The basis of momentum criteria for flare system

advertisement
Upgrade
Chemwork
Discussions
1,188 members
Members
Search
 
Manage
Basis of Momentum Criteria for Flare System
Learn Syan Lee
Process Design Engineer
Top Contributors in this Group
Dear friends,

Follow Learn Syan
As per clause 6.5.1 of NORSOK Standard P-001 (Process Design), "all flare lines
shall be designed to keep the rho.v2 < 200,000 kg/m.s2 criteria (where rho is the
fluid density or mixed density for two phase conditions in kg/m3 and v is the
velocity in m/s)."
As per clause 13.5.1 of TOTAL GS EP ECP 103 (Process Sizing Criteria), "(flare)
headers: 0.7 Mach max and rho.v2 < 150,000 Pa considering the maximum flow
rate due to process limitations."
Appreciate if anyone from the group can shed some light regarding the following
queries:
Ghasem Bashiri
Process Lead Engineer at EIED
Unfollow Ghasem
See all members 
Your group contribution level
Getting close! Reach the next level and you
could get featured on the group homepage.
• Basis of limiting flare system momentum to < 150,000 or < 200,000 kg/m.s2. Is it
based on industrial experience or experimental results to maintain mechanical
integrity of piping?
• If the estimated momentum exceeds 200,000 kg/m.s2 (say 250,000 kg/m.s2) due
to tie-in of a higher flare load to an existing system, what is the implication of
exceeding the momentum criteria (e.g. excessive piping vibration)? Is it mandatory
to increase the tie-in line size or can it be considered acceptable by providing
proper supports/bracings since relief load to flare system is considered as
intermittent service?
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience and thoughts on this topic.
Regards,
Syan
Like (1) Comment (4) Share Follow Reply Privately 12 months ago
Add to Manager's Choice Close Discussion
Comments
 Vinay Kumar likes this
 4 comments
S M Kumar
Process Design Consultant
SM
Syan: Please google FIV Study + AIV Study. Flow Induced vibration/ Acoustic Induced Vibration
and read all about it. Usually branch connections break and release HC inside the plant, rather
than take it all the way to flare tip.
Like (1) Reply privately Delete 12 months ago
 Azhar Ali likes this
Mohd Fitri bin Mohd Lias
Process Engineer at MMC Oil and Gas Engineering Sdn. Bhd
hi, you may refer to aiv assesment and protection guideline by energy institute. its help
Mohd Fitri
Like (1) Reply privately Delete 12 months ago
 Azhar Ali likes this
Building influence
Ads By LinkedIn Members
Fire Prevention Services
Automatic sprinkler design,
installation and maintenance services.
SHEQ Software
Manage your Quality, Environmental,
Health and Safety performance
Chemical Process Software
Engineered for hundreds of industryspecific processes. Try CHEMCAD
free.
Latest Activity
Feroz shaikh joined a group:
Chemwork
Chemwork
Discussion
Forum
11h ago
Paramasivam CEng AMIE
commented on a discussion in
Chemwork. Ghasem Bashiri
Parallel Flare Dear Experts Is
it possible to have parallel
Flare due to very large Relief
Rate. Within a project we exposed to a
very large Relief rate from upstream
(1600 ton/hr). we know that such rate
should be... more
12h ago
Arun kumar
Senior Process Engineer at Saipem
Arun
Hi, Syan The criteria holds good only for the single phase, not for two phase flow. More over if the
rho.v2 is higher you will have to given more concrete support for the vibrationa and has a
tremendours impact on the welded joints.
As a good practise you can go upto 1 mach in tail Pipes, but not on the Sub-header and Main
Headers.
Check for the conditions at the main header and sub-header and speak to your piping department
for the inputs on the cost of support, generally this has a huge financial Impact. For these reasons
we recommend the limits.
More over check for the generally Line sizing criteria. for the lines for two phase.
PERVAIZ RIZVI commented on a discussion in
Chemwork. Felipe D. Methanol as hydrate
inhibitor - Regeneration and Recovery
Process Dear all, Could anyone tell me
more about the process of recovery and
regeneration of methanol used as hydrate inhinitor
on offshore natural gas platforms. I intend to run a
simulation on hysys of... more
13h ago
Like (1) Reply privately Delete 12 months ago
See all activity
 Vinay Kumar likes this
About
Frank Petz
research at Consultant
Frank
Privacy & Terms
LinkedIn Corp. © 2014
as said by others these values are related to maximum stress and vibrations on lines,
for single and two phase
F = P*A + Rho*A*V^2 / g
gives the force on a specified section, there is a static (P*A) and dynamic (Rho*A*V^2 / g)
contribute,
since you know the mass flow and conditions (for a PSV I simulate as isentropic nozzle with
PRODE PROPERTIES) you can calculate density and velocity,
for two phase I generally prefer the HEM model (i.e. gas and liquid traveling at the same speed
and at equilibria),
from the above you can calculate the maximum stress,
for mach number you need the two-phase speed of sound,
again you can calculate the speed of sound for two phase flow with a simulator (I use PRODE
PROPERTIES) and then calculate the mach number
Like (1) Reply privately Delete 11 months ago
 Vinay Kumar likes this
Add a comment...
 Send me an email for each new comment.
Feedback
Add Comment
Download