ADDITIONAL SOURCES
GENDER, TECHNOLOGY, AND INFORMATION
GRS 390J/WGS 393
Unique Number #63750
Dr. Hillary Hart
Dr. Philip Doty
College of Engineering
School of Information
University of Texas at Austin
SP 2006
Class URL: http://courses.ischool.utexas.edu/Doty/2006/spring/GRS390J/
1
The required readings for the course are listed in the syllabus at the course Web site. What
follows are additional readings that you may find useful in the study of gender, technology, and
information.
Selected additional sources
Alexander, Ilene D. (2004). Building literacy into courses: Syllabus and pedagogical
considerations. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 32(1 & 2), 272-284.
Allan, Graham, & Crow, Graham (1990). Constructing the domestic sphere: The emergence of
the modern home in post-war Britain. In Helen Corr & Lynn Jamieson (Eds.), Politics of everyday
life: Continuity and change in work and family (pp. 11-36). London: Macmillan.
Appadurai, Arjun. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In Arjun
Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3-63). Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Appadurai, Arjun. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, Erik, & Burr, Lesley. (1985). Housework and the appliance of science. In Wendy
Faulkner & Erik Arnold (Eds.), Smothered by invention: Technology in women’s lives. London:
Pluto.
Augst, Thomas, & Wiegand, Wayne A. (Eds.). (2002). Libraries as agencies of culture. Madison,
WI: University of Wisconsin. Reprint of Augst, Thomas, & Wiegand, Wayne A. (Eds.). (2001).
The library as an agency of culture [special issue]. American Studies, 42(3).
Baehr, Helen, & Dyer, Gillian. (1987). Boxed in: Women and television. London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul.
Balsamo, Anne. (1995). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham, NC:
Duke University.
Barad, Karen. (1998). Getting real: Performativity, materiality, and technoscientific practices.
differences, 10(2), 87-128.
Barad, Karen. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific
practices. In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1-11). New York: Routledge.
(Original published 1998)
Baran, B. (1987). The technological transformation of white-collar work: A case study of the
insurance industry. In Heidi I. Hartmann, Robert E. Kraut, & Louise A. Tilly (Eds.), Computer
chips and paper clips: Technology and women’s employment (vol. 2, pp. 23-62). Washington, DC:
National Academy.
Basalla, George. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press.
2
Bender, Gretchen, & Druckery, Timothy. (Eds.). (1994). Culture on the brink: Ideologies of
technology. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
Beniger, James R. (1984). The control revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Biagioli, Mario. (Ed.). (1999). The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.
Biagioli, Mario, Reid, Roddey, & Traweek, Sharon. (Eds.). (1994). Located knowledge: Intersections
between science, gender, and cultural studies [special issue]. Configurations, 2(1).
Bijker, Wiebe E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, Thomas B., & Pinch, Trevor J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of
technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA:
MIT.
Bijker, Wiebe E., & Law, John. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in
sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Blair, Kristine, &Takayoshi, Pamela. (1999). Feminist cyberspaces: Mapping gendered academic
spaces. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Bose, Christine E., Bereano, Philip L., & Malloy, Mary. (1984). Household technology and the
social construction of housework. Technology and Culture, 25(1), 53-82.
Callahan, Ewa. (2004). Interface design and culture. In Blaise Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of
information science and technology (Vol. 39, pp. 257-310). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
Callon, Michel, Law, John, & Rip, Arie. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and
technology: Sociology of science in the real world. London: MacMillan.
Callon, Michel. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological
analysis. In Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas B. Hughes, & Trevor J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of
technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 83-103).
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Canel, Annie, Oldenziel, Ruth, & Zachman, Karin (Eds.). (2000). Crossing boundaries, building
bridges: Comparing the history of women engineers, 1870s-1990s. London: Harwood Academic.
Cardwell, Donald. (1995). The Norton history of technology. New York: W.W. Norton.
Carey, James W., & Quirk, John J. (1970a). The mythos of the electronic revolution – Part I.
American Scholar, 39(1), 219-241.
Carey, James W., & Quirk, John J. (1970b). The mythos of the electronic revolution – Part II.
American Scholar, 39(2), 395-424.
Ceruzzi, Paul. (1991). When computers were human. Annals of the history of computing, 13(3),
237-244.
