DETAILED WORK PLAN
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE
TRENT RIVER CROSSING AND ARTERIAL ROAD NETWORK
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, TRENT HILLS
FINAL DRAFT
October 22, 2012
IBI GROUP FINAL DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Approach................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 . 3 .1 P r o d u ce an u p d at ed Envi r o n m ent al S t u d y R ep o rt ( E SR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . 3 .2 Co m p l y w it h m u n ic ip a l cl a s s e a p ro ce s s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . 3 .3 M a x im i z e Exi st in g Inf o rm at io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . 3 .4 Us e U p d at e t e ch n i c a l inf o rm at ion w h e r e req u i r ed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . 3 .5 En s u r e E f f e ct iv e C o m m u n it y Eng ag em en t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1 . 3 .6 Av o id an y p ie c em e al in g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.4 Assumptions and Conditions............................................................................................................... 4 2. DETAILED WORK PLAN TASKS ........................................................................................... 5 3. EA COMPLETION SCHEDULE ............................................................................................. 20 4. EA COMPLETION BUDGET .................................................................................................. 21 Page i.
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
In 2007 the County of Northumberland retained an engineering consulting firm, Totten Sims
Hubicki (now AECOM), to carry out a Schedule “C” Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
(EA) study which at that time was called the Additional Trent River Crossing. Over a two-year
period the study progressed through the four phases of the Class EA process, culminating in a
report with recommendations to construct a new bridge along the Second/Alma corridor.
In December 2009, County Council deferred a decision on that EA, put it on hold, and directed staff
to further investigate the feasibility and cost of an additional bridge within the existing Bridge Street
corridor. In April 2010 County Council retained GENIVAR Consultants to carry out a Feasibility
Study which was completed and submitted to County Council in July 2012. The Feasibility Study
recommends widening the existing Campbellford Bridge to accommodate three travel lanes and a
recreation trail.
The purpose of the assignment document in this Detailed Work Plan is to describe how to resume
and complete the EA process to address Trent River crossing and related arterial road network
needs in Campbellford for the next 20 years and beyond. The County has retained IBI Group to
provide expert and objective advice on how to complete the EA process.
1.2 Objective
The objective in recommencing what is recommended be entitled “The Trent River Crossing and
Arterial Road Network Environmental Assessment” (EA) in the Municipality of Trent Hills is to
successfully complete the provincial EA process by the end of June 2013. This process is required
in order to construct any river crossing and arterial network improvements in the former town of
Campbellford.
The staging and scheduling of these improvements can be implemented based on funding
commitments, development opportunities and transportation needs in the town. However, the first
stage of construction must begin within ten years from the posting of the Notice of Study
Completion, although construction completion has no time limit.
This planning of transportation improvements in Campbellford is critical to ensuring that the town
remains a single, cohesive community well into the future, with the Trent River as its core rather
than a barrier. Both sides of the river must continue to be linked together as part of an effective
local transportation network in order to enhance resident mobility, safety and quality of life, and to
support economic vitality and resident services for Campbellford and area residents.
To implement this prime objective, a Municipal Class EA must be completed that complies with the
provincial Municipal Class EA process for Schedule ”C” and “B” projects, and with federal Canadian
EA Act requirements as amended in 2011.
1.3 Approach
IBI Group’s approach to this assignment was first presented in our proposal dated August 14, 2012,
and refined as follows based on preliminary backgrounder meetings with the County, Municipality
and Eastern Region of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE).
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
1 . 3 . 1 P R O D U C E A N U P D A T E D E N V I R O N M EN T A L S T U D Y R E P O R T ( E S R )
The updated ESR document needs to be a stand-alone report. It will include a summary of all work
tasks conducted as part of the 2009 Final Draft ESR and the 2012 Feasibility Study, with references
to these documents where required. This will be augmented with new updated and expanded
information prepared as part of the EA completion. This new ESR will cover all topics, and with
details on all changes since the 2009 report including summaries of previous findings that do not
change. The 2009 and 2012 reports will be separate documents.
1 . 3 . 2 C O M P L Y W I T H M U N I C I PA L C L A S S E A P R O C E S S
It has been confirmed with MOE that since the Municipal Class EA process is proponent-driven, the
County as the proponent can determine how best to complete the EA. The basic EA principles to
be followed in doing this are:

Objective by starting the EA recommencement with no pre-conceived solution
preferences;

Reasonable by considering only reasonable, meaning “feasible” alternatives;

Consultative with all affected parties and the general public;

Systematic in how impacts on all aspects of the environment are evaluated; and

Traceable in how this decision-making process is documented.
1 . 3 . 3 M A X I M I Z E EX I S T I N G I N F O R M A T I O N
A considerable amount of work has gone into plans for the Trent River crossing. Some of this
work, such as the 60% design review of a new bridge at the existing crossing, has even extended
into the detail design stage.
Much of this existing information can be incorporated into the EA completion in order to avoid cost
duplications, minimize EA completion timing and maximize the use of relevant information already
conducted for the project. MOE has also confirmed that since a Final Draft ESR was presented to
the public in late 2009, and again in May and September of 2011 focusing on the existing
Campbellford Bridge alternatives, further consultation and PICs should deal only with new
information, and not repeat information and decisions previously made unless they relate to the
ESR update.
We recommend that the decision on what information to incorporate into the new process be
confirmed with the Ministry of the Environment as part of the recommencement initiation. However,
some information will require updating.
1 . 3 . 4 U S E U P D A T E T E C H N I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N W H ER E R EQ U I R E D
Three types of previous technical information will need to be updated, namely:

Traffic data on volumes, travel patterns and Level-of-Service to update the Problem /
Opportunity Statement, including an expanded community-wide traffic analysis;

