Sophomore Composition & Conversation Section C Tuesday Friday 14 :15-15:30 AV 212 Sherri Wei SF 122 0916-031-071 wyc212@ms75.hinet.net This two-semester course aims to improve students’ writing and oral communication skills for upper-level academic works in the English department. Students who successfully complete Composition II are expected to engage in interactive/ collaborative reading and writing activities. employ a repertoire of writing strategies to generate and select topics, plan, organize and structure to develop a focus, and use specific and concrete evidence to support. conduct introductory library and online research; integrate facts and opinion from multiple sources appropriately. Grading Policy Your Composition grade = 10% Online Discussion + 20 % Journals + 40 % Two Essays [2 drafts] (Article Review & Film Character Analysis) + 30% Synthesis [3 drafts] Your Conversation grade = 20% Class Participation+ 40% Midterm & Final + 40%Presentations (Article Review + Grammar Review +) Composition Requirement 1. Plagiarism is strictly prohibited for all essays! Article Review (3-4 pages; 900-1200 words; 2 drafts) You would need to write a summary and critique based on the assigned article. A clear thesis statement must be provided at the end of the introduction; and the summary and critique should support that thesis statement. All paraphrasing and quoting must conform to MLA style. 2. Film Character Analysis In this assignment you would need to demonstrate your critical thinking and analytical abilities. Please choose from the following five films first and focus on one single character for your analysis. This essay should base totally on your own ideas, not relying on any secondary sources. Further guidance would be provided as we approach this task. Five Films to Choose from: Marvin’s Room (1996) 98 min. byJerry Zaks 791.43 Z21 DVDe The Aviator (2004) 170 min. by Martin Scorsese Citizen Kane (1941) 119 min. by Orson Welles 791.43 W449 Little Miss Sunshine (2007) by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris (Liberal Arts Library) DVD 987.83 9472 Gorillas in the Mist 129 min. Michael Apted 791.43 Ap655g Ve (LD) 3. Synthesis (3-4 pages; 900-1200 words; 3 drafts) In this essay, you need to practice writing with various sources instead of merely writing based on your own ideas and examples. You would be given a set of 3 articles to read and pull In order to put the emphasis on correct synthesis and citation, rather than research, each teacher may choose to prescribe a set of 3 articles for the students in his/her section to synthesize. 4. 5 writing journals (4 pages each time; 1000-1200 words) Conversation Joint Activity Christmas Exhibit. Tues. 12/18, 12:30-3:30. Topics selected by lottery on Tues. 10/02 Each section will work as a single group to “perform” its presentation, comprising of whatever combination of drama, PowerPoint presentation, or other format the section chooses, in front of the rest of the sophomore class. Each section’s presentation will run 25 min., with 5 min. for Q&A. Topics for Christmas Exhibition this year: Origins of Christmas, Santa Claus, Chanukah (a Jewish holiday around Christmastime), Origin/Analyses of Christmas Carols, Christmas and Technology (Advances in Christmas cards, post-modern Christmas, virtual Christmas), Christmas Trees (types, how to grow, when to harvest, marketing), Christmas in Painting (Representations of the Nativity and Christmas story in Western art), Comparison of Christmas Customs in Two Countries (e.g., Iceland and Australia), Christmas in the Bible, Geography of Christmas (places mentioned in the Bible accounts, then and now) Tentative Schedule Wk Date 1 9/18 9/21 2 9/25 9/28 3 10/02 Topic Reading Assignment Course Orientation Article Review Moon Festival Holiday Teacher’s Day Holiday 10/05 Decide Christmas Exhibit Topic More on Article Review The writing process 4 10/09 10/12 Library Orientation SF 130 Summarizing & Responding to Reading Journal 1 5 10/16 Thesis Writing Article Review 2 10/19 Racial Segregation 6 10/23 10/26 Character Analysis I Individual Conference I Journal 2 7 10/30 11/02 Unity and Coherence Survival Handbook Skit Character Analysis 1 8 11/06 11/09 Grammar Review I Grammar Review II 9 11/13 11/16 Writing Mid-term Exam Oral Midterm Exam 10 11/20 11/23 Synthesis & Mixed Modes Individual Conference II 11 11/27 11/30 Peer Editing on Illustration Gender Roles 12 12/04 12/07 MLA Review I Advertisement Analysis Peer Edition on Draft 1 13 12/11 12/14 Mock Christmas Presentation MLA Review II Journal 4 14 12/18 12/21 Christmas Exhibit SF Theater Movie 15 12/25 12/28 Christmas Holiday Peer Editing on Clarity 16 01/01 01/04 New Year Holiday