3
Chandler, Alfred D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business.
Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Clark, Adele, & Montini, Teresa. (1993). The many faces of RU486: Tales of situated knowledge
and technological contestations. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18(1), 42-78.
Clarke, Alison J. (1998). Window shopping at home: Classifieds, catalogues and new consumer
skills. In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Material cultures: Why some things matter (pp. 73-99). Chicago:
University of Chicago.
Cockburn, Cynthia. (1983). Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto.
Cockburn, Cynthia. (1988). Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technical know-how. Boston:
Northeastern University.
Cockburn, Cynthia, & Ormrod, Susan. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. London:
Sage.
Cockburn, Cynthia, & Fürst-Diliç, Rúza. (Eds.). (1994). Bringing technology home: Gender and
technology in a changing Europe. Buckingham, UK: Open University.
Collins, Harry, & Kusch, Martin. (1998). The shape of action: What humans and machines can do.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Collins, Harry, & Pinch, Trevor. (1998). The golem at large: What you should know about technology.
New York: Cambridge University.
Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Coombe, Rosemary J. (1994). Author/iszing the celebrity: Publicity rights, postmodern politics,
and unauthorized genders. In Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of
authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 101-132). Durham, NC: Duke
University.
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. (1976). The “Industrial Revolution” in the home: Household technology
and social change in the 20th century. Technology and Culture, 17(1), 1-24.
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. (1979). From Virginia Dare to Virginia Slims: Women and technology in
American life. Technology and Culture, 20(1), 51-63.
Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technologies from the
open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
Crompton, Rosemary, & Jones, Gareth. (1984). White-collar proletariat: Deskilling and gender in
clerical work. London: Macmillan.
Deem, R. (Ed.). (1980). Schooling for women’s work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Downey, Gary, & Dumit, Joseph. (Eds.). (1997). Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions
in the emerging sciences and technologies. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
4
Edwards, Paul N. (1996). The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war
America. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Ehrenreich, Barbara, & English, Deirdre. (2005). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to
women (2nd ed.). New York: Anchor.
Eisenstein, Hester. (1984). Contemporary feminist thought. London: Allen and Unwin.
Elger, T. (1987). Review article: Flexible futures? New technology and the contemporary
transformation of work. Work, Employment and Society, 1(4), 528-540.
Ellul, Jacques. (1964). The technological society (trans. J. Wilkinson). New York: Knopf.
Ellul, Jacques. (1990). The technological bluff (trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley). Grand Rapids, MI:
William B. Eerdmans.
Engeström, Yrjö. (1990). When is a tool? Multiple meanings of artifacts in human activity. In
Yrjö Engeström (Ed.), Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory (pp. 171195). Helsinki: Konsutit Og.
Enloe, Cynthia H. (1983). Does khaki become you?: The militarisation of women’s lives. London:
Pluto.
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New
Haven, CT: Yale University.
Faulkner, Wendy, & Arnold, Erik. (Eds.). (1985). Smothered by invention: Technology in women’s
lives. London: Pluto.
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New
York: Basic.
Fee, Elizabeth. (1981). Women’s nature and scientific objectivity. In Marian Lowe & Ruth
Hubbard (Eds.), Women’s nature: Rationalizations of inequality (pp. 9-27). New York: Pergamon.
Fischer, Claude. (1988). “Touch someone”: The telephone industry discovers sociability.
Technology and Culture, 29(1), 32-61.
Fischer, Claude S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley, CA:
University of California.
Fishman, Jennifer R. (2004). Manufacturing desire: The commodification of female sexual
dysfunction. Social Studies of Science, 34(2), 187-218.
Fraser, Nancy. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Fritz, W. Barkley. (1996). The women of ENIAC. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 18(3),
13-28.
Galison, Peter. (1994). The ontology of the enemy: Norbert Wiener and the cybernetic vision.
Critical Inquiry, 21(1), 228-265.
5
Gattiker, Urs E. (1994). Women and technology. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Gere, Anne Ruggles. (1994). Common properties of pleasure: Texts in nineteenth century
women’s clubs. In Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship:
Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 383-400). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Gershuny, Jonathan. (1978). After industrial society: The emerging self-service economy. London:
Macmillan.