Relevant provincial/federal policies on which the EA process is based; and

The evaluation process conducted for the 2009 EA and 2012 Feasibility Study.
Page 2
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
1.3.5 ENSURE EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To recommence this EA process, a proactive and continuous engagement process with involved
agencies, stakeholders and members of the public will be required. Based on the project history, a
high degree of project interest and community engagement is expected early and continuously
through the EA process. This interest must be encouraged as “positive engagement”, rather than
dwelling on past experiences, issues and concerns. To do this, community engagement will involve
the following principles:

Follow the Municipal Class EA planning principles involving objectivity and
traceability in the planning process;

Contact the community early in the recommencement to explain the project, the
completion process and how the community can provide input. This can be done
with media notices, press releases and circulation of a project update newsletter;

Meet all mandatory consultation requirements required for Phases 1 to 4 of the
Schedule C Municipal Class EA Process. During the 2007/09 study, all these
requirements were met by the three Public Information Centres (PICs) and
associated consultation activities conducted at that time;

Provide convenient ways for the public to provide meaningful input to the study
through various opportunities including a project web site;

Maintain a consistently open, objective and traceable dialogue with interested
agencies, stakeholders and members of the public. Proactively respond to their
ideas and issues, and minimize any misunderstandings that can negatively impact
the EA process;

Rely on organized stakeholder groups, organizations and agencies to provide
coordinated, efficient and cost-effective input and feedback to the project; and

Work interactively with the Steering Committee and Project Team so they
understand all alternatives, the selection of the preferred EA solution and have the
opportunity to shape it.
1.3.6 AVOID ANY PIECEMEALING
The provincial EA process defines piecemealing as the breaking up of a larger project into smaller
component parts so each can be dealt with separately. In the case of the Trent River Crossing and
Arterial Road Network EA, separation of any arterial road network changes relating to the river
crossing would constitute piecemealing and would not comply with the EA Act.
The EA completion avoids this situation by including the “Arterial Roadway Network” as part of the
new EA process. This means that in addition to the actual Trent River crossing works, the EA will
include any associated improvements needed at key arterial intersections. The community-wide
traffic analysis will assist in identify network improvements that are required as a result the crossing
improvement, and others that are required in response to other traffic changes in the community.
These other traffic changes may require only a Schedule “B” or even pre-approved Schedule “A+”
EA approach, so they may not need to be included in the Schedule “C” process.
Page 3
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
1.4 Assumptions and Conditions
1. The scheduling objective of this assignment is to present the Final Draft ESR document to
County and Municipality Council in June, 2013. The subsequent timing of EA completion
after that will be determined by Council decisions on the study recommendations and
public response following the Notice of Study Completion;
2. Full involvement of the OPP, with the authority to stop traffic, will be required in order to
conduct an intercept-type of Origin-Destination traffic survey;
3. Scheduled technical meetings with the Project Team and progress meetings with the
Steering Committee will be held on the same day;
4. Decisions of the Steering Committee will be made based on the Committee’s Terms of
Reference, (June 2012);
5. IBI Group will use and make reference to all previous consultant reports, designs, notes
and other technical information relating to this assignment;
6. The EA completion will be directed by the Steering Committee, with the Ontario Ministry of
the Environment and other external agencies providing support services as required; and
7. The focus of all public information and ESR preparation will be on new, expanded or
updated information. The EA completion will not be a venue to question or reassess the
2009 EA process or subsequent approval of the 2012 Feasibility Study.
1.5 Role of Steering Committee
To direct all aspects of the EA study through to completion, and to make joint recommendations to
the Councils of the Municipality of Trent Hills and Northumberland County.
The Steering Committee has no formal decision-making authority. It will provide advice and make
recommendations to the two municipal Councils that do have decision-making authority.
1.6 Role of the Project Team
The Project Team, comprised of County and Municipality staff representatives and IBI Group staff,
will provide a technical review of all EA study research, findings, conclusions and
recommendations, including identification of issues to be resolved either before or at Steering
Committee meetings.
Page 4
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
2.
DETAILED WORK PLAN TASKS
TASK 1 – RECOMMENCED CONSULTATION
Rationale: To reintroduce the study to external agencies, stakeholders, members of the public and the media
explaining the new completion process, why the study was put on hold, new information and how to get
involved.
Existing Documentation: Previous Steering Committee minutes and subsequent County staff reports.
Sub-Tasks:

Prepare draft newsletter and media release for Project Team approval;

Prepare draft Notice of Study Re-Commencement for Project Team approval; and

Prepare draft re-commencement letters to previously contacted external agencies and stakeholders,
including the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) confirming what new role they may
play in the study.
Completion Schedule: Submit draft newsletter and media release to Municipality of Trent Hills council for
information at November 20, 2012 meeting, and to County Council on November 21, 2012 for decision.
Assuming County Council approves and authorizes commencement of this assignment on November 21st,
preliminary consultation material should be published and circulated by November 31, 2012
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, M. Radue
Deliverables: Finalized preliminary consultation newsletter, notification letters and media notice.
Budget: $4,000
EA PHASE 1: PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY
TASK 2 – CONSULTATION: COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Rationale: Completing the Trent River crossing and Arterial Road Network EA is expected to generate
considerable local interest. Therefore, an open and continuous consultation process is required. Similar to the
2008/09 EA process, members of the public and interest groups will have the opportunity to ask questions and
offer comment throughout the process. This consultation community outreach task is needed so that the
consulting team can assist the County and Municipality in responding to this expected community interest.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Prepare draft responses to questions and comments from the public and groups;

Prepare project update material for a study web page of the County’s web site; and

