The main entrance to the School is partially sheltered.
6.5
Building materials provide attractive color and texture
Exterior building materials consist of brick and stone, which provides an attractive color and texture.
Interior Environment
6.6
Points Allocated
Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning
20
Points
16
The color palette is comprised of neutral hues with accent colors of more saturated hues. School colors are reflected in the athletic areas. The use of repeated
colors and materials give the building some unity and a sense of consistency, which enhances the learning environment.
6.7
Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building
15
2
15
6
The facility is not air conditioned to provide year-round temperature and humidity control.
6.8
Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement
The ventilating systems do not provide an adequate quantity of ventilation air to the spaces. Ventilation systems introduce minimal noise into the teaching and
learning areas.
6.9
Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination
15
4
The lighting system does not provide proper intensity in some areas. Location of lighting fixtures provides uneven distribution of illumination. Diffusion of illumination
is adequately provided by the light fixture lenses in some areas.
6.10
Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located
15
12
10
8
Drinking fountains and Restroom facilities are conveniently located.
6.11
Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization
There are locations for students to gather in the Student Dining and Gymnasium, as well as gathering areas in the outdoor play areas.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 53
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
6.12
Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors
10
8
10
8
Corridors and Foyers are adequately designed for efficient traffic flow.
6.13
Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group
There are locations for students to gather in the Student Dining and Gymnasium, as well as gathering areas in the outdoor play areas.
6.14
Large group areas are designed for effective management of students
10
7
The Gymnasium and Student Dining space is adequately designed to manage large groups of students, but the Student Dining is in the Basement.
6.15
Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control
10
4
10
8
10
2
Limited consideration has been given to acoustical treatment of Classrooms and Corridors.
6.16
Window design contributes to a pleasant environment
The windows are well designed and contribute to a pleasant environment.
6.17
Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere
Classroom furniture is mismatched and in fair to poor condition.
TOTAL - Environment for Education
200
125
Back to Assessment Summary
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 54
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
LEED Observation Notes
School District:
Cuyahoga Falls City
County:
Summit
School District IRN:
43836
Building:
Silver Lake Elementary
Building IRN:
34603
Sustainable Sites
Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be
take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helps
to prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits.
Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructed,
it’s important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:9)
Water Efficiency
In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground
aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce water
usage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Not
only do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:65)
Energy & Atmosphere
Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which
releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contribute
to smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nuclear
power creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are
environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also they
will reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, it’s important to adopt a holistic approach to the building’s energy load and
integrate different energy saving strategies.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:93)
Material & Resources
The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural
resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid
wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new
materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products and
local materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources.
Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:167)
Indoor Environmental Quality
As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor
IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants’ health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building
flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategies
involve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:215)
Innovation & Design Process
This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results
exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:271)
<Untitled>
Page 55
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Justification for Allocation of Points
Building Name and Level:
Silver Lake Elementary
K-5
Building features that clearly exceed criteria:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:
1.
The building does not meet ADA requirements.
2.
The building does not contain a fire suppression system.
3.
The building is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials.
4.
5.
6.
Back to Assessment Summary
Justification for Allocation of Points
Page 56
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
Owner:
Cuyahoga Falls City
Facility:
Silver Lake Elementary
Date of Initial Assessment: Jan 6, 2015
Date of Assessment Update: Jan 22, 2015
Cost Set:
2015
District IRN:
43836
Building IRN:
34603
Firm:
Gandee & Associates, Inc.
Scope remains unchanged after cost updates.
Building Addition
1927 Original Construction
1946 Classroom Addition
1950 Classroom Addition
1956 Classroom Addition
Total
Total with Regional Cost Factor (104.05%)
Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency
<Untitled>
Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
Renovation
Demolition
16,651
$406,915.10
$393,915.10
12,027
$34,752.70
$34,752.70
1,364
$4,918.40
$4,918.40
7,564
$22,056.40
$22,056.40
37,606
$468,642.60
$455,642.60
—
$487,622.63
$474,096.13
—
$606,750.30
$589,919.23
Addition Area (sf)
Page 57
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Original Construction
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Original Construction
Owner:
Cuyahoga Falls City
Facility:
Silver Lake Elementary
Date On-Site:
Bldg. IRN:
BuildingAdd:
2015-01-06
Consultant Name:
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
ACM Found
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal
2. Breeching Insulation Removal
3. Tank Insulation Removal
4. Duct Insulation Removal
5. Pipe Insulation Removal
6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal
7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings)
10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal
12. Acoustical Plaster Removal
13. Fireproofing Removal
14. Hard Plaster Removal
15. Gypsum Board Removal
16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal
17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal
18. Cement Board Removal
19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal
20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal
21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal
22. Fire Door Removal
23. Door and Window Panel Removal
24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel
25. Soil Removal
26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access)
27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo
28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only
29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic
30. Carpet Mastic Removal
31. Carpet Removal (over RFC)
32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal
33. Sink Undercoating Removal
34. Roofing Removal
35. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
36. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
34603
Original Construction
Gandee & Associates, Inc.