Gordon, Linda Perlman. (1977). Woman’s body, woman’s right: A social history of birth control in
America. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
de Grazia, Victoria, & Furlough, Ellen. (Eds.). (1996). Sex of things: Gender and consumption in
historical perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Green, Eileen, Owen, Jenny, & Pain, Den. (1993). Gendered by design?: Information technology and
office systems. London: Taylor & Francis.
Greenbaum, Joan. (1979). In the name of efficiency: Management theory and shopfloor practices in data
processing work. Philadelphia: Temple University.
Griffiths, Dorothy. (1985). The exclusion of women from technology. In Wendy Faulkner & Erik
Arnold (Eds.), Smothered by invention: Technology in women’s lives (pp. 51-71). London: Pluto.
Grunberg, Gérald, & Giffard, Alain. (1993). New orders of knowledge, new technologies of
reading. In R. Howard Bloch & Carla Hesse (Eds.), Future libraries (pp. 80-93). Berkeley, CA:
University of California.
Hacker, Sally L. (1981). The culture of engineering: Woman, workplace and machine. Women’s
Studies International Quarterly, 4(4), 341-353.
Hacker, Sally L. (1990). “Doing it the hard way”: Investigations of gender and technology. Boston:
Unwin Hyman.
Hakken, David. (1999). Cyborgs@cyberspace?: An ethnographer looks to the future. New York:
Routledge.
Haraway, Donna J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and the nature of modern science. New
York: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York:
Routledge.
Haraway, Donna J. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for
inappropriate(d) others. In Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, & Paula A. Treichler (eds.),
Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). New York: Routledge.
Harding, Sandra. (1986). The instability of the analytic categories of feminist theory. Signs, 11(4),
645-664.
6
Harding, Sandra. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University.
Hardyment, Christina. (1988). From mangle to microwave: The mechanization of the household.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hartman, Mary, & Banner, Lois. (Ed.). (1976). Clio’s consciousness raised. New York: Harper &
Row.
Hartmann, H., Kraut, Robert, & Tilly, L. (Eds.). (1986, 1987). Computer chips and paper clips:
Technology and women’s employment (vols. 1 and 2). Washington, DC: National Academy.
Hartouni, Valerie. (1997). Cultural conceptions: On reproductive technologies and the remaking of life.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Hartsock, Nancy. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically
feminist historical materialism. In Sandra Harding & Merrill B. Hinitkka (Eds.), Discovering
reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science (pp.
283-310). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hawthorne, Susan, & Klein, Renate. (1999). Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, critique and creativity.
North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex.
Hayden, Dolores. (1980). Redesigning the domestic workplace. In Gerda R. Wekerle, Rebecca
Peterson, & David Morley (Eds.), New space for women. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Hayden, Dolores. (1982). The grand domestic revolution: A history of feminist designs for American
homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hayden, Dolores. (2002). Redesigning the American dream: Gender, housing, and family life (Rev.
and expanded ed.). New York: Norton. (Original published 1984)
Henderson, Kathryn. (1996). The visual culture of engineers. In Susan Leigh Star (Ed.), The
cultures of computing (pp. 196-218). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Henwood, F. (1993). Establishing gender perspectives on information technology: Problems,
issues and opportunities. In Eileen Green, Jenny Owen, & Den Pain, Gendered by design?:
Information technology and office systems (pp. 31-49). London: Taylor & Francis.
Herzig, Rebecca. (2004). On performance, productivity, and vocabularies of motive in recent
studies of science. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 127-147.
Hiley, David R., Bohman, James F., & Shusterman, Richard. (1991). The interpretive turn:
Philosophy, science, culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Homans, Hilary. (Ed.). (1985). The sexual politics of reproduction. London: Gower.
Hopkins, Patrick D. (1999). Sex/machine: Readings in culture, gender, and technology. Bloomington,
IN: Indiana University.
Horowitz, Roger, & Mohun, Arwen. (Eds.). (1998). His and hers: Gender, consumption, and
technology. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
7
Hughes, Thomas P. (1989). American genesis: A century of invention and technological enthusiasm.
New York: Viking.
