Hamlet: Prince of Denmark Key Themes: Corruption: Disease and Death imagery: “I am sick at heart” begins the corruption and disease imagery “vile and loathsome crust” “tis an unweeded garden which grows to seed things rank and gross in nature” “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” “Oh my offence is rank, it smells to heaven” Claudius likens Hamlet to s disease- describing him as “the hectic in my blood” Hamlet claims that Claudius is a “canker of our nature” The use of poison symbioses the corruption of the Danish Court- considered an especially heinous crime, the practise of evil foreigners Gravedigger scene- emphasis on death and decay. Hamlet expresses disgust at the physical corruption that follows death “Imperious Caesar, dead and turned to clay,/ might stop a hole, to keep the wind away” Characters draw explicit connections between the moral legitimacy of a ruler and the health of the nation. Denmark is frequently described as a physical body made ill by the moral corruption of Claudius and Gertrude, and many observers interpret the presence of the ghost as a supernatural omen indicating that “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” (I.iv.67). Caroline Spurgeon noted that “rank” occurs multiple times throughout the play. These image clusters enhance the sense of corruption throughout the play and serve to link certain parts together. Spurgeon identified that a “number of images of sickness, disease... the idea of an ulcer or tumour, as descriptive of the unwholesome condition of Denmark morally” Misogyny: Shattered by his mother’s decision to marry Claudius so soon after her husband’s death, Hamlet becomes cynical about women in general, showing a particular obsession with what he perceives to be a connection between female sexuality and moral corruption. This motif of misogyny, or hatred of women, occurs sporadically throughout the play, but it is an important inhibiting factor in Hamlet’s relationships with Ophelia and Gertrude. He urges Ophelia to go to a nunnery rather than experience the corruptions of sexuality and exclaims of Gertrude, “Frailty, thy name is woman” (I.ii.146). Claudius: Antithesis in Claudius’ first speech to the court: “defeated joy”, “with one auspicious and one dropping eye” “mirth in funeral and with dirge in marriage”. This implies falseness, someone who can express simultaneous joy and sorrow or show inappropriate emotions. There are two views of Claudius : suspicious and corrupted or a magnanimous leader. Wilson Knight believes Claudius to be “the typical kindly uncle, besides being a good king” claiming that it is a mistake to judge Claudius “as a hardened criminal”. The antithesis powerfully expresses conflict and confusion. It suggests a man attempting to balance conflicting emotions and values “the serpent that did sting thy fathers life now wears his crown” metaphor for the snake as Claudius is a biblical reference highlighting the corruption and devilish characteristics of Claudius. Claudius writes a letter to the English king instructing him to kill Hamlet. Claudius drops his facade and likens Hamlet to a fever “for the hectic in my blood he rages” The thought of revenge “warms the very sickness of my heart” (Laertes) compare this to Hamlet where the thought of revenge causes the sickness in his heart. Claudius uses flattery to obtain Laertes agreement- “gave you such a masterly report” “Laertes was your father dear to you? / Or are you like a painting of a sorrow, / A face without a heart?” Claudius uses emotional blackmail. This echoes Old Hamlet’s statement: “If thou didst ever thy dear father love... Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder”. Creates pity towards both Laertes and Hamlet who were blackmailed into doing the deeds “Hyperion to a satyr” – satyrs are lecherous, bestial mythological creatures. Osric and Polonius: Osric is seen as a symbol of the corrupt Danish Court, he seeks to please in order to gain power. He is a parallel to Polonius. Polonius is perhaps the most obviously corrupt character in Hamlet. His corruption has occurred long before the play begins; the progression is in the extent to which it is revealed to us. From this courteous, almost comically long-winded member of the court, emerges a personality that is first dominating (as he instructs Laertes: 'These few precepts in thy memory/ Look thou character.' [Act I, Sc. iii, 63]), clearly abusive towards Ophelia: “Affection? Pooh! /You speak like a green girl”, then meddling and subversive, as he sets spies on his own son, and finally irredeemably and ultimately fatally corrupt and subversive, as he schemes and plots around Hamlet. The comparison of Polonius to Jeptha, who promised to sacrifice the first living thing he met if he returned safely from war (which turned out to be his