Washington State Strategic Plan for Victim Services July 2005 STATE OF WASHINGTON Prepared by Technical Assistance for Community Services The Washington State Strategic Planning Process for Crime Victim Services was supported by funding from the Washington State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development, Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, and the Department of Social and Health Services, Children's Administration, through a grant from the Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Acknowledgements Strategic Plan Steering Committee Steve Eckstrom, Department of Corrections Bev Emery, Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development Susan Hannibal, Department of Social and Health Services Byron Manering, Washington Coalition of Crime Victim Advocates Cletus Nnanabu, Department of Labor and Industries Strategic Plan Task Force Rick Bart, Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Kami Beckwith, Victim Witness Advocate, FBI Suzanne Brown-McBride, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs Fanny Correa, Virginia Mason Separation & Loss Services Seth Dawson, Compass Health Joan Guenther, Washington Coalition of Crime Victim Advocates Suzanne Guinn, MADD of Washington State Alan Lai, Chinese Information and Service Center Amy Mayther, Victim Witness Coordinator, U.S. Attorney's Office Mike McElroy, King County's Prosecutor's Office Mary Ann Murphy, Casey Family Partners Lianne Perron-Kossow, Jefferson County Prosecutor's Office Gary Riesen, Chelan County Prosecuting Attorney Nan Stoops, Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence Carol Ann Thornton, Puyallup Tribe of Indians Jenny Wieland, Families & Friends of Violent Crime Victims Mary Todd, Clark County Prosecutor's Office Tammy Wolf, Department of Corrections Siri Woods, Chelan County Clerk's Office Strategic Plan Consultants Kay Sohl Marlene Farnum Office of Crime Victim Advocacy Grace Call Nicky Gleason With special thanks to all of the service providers and crime victims who attended focus groups, completed surveys, participated in key interviews and reviewed and commented on the Draft Strategic Plan. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 II. Plan Process ............................................................................................................ 4 III. Steering Committee & Task Force Input through Focus Groups, Internet Surveys, and Key Interviews Major Findings ......................................................................................................... 5 Needs Barriers to Accessing Services Promising Practices and Existing Assets IV. Mission, Vision, Values ........................................................................................... 8 V. Outcomes and Strategies ...................................................................................... 9 VI. VII. Four Outcomes Strategies Crime Victim Service Center Concept Implementation Approach .................................................................................. 14 Financial Plan VOCA Current Services VOCA Transition Plan Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 17 Outcomes Data Collection Service Standards Appendices i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. Relationship Between this Strategic Plan, and Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Service Plans................................................................................................................ 19 Outcomes and Strategies Notes........................................................................................................ 20 Input Process Results ........................................................................................................................... 22 Newsletters ........................................................................................................................................... 24 Briefing Book ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Map of Regions ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Schedule of Meetings ............................................................................................................................ 27 Executive Summary Purpose of the Plan The Strategic Plan for Victim Services provides a framework to guide both public and private investment in services for victims of general crime, such as assault, robbery, child abuse, vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, property crime, and survivors of homicide victims. The Plan has been developed with input from victims of crime, law enforcement, the courts, the corrections system, and both system-based and community-based victim service providers. A Task Force of 19 leaders from around the state has played a key role in processing input and advising the five-member, multi-department Strategic Plan Steering Committee throughout the development of the Plan. Vision and Values The Plan is built upon the underlying belief that all crime victims should have access to high quality, culturally appropriate, victim-centered services. To achieve this, it is necessary to support and facilitate the development of services that are accessible, effective, and victim-centered for all crime victims. Findings The planning process included focus groups, interviews, surveys, Task Force discussion, a review of the Task Force Report on Underserved Victims of Crime, analysis of Washington crime data, and analysis of victim service system models from other states. Crime victims in Washington reported that access to information about their rights and available resources to help them cope with the physical, emotional, and financial consequences of crime were extremely important in helping them restore their lives. The Briefing Book attachment to the Plan document contains extensive information on the incidence of crime, victim needs, promising practices, and victim services systems in other states. Many victims expressed strong desires to help other victims through the difficult process of recovery. In some communities, collaborative efforts among community-based social service providers, including domestic violence and sexual assault programs, and system-based resources, including law enforcement, prosecutors’ offices, and the courts, have significantly improved the support provided for crime victims. Unfortunately, many crime victims in Washington lack access to both information and services. Currently, funding for crime victim services is inadequate throughout the state. Many crime victims confront additional cultural, linguistic, geographic, and other barriers to accessing even the limited services that are available. Outcomes and Strategies The Plan is designed to achieve four key Outcomes: 1. Comprehensive services are available for all victims of crime. 