WORLD AFFAIRS Temple University Political Science 866 World Societies Theme Prof. J.S. Masker 429 Gladfelter Hall, telephone: 1-7796 jsmasker@temple.edu Office hours MW12:30-1:30 pm; F by appt. Course Grader: Stefanie Kasparek (stefanie.ines.kasparek@temple.edu) Fall Term 2013 Class Time: MWF 2:00 pm Class meets in Gladfelter 21 Description: This course offers an interdisciplinary introduction to major themes in international studies. It explores the history and evolution of major international trends from different disciplinary perspectives, including political science, economics, law, history, the humanities and the natural sciences. Particular attention is given to trends in the nature of war, political and economic development, international law, human rights, disease and health, and governance of the global commons. The course is organized in three parts. Part I briefly introduces major trends in world affairs, including the nature of war, trade, disease, international law, and the environment, and explores explanations of these trends from several disciplinary perspectives, ranging from the natural sciences to the social sciences and the humanities. Part II builds on the conceptual work in the previous sections to explore the causes and consequences of inter-state war; emerging forms of global violence in the 21st century, including terrorism and civil wars; the origins of democracy and the prospects for democratization; the emergence of human rights and new norms on humanitarian intervention; the origins and effects of differences in wealth and poverty; variations in health around the world and the global combat against diseases; developments in the protection of the global commons, and the effects of globalization in national societies. Part III concludes the course with a review of primary challenges for the future of world affairs and conclusions. About GenEd: World Affairs satisfies the World Societies requirement in the General Education Program. Gen-Ed classes do not count towards a major, but are designed to help students build critical thinking and communication skills, help you develop ‘information literacy’ and promote curiosity and life-long learning. World Societies courses are designed to help you understand the global processes that shape and link world societies. Specifically, World Societies courses are developed to help you access and analyze information about the world, develop observations and reach tentative conclusions about global processes; interpret evidence and critically analyze what you read and hear; and communicate and defend your interpretations. World Affairs Fall 2013 1 Course requirements: The requirements for this course are: three essays on the weekly readings. These essays in response either to the study questions below or the questions found in Global Politics: A Reader. Each essay should be in the range of 550 to 650 words. These essays are due at the start of class on the first day of the week for which they are assigned. I will not accept late papers. (30% of the grade); two quizzes, to be administered on the dates found below (40% of the grade); a research assignment due on December 2, 2013 (30% of the grade); and Required readings: Because of the interdisciplinary nature of the course, we will draw readings from a number of sources – including a textbook, scholarly books and articles, historical primary sources, and newspaper and magazine articles – drawn from a variety of disciplines and perspectives. Book to purchase: Introduction to Global Politics: A Reader, Masker, (ISBN: 978-0-19979625-0) You will find rest of the required readings on the class Blackboard site. Disability policy: Any student who has a need for accommodation based on the impact of a disability should contact me privately to discuss the specific situation as soon as possible. Contact Disability Resources and Services at 215-204-1280 or 100 Ritter Annex to coordinate reasonable accommodations for students with documented disabilities. Plagiarism: Please remember that all work must conform to the university’s policy on academic honesty found in the Temple University Bulletin. All work that you submit to me must be the result of your own efforts. Do not cheat. For more information go to http://www.temple.edu/bulletin/Responsibilities_rights/responsibilities/responsibilities.shtm honesty. All students should, in all assignments, fully and unambiguously cite sources from which they are drawing important ideas and/or sizable quotations (for example, more than eight consecutive words or more than 50% of a given sentence or paragraph). Failure to do so constitutes plagiarism, which is a serious act of academic misconduct and will result in a failing grade for the course and notification of the infraction to the Dean of Students. Similarly, cheating during in-class exercises, copying written assignments from other students, or providing answers to others during in-class exercises are considered acts of academic misconduct. If you are unfamiliar with policies about plagiarism or other types of academic misconduct, you may wish to consult the on-line guide to “Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Acknowledging Sources,” available at the Temple Writing Center or if you still have remaining doubts or specific questions, raise them directly with your teaching assistant or me. Temple University policy on the freedom to teach and learn: Freedom to teach and freedom to learn are inseparable facets of academic freedom. The University has adopted a policy on Student and Faculty Academic Rights and Responsibilities (Policy # 03.70.02) which can be accessed through the following link: http://policies.temple.edu/getdoc.asp?policy_no=03.70.02. World Affairs Fall 2013 2 Late Work Policy You must submit all work on time. If for a major, significant, or highly unusual reason you cannot take one of the quizzes, you must request an extension at least twenty-four hours in advance. You must supply me with proof of