daughter), highlight’s Polonius’ corruption and low morals. Polonius’ repetitiveness and circular language create a character who likes the sond of his own voice. Hamlet sees through Osric’s façade dismissing him as “a waterfly” Rosencrantz and Guildenstern: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern epitomize the corruption of the Danish State. They willingly comply with Claudius’ request that they spy on Hamlet. Hamlet sees straight through them “you were sent for – and/ there is a kind of confession in your looks which your modesties/ have not craft enough to colour. I know the good king and queen have sent for you.” Their deceitful nature is highlighted when the also lie to Claudius. They are anxious to cover up the cross examination which led to the disclosure that they are being employed by Claudius. Hamlet is a highly complex character displaying a mixture of brilliance, melancholy, decision, indecision, mania and depression. In the beginning he is seen as an intelligent young man trapped in a corrupt court, we observe how he is perceptive and intelligent by his use of “I am too much i’the sun” and “nay it is I know not seems”. Hamlets perceptive and philosophical nature allows him to cut through the superficialities of outward appearance and the corruption of the Danish Court. This can be seen in Hamlet’s almost immediate discovery of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s falseness. He likens them to a sponge that “soaks up the kings countenance”. He sees through Polonius, “these tedious old fools”. Horatio: Horatio serves to highlight the corruption of characters especially Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. As he too is a friend from university. Of all Hamlet’s relationships, his one with Horatio has the most respect and it is to him that he reveals the most truth. Revealing his plot to catch out Claudius “the Mousetrap” Appearance vs. Reality: Appears in 4 forms: Deception, Madness, Theatre and Surveillance. Deception: “This above all, to thine own self be true”. Polonius after telling Laertes to never “be false to any man” sets a spy on him “Do not believe his vows for they are brokers,/ Not of that dye, which their investments show” “Be thou a spirit of health, or goblin damned...” 3.1.12 Rosencrantz and Guildenstern give a false account of Hamlet’s response adding to the deceitful nature of Elsinore. Similarly, Gertrude lies to Claudius claiming that Hamlet is “mad as the sea and wind” “God hath given you one face and you make yourselves another” The metaphor: “Denmark’s a prison” suggests that behind the facade is a horrible place full of deception making Hamlet feel isolated. Branaugh version: The highlight of this setting is the palace's hall of mirrors, which add to the grandeur of Elsinore, but also depict the deceptive appearance of Elsinore- the mirrors may beautify Elsinore, but hide dark secrets. Indeed, something is rotten in the state of Denmark. While this palace "appears open, rich and inviting as Derek Jacobi's vigorous, attractive Claudius and his bride . . . sweep down the great hall through lines of applauding courtiers" the camera's focus on Hamlet, clad in black, shows a figure who will "expose the black and grained spots which lie just beneath the surface of this lavish world" (Jackson 227). Madness: The Ghost “might deprive your sovereignty of reason, and draw you into madness?”. Horatio’s shows considerable foresight: the ghost ultimately does draw /hamlet into madness/ melancholy. “to put an antic disposition on” “I am but mad north-north-west. When the wind is southerly, / I know a hawk froma handsaw” “Of the feigned madness of Hamlet there appears no adequate cause, for he does nothing which he might not have done with the reputation of sanity. He plays the madman most, when he treats Ophelia with so much rudeness, which seems to be useless and wanton cruelty.” (Samuel Johnson) “Much discussion has turned on the question of Hamlet's madness, whether it be real or assumed. It is not possible to settle this question.... Shakespeare meant Hamlet to be in a state of intense cerebral excitement, seeming like madness. His sorrowing nature has suddenly been ploughed to its depths by a horror so great as to make him recoil every moment from a belief in its reality. The shock, if it has not destroyed his sanity, has certainly unsettled him.” George Henry Lewes The language form and structure is used by Shakespeare to signify madness. Hamlet uses rhyming couplets when he is sane; this is used countless times throughout the play. However when he is feigning insanity Hamlet’s speech often slips into blank verse, this lack of refinement symbolises the struggle and discord in Hamlet’s mind, which can be extended to include the struggle and corruption of the Court of Denmark . Ophelia also uses