2. Standards for victim service providers are developed and implemented. 3. All victims of crime have access to information about rights and resources. 1 4. Culturally appropriate services are available for victims of crime in marginalized or underreported groups. The Plan includes strategies that will be utilized to achieve the four desired Outcomes, as well as detailed notes from the planning process to provide more specific description of the types of activities and approaches envisioned within the strategic framework. The Plan recommends development of a Crime Victim Service Center in each of thirteen regions throughout the state. Crime Victim Service Centers will be collaborative efforts developed within each region to ensure the availability of essential, culturally appropriate services for crime victims. The Centers are envisioned as embodying working relationships among service providers within a region rather than one specific location within a region that houses all services. Funding The Plan is intended to provide a framework for both public and private investment in crime victim services. Currently, the only statewide funding for services for victims of general crime is obtained through the federal Victims of Crime Act (VOCA). The Plan endorses continuation of the current allocation of VOCA resources, utilizing one third of available dollars for domestic violence emergency shelter and advocacy services, one third for victims of sexual assault services, and one third for victims of general crime services. The Plan will guide the use of the VOCA dollars available for services for victims of general crime. The Plan recognizes the need for significantly greater investment in victim services than is possible through current VOCA funding. The creation of regional Crime Victim Service Centers is viewed as a key strategy for efforts to build support for additional public and private investment in needed services. Implementation The Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, within the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development will be responsible for implementation of Plan recommendations regarding the use of VOCA dollars, and will provide leadership during promotion and use of the Plan to guide future investments in crime victim services. Implementation will begin with the award of contracts for regional Crime Victim Service Centers in January 2006. Evaluation The multi-department Steering Committee that has guided development of the Strategic Plan will continue to meet regularly to evaluate progress toward achievement of the four key Outcomes identified in the Plan. Additionally, the Office of Crime Victims Advocacy will monitor and evaluate performance on all contracts awarded for victim services. 2 I. Introduction Victims of general crime, such as assault, robbery, child abuse, vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, property crime, and survivors of homicide confront daunting challenges. As a result of criminal acts, they are injured both physically and emotionally; deprived of property; forced to devote time and energy to restoring their identities, their homes, and businesses; and must work to rebuild their confidence and sense of security. In addition to the losses suffered directly, victims' families and friends find their lives altered as they care for and help loved ones cope with losses, injuries, and, in some cases, permanent disabilities. Families and friends of homicide victims suffer the permanent loss of loved ones. While nothing can fully undo the damage done by criminal acts, access to victim services and resources can, and does make a difference in the lives of crime victims. The State of Washington has made only a modest investment in support of crime victim services. The Strategic Plan for Crime Victim Services is designed to provide a framework to guide the investment of limited public dollars currently available for crime victim services, and to provide support and direction for the development of needed new resources for crime victims. Significant work has already been completed with regard to guidelines and strategies for serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. The relationship between the work done to provide a framework for investment in services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and the framework provided through the Strategic Plan for general crime victim services may be understood through an analogy suggested by the Steering Committee. The analogy involves thinking of the broad topic of victim services as being like a neighborhood. In this neighborhood, the “houses” of domestic violence and sexual assault have already been built (through many thoughtful planning processes, adoption of WAC rules, and sexual assault service provider standards), while the “house” of services for victims of general crime has not yet been built. The Plan is like the blueprint for that new “house” of services for victims of general crime. As in a neighborhood, we want the plan for this new “house” to fit in, and be consistent with the underlying values of the already built domestic violence and sexual assault “houses.” But, we don’t want to try to redesign or rebuild those “houses” while we’re working on the blueprint and construction for the new “house” for victims of general crime. 3 II. Plan Process Steering Committee and Task Force The victim services strategic planning process emerged from the work of an interagency team that includes leaders from the Department of Social and Health Services, the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development, the Department of Corrections, and the Department of Labor and Industries, as well as representation from the Washington Coalition of Crime Victim Advocates. As a first step in the planning process, the interagency team attended a national strategic planning training workshop in Washington, D.C. sponsored by the National Association of Victim Assistance Administrators, and funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime. The team brought what they learned from the training into their role as the Steering Committee for the plan process. A Stakeholder Task Force consisting of committed individuals from community-based organizations, statewide associations, prosecutor and law enforcement programs, system-based victim witness programs, and victims advocacy groups provided advice to the Steering Committee throughout the planning process. The Task Force met three times and reviewed documents via email. Planning consultants worked closely with the Steering Committee and Task Force. The consultants prepared a comprehensive Briefing Book for the Task