Haemodynamics: CardiacCardiac Haemodynamics: Next Step in Next Step Fetal Monitoring FetalinMonitoring Dr IE Bhorat MBChB(Ntl), B.SC (UDW), DA (SA), Dip Mid COG (SA), FCOG (SA), PhD. Subspecialist: Fetal –Maternal Medicine Head: Fetal Medicine, Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Durban, South Africa Outline of of Presentation Presentation Outline • 1. Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes, IUGR and PET –> Different pathways Link to Cardiac Dysfunction • 2. Methodologies and Techniques to Assess Fetal Cardiac Function: Mod MPI and E/A ratio • 3. Studies Supporting Use of Functional Cardiac Assessment - ? Integration in Routine Fetal Assessment Pathophysiology Pathophysiology of Diabetic Pregnancy Diabetic Pregnancy • Maternal hyperglycaemia • fetal hyperglycaemia • fetal pancreatic hyperplasia • fetal hyperinsulinaemia • macrosomia Pathophysiology Pathopysiology – Diabetic Pregnancy Diabetic Pregnancy • Fetal hyperinsulinaemia increased glucose oxidation + oxygen consumption • fetus has reduced capacity for oxidative metabolism and low pyruvate dehydrogenase activity • when capacity is reached anaerobic metabolism lacticaemia fetal acidosis death • Bradley and Salvesan (early 90’s) –cordocentesis - fetuses of diabetic pregnancies SIGNIFICANT ACIDEMIA AND HYPERLACTICAEMIA IN ABSENCE OF HYPOXAEMIA - offers an explanation of so-called “unexplained” fetal deaths consequence of increased metabolic rate • DIABETES: Concept of: ACIDOSIS IN ABSENCE OF HYPOXIA • Implications for antenatal surveillance Gestational Diabetes Diabetes Gestational • Macrosomia • Increased metabolic demand • Larger vascular cross sections • FETO-MATERNAL METABOLIC PROBLEM AND NOT A PLACENTAL PROBLEM Gestational Diabetes Diabetes Gestational • What antenatal tools do we presently have in fetal surveillance? • Umbilical Artery Doppler velocimetry – widely used method of antenatal surveillance in high risk pregnancies including diabetic pregnancies. • But what does Umbilical Artery Doppler velocimetry measure?- resistance to placental blood flow Gestational Diabetes Diabetes Gestational • Most of our conventional antenatal surveillance techniques – Umbilical artery PI/RI, Middle cerebral artery PI/RI and Ductus venosus PIV – revolve around placental insufficiency – NOT THE PROBLEM IN DIABETIC PREGNANCIES • CONCLUSION: NOT APPROPRIATE OR SUFFICIENT AS A MONITORING MODEL IN DIABETES. • What about cardiac dysfunction? Literature Survey Literature Literature: Cardiac Haemodynamics: • 1. Fetal interventricular septal thickness increases – alterations in diastole (occur even in well controlled diabetics)-Rizzo G et al – (1991) • 2. Impaired ventricular compliance in fetuses of diabetic pregnancie Rizzo G et al (1994), Weiner Z et al (1999) • 3. LV and RV hypertrophy – Weiner et al • 4. Hypertrophic CMO • 5. Increased Preload Index in IVC – associated with lower pH at birth and polycythaemia – Nicolaides KH et al • 6. Abnormal metabolism – direct cardiac effect on function Summary Diabetes Summary –Gestational Gestational Diabetes • 1. Pathophysiology – metabolic problem and not placental insufficiency. • 2. Acidosis in absence of hypoxia • 3. Fetal monitoring models revolve –hypoxia detection • 4. Evidence of cardiac dysfunction • 5. Possible –channel cardiac dysfunction into a monitoring model Early Early Onset Onset IUGR IUGR • Fetal growth impairment • Oligohydramnios • Good fetal monitoring models • Haemodynamic changes: alterations flow velocities in UA, MCA, DV, AoI Doppler IUGR IUGR • Ductus venosus and Aortic Isthmus – Late Doppler changes – cascade of deterioration • DV Doppler anomaly fetal acidosis anomalies in forward flow cardiac haemodynamics. • DV and AoI flow anomalies extrapolations compromised cardiac state Place for Additional Monitoring Place for Additional Monitoring Parameters Parameters • Hypoxia • MCA RI < p5 Tracking myocardial function • Acidosis DV anomalies – myocardial necrosis + late compromised state IUGR IUGR • Pivotal role intrinsic myocardial function Compensatory mechanism of the IUGR fetus establishment of arterial redistribution or Brain –Sparing