prose in madness; this signals the loss of reason. The willingness of Hamlet to adopt an “antic disposition” shows his alienation from Denmark and its values by adopting the garb of madness. It has symbolic significance denoting that Hamlet considers himself a pilgrim and a stranger in his own city. Ophelia: o Ophelia’s madness while not a deceptive appearance serves to divide “from herself and her fair judgement” o Ophelia’s mad ravings suggest the deeper preoccupations that have claimed her mind: the death of a loved one and the utter thwarting of her longing to have her love for Hamlet returned. CHARACTER FOIL Ophelia’s tragedy, like Hamlet’s, is the tragedy of obedience to a father. Only she actually goes mad and doesn’t stop at thinking about suicide (misogynistic element) Hamlet’s “antic disposition” serves as a mask for his bouts of melancholy and deep distress. It also provides him with a fool like persona to match that of Polonius and Osric. This allows him to engage in seeming frivolous banter in an attempt to penetrate the deceit that surrounds him without attracting attention to himself. Allows him to deliver insults without being realised by the other characters. This is not the mrk of a man with his mind in paralysis. o Claudius and Polonius perceive that there is something not right about Hamlet’s madness. “Madness in great ones must not unwatched go” o Theatre and Acting: The recurring notion of “seems”: “most seeming virtuous queen”, “I know not seems” etc. Introduces the idea of acting as a method of deception. “One may smile, and smile, and be a villain” “to put an antic disposition on” the notion of acting as a pretence may symbolise Hamlet’s preoccupation with false appearances “With one auspicious and one dropping eye, /With mirth in funeral and dirge in marriage”- establishes Claudius as hypocritical and contradictory. Claudius hides his guilty secret behind an outward show of integrity “With devotion’s visage,/ And pious action, we do sugar o’er/ The devil himself” “I am satisfied in nature” Laertes pretends to accept Hamlet’s apology, whilst preparing to kill him in a deceitful and dishonourable manner. a play-within-a-play -- turns the characters onstage into an audience watching actors, and confronts the actual audience with the fictional nature of what they are watching. Throughout the play, Hamlet switches between very different persona’s: he plays the fool, a madman, a commoner with whom the gravedigger can associate, as well as the prince. He often mimics other characters e.g Osric in Act 5.2. He uses puns to great effect, picking up a speaker’s words and giving them back with a different meaning. His very first words “A little more than kin, and less than kind” as well as his “nay I am too much I’the sun” play on Claudius’ use of “son”. The gravedigger is the only other character in the play who uses this style of ‘deliberate misunderstanding’. Hamlet is himself an adept actor, this can be seen with his enthusiastic talk with the plays, instructing them on how best to perform “The Mousetrap” Laertes is suspected by both his sister and his father of an inclination towards the primrose path of dalliance. Polonius advocates reticence, truth and straight dealing but is loquacious and devious Gertrude: The dramatic contrast sets the deep grief of Hecuba against the brief mourning and unusual speed with which Gertrude remarried. This is emphasised in the Zeffirelli version where Gertrude is displayed weeping over Old Hamlet’s grave before marrying Claudius. This highlights the disloyalty and deceitful nature of her character. Surveillance(Claudius and Polonius): Polonius’ plot to spy on his son Laertes introduces the sub theme of surveillance- he asks Reynaldo to lay a bait of falsehood” This is then mirrored in the next scene, serving to link Claudius and Polonius, Claudius asks Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to spy on Hamlet, to “draw him on to pleasures” in order to find out what’s wrong. These subplots signify the extent of Denmark’s corruption Claudius and Polonius are going to spy on Hamlet and Ophelia’s exchange “I will find /where truth is hid, though it were hid indeed /within the centre” The Nature of the Ghost: Marcellus – “this dreaded sight” - “this apparition” - “this thing” Horatio – “it harrows me with fear and wonder” causes him to “tremble and look pale” “this bodes some strange eruption to our state”- ill omen, then likens the apparition to the ominous signs that preceded the assassination of Caesar. Hamlet - “all is not well./ I doubt some foul play” - “a spirit of health or goblin damned” - “airs from heaven or blasts from hell” - “be thy intents wicked or charitable” Horatio- “what if it should tempt you toward the flood my lord/ Or to the dreadful summit of a cliff... deprive your sovereignty of reason and draw you into madness?” Marcellus- “something is rotten in the state of Denmark” The ghost suffers in purgatory- “confined to fast in fires,/ Till the foul crimes committed in my days of nature/ Are burned and purged away” Hamlet- “Alas poor ghost!” – he is sympathetic Ghost- “If thou didst ever thy dear father love... Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” the Ghost uses emotional blackmail Evidence of Hamlet’s changing mind – “It is an honest ghost” - “The spirit that I have seen/ May be a devil” Develops the play to prove Claudius’ guilt and ensure that the ghost is honest- this becomes a turning point in the play where the nature of the Ghost is no longer questioned. Hamlet- “I’ll take the ghosts word for a thousand pound” “A beautiful, pure, noble and most moral nature, without the strength of nerve which makes a hero, sinks beneath a burden which it can neither bear nor throw off” (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe). Therefore the Ghosts actions were cruel as they ultimately led to Hamlet depression. “the nature of the Ghost is intended to be an open question” – adds to the ambiguous nature of the play. (Nigel Alexander) Associated with the nature of the Ghost is the question of the morality of what he enjoins on Hamlet: revenge for murder. The Ghost represents an explanation and a course of action for Hamlet. Delay: The audience is conscious of Hamlet’s delay most clearly in his two soliloquies: “O what a rogue and peasant slave am I” and “how all occasions do inform against me”. Hamlet reproaches himself for his apparent cowardice and lack of action, calling himself “pigeon- livered” and likening himself to a whore who must “unpack [his] heart with words”, he then claims that he has “but one part wisdom/ And ever three parts coward”. He feels that if he were a proper avenger he would exhibit a huge amount of passion like that of Hecuba. At least part of the reason for his delay so far must be Hamlet’s fear that he is being deluded by the devil into imperilling the life of Claudius and the fate of his own soul. The ‘to be or not to be’ soliloquy throws everything back into debate he goes from certain to uncertain. It becomes a question of endurance, of contriving to accept the continuous punishing hostility of life Rather than being to cowardly to act it is apparent that Hamlet is courageous. This can be seen at the beginning and n the end. When first informed of the Ghost’s existence he claims that he will “speak to it though hell itself should gape”. This courage can also be seen in the end where Hamlet calmly confronts Laertes and Polonius. His existential questions “to be or not to be” turns into the accepting “Let be.” The cause of his delay or inaction is his philosophical nature, prone to questioning himself and others: his “resolution” is “sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought” Laertes and Fortinbras act as character foils- they are more active revengers. Fortinbras however appears devoted to fighting battles over nothing more than points of honour. Laertes also loses our sympathy by joining Claudius’ plot to poison Hamlet. Hamlet exclaims “But break my heart for I must hold my tongue” unlike Laertes who storms Claudius’ chambers at the first hint of a rumour. His restraint is what sets him apart, Laertes is too irrational and hot headed. Laertes and Fortinbras confirm Hamlets moral superiority and intelligence, his “god like reason” is an essential part of what makes him an attractive character. His consciousness is aligned with that of the audience. The use of Hamlet’s repetition like “Fie on’t a fie” and “too too” serve to lengthen his speeches adding to the sense of delay William Hazlitt claims “Hamlet is not a character marked by strength of will or even of passion, but by a refinement of thought and sentiment... his powers of action have been eaten up by thought”. This view is shared by Coleridge who claims “every incident sets him thinking” “Shakespeare wished to impress upon us the truth, that action is the chief end of existence” Hamlet knows perfectly well what he ought to do, but he is constitutionally averse to action, and his energy evaporates in self reproach. “Hence great, enormous, intellectual activity, and a consequent proportionate aversion to real action” – Coleridge Nietzsche dismisses the Coleridgean contemplator. It is not reflection but understanding which debars action: “the apprehension of truth and its terror” The Laurence Olivier film, 1948, "This is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind." This is not supported in the text. Hamlet does continually make decisions on the spur of the moment e.g his decision to follow the ghost, to kill Polonius and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. The contamination