the major, significant, or highly unusual nature of the situation. The decision to grant an extension rests with me. You cannot expect any form of makeup event for the quizzes. Polite Behavior Policy Please be polite to each other – and me – in class. Examples of impolite behavior during class include, but are not limited to, yelling, eating food, checking your text messages, and sleeping. I reserve – and the university supports -- the right to ask you to leave the room if you are impolite. If you must use a computer to take notes, please sit in the first 3 rooms of the class room. Course Outline (NB: dates subject to change with notice) Week of August 26 Introduction Week of September 2 Disciplinary Perspectives of the World Weeks of September 9 & 16 War and Peace September 20 Quiz One, last day to submit first response essay Weeks of September 23 & 30 Unconventional War and Violence Week of October 7 Democracy and Democratization Week of October 14 Human Rights and Humanitarian Intervention Week of October 21 Global and National Economies Week of October 28 Wealth and Poverty Week of November 4 Global Health November 6 Last day to submit second response essay Weeks of November 11 & 18 Global Commons November 22 Quiz Two Week of November 25 Local and Global Culture December 2 & 4 Challenges and Priorities December 2 Research Project Due & last day to submit third response essay World Affairs Fall 2013 3 Part I. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on World Affairs Course Assignments Week 1 Introduction Readings Reader, pp 1 - 54 (Week of August 26) Study questions What are the ways in which you are linked to globalization? How do ideas about globalization shape our understanding of the trend? Week 2 Disciplinary Perspectives of the World (Week of September 2) Readings Sheldon Anderson, Jeanne A.K. Hey, Mark Allen Peterson, Stanley W. Toops, and Charles Stevens, International Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Global Issues (Boulder: Westview Press, 2008), “Introduction,” pp. 1-8. Michael Seipel, “Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction,” Truman State University, http://www2.truman.edu/~mseipel/Interdisciplinarity.pdf, accessed on 18 January 2008. Bjorn Lomborg, How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. xi-xxi. Mark Allen Peterson, “Intercultural Relations: Anthropology for International Communication,” in International Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Global Issues (Boulder: Westview Press, 2008), pp. 107-129. Stanley W. Toops, “People, Places and Patterns: Geography in International Affairs,” in International Studies: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Global Issues (Boulder: Westview Press, 2008), pp. 53-73. Study question While the field of “international relations” is often identified as a subfield of political science, every social-science discipline has had something to say about world affairs, including the disciplines of political science, economics, geography and anthropology reviewed in this week’s readings – and others like psychology and sociology not covered in the readings. Based on your reading, which approach do you find most interesting and useful for understanding world affairs? What questions does this discipline ask about world affairs? What categories of analysis does it use, and what insights does it generate about world affairs? World Affairs Fall 2013 4 Part Two – Issues in World Affairs Weeks 3 & 4 War and Peace (Weeks of September 9 & 16) (September 9 is the last day to drop a class) First quiz: September 20 Readings Reader, pp 54 – 88; essays by Ferguson, Amir, Enloe, Manjikian, Alagappa Study Questions – in Global Politics: A Reader, with each essay Week 5 Unconventional War and Violence (Weeks of September 23 & 30) Readings Reader, pp 203-251, essays by Huntington and Anderlini Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions. How is gender important in understanding war? 1. Why is linking terrorism with globalization so difficult to do theoretically? What does this difficulty suggest about the limits of political theory? 2. When did terrorism become a truly global phenomenon, and what enabled it to do so? 3. In what ways are the technologies and processes associated with globalization more beneficial to states? To terrorists? Week 6 Democracy and Democratization (Week of October 7) Readings Richard J. Payne, Global Issues: Politics, Economics, Culture (New York: PearsonLongman, 2007), Chapter 4, “Promoting Democracy,” pp. 108-147. Guy Dinmore, “A Uniform Trend? How Democracy Worldwide is on the Back Foot,” Financial Times, 17 January 2007, p. 9. Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions: 1. What do we mean by democracy? Is democracy making gains in today’s world, as many scholars of the “third and fourth waves” have suggested? Or is democracy in retreat throughout the world? 2. What is the relationship between democracy and peace? Why do some scholars believe in the notion of a democratic peace, and what evidence do they put forward? Why do some other scholars suggest that there is no relationship, or even a negative relationship, between democratization and peace? What do you think, and why? World Affairs Fall 2013 5 Week 7 Human Rights and Intervention (Week of October 14) Readings Reader, essays by Keck, De Waal & Hafner-Burton Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions 1. Which can protect human rights better: states or NGOs? 2. What is the relationship between rights and duties? 3. What are the problems involved in assigning rights to peoples as opposed to individuals? 4. In what ways can gender bias be identified in the modern human rights regime? 5. What is the relationship between democracy and human rights? Is it always the case that democracies are more likely to respect human rights than authoritarian regimes? 6. Can the compromising of human rights in the face of the threat of terrorism ever be justified as the lesser of two evils? 