Force as background information. The Briefing Book provides organizational information about the planning process, and includes crime and victim services data from throughout the state, and information about programs and approaches being utilized in other states. Input through Focus Groups, Internet Surveys, and Key Interviews The input process included focus groups, interviews, surveys, review of the Task Force Report on Underserved Victims of Crime, analysis of Washington crime data and victim service system models from other states, and Task Force discussion. The first survey was designed to determine needs and service priorities. The second survey provided an opportunity for victims and service providers to state their level of agreement with the Draft Strategic Plan outcomes and strategies. An electronic newsletter was sent at key points in the process to an email list of over 300 persons to keep them informed of the plan process and to alert them to opportunities for involvement. The newsletters, Briefing Book, survey instruments, focus group questions and results from the input process, and the Strategic Plan are posted on the OCVA website at: www.ocva.wa.gov. 4 III. Major Findings Through focus groups, an Internet survey and key interviews, victims and service providers identified service needs and barriers to accessing services. Needs Increased, immediate, and sustained support services for victims of crime that include information on victim rights and resources, support during criminal justice process, counseling/therapy, immediate financial assistance, and legal advocacy. Increased training for law enforcement, judges, advocates, and counselors on victim issues, including the point of view of the victim. Increased collaboration among police, prosecutors, system-based victim advocates, and community-based victim service providers to facilitate seamless help for victims. Increased public awareness of crime victim needs and experiences, so that victims of crime and their family members 1) understand how to seek assistance and information about victims rights, and 2) understand the resources available so that family and friends of victims know how to support victims of crime. Agreed upon service standards for core victim services, staff training, and training curriculum to ensure that all victims receive an appropriate level of service. Barriers to Accessing Services Geographic isolation can present a number of barriers to service, including lack of comprehensive services, transportation to services, and culturally appropriate services. Lack of information about rights and resources may result in preventing victims from seeking services because they do not know that it is their right, or they do not know that services are available. Lack of multidimensional assessment of individual need can result in piecemeal service delivery, often time leading to fruitless referrals and, most importantly, not treating the victim as a whole person. Language and cultural differences may prevent victims from seeking services or receiving culturally appropriate help. Lack of sufficient funding for victim services results in very limited services being available to victims of all types of crime. 5 Promising Practices and Existing Assets Victims and service providers shared many examples of how service providers work together to address the needs of victims and both groups talked about the dedication of victims to help other victims. Here are a few examples: Service providers are working collaboratively. In Walla Walla, the Victim Witness Coordinator sees her job as doing everything she can do to meet the needs of a victim. She works with the YWCA, the City's Protection Order Clinic, the Sheriff's office, and independent counselors to meet the needs of victims. In Yakima, the County Prosecutor's Office has a catalog of different programs in the community that includes a listing of who provides financial assistance, sexual assault and domestic violence services, comprehensive mental health services, crisis intervention, homeless services, and private counseling and therapy services. This catalog is used as a source of referral for crime victims. In the Seattle area, Virgina Mason Separation & Loss Services and Families & Friends of Violent Crime Victims provide training and technical assistance to Lutheran Family Services in Spokane to form support groups for survivors of homicide victims. After an initial in-person staff training, telephone conference calls are used to debrief support group sessions and problem-solve any issues that arise. In a number of rural counties, domestic violence and sexual assault providers serve victims of other crimes. During focus group sessions, we heard that in one rural county, the domestic violence and sexual assault center provides help to any victim that comes in, and they offer all the same services that they provide for sexual assault and domestic violence victims. Another county service provider stated that: We are prepared to work with any victim of crime that comes to our agency. We have one staff person that is better at legal, one a better advocator, one a better educator. We assess the needs of the victim and connect them with the staff person who can best meet their needs. A number of providers felt that domestic violence and sexual assault providers could effectively add services for victims of other crimes, if this was within the mission of the organization. Victims have a passion to help other victims. Victims expressed a keen interest in helping others address their victimization through mentoring other victims, helping train law enforcement officers and judges, or getting the word out about what friends and families can do to support a victim of crime. In the words of one victim: You need to have information on what friends and families can do; how they can support a victim. A woman in a professional organization that I belong to sent me a card once a week for several months after the crime. When I thanked her, she said someone had done the same thing for her. 6 Cultural and language needs are being met by providing translation and interpretation services and by addressing language barriers. Since English is a second language for us as well, we can explain the jargon. We understand the problem. At the Chinese Information & Service Center, staff can speak five different Chinese dialects, Vietnamese, and Cambodian, and we provide services in King, Snohomish, and Pierce Counties. We also have the flexibility to provide services outside of this boundary when needed. We know that the radio media is an excellent way to provide information. 