theory- Hamlet’s chief perplexity is one of translation: of finding a way to convert the Ghost’s injunction into action without being stained by the corruption of Denmark or becoming like the murderer whom he is to punish. This is echoed by several critics, Alexander claims “The question remains, how does one deal with such a man without becoming like him?” I think Hamlet rather than showing a conscious procrastination displays sense and practicality. He attempts to ensure that Claudius is guilty before he acts and uses the play to determine this. He clearly shows that he does not procrastinate with his hasty decisions like following the ghost and his murder of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Shakespeare then compares him to Laertes who upon hearing of his father’s death storms Claudius’ chambers and is all too easily swayed by the king to murder Hamlet instead. Laertes is rash and unthinking, and does not gain the audiences sympathy because he does not attempt to identify the guilt or innocence of his target. This begs the thought that Hamlet certainly would not be better off if he acted more quickly. Helen Gardner describes the division of the mind that exists for every thinking person in every age who tries to achieve justice without an outrage to conscience. Melancholy: melancholy, a pessimistic and cynical mindset, a tendency to ruthless self-criticism, depressed mood and persistent thoughts of suicide. Disillusionment or Melancholy is present throughout the play. It can be seen particularly in the “O that this too too solid flesh would melt” soliloquy. This soliloquy acts as the first glimpse into Hamlet’s troubled mind. He speaks the truth revealing the depth of his depression, even contemplating “self-slaughter”. His disillusionment with the world can be seen in the two lines “tis an unweeded garden/ that grows to seed things rank and gross in nature” and “how weary, stale, flat and unprofitable/ Seem to me all the uses of this world”. His shock and disgust he clearly attributes to his father who is “but two months dead” , his mother’s marriage with “wicked speed” and the shallowness of her grief. Hamlet’s melancholy is brought about by his philosophical and perceptive nature. This is clearly shown in his speeches to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in 2:2. Much like the soliloquy, Hamlets uses imagery to describe the range of his depression: “this majestical roof fretted with golden fire, why, it appears no other thing to me than a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours”. His existential notions question what it means to be human, incorporating questions like whether fate directs him, the purpose of religion and life after death. T.S Eliot, G Wilson Knight and L.C Knights create a negative image of Hamlet and drastically play down the causes of his melancholy. T.S Eliot describes the play as “an artistic failure” in which Hamlet has an excess of feelings which act to “poison life and obstruct action”. Wilson Knight presents us with a “sick soul” who “infects the state”. L.C Knights describes Hamlet as “a man who has given himself over to a false direction of consciousness”. These views distort the moral universe of the play by ignoring the simple causes of Hamlet’s melancholy: the murder of his father and subsequent “incestuous” marriage of his mother. He has a father dead, a crown snatched from him and a mother disgracefully married. On top of this is the added pressure created by the ghost, which lays on him “a burden which [he] can neither bear nor throw off” (Von Goethe) Bradley claims that Hamlet’s fatal flaw is that he suffers from an “excess of melancholy”. His delay is a symptom of his melancholy his disgust for life. This morbid condition is brought about by his mother’s lustful nature and the undue speed with which he remarried. This paralyses Hamlet making him in capable of decisive action L.C Knights stressed Hamlet’s immaturity and his lack of ‘a ready responsiveness to life’ Ophelia’s betrayal is highlighted when Hamlet stares at her: this can be interpreted as a ceremony of questioning, denunciation and separation. By this he cuts the closest tie that binds him to the court of Denmark, and takes Horatio as his only confidant. Hamlet may be “sorely distracted” but he always accepts responsibility for his actions. Hamlet is a man “more sinned against than sinning”. He is the wrong person to enter the world of corruption and to set it right. This aligns with the views of Von Goethe who claims that Hamlet struggles under “a burden which [he] can neither bear nor throw off” Revenge: For Hamlet revenge is a morality question “Revenge is not just justice, it means acting outside the legal institution in defiance of legitimate authority.” (Catherine Belsey) In Renaissance times, revenge was a