Hughes, Thomas P. (1999). The evolution of large technological systems [abridged]. In Mario
Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 202-223). New York: Routledge. (Original published
1987; abridged 1998)
Hughes, Thomas P. (2004). Human-built world: How to think about technology and culture. Chicago:
University of Chicago.
Hutchins, Edwin. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hynes, Patricia H. (Ed.). (1991). Reconstructing Babylon: Essays on women and technology.
Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana.
Jarman, Neil. (1998). Material of culture, fabric of identity. In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Material
cultures: Why some things matter (pp. 121-145). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jaszi, Peter. (1994). On the author effect: Contemporary copyright and collective creativity. In
Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in
law and literature (pp. 29-56). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Kasson, John F. (1999). Civilizing the machine: Technology and republican values in America, 17761900. New York: Hill and Wang. (Original published 1976)
Keller, Evelyn Fox. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. (1992). Secrets of life, secrets of death: Essays on language, gender, and science.
New York: Routledge.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. (1999). The gender/science system: Or, is sex to gender as nature is to
science? In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 234-242). New York: Routledge.
(Original published 1987)
Keller, Evelyn Fox, & Longino, Helen E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminism and science. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University.
Kelly, A. (Ed.). (1981). The missing half: Girls and science education. Manchester, UK: Manchester
University.
Kerber, Linda. (1988). Separate spheres, female worlds, woman’s place: The rhetoric of women’s
history. Journal of American History, 75(1), 9-39.
Kevles, Bettyann Holtzmann. (1997). Naked to the bone: Medical imaging in the twentieth century.
New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
Kidder, Tracy. (1982). The soul of a new machine. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Kingery, W. David (Ed.). (1996). Learning from things: Methods and theory of material culture
studies. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
8
Kling, Rob. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The
contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232. Also available at
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/utis/2000/00000016/00000003;jsessionid=1m0
eji43lawmt.henrietta
Knoblauch, C.H., & Brannon, Lil. (1993). Critical teaching and the idea of literacy. Portsmouth, NH:
Reed Publishing.
Kraft, Philip. (1977). Programmers and managers: The routinization of computer programming in the
United States. New York: Springer Verlag.
Kraft, Philip. (1979). The routinization of computer programming. Sociology of Work and
Occupations, 6, 139-155.
Kramarae, Cheris. (Ed.). (1988). Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch. New York:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kranakis, Eda. (1989). Social determinants of engineering practice: A comparative view of
France and America in the nineteenth century. Social Studies of Science, 19(1), 5-70.
Kubler, George. (1962). The shape of time: Remarks on the history of things. New Haven, CT: Yale
University.
Latour, Bruno. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge
and society: Studies in the sociology of culture past and present (Vol. 6, pp. 1-40). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Latour, Bruno. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Latour, Bruno, & Woolgar, Steve. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Lave, Jean. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Étienne. (1992). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Law, John. (1987). Review article: The structure of sociotechnical engineering – A review of the
new sociology of technology. The Sociological Review, 35(2), 404-425.
Lee, Josie Laurite. (2004). Literacy practices: An alternative definition for women-focused
institutions, pedagogy, and research. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 32(1 & 2), 28-42.
Lenoir, Timothy. (Ed.). (1998). Inscribing scientific texts and the materiality of communication.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Leonard, Eileen B. (2002). Women, technology, and the myth of progress. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
9
Lerman, Nina E., Mohun, Arwen Palmer, & Oldenziel, Ruth. (1997). Versatile tools: Gender
analysis and the history of technology. Technology and Culture, 38(1), 1-8.
Lerman, Nina E., Oldenziel, Ruth, & Mohun, Arwen P. (2003a). Gender & technology: A reader.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Levy, David M. (2003). Documents and libraries: A sociotechnical perspective. In Ann Peterson
Bishop, Nancy Van House, & Barbara P. Buttenfield (Eds.), Digital library use: Social practice in
design and evaluation (pp. 25-42). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Lewis, Linda H. (1987). Females and computers: Fostering involvement. In Barbara Drygulski
Wright (Ed.), Women, work, and technology (pp. 268-280). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Leys Stepan, Nancy. (1996). Race and gender: The role of analogy in science. In Evelyn Fox
Keller & Helen E. Longino (Eds.), Feminism and science (pp. 121-136). Oxford, UK: Oxford
University.