effect • Direct functional assessment of fetal heart based on pathophysiology clinical value PRE-ECLAMPSIA Pre-Eclampsia • Cardiac dysfunction not conclusively demonstrated in Pre-Eclampsia • Studies not distinguished early from late preeclampsia • Not homogeneous group • Early onset PET –part of Great Obstetric Syndromes EO-PRE-ECLAMPSIA EO-PRE-ECLAMPSIA Placental maladaptation + Vascular Transformation Reduced perfusion Placental Ischaemia ------------------------------------------ PLGF + VEGF / sFLT -1 Vessel Injury + vasoconstriction Increased PVR Increased Fetal Cardiac Afterload Spiral Artery In Junctional Zone Myometrium Classification of Defective Deep Placentation- Brosens et al – Am J Obstet Gynecol :2011 PRE-ECLAMPSIA PRE-ECLAMPSIA • EO-PET >> placental pathological state >> IUGR more serious clinical phenotype • IUGR intrinsic myocardial function pivotal role - compensatory mechanisms • Hypothesise - alterations in cardiac function in PET – Increased Cardiac Afterload • Different Pathophysiologies Cardiac Different Pathophysiologies Dysfunction Cardiac Dysfunction • Diabetes IUGR • Abnormal Metabolic milieu Hypoxia PET LV afterload Cardiac Dysfunction Methodologies Methodologies Myocardial Performance Index E/A ratio Myocardial Performance Performance Index Myocardial Index • The Myocardial Performance Index (MPI) – Tei et al (TEI Index) – in adults to assess ventricular dysfunction (1995) • Ratio between the duration of the isovolumetric periods (composed of 2 periods: contraction and relaxation ie ICT and IRT) and duration of ejection (ET) • MPI= (ICT+IRT)/ET • Tei Index- used in fetus and newborn (Tsutsumi and Ichizuka ) • Valve –click method: Hernandez-Andrade = Mod MPI Myocardial Performance Performance Index Myocardial Index The time cursor is placed at the beginning of each Doppler click. StudiesininFetal FetalMyocardial MyocardialPerformance Performance –– Studies ResearchGroup Group at atUKZN UKZN Research • 1. Reference Ranges of MPI – normograms -5th, 50th and 95th percentiles. • 2. MPI in Diabetes • 3. MPI in IUGR • 4. MPI in Pre-eclampsia 0.30 0.35 MPI 0.40 0.45 Reference Intervals of MPI –normal Reference Intervals of MPI – pregnancies Normal Pregnancies 20 25 30 Gestational age (weeks) 35 40 Reference Intervals of MPI – Normal Reference Intervals of MPI – Pregnancies Normal Pregnancies • Reference intervals of the Mod-MPI evaluating fetal cardiac function have been established. Maturational and developmental alterations in the myocardial performance in utero resulting in better ventricular compliance is most likely responsible for the decreasing trend of the ModMPI noted with advancing gestation. Bhorat I, Bagratee R, Reddy T. Prenatal Diagnosis:2014;34 (11): 1031-1036 Gestational Diabetes Gestational Diabetes • Fetal myocardial performance in Gestational Diabetes and links to perinatal outcome MPIand andGestational Gestational Diabetes MPI Diabetes • To determine whether the MPI is altered in fetuses in pregnancies complicated by severe gestational diabetes (GDM) • To determine whether MPI is of value in fetal surveillance in Diabetic pregnancy • To determine whether MPI is of value in predicting adverse perinatal outcome MPIand andGestational Gestational Diabetes MPI Diabetes 0.5 0.4 0.3 MPI 0.6 0.7 MPI in Controls vs IDDM Control IDDM 0.5 0.4 0.3 MPI 0.6 0.7 Scatterplot of MPI vs Gestational age with linear predictions from quantile regression superimposed. 31 32 33 34 Gestational age (weeks) Control Linear prediction 35 IDDM Linear prediction 36 Outcomes in Study and Control Groups Outcomes Study Group (n=29) Controls (n=29) Stillbirth 1 - Neonatal death 1 - NICU admission 16 - Tachypnoea + pulmonary oedema 8 - Apgar < 7 (5 min) 13 - pH <7.15 13 - Cardiomyopathy 1 - Normal outcome 12 29 Distribution of MPI between normal and abnormal outcomes in the study group and correlation to the 95th percentile of MPI from normal ranges study Results – MPI and Gestational Results Diabetes MPI and Gestational Diabetes All 17 fetuses showing abnormal outcome had: MPI’s > 0.52 - sensitivity of 1 (0.8-1), specificity of 91.67% (0.61-0.998) Additional risk