crime but also an irreligious act, considered a sin. The revenger’s soul was damned. This thought preoccupies Hamlet’s mind throughout the play. Hamlet is an allegorical text, designed to prove the fruitlessness of revenge: Fortinbras fights pointless wars, Laertes hotheadedness makes him susceptible to manipulation, and Hamlet’s revenge ultimately brings about the death of 8 people where there should only have been one. The Revengers: o Hamlet has 4 revenge plots: Hamlet, Laertes, Fortinbras and Pyrrhus all seek revenge for their father’s deaths. o Laertes, Fortinbras and Pyrrhus all act as character foils to Hamlet. They are a textual device to show Hamlet’s moral integrity and the positive aspects of delay. The fact that Hamlet considers the fact that the Ghost might be lying to him shows a superior presence of mind. This is countered by Laertes hot-headed attack on Claudius, due to gossip and scandal. There is a parallel between the Ghost and Claudius in these scenes: The Ghost says “If thou didst ever thy dear father love/... Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” similarly Claudius blackmails Laertes “was thy father dear to you?/ or are you like the painting of a sorrow,/ A face without a heart?”. There is a parallel and contrast to how Hamlet reacts to the death of his father, unlike Hamlet, Laertes takes action. With language typical of the Elizabethan revenger- “To hell allegiance, vows to the blackest devil,/ Conscience and grace to the profoundest pit!/ I dare damnation.”, “To cut his throat i’th’ church” o Fortinbras like Laertes is an active revengeful son. However he too seems rash, ordering his soldiers to fight for “a little patch of ground/ That hath no profit but the name.” He is also described as “of unimproved mettle hot and full”. It is this which prompts Hamlet’s “but one part wisdom/ And ever three parts coward”. However the audience can see that it would not be better if Hamlet were more like Laertes or Fortinbras as they are too rash and do not think things through. o Pyrrhus son of Achilles wishes revenge for his father’s death at the hands of Priam. Like Hamlet he delays: “Pyrrhus stood, And like a neutral to his will and matter,/ Did nothing” The emphasis on the line “Did nothing.” Highlights the comparison between Hamlet and Pyrrhus. However, Pyrrhus does kill him in a highly brutal and savage way. o Subplots are all based on revenge. o Hamlet is not like Laertes, “I would cut his throat i’the church”. Nor is he like Fortinbras “of unimproved mettle hot and full”. Or like Claudius who claims “revenge should know no bounds”. Hamlet is moral, he has scruples, respect for religion, for God’s canons and man’s laws The powerful demand for revenge is countered in Hamlet's mind by three questions: Is revenge a good or an evil act? Is Claudius truly guilty and so to be punished? Is it Hamlet's responsibility to punish him? Throughout the play Shakespeare raises questions about whether justice is to be left to the state or taken into one's own hands, and about whether it is possible, in a cunning and deceitful world, to tell the good man from the criminal. However not to act is to leave the crime unpunished and allow the murderer to walk free. “Is’t not to be damned/ To let this canker of out nature come / in further evil?” “Conscience, which permits passive disobedience, forbids murder, and thus makes cowards of some revengers. Others are more resolute, like Laertes, and are deaf to its promptings” (Belsey) – Laertes claims “Conscience and grace to the profoundest pit / I dare damnation” Claudius assures Laertes that it is in the nature of revenge “to have no bounds” The Ghost becomes a symbol of the morality question: “whether it is nobler to suffer in Christian injustice or to take arms against secular injustice.” (Belsey) To undertake the ghosts demands is to suffer at the hands of god, as revenge is forbidden by the church, but not to undertake revenge is to allow a murder to go unpunished. The play explores the issue of the legitimacy of violence and the responsibility of the individual in pursuing justice, finding in the revenge convention an extraordinarily rich source of conflict to exhibit and illuminate the many faces of violence “Had Hamlet forgotten both the Ghost’s commands, it would have been well since Claudius is a good king, and the Ghost but a minor spirit” G. Wilson Knight Intertextual references and symbolism- The story of Cain and Abel is brought about during 1.2.105 and again twice in 3.3.38 and 5.1.65. The first murder shattered the human family; resulting in man’s falling away from god. The identification of Claudius with Cain- which he makes himself- gives us context for which Hamlets bitterness does not seem so “unreasonable” He ponders both the spiritual aftermath of death, embodied in the