Natural Ventilation and Green Roof Strategies Atwater Commons, Middlebury College Mark Gleason, BSE, MSCE, P.E. 1 Richard Maimon, B.A., M. Arch., AIA2 Jason Smith, B.S., B. Arch., RA 3 José Almiñana, D. Arch, MLA, RLA, ASLA, LEEDAP4 John Nystedt, BSLA, RLA5 1 Project Manager, Facilities Planning, Middlebury College, Phone +1 802 443-5424. Fax 802443-2076. E-mail mgleason@middlebury.edu 2 Associate, KieranTimberlake Associates LLP, Phone +1 215 922-6600. Fax +1 215 922-4680. E-mail rmaimon@kierantimberlake.com 3 Project Manager, KieranTimberlake Associates LLP, Phone +1 215 922-6600. Fax +1 215 9224680. E-mail jsmith@kierantimberlake.com 4 Principal, Andropogon Associates, Ltd., Phone +1 215 487-0700. Fax +1 215 483-7520. Email alminanaj@andropogon.com 5 Project Manager, Adropogon Associates, Ltd. Phone +1 215 487-0700. Fax +1 215 483-7520. E-mail nystedtj@andropogon.com 1.0 INTRODUCTION Middlebury College is a small liberal arts institution located in Middlebury, Vermont. In 1995 the College committed to a ten-year expansion plan to ultimately increase academic year enrollment to 2,350 students. In so doing, the College embarked on an aggressive campaign of building projects, which included new academic, athletic, dining, and residential spaces. To maintain environmental integrity throughout its expansion and to guide new construction, College design decisions have focused on the relationship between the built and natural environments. The ultimate goal is to attain the highest-quality built environment while considering educational, community, economic, and environmental criteria. Middlebury College‟s commitment to responsible and sustainable development is demonstrated by recently completed and current building projects. Among the recently completed projects that demonstrate these institutional ideals are the following: Bicentennial Hall (2000), where use of a local forestry cooperative resulted in approximately 125,000 board feet of certified wood used for paneling, bookcases and millwork on every floor of the building. Seventy percent of the wood came from forests within thirty miles of the college. Old Science Center (2001), which was “deconstructed” to make room for a new library, and in so doing, the College was able to salvage for recycling and reuse over 97 percent of the building. Ross Commons (2002), where over 60 percent of the finish wood used on the project came from the college‟s own forest and where the college purchased design furnishings from area woodworkers using local certified lumber. Further testimony to the college‟s commitment is the design of Atwater Commons. Currently under construction, this project consists of two new residence halls and a new dining hall. The College‟s holistic approach has promoted, integrated, and applied its green design goals to all aspects of the project from initial site planning, community impact, and design strategies, to site demolition, the use of local and sustainable building materials, and construction protocols for reuse of on-site material and waste handling. Two of the most prominent features of this project, and the focus of this paper, are the design for natural ventilation in the residence halls, and the implementation of ecologically-based site development and landscape strategies, including a green roof on the dining hall, to enhance the built environment. 2. ATWATER COMMONS OVERVIEW 2.1 Site Development Figure 1 Atwater Site Model – Plan View Figure 2 Atwater Site Model – Northern View The design for Atwater Commons, prepared by KieranTimberlake Associates, Philadelphia, PA (KTA), supports and creatively fulfills Middlebury College‟s mission for residential life. The three new buildings supplement three existing buildings of Atwater Commons: Coffrin Hall, Le Chateau and Allen Hall. The existing architecturally diverse structures form an outdoor room with two north-south ridges flanking a grass green. Viewing the panorama from the southwest, the perception of this section of campus is of buildings set in the landscape - broad lawns, sparsely populated by a variety of trees and Adirondack chairs - with landscape continuity into 2 the distance. The new buildings, set around an intimate commons green, reinforce and participate in this setting by following an irregular, nuanced landscape-to-building approach. 2.2 Residence Halls The new residence halls face one another in a staggered manner defining the new Atwater Common. Each is placed parallel to and engaged with the two ridges forming Atwater‟s landscape. The halls bend slightly with the landscape contours, subtly breaking the long sides of the halls into smaller increments. The halls are approximately 90' apart at their closest interval, framing the view to and from the north. The residence halls vary in height relative to their relationship to Atwater Common, a sloping green lawn. Their roof ridge lines stay constant. The green falls away making Residence Hall A a four- to five-story building accommodating 84 beds and Residence Hall B a three- to four-story building accommodating 70 beds. The buildings contain various sized (3, 4, 5 bedroom) flexible suite arrangements and some single rooms. Both