Liaise with local media as required.
Completion Schedule: Continuous through the EA process.
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley and consulting team members as required.
Deliverables: Draft response materials
Budget: $10,000 (based on 50 hours)
Page 5
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 3 – UPDATE PROBLEM / OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT
Rationale: Ensure the Problem Statement is up-to-date as it relates to the existing Campbellford Bridge traffic
volumes, traffic Level-of-Service during the peak vs. off peak periods and seasons and the structural condition
of the bridge.
Expand information on the opportunities provided by improved long-term Trent River crossing capability in the
Campbellford area, and related improvements to the arterial road network for example involving emergency
response, accessibility, community cohesiveness and downtown urban design.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR:1
Section1.3 Problem and Opportunity Statement
Section 3.0 Future Conditions
Section 4.0 Need and Justification
Sub-Tasks:

Task 3A: Updated Traffic Data Collection

Task 3B: Updated Existing Arterial Road Network Traffic Conditions

Task 3C: Travel Origin-Destination Survey

Task 3D: Updated Traffic Forecasts
Completion Schedule: See Tasks 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D
Key Staff Assignment: S. Johnston, A. Ortlieb
Deliverables: Updated ESR Sections on:

Problem / Opportunity Statement

Existing arterial road network transportation conditions

Future traffic conditions
Budget: $48,100 (Task 3A-3D)
TASK 3A – UPDATED TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
Rationale: Enhance acceptability of existing traffic condition information by using current traffic turning
movement data at strategic arterial road network intersections.
Existing Documentation: New traffic data will replace data reported in 2009 ESR document.
Sub-Tasks:

Confirm 15 strategic intersection locations for turning movement counts;

Retain sub-consultant to conduct counts and document results; and

Discuss emergency response conditions with Police, Fire and Ambulance officials.
Completion Schedule: December 7, 2012
Key Staff Assignment: S. Johnston, traffic data collection sub-consultant
Deliverables: Current off-season (off-peak) turning movement counts and factored summer season counts at
1
Additional Trent River Crossing Schedule “C” Class Environmental Assessment, Environmental Study Report, AECOM Canada Ltd.,
August 2009.
Page 6
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 3A – UPDATED TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION
strategic arterial road network intersections.
Budget: $3,000 plus $5,250 traffic data collection (15 locations)
TASK 3B – UPDATED EXISTING ARTERIAL ROAD NETWORK TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Rationale: To review and evaluate existing and future traffic conditions in the Campbellford arterial roadway
network associated with short-listed Trent River crossing alternatives, and to account for growth and changes
to traffic conditions since 2009.
Existing Documentation: Traffic analysis from 2009 ESR
Sub-Tasks:

Review 2009 ESR traffic analysis in detail;

Identify, with Task 3A, additional intersections for analysis;

Develop Synchro / HCS analysis of intersections and prepare Level-of-Service output;

Assess seasonal variation in traffic flow;

Review emergency response conditions and compare to provincial targets; and

Document any deficiencies.
Completion Schedule: December 17, 2012
Key Staff Assignment: S. Johnston, C. Hwang
Deliverables: Technical memo for existing conditions analysis, to be incorporated into final ESR report.
Budget:.$7,000
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #1
Rationale: Review traffic analysis (Tasks 3A, 3B), O-D Survey plan and screening of alternative solutions.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Agenda and Minutes;

Memo summarizing overall study issues, previous decisions, new information and EA need;

Memo describing proposed screening process for alternative solutions including screening criteria; and

Other meeting information
Completion Schedule: week of January 14, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, S. Johnston
Deliverables: Agenda and minutes; and
Approved O-D survey plan
Budget: $3,950
Page 7
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 3C – TRAVEL ORIGIN-DESTINATION (OD) SURVEY
Rationale: Provide solid data from which to analyze potential diversions of traffic to alternative Trent River
crossing locations. OD survey will enhance the rationale for the preferred alternative.
Existing Documentation: 2009 ESR did not include OD survey. Diversion analysis was based on 1996 report.
Sub-Tasks:

Study Initiation and Research – Meet with all stakeholders including representatives of the Municipality,
Northumberland County, Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) downtown BIA and Chamber of Commerce to
review the survey. Develop detailed Survey Plan including draft survey form and survey dates (with backup
dates for bad weather). Solicit input on survey design from stakeholders. Confirm what approvals are
necessary to conduct survey.

Survey Preparation – Organize survey staffing consisting of supervisor and surveyors. Initiate approvals
with OPP, County and Municipality. Conduct a field investigation to finalize survey procedures. Train field
personnel of survey procedures and safety precautions. Notify the public through use of “Upcoming Traffic
Survey” signs and media coverage.

Conduct Survey – includes the following (preliminary, subject to change):
o
Confirmation of OPP management of traffic intercept role using Paid Duty officer(s).
o
Survey will be run from 7 AM to 7 PM on one weekday followed by one weekend-day, with a target to
survey 10% of vehicles per day.
o
An OPP officer will be stationed on Bridge Street westbound, near the intersection with Queen Street /
Grand Road. Officer will intercept westbound vehicles and direct drivers to turn right (north) onto Queen
Street. Second OPP officer and survey team will be located on Queen Street north of Bridge Street to
receive vehicles. Interviews will be conducted on road shoulder.
o
Drivers will be informed of the survey and told that participation is voluntary. Drivers will be informed of
privacy policy. Drivers can leave if desired and will be given directions to return to Bridge Street.
o
Conduct interviews verbally with interviewer recording answers on survey form.

Data Coding and Processing – Staff will perform manual entry of survey data. Trip start and end points will
be geo-coded (assigned coordinates). Survey database will be cleaned and error-checked. Survey data will
be expanded based on traffic counts.