ghost, and the physical remainders of the dead, such as by Yorick’s skull and the decaying corpses in the cemetery. Throughout, the idea of death is closely tied to the themes of spirituality, truth, and uncertainty in that death may bring the answers to Hamlet’s deepest questions, ending once and for all the problem of trying to determine truth in an ambiguous world. And, since death is both the cause and the consequence of revenge, it is intimately tied to the theme of revenge and justice—Claudius’s murder of King Hamlet initiates Hamlet’s quest for revenge, and Claudius’s death is the end of that quest. Heightened, bombastic language, full of hyperbole like “Now could I drink hot blood” recalls traditional revenge tragedy. Existential Questioning: Linked to the theme of revenge is the great question of Hamlet's inner meditations: Is there a point to life at all? Much of Hamlet's anguish is caused by his effort to link even the most trivial event to the order of the universe. Is hamlet driven by fate? Hamlet claims “There’s a divinity that shapes our ends” – Does the will of god determines Hamlet’s life? Or is he responsible for his own decisions? I believe it is something that Hamlet cannot help- his fatal flaw- its beyond his control. Hamlet’s serenity in the face of death as a stoical fatalism or and acceptance of divine providence? “Let be” as opposed to “to be or not to be” Purgatory is shown to have no power to bring about what it wishes and nor has man. Inscrutable Fate has its way. Hamlet is a scholar, this can be seen through his classical allusions. E.g “Hyperion”, “Hercules”, “Fortune” etc. He is deeply concerned with what it is to be human and all the frailties that this entails. To Be or Not to be filmic interpretations: o Kenneth Branaugh version: The use of the two way mirror enhances the theme of deception and surveillance and highlights Claudius’ immorality, as he is watching Hamlet’s emotional outburst with no respect for his feelings. The mirror also provides an interesting camera angle. We watch Hamlet’s reflection as he speaks the soliloquy. This highlights the very nature of the soliloquy: that it is itself a reflection of Hamlet’s innermost thoughts and emotions. The bright white of the court room serves to emphasise Hamlet’s black costume: he is in mourning but also that he is a dark, conflicted character. o Zeffirelli version: It is set in the crypt which is an apt setting for Hamlet’s soliloquy as he contemplates death. The darkness of the scene, so unlike the Branaugh version, represents Hamlet’s conflicted thought process and the graves seem to spur on Hamlet’s contemplation of death and the misery of life.0 Conflicting opinions on Hamlet: Good Bad Ophelia- “noble mind”, ”th’ expectancy and Polonius- “Do not believe his vows, for they rose of the fair state” are brokers/ Not of that dye which their investments show” Fortinbras- “for he was likely had he been put Laertes-“for his choice depends on the sanctity on, to have proved most royal” and health of the whole state” – Hamlets love is just a whim Bradley- “Shakespeare seems to have decided T.S Eliot describes the play as “an artistic that his hero should exhibit in his latest hour all failure” in which Hamlet has an excess of the glorious power and all the nobility and feelings which act to “poison life and obstruct sweetness of his nature.” action”. Henry Mackenzie- believed Hamlet was a man Wilson Knight presents us with a “sick soul” of exquisite sensibility and virtue “placed in a who “infects the state”. “an element of evil in situation in which even the amiable qualities of the state of Denmark” his mind serve but to aggravate his distress and to perplex his conduct” Von Goethe- “A beautiful, pure , noble, and L.C Knights stressed Hamlet’s immaturity and most moral nature, without the strength of his lack of ‘a ready responsiveness to life’ nerve which makes the hero, sinks beneath a burden which it can neither bear nor throw off” Incorporate character relationships, dramatic techniques and critical interpretations into these. Textual Integrity: The play is relatable: “It is we who are Hamlet” Hazlitt “It absorbs all the problems of our time” Kott The unity of a text; its coherent use of form and language to produce an integrated whole in terms of meaning and value. Evaluating a text in terms of its textual integrity requires the students to consider the features and elements of a text and the extent to which it may possess an overall unity, integrated structure and unifying concept. Students’ close analysis helps them to evaluate how these features and elements function in different ways, leading to the consideration of the text’s overall coherence and complexity. In this way, they arrive at a sense of the text’s distinctiveness and enduring, or potentially enduring, value.