halls are vertically accessed through entrance lobbies serving stairways. Each stair serves six-toten suites with a maximum number of students using any entry totaling 40. The suites are oriented through the building (across its width) with exposures and views to the east and west. Single rooms are grouped vertically about one stair and entry. At the lowest levels, each hall contains shared programs including a library, seminar room and laundry. Figure 3 View of New Common Green with Residence Hall B at Center On the commons sides of the halls - which face one another - the windows are configured as a regular pattern of three wood windows for each suite common room. This arrangement maximizes light, view and ventilation. Local limestone in a warm gray tone, cut in linear pieces with tight joints, is utilized. The windows are deeply set, for shading purposes, and the masonry openings are „tied‟ with a granite lintel which provides additional shading. Granite lintels and columns, with recessed wood and glass walls, provide larger openings at the base for entries to lobbies, as well as the seminar room and library. The vertical pattern of windows above these entries is staggered, reflecting the pattern of the entry stairs rising above. 3 The eastern- and western-most sides, against the ridges, employ local granite in a rustic, uncoursed pattern. Windows are set in a less regular pattern, suggesting the individual bedrooms within. Lead-coated-copper roofs and trim finish the buildings with brick chimneys punctuating the roof and eave line. These chimneys refer visually to the College‟s earliest buildings, but serve here as ventilation stacks, assisting the natural ventilation of the buildings as discussed in Section 3 below. 2.3 Dining Hall Figure 4 Dining Hall from West Figure 5 Dining Hall Interior Atwater‟s new dining hall is positioned as a gateway on the path to the faculty residence to conveniently serve all students of the Commons. This places the dining and social center of the Commons in the geographical center of all buildings forming Atwater. It is oriented to capture views to the east and southeast toward the Town of Middlebury and the Green Mountains beyond. Engaging the dining hall into the western slope reduces the building‟s mass, and provides for a view of a landscaped roof, extending the landscape of Atwater into, around and over the building. Skylights, roof ventilation stacks, and a fireplace chimney provide a sculptural landmark to the structure from the Common and College‟s main campus path. Eastern (morning) and western (evening) light will illuminate the hall and serving areas. Service spaces are located below in a plinth that is engaged into the slope. The ground floor level of the dining hall will be faced in lead-coated-copper shingles and pierced by an exposed pathway stair that leads down and through the building to the Commons Faculty Associate residence. The main level of the dining hall will contain a student lounge, reception area, seminar room, and other kitchen services, and will be enclosed by a curtainwall of glass in wood frames with limited wood infill walls. The fireplace chimney is limestone and brick, sharing a common element with the residence halls. Trims and other surfaces of the soffits and roof are lead-coated copper. 4 3. RESIDENCE HALL NATURAL VENTILATION Middlebury College‟s residence halls are used not only during the academic year, but also in the summer to house students attending its internationally renowned Summer Language School program. The prospect of providing air conditioning to the new residence halls was reviewed by the College and the design team at the outset of the Atwater planning process. Issues of climate, geography, and program, in light of the College‟s environmental goals, suggested the consideration of alternative approaches to building thermal comfort. KieranTimberlake Associates consulted with the late Don Prowler, Philadelphia, PA, a noted environmental architect, to assist in developing the natural ventilation approach. A formal study measuring interior comfort levels was subsequently prepared by Arup, New York, NY. Design work was completed by Lundquist Killeen Potvin & Bender, Inc., St. Paul, MN, who served as building systems engineers for the project. The following key issues led to the design for natural ventilation: Climate: With the exception of 7 to 10 days of the year, generally during July and/or August, exterior temperature and humidity levels are well within the optimum thermal comfort range for human beings. Geography: The site is on a ridge line set between two major mountain ranges, with north-south valleys providing a channeling effect which helps to flush stagnant air and provide most days with air movement. The proposed siting and geometry of the two buildings is intended to assist in flushing the common outdoor space. Program: The residence halls are generally unoccupied during much of the peak summer cooling period between 9:00am to 5:00pm. Students are in classrooms, libraries and dining halls, many of which are air conditioned in the summer months. By the time students are returning to their rooms the building is