80% of Spanish speaking people in the Wenatchee area (and probably across the state) listen to the radio. It is an excellent way to inform the Spanish speaking public about crime victim services—a way to break down the language barrier and the lack of information about services. In Wenatchee, a rural community where the prosecutor's office does not have a translator on staff, the victim/witness coordinator has made arrangements with a bilingual staff person from the local domestic violence shelter to provide assistance with translation needs. 7 IV. Mission, Vision, Values The Steering Committee developed draft mission, vision, and values statements during its Strategic Planning for Victim Services Training Program in Washington, DC. The Task Force reviewed and provided input on the final statements. Vision In Washington State, all crime victims have access to what they need, when they need it. Mission To support, and facilitate the development of services to crime victims that are accessible, effective, and victim-centered. Values We believe that all crime victims should have access to high quality, culturally appropriate, victimcentered services. Victim-centered means to keep the best interest of the victim at the forefront. Victim needs take precedent over system needs, and the victim chooses what they need versus what is being offered. Dollars follow victim needs. 8 V. Outcomes and Strategies The Four Outcomes The Strategic Plan for Crime Victim Services will guide the efforts of the State of Washington to achieve four key Outcomes. Outcome 1: Comprehensive services are available for all victims of crime. Develop regional Crime Victim Service Centers that link resources to make comprehensive, culturally appropriate services available to crime victims throughout the state. Ensure availability of both immediate and sustained support services for victims, including financial assistance with emergency needs, legal advocacy, and information on victim rights and resources. Outcome 2: Standards for victim service providers are developed and implemented. Create a statewide advisory committee to recommend flexible service standards that recognize regional and population differences. Develop standards that define core services and training requirements. Develop specialized service standards for child and adolescent victim services building upon existing standards. Outcome 3: All victims of crime have access to information about rights and resources. Develop user-friendly information about crime victim rights and services, and publicize their availability widely. Highlight local, regional, and state resources, systems, and procedures. Utilize existing community networks to ensure cultural appropriateness and language accessibility. Outcome 4: Culturally appropriate services are available for victims of crime in marginalized or underreported groups. Provide support for non-mainstream interventions, including services responsive to the whole person, increased interpretation and translation, and services that address the specific needs of different populations. 9 The Strategies Strategies are designed to increase service availability for general crime victims, such as victims of financial fraud, physical assault, robbery, child abuse, vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, property crime, and survivors of homicide victims. Details that further explain strategies within each Outcome are presented in Appendix ii. Strategies to Achieve Outcome 1: Comprehensive services are available for all victims of crime. 1. Develop Crime Victim Service Centers that link resources to provide both immediate and sustained support services. Establish thirteen regions. Within each region, fund a Crime Victim Service Center. To the extent possible, base regional boundaries on existing working arrangements among service providers. Take into consideration the benefits and challenges of including both urban and rural areas within a region. 2. Fund Crime Victim Service Centers with VOCA funds. Use a geographic area and population formula for distributing VOCA funds for general crime victim services on a regional basis. Each region will receive a base amount with an add-on that takes into account geographic area and population. 3. Utilize an application for funding process. Regions will be asked to submit a collaborative application. Each region will be responsible for providing culturally appropriate services for marginalized or underreported groups. Strategies to Achieve Outcome 2: Standards for victim service providers are developed and implemented. 1. Develop flexible standards that recognize regional and population differences and allow for reasonable solutions in areas with limited resources. Create a statewide advisory committee to develop standards. To the extent possible, recruit representatives from each region and crime type. The first tasks of the committee will be to: reach agreement on basic principles and underlying values for standards, define project boundaries and define the role and accountability of advisory committee members. 2. Focus on establishing standards for core services, hours and type of staff training required, and criteria for training curriculum. The committee will use input from service providers and victims collected during the strategic plan process as a starting place for defining core services and training requirements. Models for service standards will be reviewed. Standards will include culturally appropriate models and service delivery strategies. 3. Develop specialized service standards for child and adolescent victims of crime. A subcommittee will address specialized standards for children and adolescents. Models for 10 service standards for children and juvenile victims of crime will be reviewed. Strategies to Achieve Outcome 3: All victims of crime have access to information about rights and resources. 1. Organize existing, and develop new, materials into discrete, small units and make materials user-friendly. Develop user-friendly information about crime victim rights and services. Consider developing a handbook that catalogs: available services; a statement of victim rights; a victims’ guide to the legal process; and a list of actions family and friends can take to support victims. Ensure that materials are culturally appropriate and available in different languages. 2. Develop a marketing strategy to build public awareness of resources, and to reach multiple communities, especially the marginalized and underreported. Support service provider communication and coordination through the use of electronic tools. Establish a statewide electronic handbook, organized by region, containing information about rights and services. Include resources for special populations (tribal services, Hispanic services, adolescents, children, developmentally delayed, etc.). 