Lindqvist, Svante. (1984). Technology on trial: The introduction of steam power technology into
Sweden. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Lipartito, Kenneth. (1994). When women were switches: Technology, work, and gender in the
telephone industry, 1890-1920. American Historical Review, 99(4), 1075-1111.
Long, Elizabeth. (2003). Book clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago:
University of Chicago.
Longino, Helen. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Lubar, Steven, & Kingery, W. David. (Eds.). (1993). History from things: Essays on material
culture. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Lublin, Nancy. (1998). Pandora’s box: Feminism confronts reproductive technology. Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield.
Lunsford, Andrea A., & Ede, Lisa. (1994). Collaborative authorship and the teaching of writing.
In Martha Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in
law and literature (pp. 417-438). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Lupton, Ellen. (1993). Mechanical brides: Women and machines from home to office. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University.
Mack, Pamela. (2001). What difference has feminism made to engineering in the twentieth
century? In Angela N.H. Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck, & Londa Schiebinger (Eds.), Feminism in
twentieth-century science, technology, and medicine (pp. 149-164). Chicago: University of Chicago.
MacKenzie, Donald. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
MacKenzie Donald, & Wajcman, Judy. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology.
Birmingham, UK: Open University.
10
Maines, Rachel P. (1999). The technology of orgasm: “Hysteria,” the vibrator, and women’s sexual
satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Marcus, George. (Ed.). (1995). Technoscientific imaginaries. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Margolis, M. (1985). Mothers and such: Views of American women and why they changed. Berkeley,
CA: University of California.
Margolis, Jane, & Fisher, Allan. (2001). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge,
MA: MIT.
Martin, C. Dianne. (1993). The myth of the awesome thinking machine. Communications of the
ACM, 36(4), 120-133.
Martin, Emily. (1992). The end of the body? American Ethnologist, 19(1), 121-140.
Martin, Emily. (1996). Flexible bodies: Tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio
to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon.
Martin, Michele. (1991). “Hello Central?”: Gender, technology, and culture in the formation of
telephone systems. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University.
Marvin, Carolyn. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in
the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University.
Marx, Leo. (1964). The machine in the garden: Technology and the pastoral ideal in America. New
York: Oxford University.
Marx, Leo. (1988). The pilot and the passenger: Essays on literature, technology and culture in the
United States. New York: Oxford University.
Marx, Leo. (1990). Does improved technology mean progress? In Albert H. Teich (Ed.),
Technology and the future (5th ed.; pp. 3-14). New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Original published
1987)
Massey, Doreen. (1995). Masculinity, dualisms and high technology. Transactions of the Institute
of British Geographers, 20(4), 487-500.
McGaw, Judith A. (1982). Women and the history of American technology: Review essay.
Signs, 7(4), 798-828.
McGaw, Judith A. (1989). No passive victims, no separate spheres: A feminist perspective on
technology’s history. In Stephen Cutliffe & Robert Post (Eds.), In context: History and the history of
technology (pp. 172-191). Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
McGaw, Judith A. (1997). Review essay: Inventors and other great women: Toward a feminist
history of technological luminaries. Technology and Culture, 38(1), 214-231.
McIlwee, Judith S., & Robinson, J. Gregg. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and
workplace culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
McNeil, Maureen. (Ed.). (1987). Gender and expertise. London: Free Association Books.
11
McNeil, Maureen, Varcoe, Ian, & Yearley, Steven. (Eds.). (1990). The new reproductive
technologies. London: MacMillan.
Miles, Ian. (1988). Home informatics: Information technology and the transformation of everyday life.
London: Pinter.
Millar, Melanie Stewart. (1998). Cracking the gender code: Who rules the wired world? Toronto:
Second Story.
Miller, Daniel. (1998). Why some things matter. In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Material cultures: Why
some things matter (pp. 3-21). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Miller, Daniel. (Ed.). (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. Chicago: University of
Chicago.
Miller, Mev. (2004). Editorial. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 32(1 & 2), 6-27.
Moore, Henrietta. (1990). Paul Ricoeur: Action, meaning and text. In Christopher Tilley (Ed.),
Reading material culture: Structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism (pp. 85-120). Oxford,
UK: Blackwell.