7. What is human security? How is it different from the concept of national security? Week 8 Global and National Economies (Week of October 21) (October 22 is the last day to withdraw from a class) Readings Reader, pp 312 - 334 Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions 1. Did a loss of US hegemony cause the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system? 2. Are there any issues on which mercantilists agree with liberals? 3. Does rational choice theory explain more about outcomes than actors’ preferences? 4. Why do skeptics doubt that globalization is transforming IPE? 5. What vulnerabilities faced by states in the globalizing economy did the 2008–13 financial crisis demonstrate? 6. How can we explain the different impact that globalization has on different states? World Affairs Fall 2013 6 Week 9 Wealth and Poverty (Week of October 28) Readings Reader, pp 334-361; Peter Katel, “Ending Poverty in Africa,” CQ Researcher, Vol. 15, No. 31 (September 2005) Peter Singer, One World: The Ethics of Globalization (New Haven: Yale University Press 2002), Chapter 5: “One Community?” pp. 150-195. Andrew Kuper, “More than Charity: Cosmopolitan Alternatives to the ‘Singer Solution’,” Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 107-120; and the subsequent debate between Singer and Kuper, pp. 121-128. Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions 1. What does poverty mean? 2. Explain the orthodox approach to development and outline the criteria by which it measures development. 3. Compare and contrast the orthodox and alternative explanations of hunger. 4. Account for the increasing gap between rich and poor states and people after 50 years of official development policies. 5. Use a gendered lens to explore the nature of poverty. 6. Which development pathway—the reformist or the alternative—do you regard as the more likely to contribute to global peace in the 21st century? 7. Are national poverty-reduction strategies contributing to national ownership of development policies in the Third World? World Affairs Fall 2013 7 Week 10 Global Health (Week of November 4) Readings Gian Luca Burci, “Health and Infectious Disease,” in Thomas G. Weiss and Sam Daws, eds., The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 582-591. Laurie Garrett, “The Challenge of Global Health,” Foreign Affairs, January/February 2007, available on-line at: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070101faessay86103/lauriegarrett/the-challenge-of-global-health.html. “How to Promote Global Health: A Foreign Affairs Roundtable,” available on-line at: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/special/global_health/ -- read essays by Sachs, Farmer, and Garrett only. Anne Mills and Sam Shillcut, “Communicable Diseases,” in Bjorn Lomborg, ed., How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 19-37. Michael Specter, “What Money Can Buy,” The New Yorker, 24 October 2005, pp. 57-71. Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions 1. All of this week’s readings, in different ways, review the problems of posed by communicable diseases, as well as the more general problems of promoting global health, and discuss the most promising and cost-effective ways of addressing these challenges. Based on your reading of these sources, what (if anything) do you think that wealthy countries like the United States should do to promote global health? 2. If you were sick in the United States, where would you go for treatment? Compare the quality, availability, and cost of the care you receive with that discussed in the readings. World Affairs Fall 2013 8 Week 11 Global Commons Readings Reader, pp 362 -- 393 (Weeks of November 11 & 18) Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions. The essay is due on April 9. 1. What precisely is a global commons (define and give examples)? Why are commons so difficult to protect, according to economists and political scientists (see “the tragedy of the commons”), and what can be done to protect them? Can we point to any success stories so far in the effort to protect the commons, and do these suggest hope for the issue of climate change? 2. It can be argued that the amount of disagreement among scientists about climate change is decreasing (see the IPPC 4th assessment report), but economists still appear fundamentally at odds about whether the benefits of tackling climate change outweigh the costs? Why do the economists in this week’s readings disagree on these questions? Which arguments do you find most convincing, and why? 3. What are the normative issues raised by climate change, according to Singer and others? What specifically should we in the United States be prepared to do to fend off climate change, and why? World Affairs Fall 2013 9 Week 12 Readings Local and Global Culture (Week of November 25) Reader, pp 111-177 Study Questions -- Please answer one of the following questions. 1. In the readings for this week, Martin Wolf argues that “liberal” economic globalization “works.” What does he mean by this claim, and how does he justify this claim? By contrast, Joseph Stiglitz is critical of globalization as it has unfolded in the past several decades, and argues that “another world” is possible. What does Stiglitz think is wrong with globalization today, and what kind of policies would lead to his proposed “better world?” Which author makes the better arguments, in your view, and why? 2. Is the United States losing its ability to control global events? Give examples to support your answer. If you answered yes, what do you think caused this change? 3. What does the growing global assertiveness mean for the United States? 4. The concept of globalization implies different kinds of power. How have international power relationships changed since 1945? 1989? 2001? 2011? 5. Do NGOs have a valuable role in global politics? Part Three – The Future(s) of World Affairs Week 13 Challenges and Priorities Research Project Due December 2 World Affairs Fall 2013 10 (December 2 & 4)