3. Provide training on victim rights and needs. Provide training for specific groups of professionals, law enforcement, judges, court personnel, mental health advocates, counselors and service providers who work with tribes and marginalized or underreported populations on victim rights and needs. Include the voice of victims, and approaches that respect cultural and ethnic sensitivity in curriculum development and training events. 4. Promote a consistent approach to meeting victim legal advocacy needs. Support victim access to legal advocacy through the development of relevant resources and materials for service providers and victims. Strategies to Achieve Outcome 4: Culturally appropriate services are available for victims of crime in marginalized or underreported groups. 1. Support non-mainstream interventions. Earmark funds for special projects that address the needs of diverse populations by promoting non-mainstream interventions. 2. Support services that are responsive to the whole person. Promote multi-dimensional assessment of need by promoting collaboration and communication among service providers in order to respond to multiple needs of individuals. 3. Increase interpretation and translation activities. Cleary define the role of translators and interpreters. Work within each region to increase the availability of interpreters. 11 4. Advocate for diversification of workforce. Advocate for hiring a diversified victim services workforce and a diversified criminal justice system workforce within regions that have a large population of marginalized or underreported groups. Crime Victim Service Center Concept In order to achieve Outcome 1, the Plan recommends the creation of Crime Victim Service Centers to meet the needs of victims of crime in the State of Washington. A Service Center is envisioned as a coalition of service providers who link resources to make comprehensive, culturally appropriate services available to crime victims within each region of the state. It is anticipated that in most or all regions, an existing organization interested in becoming a Victim Service Center will expand its mission to include serving all victims of crime. This organization will sub-contract with other service providers in the region and, if appropriate, with statewide organizations to ensure the availability of both immediate and sustained support for adult, child, and juvenile victims of crime. Perhaps the best way to think about the Center is to think of a "virtual center". The Center is not a physical location. Instead it is a collaborative effort among service providers within a region to provide comprehensive victims services to victims of all crimes. The idea behind calling these collaborative relationships a Center is to build an identity and structure for service delivery to general crime victims. A Crime Victim Service Center logo may be one way to reinforce the Center concept. The logo would provide a visual way to identity all affiliated service providers. Each service provider that is part of the collaborative effort could use the logo in a variety of ways. It could display the logo at its facility, print the logo on brochures, or use it as a part of a phone book listing. The logo could also help police, courts, and other service providers know where to refer crime victims for services. The logo might also help victims to locate available services. Rationale It is more desirable for Washington to have services in all regions of the state, for all types of crime, than to provide in-depth services for certain types of crime, in certain areas of the state. The regional concept provides an infrastructure to deliver services for victims of all crime. The regional concept encompasses the values of continuity, preserving resources within a community, and providing predictable funding. Funding and distribution of available resources Initial funding will come from federal VOCA funds allocated for services to general crime victims with a goal of increasing available funds to meet identified needs. Funds will be distributed using a formula that assigns a base amount to each region along with an add-on amount that takes into consideration population and geographic area. To the extent possible, regional boundaries will follow existing collaborative and working relationships among service providers and will consider the benefits and challenges of including 12 urban population centers and rural areas within a region. See Appendix vi for a map of these regions. In addition to the funds for each region, there will be a discretionary amount of VOCA funds that regions or statewide organizations can apply for to address barriers or other factors for which extra consideration should be given. Total funding available for such discretionary grants will be equal to the base-funding amount used in the regional allocation formula. Application process It is envisioned that the application process for regions will be a collaborative, community approach. Each region will submit one proposal stating what they plan to accomplish with the VOCA funds in their region. As long as a region agrees on an application, the application will be funded. If more than one application is submitted per region, then a decision on which application to fund will be made at the state government level. Core services and standards The application will include a list of eligible services, even though formal standards will not be in place by the time the initial application is issued. The application will ask a service provider to explain how they will expand to be a Crime Victim Service Center and how they will work with others within the region. Section VI of this Plan discusses the application process in greater depth. 13 VI. Implementation Approach Financial Plan The Strategic Plan for Crime Victim Services has been designed to focus energy, and articulate and prioritize goals and strategies for meeting the needs of victims of general crime. It is anticipated that the Plan will be used as a fundraising tool. It provides decision makers with a clear statement of general crime victim needs, and provides a strategic direction for meeting these needs. The Strategic Plan is intended to guide the expenditure of VOCA funds for general crime victim services, and to guide the expenditure of any new funds that are generated for general crime victim services, such as Washington State General Funds or new federal grants. Additionally, it is anticipated that once the Crime Victim Service Centers are operational, these Centers will be in a good position to attract pro bono services, private contributions, foundation funds, and other governmental grants at the local, regional, and tribal level to supplement VOCA funds. The Briefing Book contains information on funding strategies used in