factors: Increased Birthweight and low E/A ratios and increased AFI MPIand andGestational Gestational Diabetes MPI Diabetes • To our knowledge this is the first study to demonstrate a clear relationship between an altered MPI and adverse fetal and neonatal outcome in diabetic pregnancies. Bhorat I, Bagratee J, Pillay M, Reddy T. Prenatal Diagnosis 2014; 34 (13): 1301-1306 IUGR and Fetal Myocardial IUGR and Fetal Myocardial Performance Performance • Question 1: Is MPI altered in IUGR • Question 2: Does MPI correlate with degree of IUGR • Question 3: Is MPI a prognostic indicator of APO? MPI and and IUGR MPI IUGR Question 1: Is MPI altered in IUGR? MPI and and IUGR MPI IUGR Demographic, Sonographic Data and Cardiac Doppler Data between Control and Study Groups Control (n=43) IUGR (n=43) p-value Median (IQR) Median (IQR) Maternal age (mean(SD)) 29.62 (3.61) 29.67(3.59) Gestational age (weeks) 33 (31 -34) 33 (31-34) 1 Gestational age of delivery (mean 39.20 (0.45) 36.76 (1.18) <0.0001 AFI (cm) 12.8 (12.2 - 13.4) 8.95 (7.95 - 10.1) <0.0001 EWF (g) 2214 (1788 – 2436) 1559.5 (1042 - 1897.5) <0.0001 E/A ratio 0.79 0.63 (0.57-0.67) <0.0001 Median MPI (IQR) 0.37 (0.36-0.38) 0.59 (0.52-0.69) <0.001 0.9535 SD) (0.78-08) MPI and and IUGR MPI IUGR • Question 2: Does MPI correlate with degree of IUGR ? Methods Methods • Uncompensated IUGR: AC < 10th percentile for gestational age, elevated umbilical artery RI at > 2 standard deviations for gestational age with no arterial redistribution and normal venous Doppler. • Compensated IUGR had in addition a middle cerebral artery RI below the 5th centile for gestational age reflecting arterial redistribution. • Critical status IUGR: absent (AEDF) or reversed end diastolic flow (RAEDF) in the umbilical artery and/or severe venous Doppler anomalies: high suspicion of acidosis. 0.6 0.5 0.4 MPI 0.7 0.8 Distribution of Mod-MPI in each of the IUGR grades Uncompensated Compensated Critical MPI and and IUGR MPI IUGR • Question 3: Is the MPI a prognostic indicator? Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes IUGR Controls Uncompensated Compensated Critical Number (n) 43 19 10 14 Gest age –mean (delivery) 39w4d (38w3d40w3d) 37w1d (36w37w5d) 35w6d (34w3d36w3d) 30w2d (29w5d32w1d) Median MPI 0.37 (0.36-0.38) 0.52 (0.50-0.54) 0.63 (0.6-0.65) 0.7 (0.7-0.73) Mode of Delivery – C/S (%) 6 35 68 100 Birth Weight (g) 2156 (1890-2314) 1910 (1623-2118) 920 (850-1103) 5-min APGAR <6 3110 (29603476) - 5 6 11 Perinatal Deaths - - 1 4 HIE - - 2 3 Neonatal Resuscit - 5 5 11 Cord pH <7.15 - 1 3 10 IVH - - - 2 BPD - - - 2 Adverse outcome 0% 26% 60% 79% Adverse Perinatal Perinatal Outcome Adverse Outcome • Severity of growth restriction • Prematurity • Cardiac dysfunction (hypoxaemia/acidaemia) • Logistic regression analysis: MPI remained significant predictor for APO –adjusting GA, EFW, UA RI, DV, AFI and E/A ratio: • Adjusted OR 95% CI:2.60 (1.15-5.83), p-0.02 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 MPI and E/A ratio as markers of adverse outcome 0.00 0.25 0.50 1-Specificity MPI AUC: 0.939 Reference 0.75 E/A Ratio AUC: 0.761 1.00 ROC curve: comparing Mod-MPI and DV PIV in prediction of perinatal mortality , both being significant predictors. MPI in in IUGR MPI IUGR • A cut-off Mod-MPI value of 0.54 : sensitivity of 87% (CI:66-97%), specificity of 75%(CI:55-91%) and a likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.47 for an adverse outcome. • A cut-off Mod-MPI value of 0.67 conferred a sensitivity of 100% (CI:54-100%), specificity of 81%(CI:65-92%) and LR of 5.28 for perinatal death. • No abnormal outcomes occurred in controls Bhorat I, Bagratee J, Pillay M, Reddy T. Prenatal Diagnosis: 2015:35(3); 266-273 Conclusion: Conclusion • 1. Link between severity of MPI and adverse outcomes in IUGR. • 2. Cut-off MPI values for adverse outcomes and perinatal death have been suggested. • 3. MPI – allows tracking of cardiovascular deterioration between hypoxia and acidosis. PET and PET andMPI MPI • To determine whether fetuses in severe early onset pre-eclampsia (EO-PET) have cardiac dysfunction • Does MPI deteriorate across stages of increasing placental