beginning a potential flushing cycle, thereby negating the need for mechanically generated cooling. The natural ventilation design strategies developed for Atwater include both natural and mechanical tools that are integrated to promote summer-time cooling without the need for air conditioning. These strategies extend to all aspects of the design, and include the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The buildings are oriented north-south with their long facades facing east and west, taking advantage of spring, summer and fall prevailing winds. Exterior masonry walls, consistent with other campus buildings, add mass and a thermal sink for cooler air. Student suites are designed as floor-through “flats” with vertical entryways, allowing true cross-ventilation. Transoms above doorways allow air flow between bedrooms and common spaces. All spaces are equipped with ceiling fans to assist air flow and all windows have operable shades. A generous floor-to-floor dimension of 11‟-4” helps to stratify warmer air from cooler air, further aiding comfort. 5 6. Figure 6 The maximization of thermal comfort comes through mechanical assistance in the form of vertical ventilation stacks. Air can be removed from each suite by an individually controlled attic fan to exhaust suite air through the roof-top chimneys and draw in cooler night-time air through the windows. Section through Residence Hall Figure 7 Typical Suite Plan The natural ventilation components can be deployed at the occupants‟ discretion in a number of combinations depending on prevailing weather conditions. In the peak of summer the intent is to use mechanically assisted natural ventilation with ceiling fans and shades. Typical bedrooms and common rooms were analyzed for a peak external summer day condition, which is the most critical case for the proposed system. The models were simulated with various air change rates. The models indicate that ventilation rates of 2 air changes/hour during the day and 10 air changes/hour during the night for night flushing are optimal to meet the comfort range described by the ASHRAE Standard 55, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. The attributes of these natural ventilation strategies described above are principles of good architectural practice which many of the earlier campus buildings embraced. For Atwater Commons, these principles are reinterpreted for the 21st century. 6 4. LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES 4.1 Site Development The site and landscape design promotes the principals of maintaining a “balanced” site, natural drainage, and using native, low-maintenance species, highlighted by the design for the landscaped roof for the dining hall. A significant portion of an existing parking lot has been replaced with a large landscaped green, helping the project obtain a net decrease in impervious coverage. Reinforced lawn fire lanes also limit paved areas. The reduced runoff is directed along vegetated swales which naturally process the stormwater and encourage stormwater recharge. Although wet basins are not required by stormwater regulations (i.e., calculated post-development runoff is less than that calculated for pre-development conditions), they are included in the design to manage this stormwater, thereby further slowing and filtering the runoff. Figure 8 Site Plan for Atwater Commons Figure 9 Planting Plan for Atwater Commons Plant species native to the Middlebury area will be utilized throughout the site in order to minimize maintenance and encourage native fauna. Plants that are common in Vermont‟s red maple swamps have been utilized in the swales and basins, creating lush layers of sedges, grasses, ferns, and flowering forbs along with occasional shrubs and trees. The woodland edges will be planted with native trees and shrubs that naturally grow on the fringes of Vermont‟s upland hardwood forests, and the ground layer will be covered with locally-obtained leaf mulch. Higher up the slopes, the “red pine ridge” plant community that was in decline will be restored with pines and shrubs common in that plant community. Local pine needle mulch is utilized at the ground layer to aid in the establishment and restoration of the pine ridge plant community. 7 A major portion of the lawn area is planted in “no-mow” lawn which utilizes low-growing species that require minimal maintenance. It is anticipated that this “no-mow” lawn will be utilized in more areas of the campus in order to significantly decrease the need for mowing. For areas with higher foot traffic and increased passive recreation, lawn species that thrive in the local climate and existing soils without fertilization have been utilized. The buildings are set into the existing slopes to minimize the visual impact on the neighboring community. This building placement has created excavated rock that has been used in its blasted form for small retaining walls, or has been crushed and re-used throughout the project as construction aggregate for fill placed beneath and around the buildings. 