other states to fund crime victim services. The Briefing Book is posted on the OCVA website at: www.ocva.wa.gov. VOCA Current Services Currently, VOCA funds are awarded in three categories: 1) domestic violence emergency shelter and advocacy services, 2) services for victims of sexual assault, and 3) services for victims of general crime. VOCA funds are distributed equally among the three categories. The Strategic Plan provides guidance for the 1/3 of VOCA funds designated for victims of general crime. The funding policy for allocating 1/3 of VOCA funds for domestic violence emergency shelter and advocacy services and the 1/3 of VOCA funds for victims of sexual assault services will not change as a result of the Strategic Plan. What will change is that domestic violence and sexual assault services will no longer be funded by the 1/3 of VOCA funds designated for general crime victim services. The Office of Crime Victims Advocacy assumes responsibility for the administration of the VOCA grant on July 1, 2005. DSHS will continue to manage current general crime victim contracts through September 30, 2005 at which time all VOCA contracts for services to general crime victims will terminate. The 1/3 of VOCA funds designated for services for victims of general crime will be used to implement the Strategic Plan. There will no longer be a competitive process for these funds. VOCA Transition Plan The Office of Crime Victims Advocacy will administer VOCA funds for general crime victim services. OCVA will utilize a geographic/population formula for distributing funds among the 13 regions. A setaside will be established to address barriers or other factors that impact service delivery to marginalized populations. 14 Crime Victim Service Centers The following three principles will guide the development of Crime Victim Service Centers. A regional Center must: Be victim focused Provide services to victims whether or not they report the crime to state or federal law enforcement Provide services to victims whether or not the case is being prosecuted As long as a service provider meets these guidelines, it can apply to be the contracting agency or to be a sub-contractor within a Service Center. OCVA will contract with only one agency within a region. This agency may deliver direct services or contract with others agencies to provide services. The goal is for the Service Center to be a collaborative effort that reflects the thinking of the whole region. Formation of a Crime Victim Service Center might happen like this: Service providers within a region agree that there is one agency that is a natural fit to be the contract agency. Currently this agency serves some general crime victims, sexual assault victims, and victims of child abuse. It does not serve survivors of homicide victims, victims of vehicular assault, or victims of other general crime, such as property crimes. Service providers decide that the best way to provide these other services is for this agency to sub-contract with regional service providers for some of the needed services and to contract with statewide service providers for other needed services. The 1/3 VOCA funds can only be used for services to general crime victims. Services for sexual assault victims must be funded through other funding sources. Another possibility is: In one of the rural regions there are very few crime victim services. The service providers within the region decide that the domestic violence agency is the best agency to become the agency to contract with OCVA. The domestic violence agency broadens its mission to include providing services to general crime victims. The domestic violence agency can use the VOCA funds for general crime victims only to provide general crime victim services. It subcontracts with other service providers in the region or from statewide organizations to provide services that the agency is not able, or does not want, to increase capacity to provide. These are just two examples. Regions will be encouraged to explore creative approaches within their region. The goal is to meet the needs of victims of general crime within each region. The premise is that the service providers within a region are in the best position to determine the best approach to providing services. The chart on the next page outlines the process for awarding contracts to Comprehensive Victim Service Centers. 15 OCVA Process Crime Victim Service Centers Contract Award July 2005 Develop application process. Convene information meetings around the state to explain the Strategic Plan and announce the allocation amount for each region. August 2005 Invite all interested parties within a region to attend up to three, one-day planning sessions. A facilitator and OCVA staff person will facilitate a discussion on how service providers might work together to form a Crime Victim Service Center. September 2005 Applications will be available. Mid-November 2005 Deadline for application submittal. January 2006 Initial awards will be for an 18-month period – January 2006 through June 2007. Funds will be for a 21-month period to compensate for initial start-up costs. The application process will utilize a collaborative, community approach. Each region will submit one proposal stating what they plan to accomplish with the VOCA funds in their region. As long as a region agrees on an application, the application will be funded. If more than one application is submitted per region, then a decision on which application to fund will be made by OCVA. Subsequent applications will be on a biennial cycle. Every two years, a region can review its application and decide if it wants to place services in a different priority order, shift funding as needs within a region shift, work with new agencies, or make any other changes that the region feels would benefit victims of crime. A Crime Victim Service Center will be expected to ensure the availability of both immediate and sustained support services for adult, child, and juvenile victims. A list of essential services, permitted services, and services that are not allowed will be developed by OCVA, and will be included in the application. A draft list of services follows. 