Individual Conference III 17 01/08 01/11 Exam Writing Strategies Review 01/15 01/18 Final Writing Exam—12:30—15:30 Course Evaluation 18 Final Oral Exam Ch 1 & 2 Article Review 1 Ch 4 P 169 Character Analysis 2 Ch 7 P 281 Journal 3 Synthesis Daft 1 Ch 6 P 229 Ch 10 P387 Synthesis Daft 2 Synthesis Final Draft Journal 5 Article Review Guideline (about 900-1200 words) Purpose. The purpose of an article review is to summarize and evaluate the argument and method of an academic article. Audience. Your imagined audience should be educated readers in the academic community who want a clear, objective summary of an article, plus some reflections on the value and quality of the article by someone who has taken time to think about it. Structure. Like other writing modes, a review can take a number of possible forms. To review a book, you might summarize and evaluate each chapter or section separately. For an article review, it might be better to summarize the entire article first, then do the evaluation. In either case, a review should begin with an introduction and end with a conclusion. Following is a recommended structure for the article review (word counts are only general guidelines and don’t need to be followed strictly): I. Introduction (about 150 words). Give some perspective on the significance of the article. Begin with a brief overview of Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” (not a detailed plot summary, but basically what it’s about) and your response to it. Then make a transition to Fetterley’s article as an example of a professional scholar grappling with this story. End with a thesis statement summarizing your overall view of the article, positive and negative. II. Summary (about 300 words). Objectively summarize the argument (what the author argues, and how she structures the argument). The summary should be mostly paraphrasing, with a few strong quotations mixed in, cited in parentheses according to MLA style. III. Evaluation (about 600 words) A. Positive. What do you like about the article? What aspects of the article are most interesting and successful? Here you can consider such elements as logic, method, evidence, structure, and clarity; and other dimensions: Is the article insightful? Is it useful? As evidence of the positive aspects, discuss a couple of persuasive or insightful interpretations (by Fetterley) of passages in Faulkner’s story—that is, interpretations that help you understand something in the story that you didn’t understand before. B. Negative. What don’t you like about the article? What aspects of the article seem least interesting or successful, or most open to question? Here you can also consider logic, method, evidence, structure, clarity, as well as other dimensions like insight and usefulness. Are there places where the logic seems questionable? Where the author doesn’t provide enough evidence, or where you would want a different kind of evidence? Where the language is not clear? If you take issue with a particular statement Fetterley makes, then quote the statement first, then discuss it. As evidence of the negative aspects, discuss a couple of problematic interpretations (by Fetterley) of passages in Faulkner’s story—that is, interpretations you find unconvincing or open to dispute. Demonstrate, through specific reference to Faulkner’s text, where exactly Fetterley’s interpretations have problems and how your interpretation of Faulkner’s story differs from hers. Throughout this “negative” section, your tone should be scholarly and respectful. IV. Conclusion (about 100 words). Now after “taking apart” the article and criticizing it in detail, you should make some effort to “put it together again.” Remind the reader of the article’s general significance and accomplishments, summarize your overall response to the article, and conclude with an interesting statement, insight, or question arising from your analysis. Format. List your name and other information in the upper left, as indicated in the syllabus. Cite page numbers according to MLA style. Instead of a title, list the bibliographic information as indicated below. In your article review you should make reference to Faulkner’s story “A Rose for Emily” and quote from it using MLA style. Therefore, list the story in MLA format in a Works Cited list at the end. (Do not include Fetterley’s article in the Works Cited list because you will put that information on the first page.) John Doe 592201999 Sophomore Composition and Conversation Teacher’s Name Essay 1.1 Date Review of Judith Fetterley. “A Rose for ‘A Rose for Emily.’” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Jerome Beaty et al. New York: Norton, 2002. 252-58.