Analysis – Trips will be assigned to suitable zone system. Origin-destination (OD) matrix will be developed.
Maps indicating travel patterns and volumes will be prepared. Assessment of traffic diversions for bridge
alternatives will be coordinated with traffic analysis tasks. Summer traffic volume will be accounted for in
the analysis.

Develop Origin-Destination Survey Report – Draft report will document all aspects of the survey including
adherence to survey plan, error checking, expansion process, and analysis of results. Following review,
final report will incorporate comments as necessary.

Options to intercept survey would be 1) license plate trace survey or 2) mail-back OD survey.
Completion Schedule: Approvals to proceed by January 14, 2013. Complete survey by January 31, 2013.
Survey Report submittal February 22, 2013. The option of conducting the survey during the summer would
delay the study completion by at least six months.
Key Staff Assignment: B. Mori, A. Mori, S. Johnston, D. McElroy, J. Wang.
Deliverables: Origin-Destination Survey Report
Budget:.$29,350 plus $5,000 OPP Paid Duty and $5,125 OD Survey Expenses/Contingency (Total $39,475)
Page 8
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 3D – UPDATE TRAFFIC FORECASTS
Rationale: Given new origin-destination data and any updated land use changes (proposed, planned,
approved) since 2009, revised traffic forecasts will be developed for each of the short-listed river crossing
alternatives. Updated traffic forecasts will be very defendable due to the OD survey.
Existing Documentation: 2009 ESR provides forecasts for comparison
Sub-Tasks:

Import origin-destination matrix from Task 3C;

Develop peak period and peak hour factors for time-of-day analysis;

Evaluate traffic diversions under each roadway alternative for the base-year (2012);

Develop population and employment forecasts and growth rates to expand local trips;

Research overall economic growth to expand recreation and vacation trips; and

Extrapolate future traffic forecasts for each road network alternative.
Completion Schedule: February 22, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: S. Johnston, J. Wang, C. Hwang
Deliverables: Technical memo detailing updated traffic forecasts, to be incorporated into final report.
Budget: $8,750
EA PHASE 2: ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
TASK 4 – UPDATE / EXPAND INVENTORIES
Rationale: Ensure that the inventory of existing socio-economic, cultural, natural and archaeological conditions
is up to date and covers all alternative solutions.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR:
 Section 2.1 Socio-Economic Environment with any updates on growth and
development in the town;
 Section 2.3 Natural Environment to include the existing Campbellford Bridge
crossing area; and
 Section 2.4 Archaeology to include the existing crossing area.
Sub-Tasks:

Task 4A - Update and expand 2009 ESR Appendix C Natural Environment Site Review Report, Warme
Engineering and Biological Services by adding new aquatic inventory in the Campbellford Bridge area;

Task 4B – Add Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Campbellford Bridge footprint expansion;

Task 4C – Add Environmental Noise Assessment of Campbellford Bridge crossing;

Task 4D - Add air quality impact assessment; and

Update Draft ESR text and Appendices as required.
Completion Schedule: All additional inventories completed by January 31, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley
Page 9
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
EA PHASE 2: ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
TASK 4 – UPDATE / EXPAND INVENTORIES
LGL Limited, natural environment
Archaeoworks Inc., Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
IBI Group, noise
John Chandler, air quality.
Deliverables: Updated 2009 Draft ESR Sections 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 and additional Appendix reports
Budget: $37,760 including LGL Limited $12,360, Archaeoworks Inc. $3,500 and J. Chandler $7,000
TASK 4A – UPDATE / EXPAND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT INVENTORY
Rationale: Replacement or modifications to the existing Campbellford Bridge, and construction of a new bridge
at this location would likely necessitate in-water work which may constitute a harmful alteration of fish habitat.
Since no detailed fisheries investigation was conducted in the vicinity of the existing bridge as part of the 2009
ESR, a fisheries investigation is required to supplement previous investigations, including documentation of
existing conditions, impact assessment and mitigation and identification of potential compensation strategies. It
is expected that the alternative of replacing the existing Campbellford Street Bridge will be based on the
analysis and design prepared by GENIVAR as documented in their July 2012 report.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR:
 Appendix C Natural Environment Site Review Report
 Section 2.3 Natural Environment
Trent River Crossing in Campbellford Feasibility Report, July 2012
Sub-Tasks:

Background information related to fisheries will be collected from the original ESR, the Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR), the Trent-Severn Waterway, the Lower Trent Conservation Authority, the County of
Northumberland and the Municipality of Trent Hills. A field investigation will be undertaken at the subject
site following the Stream Assessment Protocol for Ontario (MNR 2005). Given the nature of this study area
and the availability of existing information on the fish community in the Trent River, no fish sampling is
proposed, although a detailed habitat assessment will be performed to document habitat conditions.

The sensitivity/significance of the fish habitat at the existing Campbellford Bridge location will be
determined in relation to provincial, regional and local municipal policies.

Impact analysis will be performed to identify the likelihood and significance of potential adverse effects on
fish and fish habitat and to identify impact management measures including avoidance, mitigation,
enhancement and compensation.

Recommendations will be made for environmental monitoring during and post-construction. The results of
the fisheries investigation will be documented in a stand-alone Fisheries Assessment Report.