16 Draft List of Services for Crime Victim Service Centers Essential Services Crisis intervention General advocacy Support groups Emergency client assistance (such as immediate financial assistance) Legal advocacy Assistance with crime victim compensation application Language, translation, and cultural services Information about victim rights Information about victim services Training Systems advocacy Permitted services Therapy/counseling Medical advocacy Services not permitted VOCA prohibited services Demonstration Projects The application process for applying for demonstration project funds will be developed during the first year of Plan implementation. This will allow sufficient time for an in-depth discussion on the type of demonstration projects that will be consistent with VOCA guidelines. It is anticipated that demonstration projects will address service barriers or other factors that impact service delivery to marginalized populations. OCVA will develop an application process and timeline by January 1, 2006. It is anticipated that contracts will be awarded by July 1, 2006. VII. Evaluation Outcomes The four Outcomes mentioned earlier will be the basis for measuring progress in implementing the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan Steering Committee will meet twice a year for the next five years to discuss progress in meeting these four Outcomes. Each strategy within an Outcome will be the indicator of progress toward meeting the Outcome. Data submitted by Crime Victim Service Centers and data collected by OCVA on statewide efforts will be used to determine if strategies are being achieved. A timeline for assessing progress towards meeting Outcomes will be developed by OCVA. 17 Data Collection OCVA will, as part of the application process, define data collection requirements. At a minimum, Crime Victim Service Centers will track number and victim type of clients served, and demographic information such as age, sex, place of residence, race/ethnicity, and any other data elements required by the VOCA grant. Service Standards Standards will not be developed prior to issuance of the first application for Crime Victim Service Centers. It is anticipated that standards will be available prior to the June, 2007 reapplication cycle. OCVA will convene a statewide advisory committee no later than January 1, 2006 to develop service standards. The committee will complete its work by January 1, 2007. 18 Appendices Appendix i: Relationship between this Strategic Plan, and Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Service Plans The Strategic Plan for general crime victim services is consistent with the Domestic Violence Emergency Shelter and Advocacy Services Plan and the Sexual Assault Services Plan. Each individual Plan works toward meeting the four Outcomes articulated in this Strategic Plan for Victim Service through different, but complementary approaches. The Outcomes are: 1) availability of comprehensive services for all victims of crime, 2) standards for victim service providers, 3) access to information about rights and resources, and 4) availability of culturally appropriate services for marginalized or underreported groups. Domestic violence shelter programs that receive funds from DSHS must comply with applicable state rules contained in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 388-61A). This code addresses facility requirements, requirements for shelter homes that are not part of a domestic violence service, service requirements, and staff training and supervision requirements. Shelters apply to be considered for funding, and if approved are eligible for funds that are distributed annually by a noncompetitive formula. As part of the contracting process, shelters submit an annual renewal application. Accreditation is required for any agency or program wishing to be designated as a Certified Sexual Assault Program (CSAP). A CSAP is eligible for noncompetitive funding to provide core services in a designated geographic area. Accreditation occurs every two years, during the first six months of the state fiscal year. To receive accreditation, an agency must reach compliance with service and management standards. Standards exist for sexual assault core services, specialized services, and services for marginalized and Native American populations. Standards specify definition of service, goal, activities, service recipients, and staff and supervisory training requirements. Sexual assault services funded by the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) must meet the service standards established for sexual assault programs. 19 Appendix ii: Outcomes and Strategies Notes These notes reflect input that was provided during the planning process from the Task Force, focus groups, interviews and the survey. They provide additional detailed suggestions and examples of how strategies might be implemented. Outcome I: Comprehensive services are available for all victims of crime. Additional notes to Strategies See Section VI: Implementation for greater detail on strategies 1-3. Outcome 2: Standards for victim service providers are developed and implemented. Additional Notes to Strategies Strategy 2 The Service Standards Committee may want to consider developing general service standards that crossover all crime types and specific standards by crime type for services unique to a crime type. It also may want to advocate for Washington Prosecutors Association (WAPA) to review victim/witness coordinator standards to ensure that there is coordination between the general crime victim service standards that are developed and victim/witness coordinator service standards in order to ensure efficient and effective service delivery to victims. Strategy 3 The National Children's Alliance, Children's Advocacy Center service standards, and FBI standards for child victims/witnesses may provide a model for victims of crime service standards for children and adolescents. Outcome 3: All victims of crime have access to information about rights and resources. Additional Notes to Strategies Strategy 1 Include victims in the review of existing materials and in the development of new materials to ensure that materials are user friendly, e.g. qualification for emergency funds, availability of Crime victim compensation. Consider providing materials in large print, Braille, and audio formats. One existing resource that might be helpful is the wallet-size card used by the FBI that lists the federal law for victim rights on one side, and a list of services available on the other side. Strategy 2 Distribute information and materials in places where people go, such as hospitals, grocery stores, doctors' offices, hair salons, bathrooms, restaurants, bowling alleys, train and bus stations, hotels, and local and regional bus shelters. Educate workers who are most likely to have initial contact with victim, such as medical providers, police, "211" information & referral line, crisis lines. 