vascular resistance in PET • Whether this dysfunction influences perinatal outcome. PET and PET andMPI MPI • Question 1: Is MPI altered in severe EO –PET? Results Results Demographic and Sonographic Data and Cardiac Doppler Data Control Group PET (Study) Group p-value Maternal age (years) 28.91 (3.80) 28 95 (3.70) 0.523 Gest age (w) (IQR) 30 (30.57-31.28) 29.98 (30.43-32) 0.454 EWF (g) at assessment 1629 (1597 - 1713) 1214 (913 - 1354) 0.0001 AFI (cm) 12.83 (1.11) 11.46 (3.29) 0.0697 E/A ratio 0.79 (0.02) 0.66 (0.03) <0.0001 Median MOD-MPI (IQR) 0.38 (0.38-0.39) 0.62 (0.54-0.67) <0.001 ICT (ms) 28 (27-29) 35 (34-38) <0.001 IRT (ms) 39 (38-39) 58 (56-64) <0.001 ET (ms) 172 (171-172) 152 (150-156) <0.001 PET and PET andMPI MPI • Question 2: Does MPI alter with deteriorating placental vascular resistance in PET? 0.6 0.5 0.55 MPI 0.65 0.7 Comparison of Mod-MPI values between the 4 levels of severity in Study (PET) Groups 0.7<= UA <0.8 0.8<= UA <0.85 UA>= 0.85 AEDF PET and PET andMPI MPI • Question 3: Is the MPI a prognostic indicator of APO in severe EO-PET? Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes in the Control and Study Groups Control (normals) Median MPI Birth Weight (g) mean Mean Gest age (w) at delivery APGARS <6 (5min) Neonatal death pH <7.15 HIE IVH BPD Perinatal complications N = 30 0.38 (0.38-0.39) Group 1 0.7<=UA < 0.8 N=9 0.54 (0.5-0.58) Group 2 0.8<=UA <0.85 N = 10 0.62 (0.6-0.62) N=5 0.65 (0.6-0.67) Group 4 AEDF/REDF/ Abn DV PIV N=6 0.68 (0.65-0.71) 3085 (2989-3315) 1636 (1465- 1765) 1242 (1023-1356) 1196 (980-1236) 950 (855-1046) 39.2 32w3d 31w3d 30w6d 30w2d 3 5 3 5 - Group 3 RI ≥0.85 - - - 2 3 1 - 2 2 - 2 1 1 4 1 1 - - 33% 50% 60% 83% Adverse Perinatal Perinatal Outcome Adverse Outcome–-PET PET • • • • Worsening placental vascular resistance Prematurity Cardiac dysfunction Logistic regression analysis MPI remained significant predictor after adjusting for gestational age and E/A ratio • Adjusted OR 95% CI: 1.82 (1.06-3.11), p- value 0.03 Significant relationship between the myocardial performance index and adverse outcome (area under the curve of 0.95) ROC: Significant relationship depicted between myocardial performance index and prediction of perinatal death (area under the curve of 0.95) MPI and and PET MPI PET • For adverse perinatal outcome, a cut-off Mod-MPI value of >0.55 conferred a sensitivity of 100% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 82.3100%), specificity of 82% (95% CI 51-96.5%) and a LR of 5.5. • For perinatal death, a cut-off Mod-MPI value of 0.67 conferred a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 52-100%), specificity of 84% (95% CI 62.5-94%) and an LR of 6.25. • The E/A ratios were significantly decreased in the pre-eclamptic group compared to controls (0.66 vs 0.79, p < 0.0001).No adverse outcomes were noted in the control group. MPIand and Pre-eclampsia Pre-eclampsia MPI • 1. Fetal cardiac function is significantly impaired in severe EO-PET • 2. Tracking MPI measurements may allow the clinician to monitor myocardial performance of fetuses in severe EO-PET across deteriorating placental vascular resistances. • 3.Specific cut-off Mod-MPI values for prediction of adverse perinatal outcome and perinatal death have been suggested. Conclusions Conclusions 1. Mod-MPI may be the only non-invasive technique in monitoring fetuses in gestational diabetes in order to detect a significantly abnormal metabolic milieu. 2. Monitoring tool for assessing deteriorating cardiovascular function in IUGR fetuses, and thereby guide the physician to optimal timing of delivery before overt acidosis, myocardial necrosis or perinatal death sets in. 3. Pre-eclampsia: evaluation of fetal cardiac function using the modMPI and E/A ratios together with the evaluation of umbilical artery Doppler flow could be included into an integrated monitoring model in the management of PET pregnancies Conclusions Conclusions • These studies of fetal cardiac dysfunction in high risk obstetric conditions makes the argument for fetal cardiac function to being part of an integrated approach to establish fetal wellbeing in high risk obstetrics