Meetings will be held with regulatory agencies during the study to identify and secure environmental
approvals-in-principle required as a result of this project. A total of two meetings with regulatory agencies
are included in the work plan.
Completion Schedule: Field investigations will be completed by December 1, 2012 assuming authorization to
commence work is received in a timely manner.
Key Staff Assignment: Grant Kauffman, M.E.S., LGL Ltd.
Joseph Cavallo, B. Sc., LGL Ltd.
Technicians, LGL Ltd.
Page 10
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 4A – UPDATE / EXPAND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT INVENTORY
GIS Analyst, LGL Ltd.
D. Drackley, IBI Group
Deliverables:

A stand-alone Fisheries Assessment Report of the existing Campbellford Bridge crossing to document
the results of the fisheries investigation.
Budget: $12,360 excluding HST assuming:

The fisheries investigation will be carried out during a single site visit; and

LGL will attend two meetings with regulatory agencies, and any additional meetings are not included in
the budget and will be charged as incurred.
TASK 4B – EXPAND STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Rationale: Ensure than any surface or sub-surface ground disruption beyond the existing Campbellford Bridge
shore footprints is included in the archaeology inventory.
Existing Documentation: 2009 Final Draft Report Section 2.4 Archaeology
ESR Appendix D: Archaeological Assessment
ESR Appendix B: Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (no added work required)
Sub-Tasks:

Stage 1 background research;

Archaeological site potential evaluation; and

Report preparation to augment April 2008 report.
Completion Schedule: Completion by December 31, 2012
Key Staff Assignment: Archaeoworks Inc.
Deliverables: Stage 1 report of existing Campbellford Bridge crossing
Budget: $3,500
TASK 4C – EXPAND ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
Rationale: The Environmental Noise Assessment report prepared by RWDI dated June 3, 2009 covers only
the Second Street/Alma Street river crossing alternative preferred at that time. As a result, any comparative
noise impact assessment for the existing Campbellford Bridge crossing alternative is not available and needs to
be conducted in order to quantitatively compare the noise impacts of the Second/Alma alternative with that of
the existing crossing location.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR:
 Appendix F Environmental Noise Assessment
Sub-Tasks:

Follow established Ontario MOE protocol to forecast roadway noise and determine warrants for related
noise attenuation;

Confirm “noise sensitive areas” associated with the existing Campbellford Bridge crossing area;

Use existing and forecasted crossing traffic data at the Campbellford Bridge as input to the most recent
Page 11
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 4C – EXPAND ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
version of the STAMSON noise forecasting model including the following factors: 1) traffic volume, 2)
percentage of medium and heavy trucks, 3) terrain including vertical slope of bridge crossing, 4) traffic
speed, and 5) any existing sound barrier; and

Compare warranted noise mitigation of existing river crossing with previously preferred Second/Alma
alternative.
Completion Schedule: Noise forecasting can be conducted once future traffic forecasts across the Trent River
as part of the arterial road network analysis have been conducted. Tentative completion by January 31, 2013.
Key Staff Assignment: S. Lang, IBI Group Technicians, D. Drackley, S. Johnston
Deliverables: Environmental Noise Assessment of the existing Campbellford Bridge crossing to compare with
the previous Second Street/Alma Street noise assessment from the 2009 Final Draft ESR.
Budget: $7,900
TASK 4D – ADD AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rationale: No air quality impacts were investigated as part of the AECOM 2008/2009 EA process. However
this impact was identified as a concern by some members of the public and stakeholders during the
consultation process in 2010. Furthermore, air quality has become a major impact consideration for most urban
transportation projects today. Also, during construction there can be the possibility of short-term air quality
impacts, especially in the relatively small context of downtown Campbellford.
Traffic congestion generates air quality problems. If improved road capacity can reduce road congestion, it can
heave beneficial air quality effects. This should be added to the impact assessment in Campbellford.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Confirm existing and future (20 year) traffic Level-of-Service deficiencies in the Campbellford arterial road
network as the Do-Nothing alternative;

Qualitatively describe air quality impacts of the Do-Nothing alternative based on forecasted traffic growth
and river crossing bridge design;

Describe air quality mitigation opportunities associated with the Do-Nothing and alternative river crossing
alternatives; and

Incorporate this new comparative impact evaluation into that prepared as part of the AECOM 2009 ESR.
Completion Schedule: January 31, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: John Chandler, A.J. Chandler and Associates
Deliverables: Air quality impact report
Budget: $7,000
Page 12
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 5 – UPDATE ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND EVALUATION
Rationale: Maintain all alternative solutions from Section 6.1 of the 2009 Draft ESR and add “Improve /
Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge” as a feasible alternative solution based on results of the GENIVAR
Feasibility Study”.2
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR:3 Section 6.1 Development and Initial Screening of
Alternative Solutions; and
Trent River Crossing in Campbellford Feasibility Study (GENIVAR).
Sub-Tasks:

Document rationale for adding “Improve / Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge”.

Prepare visualization renderings of the short-listed finalist solutions;
Update screening methodology and criteria for screening alternative solution and selecting short-listed final
alternatives; and

Update recommendations for arterial road network improvements associated with Campbellford Bridge
alternative solution.
Completion Schedule: February 22, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, T. Brumfit, A. Ortlieb, graphics staff
Deliverables: Revised 2009 Draft ESR:

Section 6.1.1 Traffic Operations Improvements Along Bridge Street;

Section 6.1.2 Improve The Existing Bridge on Bridge Street;

Section 6.3.1 Planning Alternatives;

Section 6.3.2 Initial Evaluation;

Section 6.3.3 River Crossing Alternatives;

Section 6.3.4 “Improve / Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge” Feasibility Assessment; and

Section 6.3.5 Evaluation.
Budget: $28,800 (including $10,000 for renderings)
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #2
Rationale: To review results of the expanded inventories, updated alternative solution evaluation, preferred
solution and information to be presented at Public Information Centre (PIC) #1.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Agenda and Minutes;