20 Present programs in schools, churches, etc. on what it is like to be a crime victim and where to go for services. When appropriate and safe for specific crime categories or situations, seek out victims by tracking crime reports, newspaper articles, and inform victims of availability of materials and services. Tap into existing community networks (block watch, etc.) with prevention, awareness, and referral information. Strategy 3 Whenever possible, training events need to be coordinated with existing forums. Strategy 4 One way to increase accessibility to legal advocacy is to develop a legal handbook that includes a statewide database for attorneys who provide pro bono legal services, a guide to legalese, and a realistic explanation for victims of what is going to happen during the court process. The handbook would define the role and availability of legal advocates. The handbook should also include resources for special populations, such as victims who are developmentally delayed. The handbook would be translated into languages according to population size in the state. The effort to increase accessibility to legal advocacy should be coordinated with appropriate agencies. Input from the National Crime Victim Bar Association might be helpful. One approach to promoting comprehensive access to legal advocacy would be for Crime Victim Service Centers to promote the availability of advocates to help victims fill out legal paperwork, act as a coach through legal system, and to increase the availability of legal advocates for tribal members and for different language groups. Outcome 4: Culturally appropriate services are available for victims of crime in marginalized or underreported groups. Additional Notes to Strategies Strategy 1 Special projects might involve informal groups, families, community institutions, and local media in increasing awareness of victim needs and services or building relationships among victim service providers, community service providers, or natural community resources. Or, a special project might look at the use of community outreach strategies to educate service providers on availability of resources for crime victims. Another project might look at the use of non-criminal justice approaches that victims trust and that meets victim needs. Strategy 3 Ways of increasing interpretation and translation activities might include: translating legalese; developing flow charts of the criminal process, including a translation of different crime types; and increasing the availability of interpreters to explain the court process, as well as to explain legalese and to help the victim and the court understand cultural differences within the court setting. Training would be done outside of the courtroom setting. 21 Appendix iii: Input Process Results Crime Victim Needs Needs were identified through Task Force discussion, review of the Task Force Report on Underserved Victims of Crime, focus groups, interviews, and an Internet survey. Common Themes Identified by Victims and Victim Service Providers Need more training for law enforcement, judges, advocates, and counselors on victims issues There is a lack of services for child victims Victims and others in the system lack info on victim rights There is a lack of access to info about emergency funds for crime related expenses Need more public awareness of crime victim needs/experiences - need information on what it is like to be a crime victim. Friends and families need to know what they can do to support a victim Need a phone number like '911' for victims to call to find out about services Victims need assistance at the time of the crime and they need ongoing support Victims need legal assistance Transportation is a significant barrier to obtaining services Victim services for all victims should be well funded and well organized Issues Identified by Victims and Potential Strategies Not Highlighted by Service Providers Victims need a realistic appraisal of the legal process (e.g. restraining orders, court process, times for court hearings changing, guide to legalese) Victims are frustrated and angry at court systems - they express loss of faith in the system Immediate financial assistance is a need Victims are interested in mentoring other victims Victims need counselors who look like them: someone with whom victims can identify Victims are interested in helping train law enforcement officials and judges There is a need to get word out about services, no matter how meager the services 22 Issues Identified by Service Providers and Potential Strategies Not Highlighted by Victims Need for collaboration—nonprofit organizations and victim witness services need to work together There is a disparity between urban and rural needs Greater access to appropriate language and cultural services is needed There is a lack of funding for crime victim services A more detailed report on the input process is posted on the OCVA website at: www.ocva.wa.gov. 23 Appendix iv: Newsletters The newsletters provided information on the plan process and opportunities for input during the process. Newsletters are posted on the OCVA website at: www.ocva.wa.gov. 24 Appendix v: Briefing Book This Briefing Book was prepared for the Stakeholder Task Force as a starting point for working together to more fully understand the experiences of crime victims throughout the state and the experiences of multiple efforts to meet the needs of victims. Part I of the Briefing Book provides basic organizational information about the planning process and the Task Force, as well as contact information for Task Force members, the Steering Committee, and the planning consultants. Part I also contains information about strategies that were used for gathering additional input as part of the planning process. Part II of the Briefing Book provides background information about crime and services for victims in Washington. Part II also summarizes state and federal requirements for victim services, the results of related planning processes, practices in other states, and information on cores services and standards for services for victims. Part II was revised in March 2005 to reflect input from the Task Force during the planning process. The Briefing Book is posted on the OCVA website at: www.ocva.wa.gov. 25 Appendix vi: Map of Regions 26 Appendix vii: Schedule of Meetings Date of Meeting County(ies) Region No. Time Location of Meeting 26-Jul King 1 9:00 - 12:00 Seattle 27-Jul Spokane 3 1:30 - 4:30 Spokane 29-Jul Snohomish; Island 4 9:30 - 12:30 Everett 9-Aug Ferry; Stevens; Pend Orielle 6 9:00 - 11:00 Colville 9-Aug Grant; Lincoln; Adams; Whitman 8 2:00 - 4:00 Davenport 15-Aug Okanogan; Chelan; Douglas 9 1:00 - 3:00 Wenatchee 17-Aug Skamania; Klickitat; Yakima; Kittitas 10 9:30 - 11:30 Yakima 17-Aug Benton; Franklin; Walla x 2; Columbia; Garfield; Asotin 7 2:30 - 4:30 Walla Walla 18-Aug Clark; Cowlitz; Wahkiakum 5 9:00 - 12:00 Kelso or Longview 18-Aug Pacific; Lewis; Grays Harbor; Thurston; Mason 11 2:00 - 5:00 Olympia 24-Aug Whatcom; Skagit; San Juan 12 9:00 - 11:00 Mt. Vernon 24-Aug Clallam; Jefferson; Kitsap 13 2:00 - 4:00 Pt. Townsend 26-Aug Pierce 2 :00 - 4:00 Tacoma 27