Morgan, Konrad, Brebbia, C.A., Sanchez, J., & Voiskounsky, A. (Eds.). (2004). Human
perspectives in the Internet society: Culture, psychology and gender. Southampton, UK: WIT.
Morison, Elting. (1966). Men, machines, and modern times. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Morison, Elting. (1974). From know-how to nowhere. New York: Basic Books.
Morton, Donald. (1999). Birth of the cyberqueer. In Jenny Wolmark (Ed.), Cybersexualities: A
reader on feminist theory, cyborgs, and cyberspace (pp. 295-313). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
Moyal, Ann. (1989). The feminine culture of the telephone. Prometheus, 7(1), 5-31.
Mulkay, Michael. (1979). Knowledge and utility: Implications for the sociology of knowledge.
Social Studies of Science, 9(1), 63-80.
Mumford, Lewis. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Nagel, Thomas. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
Nardi, Bonnie A., & O’Day, Vicki L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Nelson, Lynn H., Nelson, Jack. (Eds.). (1996). Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science.
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Noble, David F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology and the rise of corporate capitalism.
New York: Knopf.
Noble, David F. (1984). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University.
12
Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social meanings of a new technology, 1880-1940.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Nye, David E. (1994). American technological sublime. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Oakley, Ann. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. New York:
The New Press.
Oldenziel, Ruth. (1996). Objection/ions: Technology, culture, and gender. In W. David Kingery
(Ed.), Learning from things: Methods and theory of material culture studies (pp. 55-69). Washington,
DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Oldenziel, Ruth. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in
America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University.
Olsen, Bjørnar. (1990). Roland Barthes: From sign to text. In Christopher Tilley (Ed.), Reading
material culture: Structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism (pp. 163-205). Oxford, UK:
Blackwell.
Olson, Linda, & Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. (Eds.). (2005). Voices in dialogue: Reading women in the
middle ages. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame.
Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality & literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.
Oudshoorn, Nelly, & Pinch, Trevor. (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users
and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Pacey, Arnold. (1983). The culture of technology. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Parker, Roszika. (1984). The subversive stitch: Embroidery and the making of the feminine. London:
Women’s Press.
Pearce, Susan M. (1992). Museums, objects and collections: A cultural study. Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution.
Pellegram, Andrea. (1998). The message in paper. In Daniel Miller (Ed.), Material cultures: Why
some things matter (pp. 103-120). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Petchesky, R. (1987). Foetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction.
In M. Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine. Cambridge, UK:
Polity Press.
Pickstone, John V. (2000). Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology and medicine.
Manchester, UK: Manchester University.
Pinch, Trevor J., & Bijker, Wiebe E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how
the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In Wiebe E.
Bijker, Thomas B. Hughes, & Trevor J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems:
New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13
Pool, Robert. (1997). Beyond engineering: How society shapes technology. New York: Oxford
University.
Prown, Jules David. (1996). Material/culture: Can the farmer and the cowman still be friends?
In W. David Kingery (Ed.), Learning from things: Methods and theory of material culture studies (pp.
19-27). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Pursell, Carroll W. (1990). Technology in America: A history of individuals and ideas (2nd ed.).
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Pursell, Carroll W. (1995). The machine in America: A social history of technology. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University.
Pursell, Carroll W. (Ed.). (2001a). American technology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Quimby, Ian M.G. (Ed.). (1978). Material culture and the study of American life. New York:
Norton.
Rakow, Lana F. (1988). Women and the telephone: The gendering of a communications
technology. In Cheris Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 207229). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rakow, Lana F. (1992). Gender on the line: Women, the telephone, and community life. Urbana, IL:
University of Illinois.
Rakusen, Jill, & Davidson, Nick. (1982). Out of our hands: What technology does to pregnancy.
London: Pan.
Ravetz, Alison. (1965). Modern technology and an ancient occupation: Housework in presentday society. Technology and Culture, 6(2), 256-260.
Ravetz, Alison. (1987). Housework and domestic technologies. In Maureen McNeil (Ed.), Gender
and expertise. London: Free Association Books.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test
tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Richards, Evelleen, & Schuster, John. (1989). The feminine method as myth and accounting
resource: A challenge to gender studies and social studies of science. Social Studies of Science,
19(4), 697-720.