Technical inventory reports; and

Draft PIC #1 exhibits and public information material.
Completion Schedule: week of March 11, 2013
2
Trent River Crossing in Campbellford Feasibility Report, GENIVAR, July 2012
Additional Trent River Crossing Schedule “C” Class Environmental Assessment, Environmental Study Report, AECOM Canada Ltd.,
August 2009.
3
Page 13
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #2
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb, M. Radue
Deliverables: Agenda and minutes; and
Draft technical inventory reports; and
Final PIC #1 exhibits and public information submitted to Councils for information prior to PIC.
Budget: $5,600
TASK 6 – CONSULTATION: PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #1
Rationale: Inform review agencies, stakeholders and the public on the results of the updated evaluation of
alternative solutions with the “Improve / Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge” alternative included. .
Existing Documentation: 2009 Draft ESR section 6.3 on the evaluation of alternative solutions including the
preferred alternative.
Previous comments and responses on the preferred alternative as reported in the
2009 ESR Appendix A and Section 5.
Sub-Tasks:

Finalize Public Information Centre date, time and location;

Prepare Draft PIC exhibits, information handout, comment sheet, web page material and Notice of PIC for
Project Team approval and conduct PIC; and;

Prepare PIC Summary Report including review of comments.
Completion Schedule: March 29, 2012
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb, T. Brumfit, S. Johnston
Deliverables: PIC materials, summary report and revised 2009 Draft ESR Section 5.0 and Appendix A.
Budget: $11,420
TASK 7 – CONFIRM PREFERRED SOLUTIONS
Rationale: Select the best solutions to the long term Trent River crossing and associated arterial road network
needs in Campbellford based on an expanded evaluation of alternative solutions that includes “Improve /
Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge”.
Existing Documentation: 2009 Draft ESR Section 6.3
Sub-Tasks:

Incorporate “Improve/Replace Existing Campbellford Bridge” into 2009 Draft ESR evaluation methodology.

Update of previous ESR Section 6.3.6. Preferred Alternative.
Completion Schedule: March 29, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley
Deliverables: Revised ESR Section 6.3.
Budget: $6,100
Page 14
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #3
Rationale: To review public feedback from PIC #1 and confirm the preferred river crossing and arterial road
network solutions.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Agenda and Minutes;

PIC #1 Summary Report; and

Technical memo on preferred solutions
Completion Schedule: April 17, 2013 DECISION
POINT #1
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb, M. Radue
Deliverables: Agenda and minutes; and
Draft technical inventory reports; and
Edits for PIC #1 exhibits and public information material.
Budget: $5,600
EA PHASE 3: ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR PREFERRED
SOLUTION
TASK 8 – EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR FINAL PREFERRED SOLUTION
Rationale: In the 2009 Draft ESR, the preferred planning solution was a new bridge crossing of the Trent River
about 400m south of the existing Campbellford Bridge linking Second Street and Alma Street. The resulting
identification, evaluation and selection of the design concept were all based on this second bridge solution.
The alternative solution of improving and replacing the existing Campbellford Bridge had been screened out
from further consideration and so was not evaluated in the 2009 report. The rationale for Task 8 is to reintroduce the existing Campbellford Bridge as a feasible alternative solution, and compare the design features
of this crossing with those of the Second Street/Alma Street new bridge selected in 2009.
At its meeting on June 25, 2012, the project Steering Committee endorsed these final two alternative solutions.
The rationale for Task 8 is then to compare these two alternatives using an evaluation methodology and criteria
that combines the 2009 AECOM evaluation with the 2012 GENIVAR evaluation.
Existing Documentation: 2009 Draft ESR Section 6.4
Trent River Crossing in Campbellford Feasibility Report, GENIVAR, 2012
Sub-Tasks:

Incorporate the previous 2009 AECOM evaluation with the 2012 GENIVAR evaluation of alternative
designs for the Second Street/Alma Street alternative and existing Campbellford Bridge alternative
respectively;

Expand the evaluation criteria and process as required to ensure that all considerations identified through
the Draft ESR consultation process are reflected in this updated evaluation, including:

Provision of river crossing redundancy;

Road network classification and responsibility (County or Municipality);
Page 15
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
EA PHASE 3: ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR PREFERRED
SOLUTION
TASK 8 – EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR FINAL PREFERRED SOLUTION


Impacts on provision of social housing;

Direct and indirect property impact compensation needs.
Identify the comparative pros and cons of each of the finalist alternative designs.
Completion Schedule: April 30, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: A. Ortlieb, T. Brumfit, D. Drackley,
Deliverables: Revised ESR Section 6.4
Budget: $15,400
TASK 9 – DETAILED INVENTORY FOR FINAL PREFERRED SOLUTIONS
Rationale: Ensure any impact and required mitigation needs associated with the existing Campbellford Bridge
alternatives has been identified and assessed so that this information can be compared against the impact
assessment carried out for the Second Street/Alma Street alternative.
Existing Documentation: New information collected in Task 3: Update/Expand Inventories
Sub-Tasks:

Document any significant impacts and required mitigation measures required by the existing Campbellford
Bridge option;

Update capital cost estimates to 2012 dollars for the Campbellford Bridge and Second Street/Alma Street
alternatives; and

Update capital cost estimates for updated arterial road network improvements associated with the river
crossing alternatives.
Completion Schedule: April 30, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: A. Ortlieb, T. Brumfit, G. Kauffman
Deliverables: Updated Section 7.6 of the 2009 Draft ESR on mitigation measures and monitoring.
Budget: $5,600
TASK 10 – CONSULTATION: PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2
Rationale: Present the recommended design concept for the Trent River crossing and associated arterial road
network improvements. Invite agency, stakeholder and public feedback and comment.
Existing Documentation: new task
Sub-Tasks:

Circulate draft PIC exhibits and materials to Project Team and Steering Committee members prior to
finalization;
Page 16
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
TASK 10 – CONSULTATION: PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2

Finalize Public Information Centre date, time and location;