4.2 Dining Hall Green Roof Numerous site strategies were investigated for the Atwater Dining Hall, with each evaluated for campus planning, student life, architectural and environmental opportunities. The wooded site east of the new residence halls emerged as the preferred location: its location is central to the five residential buildings, it provides wonderful views and natural light, and the sloping topography allows service and vehicular access to be separated from the pedestrian campus. The location also suggested the potential for a green roof, which will provide the following benefits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Storm water management. Green roofs retain 70 to 100% of rainwater in summer and 40 to 50% in winter. Excess water that flows to the storm system is cleansed by filtration through the plants and soil. Improved thermal insulation. European and Canadian research indicates that in summer, the temperature of a conventional gravel-ballasted roof is 70 to 80 degrees F higher than the temperature of a green roof. This excess heat is absorbed and re-radiated, substantially affecting air conditioning costs. In winter, due to the added insulative layer of soil and plantings, heat loss and the resulting heating costs are reduced. Based on these reductions in cooling, heating and HVAC equipment costs, typical payback time for European green roofs has been between two and five years. Extended durability of waterproofing. The insulative value of the green roof system also serves to protect the waterproofing layer from damaging ultraviolet radiation. This prolongs the lifespan of the waterproofing system. Many European green roofs installed in the mid-1970s retain their original waterproofing today. Improved acoustical insulation. Green roof systems can reduce airborne sound levels by 40 to 50 decibels. Absorbs heat. Eliminates the “heat island” and warming consequences of conventional roofing materials. Minimizes the development impact. The vegetation on the green room provides moderate replacement to lost habitat and is a dramatic aesthetic improvement compared to conventional roofing materials. 8 Figure 10 Green Roof Detail Options Figure 11 Roof Planting Plan Green roofs are characterized in two categories: “Intensive” systems support large specimens such as trees and shrubs through a deep soil layer (12” to 3‟); “extensive” systems support smaller specimens with thin layers of engineered soil mixes. Intensive systems are capable of supporting pavers and pedestrian traffic; extensive systems are generally not accessible. The main dining hall roof is an extensive system with 7” of engineered soil; the lower roof is a thinner extensive system with 3” of engineered soil. The planting design for the green roof incorporates exclusively native species, and draws its inspiration from flowering upland meadows and rock outcrop plant communities. Roof gardens are potentially difficult places for growing plants – very sunny, hot, and dry with shallow soils – so it was necessary to find plant species that would thrive under these conditions. Many green roofs follow German tradition, and emphasize sedum species (low growing succulent plants often used in rock-gardens), however, commercially grown sedum plants are invariably nonnative. The reference for this project was to natural areas where the growing conditions might be similar, such as dry upland meadows, open rock outcrops, and cliffs. From the preliminary list of possible plants, species that rely on deep roots systems for drought tolerance were eliminated. Species with bulbs, tubers or shallow roots are utilized because they are more adaptable to the relatively thin soils on the roof. The pattern for the herbaceous plants and groundcover shrubs is based on the visual patterns and drifts of species within a flowering meadow. Plant species naturally group into banded patterns that have varying colors and prominence from season to season. To encourage these banded patterns, the substrate undulates on the sloped roof in order to create bands of varying moisture regimes. The planted bands are expected to shift slowly over time as different species find their favored habitats; this is seen as part of the natural evolution of the plant community. 9 Roof planting maintenance will include occasional selective weeding of non-native invasive species, and supplemental watering during plant establishment period. 5. CONCLUSION The majority of systems and products selected for the residence and dining halls - inside and out, for construction and finish - reflect the College‟s commitment to selecting materials local to Vermont and the region, durable and of long-life, and generally „green‟ or sustainable to the environment. Sustainable design, construction and operation are evolving processes of planning, implementation, evaluation and revision throughout design and construction. Middlebury College recognizes the integral role environmental principles play in all of its activities and does not apply a veneer of green strategy at the end its projects. The Atwater Commons project is a testimony to the unique path the College, its consultants and its contractors are taking to raise their own standards of what constitutes sustainable design and operation at Middlebury College. 10