Romanyshyn, Robert D. (1989). Technology as symptom and dream. New York: Routledge.
Rosser, Sue V. (Ed.). (1995). Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science,
mathematics, and engineering. New York: Teachers College.
Rossiter, Margaret W. (1992). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. (Original published 1982)
Rossiter, Margaret W. (1993). The Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325341.
14
Rossiter, Margaret W. (1995). Women scientists in America: Before affirmative action, 1940-1972.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Rothman, Barbara Katz. (1989). Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal
society. New York: W.W. Norton.
Rothschild, Joan. (Ed.). (1983). Machina ex dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. New York:
Pergamon.
Rothschild, Joan. (1988). Teaching technology from a feminist perspective. New York : Pergamon
Rothschild, Joan. (1989). From sex to gender in the history of technology. In Stephen H. Cutliffe
& Robert C. Post (Eds.), In context: History and the history of technology (pp. 192-203). Bethlehem,
PA: Lehigh University.
Rouse, Joseph. (1999). Understanding scientific practices: Cultural studies of science as a
philosophical program. In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 442-456). New York:
Routledge. (Original published 1998)
Sale, Kirkpatrick. (1995). Rebels against the future: The Luddites and their war on the Industrial
Revolution: Lessons for the computer age. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Scharff, Virginia. (1991). Taking the wheel: Women and the coming of the motor age. Albuquerque,
NM: University of New Mexico.
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. (1986). The railway journey: The industrialization of time and space in the
19th century. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Schön, Donald. (1983). From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. In The reflective
practitioner: How professionals think in action (pp. 21-69 and 357-359). New York: Basic Books.
Schön, Donald. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schuler, Douglas. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. New York: ACM.
Schuler, Douglas, & Namioka, Aki. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practice.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erblaum.
Scott, Joan W. (1999). Gender and the politics of history (rev. ed.). New York: Columbia
University.
Shade, Leslie Regan. (1998). Women and media bibliography. Available at
http://courseweb.edteched.uottawa.ca/cmn3104/bib.htm
Shade, Leslie Regan. (2002). Gender and community in the social construction of the Internet. New
York: Peter Lang.
Shapin, Steven. (1999). The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England. In Mario
Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 479-504). New York: Routledge. (Original published
1988)
15
Silverman, Eric Kline. (1990). Clifford Geertz: Towards a more “thick” understanding? In
Christopher Tilley (Ed.), Reading material culture: Structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism
(pp. 121-159). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Smith, Merritt Roe, & Marx, Leo. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of
technological determinism. Cambridge, MA: .
Spain, Daphne. (1992). Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Stanley, Autumn. (1993). Mothers and daughters of invention: Notes for a revised history of
technology. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
Star, Susan Leigh. (Ed.). (1995a). The cultures of computing. Oxford, UK: Blackwell..
Star, Susan Leigh. (Ed.). (1995b). Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology.
Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Star, S. Leigh, & Griesemer, James R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary
objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.
Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
Star, Susan Leigh, & Strauss, Anselm. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The dialogues
between visible and invisible work. Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1-2), 9-30.
Also available at http://www.kluweronline.com/article.asp?PIPS=161888&PDF=1
Staudenmaier, John M. (1985). Technology’s storytellers: Reweaving the human fabric. Cambridge,
MA: MIT.
Stein, D. (1985). Ada: A life and legacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stone, Allucquere R. (1996). The war of desire and technology at the end of the mechanical age.
Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Strom, Sharon Hartman. (1992). Beyond the typewriter: Gender, class, and the origins of modern
American office, 1900-1930. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Strasser, Susan. (1982). Never done: A history of American housework. New York: Pantheon.
Suchman, Lucy. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine
communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Suchman, Lucy, Blomberg, Jeanette, Orr, Julian E., & Trigg, Randall. (1999). Reconstructing
technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 392-408.
Sweetman, Caroline. (1999). Gender and technology. Oxford, UK: Oxfam.
Taylor, H. Jeanie, Kramarae, Cheris, & Ebben, Maureen. (Eds.). (1993). Women, information
technology, and scholarship. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Taylor, Robert S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College &
Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194.