Finalize PIC exhibits, information handout, comment sheet, web page material and Notice of PIC;

Conduct PIC; and

Prepare PIC Summary Report including review of comments
Completion Schedule: week of May 20, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb, T. Brumfit
Deliverables: PIC materials, summary report and revised 2009 Draft ESR Section 5.0 and Appendix A.
Budget: $12,420
TASK 11 – SELECT AND FINALIZE PREFERRED DESIGN
Rationale: Considering public response to the recommended design concept presented at PIC #2, the study
Steering Committee will be asked to confirm the preferred design for inclusion in the ESR document.
Existing Documentation: 2009 ESR Section 7.0
2012 Trent River Crossing in Campbellford Feasibility Study Section 13:
Recommended Alternative
Sub-Tasks:

Consulting team and Project Team recommendation to Steering Committee; and

Steering Committee decision.
Completion Schedule: May 31, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley
Deliverables: New ESR section describing preferred design decision process and recommendation.
Budget: $6,600
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #4
Rationale: To review results of PIC #2 and how they relate to the confirmation of the preferred design.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Agenda and Minutes;

Draft PIC #2 Summary Report.
Completion Schedule: May 31, 2012
DECISION POINT #2
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb
Deliverables: Agenda and minutes; and
Draft PIC #2 Summary Report including public comments and draft responses.
Page 17
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #4
Budget: $3,600
EA PHASE 4: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT
TASK 12 – UPDATE ESR DOCUMENTATION
Rationale: The updated ESR document needs to be a stand-alone report. It will include a summary of all work
tasks conducted as part of the 2009 ESR and the 2012 Feasibility Study, with references to these documents
where required. This will be augmented with new updated and expanded information prepared as part of the
EA completion. This new ESR will cover all topics and with details on all changes since the 2009 report,
including summaries of previous findings that do not change. The 2009 and 2012 reports will be separate
documents.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR
July 2012 Trent River Crossing In Campbellford Feasibility Study
Sub-Tasks:

First Draft ESR for Project Team and Steering Committee review;

Final Draft ESR for project Team and Steering Committee review including approval recommendation to
County and Municipality Councils; and

Reconfirm federal EA requirements and commitments for the study.
Completion Schedule: June 14, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb
Deliverables: Final Draft ESR and associated new technical appendices
Budget: $18,150
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #5
Rationale: To review the first Draft ESR with the project Team, and the final Draft ESR with the project Team
and Steering Committee.
Existing Documentation: None
Sub-Tasks:

Agenda and Minutes;

First Draft ESR preparation and editing; and

Final Draft ESR preparation.
Completion Schedule: week of June 24, 2013
DECISION POINT #3
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley, A. Ortlieb
Deliverables: Agenda and minutes; and
First Draft ESR; and
Final Draft ESR.
Page 18
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
PROJECT TEAM / STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #5
Budget: $3,600
TASK 13 – PRESENTATION FOR APPROVAL / NOTICE OF STUDY COMPLETION PUBLIC REVIEW
Rationale: The Municipal Class EA requires a mandatory notice of study completion prior to fling the ESR and
completing the process. A minimum 30 day public review period is also mandatory following the notice, when
any person or party with an unresolved issue can request the Minister of the Environment to enact a Part II
Order to upgrade the EA process to that of a more rigorous Individual EA.
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR
July 2012 Trent River Crossing In Campbellford Feasibility Study
Sub-Tasks:

Presentation to Councils with Steering Committee recommendation to post Notice of Study Completion;

Minimum 30-day public review period and response to public input;

If no Part II Order request is made, file the ESR following the review period to complete the EA process.

NOTE: This task does not include response to or negotiation with any Part II Order requester since the
number and natural of any possible requests are not known at this time.
Completion Schedule: June 28 – July 31, 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley
Deliverables: Final ESR document with new technical appendices
Budget: $4,600
TASK 14 – PROJECT FILING
Rationale: Complete the Municipal Class EA process by filing the approved ESR with the Environmental
Assessment Branch, Ministry of the Environment
Existing Documentation: August 2009 Final Draft ESR
July 2012 Trent River Crossing In Campbellford Feasibility Study
Sub-Tasks:

Write filing letter; and

Reconfirm federal EA commitments which may include preparation of a Project Description to the
responsible Authority
Completion Schedule: August 2013
Key Staff Assignment: D. Drackley
Deliverables: Filing letter, final ESR document and potential Project Description
Budget: $2,000
Page 19
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
3.
EA COMPLETION SCHEDULE
The following study schedule has the Detailed Work Plan approved by County Council at their
regular meeting on November 21, 2012. Completion of the four EA phases is then scheduled to
extent eight months to the end of June when County and Municipality Councils will be asked to
approve the Final Draft ESR document and issue the Notice of Study Completion. The minimum
30-day public review period extends to the end of July, at which time the ESR documentation will be
filed with MOE to complete the EA process.
Page 20
Project Schedule
Completion of the Trent River Crossing and Arterial Roadway Network Environmental Assessment
TASKS ( see Work Plan):
2012
November December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
PHASE 1: PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY
Task 1
Preliminary Consultation
Task 2
Consultation: Community Outreach
Task 3
11/21
Update Problem/Opportunity Statement
3A
Updated Traffic Data Collection
3B
Updated Existing Arterial Road Network Traffic Conditions
3C
Travel Origin-Destination Survey
3D
Update Traffic Forecasts
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #1
PHASE 2: ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Task 4
Update / Expand Inventories
Task 5
Update Alternative Solutions and Evaluation
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #2
Task 6
Task 7
Consultation PIC #1
Confirm Preferred Solution
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #3
PHASE 3: PREFERRED SOLUTION ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS
Task 8
Evaluate Alternative Design Concepts for Final Preferred Solution
Task 9
Detailed Inventory for Final Preferred Solution
Task 10 Consultation PIC #2
Task 11 Select & Finalize Preferred Design
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #4
PHASE 4: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT (ESR)
Task 12 Update ESR Documentation
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #5
Task 13 Presentation for Approval/Notice of Completion/Public Review
Min 30 Day Review
Task 14 Project Filing
Critical Decision Points
August
IBI GROUP DRAFT REPORT
Detailed Work Plan
Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network EA
4.
EA COMPLETION BUDGET
The budget required to complete this Detailed Work Plan is tabulated in the following budget
spreadsheet which includes the following major cost items:
FEES
DISBURSEMENTS
TOTAL
Phase 1: Problem or Opportunity
$66,050
$5,000 Paid Duty OPP
$5,125 OD Survey Expenses
$5,250 Traffic Counts
$81,425
Phase 2: Alternative Solutions
$72,420
$12,360 LGL Ltd.
$ 3,500 Archaeoworks Inc.
$ 7,000 J. Chandler
$95,280
Phase 3: Preferred Solution
Alternative Design Concepts
$43,620
$43,620
Phase 4: Environmental Study
Report
$28,350
$28,350
$8,000 Travel & Reproduction
$8,000
PROJECT COST excluding HST
$210,440
$46,235
$256,675
Allowance for Part II Order
Management
$15,000
$1,000
$16,000
TOTAL COST excluding HST
$272,675
An allowance to manage responses to Part II Order requests (maximum 5) has been included in the
Total Cost. This will ensure that funds are available for the consulting team to assist the County in
having any Part II Order requests resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the County and the
requestor, with the goal of having the requests withdrawn.
Page 21
COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND
Detailed Work Plan Budget
Consulting Services for the Completion of the Trent River Crossing and Arterial Road Network Environmental Assessment
Total Hours
20
IBI GROUP
Mori
PROJECT PHASES / TASKS
304
Drackley
Hrs
Hrs
146
Ortlieb
61
Brumfit
Hrs
136
Johnston
Hrs
Hrs
230
Dela Cruz
Hrs
125
Hwang
30
Lang
Hrs
124
Radue
Hrs
50
Tech I
Hrs
350
Tech II
Hrs
70
Surveyor
Hrs
Hrs
30
1676
Admin
Hrs
TOTAL TASK
COST
Total Hrs
PHASE 1: PROBLEM OR OPPORTUNITY
Task 1 - Preliminary Consultation
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
30
$4,000.00
Task 2 - Consultation: Community Outreach
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
$10,000.00
Task 3 - Updated Problem/Opportunity Statement
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0.00
Task 3A - Updated Traffic Data Collection
0
2
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
$3,000.00
Task 3B - Updated Existing Arterial Road Network Traffic Conditions
0
2
0
0
20
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
62
$7,000.00
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeing #1
0
10
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
$3,950.00
Task 3C - Travel Origin-Destination Survey
5
5
0
0
45
0
60
0
0
50
70
70
0
305
$29,350.00
Task 3D - Update Traffic Forecasts
5
2
0
0
20
0
25
0
0
0
25
0
0
77
$8,750.00
10
81
0
0
120
0
125
0
20
50
95
70
0
571
$66,050.00
Task 4 - Update / Expand Inventories
0
15
0
0
0
40
0
30
0
0
50
0
0
135
$14,900.00
Task 5 - Update Alternative Solutions and Evaluation
0
25
20
15
0
60
0
0
0
0
145
0
0
265
$28,800.00
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #2
0
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
$5,600.00
Task 6 - Consultation PIC #1
2
20
8
8
8
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
76
$11,420.00
Trask 7 - Confirm Preferred Solution
2
10
10
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
$6,100.00
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #3
0
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
$5,600.00
4
90
58
43
8
120
0
30
30
0
195
0
0
578
$72,420.00
Task 8 - Evaluate Alternative Design Concepts for Final Preferred Solution
0
10
20
10
0
50
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
130
$15,400.00
Task 9 - Detailed Inventory for Final Preferred Solution
0
10
10
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
$5,600.00
Task 10 - Consultation PIC #2
2
25
8
8
8
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
81
$12,420.00
Task 11 - Select & Finalize Preferred Design
0
15
10
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
$6,600.00
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #4
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
$3,600.00
2
70
58
18
8
90
0
0
30
0
40
0
0
316
$43,620.00
Task 12 - Update ESR Documentation
4
30
20
0
0
20
0
0
40
0
0
0
30
144
$18,150.00
Project Team / Steering Committee Meeting #5
0
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
$3,600.00
Task 13 - Presentation for Approval/Notice of Completion/Public Review
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
35
$4,600.00
Task 14 - Project Filing
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
12
$2,000.00
4
63
30
0
0
20
0
0
44
0
20
0
30
211
$28,350.00
Subtotal
PHASE 2: ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Subtotal
PHASE 3: PREFERRED SOLUTION ALTERNATIVE DESIGN CONCEPTS
Subtotal
PHASE 4: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT (ESR)
Subtotal
PROJECT MANAGEMENT (included above)
TOTAL FEES
TOTAL HOURS
DISBURSEMENTS
TOTAL COST (excluding HST)
$210,440.00
1676
$46,235
$256,675.00
Disbursements:
LGL Limited, Natural Environment
Archaeoworks Inc.
J. Chandler, Air Quality
OPP Paid Duty
OD Survey Expenses/Contingency
Traffic Data Collection 15 locations
Travel
Reproduction
IBI Group
$12,360
$3,500
$7,000
$5,000
$5,125
$5,250
$4,000
$4,000
$46,235