AFM=Asbestos Free Material
Status
Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$20.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$12.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$30.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
350
$15.00
$5,250.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
2
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$25.00
$0.00
Reported Asbestos-Containing Material
50000
$7.00
$350,000.00
Not Present
0
$6.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$5.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$50.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$4.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
2
$100.00
$200.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$150.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
1400
$2.00
$2,800.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported Asbestos-Containing Material
10000
$3.00
$30,000.00
Not Present
0
$2.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$2.00
$0.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work
$392,250.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
$392,250.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Tank No.
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)
None Reported
Location
Age
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only
1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups
2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups
3. (Sum of Lines 1-2)
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration
Area Of Building Addition
1.
16651
16651
Product Stored
Size
Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
$0.00
Addition Constructed after 1980
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups
$10,000.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost
$0.10
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks
1.
2.
3.
4.
Est.Rem.Cost
None Reported
Cost Estimate
$0.00
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$0.00
Description
See Bulk Sample Record Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, & 10 for sampling results in this addition.
XRF testing for lead-based paint is recommended for compliance with EPA’s RRP Program.
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries
1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E3
2. A36, B1, D1, and E4
Not Applicable
Total Cost
$1,665.10
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$406,915.10
$393,915.10
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,
acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 58
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Owner:
Cuyahoga Falls City
Facility:
Silver Lake Elementary
Date On-Site:
Bldg. IRN:
BuildingAdd:
2015-01-06
Consultant Name:
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
ACM Found
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal
2. Breeching Insulation Removal
3. Tank Insulation Removal
4. Duct Insulation Removal
5. Pipe Insulation Removal
6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal
7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings)
10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal
12. Acoustical Plaster Removal
13. Fireproofing Removal
14. Hard Plaster Removal
15. Gypsum Board Removal
16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal
17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal
18. Cement Board Removal
19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal
20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal
21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal
22. Fire Door Removal
23. Door and Window Panel Removal
24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel
25. Soil Removal
26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access)
27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo
28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only
29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic
30. Carpet Mastic Removal
31. Carpet Removal (over RFC)
32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal
33. Sink Undercoating Removal
34. Roofing Removal
35. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
36. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
34603
Classroom Addition
Gandee & Associates, Inc.
AFM=Asbestos Free Material
Status
Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$20.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$12.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$30.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
250
$15.00
$3,750.00
Not Present
0
$2,000.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$25.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$7.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$6.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$5.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$50.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$4.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$150.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
1000
$2.00
$2,000.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported Asbestos-Containing Material
9100
$3.00
$27,300.00
Not Present
0
$2.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
5
$100.00
$500.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$2.00
$0.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work
$33,550.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
$33,550.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Tank No.
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)
None Reported
Location
Age
Product Stored
Size
Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only
1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups
2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups
3. (Sum of Lines 1-2)
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration
Area Of Building Addition
1.
12027
12027
$0.00
Addition Constructed after 1980
$0.00
$0.00
Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups
$0.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost
$0.10
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks
1.
2.
3.
4.
Est.Rem.Cost
None Reported
Cost Estimate
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Description
Costs for lead-based paint mock-ups are included in assessment for 1927 (Original Construction).
See Bulk Sample Record Nos. 1, 3, 8, 9, & 10 for sampling results in this addition.