16
Teich, Albert H. (Ed.). (1990). Technology and the future (5th ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Tenner, Edward. (1997). The computerized office: The revenge of the body. In Why things bite
back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences (pp. 206-234 and 392-396). New York:
Vintage Books. (Original published 1996)
Terry, Jennifer, & Calvert, Melodie. (Eds.). (1997). Processed lives: Gender and technology in
everyday life. New York: Routledge.
Tobey, Ronald C. (1996). Technology as freedom: The New Deal and the electrical modernization of the
American home. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Tone, Andrea. (2001). Devices and desire: A history of contraception in America. New York: Hill
and Wang.
Traweek, Sharon. (1999). Pilgrim’s progress: Male tales told during a life in physics [abridged].
In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 525-542). New York: Routledge. (Original
published 1988; abridged 1998)
Trescott, Martha Moore. (Ed.). (1979). Dynamos and virgins revisited: Women and technological
change in history. Methuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
Turkle, Sherry. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon &
Schuster
Turkle, Sherry. (1999). What are we thinking about when we are thinking about computers?
[abridged]. In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 543-552). New York: Routledge.
(Original published 1995; abridged 1998)
Ullman, Ellen. (1997). Close to the machine: Technophilia and its discontents. San Francisco: City
Light Books.
Vanek, Joann. (1974). Time spent on housework. Scientific American, 231(5), 116-120.
Van House, Nancy A. (2003). Science and technology studies and information studies. In Blaise
Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 38, pp. 3-86). Medford, NJ:
Information Today.
Wagner, Ina. (1993). Women’s voice: The case of nursing systems. AI and Society, 7(4), 295-310.
Wajcman, Judy. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State
University.
Wajcman, Judy. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Walshok, Mary. (1981). Blue collar women: Pioneers on the male frontier. Garden City, NY:
Anchor.
Walshok, Mary Lindenstein. (1990). Blue collar women. In Albert H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and
the future (5th ed.; pp. 288-296). New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Original published 1983)
17
Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation.
Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Wekerle, Gerda R., Peterson, Rebecca, & Morley, David. (Eds.). (1980). New space for women.
Boulder, CO: Westview.
van den Wijngaard, Marianne. (1997). Reinventing the sexes: The biomedical construction of
femininity and masculinity. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana.
Weinberg, Sandy. (1990). Expanding access to technology: Computer equity for women. In
Albert H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the future (5th ed.; pp. 277-287). New York: St. Martin’s
Press. (Original published 1987)
Williams, Rosalind. (1990). Notes on the underground: An essay on technology, society, and the
imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Winner, Langdon. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics out of control as a theme in political
thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Winner, Langdon. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
Winner, Langdon. (1986). The whale and the reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Winner, Langdon. (1990). The whale and the reactor. In Albert H. Teich (Ed.), Technology and the
future (5th ed.; pp. 262-276). New York: St. Martin’s Press. (Original published 1986)
Winterowk, W. Ross. (1989). The culture and politics of literacy. New York: Oxford University.
Wolmark, Jenny. (Ed.). (1999). Cybersexualities: A reader on feminist theory, cyborgs, and cyberspace.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
Woodmansee, Martha. (1994). On the author effect: Recovering collectivity. In Martha
Woodmansee & Peter Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and
literature (pp. 15-28). Durham, NC: Duke University.
Wosk, Julie. (2003). Women and the machine: Representations from the spinning wheel to the electronic
age. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Wright, Barbara Drygulski. (Ed.). (1987). Women, work, and technology: Transformations. Ann
Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Wylie, Alison. (1999). The engendering of archaeology: Refiguring feminist science studies
[abridged]. In Mario Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 553-567). New York: Routledge.
(Original published 1997; abridged 1998)
Yelland, Nicola, & Rubin, Andee. (2002). Ghosts in the machine: Women’s voices in research with
technology. New York: Peter Lang.
Ziman, John. (1968). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. London:
Cambridge University.
18
Ziman, John. (1984). An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of
science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Zimmerman, Jan. (Ed.). (1983). The technological woman: Interfacing with tomorrow. New York:
Praeger.
Zimmerman, Jan. (1986). Once upon the future: A woman’s guide to tomorrow’s technology. New
York: Pandora.
van Zoonen, Liesbet. (1992). Feminist theory and information technology. Media, Culture &
Society, 14(1), 9-30.
19