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries
1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E3
2. A36, B1, D1, and E4
Not Applicable
Total Cost
$1,202.70
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$34,752.70
$34,752.70
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,
acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 59
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Owner:
Cuyahoga Falls City
Facility:
Silver Lake Elementary
Date On-Site:
Bldg. IRN:
BuildingAdd:
2015-01-06
Consultant Name:
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
ACM Found
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal
2. Breeching Insulation Removal
3. Tank Insulation Removal
4. Duct Insulation Removal
5. Pipe Insulation Removal
6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal
7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings)
10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal
12. Acoustical Plaster Removal
13. Fireproofing Removal
14. Hard Plaster Removal
15. Gypsum Board Removal
16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal
17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal
18. Cement Board Removal
19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal
20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal
21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal
22. Fire Door Removal
23. Door and Window Panel Removal
24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel
25. Soil Removal
26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access)
27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo
28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only
29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic
30. Carpet Mastic Removal
31. Carpet Removal (over RFC)
32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal
33. Sink Undercoating Removal
34. Roofing Removal
35. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
36. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
34603
Classroom Addition
Gandee & Associates, Inc.
AFM=Asbestos Free Material
Status
Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$20.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$12.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$30.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
30
$15.00
$450.00
Not Present
0
$2,000.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$25.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$6.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$5.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$50.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$4.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$150.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
120
$2.00
$240.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported Asbestos-Containing Material
1364
$3.00
$4,092.00
Not Present
0
$2.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$2.00
$0.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work
$4,782.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
$4,782.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Tank No.
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)
None Reported
Location
Age
Product Stored
Size
Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only
1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups
2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups
3. (Sum of Lines 1-2)
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration
Area Of Building Addition
1.
1364
1364
Est.Rem.Cost
$0.00
Addition Constructed after 1980
$0.00
$0.00
Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups
$0.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost
$0.10
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks
1.
2.
3.
4.
None Reported
Cost Estimate
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Description
Costs for lead-based paint mock-ups are included in assessment for 1927 (Original Construction).
See Bulk Sample Record Nos. 1, 8, & 10 for sampling results in this addition.
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries
1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E3
2. A36, B1, D1, and E4
Not Applicable
Total Cost
$136.40
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$4,918.40
$4,918.40
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,
acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 60
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Cuyahoga Falls City (43836) - Silver Lake Elementary (34603) - Classroom Addition
Owner:
Cuyahoga Falls City
Facility:
Silver Lake Elementary
Date On-Site:
Bldg. IRN:
BuildingAdd:
2015-01-06
Consultant Name:
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM)
ACM Found
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal
2. Breeching Insulation Removal
3. Tank Insulation Removal
4. Duct Insulation Removal
5. Pipe Insulation Removal
6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal
7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel)
9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings)
10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal
12. Acoustical Plaster Removal
13. Fireproofing Removal
14. Hard Plaster Removal
15. Gypsum Board Removal
16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal
17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal
18. Cement Board Removal
19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal
20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal
21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal
22. Fire Door Removal
23. Door and Window Panel Removal
24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel
25. Soil Removal
26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access)
27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo
28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only
29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic
30. Carpet Mastic Removal
31. Carpet Removal (over RFC)
32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal
33. Sink Undercoating Removal
34. Roofing Removal
35. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
36. (Sum of Lines 1-34)
34603
Classroom Addition
Gandee & Associates, Inc.
AFM=Asbestos Free Material
Status
Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$8.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$10.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$20.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$12.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$30.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
200
$15.00
$3,000.00
Not Present
0
$2,000.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$25.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$7.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$6.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$5.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$50.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$4.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$100.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$150.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
800
$2.00
$1,600.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$300.00
$0.00
Reported Asbestos-Containing Material
5400
$3.00
$16,200.00
Not Present
0
$2.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$1.00
$0.00
Not Present
0
$3.00
$0.00
Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material
5
$100.00
$500.00
Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material
0
$2.00
$0.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work
$21,300.00
Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
$21,300.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Tank No.
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0)
None Reported
Location
Age
Product Stored
Size
Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only
1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups
2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups
3. (Sum of Lines 1-2)
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration
Area Of Building Addition
1.
7564
7564
$0.00
Addition Constructed after 1980
$0.00
$0.00
Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups
$0.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost
$0.10
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks
1.
2.
3.
4.
Est.Rem.Cost
None Reported
Cost Estimate
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Description
Costs for lead-based paint mock-ups are included in assessment for 1927 (Original Construction).
See Bulk Sample Record Nos. 1, 2, 7, & 10 for sampling results in this addition.
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation
(Sum of Lines 1-2)
Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries
1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E3
2. A36, B1, D1, and E4
Not Applicable
Total Cost
$756.40
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$22,056.40
$22,056.40
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,
acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c.
Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 61
Report Generated at 21 Jul 2015 13:11